This data table provides the detailed data quality assessment scores for the Single Digital View dataset. The quality assessment was carried out on the 31st of March. At SPEN, we are dedicated to sharing high-quality data with our stakeholders and being transparent about its' quality. This is why we openly share the results of our data quality assessments. We collaborate closely with Data Owners to address any identified issues and enhance our overall data quality. To demonstrate our progress we conduct, at a minimum, bi-annual assessments of our data quality - for datasets that are refreshed more frequently than this, please note that the quality assessment may be based on an earlier version of the dataset. To learn more about our approach to how we assess data quality, visit Data Quality - SP Energy Networks.We welcome feedback and questions from our stakeholders regarding this process. Our Open Data Team is available to answer any enquiries or receive feedback on the assessments. You can contact them via our Open Data mailbox at opendata@spenergynetworks.co.uk.The first phase of our comprehensive data quality assessment measures the quality of our datasets across three dimensions. Please refer to the data table schema for the definitions of these dimensions. We are now in the process of expanding our quality assessments to include additional dimensions to provide a more comprehensive evaluation and will update the data tables with the results when available.DisclaimerThe data quality assessment may not represent the quality of the current dataset that is published on the Open Data Portal. Please check the date of the latest quality assessment and compare to the 'Modified' date of the corresponding dataset. The data quality assessments will be updated on either a quarterly or annual basis, dependent on the update frequency of the dataset. This information can be found in the dataset metadata, within the Information tab. If you require a more up to date quality assessment, please contact the Open Data Team at opendata@spenergynetworks.co.uk and a member of the team will be in contact.

The Cloud Data Quality Monitoring and Testing market is poised for robust expansion, projected to reach an estimated market size of USD 15,000 million in 2025, with a remarkable Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 18% expected from 2025 to 2033. This significant growth is fueled by the escalating volume of data generated by organizations and the increasing adoption of cloud-based solutions for data management. Businesses are recognizing that reliable data is paramount for informed decision-making, regulatory compliance, and driving competitive advantage. As more critical business processes migrate to the cloud, the imperative to ensure the accuracy, completeness, consistency, and validity of this data becomes a top priority. Consequently, investments in sophisticated monitoring and testing tools are surging, enabling organizations to proactively identify and rectify data quality issues before they impact operations or strategic initiatives. Key drivers propelling this market forward include the growing demand for real-time data analytics, the complexities introduced by multi-cloud and hybrid cloud environments, and the increasing stringency of data privacy regulations. Cloud Data Quality Monitoring and Testing solutions offer enterprises the agility and scalability required to manage vast datasets effectively. The market is segmented by deployment into On-Premises and Cloud-Based solutions, with a clear shift towards cloud-native approaches due to their inherent flexibility and cost-effectiveness. Furthermore, the adoption of these solutions is observed across both Large Enterprises and Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs), indicating a broad market appeal. Emerging trends such as AI-powered data quality anomaly detection and automated data profiling are further enhancing the capabilities of these platforms, promising to streamline data governance and boost overall data trustworthiness. However, challenges such as the initial cost of implementation and a potential shortage of skilled data quality professionals may temper the growth trajectory in certain segments. Here's a comprehensive report description for Cloud Data Quality Monitoring and Testing, incorporating your specified elements:

The Cloud Data Quality Monitoring and Testing market is experiencing robust growth, driven by the increasing reliance on cloud-based data storage and processing, the burgeoning volume of big data, and the stringent regulatory compliance requirements across various industries. The market's expansion is fueled by the need for real-time data quality assurance, proactive identification of data anomalies, and improved data governance. Businesses are increasingly adopting cloud-based solutions to enhance operational efficiency, reduce infrastructure costs, and improve scalability. This shift is particularly evident in large enterprises, which are investing heavily in advanced data quality management tools to support their complex data landscapes. The growth of SMEs adopting cloud-based solutions also contributes significantly to market expansion. While on-premises solutions still hold a market share, the cloud-based segment is demonstrating a significantly higher growth rate, projected to dominate the market within the forecast period (2025-2033). Despite the positive market outlook, certain challenges hinder growth. These include concerns regarding data security and privacy in cloud environments, the complexity of integrating data quality tools with existing IT infrastructure, and the lack of skilled professionals proficient in cloud data quality management. However, advancements in AI and machine learning are mitigating these challenges, enabling automated data quality checks and anomaly detection, thus streamlining the process and reducing the reliance on manual intervention. The market is segmented geographically, with North America and Europe currently holding significant market shares due to early adoption of cloud technologies and robust regulatory frameworks. However, the Asia Pacific region is projected to experience substantial growth in the coming years due to increasing digitalization and expanding cloud infrastructure investments. This competitive landscape with established players and emerging innovative companies is further shaping the market's evolution and expansion.

Dataset

This dataset was created by shamiul islam shifat

Contents

This data table provides the detailed data quality assessment scores for the Curtailment dataset. The quality assessment was carried out on the 31st of March. At SPEN, we are dedicated to sharing high-quality data with our stakeholders and being transparent about its' quality. This is why we openly share the results of our data quality assessments. We collaborate closely with Data Owners to address any identified issues and enhance our overall data quality. To demonstrate our progress we conduct, at a minimum, bi-annual assessments of our data quality - for datasets that are refreshed more frequently than this, please note that the quality assessment may be based on an earlier version of the dataset. To learn more about our approach to how we assess data quality, visit Data Quality - SP Energy Networks.We welcome feedback and questions from our stakeholders regarding this process. Our Open Data Team is available to answer any enquiries or receive feedback on the assessments. You can contact them via our Open Data mailbox at opendata@spenergynetworks.co.uk.The first phase of our comprehensive data quality assessment measures the quality of our datasets across three dimensions. Please refer to the data table schema for the definitions of these dimensions. We are now in the process of expanding our quality assessments to include additional dimensions to provide a more comprehensive evaluation and will update the data tables with the results when available.DisclaimerThe data quality assessment may not represent the quality of the current dataset that is published on the Open Data Portal. Please check the date of the latest quality assessment and compare to the 'Modified' date of the corresponding dataset. The data quality assessments will be updated on either a quarterly or annual basis, dependent on the update frequency of the dataset. This information can be found in the dataset metadata, within the Information tab. If you require a more up to date quality assessment, please contact the Open Data Team at opendata@spenergynetworks.co.uk and a member of the team will be in contact.

Test data for the WMT17 QE task. Train data can be downloaded from http://hdl.handle.net/11372/LRT-1974

This shared task will build on its previous five editions to further examine automatic methods for estimating the quality of machine translation output at run-time, without relying on reference translations. We include word-level, phrase-level and sentence-level estimation. All tasks will make use of a large dataset produced from post-editions by professional translators. The data will be domain-specific (IT and Pharmaceutical domains) and substantially larger than in previous years. In addition to advancing the state of the art at all prediction levels, our goals include:

- To test the effectiveness of larger (domain-specific and professionally annotated) datasets. We will do so by increasing the size of one of last year's training sets.

- To study the effect of language direction and domain. We will do so by providing two datasets created in similar ways, but for different domains and language directions.

- To investigate the utility of detailed information logged during post-editing. We will do so by providing post-editing time, keystrokes, and actual edits.

This year's shared task provides new training and test datasets for all tasks, and allows participants to explore any additional data and resources deemed relevant. A in-house MT system was used to produce translations for all tasks. MT system-dependent information can be made available under request. The data is publicly available but since it has been provided by our industry partners it is subject to specific terms and conditions. However, these have no practical implications on the use of this data for research purposes.

This data table provides the detailed data quality assessment scores for the Long Term Development Statement dataset. The quality assessment was carried out on 31st March. At SPEN, we are dedicated to sharing high-quality data with our stakeholders and being transparent about its' quality. This is why we openly share the results of our data quality assessments. We collaborate closely with Data Owners to address any identified issues and enhance our overall data quality; to demonstrate our progress we conduct annual assessments of our data quality in line with the dataset refresh rate. To learn more about our approach to how we assess data quality, visit Data Quality - SP Energy Networks.We welcome feedback and questions from our stakeholders regarding this process. Our Open Data Team is available to answer any enquiries or receive feedback on the assessments. You can contact them via our Open Data mailbox at opendata@spenergynetworks.co.uk.The first phase of our comprehensive data quality assessment measures the quality of our datasets across three dimensions. Please refer to the data table schema for the definitions of these dimensions. We are now in the process of expanding our quality assessments to include additional dimensions to provide a more comprehensive evaluation and will update the data tables with the results when available.DisclaimerThe data quality assessment may not represent the quality of the current dataset that is published on the Open Data Portal. Please check the date of the latest quality assessment and compare to the 'Modified' date of the corresponding dataset. The data quality assessments will be updated on either a quarterly or annual basis, dependent on the update frequency of the dataset. This information can be found in the dataset metadata, within the Information tab. If you require a more up to date quality assessment, please contact the Open Data Team at opendata@spenergynetworks.co.uk and a member of the team will be in contact.

