1 dataset found
  1. f

    DataSheet_1_Automated data preparation for in vivo tumor characterization...

    • frontiersin.figshare.com
    docx
    Updated Jun 13, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Denis Krajnc; Clemens P. Spielvogel; Marko Grahovac; Boglarka Ecsedi; Sazan Rasul; Nina Poetsch; Tatjana Traub-Weidinger; Alexander R. Haug; Zsombor Ritter; Hussain Alizadeh; Marcus Hacker; Thomas Beyer; Laszlo Papp (2023). DataSheet_1_Automated data preparation for in vivo tumor characterization with machine learning.docx [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.1017911.s001
    Explore at:
    docxAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 13, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Frontiers
    Authors
    Denis Krajnc; Clemens P. Spielvogel; Marko Grahovac; Boglarka Ecsedi; Sazan Rasul; Nina Poetsch; Tatjana Traub-Weidinger; Alexander R. Haug; Zsombor Ritter; Hussain Alizadeh; Marcus Hacker; Thomas Beyer; Laszlo Papp
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    BackgroundThis study proposes machine learning-driven data preparation (MLDP) for optimal data preparation (DP) prior to building prediction models for cancer cohorts.MethodsA collection of well-established DP methods were incorporated for building the DP pipelines for various clinical cohorts prior to machine learning. Evolutionary algorithm principles combined with hyperparameter optimization were employed to iteratively select the best fitting subset of data preparation algorithms for the given dataset. The proposed method was validated for glioma and prostate single center cohorts by 100-fold Monte Carlo (MC) cross-validation scheme with 80-20% training-validation split ratio. In addition, a dual-center diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) cohort was utilized with Center 1 as training and Center 2 as independent validation datasets to predict cohort-specific clinical endpoints. Five machine learning (ML) classifiers were employed for building prediction models across all analyzed cohorts. Predictive performance was estimated by confusion matrix analytics over the validation sets of each cohort. The performance of each model with and without MLDP, as well as with manually-defined DP were compared in each of the four cohorts.ResultsSixteen of twenty established predictive models demonstrated area under the receiver operator characteristics curve (AUC) performance increase utilizing the MLDP. The MLDP resulted in the highest performance increase for random forest (RF) (+0.16 AUC) and support vector machine (SVM) (+0.13 AUC) model schemes for predicting 36-months survival in the glioma cohort. Single center cohorts resulted in complex (6-7 DP steps) DP pipelines, with a high occurrence of outlier detection, feature selection and synthetic majority oversampling technique (SMOTE). In contrast, the optimal DP pipeline for the dual-center DLBCL cohort only included outlier detection and SMOTE DP steps.ConclusionsThis study demonstrates that data preparation prior to ML prediction model building in cancer cohorts shall be ML-driven itself, yielding optimal prediction models in both single and multi-centric settings.

  2. Not seeing a result you expected?
    Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Denis Krajnc; Clemens P. Spielvogel; Marko Grahovac; Boglarka Ecsedi; Sazan Rasul; Nina Poetsch; Tatjana Traub-Weidinger; Alexander R. Haug; Zsombor Ritter; Hussain Alizadeh; Marcus Hacker; Thomas Beyer; Laszlo Papp (2023). DataSheet_1_Automated data preparation for in vivo tumor characterization with machine learning.docx [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.1017911.s001

DataSheet_1_Automated data preparation for in vivo tumor characterization with machine learning.docx

Related Article
Explore at:
docxAvailable download formats
Dataset updated
Jun 13, 2023
Dataset provided by
Frontiers
Authors
Denis Krajnc; Clemens P. Spielvogel; Marko Grahovac; Boglarka Ecsedi; Sazan Rasul; Nina Poetsch; Tatjana Traub-Weidinger; Alexander R. Haug; Zsombor Ritter; Hussain Alizadeh; Marcus Hacker; Thomas Beyer; Laszlo Papp
License

Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically

Description

BackgroundThis study proposes machine learning-driven data preparation (MLDP) for optimal data preparation (DP) prior to building prediction models for cancer cohorts.MethodsA collection of well-established DP methods were incorporated for building the DP pipelines for various clinical cohorts prior to machine learning. Evolutionary algorithm principles combined with hyperparameter optimization were employed to iteratively select the best fitting subset of data preparation algorithms for the given dataset. The proposed method was validated for glioma and prostate single center cohorts by 100-fold Monte Carlo (MC) cross-validation scheme with 80-20% training-validation split ratio. In addition, a dual-center diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) cohort was utilized with Center 1 as training and Center 2 as independent validation datasets to predict cohort-specific clinical endpoints. Five machine learning (ML) classifiers were employed for building prediction models across all analyzed cohorts. Predictive performance was estimated by confusion matrix analytics over the validation sets of each cohort. The performance of each model with and without MLDP, as well as with manually-defined DP were compared in each of the four cohorts.ResultsSixteen of twenty established predictive models demonstrated area under the receiver operator characteristics curve (AUC) performance increase utilizing the MLDP. The MLDP resulted in the highest performance increase for random forest (RF) (+0.16 AUC) and support vector machine (SVM) (+0.13 AUC) model schemes for predicting 36-months survival in the glioma cohort. Single center cohorts resulted in complex (6-7 DP steps) DP pipelines, with a high occurrence of outlier detection, feature selection and synthetic majority oversampling technique (SMOTE). In contrast, the optimal DP pipeline for the dual-center DLBCL cohort only included outlier detection and SMOTE DP steps.ConclusionsThis study demonstrates that data preparation prior to ML prediction model building in cancer cohorts shall be ML-driven itself, yielding optimal prediction models in both single and multi-centric settings.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu