Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Eggs US fell to 1.80 USD/Dozen on September 22, 2025, down 3.72% from the previous day. Over the past month, Eggs US's price has fallen 16.92%, and is down 21.50% compared to the same time last year, according to trading on a contract for difference (CFD) that tracks the benchmark market for this commodity. This dataset includes a chart with historical data for Eggs US.
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/legal/#copyright-public-domainhttps://fred.stlouisfed.org/legal/#copyright-public-domain
Large white, Grade A chicken eggs, sold in a carton of a dozen. Includes organic, non-organic, cage free, free range, and traditional."
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Eggs CH fell to 3,003 CNY/T on September 22, 2025, down 1.15% from the previous day. Over the past month, Eggs CH's price has risen 1.62%, but it is still 27.16% lower than a year ago, according to trading on a contract for difference (CFD) that tracks the benchmark market for this commodity. This dataset includes a chart with historical data for Eggs CH.
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/legal/#copyright-public-domainhttps://fred.stlouisfed.org/legal/#copyright-public-domain
Large white, Grade A chicken eggs, sold in a carton of a dozen. Includes organic, non-organic, cage free, free range, and traditional."
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Imports of Daily Products & Eggs in the United States increased to 342.79 USD Million in February from 311.05 USD Million in January of 2024. This dataset includes a chart with historical data for the United States Imports of Daily Products & Eggs.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Exports of Dairy Products & Eggs in the United States increased to 604.50 USD Million in February from 573.78 USD Million in January of 2024. This dataset includes a chart with historical data for the United States Exports of Dairy Products & Eggs.
Monthly average retail prices for selected products, for Canada and provinces. Prices are presented for the current month and the previous four months. Prices are based on transaction data from Canadian retailers, and are presented in Canadian current dollars.
This publication gives quarterly information on egg production, usage and prices. This includes UK egg packing station throughput by country and egg production system (intensive, barn, free range, organic) and prices paid by UK egg packers to producers. The information about egg usage includes the number of eggs bought by UK egg processors and the quantity of egg products they produce. Monthly information about trade in eggs and egg products is also included.
Data from the egg production statistics are an invaluable evidence base for policy makers, academics and researchers. The data is also heavily relied upon by representatives of the egg and poultry industry. The egg production data is used for egg production volumes and egg type, as these are key sector indicators for the British Egg Industry Council (BEIC) since they reflect the size of the national laying flock. The British Free Range Egg Producers Association also makes heavy use of our data as it indicates the size of the free-range sector.
As part of our ongoing commitment to compliance with the https://code.statisticsauthority.gov.uk/" class="govuk-link">Code of Practice for Official Statistics we wish to strengthen our engagement with users of the egg production data and better understand the use made of them and the types of decisions that they inform. Consequently, we invite users to register as a user of the egg production data, so that we can retain your details and inform you of any new releases and provide you with the opportunity to take part in user engagement activities that we may run. If you would like to register as a user of the egg production data, please provide your details in the attached form.
Next update: see the statistics release calendar
For further information please contact:
julie.rumsey@defra.gov.uk
https://X.com/defrastats" class="govuk-link">X: @DefraStats
The evolutionary drivers underlying marked variation in the pigmentation of eggs within many avian species remains unclear. The leading hypotheses proposed to explain such variation advocate the roles of genetic differences, signalling and/or structural integrity. One means of testing amongst these hypotheses is to capitalise on museum collections of eggs obtained throughout a broad geographic range of a species to ensure sufficient variation in predictors pertaining to each hypothesis. Here we measured colouration and patterning in eggs from 271 clutches of Australian Magpies (Cracticus tibicen) collected across most of their geographic range of ca. 7 million km2; encompassing eight subspecies, variation in environmental parameters, and the presence/ absence of a brood parasite. We found considerable variation in background colour, as well as in the extent and distribution of patterning across eggs. There was little evidence that this variation was explained by subspecies. However, we ..., Correction Notice: An error in data manipulation was identified and corrected. A correction has been applied to this article (April 2024), approved by RSOS, and the data has been updated to reflect this correction.Â
MagpieCode2024 Clean R Code for all Magpie analyses. MagpieCombinedData2024 Clean and corrected colour dataset and maculation dataset. OutlierDataset2024 Outlier dataset.Â
 , , # Data from: Unscrambling variation in avian eggshell colour and patterning in a continent-wide study
https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.q3b7b78
MagpieCode2024
Clean R Code for all Magpie analyses (R).
MagpieCombinedData2024
Clean and corrected colour dataset and maculation dataset (csv).
OutlierDataset2024
Outlier dataset (csv).
Â
Data was derived from the following sources:
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Context
The dataset tabulates the Egg Harbor population over the last 20 plus years. It lists the population for each year, along with the year on year change in population, as well as the change in percentage terms for each year. The dataset can be utilized to understand the population change of Egg Harbor across the last two decades. For example, using this dataset, we can identify if the population is declining or increasing. If there is a change, when the population peaked, or if it is still growing and has not reached its peak. We can also compare the trend with the overall trend of United States population over the same period of time.
Key observations
In 2023, the population of Egg Harbor was 371, a 2.20% increase year-by-year from 2022. Previously, in 2022, Egg Harbor population was 363, an increase of 0.28% compared to a population of 362 in 2021. Over the last 20 plus years, between 2000 and 2023, population of Egg Harbor increased by 115. In this period, the peak population was 371 in the year 2023. The numbers suggest that the population has not reached its peak yet and is showing a trend of further growth. Source: U.S. Census Bureau Population Estimates Program (PEP).
When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau Population Estimates Program (PEP).
Data Coverage:
Variables / Data Columns
Good to know
Margin of Error
Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.
Custom data
If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.
Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.
This dataset is a part of the main dataset for Egg Harbor Population by Year. You can refer the same here
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Context
The dataset presents the distribution of median household income among distinct age brackets of householders in Egg Harbor town. Based on the latest 2018-2022 5-Year Estimates from the American Community Survey, it displays how income varies among householders of different ages in Egg Harbor town. It showcases how household incomes typically rise as the head of the household gets older. The dataset can be utilized to gain insights into age-based household income trends and explore the variations in incomes across households.
Key observations: Insights from 2022
In terms of income distribution across age cohorts, in Egg Harbor town, the median household income stands at $95,014 for householders within the 45 to 64 years age group, followed by $69,199 for the 65 years and over age group. Notably, householders within the 25 to 44 years age group, had the lowest median household income at $54,992.
When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2018-2022 5-Year Estimates. All incomes have been adjusting for inflation and are presented in 2023-inflation-adjusted dollars.
Age groups classifications include:
Variables / Data Columns
Good to know
Margin of Error
Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.
Custom data
If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.
Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.
This dataset is a part of the main dataset for Egg Harbor town median household income by age. You can refer the same here
U.S. Government Workshttps://www.usa.gov/government-works
License information was derived automatically
A long-term, multi-season, fish egg sampling program is conducted annually on the Detroit, Saint Clair, and Saint Marys rivers to identify where productive fish spawning habitat currently exists and evaluate habitat restoration projects. Egg mats were placed on the river bottom during the spring and fall at historic spawning areas, candidate fish spawning habitat restoration sites, and completed spawning habitat restoration sites throughout the rivers. Egg mats were placed in US and Canadian waters. Widespread evidence was found of lithophilic spawning by numerous native fish species, including walleye (Sander vitreus), lake whitefish (Coregonus clupeaformis), lake sturgeon (Acipenser fulvescens), suckers (Family: Catostomidae), and trout-perch (Percopsis omiscomaycus). The data describe the number, density, date of collection, and exact collection location of fish eggs collected in the St. Clair (2010-2024), Detroit (2005-2024), and St. Marys rivers (2018-2022).
With these data, I evaluated the effects of parental photoperiod and offspring environment on prolonged egg diapause, embryonic development and hatching over nine years in natural settings populated by Mormon crickets in the Bighorn Mountains of Wyoming.On July 9, 2015, Mormon crickets were collected on Paint Rock Road (44° 27' 48.853" N, 107° 27' 38.279" W, 2654 m) in the Bighorn Mountains as 7th instar nymphs and reared in the laboratory at 15:9h light:dark, warming to 30°C during the day and cooling to 24°C at night. Adult females were paired with adult males and each pair was housed in a nylon mesh cage (30x21x21 cm) with a 20x20 cm aluminum pan filled with clean, dry sand for egg laying. Mating pairs were split between two photoperiod treatments: 19 pairs were designated long day (LD) adults and placed in an environmental chamber with a 15:9h light:dark cycle; 20 pairs were designated short day (SD) adults and placed in a second environmental chamber with 12:12h light:dark. Eggs from 12 SD pairs were sifted from the sand on September 3 and the same number of eggs from each pair (n=2, 2, 3, 7, 7, 7, 7, 7, 9, 9, 11, and 14 eggs) was buried approximately 2 cm beneath the surface in seven sand-filled 10 cm, plastic plant pots (height 8.9 cm, volume 500 ml) for a total of 85 eggs per pot. The pots had a 7.3 cm diameter, plastic mesh net covering the drainage hole at the bottom and a 20 cm diameter Lumite net (1.5 mm mesh, SI Corporation, Gainesville, Georgia) covering the 10 cm diameter, open top, fastened by cable ties around the waist of the pot to prevent small animals from entering and hatched nymphs from escaping. Similarly, eggs from 14 LD pairs were sifted from the sand on September 3 and split evenly between seven sand-filled plastic pots (number of eggs from each pair per pot: n=1, 1, 1, 1, 3, 3, 3, 4, 7, 7, 8, 11, 11, and 13 eggs) for a total of 74 eggs per pot. A temperature datalogger (Maxim 1922L thermochron) was buried 2 cm beneath the surface in each LD egg pot. One SD and one LD pot were set side by side in the ground on September 9 or September 10 at seven locations (Table 1) in the Bighorn Mountains, Wyoming with the top of each pot even with the ground surface and covered by a galvanized steel hardware cloth (6 mm mesh, 18 x 18 cm) stapled at four corners into the ground to prevent large animals from disturbing the pot of eggs.In late August or early September of each year that followed (2016-2024), the pots were collected, the sand from each pot was dumped into an aluminum cake pan, and air dried overnight. The eggs were examined with the aid of a dissecting scope and categorized into hatched, failed hatch (nymph opened but did not exit egg shell), fully developed (with the eyespot at the end of the egg), half-developed (with the eyespot halfway along the egg), undeveloped (no eyespot visible), dark and flat, fungus, broken, and missing. In four instances, a parasitoid exit hole was also noted. Temperature data loggers were downloaded annually and replaced as needed. In 2016 to 2018, all of the eggs except those that had hatched, failed hatch, or broken were reburied in the pot. From 2019 onwards, eggs that were hatched, failed hatch, broken, or dark, flat, and appearing inviable were discarded (eggs with fungus were returned to the pots). Pots were returned to the same locations where they were collected on the day the eggs were reviewed or the following day.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Context
The dataset tabulates the Egg Harbor City population over the last 20 plus years. It lists the population for each year, along with the year on year change in population, as well as the change in percentage terms for each year. The dataset can be utilized to understand the population change of Egg Harbor City across the last two decades. For example, using this dataset, we can identify if the population is declining or increasing. If there is a change, when the population peaked, or if it is still growing and has not reached its peak. We can also compare the trend with the overall trend of United States population over the same period of time.
Key observations
In 2023, the population of Egg Harbor City was 4,385, a 0.16% decrease year-by-year from 2022. Previously, in 2022, Egg Harbor City population was 4,392, an increase of 0.11% compared to a population of 4,387 in 2021. Over the last 20 plus years, between 2000 and 2023, population of Egg Harbor City decreased by 102. In this period, the peak population was 4,487 in the year 2000. The numbers suggest that the population has already reached its peak and is showing a trend of decline. Source: U.S. Census Bureau Population Estimates Program (PEP).
When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau Population Estimates Program (PEP).
Data Coverage:
Variables / Data Columns
Good to know
Margin of Error
Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.
Custom data
If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.
Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.
This dataset is a part of the main dataset for Egg Harbor City Population by Year. You can refer the same here
Moon Snail egg collars were collected in SW Florida in 2024. DNA was extracted and sequenced to understand the microbiota of the collars.
Females are expected to balance the benefits of current reproductive investment against the costs of that investment for future reproduction. Egg size may be subject to this trade-off, the outcome of which may depend on the intrinsic characteristics of the laying female or the environmental conditions that she encounters, such as weather and food supply. In addition, a female’s social environment may affect egg investment: in several cooperatively breeding species, females adjust egg investment according to the availability of help at the nest. In this study, we used long-term data and a field experiment to investigate the factors influencing egg size in the long-tailed tit Aegithalos caudatus, a cooperative breeder with a redirected helping system and relatively variable egg size. We show that females laid eggs of a consistent size within and across clutches, and that skeletally larger females laid larger eggs. However, we found no evidence that environmental conditions or social envir..., These data come from a study conducted on a population of long-tailed tits (Aegithalos caudatus) in the Rivelin Valley, Sheffield, UK (53°23’N, 1°34’ W) between 2011 and 2024. The key variable we were investigating was egg mass, used as a measure of females' per-egg reproductive investment. Individuals were ringed with unique colour combinations under British Trust for Ornithology licence, allowing them to be identified and their reproductive attempts monitored. During each year’s breeding season (late February-early June), nests were located by following adult birds and monitored every 1-3 days. Once lined, nests were checked manually for eggs and the laying date of the first egg was recorded. Approximately eleven days later (mean ± SD = 11.03 ± 0.95 days after clutch initiation, n = 152 clutches), following clutch completion, the size of the clutch was recorded, and all eggs were temporarily extracted from the nest using a spoon and weighed to the nearest 0.001g with a Tanita 123..., , # Data from: Drivers of variation in egg size in a cooperative breeder with a redirected helping system
https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.nvx0k6f31
Our study explores the factors driving variation in egg mass in long-tailed tits (Aegithalos caudatus), a cooperative breeder with an atypical redirected helping system. We include an analysis of a long-term dataset spanning 2011-2024 and a supplementary feeding experiment between 2022-2023.
Description:
For each breeding attempt, every row is identical except in the egg_mass column, which represents the different masses of each egg in that particular clutch. Missing data: NA
Variables:
This data set contains Lake Trout (Salvelinus namaycush) egg density estimates obtained from suction sampling across five locations in Lake Ontario. These data were collected in October-November 2020 and November-December 2024 as part of an effort to identify Lake Trout spawning locations and habitat preference in Lake Ontario. Additional information on habitat characteristics at each sampling site was collected using an underwater camera and was classified using the Coastal and Marine Ecological Classification Standard (CMECS). The two files in this data set include a comma delimited machine-readable file (*.csv) containing the Lake Trout egg density estimates and substrate classification data, and an XML file containing the metadata information.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Sale-Or-Purchase-of-Stock Time Series for Vital Farms Inc. Vital Farms, Inc., a food company, packages, markets, and distributes shell eggs, butter, and other products in the United States. It produces products sourced from animals raised on family farms, including shell eggs, butter, hard-boiled eggs, and liquid whole eggs under the Vital Farms brand and other trade names. The company provides its products through third parties and direct to retailers, and commercial and non-commercial foodservice operators. Vital Farms, Inc. was founded in 2007 and is headquartered in Austin, Texas.
With these data, I evaluated whether the diet of Mormon cricket parents affected the diapause and development rate of the eggs that they laid. This was completed with two lab experiments. The first was a ten year experiment conducted at the ARS Northern Plains Agricultural Laboratory in Sidney Montana on a population from Utah (UT, 38.4249 N, 112.8618 W, 1853 m above sea level). Eggs were laid in the lab by males and females collected from the field, and hatched F1 nymphs were fed natural diet until they molted to 7th instar when they were sexed and randomly assigned one of three diet treatments. We prepared diets consisting of 42% macronutrients (protein P and carbohydrates C, in select ratios of P:C), 54% cellulose, 1.8% Wesson’s salt mixture, and 2.2% vitamins, linoleic acid, and cholesterol. We gave each insect one of three diet treatments: 2:1, 1:1, and 1:2 P:C (which we label hi P, PC, and hi C, respectively). They were given this diet until they were 9 day old adults. On June 3, 2013, three females of each diet treatment were paired with males of the same diet treatment (e.g., hi C females were paired with hi C males) and each pair of adults was placed in a nylon cage with a pan of dry sand to mate and lay eggs.The F2 eggs were collected on July 26, 2013, placed in 25% moistened sand (as above) in a cup marked with the parentage and covered with a lid. One PC female died shortly after being placed in the mating cage and had no eggs; the other mating pairs were alive when the eggs were collected. We placed the eggs in a seasonal temperature program which is best described as 6 weeks of winter, 2 weeks of spring, 10 weeks of summer, and 2 weeks of autumn. The temperature program is then repeated. Eggs were screened for development in the final two weeks of each cycle (the autumn period), and the developed eggs were separated from the undeveloped eggs. Half-developed eggs were also separated from the undeveloped eggs to follow the completion of their development separately. For each egg in the sibling group, we tracked the timing of the fate of each egg: either fully developed (and thus ready to enter winter and hatch the following spring), discard (due to being flat, black, or invaded by fungus), broken, or missing. For some mating pairs, we also collected a few eggs and fixed them, which killed the eggs, but cleared the chorion so that we could review their developmental stages (fate=fixed). The temperature treatments were applied for approximately 10 calendar years starting in 2013 when the eggs were collected and ending in April 2024.The second experiment was conducted at the ARS Northern Plains Agricultural Laboratory in Sidney Montana on a population from Wyoming (WY, 44.8264 N, 107.8280 W, 2773 m a.s.l). To vary maternal diets for this study, Mormon crickets were caged with or without Northern grasshoppers (Melanoplus borealis) in thirty-two 1 m2 cages on a mountain meadow on Forest Service Road 14 (FSR 14), Bighorn County, Wyoming (location given above). Northern grasshopper 3rd and a few 4th instar nymphs were collected from FSR 14 and placed into cages on June 29, 2018 at densities of 0, 9, 18, and 27 grasshoppers m-2. In order to examine the effects of Mormon cricket density, an equal number of male and female Mormon cricket nymphs (2nd or 3rd instars) were added to the cages on FSR 14 on July 1 at combined densities of 6 and 12 m-2. The thirty-two cages amounted to four replicates of each grasshopper x Mormon cricket density treatment. Adult Mormon crickets were collected from the cages on August 28, 2018 and transported to the insect rearing facility in Sidney, Montana.To measure development rate as a function of temperature, I aimed to collect five eggs per treatment temperature from 15 mating pairs. Eggs oviposited in the previous 24 h were sifted from the sand and placed in a petri dish with filter paper moistened with water, covered with a lid, and sealed with parafilm. Twelve females oviposited enough eggs to fill all eight temperature treatments (averaging 4.6 eggs per treatment temperature); three females only had enough to fill five or six of the temperature treatments. For each mating pair, eight petri dishes were marked to indicate the source mating pair, date set up, and one of eight treatment temperatures (Tmean): 22:14°C (Tmean=18°C), 24:16°C (Tmean=20°C), 26:18°C (Tmean=22°C), 28:20°C (24°C), 30:22°C (26°C), 32:24°C (28°C), 34:26°C (30°C), and 36:28°C (32°C). Each of eight incubators cycled between 12 h warm and 12 h cool about its Tmean in continuous darkness. Initially, development of embryos was scored every three to four days beginning at day 34 from when the eggs were laid. The developing eyespot was the first embryonic tissue visible with aid of a dissecting scope. Eggs were given six months to show signs of development. None of the eggs at the lowest temperature (22:14°C) showed any development, and so I placed the same petri dishes of eggs in 38:30°C (Tmean=34°C) to measure development at this ninth experimental temperature with the explicit assumption that exposure to the cold temperature for six months did not affect development rate in this high temperature treatment. Development rate is the inverse of time in days from when the eggs were oviposited to Stage 19 when the cricket fills half of the egg. Relatively few embryos grew to stage 23 due to aestivation at high temperatures.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Ignition tracking data collected with Garmin GPS and Go Pro recorders for prescribed fire research. Ignitions for the Ft. Stewart 2024 prescribed burns were completed primarily with dragon eggs dropped from a helicopter, and the ground ignitions were completed with a terra torch attached to the back of a pickup truck. On the E11.5 burn unit the dragon ball hopper ran at the '2-Fast' speed setting until 15:04 Zulu time when the operator switched to '4-slow' speed setting for the remainder of that unit. On the E16 units the dragon ball hopper ran at the '4-slow' speed setting for the entire burn. The terra torch ignitions were used to set the black line, that is a line of fire set to have a backing fire burn a side of the unit that will "receive" the main ignitions by the helicopter. The remaining ignitions by the terra torch were used to "clean up/mop up" remaining areas around edges of the burn unit that did ignite due to local conditions (e.g. variability in the landscape).
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Eggs US fell to 1.80 USD/Dozen on September 22, 2025, down 3.72% from the previous day. Over the past month, Eggs US's price has fallen 16.92%, and is down 21.50% compared to the same time last year, according to trading on a contract for difference (CFD) that tracks the benchmark market for this commodity. This dataset includes a chart with historical data for Eggs US.