Snapshot img

Test Data Management Market Size 2025-2029

The test data management market size is forecast to increase by USD 727.3 million, at a CAGR of 10.5% between 2024 and 2029.

The market is experiencing significant growth, driven by the increasing adoption of automation by enterprises to streamline their testing processes. The automation trend is fueled by the growing consumer spending on technological solutions, as businesses seek to improve efficiency and reduce costs. However, the market faces challenges, including the lack of awareness and standardization in test data management practices. This obstacle hinders the effective implementation of test data management solutions, requiring companies to invest in education and training to ensure successful integration. To capitalize on market opportunities and navigate challenges effectively, businesses must stay informed about emerging trends and best practices in test data management. By doing so, they can optimize their testing processes, reduce risks, and enhance overall quality.

What will be the Size of the Test Data Management Market during the forecast period?

Explore in-depth regional segment analysis with market size data - historical 2019-2023 and forecasts 2025-2029 - in the full report.
Request Free SampleThe market continues to evolve, driven by the ever-increasing volume and complexity of data. Data exploration and analysis are at the forefront of this dynamic landscape, with data ethics and governance frameworks ensuring data transparency and integrity. Data masking, cleansing, and validation are crucial components of data management, enabling data warehousing, orchestration, and pipeline development. Data security and privacy remain paramount, with encryption, access control, and anonymization key strategies. Data governance, lineage, and cataloging facilitate data management software automation and reporting. Hybrid data management solutions, including artificial intelligence and machine learning, are transforming data insights and analytics. Data regulations and compliance are shaping the market, driving the need for data accountability and stewardship. Data visualization, mining, and reporting provide valuable insights, while data quality management, archiving, and backup ensure data availability and recovery. Data modeling, data integrity, and data transformation are essential for data warehousing and data lake implementations. Data management platforms are seamlessly integrated into these evolving patterns, enabling organizations to effectively manage their data assets and gain valuable insights. Data management services, cloud and on-premise, are essential for organizations to adapt to the continuous changes in the market and effectively leverage their data resources.

How is this Test Data Management Industry segmented?

The test data management industry research report provides comprehensive data (region-wise segment analysis), with forecasts and estimates in 'USD million' for the period 2025-2029, as well as historical data from 2019-2023 for the following segments. ApplicationOn-premisesCloud-basedComponentSolutionsServicesEnd-userInformation technologyTelecomBFSIHealthcare and life sciencesOthersSectorLarge enterpriseSMEsGeographyNorth AmericaUSCanadaEuropeFranceGermanyItalyUKAPACAustraliaChinaIndiaJapanRest of World (ROW).

By Application Insights

The on-premises segment is estimated to witness significant growth during the forecast period.In the realm of data management, on-premises testing represents a popular approach for businesses seeking control over their infrastructure and testing process. This approach involves establishing testing facilities within an office or data center, necessitating a dedicated team with the necessary skills. The benefits of on-premises testing extend beyond control, as it enables organizations to upgrade and configure hardware and software at their discretion, providing opportunities for exploration testing. Furthermore, data security is a significant concern for many businesses, and on-premises testing alleviates the risk of compromising sensitive information to third-party companies. Data exploration, a crucial aspect of data analysis, can be carried out more effectively with on-premises testing, ensuring data integrity and security. Data masking, cleansing, and validation are essential data preparation techniques that can be executed efficiently in an on-premises environment. Data warehousing, data pipelines, and data orchestration are integral components of data management, and on-premises testing allows for seamless integration and management of these elements. Data governance frameworks, lineage, catalogs, and metadata are essential for maintaining data transparency and compliance. Data security, encryption, and access control are paramount, and on-premises testing offers greater control over these aspects. Data reporting, visualization, and insigh

Discover the booming Test Data Generation Tools market! Our comprehensive analysis reveals key trends, growth drivers, and leading companies shaping this dynamic sector. Learn about market size, CAGR, and regional insights for 2025-2033. Improve your software testing efficiency today!

Test data for the WMT18 QE task. Train data can be downloaded from http://hdl.handle.net/11372/LRT-2619.

This shared task will build on its previous six editions to further examine automatic methods for estimating the quality of machine translation output at run-time, without relying on reference translations. We include word-level, phrase-level and sentence-level estimation. All tasks make use of datasets produced from post-editions by professional translators. The datasets are domain-specific (IT and life sciences/pharma domains) and extend from those used previous years with more instances and more languages. One important addition is that this year we also include datasets with neural MT outputs. In addition to advancing the state of the art at all prediction levels, our specific goals are:

To study the performance of quality estimation approaches on the output of neural MT systems. We will do so by providing datasets for two language language pairs where the same source segments are translated by both a statistical phrase-based and a neural MT system.

To study the predictability of deleted words, i.e. words that are missing in the MT output. TO do so, for the first time we provide data annotated for such errors at training time.

To study the effectiveness of explicitly assigned labels for phrases. We will do so by providing a dataset where each phrase in the output of a phrase-based statistical MT system was annotated by human translators.

To study the effect of different language pairs. We will do so by providing datasets created in similar ways for four language language pairs.

To investigate the utility of detailed information logged during post-editing. We will do so by providing post-editing time, keystrokes, and actual edits.

Measure progress over years at all prediction levels. We will do so by using last year's test set for comparative experiments.

In-house statistical and neural MT systems were built to produce translations for all tasks. MT system-dependent information can be made available under request. The data is publicly available but since it has been provided by our industry partners it is subject to specific terms and conditions. However, these have no practical implications on the use of this data for research purposes. Participants are allowed to explore any additional data and resources deemed relevant.

Ontario has a comprehensive set of measures and regulations to help ensure the safety of drinking water.

The following dataset contains information about the drinking water systems, laboratories and facilities the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks is responsible for monitoring to ensure compliance with Ontario's drinking water laws.

The dataset includes information about:

• the number and type of registered systems and laboratories
• drinking water quality test results
• adverse water quality incidents
• activities to support reduced lead in drinking water
• enforcement activities related to inspections
• orders and convictions
• system operator certification

This dataset is designed to support research and development in automated test report generation and quality assessment within engineering domains. It contains 2,454 test report records, each simulating the output of system-level testing across components like sensor modules, brake systems, and control boards.

Each entry includes technical attributes such as execution time, defect severity, test environment, and report length, as well as qualitative scores like clarity, conciseness, and tester confidence. The goal is to provide a comprehensive set of features that represent both objective system metrics and subjective report quality.

A key label, Is_High_Impact_Report, indicates whether a report holds high value in terms of diagnostic importance, based on a combination of severity, clarity, and label quality.

Test Report Generation Applied specifically to engineering systems — such as software engineering, embedded systems, hardware validation, or automated quality assurance in engineering workflows.

🔍 Key Features Feature Name Description Test_Report_ID Unique ID for each report Component Engineering subsystem tested (e.g., Sensor Module, Engine Unit) Test_Case_ID Identifier of the executed test case Execution_Time(s) Time taken to complete the test Defect_Detected Indicates if a defect was found Defect_Severity Severity of detected defect: Low, Medium, High, Critical, or None Defect_Variability Recurrence score of the defect across tests (0.0–1.0) Log_Length Number of lines in the report log Report_Clarity_Score Clarity score of the report text (0.0–1.0) Report_Conciseness_Score Conciseness rating of the report (0.0–1.0) Tester_Confidence_Level Confidence level of the person executing the test (1–5) Test_Environment Environment where the test occurred: Simulation, Lab, or Field Auto_Label_Quality Expert quality rating for the report (1–10) Timestamp Date and time when the test was conducted Is_High_Impact_Report Target label indicating whether the report is considered impactful

✅ Use Cases Enhancing test documentation processes

Analyzing defect characteristics and report relevance

Supporting quality assurance workflows

Building datasets for exploratory or statistical analysis in engineering testing.

This archive provides additional data for the article "Understanding Test Convention Consistency

as a Dimension of Test Quality" by Martin P. Robillard, Mathieu Nassif, and Muhammad Sohail,

published in ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology.

Jointly managed by multiple states and the federal government, there are many ongoing efforts to characterize and understand water quality in the Delaware River Basin (DRB). Many State, Federal and non-profit organizations have collected surface-water-quality samples across the DRB for decades and many of these data are available through the National Water Quality Monitoring Council's Water Quality Portal (WQP). In this data release, WQP data in the DRB were harmonized, meaning that they were processed to create a clean and readily usable dataset. This harmonization processing included the synthesis of parameter names and fractions, the condensation of remarks and other data qualifiers, the resolution of duplicate records, an initial quality control check of the data, and other processing steps described in the metadata. This data set provides harmonized discrete multisource surface-water-quality data pulled from the WQP for nutrients, sediment, salinity, major ions, bacteria, temperature, dissolved oxygen, pH, and turbidity in the DRB, for all available years.

Data Quality Education Training Test Data Set Description

One-second NO2 data were collected via routine mobile monitoring in Oakland, California as part of an on-going multiinstitutional collaboration between the Environmental Defense Fund, University of Texas at Austin, and Google, among others. Details of the sampling protocol are available in Apte et al. Citation information for this dataset can be found in the EDG's Metadata Reference Information section and Data.gov's References section.

Explore the dynamic Big Data Testing market forecast, analyzing key drivers, trends, and industry segments. Discover growth opportunities and challenges for Big Data Testing solutions.

The Data Warehouse Testing market is booming, projected to reach $2.5B in 2025 with a 15% CAGR through 2033. Learn about key drivers, trends, and regional insights in this comprehensive market analysis, covering major players and segments like cloud-based and on-premise solutions.

The Test Data Generation Tools market is poised for significant expansion, projected to reach an estimated USD 1.5 billion in 2025 and exhibit a robust Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of approximately 15% through 2033. This growth is primarily fueled by the escalating complexity of software applications, the increasing demand for agile development methodologies, and the critical need for comprehensive and realistic test data to ensure application quality and performance. Enterprises across all sizes, from large corporations to Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs), are recognizing the indispensable role of effective test data management in mitigating risks, accelerating time-to-market, and enhancing user experience. The drive for cost optimization and regulatory compliance further propels the adoption of advanced test data generation solutions, as manual data creation is often time-consuming, error-prone, and unsustainable in today's fast-paced development cycles. The market is witnessing a paradigm shift towards intelligent and automated data generation, moving beyond basic random or pathwise techniques to more sophisticated goal-oriented and AI-driven approaches that can generate highly relevant and production-like data. The market landscape is characterized by a dynamic interplay of established technology giants and specialized players, all vying for market share by offering innovative features and tailored solutions. Prominent companies like IBM, Informatica, Microsoft, and Broadcom are leveraging their extensive portfolios and cloud infrastructure to provide integrated data management and testing solutions. Simultaneously, specialized vendors such as DATPROF, Delphix Corporation, and Solix Technologies are carving out niches by focusing on advanced synthetic data generation, data masking, and data subsetting capabilities. The evolution of cloud-native architectures and microservices has created a new set of challenges and opportunities, with a growing emphasis on generating diverse and high-volume test data for distributed systems. Asia Pacific, particularly China and India, is emerging as a significant growth region due to the burgeoning IT sector and increasing investments in digital transformation initiatives. North America and Europe continue to be mature markets, driven by strong R&D investments and a high level of digital adoption. The market's trajectory indicates a sustained upward trend, driven by the continuous pursuit of software excellence and the critical need for robust testing strategies. This report provides an in-depth analysis of the global Test Data Generation Tools market, examining its evolution, current landscape, and future trajectory from 2019 to 2033. The Base Year for analysis is 2025, with the Estimated Year also being 2025, and the Forecast Period extending from 2025 to 2033. The Historical Period covered is 2019-2024. We delve into the critical aspects of this rapidly growing industry, offering insights into market dynamics, key players, emerging trends, and growth opportunities. The market is projected to witness substantial growth, with an estimated value reaching several million by the end of the forecast period.