Dataset Card for example-preference-dataset

This dataset has been created with distilabel.

  Dataset Summary

This dataset contains a pipeline.yaml which can be used to reproduce the pipeline that generated it in distilabel using the distilabel CLI: distilabel pipeline run --config "https://huggingface.co/datasets/sdiazlor/example-preference-dataset/raw/main/pipeline.yaml"

or explore the configuration: distilabel pipeline info --config… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/distilabel-internal-testing/example-generate-preference-dataset.

Motivation

This dataset was created to pilot techniques for creating synthetic data from datasets containing sensitive and protected information in the local government context. Synthetic data generation replaces actual data with representative data generated from statistical models; this preserves the key data properties that allow insights to be drawn from the data while protecting the privacy of the people included in the data. We invite you to read the Understanding Synthetic Data white paper for a concise introduction to synthetic data.

This effort was a collaboration of the Urban Institute, Allegheny County’s Department of Human Services (DHS) and CountyStat, and the University of Pittsburgh’s Western Pennsylvania Regional Data Center.

Collection

The source data for this project consisted of 1) month-by-month records of services included in Allegheny County's data warehouse and 2) demographic data about the individuals who received the services. As the County’s data warehouse combines this service and client data, this data is referred to as “Integrated Services data”. Read more about the data warehouse and the kinds of services it includes here.

Preprocessing

Synthetic data are typically generated from probability distributions or models identified as being representative of the confidential data. For this dataset, a model of the Integrated Services data was used to generate multiple versions of the synthetic dataset. These different candidate datasets were evaluated to select for publication the dataset version that best balances utility and privacy. For high-level information about this evaluation, see the Synthetic Data User Guide.

For more information about the creation of the synthetic version of this data, see the technical brief for this project, which discusses the technical decision making and modeling process in more detail.

Recommended Uses

This disaggregated synthetic data allows for many analyses that are not possible with aggregate data (summary statistics). Broadly, this synthetic version of this data could be analyzed to better understand the usage of human services by people in Allegheny County, including the interplay in the usage of multiple services and demographic information about clients.

Known Limitations/Biases

Some amount of deviation from the original data is inherent to the synthetic data generation process. Specific examples of limitations (including undercounts and overcounts for the usage of different services) are given in the Synthetic Data User Guide and the technical report describing this dataset's creation.

Feedback

Please reach out to this dataset's data steward (listed below) to let us know how you are using this data and if you found it to be helpful. Please also provide any feedback on how to make this dataset more applicable to your work, any suggestions of future synthetic datasets, or any additional information that would make this more useful. Also, please copy wprdc@pitt.edu on any such feedback (as the WPRDC always loves to hear about how people use the data that they publish and how the data could be improved).

Further Documentation and Resources

1) A high-level overview of synthetic data generation as a method for protecting privacy can be found in the Understanding Synthetic Data white paper.
2) The Synthetic Data User Guide provides high-level information to help users understand the motivation, evaluation process, and limitations of the synthetic version of Allegheny County DHS's Human Services data published here.
3) Generating a Fully Synthetic Human Services Dataset: A Technical Report on Synthesis and Evaluation Methodologies describes the full technical methodology used for generating the synthetic data, evaluating the various options, and selecting the final candidate for publication.
4) The WPRDC also hosts the Allegheny County Human Services Community Profiles dataset, which provides annual updates on human-services usage, aggregated by neighborhood/municipality. That data can be explored using the County's Human Services Community Profile web site.

This training data was generated using GPT-4o as part of the 'Drawing with LLM' competition (https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/drawing-with-llms). It can be used to fine-tune small language models for the competition or serve as an augmentation dataset alongside other data sources.

The dataset is generated in two steps using the GPT-4o model. - In the first step, topic descriptions relevant to the competition are generated using a specific prompt. By running this prompt multiple times, over 3,000 descriptions were collected.

 
prompt=f""" I am participating in an SVG code generation competition.
  
   The competition involves generating SVG images based on short textual descriptions of everyday objects and scenes, spanning a wide range of categories. The key guidelines are as follows:
  
   - Descriptions are generic and do not contain brand names, trademarks, or personal names.
   - No descriptions include people, even in generic terms.
   - Descriptions are concise—each is no more than 200 characters, with an average length of about 50 characters.
   - Categories cover various domains, with some overlap between public and private test sets.
  
