Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Here we present a dataset, MNIST4OD, of large size (number of dimensions and number of instances) suitable for Outliers Detection task.The dataset is based on the famous MNIST dataset (http://yann.lecun.com/exdb/mnist/).We build MNIST4OD in the following way:To distinguish between outliers and inliers, we choose the images belonging to a digit as inliers (e.g. digit 1) and we sample with uniform probability on the remaining images as outliers such as their number is equal to 10% of that of inliers. We repeat this dataset generation process for all digits. For implementation simplicity we then flatten the images (28 X 28) into vectors.Each file MNIST_x.csv.gz contains the corresponding dataset where the inlier class is equal to x.The data contains one instance (vector) in each line where the last column represents the outlier label (yes/no) of the data point. The data contains also a column which indicates the original image class (0-9).See the following numbers for a complete list of the statistics of each datasets ( Name | Instances | Dimensions | Number of Outliers in % ):MNIST_0 | 7594 | 784 | 10MNIST_1 | 8665 | 784 | 10MNIST_2 | 7689 | 784 | 10MNIST_3 | 7856 | 784 | 10MNIST_4 | 7507 | 784 | 10MNIST_5 | 6945 | 784 | 10MNIST_6 | 7564 | 784 | 10MNIST_7 | 8023 | 784 | 10MNIST_8 | 7508 | 784 | 10MNIST_9 | 7654 | 784 | 10
Understanding the statistics of fluctuation driven flows in the boundary layer of magnetically confined plasmas is desired to accurately model the lifetime of the vacuum vessel components. Mirror Langmuir probes (MLPs) are a novel diagnostic that uniquely allow us to sample the plasma parameters on a time scale shorter than the characteristic time scale of their fluctuations. Sudden large-amplitude fluctuations in the plasma degrade the precision and accuracy of the plasma parameters reported by MLPs for cases in which the probe bias range is of insufficient amplitude. While some data samples can readily be classified as valid and invalid, we find that such a classification may be ambiguous for up to 40% of data sampled for the plasma parameters and bias voltages considered in this study. In this contribution, we employ an autoencoder (AE) to learn a low-dimensional representation of valid data samples. By definition, the coordinates in this space are the features that mostly characterize valid data. Ambiguous data samples are classified in this space using standard classifiers for vectorial data. In this way, we avoid defining complicated threshold rules to identify outliers, which require strong assumptions and introduce biases in the analysis. By removing the outliers that are identified in the latent low-dimensional space of the AE, we find that the average conductive and convective radial heat fluxes are between approximately 5% and 15% lower as when removing outliers identified by threshold values. For contributions to the radial heat flux due to triple correlations, the difference is up to 40%.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
ABSTRACT The purpose of this work is to present the Weighted Forward Search (FSW) method for the detection of outliers in asset pricing data. This new estimator, which is based on an algorithm that downweights the most anomalous observations of the dataset, is tested using both simulated and empirical asset pricing data. The impact of outliers on the estimation of asset pricing models is assessed under different scenarios, and the results are evaluated with associated statistical tests based on this new approach. Our proposal generates an alternative procedure for robust estimation of portfolio betas, allowing for the comparison between concurrent asset pricing models. The algorithm, which is both efficient and robust to outliers, is used to provide robust estimates of the models’ parameters in a comparison with traditional econometric estimation methods usually used in the literature. In particular, the precision of the alphas is highly increased when the Forward Search (FS) method is used. We use Monte Carlo simulations, and also the well-known dataset of equity factor returns provided by Prof. Kenneth French, consisting of the 25 Fama-French portfolios on the United States of America equity market using single and three-factor models, on monthly and annual basis. Our results indicate that the marginal rejection of the Fama-French three-factor model is influenced by the presence of outliers in the portfolios, when using monthly returns. In annual data, the use of robust methods increases the rejection level of null alphas in the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) and the Fama-French three-factor model, with more efficient estimates in the absence of outliers and consistent alphas when outliers are present.
