The Maternity Indicators Data Set captures data relating to the woman at initial assessment and to mother and baby (or babies) for all births. This relates to initial assessment and birth activity undertaken in Wales only.

Abstract: This data shows the model nodes, indicating water level only and/or flow and water levels along the centre-line of rivers that have been modelled to generate the CFRAM flood maps. The nodes estimate maximum design event flood flows and maximum flood levels. Flood event probabilities are referred to in terms of a percentage Annual Exceedance Probability, or ‘AEP’. This represents the probability of an event of this, or greater, severity occurring in any given year. These probabilities may also be expressed as odds (e.g. 100 to 1) of the event occurring in any given year. They are also commonly referred to in terms of a return period (e.g. the 100-year flood), although this period is not the length of time that will elapse between two such events occurring, as, although unlikely, two very severe events may occur within a short space of time. The following sets out a range of flood event probabilities for which fluvial and coastal flood maps are typically developed, expressed in terms of Annual Exceedance Probability (AEP), and identifies their parallels under other forms of expression: 10% (High Probability) Annual Exceedance Probability which can also be expressed as the 10 Year Return Period and as a 10:1 odds of occurrence in any given year. 1% (Medium Probability - Fluvail/River Flood Maps) Annual Exceedance Probability which can also be expressed as the 100 Year Return Period and as 100:1 odds of occurrence in any given year. 0.5% (Medium Probability - Coastal Flood Maps) Annual Exceedance Probability which can also be expressed as the 200 Year Return Period and as 200:1 odds of occurrence in any given year. 0.1% (Low Probability) Annual Exceedance Probability which can also be expressed as the 1000 Year Return Period and as 1000:1 odds of occurrence in any given year. The Mid-Range Future Scenario extents where generated taking in in the potential effects of climate change using an increase in rainfall of 20% and sea level rise of 500mm (20 inches). Data has been produced for the 'Areas of Further Assessment' (AFAs), as required by the EU 'Floods' Directive [2007/60/EC] and designated under the Preliminary Flood Risk Assessment, and also for other reaches between the AFAs and down to the sea that are referred to as 'Medium Priority Watercourses' (MPWs). River reaches that have been modelled are indicated by the CFRAM Modelled River Centrelines dataset. Flooding from other reaches of river may occur, but has not been mapped, and so areas that are not shown as being within a flood extent may therefore be at risk of flooding from unmodelled rivers (as well as from other sources). The purpose of the Flood Maps is not to designate individual properties at risk of flooding. They are community-based maps. Lineage: Fluvial and coastal flood map data is developed using hydrodynamic modelling, based on calculated design river flows and extreme sea levels, surveyed channel cross-sections, in-bank / bank-side / coastal structures, Digital Terrain Models, and other relevant datasets (e.g. land use, data on past floods for model calibration, etc.). The process may vary for particular areas or maps. Technical Hydrology and Hydraulics Reports set out full technical details on the derivation of the flood maps. For fluvial flood levels, calibration and verification of the models make use of the best available data, including hydrometric records, photographs, videos, press articles and anecdotal information. Subject to the availability of suitable calibration data, models are verified in so far as possible to target vertical water level accuracies of approximately +/-0.2m for areas within the AFAs, and approximately +/-0.4m along the MPWs. For coastal flood levels, the accuracy of the predicted annual exceedance probability (AEP) of combined tide and surge levels depends on the accuracy of the various components used in deriving these levels i.e. accuracy of the tidal and surge model, the accuracy of the statistical data and the accuracy for the conversion from marine datum to land levelling datum. The output of the water level modelling, combined with the extreme value analysis undertaken as detailed above is generally within +/-0.2m for confidence limits of 95% at the 0.1% AEP. Higher probability (lower return period) events are expected to have tighter confidence limits. Purpose: The data has been developed to comply with the requirements of the European Communities (Assessment and Management of Flood Risks) Regulations 2010 to 2015 (the “Regulations”) (implementing Directive 2007/60/EC) for the purposes of establishing a framework for the assessment and management of flood risks, aiming at the reduction of adverse consequences for human health, the environment, cultural heritage and economic activity associated with floods.

CFRAM River Flood Extents - Mid-Range Future Scenario. Published by Office of Public Works. Available under the license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 (cc-by-nc-nd).Abstract: This data shows the modelled extent of land that might be flooded by rivers (fluvial flooding) during a theoretical or ‘design’ flood event with an estimated probability of occurrence, rather than information for actual floods that have occurred in the past. The extents have been developed taking account of effective flood defences.

Flood event probabilities are referred to in terms of a percentage Annual Exceedance Probability, or ‘AEP’. This represents the probability of an event of this, or greater, severity occurring in any given year. These probabilities may also be expressed as odds (e.g. 100 to 1) of the event occurring in any given year. They are also commonly referred to in terms of a return period (e.g. the 100-year flood), although this period is not the length of time that will elapse between two such events occurring, as, although unlikely, two very severe events may occur within a short space of time.

The following sets out a range of flood event probabilities for which fluvial and coastal flood maps are typically developed, expressed in terms of Annual Exceedance Probability (AEP), and identifies their parallels under other forms of expression: 10% (High Probability) Annual Exceedance Probability which can also be expressed as the 10 Year Return Period and as a 10:1 odds of occurrence in any given year. 1% (Medium Probability - Fluvial/River Flood Maps) Annual Exceedance Probability which can also be expressed as the 100 Year Return Period and as 100:1 odds of occurrence in any given year. 0.5% (Medium Probability - Coastal Flood Maps) Annual Exceedance Probability which can also be expressed as the 200 Year Return Period and as 200:1 odds of occurrence in any given year. 0.1% (Low Probability) Annual Exceedance Probability which can also be expressed as the 1000 Year Return Period and as 1000:1 odds of occurrence in any given year.

The Mid-Range Future Scenario extents where generated taking in in the potential effects of climate change using an increase in rainfall of 20% and sea level rise of 500mm (20 inches).

Data has been produced for the 'Areas of Further Assessment' (AFAs), as required by the EU 'Floods' Directive [2007/60/EC] and designated under the Preliminary Flood Risk Assessment, and also for other reaches between the AFAs and down to the sea that are referred to as 'Medium Priority Watercourses' (MPWs). River reaches that have been modelled are indicated by the CFRAM Modelled River Centrelines dataset.

Flooding from other reaches of river may occur, but has not been mapped, and so areas that are not shown as being within a flood extent may therefore be at risk of flooding from unmodelled rivers (as well as from other sources).

The purpose of the Flood Maps is not to designate individual properties at risk of flooding. They are community-based maps.

Lineage: Fluvial and coastal flood map data is developed using hydrodynamic modelling, based on calculated design river flows and extreme sea levels, surveyed channel cross-sections, in-bank / bank-side / coastal structures, Digital Terrain Models, and other relevant datasets (e.g. land use, data on past floods for model calibration, etc.).

The process may vary for particular areas or maps. Technical Hydrology and Hydraulics Reports set out full technical details on the derivation of the flood maps.

For fluvial flood levels, calibration and verification of the models make use of the best available data, including hydrometric records, photographs, videos, press articles and anecdotal information. Subject to the availability of suitable calibration data, models are verified in so far as possible to target vertical water level accuracies of approximately +/-0.2m for areas within the AFAs, and approximately +/-0.4m along the MPWs.

All fluvial models are run, and maps produced, assuming clear flow through culverts and bridges, and the models and flood maps do not account for blockage of such structures.

Flood levels, depths and velocities are derived from the hydrodynamic models for the various event probabilities and scenarios. Flood extents are derived from the raster flood depth maps and vectorised to produce the final vector outputs.

Purpose: The data has been developed to comply with the requirements of the European Communities (Assessment and Management of Flood Risks) Regulations 2010 to 2015 (the “Regulations”) (implementing Directive 2007/60/EC) for the purposes of establishing a framework for the assessment and management of flood risks, aiming at the reduction of adverse consequences for human health, the environment, cultural heritage and economic activity associated with floods....

CFRAM Coastal Flood Extents - Mid-Range Future Scenario. Published by Office of Public Works. Available under the license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 (cc-by-nc-nd).Abstract: This data shows the modelled extent of land that might be flooded by the sea (coastal flooding) during a theoretical or ‘design’ flood event with an estimated probability of occurrence, rather than information for actual floods that have occurred in the past. The extents have been developed taking account of effective flood defences.

Flood event probabilities are referred to in terms of a percentage Annual Exceedance Probability, or ‘AEP’. This represents the probability of an event of this, or greater, severity occurring in any given year. These probabilities may also be expressed as odds (e.g. 100 to 1) of the event occurring in any given year. They are also commonly referred to in terms of a return period (e.g. the 100-year flood), although this period is not the length of time that will elapse between two such events occurring, as, although unlikely, two very severe events may occur within a short space of time.

The following sets out a range of flood event probabilities for which fluvial and coastal flood maps are typically developed, expressed in terms of Annual Exceedance Probability (AEP), and identifies their parallels under other forms of expression: 10% (High Probability) Annual Exceedance Probability which can also be expressed as the 10 Year Return Period and as a 10:1 odds of occurrence in any given year. 1% (Medium Probability - Fluvial/River Flood Maps) Annual Exceedance Probability which can also be expressed as the 100 Year Return Period and as 100:1 odds of occurrence in any given year. 0.5% (Medium Probability - Coastal Flood Maps) Annual Exceedance Probability which can also be expressed as the 200 Year Return Period and as 200:1 odds of occurrence in any given year. 0.1% (Low Probability) Annual Exceedance Probability which can also be expressed as the 1000 Year Return Period and as 1000:1 odds of occurrence in any given year.