   To train a small LLM model, I am preparing a synthetic dataset. Could you generate 100 unique topics aligned with the competition style?
  
   Requirements:
   - Each topic should range between **20 and 200 characters**, with an **average around 60 characters**.
   - Ensure **diversity and creativity** across topics.
   - **50% of the topics** should come from the categories of **landscapes**, **abstract art**, and **fashion**.
   - Avoid duplication or overly similar phrasing.
  
   Example topics:
                 a purple forest at dusk, gray wool coat with a faux fur collar, a lighthouse overlooking the ocean, burgundy corduroy, pants with patch pockets and silver buttons, orange corduroy overalls, a purple silk scarf with tassel trim, a green lagoon under a cloudy sky, crimson rectangles forming a chaotic grid,  purple pyramids spiraling around a bronze cone, magenta trapezoids layered on a translucent silver sheet,  a snowy plain, black and white checkered pants,  a starlit night over snow-covered peaks, khaki triangles and azure crescents,  a maroon dodecahedron interwoven with teal threads.
  
   Please return the 100 topics in csv format.
   """
 

• In the second step, SVG code is generated by prompting the GPT-4o model. The following prompt is used to query the model to generate svg.

 
  prompt = f"""
      Generate SVG code to visually represent the following text description, while respecting the given constraints.
      
      Allowed Elements: `svg`, `path`, `circle`, `rect`, `ellipse`, `line`, `polyline`, `polygon`, `g`, `linearGradient`, `radialGradient`, `stop`, `defs`
      Allowed Attributes: `viewBox`, `width`, `height`, `fill`, `stroke`, `stroke-width`, `d`, `cx`, `cy`, `r`, `x`, `y`, `rx`, `ry`, `x1`, `y1`, `x2`, `y2`, `points`, `transform`, `opacity`
      

      Please ensure that the generated SVG code is well-formed, valid, and strictly adheres to these constraints. 
      Focus on a clear and concise representation of the input description within the given limitations. 
      Always give the complete SVG code with nothing omitted. Never use an ellipsis.

      The code is scored based on similarity to the description, Visual question anwering and aesthetic components.
      Please generate a detailed svg code accordingly.

      input description: {text}
      """
 

The raw SVG output is then cleaned and sanitized using a competition-specific sanitization class. After that, the cleaned SVG is scored using the SigLIP model to evaluate text-to-SVG similarity. Only SVGs with a score above 0.5 are included in the dataset. On average, out of three SVG generations, only one meets the quality threshold after the cleaning, sanitization, and scoring process.

Data Description

We release the synthetic data generated using the method described in the paper Knowledge-Infused Prompting: Assessing and Advancing Clinical Text Data Generation with Large Language Models (ACL 2024 Findings). The external knowledge we use is based on LLM-generated topics and writing styles.

  Generated Datasets

The original train/validation/test data, and the generated synthetic training data are listed as follows. For each dataset, we generate 5000… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/ritaranx/clinical-synthetic-text-llm.

Compilation of python codes for data preprocessing and VegeNet building, as well as image datasets (zip files).

Image datasets:

1. vege_original : Images of vegetables captured manually in data acquisition stage
2. vege_cropped_renamed : Images in (1) cropped to remove background areas and image labels renamed
3. non-vege images : Images of non-vegetable foods for CNN network to recognize other-than-vegetable foods
4. food_image_dataset : Complete set of vege (2) and non-vege (3) images for architecture building.
5. food_image_dataset_split : Image dataset (4) split into train and test sets
6. process : Images created when cropping (pre-processing step) to create dataset (2).

About this dataset

This dataset contains 6,000 example images generated with the process described in Roboflow's How to Create a Synthetic Dataset tutorial.

The images are composed of a background (randomly selected from Google's Open Images dataset) and a number of fruits (from Horea94's Fruit Classification Dataset) superimposed on top with a random orientation, scale, and color transformation. All images are 416x550 to simulate a smartphone aspect ratio.

To generate your own images, follow our tutorial or download the code.

Example: https://blog.roboflow.ai/content/images/2020/04/synthetic-fruit-examples.jpg" alt="Example Image">

Test Data Generation Tools Market Outlook

The global market size for Test Data Generation Tools was valued at USD 800 million in 2023 and is projected to reach USD 2.2 billion by 2032, growing at a CAGR of 12.1% during the forecast period. The surge in the adoption of agile and DevOps practices, along with the increasing complexity of software applications, is driving the growth of this market.

One of the primary growth factors for the Test Data Generation Tools market is the increasing need for high-quality test data in software development. As businesses shift towards more agile and DevOps methodologies, the demand for automated and efficient test data generation solutions has surged. These tools help in reducing the time required for test data creation, thereby accelerating the overall software development lifecycle. Additionally, the rise in digital transformation across various industries has necessitated the need for robust testing frameworks, further propelling the market growth.

The proliferation of big data and the growing emphasis on data privacy and security are also significant contributors to market expansion. With the introduction of stringent regulations like GDPR and CCPA, organizations are compelled to ensure that their test data is compliant with these laws. Test Data Generation Tools that offer features like data masking and data subsetting are increasingly being adopted to address these compliance requirements. Furthermore, the increasing instances of data breaches have underscored the importance of using synthetic data for testing purposes, thereby driving the demand for these tools.

Another critical growth factor is the technological advancements in artificial intelligence and machine learning. These technologies have revolutionized the field of test data generation by enabling the creation of more realistic and comprehensive test data sets. Machine learning algorithms can analyze large datasets to generate synthetic data that closely mimics real-world data, thus enhancing the effectiveness of software testing. This aspect has made AI and ML-powered test data generation tools highly sought after in the market.

Regional outlook for the Test Data Generation Tools market shows promising growth across various regions. North America is expected to hold the largest market share due to the early adoption of advanced technologies and the presence of major software companies. Europe is also anticipated to witness significant growth owing to strict regulatory requirements and increased focus on data security. The Asia Pacific region is projected to grow at the highest CAGR, driven by rapid industrialization and the growing IT sector in countries like India and China.

Synthetic Data Generation has emerged as a pivotal component in the realm of test data generation tools. This process involves creating artificial data that closely resembles real-world data, without compromising on privacy or security. The ability to generate synthetic data is particularly beneficial in scenarios where access to real data is restricted due to privacy concerns or regulatory constraints. By leveraging synthetic data, organizations can perform comprehensive testing without the risk of exposing sensitive information. This not only ensures compliance with data protection regulations but also enhances the overall quality and reliability of software applications. As the demand for privacy-compliant testing solutions grows, synthetic data generation is becoming an indispensable tool in the software development lifecycle.

Component Analysis

The Test Data Generation Tools market is segmented into software and services. The software segment is expected to dominate the market throughout the forecast period. This dominance can be attributed to the increasing adoption of automated testing tools and the growing need for robust test data management solutions. Software tools offer a wide range of functionalities, including data profiling, data masking, and data subsetting, which are essential for effective software testing. The continuous advancements in software capabilities also contribute to the growth of this segment.

In contrast, the services segment, although smaller in market share, is expected to grow at a substantial rate. Services include consulting, implementation, and support services, which are crucial for the successful deployment and management of test data generation tools. The increasing complexity of IT inf

This dataset showcases the diversity of labeled synthetic data you can generate with our tools to accelerate your computer vision projects. It includes: 85 synthetic RGB images as well as annotated versions with instance and semantic segmentation

We have massive indoor scene datasets and all for free.Visit our website for details.Or get in touch with our team and we can build one tailored to your specific requirements. xinxuan@qunhemail.com

Title: Rule-based Synthetic Data for Japanese GEC. Dataset Contents:This dataset contains two parallel corpora intended for the training and evaluating of models for the NLP (natural language processing) subtask of Japanese GEC (grammatical error correction). These are as follows:Synthetic Corpus - synthesized_data.tsv. This corpus file contains 2,179,130 parallel sentence pairs synthesized using the process described in [1]. Each line of the file consists of two sentences delimited by a tab. The first sentence is the erroneous sentence while the second is the corresponding correction.These paired sentences are derived from data scraped from the keyword-lookup site

This clean dataset is a refined version of our company datasets, consisting of 35M+ data records.

It’s an excellent data solution for companies with limited data engineering capabilities and those who want to reduce their time to value. You get filtered, cleaned, unified, and standardized B2B data. After cleaning, this data is also enriched by leveraging a carefully instructed large language model (LLM).

AI-powered data enrichment offers more accurate information in key data fields, such as company descriptions. It also produces over 20 additional data points that are very valuable to B2B businesses. Enhancing and highlighting the most important information in web data contributes to quicker time to value, making data processing much faster and easier.

For your convenience, you can choose from multiple data formats (Parquet, JSON, JSONL, or CSV) and select suitable delivery frequency (quarterly, monthly, or weekly).

Coresignal is a leading public business data provider in the web data sphere with an extensive focus on firmographic data and public employee profiles. More than 3B data records in different categories enable companies to build data-driven products and generate actionable insights. Coresignal is exceptional in terms of data freshness, with 890M+ records updated monthly for unprecedented accuracy and relevance.

Welcome to the Telugu Chain of Thought prompt-response dataset, a meticulously curated collection containing 3000 comprehensive prompt and response pairs. This dataset is an invaluable resource for training Language Models (LMs) to generate well-reasoned answers and minimize inaccuracies. Its primary utility lies in enhancing LLMs' reasoning skills for solving arithmetic, common sense, symbolic reasoning, and complex problems. Dataset Content: This COT dataset comprises a diverse set of instructions and questions paired with corresponding answers and rationales in the Telugu language. These prompts and completions cover a broad range of topics and questions, including mathematical concepts, common sense reasoning, complex problem-solving, scientific inquiries, puzzles, and more. Each prompt is meticulously accompanied by a response and rationale, providing essential information and insights to enhance the language model training process. These prompts, completions, and rationales were manually curated by native Telugu people, drawing references from various sources, including open-source datasets, news articles, websites, and other reliable references. Our chain-of-thought prompt-completion dataset includes various prompt types, such as instructional prompts, continuations, and in-context learning (zero-shot, few-shot) prompts. Additionally, the dataset contains prompts and completions enriched with various forms of rich text, such as lists, tables, code snippets, JSON, and more, with proper markdown format. Prompt Diversity: To ensure a wide-ranging dataset, we have included prompts from a plethora of topics related to mathematics, common sense reasoning, and symbolic reasoning. These topics encompass arithmetic, percentages, ratios, geometry, analogies, spatial reasoning, temporal reasoning, logic puzzles, patterns, and sequences, among others. These prompts vary in complexity, spanning easy, medium, and hard levels. Various question types are included, such as multiple-choice, direct queries, and true/false assessments. Response Formats: To accommodate diverse learning experiences, our dataset incorporates different types of answers depending on the prompt and provides step-by-step rationales. The detailed rationale aids the language model in building reasoning process for complex questions. These responses encompass text strings, numerical values, and date and time formats, enhancing the language model's ability to generate reliable, coherent, and contextually appropriate answers. Data Format and Annotation Details: This fully labeled Telugu Chain of Thought Prompt Completion Dataset is available in JSON and CSV formats. It includes annotation details such as a unique ID, prompt, prompt type, prompt complexity, prompt category, domain, response, rationale, response type, and rich text presence. Quality and Accuracy: Our dataset upholds the highest standards of quality and accuracy. Each prompt undergoes meticulous validation, and the corresponding responses and rationales are thoroughly verified. We prioritize inclusivity, ensuring that the dataset incorporates prompts and completions representing diverse perspectives and writing styles, maintaining an unbiased and discrimination-free stance. The Telugu version is grammatically accurate without any spelling or grammatical errors. No copyrighted, toxic, or harmful content is used during the construction of this dataset. Continuous Updates and Customization: The entire dataset was prepared with the assistance of human curators from the FutureBeeAI crowd community. Ongoing efforts are made to add more assets to this dataset, ensuring its growth and relevance. Additionally, FutureBeeAI offers the ability to gather custom chain of thought prompt completion data tailored to specific needs, providing flexibility and customization options. License: The dataset, created by FutureBeeAI, is now available for commercial use. Researchers, data scientists, and developers can leverage this fully labeled and ready-to-deploy Telugu Chain of Thought Prompt Completion Dataset to enhance the rationale and accurate response generation capabilities of their generative AI models and explore new approaches to NLP tasks.

The CREATE database is composed of 14 hours of multimodal recordings from a mobile robotic platform based on the iRobot Create.

Unlock the power of ready-to-use data sourced from developer communities and repositories with Developer Community and Code Datasets.

Data Sources:

1. GitHub: Access comprehensive data about GitHub repositories, developer profiles, contributions, issues, social interactions, and more.