There has been a tremendous increase in the volume of sensor data collected over the last decade for different monitoring tasks. For example, petabytes of earth science data are collected from modern satellites, in-situ sensors and different climate models. Similarly, huge amount of flight operational data is downloaded for different commercial airlines. These different types of datasets need to be analyzed for finding outliers. Information extraction from such rich data sources using advanced data mining methodologies is a challenging task not only due to the massive volume of data, but also because these datasets are physically stored at different geographical locations with only a subset of features available at any location. Moving these petabytes of data to a single location may waste a lot of bandwidth. To solve this problem, in this paper, we present a novel algorithm which can identify outliers in the entire data without moving all the data to a single location. The method we propose only centralizes a very small sample from the different data subsets at different locations. We analytically prove and experimentally verify that the algorithm offers high accuracy compared to complete centralization with only a fraction of the communication cost. We show that our algorithm is highly relevant to both earth sciences and aeronautics by describing applications in these domains. The performance of the algorithm is demonstrated on two large publicly available datasets: (1) the NASA MODIS satellite images and (2) a simulated aviation dataset generated by the ‘Commercial Modular Aero-Propulsion System Simulation’ (CMAPSS).
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Identification of errors or anomalous values, collectively considered outliers, assists in exploring data or through removing outliers improves statistical analysis. In biomechanics, outlier detection methods have explored the ‘shape’ of the entire cycles, although exploring fewer points using a ‘moving-window’ may be advantageous. Hence, the aim was to develop a moving-window method for detecting trials with outliers in intra-participant time-series data. Outliers were detected through two stages for the strides (mean 38 cycles) from treadmill running. Cycles were removed in stage 1 for one-dimensional (spatial) outliers at each time point using the median absolute deviation, and in stage 2 for two-dimensional (spatial–temporal) outliers using a moving window standard deviation. Significance levels of the t-statistic were used for scaling. Fewer cycles were removed with smaller scaling and smaller window size, requiring more stringent scaling at stage 1 (mean 3.5 cycles removed for 0.0001 scaling) than at stage 2 (mean 2.6 cycles removed for 0.01 scaling with a window size of 1). Settings in the supplied Matlab code should be customised to each data set, and outliers assessed to justify whether to retain or remove those cycles. The method is effective in identifying trials with outliers in intra-participant time series data.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
The zip files contains 12338 datasets for outlier detection investigated in the following papers:(1) Instance space analysis for unsupervised outlier detection Authors : Sevvandi Kandanaarachchi, Mario A. Munoz, Kate Smith-Miles (2) On normalization and algorithm selection for unsupervised outlier detection Authors : Sevvandi Kandanaarachchi, Mario A. Munoz, Rob J. Hyndman, Kate Smith-MilesSome of these datasets were originally discussed in the paper: On the evaluation of unsupervised outlier detection:measures, datasets and an empirical studyAuthors : G. O. Campos, A, Zimek, J. Sander, R. J.G.B. Campello, B. Micenkova, E. Schubert, I. Assent, M.E. Houle.
The following report outlines the workflow used to optimize your Find Outliers result:Initial Data Assessment.There were 721 valid input features.GRM Properties:Min0.0000Max157.0200Mean9.1692Std. Dev.8.4220There were 4 outlier locations; these will not be used to compute the optimal fixed distance band.Scale of AnalysisThe optimal fixed distance band selected was based on peak clustering found at 1894.5039 Meters.Outlier AnalysisCreating the random reference distribution with 499 permutations.There are 248 output features statistically significant based on a FDR correction for multiple testing and spatial dependence.There are 30 statistically significant high outlier features.There are 7 statistically significant low outlier features.There are 202 features part of statistically significant low clusters.There are 9 features part of statistically significant high clusters.OutputPink output features are part of a cluster of high GRM values.Light Blue output features are part of a cluster of low GRM values.Red output features represent high outliers within a cluster of low GRM values.Blue output features represent low outliers within a cluster of high GRM values.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
These files are supplements to the paper titled 'A Robust Two-step Method for Detection of Outlier Sets'.This paper identifies and addresses the need for a robust method that identifies sets of points that collectively deviate from typical patterns in a dataset, which it calls "outlier sets'', while excluding individual points from detection. This new methodology, Outlier Set Two-step Identification (OSTI) employs a two-step approach to detect and label these outlier sets. First, it uses Gaussian Mixture Models for probabilistic clustering, identifying candidate outlier sets based on cluster weights below a predetermined threshold. Second, OSTI measures the Inter-cluster Mahalanobis distance between each candidate outlier set's centroid and the overall dataset mean. OSTI then tests the null hypothesis that this distance does not significantly differ from its theoretical chi-square distribution, enabling the formal detection of outlier sets. We test OSTI systematically on 8,000 synthetic 2D datasets across various inlier configurations and thousands of possible outlier set characteristics. Results show OSTI robustly and consistently detects outlier sets with an average F1 score of 0.92 and an average purity (the degree to which outlier sets identified correspond to those generated synthetically, i.e., our ground truth) of 98.58%. We also compare OSTI with state-of-the-art outlier detection methods, to illuminate how OSTI fills a gap as a tool for the exclusive detection of outlier sets.
There are three files containing Stata data, and do and log-files. These are associated with the empirical models reported in the replication study, “Outlier Analysis: Natural Resources and Immigration Policy,” POLS ONE. Questions or comments regarding these materials should be directed to Seung-Whan Choi, Department of Political Science, University of Illinois at Chicago. His email address is whanchoi@uic.edu and his homepage address is https://whanchoi.people.uic.edu/.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
These data sets were originally created for the following publications:
M. E. Houle, H.-P. Kriegel, P. Kröger, E. Schubert, A. Zimek
Can Shared-Neighbor Distances Defeat the Curse of Dimensionality?
In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Scientific and Statistical Database Management (SSDBM), Heidelberg, Germany, 2010.
H.-P. Kriegel, E. Schubert, A. Zimek
Evaluation of Multiple Clustering Solutions
In 2nd MultiClust Workshop: Discovering, Summarizing and Using Multiple Clusterings Held in Conjunction with ECML PKDD 2011, Athens, Greece, 2011.
The outlier data set versions were introduced in:
E. Schubert, R. Wojdanowski, A. Zimek, H.-P. Kriegel
On Evaluation of Outlier Rankings and Outlier Scores
In Proceedings of the 12th SIAM International Conference on Data Mining (SDM), Anaheim, CA, 2012.
They are derived from the original image data available at https://aloi.science.uva.nl/
The image acquisition process is documented in the original ALOI work: J. M. Geusebroek, G. J. Burghouts, and A. W. M. Smeulders, The Amsterdam library of object images, Int. J. Comput. Vision, 61(1), 103-112, January, 2005
Additional information is available at: https://elki-project.github.io/datasets/multi_view
The following views are currently available:
Feature type | Description | Files |
---|---|---|
