Facebook
Twitterhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
This synthetic dataset contains 4,362 rows and five columns, including both numerical and categorical data. It is designed for data cleaning, imputation, and analysis tasks, featuring structured missing values at varying percentages (63%, 4%, 47%, 31%, and 9%).
The dataset includes:
- Category (Categorical): Product category (A, B, C, D)
- Price (Numerical): Randomized product prices
- Rating (Numerical): Ratings between 1 to 5
- Stock (Categorical): Availability status (In Stock, Out of Stock)
- Discount (Numerical): Discount percentage
This dataset is ideal for practicing missing data handling, exploratory data analysis (EDA), and machine learning preprocessing.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
The monitoring of surface-water quality followed by water-quality modeling and analysis is essential for generating effective strategies in water resource management. However, water-quality studies are limited by the lack of complete and reliable data sets on surface-water-quality variables. These deficiencies are particularly noticeable in developing countries.
This work focuses on surface-water-quality data from Santa Lucía Chico river (Uruguay), a mixed lotic and lentic river system. Data collected at six monitoring stations are publicly available at https://www.dinama.gub.uy/oan/datos-abiertos/calidad-agua/. The high temporal and spatial variability that characterizes water-quality variables and the high rate of missing values (between 50% and 70%) raises significant challenges.
To deal with missing values, we applied several statistical and machine-learning imputation methods. The competing algorithms implemented belonged to both univariate and multivariate imputation methods (inverse distance weighting (IDW), Random Forest Regressor (RFR), Ridge (R), Bayesian Ridge (BR), AdaBoost (AB), Huber Regressor (HR), Support Vector Regressor (SVR), and K-nearest neighbors Regressor (KNNR)).
IDW outperformed the others, achieving a very good performance (NSE greater than 0.8) in most cases.
In this dataset, we include the original and imputed values for the following variables:
Water temperature (Tw)
Dissolved oxygen (DO)
Electrical conductivity (EC)
pH
Turbidity (Turb)
Nitrite (NO2-)
Nitrate (NO3-)
Total Nitrogen (TN)
Each variable is identified as [STATION] VARIABLE FULL NAME (VARIABLE SHORT NAME) [UNIT METRIC].
More details about the study area, the original datasets, and the methodology adopted can be found in our paper https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/11/6318.
If you use this dataset in your work, please cite our paper:
Rodríguez, R.; Pastorini, M.; Etcheverry, L.; Chreties, C.; Fossati, M.; Castro, A.; Gorgoglione, A. Water-Quality Data Imputation with a High Percentage of Missing Values: A Machine Learning Approach. Sustainability 2021, 13, 6318. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116318
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Missing data is an inevitable aspect of every empirical research. Researchers developed several techniques to handle missing data to avoid information loss and biases. Over the past 50 years, these methods have become more and more efficient and also more complex. Building on previous review studies, this paper aims to analyze what kind of missing data handling methods are used among various scientific disciplines. For the analysis, we used nearly 50.000 scientific articles that were published between 1999 and 2016. JSTOR provided the data in text format. Furthermore, we utilized a text-mining approach to extract the necessary information from our corpus. Our results show that the usage of advanced missing data handling methods such as Multiple Imputation or Full Information Maximum Likelihood estimation is steadily growing in the examination period. Additionally, simpler methods, like listwise and pairwise deletion, are still in widespread use.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Missing data is a common problem in many research fields and is a challenge that always needs careful considerations. One approach is to impute the missing values, i.e., replace missing values with estimates. When imputation is applied, it is typically applied to all records with missing values indiscriminately. We note that the effects of imputation can be strongly dependent on what is missing. To help make decisions about which records should be imputed, we propose to use a machine learning approach to estimate the imputation error for each case with missing data. The method is thought to be a practical approach to help users using imputation after the informed choice to impute the missing data has been made. To do this all patterns of missing values are simulated in all complete cases, enabling calculation of the “true error” in each of these new cases. The error is then estimated for each case with missing values by weighing the “true errors” by similarity. The method can also be used to test the performance of different imputation methods. A universal numerical threshold of acceptable error cannot be set since this will differ according to the data, research question, and analysis method. The effect of threshold can be estimated using the complete cases. The user can set an a priori relevant threshold for what is acceptable or use cross validation with the final analysis to choose the threshold. The choice can be presented along with argumentation for the choice rather than holding to conventions that might not be warranted in the specific dataset.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Example data sets and computer code for the book chapter titled "Missing Data in the Analysis of Multilevel and Dependent Data" submitted for publication in the second edition of "Dependent Data in Social Science Research" (Stemmler et al., 2015). This repository includes the computer code (".R") and the data sets from both example analyses (Examples 1 and 2). The data sets are available in two file formats (binary ".rda" for use in R; plain-text ".dat").
The data sets contain simulated data from 23,376 (Example 1) and 23,072 (Example 2) individuals from 2,000 groups on four variables:
ID = group identifier (1-2000) x = numeric (Level 1) y = numeric (Level 1) w = binary (Level 2)
In all data sets, missing values are coded as "NA".
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Abstract During analysis of scientific research data, it is customary to encounter anomalous values or missing data. Anomalous values can be the result of errors of recording, typing, measurement by instruments, or may be true outliers. This review discusses concepts, examples and methods for identifying and dealing with such contingencies. In the case of missing data, techniques for imputation of the values are discussed in, order to avoid exclusion of the research subject, if it is not possible to retrieve information from registration forms or to re-address the participant.
Facebook
TwitterThis dataset was created by Deep Jani
Released under Data files © Original Authors
Facebook
TwitterDataset is final solution for dealing with missing values in the Spaceship Titanic competition. Kaggle Notebook: https://www.kaggle.com/sardorabdirayimov/best-way-of-dealing-with-missing-values-titanic-2/
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
When dealing with missing data in clinical trials, it is often convenient to work under simplifying assumptions, such as missing at random (MAR), and follow up with sensitivity analyses to address unverifiable missing data assumptions. One such sensitivity analysis, routinely requested by regulatory agencies, is the so-called tipping point analysis, in which the treatment effect is re-evaluated after adding a successively more extreme shift parameter to the predicted values among subjects with missing data. If the shift parameter needed to overturn the conclusion is so extreme that it is considered clinically implausible, then this indicates robustness to missing data assumptions. Tipping point analyses are frequently used in the context of continuous outcome data under multiple imputation. While simple to implement, computation can be cumbersome in the two-way setting where both comparator and active arms are shifted, essentially requiring the evaluation of a two-dimensional grid of models. We describe a computationally efficient approach to performing two-way tipping point analysis in the setting of continuous outcome data with multiple imputation. We show how geometric properties can lead to further simplification when exploring the impact of missing data. Lastly, we propose a novel extension to a multi-way setting which yields simple and general sufficient conditions for robustness to missing data assumptions.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 (CC BY-NC 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Missing values are a notable challenge when analyzing mass spectrometry-based proteomics data. While the field is still actively debating the best practices, the challenge increased with the emergence of mass spectrometry-based single-cell proteomics and the dramatic increase in missing values. A popular approach to deal with missing values is to perform imputation. Imputation has several drawbacks for which alternatives exist, but currently, imputation is still a practical solution widely adopted in single-cell proteomics data analysis. This perspective discusses the advantages and drawbacks of imputation. We also highlight 5 main challenges linked to missing value management in single-cell proteomics. Future developments should aim to solve these challenges, whether it is through imputation or data modeling. The perspective concludes with recommendations for reporting missing values, for reporting methods that deal with missing values, and for proper encoding of missing values.
Facebook
TwitterMissing values in proteomic data sets have real consequences on downstream data analysis and reproducibility. Although several imputation methods exist to handle missing values, no single imputation method is best suited for a diverse range of data sets, and no clear strategy exists for evaluating imputation methods for clinical DIA-MS data sets, especially at different levels of protein quantification. To navigate through the different imputation strategies available in the literature, we have established a strategy to assess imputation methods on clinical label-free DIA-MS data sets. We used three DIA-MS data sets with real missing values to evaluate eight imputation methods with multiple parameters at different levels of protein quantification: a dilution series data set, a small pilot data set, and a clinical proteomic data set comparing paired tumor and stroma tissue. We found that imputation methods based on local structures within the data, like local least-squares (LLS) and random forest (RF), worked well in our dilution series data set, whereas imputation methods based on global structures within the data, like BPCA, performed well in the other two data sets. We also found that imputation at the most basic protein quantification levelfragment levelimproved accuracy and the number of proteins quantified. With this analytical framework, we quickly and cost-effectively evaluated different imputation methods using two smaller complementary data sets to narrow down to the larger proteomic data set’s most accurate methods. This acquisition strategy allowed us to provide reproducible evidence of the accuracy of the imputation method, even in the absence of a ground truth. Overall, this study indicates that the most suitable imputation method relies on the overall structure of the data set and provides an example of an analytic framework that may assist in identifying the most appropriate imputation strategies for the differential analysis of proteins.
Facebook
TwitterThis datasets about Netflix Movies & TV Shows. Datasets have 12 columns with some null values. To analysis of dataset are used Pandas, plotly.express and Datetime libraries. Analysis process I divided into several parts for step wise analysis and to find out trending questions on social media for Bollywood actors and actress.
There are many representations of missing data. They are Null values, missing values. I used some of methods used in data analysis process to clean missing values.
There I used some string method on column such as 'cast', 'Lested_in' to extract data
Converting an object type into datatype objects with the to_datetime function then we have a datatime object, can extract various part of data such as year, month and day
Here, I find out several eye catching question. the following questions are like as- - Show the all Movies & TV Shows released by month - Count the all types of unique rating & which rating are with most number - Salman, Shah Rukh and Akshay Kumar all movie - Find out the Movies & Series have Maximum time length - Year on Year show added on Netflix by its type - Akshay Kumar all comedies movies, Shah Rukh movies with Kajol and Salman-Akshay Movies - Who Director has made the most TV Shows - Actors and Actress who have given most Number of Movies - Find out which types of genre has most movies and TV Shows
Facebook
TwitterFossil-based estimates of diversity and evolutionary dynamics mainly rely on the study of morphological variation. Unfortunately, organism remains are often altered by post-mortem taphonomic processes such as weathering or distortion. Such a loss of information often prevents quantitative multivariate description and statistically controlled comparisons of extinct species based on morphometric data. A common way to deal with missing data involves imputation methods that directly fill the missing cases with model estimates. Over the last several years, several empirically determined thresholds for the maximum acceptable proportion of missing values have been proposed in the literature, whereas other studies showed that this limit actually depends on several properties of the study dataset and of the selected imputation method, and is by no way generalizable. We evaluate the relative performances of seven multiple imputation techniques through a simulation-based analysis under three distinct patterns of missing data distribution. Overall, Fully Conditional Specification and Expectation-Maximization algorithms provide the best compromises between imputation accuracy and coverage probability. Multiple imputation (MI) techniques appear remarkably robust to the violation of basic assumptions such as the occurrence of taxonomically or anatomically biased patterns of missing data distribution, making differences in simulation results between the three patterns of missing data distribution much smaller than differences between the individual MI techniques. Based on these results, rather than proposing a new (set of) threshold value(s), we develop an approach combining the use of multiple imputations with procrustean superimposition of principal component analysis results, in order to directly visualize the effect of individual missing data imputation on an ordinated space. We provide an R function for users to implement the proposed procedure.
Facebook
TwitterThe integration of proteomic datasets, generated by non-cooperating laboratories using different LC-MS/MS setups can overcome limitations in statistically underpowered sample cohorts but has not been demonstrated to this day. In proteomics, differences in sample preservation and preparation strategies, chromatography and mass spectrometry approaches and the used quantification strategy distort protein abundance distributions in integrated datasets. The Removal of these technical batch effects requires setup-specific normalization and strategies that can deal with missing at random (MAR) and missing not at random (MNAR) type values at a time. Algorithms for batch effect removal, such as the ComBat-algorithm, commonly used for other omics types, disregard proteins with MNAR missing values and reduce the informational yield and the effect size for combined datasets significantly. Here, we present a strategy for data harmonization across different tissue preservation techniques, LC-MS/MS instrumentation setups and quantification approaches. To enable batch effect removal without the need for data reduction or error-prone imputation we developed an extension to the ComBat algorithm, ´ComBat HarmonizR, that performs data harmonization with appropriate handling of MAR and MNAR missing values by matrix dissection The ComBat HarmonizR based strategy enables the combined analysis of independently generated proteomic datasets for the first time. Furthermore, we found ComBat HarmonizR to be superior for removing batch effects between different Tandem Mass Tag (TMT)-plexes, compared to commonly used internal reference scaling (iRS). Due to the matrix dissection approach without the need of data imputation, the HarmonizR algorithm can be applied to any type of -omics data while assuring minimal data loss
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
GENERAL INFORMATION
Title of Dataset: A dataset from a survey investigating disciplinary differences in data citation
Date of data collection: January to March 2022
Collection instrument: SurveyMonkey
Funding: Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
SHARING/ACCESS INFORMATION
Licenses/restrictions placed on the data: These data are available under a CC BY 4.0 license
Links to publications that cite or use the data:
Gregory, K., Ninkov, A., Ripp, C., Peters, I., & Haustein, S. (2022). Surveying practices of data citation and reuse across disciplines. Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators. International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators, Granada, Spain. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.6951437
Gregory, K., Ninkov, A., Ripp, C., Roblin, E., Peters, I., & Haustein, S. (2023). Tracing data:
A survey investigating disciplinary differences in data citation. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7555266
DATA & FILE OVERVIEW
File List
Additional related data collected that was not included in the current data package: Open ended questions asked to respondents
METHODOLOGICAL INFORMATION
Description of methods used for collection/generation of data:
The development of the questionnaire (Gregory et al., 2022) was centered around the creation of two main branches of questions for the primary groups of interest in our study: researchers that reuse data (33 questions in total) and researchers that do not reuse data (16 questions in total). The population of interest for this survey consists of researchers from all disciplines and countries, sampled from the corresponding authors of papers indexed in the Web of Science (WoS) between 2016 and 2020.
Received 3,632 responses, 2,509 of which were completed, representing a completion rate of 68.6%. Incomplete responses were excluded from the dataset. The final total contains 2,492 complete responses and an uncorrected response rate of 1.57%. Controlling for invalid emails, bounced emails and opt-outs (n=5,201) produced a response rate of 1.62%, similar to surveys using comparable recruitment methods (Gregory et al., 2020).
Methods for processing the data:
Results were downloaded from SurveyMonkey in CSV format and were prepared for analysis using Excel and SPSS by recoding ordinal and multiple choice questions and by removing missing values.
Instrument- or software-specific information needed to interpret the data:
The dataset is provided in SPSS format, which requires IBM SPSS Statistics. The dataset is also available in a coded format in CSV. The Codebook is required to interpret to values.
DATA-SPECIFIC INFORMATION FOR: MDCDataCitationReuse2021surveydata
Number of variables: 94
Number of cases/rows: 2,492
Missing data codes: 999 Not asked
Refer to MDCDatacitationReuse2021Codebook.pdf for detailed variable information.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Multivariate data are typically represented by a rectangular matrix (table) in which the rows are the objects (cases) and the columns are the variables (measurements). When there are many variables one often reduces the dimension by principal component analysis (PCA), which in its basic form is not robust to outliers. Much research has focused on handling rowwise outliers, that is, rows that deviate from the majority of the rows in the data (e.g., they might belong to a different population). In recent years also cellwise outliers are receiving attention. These are suspicious cells (entries) that can occur anywhere in the table. Even a relatively small proportion of outlying cells can contaminate over half the rows, which causes rowwise robust methods to break down. In this article, a new PCA method is constructed which combines the strengths of two existing robust methods to be robust against both cellwise and rowwise outliers. At the same time, the algorithm can cope with missing values. As of yet it is the only PCA method that can deal with all three problems simultaneously. Its name MacroPCA stands for PCA allowing for Missingness And Cellwise & Rowwise Outliers. Several simulations and real datasets illustrate its robustness. New residual maps are introduced, which help to determine which variables are responsible for the outlying behavior. The method is well-suited for online process control.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-SA 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
The Dirty Cafe Sales dataset contains 10,000 rows of synthetic data representing sales transactions in a cafe. This dataset is intentionally "dirty," with missing values, inconsistent data, and errors introduced to provide a realistic scenario for data cleaning and exploratory data analysis (EDA). It can be used to practice cleaning techniques, data wrangling, and feature engineering.
dirty_cafe_sales.csv| Column Name | Description | Example Values |
|---|---|---|
Transaction ID | A unique identifier for each transaction. Always present and unique. | TXN_1234567 |
Item | The name of the item purchased. May contain missing or invalid values (e.g., "ERROR"). | Coffee, Sandwich |
Quantity | The quantity of the item purchased. May contain missing or invalid values. | 1, 3, UNKNOWN |
Price Per Unit | The price of a single unit of the item. May contain missing or invalid values. | 2.00, 4.00 |
Total Spent | The total amount spent on the transaction. Calculated as Quantity * Price Per Unit. | 8.00, 12.00 |
Payment Method | The method of payment used. May contain missing or invalid values (e.g., None, "UNKNOWN"). | Cash, Credit Card |
Location | The location where the transaction occurred. May contain missing or invalid values. | In-store, Takeaway |
Transaction Date | The date of the transaction. May contain missing or incorrect values. | 2023-01-01 |
Missing Values:
Item, Payment Method, Location) may contain missing values represented as None or empty cells.Invalid Values:
"ERROR" or "UNKNOWN" to simulate real-world data issues.Price Consistency:
The dataset includes the following menu items with their respective price ranges:
| Item | Price($) |
|---|---|
| Coffee | 2 |
| Tea | 1.5 |
| Sandwich | 4 |
| Salad | 5 |
| Cake | 3 |
| Cookie | 1 |
| Smoothie | 4 |
| Juice | 3 |
This dataset is suitable for: - Practicing data cleaning techniques such as handling missing values, removing duplicates, and correcting invalid entries. - Exploring EDA techniques like visualizations and summary statistics. - Performing feature engineering for machine learning workflows.
To clean this dataset, consider the following steps: 1. Handle Missing Values: - Fill missing numeric values with the median or mean. - Replace missing categorical values with the mode or "Unknown."
Handle Invalid Values:
"ERROR" and "UNKNOWN" with NaN or appropriate values.Date Consistency:
Feature Engineering:
Day of the Week or Transaction Month, for further analysis.This dataset is released under the CC BY-SA 4.0 License. You are free to use, share, and adapt it, provided you give appropriate credit.
If you have any questions or feedback, feel free to reach out through the dataset's discussion board on Kaggle.
Facebook
TwitterThe mechanism for the association between democratic development and the wealth gap has always been the focus of political and economic research, yet with no consistent conclusion. The reasons for that often are, 1) challenges to generalize the results obtained from analyzing a single country’s time series studies or multinational cross-section data analysis, and 2) deviations in research results caused by missing values or variable selection in panel data analysis. When it comes to the latter one, there are two factors contribute to it. One is that the accuracy of estimation is interfered with the presence of missing values in variables, another is that subjective discretion that must be exercised to select suitable proxies amongst many candidates, which are likely to cause variable selection bias. In order to solve these problems, this study is the pioneeringly research to utilize the machine learning method to interpolate missing values efficiently through the random forest model in this topic, and effectively analyzed cross-country data from 151 countries covering the period 1993–2017. Since this paper measures the importance of different variables to the dependent variable, more appropriate and important variables could be selected to construct a complete regression model. Results from different models come to a consensus that the promotion of democracy can significantly narrow the gap between the rich and the poor, with marginally decreasing effect with respect to wealth. In addition, the study finds out that this mechanism exists only in non-colonial nations or presidential states. Finally, this paper discusses the potential theoretical and policy implications of results.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This dataset contains information on the Surface Soil Moisture (SM) content derived from satellite observations in the microwave domain.
A description of this dataset, including the methodology and validation results, is available at:
Preimesberger, W., Stradiotti, P., and Dorigo, W.: ESA CCI Soil Moisture GAPFILLED: an independent global gap-free satellite climate data record with uncertainty estimates, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 4305–4329, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-4305-2025, 2025.
ESA CCI Soil Moisture is a multi-satellite climate data record that consists of harmonized, daily observations coming from 19 satellites (as of v09.1) operating in the microwave domain. The wealth of satellite information, particularly over the last decade, facilitates the creation of a data record with the highest possible data consistency and coverage.
However, data gaps are still found in the record. This is particularly notable in earlier periods when a limited number of satellites were in operation, but can also arise from various retrieval issues, such as frozen soils, dense vegetation, and radio frequency interference (RFI). These data gaps present a challenge for many users, as they have the potential to obscure relevant events within a study area or are incompatible with (machine learning) software that often relies on gap-free inputs.
Since the requirement of a gap-free ESA CCI SM product was identified, various studies have demonstrated the suitability of different statistical methods to achieve this goal. A fundamental feature of such gap-filling method is to rely only on the original observational record, without need for ancillary variable or model-based information. Due to the intrinsic challenge, there was until present no global, long-term univariate gap-filled product available. In this version of the record, data gaps due to missing satellite overpasses and invalid measurements are filled using the Discrete Cosine Transform (DCT) Penalized Least Squares (PLS) algorithm (Garcia, 2010). A linear interpolation is applied over periods of (potentially) frozen soils with little to no variability in (frozen) soil moisture content. Uncertainty estimates are based on models calibrated in experiments to fill satellite-like gaps introduced to GLDAS Noah reanalysis soil moisture (Rodell et al., 2004), and consider the gap size and local vegetation conditions as parameters that affect the gapfilling performance.
You can use command line tools such as wget or curl to download (and extract) data for multiple years. The following command will download and extract the complete data set to the local directory ~/Download on Linux or macOS systems.
#!/bin/bash
# Set download directory
DOWNLOAD_DIR=~/Downloads
base_url="https://researchdata.tuwien.at/records/3fcxr-cde10/files"
# Loop through years 1991 to 2023 and download & extract data
for year in {1991..2023}; do
echo "Downloading $year.zip..."
wget -q -P "$DOWNLOAD_DIR" "$base_url/$year.zip"
unzip -o "$DOWNLOAD_DIR/$year.zip" -d $DOWNLOAD_DIR
rm "$DOWNLOAD_DIR/$year.zip"
done
The dataset provides global daily estimates for the 1991-2023 period at 0.25° (~25 km) horizontal grid resolution. Daily images are grouped by year (YYYY), each subdirectory containing one netCDF image file for a specific day (DD), month (MM) in a 2-dimensional (longitude, latitude) grid system (CRS: WGS84). The file name has the following convention:
ESACCI-SOILMOISTURE-L3S-SSMV-COMBINED_GAPFILLED-YYYYMMDD000000-fv09.1r1.nc
Each netCDF file contains 3 coordinate variables (WGS84 longitude, latitude and time stamp), as well as the following data variables:
Additional information for each variable is given in the netCDF attributes.
Changes in v9.1r1 (previous version was v09.1):
These data can be read by any software that supports Climate and Forecast (CF) conform metadata standards for netCDF files, such as:
The following records are all part of the ESA CCI Soil Moisture science data records community
| 1 |
ESA CCI SM MODELFREE Surface Soil Moisture Record | <a href="https://doi.org/10.48436/svr1r-27j77" target="_blank" |
Facebook
Twitter🚗 Car MSRP Analysis — Exploratory Data Analysis (EDA)
📘 Overview
This project performs an in-depth Exploratory Data Analysis (EDA) on a dataset of cars and their characteristics in order to understand which features most strongly influence the MSRP (Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price). The work includes:
Data loading and cleaning
Handling missing values
Basic feature engineering
Outlier handling for visualization
Exploratory Data Analysis and visualizations… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/netzer97/car_msrp_eda_netzer_v2.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
This synthetic dataset contains 4,362 rows and five columns, including both numerical and categorical data. It is designed for data cleaning, imputation, and analysis tasks, featuring structured missing values at varying percentages (63%, 4%, 47%, 31%, and 9%).
The dataset includes:
- Category (Categorical): Product category (A, B, C, D)
- Price (Numerical): Randomized product prices
- Rating (Numerical): Ratings between 1 to 5
- Stock (Categorical): Availability status (In Stock, Out of Stock)
- Discount (Numerical): Discount percentage
This dataset is ideal for practicing missing data handling, exploratory data analysis (EDA), and machine learning preprocessing.