Graphs for all figures are provided along with codes that implement the results described in the paper. We simulate how a spin chain subject to timed local pulses develops long-range entanglement and how timed pulses can also drive a Hubbard chain to a maximally-correlated $\eta$-pairing state. All simulations are performed using exact diagonalization in Mathematica. In Figure 2 we obtain how the central-spin magnetization and the bipartite entanglement in an XY spin-1/2 chain evolves in time. We also obtain the distribution among symmetry sectors with different levels of entanglement and concurrence matrices that show the build-up of long-range Bell pairs. In Figure 3 we show how the result generalizes to larger systems and how the entanglement and preparation time scale with the system size. We also show how the protocol is not sensitive to random timing error of the pulses. In Figure 4 we calculate how the fidelity is affected by several types of imperfections, showing it is relatively robust. In Figure 7 we compute experimentally measurable spin-spin correlations at different stages of the protocol. In Figure 8 we calculate level statistics in the presence of integrability breaking and show that the scaling of entanglement and preparation time are largely unaffected. In Figure 5 we illustrate the protocol for $\eta$-pairing by simulating the evolution of a strongly-interacting, finite Hubbard chain. In Figure 6 we compute signatures of $eta$ pairing, including the average number of $\eta$ pairs, their momentum distribution, and the overlap with the maximally-correlated state as a function of system size.

Home-range estimation is an important application of animal tracking data that is frequently complicated by autocorrelation, sampling irregularity, and small effective sample sizes. We introduce a novel, optimal weighting method that accounts for temporal sampling bias in autocorrelated tracking data. This method corrects for irregular and missing data, such that oversampled times are downweighted and undersampled times are upweighted to minimize error in the home-range estimate. We also introduce computationally efficient algorithms that make this method feasible with large datasets. Generally speaking, there are three situations where weight optimization improves the accuracy of home-range estimates: with marine data, where the sampling schedule is highly irregular, with duty cycled data, where the sampling schedule changes during the observation period, and when a small number of home-range crossings are observed, making the beginning and end times more independent and informative than the intermediate times. Using both simulated data and empirical examples including reef manta ray, Mongolian gazelle, and African buffalo, optimal weighting is shown to reduce the error and increase the spatial resolution of home-range estimates. With a conveniently packaged and computationally efficient software implementation, this method broadens the array of datasets with which accurate space-use assessments can be made.

New physicochemical data for perfluoro(7-methylbicyclo[4.3.0]nonane) and perfluoro(butylcyclohexane) with a purity ≥ 0.991 mass fraction are presented: the temperature and heat of the solid–liquid phase transition, the dependence of saturated vapor pressure, viscosity, density (liquid molar volume), and refractive index on temperature; the coefficients of the Antoine equation; 19F and 13C NMR and FTIR spectra; and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry data. For the perfluoro(7-methylbicyclo[4.3.0]nonane)–perfluoro(butylcyclohexane) binary system, the dependences are given: refractive index (at 15 °C) and density (at 20 °C) on the composition and boiling point on the composition in the pressure range from 20 kPa to atmospheric pressure. The average integral value of the relative volatility coefficient for various concentration ranges at atmospheric pressure is determined.

The U.S. Geological Survey has been characterizing the regional variation in shear stress on the sea floor and sediment mobility through statistical descriptors. The purpose of this project is to identify patterns in stress in order to inform habitat delineation or decisions for anthropogenic use of the continental shelf. The statistical characterization spans the continental shelf from the coast to approximately 120 m water depth, at approximately 5 km resolution. Time-series of wave and circulation are created using numerical models, and near-bottom output of steady and oscillatory velocities and an estimate of bottom roughness are used to calculate a time-series of bottom shear stress at 1-hour intervals. Statistical descriptions such as the median and 95th percentile, which are the output included with this database, are then calculated to create a two-dimensional picture of the regional patterns in shear stress. In addition, time-series of stress are compared to critical stress values at select points calculated from observed surface sediment texture data to determine estimates of sea floor mobility.

This dataset consists of mathematical question and answer pairs, from a range of question types at roughly school-level difficulty. This is designed to test the mathematical learning and algebraic reasoning skills of learning models.

## Example questions

 Question: Solve -42*r + 27*c = -1167 and 130*r + 4*c = 372 for r.
 Answer: 4
 
 Question: Calculate -841880142.544 + 411127.
 Answer: -841469015.544
 
 Question: Let x(g) = 9*g + 1. Let q(c) = 2*c + 1. Let f(i) = 3*i - 39. Let w(j) = q(x(j)). Calculate f(w(a)).
 Answer: 54*a - 30

It contains 2 million (question, answer) pairs per module, with questions limited to 160 characters in length, and answers to 30 characters in length. Note the training data for each question type is split into "train-easy", "train-medium", and "train-hard". This allows training models via a curriculum. The data can also be mixed together uniformly from these training datasets to obtain the results reported in the paper. Categories:

• algebra (linear equations, polynomial roots, sequences)
• arithmetic (pairwise operations and mixed expressions, surds)
• calculus (differentiation)
• comparison (closest numbers, pairwise comparisons, sorting)
• measurement (conversion, working with time)
• numbers (base conversion, remainders, common divisors and multiples, primality, place value, rounding numbers)
• polynomials (addition, simplification, composition, evaluating, expansion)
• probability (sampling without replacement)

The USDA Agricultural Research Service (ARS) recently established SCINet , which consists of a shared high performance computing resource, Ceres, and the dedicated high-speed Internet2 network used to access Ceres. Current and potential SCINet users are using and generating very large datasets so SCINet needs to be provisioned with adequate data storage for their active computing. It is not designed to hold data beyond active research phases. At the same time, the National Agricultural Library has been developing the Ag Data Commons, a research data catalog and repository designed for public data release and professional data curation. Ag Data Commons needs to anticipate the size and nature of data it will be tasked with handling. The ARS Web-enabled Databases Working Group, organized under the SCINet initiative, conducted a study to establish baseline data storage needs and practices, and to make projections that could inform future infrastructure design, purchases, and policies. The SCINet Web-enabled Databases Working Group helped develop the survey which is the basis for an internal report. While the report was for internal use, the survey and resulting data may be generally useful and are being released publicly. From October 24 to November 8, 2016 we administered a 17-question survey (Appendix A) by emailing a Survey Monkey link to all ARS Research Leaders, intending to cover data storage needs of all 1,675 SY (Category 1 and Category 4) scientists. We designed the survey to accommodate either individual researcher responses or group responses. Research Leaders could decide, based on their unit's practices or their management preferences, whether to delegate response to a data management expert in their unit, to all members of their unit, or to themselves collate responses from their unit before reporting in the survey. Larger storage ranges cover vastly different amounts of data so the implications here could be significant depending on whether the true amount is at the lower or higher end of the range. Therefore, we requested more detail from "Big Data users," those 47 respondents who indicated they had more than 10 to 100 TB or over 100 TB total current data (Q5). All other respondents are called "Small Data users." Because not all of these follow-up requests were successful, we used actual follow-up responses to estimate likely responses for those who did not respond. We defined active data as data that would be used within the next six months. All other data would be considered inactive, or archival. To calculate per person storage needs we used the high end of the reported range divided by 1 for an individual response, or by G, the number of individuals in a group response. For Big Data users we used the actual reported values or estimated likely values. Resources in this dataset:Resource Title: Appendix A: ARS data storage survey questions. File Name: Appendix A.pdfResource Description: The full list of questions asked with the possible responses. The survey was not administered using this PDF but the PDF was generated directly from the administered survey using the Print option under Design Survey. Asterisked questions were required. A list of Research Units and their associated codes was provided in a drop down not shown here. Resource Software Recommended: Adobe Acrobat,url: https://get.adobe.com/reader/ Resource Title: CSV of Responses from ARS Researcher Data Storage Survey. File Name: Machine-readable survey response data.csvResource Description: CSV file includes raw responses from the administered survey, as downloaded unfiltered from Survey Monkey, including incomplete responses. Also includes additional classification and calculations to support analysis. Individual email addresses and IP addresses have been removed. This information is that same data as in the Excel spreadsheet (also provided).Resource Title: Responses from ARS Researcher Data Storage Survey. File Name: Data Storage Survey Data for public release.xlsxResource Description: MS Excel worksheet that Includes raw responses from the administered survey, as downloaded unfiltered from Survey Monkey, including incomplete responses. Also includes additional classification and calculations to support analysis. Individual email addresses and IP addresses have been removed.Resource Software Recommended: Microsoft Excel,url: https://products.office.com/en-us/excel

GLAH05 Level-1B waveform parameterization data include output parameters from the waveform characterization procedure and other parameters required to calculate surface slope and relief characteristics. GLAH05 contains parameterizations of both the transmitted and received pulses and other characteristics from which elevation and footprint-scale roughness and slope are calculated. The received pulse characterization uses two implementations of the retracking algorithms: one tuned for ice sheets, called the standard parameterization, used to calculate surface elevation for ice sheets, oceans, and sea ice; and another for land (the alternative parameterization). Each data granule has an associated browse product.

Important Note: This beta item will be retired in December 2026. A new version of this item is available for your use. Esri recommends updating your maps and apps to use the new version.This layer represents CMIP6 future projections of mean diurnal range. Diurnal range is a measure of daily daytime to nighttime temperature range. However, this layer provides the mean of the monthly temperature ranges (monthly maximum minus monthly minimum). Since the climate data inputs are monthly or averaged months across multiple years, this calculation uses recorded temperature fluctuation within a month to capture diurnal temperature range. Using monthly averages in this manner is mathematically equivalent to calculating the temperature range for each day in a month, and averaging these values for the month.WorldClim produced this projection as part of a series of 19 bioclimate variables identified by the USGS and provides this description:"Bioclimatic variables are derived from the monthly temperature and rainfall values in order to generate more biologically meaningful variables. These are often used in species distribution modeling and related ecological modeling techniques. The bioclimatic variables represent annual trends (e.g., mean annual temperature, annual precipitation) seasonality (e.g., annual range in temperature and precipitation) and extreme or limiting environmental factors (e.g., temperature of the coldest and warmest month, and precipitation of the wet and dry quarters). A quarter is a period of three months (1/4 of the year)."Time Extent: averages from 2021-2040, 2041-2060, 2061-2080, 2081-2100Units: deg CCell Size: 2.5 minutes (~5 km)Source Type: StretchedPixel Type: 32 Bit FloatData Projection: GCS WGS84Mosaic Projection: GCS WGS84Extent: GlobalSource: WorldClim CMIP6 Bioclimate Climate ScenariosThe CMIP6 climate experiments use Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs) to model future climate scenarios. Each SSP pairs a human/community behavior component with the traditional RCP greenhouse gas forcing from the previous CMIP5. Three SSPs were chosen by Esri to be included in the service based on user requests: SSP2 4.5, SSP3 7.0 and SSP5 8.5.SSPScenarioEstimated warming(2041–2060)Estimated warming(2081–2100)Very likely range in °C(2081–2100)SSP2-4.5intermediate GHG emissions:CO2 emissions around current levels until 2050, then falling but not reaching net zero by 21002.0 °C2.7 °C2.1 – 3.5SSP3-7.0high GHG emissions:CO2 emissions double by 21002.1 °C3.6 °C2.8 – 4.6SSP5-8.5very high GHG emissions:CO2 emissions triple by 20752.4 °C4.4 °C3.3 – 5.7While the 8.5 scenario is no longer generally considered likely, SSP3 7.0 has been included and is considered the high end of possibilities. SSP5 8.5 has been retained since many organizations report to this threshold. The warming associated with SSP2 4.5 is equivalent to the global targets set at the 2021 United Nations COP26 meetings in Glasgow. Processing the Climate DataWorldClim provides 20-year averaged outputs for the various SSPs from 24 global climate models. A selection of 13 models were averaged for each variable and time based on Mahony et al 2022. These models included ACCESS-ESM1-5, BCC-CSM2-MR, CanESM5, CNRM-ESM2-1, EC-Earth3-Veg, GFDL-ESM4, GISS-E2-1-G, INM-CM5-0, IPSL-CM6A-LR, MIROC6, MPI-ESM1-2-HR, MRI-ESM2-0, UKESM1-0-LL. GFDL-ESM4 was not available for SSP2 4.5 or SSP5 8.5. Accessing the Multidimensional InformationThe time and SSP scenario are built into the layer using a multidimensional raster. Enable the time slider to move across the 20-year average periods. In ArcGIS Online and Pro, use the Multidimensional Filter to select the SSP (SSP2 4.5 is the default). What can you do with this layer?These multidimensional imagery tiles support analysis using ArcGIS Online or Pro. Use the Bioclimate Baseline layer to see the difference in pixels and calculate change from the historic period into the future. Use the Multidimensional tab in ArcGIS Pro to access a variety of useful tools. Each layer or variable can be styled using the Image Display options. Known Quality IssuesEach model is downscaled from ~100km resolution to ~5km resolution by WorldClim. Some artifacts are inevitable, especially at a global scale. Some variables have distinct transitions, especially in Greenland. Also, SSP2 4.5 has missing data for several variables in Antarctica.Related LayersBioclimate 1 Annual Mean TemperatureBioclimate 2 Mean Diurnal RangeBioclimate 3 IsothermalityBioclimate 4 Temperature SeasonalityBioclimate 5 Max Temperature of Warmest MonthBioclimate 6 Min Temperature Of Coldest MonthBioclimate 7 Temperature Annual RangeBioclimate 8 Mean Temperature Of Wettest QuarterBioclimate 9 Mean Temperature Of Driest QuarterBioclimate 10 Mean Temperature Of Warmest QuarterBioclimate 11 Mean Temperature Of Coldest QuarterBioclimate 12 Annual PrecipitationBioclimate 13 Precipitation Of Wettest MonthBioclimate 14 Precipitation Of Driest MonthBioclimate 15 Precipitation SeasonalityBioclimate 16 Precipitation Of Wettest QuarterBioclimate 17 Precipitation Of Driest QuarterBioclimate 18 Precipitation Of Warmest QuarterBioclimate 19 Precipitation Of Coldest QuarterBioclimate Baseline 1970-2000

Five chemicals [2-ethylhexyl 4-hydroxybenzoate (2-EHHB), 4-nonylphenol-branched (4-NP), 4-tert-octylphenol (4-OP), benzyl butyl phthalate (BBP) and dibutyl phthalate (DBP) were subjected to a 21-day Amphibian Metamorphosis Assay (AMA) following OCSPP 890.1100 test guidelines. The selected chemicals exhibited estrogenic or androgenic bioactivity in high throughput screening data obtained from US EPA ToxCast models. Xenopus laevis larvae were exposed nominally to each chemical at 3.6, 10.9, 33.0 and 100 µg/L, except 4-NP for which concentrations were 1.8, 5.5, 16.5 and 50 µg/L. Endpoint data (daily or given study day (SD)) collected included: mortality (daily), developmental stage (SD 7 and 21), hind limb length (HLL) (SD 7 and 21), snout-vent length (SVL) (SD 7 and 21), wet body weight (BW) (SD 7 and 21), and thyroid histopathology (SD 21). 4-OP and BBP caused accelerated development compared to controls at the mean measured concentration of 39.8 and 3.5 µg/L, respectively. Normalized HLL was increased on SD 21 for all chemicals except 4-NP. Histopathology revealed mild thyroid follicular cell hypertrophy at all BBP concentrations, while moderate thyroid follicular cell hypertrophy occurred at the 105 µg /L BBP concentration. Evidence of accelerated metamorphic development was also observed histopathologically in BBP-treated frogs at concentrations as low as 3.5 µg/L. Increased BW relative to control occurred for all chemicals except 4-OP. Increase in SVL was observed in larvae exposed to 4-NP, BBP and DBP on SD 21. With the exception of 4-NP, four of the chemicals tested appeared to alter thyroid axis-driven metamorphosis, albeit through different lines of evidence, with BBP and DBP providing the strongest evidence of effects on the thyroid axis. Citation information for this dataset can be found in Data.gov's References section.

Title of program: MARS-1-FOR-EFR-DWBA Catalogue Id: ABPB_v1_0

Nature of problem The package SATURN-MARS-1 consists of two programs SATURN and MARS for calculating cross sections of reactions transferring nucleon(s) primarily between two heavy ions. The calculations are made within the framework of the finite-range distorted wave Born approximation(DWBA). The first part, SATURN, prepares the form factor(s) either for exact finite (EFR) or for no-recoil (NR) approach. The prepared form factor is then used by the second part MARS to calculate either EFR-DWBA or NR-DWBA cross-s ...

Versions of this program held in the CPC repository in Mendeley Data abpb_v1_0; MARS-1-FOR-EFR-DWBA; 10.1016/0010-4655(74)90012-5

This program has been imported from the CPC Program Library held at Queen's University Belfast (1969-2019)

The databases ESTAR, PSTAR, and ASTAR calculate stopping-power and range tables for electrons, protons, or helium ions. Stopping-power and range tables can be calculated for electrons in any user-specified material and for protons and helium ions in 74 materials.

Raw data to calculate rate of adaptationRaw dataset for rate of adaptation calculations (Figure 1) and related statistics.dataall.csvR code to analyze raw data for rate of adaptationCompetition Analysis.RRaw data to calculate effective population sizesdatacount.csvR code to analayze effective population sizesR code used to analyze effective population sizes; Figure 2Cell Count Ne.RR code to determine our best estimate of the dominance coefficient in each environmentR code to produce figures 3, S4, S5 -- what is the best estimate of dominance? Note, competition and effective population size R code must be run first in the same session.what is h.R

Studies utilizing Global Positioning System (GPS) telemetry rarely result in 100% fix success rates (FSR). Many assessments of wildlife resource use do not account for missing data, either assuming data loss is random or because a lack of practical treatment for systematic data loss. Several studies have explored how the environment, technological features, and animal behavior influence rates of missing data in GPS telemetry, but previous spatially explicit models developed to correct for sampling bias have been specified to small study areas, on a small range of data loss, or to be species-specific, limiting their general utility. Here we explore environmental effects on GPS fix acquisition rates across a wide range of environmental conditions and detection rates for bias correction of terrestrial GPS-derived, large mammal habitat use. We also evaluate patterns in missing data that relate to potential animal activities that change the orientation of the antennae and characterize home-range probability of GPS detection for 4 focal species; cougars (Puma concolor), desert bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis nelsoni), Rocky Mountain elk (Cervus elaphus ssp. nelsoni) and mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus). Part 1, Positive Openness Raster (raster dataset): Openness is an angular measure of the relationship between surface relief and horizontal distance. For angles less than 90 degrees it is equivalent to the internal angle of a cone with its apex at a DEM _location, and is constrained by neighboring elevations within a specified radial distance. 480 meter search radius was used for this calculation of positive openness. Openness incorporates the terrain line-of-sight or viewshed concept and is calculated from multiple zenith and nadir angles-here along eight azimuths. Positive openness measures openness above the surface, with high values for convex forms and low values for concave forms (Yokoyama et al. 2002). We calculated positive openness using a custom python script, following the methods of Yokoyama et. al (2002) using a USGS National Elevation Dataset as input. Part 2, Northern Arizona GPS Test Collar (csv): Bias correction in GPS telemetry data-sets requires a strong understanding of the mechanisms that result in missing data. We tested wildlife GPS collars in a variety of environmental conditions to derive a predictive model of fix acquisition. We found terrain exposure and tall over-story vegetation are the primary environmental features that affect GPS performance. Model evaluation showed a strong correlation (0.924) between observed and predicted fix success rates (FSR) and showed little bias in predictions. The model's predictive ability was evaluated using two independent data-sets from stationary test collars of different make/model, fix interval programming, and placed at different study sites. No statistically significant differences (95% CI) between predicted and observed FSRs, suggest changes in technological factors have minor influence on the models ability to predict FSR in new study areas in the southwestern US. The model training data are provided here for fix attempts by hour. This table can be linked with the site _location shapefile using the site field. Part 3, Probability Raster (raster dataset): Bias correction in GPS telemetry datasets requires a strong understanding of the mechanisms that result in missing data. We tested wildlife GPS collars in a variety of environmental conditions to derive a predictive model of fix aquistion. We found terrain exposure and tall overstory vegetation are the primary environmental features that affect GPS performance. Model evaluation showed a strong correlation (0.924) between observed and predicted fix success rates (FSR) and showed little bias in predictions. The models predictive ability was evaluated using two independent datasets from stationary test collars of different make/model, fix interval programing, and placed at different study sites. No statistically significant differences (95% CI) between predicted and observed FSRs, suggest changes in technological factors have minor influence on the models ability to predict FSR in new study areas in the southwestern US. We evaluated GPS telemetry datasets by comparing the mean probability of a successful GPS fix across study animals home-ranges, to the actual observed FSR of GPS downloaded deployed collars on cougars (Puma concolor), desert bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis nelsoni), Rocky Mountain elk (Cervus elaphus ssp. nelsoni) and mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus). Comparing the mean probability of acquisition within study animals home-ranges and observed FSRs of GPS downloaded collars resulted in a approximatly 1:1 linear relationship with an r-sq= 0.68. Part 4, GPS Test Collar Sites (shapefile): Bias correction in GPS telemetry data-sets requires a strong understanding of the mechanisms that result in missing data. We tested wildlife GPS collars in a variety of environmental conditions to derive a predictive model of fix acquisition. We found terrain exposure and tall over-story vegetation are the primary environmental features that affect GPS performance. Model evaluation showed a strong correlation (0.924) between observed and predicted fix success rates (FSR) and showed little bias in predictions. The model's predictive ability was evaluated using two independent data-sets from stationary test collars of different make/model, fix interval programming, and placed at different study sites. No statistically significant differences (95% CI) between predicted and observed FSRs, suggest changes in technological factors have minor influence on the models ability to predict FSR in new study areas in the southwestern US. Part 5, Cougar Home Ranges (shapefile): Cougar home-ranges were calculated to compare the mean probability of a GPS fix acquisition across the home-range to the actual fix success rate (FSR) of the collar as a means for evaluating if characteristics of an animal’s home-range have an effect on observed FSR. We estimated home-ranges using the Local Convex Hull (LoCoH) method using the 90th isopleth. Data obtained from GPS download of retrieved units were only used. Satellite delivered data was omitted from the analysis for animals where the collar was lost or damaged because satellite delivery tends to lose as additional 10% of data. Comparisons with home-range mean probability of fix were also used as a reference for assessing if the frequency animals use areas of low GPS acquisition rates may play a role in observed FSRs. Part 6, Cougar Fix Success Rate by Hour (csv): Cougar GPS collar fix success varied by hour-of-day suggesting circadian rhythms with bouts of rest during daylight hours may change the orientation of the GPS receiver affecting the ability to acquire fixes. Raw data of overall fix success rates (FSR) and FSR by hour were used to predict relative reductions in FSR. Data only includes direct GPS download datasets. Satellite delivered data was omitted from the analysis for animals where the collar was lost or damaged because satellite delivery tends to lose approximately an additional 10% of data. Part 7, Openness Python Script version 2.0: This python script was used to calculate positive openness using a 30 meter digital elevation model for a large geographic area in Arizona, California, Nevada and Utah. A scientific research project used the script to explore environmental effects on GPS fix acquisition rates across a wide range of environmental conditions and detection rates for bias correction of terrestrial GPS-derived, large mammal habitat use.

This study estimates the association between temperature and self-reported mental health. We match individual-level mental health data for over three million Americans between 1993 and 2010 to historical daily weather information. We exploit the random fluctuations in temperature over time within counties to identify its effect on a 30-day measure of self-reported mental health. Compared to the temperature range of 60–70°F, cooler days in the past month reduce the probability of reporting days of bad mental health while hotter days increase this probability. We also find a salience effect: cooler days have an immediate effect, whereas hotter days tend to matter most after about 10 days. Using our estimates, we calculate the willingness to pay to avoid an additional hot day in terms of its impact on self-reported mental health.

Data analyzed in paper: Czechowski Z. Asymmetric Finite-Range Persistence in Time Series Generated by the Modified Discrete Langevin Model, Symmetry 2025, 17, 287.

Case: M3 (Eq. (14)), asymmetric persistence given by Eqs. (20), (21)

Table 1. Results of the analysis of excited primary-ion-beam admixtures possibly present in the experiment. The calculations were performed using the Cowan code [27]. The estimated fractions are the coefficients kE obtained from fitting equation (3) to the experimental data. Calculated excitation energies are given in column 4. The experimentally obtained ionization threshold energies (T.E.), T.E. taken from NIST Atomic Spectra Database [28] and T.E. calculated within the configuration-averaged approximation are provided in columns 5, 6 and 7, respectively. The estimated excited-levels' lifetimes and flight times of ions between the source and the interaction region are provided in the last two columns, respectively. The numbers in square brackets are powers of 10 to be multiplied with the preceding numbers, respectively. Abstract Electron-impact single-ionization cross sections of Snq + ions in charge states q = 4–13 with 4d[10 − (q − 4)] outer-shell configurations have been studied in the energy range from the corresponding thresholds up to 1000 eV. Absolute cross sections and fine-step energy-scan data have been measured employing the crossed-beams technique. Contributions of different ionization mechanisms have been analysed by comparing the experimental data with calculations employing the configuration-averaged distorted wave approximation. Ionization plasma rate coefficients inferred from the experimental data are also presented.

Analysis-ready tabular data from "Predicting spatial-temporal patterns of diet quality and large herbivore performance using satellite time series" in Ecological Applications, Kearney et al., 2021. Data is tabular data only, summarized to the pasture scale. Weight gain data for individual cattle and the STARFM-derived Landsat-MODIS fusion imagery can be made available upon request. Resources in this dataset:Resource Title: Metadata - CSV column names, units and descriptions. File Name: Kearney_et_al_ECOLAPPL_Patterns of herbivore - metada.docxResource Description: Column names, units and descriptions for all CSV files in this datasetResource Title: Fecal quality data. File Name: Kearney_etal2021_Patterns_of_herbivore_Data_FQ_cln.csvResource Description: Field-sampled fecal quality (CP = crude protein; DOM = digestible organic matter) data and phenology-related APAR metrics derived from 30 m daily Landsat-MODIS fusion satellite imagery. All data are paddock-scale averages and the paddock is the spatial scale of replication and week is the temporal scale of replication. Fecal samples were collected by USDA-ARS staff from 3-5 animals per paddock (10% - 25% of animals in each herd) weekly during each grazing season from 2014 to 2019 across 10 different paddocks at the Central Plains Experimental Range (CPER) near Nunn, CO. Samples were analyzed at the Grazingland Animal Nutrition Lab (GANlab, https://cnrit.tamu.edu/index.php/ganlab/) using near infrared spectroscopy (see Lyons & Stuth, 1992; Lyons, Stuth, & Angerer, 1995). Not every herd was sampled every week or every year, resulting in a total of 199 samples. Samples represent all available data at the CPER during the study period and were collected for different research and adaptive management objectives, but following the basic protocol described above. APAR metrics were derived from the paddock-scale APAR daily time series (all paddock pixels averaged daily to create a single paddock-scale time series). All APAR metrics are calculated for the week that corresponds to the week that fecal quality samples were collected in the field. See Section 2.2.4 of the corresponding manuscript for a complete description of the APAR metrics. Resource Title: Monthly ADG. File Name: Kearney_etal2021_Patterns_of_herbivore_Data_ADG_monthly_cln.csvResource Description: Monthly average daily gain (ADG) of cattle weights at the paddock scale and the three satellite-derived metrics used to build regression model to predict AD: crude protein (CP), digestible organic matter (DOM) and aboveground net herbaceous production (ANHP). Data table also includes stocking rate (animal units per hectare) used as an interaction term in the ADG regression model and all associated data to derive each of these variables (e.g., sampling start and end dates, 30 m daily Landsat-MODIS fusion satellite imagery-derived APAR metrics, cattle weights, etc.). We calculated paddock-scale average daily gain (ADG, kg hd-1 day-1) from 2000-2019 for yearlings weighed approximately every 28-days during the grazing season across 6 different paddocks with stocking densities of 0.08 – 0.27 animal units (AU) ha-1, where one AU is equivalent to a 454 kg animal. It is worth noting that AU’s change as a function of both the number of cattle within a paddock and the size of individual animals, the latter of which changes within a single grazing season. This becomes important to consider when using sub-seasonal weight data for fast-growing yearlings. For paddock-scale ADG, we first calculated ADG for each individual yearling as the difference between the weights obtained at the end and beginning of each period, divided by the number of days in each period, and then averaged for all individuals in the paddock. We excluded data from 2013 due to data collection inconsistencies. We note that most of the monthly weight data (97%) is from 3 paddocks where cattle were weighed every year, whereas in the other 3 paddocks, monthly weights were only measured during 2017-2019. Apart from the 2013 data, which were not comparable to data from other years, the data represents all available weight gain data for CPER to maximize spatial-temporal coverage and avoid potential bias from subjective decisions to subset the data. Data may have been collected for different projects at different times, but was collected in a consistent way. This resulted in 269 paddock-scale estimates of monthly ADG, with robust temporal, but limited spatial, coverage. CP and DOM were estimated from a random forest model trained from the five APAR metrics: rAPAR, dAPAR, tPeak, iAPAR and iAPAR-dry (see manuscript Section 2.3 for description). APAR metrics were derived from the paddock-scale APAR daily time series (all paddock pixels averaged daily to create a single paddock-scale time series). All APAR metrics are calculated as the average of the approximately 28-day period that corresponds to the ADG calculation. See Section 2.2.4 of the manuscript for a complete description of the APAR metrics. ANHP was estimated from a linear regression model developed by Gaffney et al. (2018) to calculate net aboveground herbaceous productivity (ANHP; kg ha-1) from iAPAR. We averaged the coefficients of 4 spatial models (2013-2016) developed by Gaffney et al. (2018), resulting in the following equation: ANHP = -26.47 + 2.07(iAPAR) We first calculated ANHP for each day of the grazing season at the paddock scale, and then took the average ANHP for the 28-day period. REFERENCES: Gaffney, R., Porensky, L. M., Gao, F., Irisarri, J. G., Durante, M., Derner, J. D., & Augustine, D. J. (2018). Using APAR to predict aboveground plant productivity in semi-aid rangelands: Spatial and temporal relationships differ. Remote Sensing, 10(9). doi: 10.3390/rs10091474 Resource Title: Season-long ADG. File Name: Kearney_etal2021_Patterns_of_herbivore_Data_ADG_seasonal_cln.csvResource Description: Season-long observed and model-predicted average daily gain (ADG) of cattle weights at the paddock scale. Also includes two variables used to analyze patterns in model residuals: percent sand content and season-long aboveground net herbaceous production (ANHP). We calculated observed paddock-scale ADG for the entire grazing season from 2010-2019 (excluding 2013 due to data collection inconsistencies) by averaging seasonal ADG of each yearling, determined as the difference between the end and starting weights divided by the number of days in the grazing season. This dataset was available for 40 paddocks spanning a range of soil types, plant communities, and topographic positions. Data may have been collected for different projects at different times, but was collected in a consistent way. We note that there was spatial overlap among a small number paddock boundaries across different years since some fence lines were moved in 2012 and 2014. Model-predicted paddock-scale ADG was derived using the monthly ADG regression model described in Sections 2.3.3 and 2.3.4. of the associated manuscript. In short, we predicted season-long cattle weight gains by first predicting daily weight gain for each day of the grazing season from the monthly regression model using a 28-day moving average of model inputs (CP, DOM and ANHP ). We calculated the final ADG for the entire grazing season as the average predicted ADG, starting 28-days into the growing season. Percent sand content was obtained as the paddock-scale average of POLARIS sand content in the upper 0-30 cm. ANHP was calculated on the last day of the grazing season fusing a linear regression model developed by Gaffney et al. (2018) to calculate net aboveground herbaceous productivity (ANHP; kg ha-1) from satellite-derived integrated absorbed photosynthetically active radiation (iAPAR) (see Section 3.1.2 of the associated manuscript). We averaged the coefficients of 4 spatial models (2013-2016) developed by Gaffney et al. (2018), resulting in the following equation: ANHP = -26.47 + 2.07(iAPAR) REFERENCES: Gaffney, R., Porensky, L. M., Gao, F., Irisarri, J. G., Durante, M., Derner, J. D., & Augustine, D. J. (2018). Using APAR to predict aboveground plant productivity in semi-aid rangelands: Spatial and temporal relationships differ. Remote Sensing, 10(9). doi: 10.3390/rs10091474

ERA5 is the fifth generation ECMWF reanalysis for the global climate and weather for the past 8 decades. Data is available from 1940 onwards. ERA5 replaces the ERA-Interim reanalysis. Reanalysis combines model data with observations from across the world into a globally complete and consistent dataset using the laws of physics. This principle, called data assimilation, is based on the method used by numerical weather prediction centres, where every so many hours (12 hours at ECMWF) a previous forecast is combined with newly available observations in an optimal way to produce a new best estimate of the state of the atmosphere, called analysis, from which an updated, improved forecast is issued. Reanalysis works in the same way, but at reduced resolution to allow for the provision of a dataset spanning back several decades. Reanalysis does not have the constraint of issuing timely forecasts, so there is more time to collect observations, and when going further back in time, to allow for the ingestion of improved versions of the original observations, which all benefit the quality of the reanalysis product. ERA5 provides hourly estimates for a large number of atmospheric, ocean-wave and land-surface quantities. An uncertainty estimate is sampled by an underlying 10-member ensemble at three-hourly intervals. Ensemble mean and spread have been pre-computed for convenience. Such uncertainty estimates are closely related to the information content of the available observing system which has evolved considerably over time. They also indicate flow-dependent sensitive areas. To facilitate many climate applications, monthly-mean averages have been pre-calculated too, though monthly means are not available for the ensemble mean and spread. ERA5 is updated daily with a latency of about 5 days. In case that serious flaws are detected in this early release (called ERA5T), this data could be different from the final release 2 to 3 months later. In case that this occurs users are notified. The data set presented here is a regridded subset of the full ERA5 data set on native resolution. It is online on spinning disk, which should ensure fast and easy access. It should satisfy the requirements for most common applications. An overview of all ERA5 datasets can be found in this article. Information on access to ERA5 data on native resolution is provided in these guidelines. Data has been regridded to a regular lat-lon grid of 0.25 degrees for the reanalysis and 0.5 degrees for the uncertainty estimate (0.5 and 1 degree respectively for ocean waves). There are four main sub sets: hourly and monthly products, both on pressure levels (upper air fields) and single levels (atmospheric, ocean-wave and land surface quantities). The present entry is "ERA5 hourly data on pressure levels from 1940 to present".

GLAH05 Level-1B waveform parameterization data include output parameters from the waveform characterization procedure and other parameters required to calculate surface slope and relief characteristics. GLAH05 contains parameterizations of both the transmitted and received pulses and other characteristics from which elevation and footprint-scale roughness and slope are calculated. The received pulse characterization uses two implementations of the retracking algorithms: one tuned for ice sheets, called the standard parameterization, used to calculate surface elevation for ice sheets, oceans, and sea ice; and another for land (the alternative parameterization). Each data granule has an associated browse product.

It is argued that univariate long memory estimates based on ex post data tend to underestimate the persistence of ex ante variables (and, hence, that of the ex post variables themselves) because of the presence of unanticipated shocks whose short-run volatility masks the degree of long-range dependence in the data. Empirical estimates of long-range dependence in the Fisher equation are shown to manifest this problem and lead to an apparent imbalance in the memory characteristics of the variables in the Fisher equation. Evidence in support of this typical underestimation is provided by results obtained with inflation forecast survey data and by direct calculation of the finite sample biases. To address the problem of bias, the paper introduces a bivariate exact Whittle (BEW) estimator that explicitly allows for the presence of short memory noise in the data. The new procedure enhances the empirical capacity to separate low-frequency behaviour from high-frequency fluctuations, and it produces estimates of long-range dependence that are much less biased when there is noise contaminated data. Empirical estimates from the BEW method suggest that the three Fisher variables are integrated of the same order, with memory parameter in the range (0.75, 1). Since the integration orders are balanced, the ex ante real rate has the same degree of persistence as expected inflation, thereby furnishing evidence against the existence of a (fractional) cointegrating relation among the Fisher variables and, correspondingly, showing little support for a long-run form of Fisher hypothesis.