4 datasets found
  1. f

    Comparison of user, site, and network-centric approaches to web analytics...

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated May 31, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Bernard J. Jansen; Soon-gyo Jung; Joni Salminen (2023). Comparison of user, site, and network-centric approaches to web analytics data collection showing advantages, disadvantages, and examples of each approach at the time of the study. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268212.t001
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 31, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Bernard J. Jansen; Soon-gyo Jung; Joni Salminen
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Comparison of user, site, and network-centric approaches to web analytics data collection showing advantages, disadvantages, and examples of each approach at the time of the study.

  2. C

    Competitive Analysis of Industry Rivals Report

    • datainsightsmarket.com
    doc, pdf, ppt
    Updated May 20, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Data Insights Market (2025). Competitive Analysis of Industry Rivals Report [Dataset]. https://www.datainsightsmarket.com/reports/competitive-analysis-of-industry-rivals-1427015
    Explore at:
    pdf, doc, pptAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 20, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Data Insights Market
    License

    https://www.datainsightsmarket.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.datainsightsmarket.com/privacy-policy

    Time period covered
    2025 - 2033
    Area covered
    Global
    Variables measured
    Market Size
    Description

    The website analytics market, encompassing solutions like product, traffic, and sales analytics, is a dynamic and rapidly growing sector. While precise market sizing data wasn't provided, considering the presence of major players like Google, SEMrush, and SimilarWeb, along with numerous smaller competitors catering to SMEs and large enterprises, we can reasonably estimate a 2025 market value of $15 billion, projecting a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 15% from 2025-2033. This growth is fueled by the increasing reliance of businesses on data-driven decision-making, the expanding adoption of digital marketing strategies, and the rising need for precise performance measurement across all digital channels. Key trends driving this expansion include the integration of AI and machine learning for enhanced predictive analytics, the rise of serverless architectures for cost-effective scalability, and the growing demand for comprehensive dashboards providing unified insights across different marketing channels. However, challenges remain, including data privacy concerns, the complexity of integrating various analytics tools, and the need for businesses to cultivate internal expertise to effectively utilize the data generated. The competitive landscape is highly fragmented, with established giants like Google Analytics competing alongside specialized providers like SEMrush (focused on SEO and PPC analytics), SimilarWeb (website traffic analysis), and BuiltWith (technology identification). Smaller companies, such as Owletter and SpyFu, carve out niches by focusing on specific areas or offering specialized features. This dynamic competition necessitates continuous innovation and adaptation. Companies must differentiate themselves through specialized features, ease of use, and strong customer support. The market's geographic distribution is likely skewed towards North America and Europe initially, mirroring the higher digital maturity in these regions; however, rapid growth is anticipated in Asia-Pacific regions driven by increasing internet penetration and adoption of digital technologies within emerging economies like India and China. Successful players will need to develop strategies to effectively capture this expanding global market, adapting offerings to suit diverse regional needs and regulatory environments.

  3. f

    Brief query descriptions by data source.

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Dec 20, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Stephanie R. Pitts; Sarah Trigger; Dannielle E. Kelley (2024). Brief query descriptions by data source. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0311723.t002
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Dec 20, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Stephanie R. Pitts; Sarah Trigger; Dannielle E. Kelley
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Puff Bar, a disposable electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS), was the ENDS brand most commonly used by U.S. youth in 2021. We explored whether Puff Bar’s rise in marketplace prominence was detectable through advertising, retail sales, social media, and web traffic data sources. We retrospectively documented potential signals of interest in and uptake of Puff Bar in the United States using metrics based on advertising (Numerator and Comperemedia), retail sales (NielsenIQ), social media (Twitter, via Sprinklr), and web traffic (Similarweb) data from January 2019 to June 2022. We selected metrics based on (1) data availability, (2) potential to graph metric longitudinally, and (3) variability in metric. We graphed metrics and assessed data patterns compared to data for Vuse, a comparator product, and in the context of regulatory events significant to Puff Bar. The number of Twitter posts that contained a Puff Bar term (social media), Puff Bar product sales measured in dollars (sales), and the number of visits to the Puff Bar website (web traffic) exhibited potential for surveilling Puff Bar due to ease of calculation, comprehensibility, and responsiveness to events. Advertising tracked through Numerator and Comperemedia did not appear to capture marketing from Puff Bar’s manufacturer or drive change in marketplace prominence. This study demonstrates how quantitative changes in metrics developed using advertising, retail sales, social media, and web traffic data sources detected changes in Puff Bar’s marketplace prominence. We conclude that low-effort, scalable, rapid signal detection capabilities can be an important part of a multi-component tobacco surveillance program.

  4. C

    Competitive Intelligence Tools Software Report

    • marketresearchforecast.com
    doc, pdf, ppt
    Updated Mar 2, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Market Research Forecast (2025). Competitive Intelligence Tools Software Report [Dataset]. https://www.marketresearchforecast.com/reports/competitive-intelligence-tools-software-26901
    Explore at:
    doc, pdf, pptAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Mar 2, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Market Research Forecast
    License

    https://www.marketresearchforecast.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.marketresearchforecast.com/privacy-policy

    Time period covered
    2025 - 2033
    Area covered
    Global
    Variables measured
    Market Size
    Description

    The Competitive Intelligence (CI) Tools Software market, valued at $1409.4 million in 2025, is experiencing robust growth. While a precise Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) isn't provided, considering the rapid digital transformation across industries and the increasing need for data-driven decision-making, a conservative estimate of 15% CAGR for the forecast period (2025-2033) is reasonable. This growth is fueled by several key drivers: the rising adoption of cloud-based solutions offering scalability and accessibility, the expanding use of CI tools by both large enterprises and SMEs to gain a competitive edge, and the increasing complexity of market dynamics requiring sophisticated analytical capabilities. Trends indicate a shift towards AI-powered CI platforms that provide automated insights and predictive analytics, enhancing efficiency and accuracy. However, challenges such as the high cost of advanced CI solutions, the need for skilled professionals to interpret data effectively, and data privacy concerns act as market restraints. Segmentation reveals a significant preference for cloud-based deployments due to their flexibility and cost-effectiveness, while large enterprises constitute the major revenue segment due to their higher budgets and complex analytical needs. This segment is expected to grow at a slightly faster rate than the SME segment over the forecast period. The competitive landscape is characterized by a mix of established players and emerging startups. Companies like Crayon, Brandwatch, and SimilarWeb hold significant market share, leveraging their extensive data networks and established customer bases. However, the market also witnesses the entry of numerous agile startups offering innovative features and competitive pricing. Geographical distribution shows North America and Europe currently dominate the market, owing to higher technology adoption and a well-established business ecosystem. However, the Asia-Pacific region is projected to experience the fastest growth due to increasing digitalization and expanding business operations in emerging economies like India and China. The continued focus on innovation, particularly in AI and machine learning integration, will further shape the market's evolution over the next decade, opening opportunities for both established players and new entrants to capture market share.

  5. Not seeing a result you expected?
    Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Bernard J. Jansen; Soon-gyo Jung; Joni Salminen (2023). Comparison of user, site, and network-centric approaches to web analytics data collection showing advantages, disadvantages, and examples of each approach at the time of the study. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268212.t001

Comparison of user, site, and network-centric approaches to web analytics data collection showing advantages, disadvantages, and examples of each approach at the time of the study.

Related Article
Explore at:
2 scholarly articles cite this dataset (View in Google Scholar)
xlsAvailable download formats
Dataset updated
May 31, 2023
Dataset provided by
PLOS ONE
Authors
Bernard J. Jansen; Soon-gyo Jung; Joni Salminen
License

Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically

Description

Comparison of user, site, and network-centric approaches to web analytics data collection showing advantages, disadvantages, and examples of each approach at the time of the study.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu