Raw data outputs 1-18 Raw data output 1. Differentially expressed genes in AML CSCs compared with GTCs as well as in TCGA AML cancer samples compared with normal ones. This data was generated based on the results of AML microarray and TCGA data analysis. Raw data output 2. Commonly and uniquely differentially expressed genes in AML CSC/GTC microarray and TCGA bulk RNA-seq datasets. This data was generated based on the results of AML microarray and TCGA data analysis. Raw data output 3. Common differentially expressed genes between training and test set samples the microarray dataset. This data was generated based on the results of AML microarray data analysis. Raw data output 4. Detailed information on the samples of the breast cancer microarray dataset (GSE52327) used in this study. Raw data output 5. Differentially expressed genes in breast CSCs compared with GTCs as well as in TCGA BRCA cancer samples compared with normal ones. Raw data output 6. Commonly and uniquely differentially expressed genes in breast cancer CSC/GTC microarray and TCGA BRCA bulk RNA-seq datasets. This data was generated based on the results of breast cancer microarray and TCGA BRCA data analysis. CSC, and GTC are abbreviations of cancer stem cell, and general tumor cell, respectively. Raw data output 7. Differential and common co-expression and protein-protein interaction of genes between CSC and GTC samples. This data was generated based on the results of AML microarray and STRING database-based protein-protein interaction data analysis. CSC, and GTC are abbreviations of cancer stem cell, and general tumor cell, respectively. Raw data output 8. Differentially expressed genes between AML dormant and active CSCs. This data was generated based on the results of AML scRNA-seq data analysis. Raw data output 9. Uniquely expressed genes in dormant or active AML CSCs. This data was generated based on the results of AML scRNA-seq data analysis. Raw data output 10. Intersections between the targeting transcription factors of AML key CSC genes and differentially expressed genes between AML CSCs vs GTCs and between dormant and active AML CSCs or the uniquely expressed genes in either class of CSCs. Raw data output 11. Targeting desirableness score of AML key CSC genes and their targeting transcription factors. These scores were generated based on an in-house scoring function described in the Methods section. Raw data output 12. CSC-specific targeting desirableness score of AML key CSC genes and their targeting transcription factors. These scores were generated based on an in-house scoring function described in the Methods section. Raw data output 13. The protein-protein interactions between AML key CSC genes with themselves and their targeting transcription factors. This data was generated based on the results of AML microarray and STRING database-based protein-protein interaction data analysis. Raw data output 14. The previously confirmed associations of genes having the highest targeting desirableness and CSC-specific targeting desirableness scores with AML or other cancers’ (stem) cells as well as hematopoietic stem cells. These data were generated based on a PubMed database-based literature mining. Raw data output 15. Drug score of available drugs and bioactive small molecules targeting AML key CSC genes and/or their targeting transcription factors. These scores were generated based on an in-house scoring function described in the Methods section. Raw data output 16. CSC-specific drug score of available drugs and bioactive small molecules targeting AML key CSC genes and/or their targeting transcription factors. These scores were generated based on an in-house scoring function described in the Methods section. Raw data output 17. Candidate drugs for experimental validation. These drugs were selected based on their respective (CSC-specific) drug scores. CSC is the abbreviation of cancer stem cell. Raw data output 18. Detailed information on the samples of the AML microarray dataset GSE30375 used in this study.

About this dataset

Context

The dataset tabulates the Excel population distribution across 18 age groups. It lists the population in each age group along with the percentage population relative of the total population for Excel. The dataset can be utilized to understand the population distribution of Excel by age. For example, using this dataset, we can identify the largest age group in Excel.

Key observations

The largest age group in Excel, AL was for the group of age 45 to 49 years years with a population of 74 (15.64%), according to the ACS 2018-2022 5-Year Estimates. At the same time, the smallest age group in Excel, AL was the 85 years and over years with a population of 2 (0.42%). Source: U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2018-2022 5-Year Estimates

Content

When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2018-2022 5-Year Estimates

Age groups:

• Under 5 years
• 5 to 9 years
• 10 to 14 years
• 15 to 19 years
• 20 to 24 years
• 25 to 29 years
• 30 to 34 years
• 35 to 39 years
• 40 to 44 years
• 45 to 49 years
• 50 to 54 years
• 55 to 59 years
• 60 to 64 years
• 65 to 69 years
• 70 to 74 years
• 75 to 79 years
• 80 to 84 years
• 85 years and over

Variables / Data Columns

• Age Group: This column displays the age group in consideration
• Population: The population for the specific age group in the Excel is shown in this column.
• % of Total Population: This column displays the population of each age group as a proportion of Excel total population. Please note that the sum of all percentages may not equal one due to rounding of values.

Good to know

Margin of Error

Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.

Custom data

If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.

Inspiration

Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.

Recommended for further research

This dataset is a part of the main dataset for Excel Population by Age. You can refer the same here

Excel spreadsheets by species (4 letter code is abbreviation for genus and species used in study, year 2010 or 2011 is year data collected, SH indicates data for Science Hub, date is date of file preparation). The data in a file are described in a read me file which is the first worksheet in each file. Each row in a species spreadsheet is for one plot (plant). The data themselves are in the data worksheet. One file includes a read me description of the column in the date set for chemical analysis. In this file one row is an herbicide treatment and sample for chemical analysis (if taken). This dataset is associated with the following publication: Olszyk , D., T. Pfleeger, T. Shiroyama, M. Blakely-Smith, E. Lee , and M. Plocher. Plant reproduction is altered by simulated herbicide drift toconstructed plant communities. ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY. Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Pensacola, FL, USA, 36(10): 2799-2813, (2017).

About this dataset

Context

The dataset tabulates the Excel population by age. The dataset can be utilized to understand the age distribution and demographics of Excel.

Content

The dataset constitues the following three datasets

• Excel, AL Age Group Population Dataset: A complete breakdown of Excel age demographics from 0 to 85 years, distributed across 18 age groups
• Excel, AL Age Cohorts Dataset: Children, Working Adults, and Seniors in Excel - Population and Percentage Analysis
• Excel, AL Population Pyramid Dataset: Age Groups, Male and Female Population, and Total Population for Demographics Analysis

Good to know

Margin of Error

Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.

Custom data

If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.

Inspiration

Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.

About this dataset

Context

The dataset tabulates the Excel population over the last 20 plus years. It lists the population for each year, along with the year on year change in population, as well as the change in percentage terms for each year. The dataset can be utilized to understand the population change of Excel across the last two decades. For example, using this dataset, we can identify if the population is declining or increasing. If there is a change, when the population peaked, or if it is still growing and has not reached its peak. We can also compare the trend with the overall trend of United States population over the same period of time.

Key observations

In 2023, the population of Excel was 531, a 1.30% decrease year-by-year from 2022. Previously, in 2022, Excel population was 538, a decline of 1.47% compared to a population of 546 in 2021. Over the last 20 plus years, between 2000 and 2023, population of Excel decreased by 44. In this period, the peak population was 713 in the year 2010. The numbers suggest that the population has already reached its peak and is showing a trend of decline. Source: U.S. Census Bureau Population Estimates Program (PEP).

Content

When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau Population Estimates Program (PEP).

Data Coverage:

• From 2000 to 2023

Variables / Data Columns

• Year: This column displays the data year (Measured annually and for years 2000 to 2023)
• Population: The population for the specific year for the Excel is shown in this column.
• Year on Year Change: This column displays the change in Excel population for each year compared to the previous year.
• Change in Percent: This column displays the year on year change as a percentage. Please note that the sum of all percentages may not equal one due to rounding of values.

Good to know

Margin of Error

Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.

Custom data

If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.

Inspiration

Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.

Recommended for further research

This dataset is a part of the main dataset for Excel Population by Year. You can refer the same here

This dataset contains FEMA applicant-level data for the Individuals and Households Program (IHP). All PII information has been removed. The _location is represented by county, city, and zip code. This dataset contains Individual Assistance (IA) applications from DR1439 (declared in 2002) to those declared over 30 days ago. The full data set is refreshed on an annual basis and refreshed weekly to update disasters declared in the last 18 months. This dataset includes all major disasters and includes only valid registrants (applied in a declared county, within the registration period, having damage due to the incident and damage within the incident period). Information about individual data elements and descriptions are listed in the metadata information within the dataset.rnValid registrants may be eligible for IA assistance, which is intended to meet basic needs and supplement disaster recovery efforts. IA assistance is not intended to return disaster-damaged property to its pre-disaster condition. Disaster damage to secondary or vacation homes does not qualify for IHP assistance.rnData comes from FEMA's National Emergency Management Information System (NEMIS) with raw, unedited, self-reported content and subject to a small percentage of human error.rnAny financial information is derived from NEMIS and not FEMA's official financial systems. Due to differences in reporting periods, status of obligations and application of business rules, this financial information may differ slightly from official publication on public websites such as usaspending.gov. This dataset is not intended to be used for any official federal reporting. rnCitation: The Agency’s preferred citation for datasets (API usage or file downloads) can be found on the OpenFEMA Terms and Conditions page, Citing Data section: https://www.fema.gov/about/openfema/terms-conditions.rnDue to the size of this file, tools other than a spreadsheet may be required to analyze, visualize, and manipulate the data. MS Excel will not be able to process files this large without data loss. It is recommended that a database (e.g., MS Access, MySQL, PostgreSQL, etc.) be used to store and manipulate data. Other programming tools such as R, Apache Spark, and Python can also be used to analyze and visualize data. Further, basic Linux/Unix tools can be used to manipulate, search, and modify large files.rnIf you have media inquiries about this dataset, please email the FEMA News Desk at FEMA-News-Desk@fema.dhs.gov or call (202) 646-3272. For inquiries about FEMA's data and Open Government program, please email the OpenFEMA team at OpenFEMA@fema.dhs.gov.rnThis dataset is scheduled to be superceded by Valid Registrations Version 2 by early CY 2024.

According to Cognitive Market Research, the global Graph Analytics market size will be USD 2522 million in 2024 and will expand at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 34.0% from 2024 to 2031. Market Dynamics of Graph Analytics Market

Key Drivers for Graph Analytics Market

Increasing Recognition of the Advantages of Graph Databases- One of the main reasons for the Graph Analytics market is the increasing recognition of the advantages of graph databases. Unlike traditional relational databases, graph databases excel at handling complex relationships and interconnected data, making them ideal for use cases such as fraud detection, recommendation engines, and social network analysis. Businesses are leveraging these capabilities to uncover insights and patterns that were previously difficult to detect. The rise of big data and the need for real-time analytics are further driving the adoption of graph databases, as they offer enhanced performance and scalability for large-scale data sets. Additionally, advancements in artificial intelligence and machine learning are amplifying the value of graph databases, enabling more sophisticated data modeling and predictive analytics.
Growing Uptake of Big Data Tools to Drive the Graph Analytics Market's Expansion in the Years Ahead.

Key Restraints for Graph Analytics Market

Limited Awareness and Understanding pose a serious threat to the Graph Analytics industry.
The market also faces significant difficulties related to data security and privacy.

Introduction of the Graph Analytics Market

The Graph Analytics Market is rapidly expanding, driven by the growing need for advanced data analysis techniques in various sectors. Graph analytics leverages graph structures to represent and analyze relationships and dependencies, providing deeper insights than traditional data analysis methods. Key factors propelling this market include the rise of big data, the increasing adoption of artificial intelligence and machine learning, and the demand for real-time data processing. Industries such as finance, healthcare, telecommunications, and retail are major contributors, utilizing graph analytics for fraud detection, personalized recommendations, network optimization, and more. Leading vendors are continually innovating to offer scalable, efficient solutions, incorporating advanced features like graph databases and visualization tools.

About this dataset

Context

The dataset tabulates the population of Excel by gender, including both male and female populations. This dataset can be utilized to understand the population distribution of Excel across both sexes and to determine which sex constitutes the majority.

Key observations

There is a slight majority of male population, with 51.59% of total population being male. Source: U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2018-2022 5-Year Estimates.

Content

When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2018-2022 5-Year Estimates.

Scope of gender :

Please note that American Community Survey asks a question about the respondents current sex, but not about gender, sexual orientation, or sex at birth. The question is intended to capture data for biological sex, not gender. Respondents are supposed to respond with the answer as either of Male or Female. Our research and this dataset mirrors the data reported as Male and Female for gender distribution analysis. No further analysis is done on the data reported from the Census Bureau.

Variables / Data Columns

• Gender: This column displays the Gender (Male / Female)
• Population: The population of the gender in the Excel is shown in this column.
• % of Total Population: This column displays the percentage distribution of each gender as a proportion of Excel total population. Please note that the sum of all percentages may not equal one due to rounding of values.

Good to know

Margin of Error

Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.

Custom data

If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.

Inspiration

Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.

Recommended for further research

This dataset is a part of the main dataset for Excel Population by Race & Ethnicity. You can refer the same here

About this dataset

Context

The dataset presents the the household distribution across 16 income brackets among four distinct age groups in Excel: Under 25 years, 25-44 years, 45-64 years, and over 65 years. The dataset highlights the variation in household income, offering valuable insights into economic trends and disparities within different age categories, aiding in data analysis and decision-making..

Key observations

• Upon closer examination of the distribution of households among age brackets, it reveals that there are 6(3.53%) households where the householder is under 25 years old, 59(34.71%) households with a householder aged between 25 and 44 years, 52(30.59%) households with a householder aged between 45 and 64 years, and 53(31.18%) households where the householder is over 65 years old.
• In Excel, the age group of 25 to 44 years stands out with both the highest median income and the maximum share of households. This alignment suggests a financially stable demographic, indicating an established community with stable careers and higher incomes.

Content

When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2019-2023 5-Year Estimates.

Income brackets:

• Less than $10,000
• $10,000 to $14,999
• $15,000 to $19,999
• $20,000 to $24,999
• $25,000 to $29,999
• $30,000 to $34,999
• $35,000 to $39,999
• $40,000 to $44,999
• $45,000 to $49,999
• $50,000 to $59,999
• $60,000 to $74,999
• $75,000 to $99,999
• $100,000 to $124,999
• $125,000 to $149,999
• $150,000 to $199,999
• $200,000 or more

Variables / Data Columns

• Household Income: This column showcases 16 income brackets ranging from Under $10,000 to $200,000+ ( As mentioned above).
• Under 25 years: The count of households led by a head of household under 25 years old with income within a specified income bracket.
• 25 to 44 years: The count of households led by a head of household 25 to 44 years old with income within a specified income bracket.
• 45 to 64 years: The count of households led by a head of household 45 to 64 years old with income within a specified income bracket.
• 65 years and over: The count of households led by a head of household 65 years and over old with income within a specified income bracket.

Good to know

Margin of Error

Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.

Custom data

If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.

Inspiration

Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.

Recommended for further research

This dataset is a part of the main dataset for Excel median household income by age. You can refer the same here

MealMe provides comprehensive grocery and retail SKU-level product data, including real-time pricing, from the top 100 retailers in the USA and Canada. Our proprietary technology ensures accurate and up-to-date insights, empowering businesses to excel in competitive intelligence, pricing strategies, and market analysis.

Retailers Covered: MealMe’s database includes detailed SKU-level data and pricing from leading grocery and retail chains such as Walmart, Target, Costco, Kroger, Safeway, Publix, Whole Foods, Aldi, ShopRite, BJ’s Wholesale Club, Sprouts Farmers Market, Albertsons, Ralphs, Pavilions, Gelson’s, Vons, Shaw’s, Metro, and many more. Our coverage spans the most influential retailers across North America, ensuring businesses have the insights needed to stay competitive in dynamic markets.

Key Features: SKU-Level Granularity: Access detailed product-level data, including product descriptions, categories, brands, and variations. Real-Time Pricing: Monitor current pricing trends across major retailers for comprehensive market comparisons. Regional Insights: Analyze geographic price variations and inventory availability to identify trends and opportunities. Customizable Solutions: Tailored data delivery options to meet the specific needs of your business or industry. Use Cases: Competitive Intelligence: Gain visibility into pricing, product availability, and assortment strategies of top retailers like Walmart, Costco, and Target. Pricing Optimization: Use real-time data to create dynamic pricing models that respond to market conditions. Market Research: Identify trends, gaps, and consumer preferences by analyzing SKU-level data across leading retailers. Inventory Management: Streamline operations with accurate, real-time inventory availability. Retail Execution: Ensure on-shelf product availability and compliance with merchandising strategies. Industries Benefiting from Our Data CPG (Consumer Packaged Goods): Optimize product positioning, pricing, and distribution strategies. E-commerce Platforms: Enhance online catalogs with precise pricing and inventory information. Market Research Firms: Conduct detailed analyses to uncover industry trends and opportunities. Retailers: Benchmark against competitors like Kroger and Aldi to refine assortments and pricing. AI & Analytics Companies: Fuel predictive models and business intelligence with reliable SKU-level data. Data Delivery and Integration MealMe offers flexible integration options, including APIs and custom data exports, for seamless access to real-time data. Whether you need large-scale analysis or continuous updates, our solutions scale with your business needs.

Why Choose MealMe? Comprehensive Coverage: Data from the top 100 grocery and retail chains in North America, including Walmart, Target, and Costco. Real-Time Accuracy: Up-to-date pricing and product information ensures competitive edge. Customizable Insights: Tailored datasets align with your specific business objectives. Proven Expertise: Trusted by diverse industries for delivering actionable insights. MealMe empowers businesses to unlock their full potential with real-time, high-quality grocery and retail data. For more information or to schedule a demo, contact us today!

About this dataset

Context

The dataset presents the detailed breakdown of the count of individuals within distinct income brackets, categorizing them by gender (men and women) and employment type - full-time (FT) and part-time (PT), offering valuable insights into the diverse income landscapes within Excel. The dataset can be utilized to gain insights into gender-based income distribution within the Excel population, aiding in data analysis and decision-making..

Key observations

• Employment patterns: Within Excel, among individuals aged 15 years and older with income, there were 154 men and 106 women in the workforce. Among them, 106 men were engaged in full-time, year-round employment, while 51 women were in full-time, year-round roles.
• Annual income under $24,999: Of the male population working full-time, 0.94% fell within the income range of under $24,999, while 23.53% of the female population working full-time was represented in the same income bracket.
• Annual income above $100,000: 15.09% of men in full-time roles earned incomes exceeding $100,000, while 11.76% of women in full-time positions earned within this income bracket.
• Refer to the research insights for more key observations on more income brackets ( Annual income under $24,999, Annual income between $25,000 and $49,999, Annual income between $50,000 and $74,999, Annual income between $75,000 and $99,999 and Annual income above $100,000) and employment types (full-time year-round and part-time)

Content

When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2019-2023 5-Year Estimates.

Income brackets:

• $1 to $2,499 or loss
• $2,500 to $4,999
• $5,000 to $7,499
• $7,500 to $9,999
• $10,000 to $12,499
• $12,500 to $14,999
• $15,000 to $17,499
• $17,500 to $19,999
• $20,000 to $22,499
• $22,500 to $24,999
• $25,000 to $29,999
• $30,000 to $34,999
• $35,000 to $39,999
• $40,000 to $44,999
• $45,000 to $49,999
• $50,000 to $54,999
• $55,000 to $64,999
• $65,000 to $74,999
• $75,000 to $99,999
• $100,000 or more

Variables / Data Columns

• Income Bracket: This column showcases 20 income brackets ranging from $1 to $100,000+..
• Full-Time Males: The count of males employed full-time year-round and earning within a specified income bracket
• Part-Time Males: The count of males employed part-time and earning within a specified income bracket
• Full-Time Females: The count of females employed full-time year-round and earning within a specified income bracket
• Part-Time Females: The count of females employed part-time and earning within a specified income bracket

Employment type classifications include:

• Full-time, year-round: A full-time, year-round worker is a person who worked full time (35 or more hours per week) and 50 or more weeks during the previous calendar year.
• Part-time: A part-time worker is a person who worked less than 35 hours per week during the previous calendar year.

Good to know

Margin of Error

Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.

Custom data

If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.

Inspiration

Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.

Recommended for further research

This dataset is a part of the main dataset for Excel median household income by race. You can refer the same here

Context

The Google Merchandise Store sells Google branded merchandise. The data is typical of what you would see for an ecommerce website.

Content

The sample dataset contains Google Analytics 360 data from the Google Merchandise Store, a real ecommerce store. The Google Merchandise Store sells Google branded merchandise. The data is typical of what you would see for an ecommerce website. It includes the following kinds of information:

Traffic source data: information about where website visitors originate. This includes data about organic traffic, paid search traffic, display traffic, etc. Content data: information about the behavior of users on the site. This includes the URLs of pages that visitors look at, how they interact with content, etc. Transactional data: information about the transactions that occur on the Google Merchandise Store website.

Fork this kernel to get started.

Acknowledgements

Data from: https://bigquery.cloud.google.com/table/bigquery-public-data:google_analytics_sample.ga_sessions_20170801

Banner Photo by Edho Pratama from Unsplash.

Inspiration

What is the total number of transactions generated per device browser in July 2017?

The real bounce rate is defined as the percentage of visits with a single pageview. What was the real bounce rate per traffic source?

What was the average number of product pageviews for users who made a purchase in July 2017?

What was the average number of product pageviews for users who did not make a purchase in July 2017?

What was the average total transactions per user that made a purchase in July 2017?

What is the average amount of money spent per session in July 2017?

What is the sequence of pages viewed?

About this dataset

Context

The dataset tabulates the Excel household income by age. The dataset can be utilized to understand the age-based income distribution of Excel income.

Content

The dataset will have the following datasets when applicable

Please note: The 2020 1-Year ACS estimates data was not reported by the Census Bureau due to the impact on survey collection and analysis caused by COVID-19. Consequently, median household income data for 2020 is unavailable for large cities (population 65,000 and above).

• Excel, AL annual median income by age groups dataset (in 2022 inflation-adjusted dollars)
• Age-wise distribution of Excel, AL household incomes: Comparative analysis across 16 income brackets

Good to know

Margin of Error

Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.

Custom data

If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.

Inspiration

Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.

Interested in deeper insights and visual analysis?

Explore our comprehensive data analysis and visual representations for a deeper understanding of Excel income distribution by age. You can refer the same here

We describe a bibliometric network characterizing co-authorship collaborations in the entire Italian academic community. The network, consisting of 38,220 nodes and 507,050 edges, is built upon two distinct data sources: faculty information provided by the Italian Ministry of University and Research and publications available in Semantic Scholar. Both nodes and edges are associated with a large variety of semantic data, including gender, bibliometric indexes, authors' and publications' research fields, and temporal information. While linking data between the two original sources posed many challenges, the network has been carefully validated to assess its reliability and to understand its graph-theoretic characteristics. By resembling several features of social networks, our dataset can be profitably leveraged in experimental studies in the wide social network analytics domain as well as in more specific bibliometric contexts. , The proposed network is built starting from two distinct data sources:

the entire dataset dump from Semantic Scholar (with particular emphasis on the authors and papers datasets) the entire list of Italian faculty members as maintained by Cineca (under appointment by the Italian Ministry of University and Research).

