8 datasets found
  1. Data from: Influence of Sanctions and Opportunities on Rates of Bank...

    • icpsr.umich.edu
    • datasets.ai
    • +1more
    ascii
    Updated Feb 16, 1992
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Camp, George M.; Gould, LeRoy (1992). Influence of Sanctions and Opportunities on Rates of Bank Robbery, 1970-1975: [United States] [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08260.v1
    Explore at:
    asciiAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Feb 16, 1992
    Dataset provided by
    Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Researchhttps://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/pages/
    Authors
    Camp, George M.; Gould, LeRoy
    License

    https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/studies/8260/termshttps://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/studies/8260/terms

    Time period covered
    1970 - 1975
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    This study was designed to explain variations in crime rates and to examine the deterrent effects of sanctions on crime. The study concentrated on bank robberies, but it also examined burglaries and other kinds of robberies. In examining these effects the study condidered three sets of factors: (1) Economic considerations-- the cost/benefit factors that individuals consider in deciding whether or not to perform a crime, (2) Degree of anomie--the amount of alienation and isolation individuals feel toward society and the effect of these feelings on the individuals' performing a crime, and (3) Opportunity--the effect of exposure, attractiveness, and degree of guardianship on an object being taken. These factors were explored by gathering information on such topics as: crime clearance rates, arrests, and sentences, bank attributes, and socioeconomic and demographic information.

  2. g

    Jacob Kaplan's Concatenated Files: Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program...

    • datasearch.gesis.org
    • openicpsr.org
    Updated Feb 19, 2020
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Kaplan, Jacob (2020). Jacob Kaplan's Concatenated Files: Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program Data: Property Stolen and Recovered (Supplement to Return A) 1960-2017 [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.3886/E105403V3
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Feb 19, 2020
    Dataset provided by
    da|ra (Registration agency for social science and economic data)
    Authors
    Kaplan, Jacob
    Description

    For any questions about this data please email me at jacob@crimedatatool.com. If you use this data, please cite it.Version 3 release notes:Adds data in the following formats: Excel.Changes project name to avoid confusing this data for the ones done by NACJD.Version 2 release notes:Adds data for 2017.Adds a "number_of_months_reported" variable which says how many months of the year the agency reported data.Property Stolen and Recovered is a Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program data set with information on the number of offenses (crimes included are murder, rape, robbery, burglary, theft/larceny, and motor vehicle theft), the value of the offense, and subcategories of the offense (e.g. for robbery it is broken down into subcategories including highway robbery, bank robbery, gas station robbery). The majority of the data relates to theft. Theft is divided into subcategories of theft such as shoplifting, theft of bicycle, theft from building, and purse snatching. For a number of items stolen (e.g. money, jewelry and previous metals, guns), the value of property stolen and and the value for property recovered is provided. This data set is also referred to as the Supplement to Return A (Offenses Known and Reported). All the data was received directly from the FBI as text or .DTA files. I created a setup file based on the documentation provided by the FBI and read the data into R using the package asciiSetupReader. All work to clean the data and save it in various file formats was also done in R. For the R code used to clean this data, see here: https://github.com/jacobkap/crime_data. The Word document file available for download is the guidebook the FBI provided with the raw data which I used to create the setup file to read in data.There may be inaccuracies in the data, particularly in the group of columns starting with "auto." To reduce (but certainly not eliminate) data errors, I replaced the following values with NA for the group of columns beginning with "offenses" or "auto" as they are common data entry error values (e.g. are larger than the agency's population, are much larger than other crimes or months in same agency): 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000, 5000, 6000, 7000, 8000, 9000, 10000, 20000, 30000, 40000, 50000, 60000, 70000, 80000, 90000, 100000, 99942. This cleaning was NOT done on the columns starting with "value."For every numeric column I replaced negative indicator values (e.g. "j" for -1) with the negative number they are supposed to be. These negative number indicators are not included in the FBI's codebook for this data but are present in the data. I used the values in the FBI's codebook for the Offenses Known and Clearances by Arrest data.To make it easier to merge with other data, I merged this data with the Law Enforcement Agency Identifiers Crosswalk (LEAIC) data. The data from the LEAIC add FIPS (state, county, and place) and agency type/subtype. If an agency has used a different FIPS code in the past, check to make sure the FIPS code is the same as in this data.

  3. o

    Jacob Kaplan's Concatenated Files: Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program...

    • openicpsr.org
    Updated Aug 14, 2018
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Jacob Kaplan (2018). Jacob Kaplan's Concatenated Files: Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program Data: Property Stolen and Recovered (Supplement to Return A) 1960-2022 [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.3886/E105403V10
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Aug 14, 2018
    Dataset provided by
    Princeton University
    Authors
    Jacob Kaplan
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Time period covered
    1960 - 2020
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    For a comprehensive guide to this data and other UCR data, please see my book at ucrbook.comVersion 10 release notes:Adds 2022 dataVersion 9 release notes:Adds 2021 data.Version 8 release notes:Adds 2020 data. Please note that the FBI has retired UCR data ending in 2020 data so this will be the last Property Stolen and Recovered data they release. Changes .rda file to .rds.Version 7 release notes:Adds data for 2006.Version 6 release notesChanges release notes description, does not change data.Version 5 release notes:Adds data for 2019Note that the number of months reported variable sharply changes starting in 2018. This is probably due to changes in UCR reporting of the "status" variable which is used to generate the months missing county (the code I used does not change). So pre-2018 and 2018+ years may not be comparable for this variable. Version 4 release notes:Adds data for 2018Version 3 release notes:Adds data in the following formats: Excel.Changes project name to avoid confusing this data for the ones done by NACJD.Version 2 release notes:Adds data for 2017.Adds a "number_of_months_reported" variable which says how many months of the year the agency reported data.Property Stolen and Recovered is a Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program data set with information on the number of offenses (crimes included are murder, rape, robbery, burglary, theft/larceny, and motor vehicle theft), the value of the offense, and subcategories of the offense (e.g. for robbery it is broken down into subcategories including highway robbery, bank robbery, gas station robbery). The majority of the data relates to theft. Theft is divided into subcategories of theft such as shoplifting, theft of bicycle, theft from building, and purse snatching. For a number of items stolen (e.g. money, jewelry and previous metals, guns), the value of property stolen and and the value for property recovered is provided. This data set is also referred to as the Supplement to Return A (Offenses Known and Reported). All the data was received directly from the FBI as text or .DTA files. There may be inaccuracies in the data, particularly in the group of columns starting with "auto." To reduce (but certainly not eliminate) data errors, I replaced the following values with NA for the group of columns beginning with "offenses" or "auto" as they are common data entry error values (e.g. are larger than the agency's population, are much larger than other crimes or months in same agency): 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000, 5000, 6000, 7000, 8000, 9000, 10000, 20000, 30000, 40000, 50000, 60000, 70000, 80000, 90000, 100000, 99942. This cleaning was NOT done on the columns starting with "value."For every numeric column I replaced negative indicator values (e.g. "j" for -1) with the negative number they are supposed to be. These negative number indicators are not included in the FBI's codebook for this data but are present in the data. I used the values in the FBI's codebook for the Offenses Known and Clearances by Arrest data.To make it easier to merge with other data, I merged this data with the Law Enforcement Agency Identifiers Crosswalk (LEAIC) data. The data from the LEAIC add FIPS (state, county, and place) and agency type/subtype. If an agency has used a different FIPS code in the past, check to make sure the FIPS code is the same as in this data.

  4. g

    Jacob Kaplan's Concatenated Files: Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program...

    • datasearch.gesis.org
    • openicpsr.org
    Updated Feb 19, 2020
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Kaplan, Jacob (2020). Jacob Kaplan's Concatenated Files: Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program Data: Property Stolen and Recovered (Supplement to Return A) 1960-2018 [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.3886/E105403
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Feb 19, 2020
    Dataset provided by
    da|ra (Registration agency for social science and economic data)
    Authors
    Kaplan, Jacob
    Description

    For any questions about this data please email me at jacob@crimedatatool.com. If you use this data, please cite it.Version 4 release notes:Adds data for 2018Version 3 release notes:Adds data in the following formats: Excel.Changes project name to avoid confusing this data for the ones done by NACJD.Version 2 release notes:Adds data for 2017.Adds a "number_of_months_reported" variable which says how many months of the year the agency reported data.Property Stolen and Recovered is a Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program data set with information on the number of offenses (crimes included are murder, rape, robbery, burglary, theft/larceny, and motor vehicle theft), the value of the offense, and subcategories of the offense (e.g. for robbery it is broken down into subcategories including highway robbery, bank robbery, gas station robbery). The majority of the data relates to theft. Theft is divided into subcategories of theft such as shoplifting, theft of bicycle, theft from building, and purse snatching. For a number of items stolen (e.g. money, jewelry and previous metals, guns), the value of property stolen and and the value for property recovered is provided. This data set is also referred to as the Supplement to Return A (Offenses Known and Reported). All the data was received directly from the FBI as text or .DTA files. I created a setup file based on the documentation provided by the FBI and read the data into R using the package asciiSetupReader. All work to clean the data and save it in various file formats was also done in R. For the R code used to clean this data, see here: https://github.com/jacobkap/crime_data. The Word document file available for download is the guidebook the FBI provided with the raw data which I used to create the setup file to read in data.There may be inaccuracies in the data, particularly in the group of columns starting with "auto." To reduce (but certainly not eliminate) data errors, I replaced the following values with NA for the group of columns beginning with "offenses" or "auto" as they are common data entry error values (e.g. are larger than the agency's population, are much larger than other crimes or months in same agency): 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000, 5000, 6000, 7000, 8000, 9000, 10000, 20000, 30000, 40000, 50000, 60000, 70000, 80000, 90000, 100000, 99942. This cleaning was NOT done on the columns starting with "value."For every numeric column I replaced negative indicator values (e.g. "j" for -1) with the negative number they are supposed to be. These negative number indicators are not included in the FBI's codebook for this data but are present in the data. I used the values in the FBI's codebook for the Offenses Known and Clearances by Arrest data.To make it easier to merge with other data, I merged this data with the Law Enforcement Agency Identifiers Crosswalk (LEAIC) data. The data from the LEAIC add FIPS (state, county, and place) and agency type/subtype. If an agency has used a different FIPS code in the past, check to make sure the FIPS code is the same as in this data.

  5. o

    Jacob Kaplan's Concatenated Files: Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program...

    • openicpsr.org
    Updated Apr 21, 2021
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Jacob Kaplan (2021). Jacob Kaplan's Concatenated Files: Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program Data: Property Stolen and Recovered (Supplement to Return A) 1960-2019 [Dataset]. https://www.openicpsr.org/openicpsr/project/105403/version/V7/view;jsessionid=3A2F8BCA0A9187919FB93092B20B2C1D?path=/openicpsr/105403/fcr:versions/V7/ucr_property_stolen_recovered_yearly_1960_2019_dta.zip&type=file
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Apr 21, 2021
    Dataset provided by
    Princeton University
    Authors
    Jacob Kaplan
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Time period covered
    1960 - 2019
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    For a comprehensive guide to this data and other UCR data, please see my book at ucrbook.com

    Version 7 release notes:
    • Adds data for 2006.
    Version 6 release notes
    • Changes release notes description, does not change data.
    Version 5 release notes:
    • Adds data for 2019
    • Note that the number of months reported variable sharply changes starting in 2018. This is probably due to changes in UCR reporting of the "status" variable which is used to generate the months missing county (the code I used does not change). So pre-2018 and 2018+ years may not be comparable for this variable.
    Version 4 release notes:
    • Adds data for 2018
    Version 3 release notes:
    • Adds data in the following formats: Excel.
    • Changes project name to avoid confusing this data for the ones done by NACJD.
    Version 2 release notes:
    • Adds data for 2017.
    • Adds a "number_of_months_reported" variable which says how many months of the year the agency reported data.
    Property Stolen and Recovered is a Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program data set with information on the number of offenses (crimes included are murder, rape, robbery, burglary, theft/larceny, and motor vehicle theft), the value of the offense, and subcategories of the offense (e.g. for robbery it is broken down into subcategories including highway robbery, bank robbery, gas station robbery).

    The majority of the data relates to theft. Theft is divided into subcategories of theft such as shoplifting, theft of bicycle, theft from building, and purse snatching. For a number of items stolen (e.g. money, jewelry and previous metals, guns), the value of property stolen and and the value for property recovered is provided. This data set is also referred to as the Supplement to Return A (Offenses Known and Reported).

    All the data was received directly from the FBI as text or .DTA files.