Object number | Sparse 1000 dimensional vectors that give the true object assignment | objs.arff.gz |
RGB color histograms | Standard RGB color histograms (uniform binning) | aloi-8d.csv.gz aloi-27d.csv.gz aloi-64d.csv.gz aloi-125d.csv.gz aloi-216d.csv.gz aloi-343d.csv.gz aloi-512d.csv.gz aloi-729d.csv.gz aloi-1000d.csv.gz |
HSV color histograms | Standard HSV/HSB color histograms in various binnings | aloi-hsb-2x2x2.csv.gz aloi-hsb-3x3x3.csv.gz aloi-hsb-4x4x4.csv.gz aloi-hsb-5x5x5.csv.gz aloi-hsb-6x6x6.csv.gz aloi-hsb-7x7x7.csv.gz aloi-hsb-7x2x2.csv.gz aloi-hsb-7x3x3.csv.gz aloi-hsb-14x3x3.csv.gz aloi-hsb-8x4x4.csv.gz aloi-hsb-9x5x5.csv.gz aloi-hsb-13x4x4.csv.gz aloi-hsb-14x5x5.csv.gz aloi-hsb-10x6x6.csv.gz aloi-hsb-14x6x6.csv.gz |
Color similiarity | Average similarity to 77 reference colors (not histograms) 18 colors x 2 sat x 2 bri + 5 grey values (incl. white, black) | aloi-colorsim77.arff.gz (feature subsets are meaningful here, as these features are computed independently of each other) |
Haralick features | First 13 Haralick features (radius 1 pixel) | aloi-haralick-1.csv.gz |
Front to back | Vectors representing front face vs. back faces of individual objects | front.arff.gz |
Basic light | Vectors indicating basic light situations | light.arff.gz |
Manual annotations | Manually annotated object groups of semantically related objects such as cups | manual1.arff.gz |
Outlier Detection Versions
Additionally, we generated a number of subsets for outlier detection:
Feature type | Description | Files |
---|---|---|
RGB Histograms | Downsampled to 100000 objects (553 outliers) | aloi-27d-100000-max10-tot553.csv.gz aloi-64d-100000-max10-tot553.csv.gz |
Downsampled to 75000 objects (717 outliers) | aloi-27d-75000-max4-tot717.csv.gz aloi-64d-75000-max4-tot717.csv.gz | |
Downsampled to 50000 objects (1508 outliers) | aloi-27d-50000-max5-tot1508.csv.gz aloi-64d-50000-max5-tot1508.csv.gz |
In this work we apply and expand on a recently introduced outlier detection algorithm that is based on an unsupervised random forest. We use the algorithm to calculate a similarity measure for stellar spectra from the Apache Point Observatory Galactic Evolution Experiment (APOGEE). We show that the similarity measure traces non-trivial physical properties and contains information about complex structures in the data. We use it for visualization and clustering of the dataset, and discuss its ability to find groups of highly similar objects, including spectroscopic twins. Using the similarity matrix to search the dataset for objects allows us to find objects that are impossible to find using their best fitting model parameters. This includes extreme objects for which the models fail, and rare objects that are outside the scope of the model. We use the similarity measure to detect outliers in the dataset, and find a number of previously unknown Be-type stars, spectroscopic binaries, carbon rich stars, young stars, and a few that we cannot interpret. Our work further demonstrates the potential for scientific discovery when combining machine learning methods with modern survey data. Cone search capability for table J/MNRAS/476/2117/apogeenn (Nearest neighbors APOGEE IDs)
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Cylindrical data are bivariate data formed from the combination of circular and linear variables. Identifying outliers is a crucial step in any data analysis work. This paper proposes a new distribution-free procedure to detect outliers in cylindrical data using the Mahalanobis distance concept. The use of Mahalanobis distance incorporates the correlation between the components of the cylindrical distribution, which had not been accounted for in the earlier papers on outlier detection in cylindrical data. The threshold for declaring an observation to be an outlier can be obtained via parametric or non-parametric bootstrap, depending on whether the underlying distribution is known or unknown. The performance of the proposed method is examined via extensive simulations from the Johnson-Wehrly distribution. The proposed method is applied to two real datasets, and the outliers are identified in those datasets.
https://www.technavio.com/content/privacy-noticehttps://www.technavio.com/content/privacy-notice
Anomaly Detection Market Size 2025-2029
The anomaly detection market size is valued to increase by USD 4.44 billion, at a CAGR of 14.4% from 2024 to 2029. Anomaly detection tools gaining traction in BFSI will drive the anomaly detection market.
Major Market Trends & Insights
North America dominated the market and accounted for a 43% growth during the forecast period.
By Deployment - Cloud segment was valued at USD 1.75 billion in 2023
By Component - Solution segment accounted for the largest market revenue share in 2023
Market Size & Forecast
Market Opportunities: USD 173.26 million
Market Future Opportunities: USD 4441.70 million
CAGR from 2024 to 2029 : 14.4%
Market Summary
Anomaly detection, a critical component of advanced analytics, is witnessing significant adoption across various industries, with the financial services sector leading the charge. The increasing incidence of internal threats and cybersecurity frauds necessitates the need for robust anomaly detection solutions. These tools help organizations identify unusual patterns and deviations from normal behavior, enabling proactive response to potential threats and ensuring operational efficiency. For instance, in a supply chain context, anomaly detection can help identify discrepancies in inventory levels or delivery schedules, leading to cost savings and improved customer satisfaction. In the realm of compliance, anomaly detection can assist in maintaining regulatory adherence by flagging unusual transactions or activities, thereby reducing the risk of penalties and reputational damage.
According to recent research, organizations that implement anomaly detection solutions experience a reduction in error rates by up to 25%. This improvement not only enhances operational efficiency but also contributes to increased customer trust and satisfaction. Despite these benefits, challenges persist, including data quality and the need for real-time processing capabilities. As the market continues to evolve, advancements in machine learning and artificial intelligence are expected to address these challenges and drive further growth.
What will be the Size of the Anomaly Detection Market during the forecast period?
Get Key Insights on Market Forecast (PDF) Request Free Sample
How is the Anomaly Detection Market Segmented ?
The anomaly detection industry research report provides comprehensive data (region-wise segment analysis), with forecasts and estimates in 'USD million' for the period 2025-2029, as well as historical data from 2019-2023 for the following segments.
Deployment
Cloud
On-premises
Component
Solution
Services
End-user
BFSI
IT and telecom
Retail and e-commerce
Manufacturing
Others
Technology
Big data analytics
AI and ML
Data mining and business intelligence
Geography
North America
US
Canada
Mexico
Europe
France
Germany
Spain
UK
APAC
China
India
Japan
Rest of World (ROW)
By Deployment Insights
The cloud segment is estimated to witness significant growth during the forecast period.
The market is witnessing significant growth, driven by the increasing adoption of advanced technologies such as machine learning algorithms, predictive modeling tools, and real-time monitoring systems. Businesses are increasingly relying on anomaly detection solutions to enhance their root cause analysis, improve system health indicators, and reduce false positives. This is particularly true in sectors where data is generated in real-time, such as cybersecurity threat detection, network intrusion detection, and fraud detection systems. Cloud-based anomaly detection solutions are gaining popularity due to their flexibility, scalability, and cost-effectiveness.
This growth is attributed to cloud-based solutions' quick deployment, real-time data visibility, and customization capabilities, which are offered at flexible payment options like monthly subscriptions and pay-as-you-go models. Companies like Anodot, Ltd, Cisco Systems Inc, IBM Corp, and SAS Institute Inc provide both cloud-based and on-premise anomaly detection solutions. Anomaly detection methods include outlier detection, change point detection, and statistical process control. Data preprocessing steps, such as data mining techniques and feature engineering processes, are crucial in ensuring accurate anomaly detection. Data visualization dashboards and alert fatigue mitigation techniques help in managing and interpreting the vast amounts of data generated.
Network traffic analysis, log file analysis, and sensor data integration are essential components of anomaly detection systems. Additionally, risk management frameworks, drift detection algorithms, time series forecasting, and performance degradation detection are vital in maintaining system performance and capacity planning.
How can we discover objects we did not know existed within the large data sets that now abound in astronomy? We present an outlier detection algorithm that we developed, based on an unsupervised Random Forest. We test the algorithm on more than two million galaxy spectra from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey and examine the 400 galaxies with the highest outlier score. We find objects which have extreme emission line ratios and abnormally strong absorption lines, objects with unusual continua, including extremely reddened galaxies. We find galaxy-galaxy gravitational lenses, double-peaked emission line galaxies and close galaxy pairs. We find galaxies with high ionization lines, galaxies that host supernovae and galaxies with unusual gas kinematics. Only a fraction of the outliers we find were reported by previous studies that used specific and tailored algorithms to find a single class of unusual objects. Our algorithm is general and detects all of these classes, and many more, regardless of what makes them peculiar. It can be executed on imaging, time series and other spectroscopic data, operates well with thousands of features, is not sensitive to missing values and is easily parallelizable.
https://choosealicense.com/licenses/unknown/https://choosealicense.com/licenses/unknown/
Dataset Card for "cifar10-outlier"
📚 This dataset is an enriched version of the CIFAR-10 Dataset. The workflow is described in the medium article: Changes of Embeddings during Fine-Tuning of Transformers.