2. StackShare: Receive information about companies, their technology stacks, reviews, tools, services, trends, and more.

3. DockerHub: Dive into data from container images, repositories, developer profiles, contributions, usage statistics, and more.

Developer Community and Code Datasets are a treasure trove of public data points gathered from tech communities and code repositories across the web.

With our datasets, you'll receive:

• Usernames;
• Companies;
• Locations;
• Job Titles;
• Follower Counts;
• Contact Details;
• Employability Statuses;
• And More.

Choose from various output formats, storage options, and delivery frequencies:

• Get datasets in CSV, JSON, or other preferred formats.
• Opt for data delivery via SFTP or directly to your cloud storage, such as AWS S3.
• Receive datasets either once or as per your agreed-upon schedule.

Why choose our Datasets?

1. Fresh and accurate data: Access complete, clean, and structured data from scraping professionals, ensuring the highest quality.

2. Time and resource savings: Let us handle data extraction and processing cost-effectively, freeing your resources for strategic tasks.

3. Customized solutions: Share your unique data needs, and we'll tailor our data harvesting approach to fit your requirements perfectly.

4. Legal compliance: Partner with a trusted leader in ethical data collection. Oxylabs is trusted by Fortune 500 companies and adheres to GDPR and CCPA standards.

Pricing Options:

Standard Datasets: choose from various ready-to-use datasets with standardized data schemas, priced from $1,000/month.

Custom Datasets: Tailor datasets from any public web domain to your unique business needs. Contact our sales team for custom pricing.

Experience a seamless journey with Oxylabs:

• Understanding your data needs: We work closely to understand your business nature and daily operations, defining your unique data requirements.
• Developing a customized solution: Our experts create a custom framework to extract public data using our in-house web scraping infrastructure.
• Delivering data sample: We provide a sample for your feedback on data quality and the entire delivery process.
• Continuous data delivery: We continuously collect public data and deliver custom datasets per the agreed frequency.

Empower your data-driven decisions with Oxylabs Developer Community and Code Datasets!

Abstract

The dataset is a relational dataset of 8,000 households households, representing a sample of the population of an imaginary middle-income country. The dataset contains two data files: one with variables at the household level, the other one with variables at the individual level. It includes variables that are typically collected in population censuses (demography, education, occupation, dwelling characteristics, fertility, mortality, and migration) and in household surveys (household expenditure, anthropometric data for children, assets ownership). The data only includes ordinary households (no community households). The dataset was created using REaLTabFormer, a model that leverages deep learning methods. The dataset was created for the purpose of training and simulation and is not intended to be representative of any specific country.

The full-population dataset (with about 10 million individuals) is also distributed as open data.

Geographic coverage

The dataset is a synthetic dataset for an imaginary country. It was created to represent the population of this country by province (equivalent to admin1) and by urban/rural areas of residence.

Analysis unit

Household, Individual

Universe

The dataset is a fully-synthetic dataset representative of the resident population of ordinary households for an imaginary middle-income country.

Kind of data

ssd

Sampling procedure

The sample size was set to 8,000 households. The fixed number of households to be selected from each enumeration area was set to 25. In a first stage, the number of enumeration areas to be selected in each stratum was calculated, proportional to the size of each stratum (stratification by geo_1 and urban/rural). Then 25 households were randomly selected within each enumeration area. The R script used to draw the sample is provided as an external resource.

Mode of data collection

other

Research instrument

The dataset is a synthetic dataset. Although the variables it contains are variables typically collected from sample surveys or population censuses, no questionnaire is available for this dataset. A "fake" questionnaire was however created for the sample dataset extracted from this dataset, to be used as training material.

Cleaning operations

The synthetic data generation process included a set of "validators" (consistency checks, based on which synthetic observation were assessed and rejected/replaced when needed). Also, some post-processing was applied to the data to result in the distributed data files.

Response rate

This is a synthetic dataset; the "response rate" is 100%.

The Delta Produce Sources Study was an observational study designed to measure and compare food environments of farmers markets (n=3) and grocery stores (n=12) in 5 rural towns located in the Lower Mississippi Delta region of Mississippi. Data were collected via electronic surveys from June 2019 to March 2020 using a modified version of the Nutrition Environment Measures Survey (NEMS) Farmers Market Audit tool. The tool was modified to collect information pertaining to source of fresh produce and also for use with both farmers markets and grocery stores. Availability, source, quality, and price information were collected and compared between farmers markets and grocery stores for 13 fresh fruits and 32 fresh vegetables via SAS software programming. Because the towns were not randomly selected and the sample sizes are relatively small, the data may not be generalizable to all rural towns in the Lower Mississippi Delta region of Mississippi. Resources in this dataset:Resource Title: Delta Produce Sources Study dataset . File Name: DPS Data Public.csvResource Description: The dataset contains variables corresponding to availability, source (country, state and town if country is the United States), quality, and price (by weight or volume) of 13 fresh fruits and 32 fresh vegetables sold in farmers markets and grocery stores located in 5 Lower Mississippi Delta towns.Resource Software Recommended: Microsoft Excel,url: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/excel Resource Title: Delta Produce Sources Study data dictionary. File Name: DPS Data Dictionary Public.csvResource Description: This file is the data dictionary corresponding to the Delta Produce Sources Study dataset.Resource Software Recommended: Microsoft Excel,url: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/excel

Dataset Card for my-dataset-generate

This dataset has been created with distilabel.

  Dataset Summary

This dataset contains a pipeline.yaml which can be used to reproduce the pipeline that generated it in distilabel using the distilabel CLI: distilabel pipeline run --config "https://huggingface.co/datasets/Bipul8765/my-dataset-generate/raw/main/pipeline.yaml"

or explore the configuration: distilabel pipeline info --config… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/Bipul8765/my-dataset-generate.

hltcoe/Generate-Distill-Data dataset hosted on Hugging Face and contributed by the HF Datasets community

The dataset contains two images taken at two wavelength (blue and red) of human metaphasic chromosomes (DAPI stained) hybridized with a Cy3 labelled telomeric probe. The two images can be combined into a color image. The previous dataset of overlapping chromosomes was generated chromosomes belonging to this metaphase.

The Synthetic Data Software market is experiencing robust growth, driven by increasing demand for data privacy regulations compliance and the need for large, high-quality datasets for AI/ML model training. The market size in 2025 is estimated at $2.5 billion, demonstrating significant expansion from its 2019 value. This growth is projected to continue at a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 25% from 2025 to 2033, reaching an estimated market value of $15 billion by 2033. This expansion is fueled by several key factors. Firstly, the increasing stringency of data privacy regulations, such as GDPR and CCPA, is restricting the use of real-world data in many applications. Synthetic data offers a viable solution by providing realistic yet privacy-preserving alternatives. Secondly, the booming AI and machine learning sectors heavily rely on massive datasets for training effective models. Synthetic data can generate these datasets on demand, reducing the cost and time associated with data collection and preparation. Finally, the growing adoption of synthetic data across various sectors, including healthcare, finance, and retail, further contributes to market expansion. The diverse applications and benefits are accelerating the adoption rate in a multitude of industries needing advanced analytics. The market segmentation reveals strong growth across cloud-based solutions and the key application segments of healthcare, finance (BFSI), and retail/e-commerce. While on-premises solutions still hold a segment of the market, the cloud-based approach's scalability and cost-effectiveness are driving its dominance. Geographically, North America currently holds the largest market share, but significant growth is anticipated in the Asia-Pacific region due to increasing digitalization and the presence of major technology hubs. The market faces certain restraints, including challenges related to data quality and the need for improved algorithms to generate truly representative synthetic data. However, ongoing innovation and investment in this field are mitigating these limitations, paving the way for sustained market growth. The competitive landscape is dynamic, with numerous established players and emerging startups contributing to the market's evolution.

What’s Included

The English Open-Ended Question Answering Dataset is a meticulously curated collection of comprehensive Question-Answer pairs. It serves as a valuable resource for training Large Language Models (LLMs) and Question-answering models in the English language, advancing the field of artificial intelligence.

Each question is accompanied by an answer, providing valuable information and insights to enhance the language model training process. Both the questions and answers were manually curated by native English Speaking people, and references were taken from diverse sources like books, news articles, websites, and other reliable references.

This question-answer prompt completion dataset contains different types of prompts, including instruction type, continuation type, and in-context learning (zero-shot, few-shot) type. The dataset also contains questions and answers with different types of rich text, including tables, code, JSON, etc., with proper markdown.

Both the question and answers in English are grammatically accurate without any word or grammatical errors. No copyrighted, toxic, or harmful content is used while building this dataset.