    There may be inaccuracies in the data, particularly in the group of columns starting with "auto." To reduce (but certainly not eliminate) data errors, I replaced the following values with NA for the group of columns beginning with "offenses" or "auto" as they are common data entry error values (e.g. are larger than the agency's population, are much larger than other crimes or months in same agency): 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000, 5000, 6000, 7000, 8000, 9000, 10000, 20000, 30000, 40000, 50000, 60000, 70000, 80000, 90000, 100000, 99942. This cleaning was NOT done on the columns starting with "value."

    For every numeric column I replaced negative indicator values (e.g. "j" for -1) with the negative number they are supposed to be. These negative number indicators are not included in the FBI's codebook for this data but are present in the data. I used the values in the FBI's codebook for the Offenses Known and Clearances by Arrest data.

    To make it easier to merge with other data, I merged this data with the Law Enforcement Agency Identifiers Crosswalk (LEAIC) data. The data from the LEAIC add FIPS (state, county, and place) and agency type/subtype. If an agency has used a different FIPS code in the past, check to make sure the FIPS code is the same as in this data.

  6. Data from: Impact of Sentencing Guidelines on the Use of Incarceration in...

    • catalog.data.gov
    • icpsr.umich.edu
    Updated Mar 12, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Bureau of Justice Statistics (2025). Impact of Sentencing Guidelines on the Use of Incarceration in Federal Criminal Courts in the United States, 1984-1990 [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/impact-of-sentencing-guidelines-on-the-use-of-incarceration-in-federal-criminal-court-1984-bfac5
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 12, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Bureau of Justice Statisticshttp://bjs.ojp.gov/
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    The primary purpose of this data collection was to examine the impact of the implementation of sentencing guidelines on the rate of incarcerative and nonincarcerative sentences imposed and on the average length of expected time to be served in incarceration for all offenses as well as for select groups of offenses. The measure of sentence length, "expected time to be served," was used to allow for assumed good time and parole reductions. This term represents the amount of time an offender can expect to spend in prison at the time of sentencing, a roughly equivalent standard that can be measured before and after the implementation of federal criminal sentencing guidelines in 1987. Three broad offense categories were studied: drug offenses, robbery, and economic crimes. Drug offenses include a wide range of illegal activities involving marijuana, heroin, and cocaine. Robbery includes bank and postal robbery (both armed and unarmed) as well as other types of robbery offenses that appear less frequently in the federal system, such as carrying a firearm during the commission of a robbery. Economic offenses include fraud (bank, postal, and other), embezzlement (bank, postal, and other), and tax evasion. Other monthly data are provided on the number of prison and probation sentences for all offenses and by offense categories.

  7. o

    Jacob Kaplan's Concatenated Files: Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program...

    • openicpsr.org
    Updated Aug 14, 2018
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Jacob Kaplan (2018). Jacob Kaplan's Concatenated Files: Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program Data: Property Stolen and Recovered (Supplement to Return A) 1960-2020 [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.3886/E105403V8
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Aug 14, 2018
    Dataset provided by
    Princeton University
    Authors
    Jacob Kaplan
    Time period covered
    1960 - 2020
    Description