Explore the Dataset
The open source data curation tool Renumics Spotlight allows you to explorer this dataset. You can find a Hugging Face Spaces running Spotlight with this dataset here:
Full Version (High hardware requirement)… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/renumics/cifar10-outlier.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
The Multi-Domain Outlier Detection Dataset contains datasets for conducting outlier detection experiments for four different application domains:
Each dataset contains a "fit" dataset (used for fitting or training outlier detection models), a "score" dataset (used for scoring samples used to evaluate model performance, analogous to test set), and a label dataset (indicates whether samples in the score dataset are considered outliers or not in the domain of each dataset).
To read more about the datasets and how they are used for outlier detection, or to cite this dataset in your own work, please see the following citation:
Kerner, H. R., Rebbapragada, U., Wagstaff, K. L., Lu, S., Dubayah, B., Huff, E., Lee, J., Raman, V., and Kulshrestha, S. (2022). Domain-agnostic Outlier Ranking Algorithms (DORA)-A Configurable Pipeline for Facilitating Outlier Detection in Scientific Datasets. Under review for Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences.
Abstract: Building health management is an important part in running an efficient and cost-effective building. Many problems in a building’s system can go undetected for long periods of time, leading to expensive repairs or wasted resources. This project aims to help detect and diagnose the building‘s health with data driven methods throughout the day. Orca and IMS are two state of the art algorithms that observe an array of building health sensors and provide feedback on the overall system’s health as well as localize the problem to one, or possibly two, components. With this level of feedback the hope is to quickly identify problems and provide appropriate maintenance while reducing the number of complaints and service calls. Introduction: To prepare these technologies for the new installation, the proposed methods are being tested on a current system that behaves similarly to the future green building. Building 241 was determined to best resemble the proposed building 232 and therefore was chosen for this study. Building 241 is currently outfitted with 34 sensors that monitor the heating & cooling temperatures for the air and water systems as well as other various subsystem states. The daily sensor recordings were logged and sent to the IDU group for analysis. The period of analysis was focused from July 1st through August 10th 2009. Methodology: The two algorithms used for analysis were Orca and IMS. Both methods look for anomalies using a distanced based scoring approach. Orca has the ability to use a single data set and find outliers within that data set. This tactic was applied to each day. After scoring each time sample throughout a given day the Orca score profiles were compared by computing the correlation against all other days. Days with high overall correlations were considered normal however days with lower overall correlations were more anomalous. IMS, on the other hand, needs a normal set of data to build a model, which can be applied to a set of test data to asses how anomaly the particular data set is. The typical days identified by Orca were used as the reference/training set for IMS, while all the other days were passed through IMS resulting in an anomaly score profile for each day. The mean of the IMS score profile was then calculated for each day to produce a summary IMS score. These summary scores were ranked and the top outliers were identified (see Figure 1). Once the anomalies were identified the contributing parameters were then ranked by the algorithm. Analysis: The contributing parameters identified by IMS were localized to the return air temperature duct system. -7/03/09 (Figure 2 & 3) AHU-1 Return Air Temperature (RAT) Calculated Average Return Air Temperature -7/19/09 (Figure 3 & 4) AHU-2 Return Air Temperature (RAT) Calculated Average Return Air Temperature IMS identified significantly higher temperatures compared to other days during the month of July and August. Conclusion: The proposed algorithms Orca and IMS have shown that they were able to pick up significant anomalies in the building system as well as diagnose the anomaly by identifying the sensor values that were anomalous. In the future these methods can be used on live streaming data and produce a real time anomaly score to help building maintenance with detection and diagnosis of problems.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
As an important technique for data pre-processing, outlier detection plays a crucial role in various real applications and has gained substantial attention, especially in medical fields. Despite the importance of outlier detection, many existing methods are vulnerable to the distribution of outliers and require prior knowledge, such as the outlier proportion. To address this problem to some extent, this article proposes an adaptive mini-minimum spanning tree-based outlier detection (MMOD) method, which utilizes a novel distance measure by scaling the Euclidean distance. For datasets containing different densities and taking on different shapes, our method can identify outliers without prior knowledge of outlier percentages. The results on both real-world medical data corpora and intuitive synthetic datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method compared to state-of-the-art methods.
DISTRIBUTED ANOMALY DETECTION USING SATELLITE DATA FROM MULTIPLE MODALITIES KANISHKA BHADURI*, KAMALIKA DAS**, AND PETR VOTAVA*** Abstract. There has been a tremendous increase in the volume of Earth Science data over the last decade from modern satellites, in-situ sensors and different climate models. All these datasets need to be co-analyzed for finding interesting patterns or for searching for extremes or outliers. Information extraction from such rich data sources using advanced data mining methodologies is a challenging task not only due to the massive volume of data, but also because these datasets ate physically stored at different geographical locations. Moving these petabytes of data over the network to a single location may waste a lot of bandwidth, and can take days to finish. To solve this problem, in this paper, we present a novel algorithm which can identify outliers in the global data without moving all the data to one location. The algorithm is highly accurate (close to 99%) and requires centralizing less than 5% of the entire dataset. We demonstrate the performance of the algorithm using data obtained from the NASA MODerate-resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) satellite images.
In the present era of large-scale surveys, big data present new challenges to the discovery process for anomalous data. Such data can be indicative of systematic errors, extreme (or rare) forms of known phenomena, or most interestingly, truly novel phenomena that exhibit as-of-yet unobserved behaviours. In this work, we present an outlier scoring methodology to identify and characterize the most promising unusual sources to facilitate discoveries of such anomalous data. We have developed a data mining method based on k-nearest neighbour distance in feature space to efficiently identify the most anomalous light curves. We test variations of this method including using principal components of the feature space, removing select features, the effect of the choice of k, and scoring to subset samples. We evaluate the performance of our scoring on known object classes and find that our scoring consistently scores rare (<1000) object classes higher than common classes. We have applied scoring to all long cadence light curves of Quarters 1-17 of Kepler's prime mission and present outlier scores for all 2.8 million light curves for the roughly 200k objects.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Here we present a dataset, MNIST4OD, of large size (number of dimensions and number of instances) suitable for Outliers Detection task.The dataset is based on the famous MNIST dataset (http://yann.lecun.com/exdb/mnist/).We build MNIST4OD in the following way:To distinguish between outliers and inliers, we choose the images belonging to a digit as inliers (e.g. digit 1) and we sample with uniform probability on the remaining images as outliers such as their number is equal to 10% of that of inliers. We repeat this dataset generation process for all digits. For implementation simplicity we then flatten the images (28 X 28) into vectors.Each file MNIST_x.csv.gz contains the corresponding dataset where the inlier class is equal to x.The data contains one instance (vector) in each line where the last column represents the outlier label (yes/no) of the data point. The data contains also a column which indicates the original image class (0-9).See the following numbers for a complete list of the statistics of each datasets ( Name | Instances | Dimensions | Number of Outliers in % ):MNIST_0 | 7594 | 784 | 10MNIST_1 | 8665 | 784 | 10MNIST_2 | 7689 | 784 | 10MNIST_3 | 7856 | 784 | 10MNIST_4 | 7507 | 784 | 10MNIST_5 | 6945 | 784 | 10MNIST_6 | 7564 | 784 | 10MNIST_7 | 8023 | 784 | 10MNIST_8 | 7508 | 784 | 10MNIST_9 | 7654 | 784 | 10