About this dataset

Context

The dataset presents median household incomes for various household sizes in South Range, MI, as reported by the U.S. Census Bureau. The dataset highlights the variation in median household income with the size of the family unit, offering valuable insights into economic trends and disparities within different household sizes, aiding in data analysis and decision-making.

Key observations

• Of the 7 household sizes (1 person to 7-or-more person households) reported by the census bureau, South Range did not include 4, 5, 6, or 7-person households. Across the different household sizes in South Range the mean income is $51,844, and the standard deviation is $18,238. The coefficient of variation (CV) is 35.18%. This high CV indicates high relative variability, suggesting that the incomes vary significantly across different sizes of households.
• In the most recent year, 2021, The smallest household size for which the bureau reported a median household income was 1-person households, with an income of $31,226. It then further increased to $65,869 for 3-person households, the largest household size for which the bureau reported a median household income.

https://i.neilsberg.com/ch/south-range-mi-median-household-income-by-household-size.jpeg" alt="South Range, MI median household income, by household size (in 2022 inflation-adjusted dollars)">

Content

When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2017-2021 5-Year Estimates.

Household Sizes:

• 1-person households
• 2-person households
• 3-person households
• 4-person households
• 5-person households
• 6-person households
• 7-or-more-person households

Variables / Data Columns

• Household Size: This column showcases 7 household sizes ranging from 1-person households to 7-or-more-person households (As mentioned above).
• Median Household Income: Median household income, in 2022 inflation-adjusted dollars for the specific household size.

Good to know

Margin of Error

Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.

Custom data

If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.

Inspiration

Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.

Recommended for further research

This dataset is a part of the main dataset for South Range median household income. You can refer the same here

This dataset consists of mathematical question and answer pairs, from a range of question types at roughly school-level difficulty. This is designed to test the mathematical learning and algebraic reasoning skills of learning models.

## Example questions

 Question: Solve -42*r + 27*c = -1167 and 130*r + 4*c = 372 for r.
 Answer: 4
 
 Question: Calculate -841880142.544 + 411127.
 Answer: -841469015.544
 
 Question: Let x(g) = 9*g + 1. Let q(c) = 2*c + 1. Let f(i) = 3*i - 39. Let w(j) = q(x(j)). Calculate f(w(a)).
 Answer: 54*a - 30

It contains 2 million (question, answer) pairs per module, with questions limited to 160 characters in length, and answers to 30 characters in length. Note the training data for each question type is split into "train-easy", "train-medium", and "train-hard". This allows training models via a curriculum. The data can also be mixed together uniformly from these training datasets to obtain the results reported in the paper. Categories:

• algebra (linear equations, polynomial roots, sequences)
• arithmetic (pairwise operations and mixed expressions, surds)
• calculus (differentiation)
• comparison (closest numbers, pairwise comparisons, sorting)
• measurement (conversion, working with time)
• numbers (base conversion, remainders, common divisors and multiples, primality, place value, rounding numbers)
• polynomials (addition, simplification, composition, evaluating, expansion)
• probability (sampling without replacement)

The “Fused Image dataset for convolutional neural Network-based crack Detection” (FIND) is a large-scale image dataset with pixel-level ground truth crack data for deep learning-based crack segmentation analysis. It features four types of image data including raw intensity image, raw range (i.e., elevation) image, filtered range image, and fused raw image. The FIND dataset consists of 2500 image patches (dimension: 256x256 pixels) and their ground truth crack maps for each of the four data types.

The images contained in this dataset were collected from multiple bridge decks and roadways under real-world conditions. A laser scanning device was adopted for data acquisition such that the captured raw intensity and raw range images have pixel-to-pixel location correspondence (i.e., spatial co-registration feature). The filtered range data were generated by applying frequency domain filtering to eliminate image disturbances (e.g., surface variations, and grooved patterns) from the raw range data [1]. The fused image data were obtained by combining the raw range and raw intensity data to achieve cross-domain feature correlation [2,3]. Please refer to [4] for a comprehensive benchmark study performed using the FIND dataset to investigate the impact from different types of image data on deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) performance.

If you share or use this dataset, please cite [4] and [5] in any relevant documentation.

In addition, an image dataset for crack classification has also been published at [6].

References:

[1] Shanglian Zhou, & Wei Song. (2020). Robust Image-Based Surface Crack Detection Using Range Data. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 34(2), 04019054. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)cp.1943-5487.0000873

[2] Shanglian Zhou, & Wei Song. (2021). Crack segmentation through deep convolutional neural networks and heterogeneous image fusion. Automation in Construction, 125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103605

[3] Shanglian Zhou, & Wei Song. (2020). Deep learning–based roadway crack classification with heterogeneous image data fusion. Structural Health Monitoring, 20(3), 1274-1293. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921720948434

[4] Shanglian Zhou, Carlos Canchila, & Wei Song. (2023). Deep learning-based crack segmentation for civil infrastructure: data types, architectures, and benchmarked performance. Automation in Construction, 146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104678

5 Shanglian Zhou, Carlos Canchila, & Wei Song. (2022). Fused Image dataset for convolutional neural Network-based crack Detection (FIND) [Data set]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6383044

[6] Wei Song, & Shanglian Zhou. (2020). Laser-scanned roadway range image dataset (LRRD). Laser-scanned Range Image Dataset from Asphalt and Concrete Roadways for DCNN-based Crack Classification, DesignSafe-CI. https://doi.org/10.17603/ds2-bzv3-nc78

About this dataset

Context

The dataset tabulates the population of Grass Range by gender across 18 age groups. It lists the male and female population in each age group along with the gender ratio for Grass Range. The dataset can be utilized to understand the population distribution of Grass Range by gender and age. For example, using this dataset, we can identify the largest age group for both Men and Women in Grass Range. Additionally, it can be used to see how the gender ratio changes from birth to senior most age group and male to female ratio across each age group for Grass Range.

Key observations

Largest age group (population): Male # 35-39 years (7) | Female # 70-74 years (36). Source: U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2019-2023 5-Year Estimates.

Content

When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2019-2023 5-Year Estimates.

Age groups:

• Under 5 years
• 5 to 9 years
• 10 to 14 years
• 15 to 19 years
• 20 to 24 years
• 25 to 29 years
• 30 to 34 years
• 35 to 39 years
• 40 to 44 years
• 45 to 49 years
• 50 to 54 years
• 55 to 59 years
• 60 to 64 years
• 65 to 69 years
• 70 to 74 years
• 75 to 79 years
• 80 to 84 years
• 85 years and over

Scope of gender :

Please note that American Community Survey asks a question about the respondents current sex, but not about gender, sexual orientation, or sex at birth. The question is intended to capture data for biological sex, not gender. Respondents are supposed to respond with the answer as either of Male or Female. Our research and this dataset mirrors the data reported as Male and Female for gender distribution analysis.

Variables / Data Columns

• Age Group: This column displays the age group for the Grass Range population analysis. Total expected values are 18 and are define above in the age groups section.
• Population (Male): The male population in the Grass Range is shown in the following column.
• Population (Female): The female population in the Grass Range is shown in the following column.
• Gender Ratio: Also known as the sex ratio, this column displays the number of males per 100 females in Grass Range for each age group.

Good to know

Margin of Error

Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.

Custom data

If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.

Inspiration

Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.

Recommended for further research

This dataset is a part of the main dataset for Grass Range Population by Gender. You can refer the same here

These Sea Surface Height Anomalies (SSHA) are derived from the Jason-1 Geophysical Data Record (GDR) Geodetic Mission. Jason-1 is an altimetric mission whose instruments make direct observations of the following quantities: altimeter range, significant wave height, ocean radar backscatter cross-section (a measure of wind speed), ionospheric electron content (derived by a simple formula), tropospheric water content, and position relative to the GPS satellite constellation. Using the various parameter the SSHA can be calculated and are provided in this dataset. The data are in NetCDF format. This is not the official dataset from the project and therefore not vetted. If you require a vetted product you will need to calculate SSHA from the GDR product which can be found in PO.DAAC Drive at https://podaac-tools.jpl.nasa.gov/drive/files/allData/jason1/L2/gdr_c_geodetic/ . The documentation has the calculation for SSHA and can be found in PO.DAAC Drive at https://podaac-tools.jpl.nasa.gov/drive/files/allData/jason1/L2/gdr_c/docs/Handbook_Jason_v4-1.pdf .

This data set contains U.S. station surface observations that were digitized from the original forms by the Climate Database Modernization ... (CDMP). Data are available for more than 200 stations (mainly at airports, but also some city weather bureau offices) that made observations at hourly intervals at least during the daytime hours and often over the full 24-hour day. The general period of record for these stations is 1928-1948, though this varies by individual station. To find out what is available, see this inventory. A significant effort was made by DSS to correct errors in the digitized data, especially dates, times, and pressures. For more information about this work, see this document. We have also received data for more than 130 U.S. stations that were digitized from Form 1001. These stations, which were usually city weather bureau offices, generally took observations once, twice, or four times daily. Some stations have data back as far as late 1892. An inventory can be viewed which shows stations and their date range coverage. These data will be made available to the community when errors in the digitized data have been corrected.

The U.S. Geological Survey has been characterizing the regional variation in shear stress on the sea floor and sediment mobility through statistical descriptors. The purpose of this project is to identify patterns in stress in order to inform habitat delineation or decisions for anthropogenic use of the continental shelf. The statistical characterization spans the continental shelf from the coast to approximately 120 m water depth, at approximately 5 km resolution. Time-series of wave and circulation are created using numerical models, and near-bottom output of steady and oscillatory velocities and an estimate of bottom roughness are used to calculate a time-series of bottom shear stress at 1-hour intervals. Statistical descriptions such as the median and 95th percentile, which are the output included with this database, are then calculated to create a two-dimensional picture of the regional patterns in shear stress. In addition, time-series of stress are compared to critical stress values at select points calculated from observed surface sediment texture data to determine estimates of sea floor mobility.

Techsalerator’s News Event Data in Asia offers a detailed and expansive dataset designed to provide businesses, analysts, journalists, and researchers with comprehensive insights into significant news events across the Asian continent. This dataset captures and categorizes major events reported from a diverse range of news sources, including press releases, industry news sites, blogs, and PR platforms, offering valuable perspectives on regional developments, economic shifts, political changes, and cultural occurrences.

Key Features of the Dataset: Extensive Coverage:

The dataset aggregates news events from a wide range of sources such as company press releases, industry-specific news outlets, blogs, PR sites, and traditional media. This broad coverage ensures a diverse array of information from multiple reporting channels. Categorization of Events:

News events are categorized into various types including business and economic updates, political developments, technological advancements, legal and regulatory changes, and cultural events. This categorization helps users quickly find and analyze information relevant to their interests or sectors. Real-Time Updates:

The dataset is updated regularly to include the most current events, ensuring users have access to the latest news and can stay informed about recent developments as they happen. Geographic Segmentation:

Events are tagged with their respective countries and regions within Asia. This geographic segmentation allows users to filter and analyze news events based on specific locations, facilitating targeted research and analysis. Event Details:

Each event entry includes comprehensive details such as the date of occurrence, source of the news, a description of the event, and relevant keywords. This thorough detailing helps users understand the context and significance of each event. Historical Data:

The dataset includes historical news event data, enabling users to track trends and perform comparative analysis over time. This feature supports longitudinal studies and provides insights into the evolution of news events. Advanced Search and Filter Options:

Users can search and filter news events based on criteria such as date range, event type, location, and keywords. This functionality allows for precise and efficient retrieval of relevant information. Asian Countries and Territories Covered: Central Asia: Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Tajikistan Turkmenistan Uzbekistan East Asia: China Hong Kong (Special Administrative Region of China) Japan Mongolia North Korea South Korea Taiwan South Asia: Afghanistan Bangladesh Bhutan India Maldives Nepal Pakistan Sri Lanka Southeast Asia: Brunei Cambodia East Timor (Timor-Leste) Indonesia Laos Malaysia Myanmar (Burma) Philippines Singapore Thailand Vietnam Western Asia (Middle East): Armenia Azerbaijan Bahrain Cyprus Georgia Iraq Israel Jordan Kuwait Lebanon Oman Palestine Qatar Saudi Arabia Syria Turkey (partly in Europe, but often included in Asia contextually) United Arab Emirates Yemen Benefits of the Dataset: Strategic Insights: Businesses and analysts can use the dataset to gain insights into significant regional developments, economic conditions, and political changes, aiding in strategic decision-making and market analysis. Market and Industry Trends: The dataset provides valuable information on industry-specific trends and events, helping users understand market dynamics and identify emerging opportunities. Media and PR Monitoring: Journalists and PR professionals can track relevant news across Asia, enabling them to monitor media coverage, identify emerging stories, and manage public relations efforts effectively. Academic and Research Use: Researchers can utilize the dataset for longitudinal studies, trend analysis, and academic research on various topics related to Asian news and events. Techsalerator’s News Event Data in Asia is a crucial resource for accessing and analyzing significant news events across the continent. By offering detailed, categorized, and up-to-date information, it supports effective decision-making, research, and media monitoring across diverse sectors.

Simulation R code is provided in a format where it can be used flexibly as desired by a researcher. Use in a HPC environment will require use of wrapper scripts to run the functions multiple times with different parameter sets.

The plotting code will run with the input data files provided (network plotting requires the parameter set csv and result plotting requires the summarised data csv)

Title of Dataset: HomeRange: A global database of mammalian home ranges

Mammalian home range papers were compiled via an extensive literature search. All home range values were extracted from the literature including individual, group and population-level home range values. Associated values were also compiled including species names, methodological information on data collection, home-range estimation method, period of data collection, study coordinates and name of location, as well as species traits derived from the studies, such as body mass, life stage, reproductive status and locomotor habit.

We also provide an R package, which can be installed from https://github.com/SHoeks/HomeRange. The HomeRange R package provides functions for downloading the latest version of the HomeRange database and loading it as a standard dataframe into R, plotting several statistics of the database and finally attaching species traits (e.g. species average body mass, trophic level). from the CO...

About this dataset

Context

The dataset tabulates the Grass Range population distribution across 18 age groups. It lists the population in each age group along with the percentage population relative of the total population for Grass Range. The dataset can be utilized to understand the population distribution of Grass Range by age. For example, using this dataset, we can identify the largest age group in Grass Range.

Key observations

The largest age group in Grass Range, MT was for the group of age 70 to 74 years years with a population of 41 (42.27%), according to the ACS 2019-2023 5-Year Estimates. At the same time, the smallest age group in Grass Range, MT was the 25 to 29 years years with a population of 0 (0%). Source: U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2019-2023 5-Year Estimates

Content

When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2019-2023 5-Year Estimates

Age groups:

• Under 5 years
• 5 to 9 years
• 10 to 14 years
• 15 to 19 years
• 20 to 24 years
• 25 to 29 years
• 30 to 34 years
• 35 to 39 years
• 40 to 44 years
• 45 to 49 years
• 50 to 54 years
• 55 to 59 years
• 60 to 64 years
• 65 to 69 years
• 70 to 74 years
• 75 to 79 years
• 80 to 84 years
• 85 years and over

Variables / Data Columns

• Age Group: This column displays the age group in consideration
• Population: The population for the specific age group in the Grass Range is shown in this column.
• % of Total Population: This column displays the population of each age group as a proportion of Grass Range total population. Please note that the sum of all percentages may not equal one due to rounding of values.

Good to know

Margin of Error

Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.

Custom data

If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.

Inspiration

Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.

Recommended for further research

This dataset is a part of the main dataset for Grass Range Population by Age. You can refer the same here

The dataset comprises developer test results of Maven projects with flaky tests across a range of consecutive commits from the projects' git commit histories. The Maven projects are a subset of those investigated in an OOPSLA 2020 paper. The commit range for this dataset has been chosen as the flakiness-introducing commit (FIC) and iDFlakies-commit (see the OOPSLA paper for details). The commit hashes have been obtained from the IDoFT dataset.

The dataset will be presented at the 1st International Flaky Tests Workshop 2024 (FTW 2024). Please refer to our extended abstract for more details about the motivation for and context of this dataset.

The following table provides a summary of the data.

Slug (Module) FIC Hash Tests Commits Av. Commits/Test Flaky Tests Tests w/ Consistent Failures Total Distinct Histories

TooTallNate/Java-WebSocket 822d40 146 75 75 24 1 2.6x10^9

apereo/java-cas-client (cas-client-core) 5e3655 157 65 61.7 3 2 1.0x10^7

eclipse-ee4j/tyrus (tests/e2e/standard-config) ce3b8c 185 16 16 12 0 261

feroult/yawp (yawp-testing/yawp-testing-appengine) abae17 1 191 191 1 1 8

fluent/fluent-logger-java 5fd463 19 131 105.6 11 2 8.0x10^32

fluent/fluent-logger-java 87e957 19 160 122.4 11 3 2.1x10^31

javadelight/delight-nashorn-sandbox d0d651 81 113 100.6 2 5 4.2x10^10

javadelight/delight-nashorn-sandbox d19eee 81 93 83.5 1 5 2.6x10^9

sonatype-nexus-community/nexus-repository-helm 5517c8 18 32 32 0 0 18

spotify/helios (helios-services) 23260 190 448 448 0 37 190

spotify/helios (helios-testing) 78a864 43 474 474 0 7 43

The columns are composed of the following variables:

Slug (Module): The project's GitHub slug (i.e., the project's URL is https://github.com/{Slug}) and, if specified, the module for which tests have been executed.

FIC Hash: The flakiness-introducing commit hash for a known flaky test as described in this OOPSLA 2020 paper. As different flaky tests have different FIC hashes, there may be multiple rows for the same slug/module with different FIC hashes.

Tests: The number of distinct test class and method combinations over the entire considered commit range.

Commits: The number of commits in the considered commit range

Av. Commits/Test: The average number of commits per test class and method combination in the considered commit range. The number of commits may vary for each test class, as some tests may be added or removed within the considered commit range.

Flaky Tests: The number of distinct test class and method combinations that have more than one test result (passed/skipped/error/failure + exception type, if any + assertion message, if any) across 30 repeated test suite executions on at least one commit in the considered commit range.

Tests w/ Consistent Failures: The number of distinct test class and method combinations that have the same error or failure result (error/failure + exception type, if any + assertion message, if any) across all 30 repeated test suite executions on at least one commit in the considered commit range.

Total Distinct Histories: The number of distinct test results (passed/skipped/error/failure + exception type, if any + assertion message, if any) for all test class and method combinations along all commits for that test in the considered commit range.

This dataset contains ERA5 initial release (ERA5t) model level analysis parameter data. ERA5t is the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECWMF) ERA5 reanalysis project initial release available upto 5 days behind the present data. CEDA will maintain a 6 month rolling archive of these data with overlap to the verified ERA5 data - see linked datasets on this record. This dataset contains a limited selection of all available variables and have been converted to netCDF from the original GRIB files held on the ECMWF system. They have also been translated onto a regular latitude-longitude grid during the extraction process from the ECMWF holdings. For a fuller set of variables please see the linked Copernicus Data Store (CDS) data tool, linked to from this record.

Surface level analysis and forecast data to complement this dataset are also available. Data from a 10 member ensemble, run at lower spatial and temporal resolution, were also produced to provide an uncertainty estimate for the output from the single high resolution (hourly output at 31 km grid spacing) 'HRES' realisation producing data in this dataset.

Data Access: The data in the research collection provided may only be used for research purposes. Portions of the data are copyrighted and have commercial value as data, so you must be careful to use it only for research purposes. Due to these restrictions, the collection is not open data. Please download the Agreement at Data Sharing Agreement and send the signed form to fakenewstask@gmail.com .

Citation

Please cite our work as

@article{shahi2021overview,
 title={Overview of the CLEF-2021 CheckThat! lab task 3 on fake news detection},
 author={Shahi, Gautam Kishore and Stru{\ss}, Julia Maria and Mandl, Thomas},
 journal={Working Notes of CLEF},
 year={2021}
}

Problem Definition: Given the text of a news article, determine whether the main claim made in the article is true, partially true, false, or other (e.g., claims in dispute) and detect the topical domain of the article. This task will run in English.

Subtask 3A: Multi-class fake news detection of news articles (English) Sub-task A would detect fake news designed as a four-class classification problem. The training data will be released in batches and roughly about 900 articles with the respective label. Given the text of a news article, determine whether the main claim made in the article is true, partially true, false, or other. Our definitions for the categories are as follows:

• False - The main claim made in an article is untrue.

• Partially False - The main claim of an article is a mixture of true and false information. The article contains partially true and partially false information but cannot be considered 100% true. It includes all articles in categories like partially false, partially true, mostly true, miscaptioned, misleading etc., as defined by different fact-checking services.

• True - This rating indicates that the primary elements of the main claim are demonstrably true.

• Other- An article that cannot be categorised as true, false, or partially false due to lack of evidence about its claims. This category includes articles in dispute and unproven articles.

Subtask 3B: Topical Domain Classification of News Articles (English) Fact-checkers require background expertise to identify the truthfulness of an article. The categorisation will help to automate the sampling process from a stream of data. Given the text of a news article, determine the topical domain of the article (English). This is a classification problem. The task is to categorise fake news articles into six topical categories like health, election, crime, climate, election, education. This task will be offered for a subset of the data of Subtask 3A.

Input Data

The data will be provided in the format of Id, title, text, rating, the domain; the description of the columns is as follows:

Task 3a

• ID- Unique identifier of the news article
• Title- Title of the news article
• text- Text mentioned inside the news article
• our rating - class of the news article as false, partially false, true, other

Task 3b

• public_id- Unique identifier of the news article
• Title- Title of the news article
• text- Text mentioned inside the news article
• domain - domain of the given news article(applicable only for task B)

Output data format

Task 3a

• public_id- Unique identifier of the news article
• predicted_rating- predicted class

Sample File

public_id, predicted_rating
1, false
2, true

Task 3b

• public_id- Unique identifier of the news article
• predicted_domain- predicted domain

Sample file

public_id, predicted_domain
1, health
2, crime

Additional data for Training

To train your model, the participant can use additional data with a similar format; some datasets are available over the web. We don't provide the background truth for those datasets. For testing, we will not use any articles from other datasets. Some of the possible source:

• Fakenews Classification Datasets
• Fake News Detection Challenge KDD 2020
• FakeNewsNet

IMPORTANT!

1. Fake news article used for task 3b is a subset of task 3a.
2. We have used the data from 2010 to 2021, and the content of fake news is mixed up with several topics like election, COVID-19 etc.

Evaluation Metrics

This task is evaluated as a classification task. We will use the F1-macro measure for the ranking of teams. There is a limit of 5 runs (total and not per day), and only one person from a team is allowed to submit runs.

Submission Link: https://competitions.codalab.org/competitions/31238

Related Work

• Shahi GK. AMUSED: An Annotation Framework of Multi-modal Social Media Data. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.00502. 2020 Oct 1.https://arxiv.org/pdf/2010.00502.pdf
• G. K. Shahi and D. Nandini, “FakeCovid – a multilingualcross-domain fact check news dataset for covid-19,” inWorkshop Proceedings of the 14th International AAAIConference on Web and Social Media, 2020. http://workshop-proceedings.icwsm.org/abstract?id=2020_14
• Shahi, G. K., Dirkson, A., & Majchrzak, T. A. (2021). An exploratory study of covid-19 misinformation on twitter. Online Social Networks and Media, 22, 100104. doi: 10.1016/j.osnem.2020.100104

The dataset collection in focus comprises an assortment of tables, each carrying a distinct set of data. These tables are meticulously sourced from the website of Lantmäteriet (The Swedish Mapping, Cadastral and Land Registration Authority) in Sweden. The dataset provides a wide range of valuable data, including but not limited to, information about companies, geospatial data, meteorological data, statistical data, and earth observation & environmental data. The tables present the data in an organized manner, with the information arranged systematically in columns and rows. This makes it convenient to analyze and draw insights from the dataset. Overall, it's a comprehensive dataset collection that offers a diverse and substantial range of information.

Map on transparency, with annotation in pencil, rich in detail, in excellent condition. - Observation measure: equal parts interpretation and observation. - Map size: B1. Keywords: CENTRAL OTAGO; THE HORN RANGE; GEOLOGIC MAPS; DOOLANS CREEK; KAWARAU RIVER; NEVIS RIVER

This data presents the Reference Signal Received power for LTE, GSM and HSPA. The Mobile signal measurement were taken around Covenant University, Nigeria. The experiment setup was on an indoor scenario. The data was collected to investigate the best network for Mobile subscribers on roaming services and local subscriber's high performance and data rates. After the experiment, Exploratory Data Analysis (EDA) was used to visualize the best Network; The data can be applied to determine the network services providing the best QoS between 4th Generation LTE/4G, 3rd generation UMTS/HSPA, and GSM. The data is vital for indoor localization applications and the mobile network provider for network optimizationThe experiment was conducted between July 1 and July 30, 2020. Measurements were taken from 7:30 am to 11.00 pm. The primary device collected data at an interval of 30 minutes within the time range, while the supporting devices randomly collected data during the day.

This archived Paleoclimatology Study is available from the NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), under the World Data Service (WDS) for Paleoclimatology. The associated NCEI study type is Lake. The data include parameters of paleolimnology with a geographic location of Alaska, United States Of America. The time period coverage is from 14828 to 0 in calendar years before present (BP). See metadata information for parameter and study location details. Please cite this study when using the data.

The dataset collection in question consists of a range of data tables, all of which are interconnected. These tables contain intricate data, diligently compiled from the service interface of the Statistics Centre, also known in Finnish as 'Tilastokeskus'. This data is sourced directly from Finland. The dataset is comprehensive, providing a wide scope of statistical areas and greater regions, making it an invaluable resource for those seeking detailed demographic and regional data. The year 2023 is specifically highlighted in this collection, indicating the data's relevance to that particular year. This dataset is licensed under CC BY 4.0 (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.fi).

Our dataset provides detailed and precise insights into the business, commercial, and industrial aspects of any given area in the USA (Including Point of Interest (POI) Data and Foot Traffic. The dataset is divided into 150x150 sqm areas (geohash 7) and has over 50 variables. - Use it for different applications: Our combined dataset, which includes POI and foot traffic data, can be employed for various purposes. Different data teams use it to guide retailers and FMCG brands in site selection, fuel marketing intelligence, analyze trade areas, and assess company risk. Our dataset has also proven to be useful for real estate investment.- Get reliable data: Our datasets have been processed, enriched, and tested so your data team can use them more quickly and accurately.- Ideal for trainning ML models. The high quality of our geographic information layers results from more than seven years of work dedicated to the deep understanding and modeling of geospatial Big Data. Among the features that distinguished this dataset is the use of anonymized and user-compliant mobile device GPS location, enriched with other alternative and public data.- Easy to use: Our dataset is user-friendly and can be easily integrated to your current models. Also, we can deliver your data in different formats, like .csv, according to your analysis requirements. - Get personalized guidance: In addition to providing reliable datasets, we advise your analysts on their correct implementation.Our data scientists can guide your internal team on the optimal algorithms and models to get the most out of the information we provide (without compromising the security of your internal data).Answer questions like: - What places does my target user visit in a particular area? Which are the best areas to place a new POS?- What is the average yearly income of users in a particular area?- What is the influx of visits that my competition receives?- What is the volume of traffic surrounding my current POS?This dataset is useful for getting insights from industries like:- Retail & FMCG- Banking, Finance, and Investment- Car Dealerships- Real Estate- Convenience Stores- Pharma and medical laboratories- Restaurant chains and franchises- Clothing chains and franchisesOur dataset includes more than 50 variables, such as:- Number of pedestrians seen in the area.- Number of vehicles seen in the area.- Average speed of movement of the vehicles seen in the area.- Point of Interest (POIs) (in number and type) seen in the area (supermarkets, pharmacies, recreational locations, restaurants, offices, hotels, parking lots, wholesalers, financial services, pet services, shopping malls, among others). - Average yearly income range (anonymized and aggregated) of the devices seen in the area.Notes to better understand this dataset:- POI confidence means the average confidence of POIs in the area. In this case, POIs are any kind of location, such as a restaurant, a hotel, or a library. - Category confidences, for example"food_drinks_tobacco_retail_confidence" indicates how confident we are in the existence of food/drink/tobacco retail locations in the area. - We added predictions for The Home Depot and Lowe's Home Improvement stores in the dataset sample. These predictions were the result of a machine-learning model that was trained with the data. Knowing where the current stores are, we can find the most similar areas for new stores to open.How efficient is a Geohash?Geohash is a faster, cost-effective geofencing option that reduces input data load and provides actionable information. Its benefits include faster querying, reduced cost, minimal configuration, and ease of use.Geohash ranges from 1 to 12 characters. The dataset can be split into variable-size geohashes, with the default being geohash7 (150m x 150m).