    For a comprehensive guide to this data and other UCR data, please see my book at ucrbook.comVersion 8 release notes:Adds 2020 data. Please note that the FBI has retired UCR data ending in 2020 data so this will be the last Property Stolen and Recovered data they release. Changes .rda file to .rds.Version 7 release notes:Adds data for 2006.Version 6 release notesChanges release notes description, does not change data.Version 5 release notes:Adds data for 2019Note that the number of months reported variable sharply changes starting in 2018. This is probably due to changes in UCR reporting of the "status" variable which is used to generate the months missing county (the code I used does not change). So pre-2018 and 2018+ years may not be comparable for this variable. Version 4 release notes:Adds data for 2018Version 3 release notes:Adds data in the following formats: Excel.Changes project name to avoid confusing this data for the ones done by NACJD.Version 2 release notes:Adds data for 2017.Adds a "number_of_months_reported" variable which says how many months of the year the agency reported data.Property Stolen and Recovered is a Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program data set with information on the number of offenses (crimes included are murder, rape, robbery, burglary, theft/larceny, and motor vehicle theft), the value of the offense, and subcategories of the offense (e.g. for robbery it is broken down into subcategories including highway robbery, bank robbery, gas station robbery). The majority of the data relates to theft. Theft is divided into subcategories of theft such as shoplifting, theft of bicycle, theft from building, and purse snatching. For a number of items stolen (e.g. money, jewelry and previous metals, guns), the value of property stolen and and the value for property recovered is provided. This data set is also referred to as the Supplement to Return A (Offenses Known and Reported). All the data was received directly from the FBI as text or .DTA files. There may be inaccuracies in the data, particularly in the group of columns starting with "auto." To reduce (but certainly not eliminate) data errors, I replaced the following values with NA for the group of columns beginning with "offenses" or "auto" as they are common data entry error values (e.g. are larger than the agency's population, are much larger than other crimes or months in same agency): 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000, 5000, 6000, 7000, 8000, 9000, 10000, 20000, 30000, 40000, 50000, 60000, 70000, 80000, 90000, 100000, 99942. This cleaning was NOT done on the columns starting with "value."For every numeric column I replaced negative indicator values (e.g. "j" for -1) with the negative number they are supposed to be. These negative number indicators are not included in the FBI's codebook for this data but are present in the data. I used the values in the FBI's codebook for the Offenses Known and Clearances by Arrest data.To make it easier to merge with other data, I merged this data with the Law Enforcement Agency Identifiers Crosswalk (LEAIC) data. The data from the LEAIC add FIPS (state, county, and place) and agency type/subtype. If an agency has used a different FIPS code in the past, check to make sure the FIPS code is the same as in this data.

  8. Philippines PH: Firms Experiencing Losses Due To Theft and Vandalism: % of...

    • ceicdata.com
    Updated Mar 15, 2018
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    CEICdata.com (2018). Philippines PH: Firms Experiencing Losses Due To Theft and Vandalism: % of Firms [Dataset]. https://www.ceicdata.com/en/philippines/company-statistics/ph-firms-experiencing-losses-due-to-theft-and-vandalism--of-firms
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 15, 2018
    Dataset provided by
    CEIC Data
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Time period covered
    Dec 1, 2009 - Dec 1, 2015
    Area covered
    Philippines
    Variables measured
    Enterprises Statistics
    Description

    Philippines PH: Firms Experiencing Losses Due To Theft and Vandalism: % of Firms data was reported at 17.000 % in 2015. This records a decrease from the previous number of 29.200 % for 2009. Philippines PH: Firms Experiencing Losses Due To Theft and Vandalism: % of Firms data is updated yearly, averaging 23.100 % from Dec 2009 (Median) to 2015, with 2 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 29.200 % in 2009 and a record low of 17.000 % in 2015. Philippines PH: Firms Experiencing Losses Due To Theft and Vandalism: % of Firms data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Philippines – Table PH.World Bank.WDI: Company Statistics. Percent of firms experiencing losses due to theft, robbery, vandalism or arson that occurred on the establishment's premises.; ; World Bank, Enterprise Surveys (http://www.enterprisesurveys.org/).; Unweighted average;

  9. Not seeing a result you expected?
    Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Camp, George M.; Gould, LeRoy (1992). Influence of Sanctions and Opportunities on Rates of Bank Robbery, 1970-1975: [United States] [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08260.v1
Organization logo

Data from: Influence of Sanctions and Opportunities on Rates of Bank Robbery, 1970-1975: [United States]

Related Article
Explore at:
asciiAvailable download formats
Dataset updated
Feb 16, 1992
Dataset provided by
Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Researchhttps://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/pages/
Authors
Camp, George M.; Gould, LeRoy
License

https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/studies/8260/termshttps://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/studies/8260/terms

Time period covered
1970 - 1975
Area covered
United States
Description

This study was designed to explain variations in crime rates and to examine the deterrent effects of sanctions on crime. The study concentrated on bank robberies, but it also examined burglaries and other kinds of robberies. In examining these effects the study condidered three sets of factors: (1) Economic considerations-- the cost/benefit factors that individuals consider in deciding whether or not to perform a crime, (2) Degree of anomie--the amount of alienation and isolation individuals feel toward society and the effect of these feelings on the individuals' performing a crime, and (3) Opportunity--the effect of exposure, attractiveness, and degree of guardianship on an object being taken. These factors were explored by gathering information on such topics as: crime clearance rates, arrests, and sentences, bank attributes, and socioeconomic and demographic information.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu