The FDOT Annual Average Daily Traffic feature class provides spatial information on Annual Average Daily Traffic section breaks for the state of Florida. In addition, it provides affiliated traffic information like KFCTR, DFCTR and TFCTR among others. This dataset is maintained by the Transportation Data & Analytics office (TDA). The source spatial data for this hosted feature layer was created on: 07/12/2025.Download Data: Enter Guest as Username to download the source shapefile from here: https://ftp.fdot.gov/file/d/FTP/FDOT/co/planning/transtat/gis/shapefiles/aadt.zip

Content

Average Daily Traffic (ADT) counts are analogous to a census count of vehicles on city streets. These counts provide a close approximation to the actual number of vehicles passing through a given location on an average weekday. Since it is not possible to count every vehicle on every city street, sample counts are taken along larger streets to get an estimate of traffic on half-mile or one-mile street segments. ADT counts are used by city planners, transportation engineers, real-estate developers, marketers and many others for myriad planning and operational purposes. Data Owner: Transportation. Time Period: 2006. Frequency: A citywide count is taken approximately every 10 years. A limited number of traffic counts will be taken and added to the list periodically. Related Applications: Traffic Information Interactive Map (http://webapps.cityofchicago.org/traffic/).

Context

This is a dataset hosted by the City of Chicago. The city has an open data platform found here and they update their information according the amount of data that is brought in. Explore the City of Chicago using Kaggle and all of the data sources available through the City of Chicago organization page!

• Update Frequency: This dataset is updated annually.

Acknowledgements

This dataset is maintained using Socrata's API and Kaggle's API. Socrata has assisted countless organizations with hosting their open data and has been an integral part of the process of bringing more data to the public.

Cover photo by Denys Nevozhai on Unsplash
Unsplash Images are distributed under a unique Unsplash License.

This dataset contains the current estimated speed for about 1250 segments covering 300 miles of arterial roads. For a more detailed description, please go to https://tas.chicago.gov, click the About button at the bottom of the page, and then the MAP LAYERS tab.

The Chicago Traffic Tracker estimates traffic congestion on Chicago’s arterial streets (nonfreeway streets) in real-time by continuously monitoring and analyzing GPS traces received from Chicago Transit Authority (CTA) buses. Two types of congestion estimates are produced every ten minutes: 1) by Traffic Segments and 2) by Traffic Regions or Zones. Congestion estimate by traffic segments gives the observed speed typically for one-half mile of a street in one direction of traffic.

Traffic Segment level congestion is available for about 300 miles of principal arterials. Congestion by Traffic Region gives the average traffic condition for all arterial street segments within a region. A traffic region is comprised of two or three community areas with comparable traffic patterns. 29 regions are created to cover the entire city (except O’Hare airport area). This dataset contains the current estimated speed for about 1250 segments covering 300 miles of arterial roads. There is much volatility in traffic segment speed. However, the congestion estimates for the traffic regions remain consistent for relatively longer period. Most volatility in arterial speed comes from the very nature of the arterials themselves. Due to a myriad of factors, including but not limited to frequent intersections, traffic signals, transit movements, availability of alternative routes, crashes, short length of the segments, etc. speed on individual arterial segments can fluctuate from heavily congested to no congestion and back in a few minutes. The segment speed and traffic region congestion estimates together may give a better understanding of the actual traffic conditions.

This is a traffic dataset which contains balance size of encrypted malicious and legitimate traffic for encrypted malicious traffic detection. The dataset is a secondary csv feature data which is composed of five public traffic datasets. Our dataset is composed based on three criteria: The first criterion is to combine widely considered public datasets which contain both encrypted malicious and legitimate traffic in existing works, such as the Malwares Capture Facility Project dataset and the CICIDS-2017 dataset. The second criterion is to ensure the data balance, i.e., balance of malicious and legitimate network traffic and similar size of network traffic contributed by each individual dataset. Thus, approximate proportions of malicious and legitimate traffic from each selected public dataset are extracted by using random sampling. We also ensured that there will be no traffic size from one selected public dataset that is much larger than other selected public datasets. The third criterion is that our dataset includes both conventional devices' and IoT devices' encrypted malicious and legitimate traffic, as these devices are increasingly being deployed and are working in the same environments such as offices, homes, and other smart city settings.

Based on the criteria, 5 public datasets are selected. After data pre-processing, details of each selected public dataset and the final composed dataset are shown in “Dataset Statistic Analysis Document”. The document summarized the malicious and legitimate traffic size we selected from each selected public dataset, proportions of selected traffic size from each selected public dataset with respect to the total traffic size of the composed dataset (% w.r.t the composed dataset), proportions of selected encrypted traffic size from each selected public dataset (% of selected public dataset), and total traffic size of the composed dataset. From the table, we are able to observe that each public dataset equally contributes to approximately 20% of the composed dataset, except for CICDS-2012 (due to its limited number of encrypted malicious traffic). This achieves a balance across individual datasets and reduces bias towards traffic belonging to any dataset during learning. We can also observe that the size of malicious and legitimate traffic are almost the same, thus achieving class balance. The datasets now made available were prepared aiming at encrypted malicious traffic detection. Since the dataset is used for machine learning model training, a sample of train and test sets are also provided. The train and test datasets are separated based on 1:4 and stratification is applied during data split. Such datasets can be used directly for machine or deep learning model training based on selected features.

In Bangladesh, people are sadly not very much concerned about traffic rules. This study focuses on traffic flow patterns at two junctions in Dhaka, Shapla Chattar and Notre Dame College. Footover bridges at both junctions were used to collect video data, which captured single-lane and double-lane traffic situations involving different types of vehicles and also pedestrians crossing. The dataset comprises approximately 5774 images extracted from the videos, taken at five different time periods on a weekday. This dataset provides a unique view on traffic situations in Dhaka, Bangladesh, by presenting unstructured traffic environments at two busy consecutive junctions. Monitoring vehicle fitness, examining pedestrian behavior, and measuring vehicle flow are all possible applications. Researchers can use different machine learning techniques in these areas.

The census count of vehicles on city streets is normally reported in the form of Average Daily Traffic (ADT) counts. These counts provide a good estimate for the actual number of vehicles on an average weekday at select street segments. Specific block segments are selected for a count because they are deemed as representative of a larger segment on the same roadway. ADT counts are used by transportation engineers, economists, real estate agents, planners, and others professionals for planning and operational analysis. The frequency for each count varies depending on City staff’s needs for analysis in any given area. This report covers the counts taken in our City during the past 12 years approximately.

You can also access an API version of this dataset.

TMS

(traffic monitoring system) daily-updated traffic counts API

Important note: due to the size of this dataset, you won't be able to open it fully in Excel. Use notepad / R / any software package which can open more than a million rows.

Data reuse caveats: as per license.

Data quality

statement: please read the accompanying user manual, explaining:

how

 this data is collected identification 

 of count stations traffic 

 monitoring technology monitoring 

 hierarchy and conventions typical 

 survey specification data 

 calculation TMS 

 operation. 

Traffic

monitoring for state highways: user manual

[PDF 465 KB]

The data is at daily granularity. However, the actual update

frequency of the data depends on the contract the site falls within. For telemetry

sites it's once a week on a Wednesday. Some regional sites are fortnightly, and

some monthly or quarterly. Some are only 4 weeks a year, with timing depending

on contractors’ programme of work.

Data quality caveats: you must use this data in

conjunction with the user manual and the following caveats.

The

 road sensors used in data collection are subject to both technical errors and 

 environmental interference.Data 

 is compiled from a variety of sources. Accuracy may vary and the data 

 should only be used as a guide.As 

 not all road sections are monitored, a direct calculation of Vehicle 

 Kilometres Travelled (VKT) for a region is not possible.Data 

 is sourced from Waka Kotahi New Zealand Transport Agency TMS data.For 

 sites that use dual loops classification is by length. Vehicles with a length of less than 5.5m are 

 classed as light vehicles. Vehicles over 11m long are classed as heavy 

 vehicles. Vehicles between 5.5 and 11m are split 50:50 into light and 

 heavy.In September 2022, the National Telemetry contract was handed to a new contractor. During the handover process, due to some missing documents and aged technology, 40 of the 96 national telemetry traffic count sites went offline. Current contractor has continued to upload data from all active sites and have gradually worked to bring most offline sites back online. Please note and account for possible gaps in data from National Telemetry Sites. 

The NZTA Vehicle

Classification Relationships diagram below shows the length classification (typically dual loops) and axle classification (typically pneumatic tube counts),

and how these map to the Monetised benefits and costs manual, table A37,

page 254.

Monetised benefits and costs manual [PDF 9 MB]

For the full TMS

classification schema see Appendix A of the traffic counting manual vehicle

classification scheme (NZTA 2011), below.