By means of a custom name-identity recognition algorithm (details are available in the accompanying paper published in Scientific Data), the names of the authors in the Semantic Scholar dataset have been mapped against the names contained in the Cineca dataset and authors with no match (e.g., because of not being part of an Italian university) have been discarded. The remaining authors will compose the nodes of the network, which have been enriched with node-related (i.e., author-related) attributes. In order to build the network edges, we leveraged the papers dataset from Semantic Scholar: specifically, any two authors are said to be connected if there is at least one pap..., , # Data cleaning and enrichment through data integration: networking the Italian academia

https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.wpzgmsbwj

Description of the data and file structure

This repository contains two main data files:

• edge_data_AGG.csv, the full network in comma-separated edge list format (this file contains mainly temporal co-authorship information);
• Coauthorship_Network_AGG.graphml, the full network in GraphML format.Â

along with several supplementary data, listed below, useful only to build the network (i.e., for reproducibility only):

• University-City-match.xlsx, an Excel file that maps the name of a university against the city where its respective headquarter is located;
• Areas-SS-CINECA-match.xlsx, an Excel file that maps the research areas in Cineca against the research areas in Semantic Scholar.

Description of the main data files

The Coauthorship_Network_AGG.graphml is intended to be the core file which c...

Abstract copyright UK Data Service and data collection copyright owner.

The heat pump monitoring datasets are a key output of the Electrification of Heat Demonstration (EoH) project, a government-funded heat pump trial assessing the feasibility of heat pumps across the UK’s diverse housing stock. These datasets are provided in both cleansed and raw form and allow analysis of the initial performance of the heat pumps installed in the trial. From the datasets, insights such as heat pump seasonal performance factor (a measure of the heat pump's efficiency), heat pump performance during the coldest day of the year, and half-hourly performance to inform peak demand can be gleaned.

For the second edition (December 2024), the data were updated to include cleaned performance data collected between November 2020 and September 2023. The only documentation currently available with the study is the Excel data dictionary. Reports and other contextual information can be found on the Energy Systems Catapult website.

The EoH project was funded by the Department of Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy. From 2023, it is covered by the new Department for Energy Security and Net Zero.

Data availability

This study comprises the open-access cleansed data from the EoH project and a summary dataset, available in four zipped files (see the 'Access Data' tab). Users must download all four zip files to obtain the full set of cleansed data and accompanying documentation.

When unzipped, the full cleansed data comprises 742 CSV files. Most of the individual CSV files are too large to open in Excel. Users should ensure they have sufficient computing facilities to analyse the data.

The UKDS also holds an accompanying study, SN 9049 Electrification of Heat Demonstration Project: Heat Pump Performance Raw Data, 2020-2023, which is available only to registered UKDS users. This contains the raw data from the EoH project. Since the data are very large, only the summary dataset is available to download; an order must be placed for FTP delivery of the remaining raw data. Other studies in the set include SN 9209, which comprises 30-minute interval heat pump performance data, and SN 9210, which includes daily heat pump performance data.

The Python code used to cleanse the raw data and then perform the analysis is accessible via the Energy Systems Catapult Github

Heat Pump Performance across the BEIS funded heat pump trial, The Electrification of Heat (EoH) Demonstration Project. See the documentation for data contents.

Success.ai’s Ecommerce Store Data for the APAC E-commerce Sector provides a reliable and accurate dataset tailored for businesses aiming to connect with e-commerce professionals and organizations across the Asia-Pacific region. Covering roles and businesses involved in online retail, marketplace management, logistics, and digital commerce, this dataset includes verified business profiles, decision-maker contact details, and actionable insights.

With access to continuously updated, AI-validated data and over 700 million global profiles, Success.ai ensures your outreach, market analysis, and partnership strategies are effective and data-driven. Backed by our Best Price Guarantee, this solution helps you excel in one of the world’s fastest-growing e-commerce markets.

Why Choose Success.ai’s Ecommerce Store Data?

1. Verified Profiles for Precision Engagement

   • Access verified profiles, business locations, employee counts, and decision-maker details for e-commerce businesses across APAC.
   • AI-driven validation ensures 99% accuracy, improving engagement rates and reducing outreach inefficiencies.

2. Comprehensive Coverage of the APAC E-commerce Sector

   • Includes businesses from major e-commerce hubs such as China, India, Japan, South Korea, Australia, and Southeast Asia.
   • Gain insights into regional e-commerce trends, digital transformation efforts, and logistics innovations.

3. Continuously Updated Datasets

   • Real-time updates ensure that business profiles, employee roles, and operational insights remain accurate and relevant.
   • Stay aligned with dynamic market conditions and emerging opportunities in the APAC region.

4. Ethical and Compliant

   • Fully adheres to GDPR, CCPA, and other global data privacy regulations, ensuring responsible and lawful data usage.

Data Highlights:

• 700M+ Verified Global Profiles: Access business profiles for e-commerce professionals and organizations across APAC.
• Firmographic Insights: Gain detailed information, including business locations, employee counts, and operational details.
• Decision-maker Profiles: Connect with key e-commerce leaders, managers, and strategists driving online retail innovation.
• Industry Trends: Understand emerging e-commerce trends, consumer behavior, and market dynamics in the APAC region.

Key Features of the Dataset:

1. Comprehensive E-commerce Business Profiles

   • Identify and connect with businesses specializing in online retail, marketplace management, and digital commerce logistics.
   • Target decision-makers involved in supply chain optimization, digital marketing, and platform development.

2. Advanced Filters for Precision Campaigns

   • Filter businesses and professionals by industry focus (fashion, electronics, grocery), geographic location, or employee size.
   • Tailor campaigns to address specific goals, such as promoting technology adoption, enhancing customer engagement, or expanding supply chains.

3. Regional and Sector-specific Insights

   • Leverage data on APAC’s fast-growing e-commerce markets, consumer purchasing trends, and regional challenges.
   • Refine your marketing strategies and outreach efforts to align with market priorities.

4. AI-Driven Enrichment

   • Profiles enriched with actionable data allow for personalized messaging, highlight unique value propositions, and improve engagement outcomes.

Strategic Use Cases:

1. Marketing Campaigns and Outreach

   • Promote e-commerce solutions, logistics services, or digital commerce tools to businesses and professionals in the APAC region.
   • Use verified contact data for multi-channel outreach, including email, phone, and social media campaigns.

2. Partnership Development and Vendor Collaboration

   • Build relationships with e-commerce marketplaces, logistics providers, and payment solution companies seeking strategic partnerships.
   • Foster collaborations that drive operational efficiency, enhance customer experiences, or expand market reach.

3. Market Research and Competitive Analysis

   • Analyze regional e-commerce trends, consumer preferences, and logistics challenges to refine product offerings and business strategies.
   • Benchmark against competitors to identify growth opportunities and high-demand solutions.

4. Recruitment and Talent Acquisition

   • Target HR professionals and hiring managers in the e-commerce industry recruiting for roles in operations, logistics, and digital marketing.
   • Provide workforce optimization platforms or training solutions tailored to the digital commerce sector.

Why Choose Success.ai?

1. Best Price Guarantee

   • Access premium-quality e-commerce store data at competitive prices, ensuring strong ROI for your marketing, sales, and strategic initiatives.

2. Seamless Integration

   • Integrate verified e-commerce data into CRM systems, analytics platforms, or market...

About this dataset

Context

The dataset presents the the household distribution across 16 income brackets among four distinct age groups in Excel: Under 25 years, 25-44 years, 45-64 years, and over 65 years. The dataset highlights the variation in household income, offering valuable insights into economic trends and disparities within different age categories, aiding in data analysis and decision-making..

Key observations

• Upon closer examination of the distribution of households among age brackets, it reveals that there are 2(1.12%) households where the householder is under 25 years old, 72(40.45%) households with a householder aged between 25 and 44 years, 38(21.35%) households with a householder aged between 45 and 64 years, and 66(37.08%) households where the householder is over 65 years old.
• In Excel, the age group of 25 to 44 years stands out with both the highest median income and the maximum share of households. This alignment suggests a financially stable demographic, indicating an established community with stable careers and higher incomes.

Content

When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2017-2021 5-Year Estimates.

Income brackets:

• Less than $10,000
• $10,000 to $14,999
• $15,000 to $19,999
• $20,000 to $24,999
• $25,000 to $29,999
• $30,000 to $34,999
• $35,000 to $39,999
• $40,000 to $44,999
• $45,000 to $49,999
• $50,000 to $59,999
• $60,000 to $74,999
• $75,000 to $99,999
• $100,000 to $124,999
• $125,000 to $149,999
• $150,000 to $199,999
• $200,000 or more

Variables / Data Columns

• Household Income: This column showcases 16 income brackets ranging from Under $10,000 to $200,000+ ( As mentioned above).
• Under 25 years: The count of households led by a head of household under 25 years old with income within a specified income bracket.
• 25 to 44 years: The count of households led by a head of household 25 to 44 years old with income within a specified income bracket.
• 45 to 64 years: The count of households led by a head of household 45 to 64 years old with income within a specified income bracket.
• 65 years and over: The count of households led by a head of household 65 years and over old with income within a specified income bracket.

Good to know

Margin of Error

Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.

Custom data

If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.

Inspiration

Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.

Recommended for further research

This dataset is a part of the main dataset for Excel median household income by age. You can refer the same here

The media analysis data was collected for commercial purposes. They are used in media planning as well as in the advertising planning of the different media genres (radio, press media, TV, poster and since 2010 also online). They are cross-sections that are merged together for one year. ag.ma kindly provides the data for scientific use on an annual basis – with a two-year notice period – to GESIS. In addition, agof has provided documentation regarding data collection (questionnaires, code plans, etc.) for the preparation of the MA IntermediaPlus online bundle. In order to make the data accessible for scientific use, the datasets of the individual years were harmonized and pooled into a longitudinal data set starting in 2014 as part of the dissertation project ´Audience and Market Fragmentation online´ of the Digital Society research program NRW at the Heinrich-Heine-University (HHU) and the University of Applied Sciences Düsseldorf (HSD), funded by the Ministry of Culture and Science of the German State of North Rhine-Westphalia. The prepared Longitudinal IntermediaPlus dataset 2014 to 2016 is a ´big data´, which is why the entire dataset will only be available in the form of a database (MySQL). In this database, the information of different variables of a respondent is organized in one column, one row per variable. The present data documentation shows the total database for online media use of the years 2014 to 2016. The data contains all variables of socio demography, free-time activities, additional information on a respondent and his household as well as the interview-specific variables and weights. Only the variables concerning the respondent´s media use are a selection: The online media use of all full online as well as their single entities for all genres whose business model is the provision of content is included - e-commerce, games, etc. were excluded. The media use of radio, print and TV is not included. Preparation for further years is possible, as is the preparation of cross-media media use for radio, press media and TV. Harmonization is available for radio and press media up to 2015 waiting to be applied. The digital process chain developed for data preparation and harmonization is published at GESIS and available for further projects updating the time series for further years. Recourse to these documents - Excel files, scripts, harmonization plans, etc. - is strongly recommended. The process and harmonization for the Longitudinal IntermediaPlus for 2014 to 2016 database was made available in accordance with the FAIR principles (Wilkinson et al. 2016). By harmonizing and pooling the cross-sectional datasets to one longitudinal dataset – which is being carried out by Inga Brentel and Céline Fabienne Kampes as part of the dissertation project ´Audience and Market Fragmentation online´ –, the aim is to make the data source of the media analysis, accessible for research on social and media change in Germany. Die Media-Analyse Daten wurden zu kommerziellen Zwecken erhoben. Sie werden in der Mediaplanung sowie der Werbeplanung der unterschiedlichen Mediengattungen (Radio, Pressemedien, TV, Plakat und seit 2010 auch Online) eingesetzt. Es handelt sich um Querschnitte, die für ein Jahr aneinandergereiht werden. Die ag.ma stellt freundlicherweise jährlich – mit einer Frist von zwei Jahren – die entsprechenden Daten der GESIS zur wissenschaftlichen Nutzung bereit. Zusätzlich hat die agof für die Aufbereitung der Online-Tranche der MA IntermediaPlus Unterlagen bezüglich der Datenerhebung (Fragebögen, Codepläne, usw.) bereitgestellt. Um die Daten für die wissenschaftliche Nutzung zugänglich zu machen, wurden ab 2018 im Rahmen des Dissertationsprojektes „Angebots- und Publikumsfragmentierung online“ des Graduiertenkollegs Digitale Gesellschaft NRW an der Heinrich-Heine-Universität (HHU) sowie der Hochschule Düsseldorf (HSD) gefördert durch das Ministerium für Kultur und Wissenschaft des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen die Datensätze der einzelnen Jahre zu einem Längsschnitt-Datensatz ab 2014 harmonisiert. Bei dem aufbereiteten Längsschnitt-Datensatz 2014 bis 2016 handelt es sich um „Big-Data“, weshalb der Gesamtdatensatz nur in Form einer Datenbank (MySQL) verfügbar ist. In dieser Datenbank liegt die Information verschiedener Variablen eines Befragten untereinander. Die vorliegende Datendokumentation zeigt den Gesamtdatensatz für die Jahre 2014 bis 2016 für die Online-Mediennutzung. Folgende Variablengruppen wurden neben der Soziodemografie im Rahmen der vorliegenden Studie erhoben bzw. für den Längsschnittdatensatz harmonisiert: Freizeitverhalten, Zusatzinformation zum Befragten und dessen Haushalt wie Geräte im Haushalt, Online-Mediennutzung Content sowie interviewspezifische Variablen und Gewichte. Lediglich bei den Variablen bezüglich der Mediennutzung des Befragten, handelt es sich um eine Auswahl: es ist ausschließlich die Onlinemediennutzung aller Gesamtangebote sowie der Einzelangebote aller Genre, deren Geschäftsmodell auf der Bereitstellung von Inhalten (Content) basiert, aufgenommen – E-Commerce, Spiele, etc. wurden ausgeschlossen. Die Mediennutzung von Radio, Print und TV wurde nicht berücksichtigt. Eine Aufbereitung für weitere Jahre nach 2017 ist grundsätzlich möglich, ebenso die Aufbereitung crossmedialer Mediennutzung für Radio, Pressemedien und TV. Unterlagen zur Harmonisierung liegen für Radio und Pressemedien bis 2015 vor. Die erarbeitete digitale Prozesskette zur Datenaufbereitung und -harmonisierung ist bei GESIS publiziert und für weitere Aufbereitungsschritte verfügbar. Der Rückgriff auf diese Unterlagen – Excel-Dateien, Skripte, Harmonisierungspläne, usw. – wird ausdrücklich empfohlen. Die Aufbereitung und Harmonisierung des Längsschnitts des Gesamtdatensatzes der MA IntermediaPlus für 2014 bis 2016 erfolgte unter Berücksichtigung der FAIR-Prinzipien (Wilkinson et al. 2016). Ziel ist es durch die Harmonisierung der einzelnen Querschnitte die Datenquelle der Media-Analyse, die im Rahmen des Dissertationsprojektes „Angebots- und Publikumsfragmentierung online“ durch Inga Brentel und Céline Fabienne Kampes erfolgte, für Forschung zum sozialen und medialen Wandel in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland zugänglich zu machen.

A dataset of synchrotron X-ray diffraction (SXRD) analysis files, recording the refinement of crystallographic texture from a number of Ti-6Al-4V (Ti-64) sample matrices, containing a total of 93 hot-rolled samples, from three different orthogonal sample directions. The aim of the work was to accurately quantify bulk macro-texture for both the α (hexagonal close packed, hcp) and β (body-centred cubic, bcc) phases across a range of different processing conditions.

Material

Prior to the experiment, the Ti-64 materials had been hot-rolled at a range of different temperatures, and to different reductions, followed by air-cooling, using a rolling mill at The University of Manchester. Rectangular specimens (6 mm x 5 mm x 2 mm) were then machined from the centre of these rolled blocks, and from the starting material. The samples were cut along different orthogonal rolling directions and are referenced according to alignment of the rolling directions (RD – rolling direction, TD – transverse direction, ND – normal direction) with the long horizontal (X) axis and short vertical (Y) axis of the rectangular specimens. Samples of the same orientation were glued together to form matrices for the synchrotron analysis. The material, rolling conditions, sample orientations and experiment reference numbers used for the synchrotron diffraction analysis are included in the data as an excel spreadsheet.

SXRD Data Collection

Data was recorded using a high energy 90 keV synchrotron X-ray beam and a 5 second exposure at the detector for each measurement point. The slits were adjusted to give a 0.5 x 0.5 mm beam area, chosen to optimally resolve both the α and β phase peaks. The SXRD data was recorded by stage-scanning the beam in sequential X-Y positions at 0.5 mm increments across the rectangular sample matrices, containing a number of samples glued together, to analyse a total of 93 samples from the different processing conditions and orientations. Post-processing of the data was then used to sort the data into a rectangular grid of measurement points from each individual sample.

Diffraction Pattern Averaging

The stage-scan diffraction pattern images from each matrix were sorted into individual samples, and the images averaged together for each specimen, using a Python notebook sxrd-tiff-summer. The averaged .tiff images each capture average diffraction peak intensities from an area of about 30 mm2 (equivalent to a total volume of ~ 60 mm3), with three different sample orientations then used to calculate the bulk crystallographic texture from each rolling condition.

SXRD Data Analysis

A new Fourier-based peak fitting method from the Continuous-Peak-Fit Python package was used to fit full diffraction pattern ring intensities, using a range of different lattice plane peaks for determining crystallographic texture in both the α and β phases. Bulk texture was calculated by combining the ring intensities from three different sample orientations.

A .poni calibration file was created using Dioptas, through a refinement matching peak intensities from a LaB6 or CeO2 standard diffraction pattern image. Two calibrations were needed as some of the data was collected in July 2022 and some of the data was collected in August 2022. Dioptas was then used to determine peak bounds in 2θ for characterising a total of 22 α and 4 β lattice plane rings from the averaged Ti-64 diffraction pattern images, which were recorded in a .py input script. Using these two inputs, Continuous-Peak-Fit automatically converts full diffraction pattern rings into profiles of intensity versus azimuthal angle, for each 2θ section, which can also include multiple overlapping α and β peaks.

The Continuous-Peak-Fit refinement can be launched in a notebook or from the terminal, to automatically calculate a full mathematical description, in the form of Fourier expansion terms, to match the intensity variation of each individual lattice plane ring. The results for peak position, intensity and half-width for all 22 α and 4 β lattice plane peaks were recorded at an azimuthal resolution of 1º and stored in a .fit output file. Details for setting up and running this analysis can be found in the continuous-peak-fit-analysis package. This package also includes a Python script for extracting lattice plane ring intensity distributions from the .fit files, matching the intensity values with spherical polar coordinates to parametrise the intensity distributions from each of the three different sample orientations, in the form of pole figures. The script can also be used to combine intensity distributions from different sample orientations. The final intensity variations are recorded for each of the lattice plane peaks as text files, which can be loaded into MTEX to plot and analyse both the α and β phase crystallographic texture.

Metadata

An accompanying YAML text file contains associated SXRD beamline metadata for each measurement. The raw data is in the form of synchrotron diffraction pattern .tiff images which were too large to upload to Zenodo and are instead stored on The University of Manchester's Research Database Storage (RDS) repository. The raw data can therefore be obtained by emailing the authors.

The material data folder documents the machining of the samples and the sample orientations.

The associated processing metadata for the Continuous-Peak-Fit analyses records information about the different packages used to process the data, along with details about the different files contained within this analysis dataset.

MealMe provides comprehensive grocery and retail SKU-level product data, including real-time pricing, from the top 100 retailers in the USA and Canada. Our proprietary technology ensures accurate and up-to-date insights, empowering businesses to excel in competitive intelligence, pricing strategies, and market analysis.

Retailers Covered: MealMe’s database includes detailed SKU-level data and pricing from leading grocery and retail chains such as Walmart, Target, Costco, Kroger, Safeway, Publix, Whole Foods, Aldi, ShopRite, BJ’s Wholesale Club, Sprouts Farmers Market, Albertsons, Ralphs, Pavilions, Gelson’s, Vons, Shaw’s, Metro, and many more. Our coverage spans the most influential retailers across North America, ensuring businesses have the insights needed to stay competitive in dynamic markets.

Key Features: SKU-Level Granularity: Access detailed product-level data, including product descriptions, categories, brands, and variations. Real-Time Pricing: Monitor current pricing trends across major retailers for comprehensive market comparisons. Regional Insights: Analyze geographic price variations and inventory availability to identify trends and opportunities. Customizable Solutions: Tailored data delivery options to meet the specific needs of your business or industry. Use Cases: Competitive Intelligence: Gain visibility into pricing, product availability, and assortment strategies of top retailers like Walmart, Costco, and Target. Pricing Optimization: Use real-time data to create dynamic pricing models that respond to market conditions. Market Research: Identify trends, gaps, and consumer preferences by analyzing SKU-level data across leading retailers. Inventory Management: Streamline operations with accurate, real-time inventory availability. Retail Execution: Ensure on-shelf product availability and compliance with merchandising strategies. Industries Benefiting from Our Data CPG (Consumer Packaged Goods): Optimize product positioning, pricing, and distribution strategies. E-commerce Platforms: Enhance online catalogs with precise pricing and inventory information. Market Research Firms: Conduct detailed analyses to uncover industry trends and opportunities. Retailers: Benchmark against competitors like Kroger and Aldi to refine assortments and pricing. AI & Analytics Companies: Fuel predictive models and business intelligence with reliable SKU-level data. Data Delivery and Integration MealMe offers flexible integration options, including APIs and custom data exports, for seamless access to real-time data. Whether you need large-scale analysis or continuous updates, our solutions scale with your business needs.

Why Choose MealMe? Comprehensive Coverage: Data from the top 100 grocery and retail chains in North America, including Walmart, Target, and Costco. Real-Time Accuracy: Up-to-date pricing and product information ensures competitive edge. Customizable Insights: Tailored datasets align with your specific business objectives. Proven Expertise: Trusted by diverse industries for delivering actionable insights. MealMe empowers businesses to unlock their full potential with real-time, high-quality grocery and retail data. For more information or to schedule a demo, contact us today!