Traffic monitoring for state highways: user manual [PDF 465 KB]

State highway traffic monitoring (map)

State highway traffic monitoring sites

This dataset contains measures of traffic volume per census tract and ZIP code tabulation area (ZCTA) in the United States from 1963 to 2019 (primarily 1997 to 2019). High traffic volume may be used as a proxy for heavy traffic, high traffic speeds, and impediments to walking or biking. The dataset contains measures of the average, maximum, and minimum traffic volume per year or per ZCTA per year. These figures are available for all streets, highways, and non-highways. In the ZCTA dataset, data is collected intermittently across locations over time, therefore traffic volume has been interpolated for years in which no measures are available. Data Source: Traffic volume measurements are derived from Kalibrate's TrafficMetrix database accessed via Esri Demographics. Census tract boundaries come from the 2010 TIGER/Line shapefiles. ZCTA boundaries come from the 2019 TIGER/Line shapefiles.

HCAADT represents current (most recent) Heavy Commercial Annual Average Daily Traffic on sampled road systems. This information is displayed using the Traffic Count Locs Active feature class as of the annual HPMS freeze in January. Historical HCAADT is found in another table. Please note that updates to this dataset are on an annual basis, therefore the data may not match ground conditions or may not be available for new roadways. Resource Contact: John Hackett, Traffic Forecasting & Analysis (TFA), http://www.dot.state.mn.us/tda/contacts.html#TFA

Check other metadata records in this package for more information on Heavy Commercial Annual Average Daily Traffic Locations Information.


Link to ESRI Feature Service:

Heavy Commercial Annual Average Daily Traffic Locations in Minnesota: Heavy Commercial Annual Average Daily Traffic Locations

This dataset contains the historical estimated congestion for over 1,000 traffic segments, starting 6/11/2024 (except for a single time slice on 3/8/2024). Older records are in https://data.cityofchicago.org/d/sxs8-h27x. The most recent estimates for each segment are in https://data.cityofchicago.org/d/n4j6-wkkf.

The Chicago Traffic Tracker estimates traffic congestion on Chicago’s arterial streets (non-freeway streets) in real-time by continuously monitoring and analyzing GPS traces received from Chicago Transit Authority (CTA) buses. Two types of congestion estimates are produced every 10 minutes: 1) by Traffic Segments and 2) by Traffic Regions or Zones. Congestion estimates by traffic segments gives observed speed typically for one-half mile of a street in one direction of traffic. Traffic Segment level congestion is available for about 300 miles of principal arterials.

Congestion by Traffic Region gives the average traffic condition for all arterial street segments within a region. A traffic region is comprised of two or three community areas with comparable traffic patterns. 29 regions are created to cover the entire city (except O’Hare airport area). There is much volatility in traffic segment speed. However, the congestion estimates for the traffic regions remain consistent for a relatively longer period. Most volatility in arterial speed comes from the very nature of the arterials themselves. Due to a myriad of factors, including but not limited to frequent intersections, traffic signals, transit movements, availability of alternative routes, crashes, short length of the segments, etc. Speed on individual arterial segments can fluctuate from heavily congested to no congestion and back in a few minutes.

The segment speed and traffic region congestion estimates together may give a better understanding of the actual traffic conditions.

Annual average daily traffic is the total volume for the year divided by 365 days. The traffic count year is from October 1st through September 30th. Very few locations in California are actually counted continuously. Traffic Counting is generally performed by electronic counting instruments moved from location throughout the State in a program of continuous traffic count sampling. The resulting counts are adjusted to an estimate of annual average daily traffic by compensating for seasonal influence, weekly variation and other variables which may be present. Annual ADT is necessary for presenting a statewide picture of traffic flow, evaluating traffic trends, computing accident rates. planning and designing highways and other purposes.Traffic Census Program Page

In Bangladesh, general public compliance with traffic regulations is notably low. This dataset aims to analyze the traffic flow patterns in Dhaka, focusing on both vehicular movement and pedestrian activities. Data were gathered from four different locations: Shapla Chattar, Arambag, Bashabo, and Abul Hotel. Video recordings were taken from footover bridges, capturing traffic scenarios involving single-lane and double-lane roads, as well as the erratic movement of pedestrians. A total of 23,678 images were extracted from these recordings, which were collected during five distinct time intervals on a weekday, and subsequently annotated using the Roboflow tool. This dataset offers a detailed perspective on Dhaka’s unstructured traffic systems, highlighting various road conditions and heavy traffic environments. Its applications include vehicle fitness monitoring, pedestrian behavior analysis, and traffic flow assessment under diverse environmental conditions, such as daylight, dusk, night, and rain. Additionally, this dataset presents opportunities for researchers to explore and apply machine learning techniques to complex, real-world traffic scenarios. Readme file contains folder hierarchy of our dataset.

This dataset contains the current estimated congestion for the 29 traffic regions. For a detailed description, please go to https://tas.chicago.gov, click the About button at the bottom of the page, and then the MAP LAYERS tab.

The Chicago Traffic Tracker estimates traffic congestion on Chicago’s arterial streets (non-freeway streets) in real-time by continuously monitoring and analyzing GPS traces received from Chicago Transit Authority (CTA) buses. Two types of congestion estimates are produced every 10 minutes: 1) by Traffic Segments and 2) by Traffic Regions or Zones. Congestion estimates by traffic segments gives observed speed typically for one-half mile of a street in one direction of traffic. Traffic Segment level congestion is available for about 300 miles of principal arterials. Congestion by Traffic Region gives the average traffic condition for all arterial street segments within a region. A traffic region is comprised of two or three community areas with comparable traffic patterns. 29 regions are created to cover the entire city (except O’Hare airport area).

There is much volatility in traffic segment speed. However, the congestion estimates for the traffic regions remain consistent for a relatively longer period. Most volatility in arterial speed comes from the very nature of the arterials themselves. Due to a myriad of factors, including but not limited to frequent intersections, traffic signals, transit movements, availability of alternative routes, crashes, short length of the segments, etc. Speed on individual arterial segments can fluctuate from heavily congested to no congestion and back in a few minutes. The segment speed and traffic region congestion estimates together may give a better understanding of the actual traffic conditions.

Traffic Volumes from SCATS Traffic Management System Jul-Dec 2022 DCC. Published by Dublin City Council. Available under the license cc-by (CC-BY-4.0).Traffic volumes data across Dublin City from the SCATS traffic management system. The Sydney Coordinated Adaptive Traffic System (SCATS) is an intelligent transportation system used to manage timing of signal phases at traffic signals. SCATS uses sensors at each traffic signal to detect vehicle presence in each lane and pedestrians waiting to cross at the local site. The vehicle sensors are generally inductive loops installed within the road.

For SCATS junctions locations see: https://data.smartdublin.ie/dataset/traffic-signals-and-scats-sites-locations-dcc

NB These are large data files. There would be too many rows for downloading with certain programmes such as Excel. Please choose a software package which can manage such large data files.

3 resources are provided:

SCATS Traffic Volumes Data (Monthly) Contained in this report are traffic counts taken from the SCATS traffic detectors located at junctions. The primary function for these traffic detectors is for traffic signal control. Such devices can also count general traffic volumes at defined locations on approach to a junction. These devices are set at specific locations on approaches to the junction but may not be on all approaches to a junction. As there are multiple junctions on any one route, it could be expected that a vehicle would be counted multiple times as it progress along the route. Thus the traffic volume counts here are best used to represent trends in vehicle movement by selecting a specific junction on the route which best represents the overall traffic flows.

Information provided:

End Time: time that one hour count period finishes.

Region: location of the detector site (e.g. North City, West City, etc).

Site: this can be matched with the SCATS Sites file to show location

Detector: the detectors/ sensors at each site are numbered

Sum volume: total traffic volumes in preceding hour

Avg volume: average traffic volumes per 5 minute interval in preceding hour

All Dates Traffic Volumes Data

This file contains daily totals of traffic flow at each site location.

SCATS Site Location Data Contained in this report, the location data for the SCATS sites is provided. The meta data provided includes the following;

Site id – This is a unique identifier for each junction on SCATS

Site description( CAP) – Descriptive location of the junction containing street name(s) intersecting streets

Site description (lower) - – Descriptive location of the junction containing street name(s) intersecting streets

Region – The area of the city, adjoining local authority, region that the site is located

LAT/LONG – Coordinates

Disclaimer: the location files are regularly updated to represent the locations of SCATS sites under the control of Dublin City Council. However site accuracy is not absolute. Information for LAT/LONG and region may not be available for all sites contained. It is at the discretion of the user to link the files for analysis and to create further data. Furthermore, detector communication issues or faulty detectors could also result in an inaccurate result for a given period, so values should not be taken as absolute but can be used to indicate trends.

...

Analysis of ‘Popular Website Traffic Over Time ’ provided by Analyst-2 (analyst-2.ai), based on source dataset retrieved from https://www.kaggle.com/yamqwe/popular-website-traffice on 13 February 2022.

--- Dataset description provided by original source is as follows ---

About this dataset

Background

Have you every been in a conversation and the question comes up, who uses Bing? This question comes up occasionally because people wonder if these sites have any views. For this research study, we are going to be exploring popular website traffic for many popular websites.

Methodology

The data collected originates from SimilarWeb.com.

Source

For the analysis and study, go to The Concept Center

This dataset was created by Chase Willden and contains around 0 samples along with 1/1/2017, Social Media, technical information and other features such as: - 12/1/2016 - 3/1/2017 - and more.

How to use this dataset

• Analyze 11/1/2016 in relation to 2/1/2017
• Study the influence of 4/1/2017 on 1/1/2017
• More datasets

Acknowledgements

If you use this dataset in your research, please credit Chase Willden

Start A New Notebook!

--- Original source retains full ownership of the source dataset ---

The City of Perth traffic count provides information about the number of vehicles, speed of travel and peak travel numbers on particular roads within the Perth LGA (Local Government Area). Show full description

Traffic census for the Queensland state-declared road network showing annual average traffic counts and heavy vehicle counts.

The location of traffic count sites across selected roads on the road network. This layer provides the average number of vehicles and heavy vehicles for the latest year of traffic data available. The traffic volumes in this layer are expressed as the average number of vehicles at each location on a typical weekday (Monday to Friday) for the metropolitan area, and a typical day (Monday to Sunday) for regions outside the metropolitan area.Main Roads undertakes traffic counting throughout Western Australia. Strategic locations are monitored on a continuous basis and are referred to as Network Performance Sites (NPS). Sampling of the wider network is performed using portable equipment over a short period. Although many Local Government roads are counted the focus is on providing information about the State road network. The Integrated Road Information System (IRIS) Reporting Centre provides a number of reports that provide traffic volume and vehicle classification reports.Note that you are accessing this data pursuant to a Creative Commons (Attribution) Licence which has a disclaimer of warranties and limitation of liability. You accept that the data provided pursuant to the Licence is subject to changes.Pursuant to section 3 of the Licence you are provided with the following notice to be included when you Share the Licenced Material:- The Commissioner of Main Roads is the creator and owner of the data and Licenced Material, which is accessed pursuant to a Creative Commons (Attribution) Licence, which has a disclaimer of warranties and limitation of liability.Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Background

Vehicular traffic congestion remains a major problem in most modern cities of the world. Therefore, efforts to minimize these congestions and their accompanying effects continuously receive much attention from researchers, traffic engineers, policymakers, etc.

One important element required in the efforts of traffic engineering for the minimization of traffic congestion is data. Data influence the modeling and deployment of traffic scheduling systems. Most importantly, the objectives of modeling and deploying the traffic scheduling system influence the nature of the data to be used.

Aim

The aim of this study was to generate and provide a dataset that may be used in the training of computationally intelligent systems having basic objects of minimizing waiting time, travel time, etc. at various intersections (isolated intersections or roundabouts).

Methodology

The dataset (.csv) consisted of waiting time (W), queue length (Q), and phase duration (P). The waiting time is the time duration vehicles have waited at an intersection/roundabout before being scheduled to utilize the intersection/roundabout. The queue length refers to the number of vehicles (vehicular count) waiting at an intersection/roundabout. Phase duration is the time period a given vehicular flow (lane) is assigned the green wave to utilize the intersection/roundabout. The dataset was obtained through repeated training, testing, and modification of phase duration and the Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) model.

The dataset considered bounded conditions on the three parameters (W, Q, P). The W and Q were bounded between zero and ninety – [0, 90] and the P is [13, 50]. That is, when W and Q are greater than or equal to the upper bound, the upper bound is used. Every flow may be assigned a minimum P of 13s and a maximum of 50s. The P-bounds assumed that the lower bound is large enough for vehicles on the assigned traffic flow to move to the safe region of the intersection before the scheduling system switches assignment to another traffic flow.

Conclusion

The dataset may be used as a benchmark dataset for the improvement of traffic flow controllers as well as other datasets.

Queensland average daily traffic volume data for state-controlled roads broken down by hour of day and day of week as an average volume for the year prescribed.