The Mid-Range Future Scenario extents where generated taking in in the potential effects of climate change using an increase in rainfall of 20% and sea level rise of 500mm (20 inches).

Data has been produced for the 'Areas of Further Assessment' (AFAs), as required by the EU 'Floods' Directive [2007/60/EC] and designated under the Preliminary Flood Risk Assessment, and also for other reaches between the AFAs and down to the sea that are referred to as 'Medium Priority Watercourses' (MPWs). River reaches that have been modelled are indicated by the CFRAM Modelled River Centrelines dataset.

Flooding from other reaches of river may occur, but has not been mapped, and so areas that are not shown as being within a flood extent may therefore be at risk of flooding from unmodelled rivers (as well as from other sources).

The purpose of the Flood Maps is not to designate individual properties at risk of flooding. They are community-based maps.

Lineage: Fluvial and coastal flood map data is developed using hydrodynamic modelling, based on calculated design river flows and extreme sea levels, surveyed channel cross-sections, in-bank / bank-side / coastal structures, Digital Terrain Models, and other relevant datasets (e.g. land use, data on past floods for model calibration, etc.).

The process may vary for particular areas or maps. Technical Hydrology and Hydraulics Reports set out full technical details on the derivation of the flood maps.

For coastal flood levels, the accuracy of the predicted annual exceedance probability (AEP) of combined tide and surge levels depends on the accuracy of the various components used in deriving these levels i.e. accuracy of the tidal and surge model, the accuracy of the statistical data and the accuracy for the conversion from marine datum to land levelling datum.

The output of the water level modelling, combined with the extreme value analysis undertaken as detailed above is generally within +/-0.2m for confidence limits of 95% at the 0.1% AEP. Higher probability (lower return period) events are expected to have tighter confidence limits.

Flood levels, depths and velocities are derived from the hydrodynamic models for the various event probabilities and scenarios. Flood extents are derived from the raster flood depth maps and vectorised to produce the final vector outputs.

Purpose: The data has been developed to comply with the requirements of the European Communities (Assessment and Management of Flood Risks) Regulations 2010 to 2015 (the “Regulations”) (implementing Directive 2007/60/EC) for the purposes of establishing a framework for the assessment and management of flood risks, aiming at the reduction of adverse consequences for human health, the environment, cultural heritage and economic activity associated with floods....

CFRAM Model Nodes - Mid-Range Future Scenario. Published by Office of Public Works. Available under the license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 (cc-by-nc-nd).Abstract: This data shows the model nodes, indicating water level only and/or flow and water levels along the centre-line of rivers that have been modelled to generate the CFRAM flood maps. The nodes estimate maximum design event flood flows and maximum flood levels.

Flood event probabilities are referred to in terms of a percentage Annual Exceedance Probability, or ‘AEP’. This represents the probability of an event of this, or greater, severity occurring in any given year. These probabilities may also be expressed as odds (e.g. 100 to 1) of the event occurring in any given year. They are also commonly referred to in terms of a return period (e.g. the 100-year flood), although this period is not the length of time that will elapse between two such events occurring, as, although unlikely, two very severe events may occur within a short space of time.

The following sets out a range of flood event probabilities for which fluvial and coastal flood maps are typically developed, expressed in terms of Annual Exceedance Probability (AEP), and identifies their parallels under other forms of expression: 10% (High Probability) Annual Exceedance Probability which can also be expressed as the 10 Year Return Period and as a 10:1 odds of occurrence in any given year. 1% (Medium Probability - Fluvail/River Flood Maps) Annual Exceedance Probability which can also be expressed as the 100 Year Return Period and as 100:1 odds of occurrence in any given year. 0.5% (Medium Probability - Coastal Flood Maps) Annual Exceedance Probability which can also be expressed as the 200 Year Return Period and as 200:1 odds of occurrence in any given year. 0.1% (Low Probability) Annual Exceedance Probability which can also be expressed as the 1000 Year Return Period and as 1000:1 odds of occurrence in any given year.

The Mid-Range Future Scenario extents where generated taking in in the potential effects of climate change using an increase in rainfall of 20% and sea level rise of 500mm (20 inches).

Data has been produced for the 'Areas of Further Assessment' (AFAs), as required by the EU 'Floods' Directive [2007/60/EC] and designated under the Preliminary Flood Risk Assessment, and also for other reaches between the AFAs and down to the sea that are referred to as 'Medium Priority Watercourses' (MPWs). River reaches that have been modelled are indicated by the CFRAM Modelled River Centrelines dataset.

Flooding from other reaches of river may occur, but has not been mapped, and so areas that are not shown as being within a flood extent may therefore be at risk of flooding from unmodelled rivers (as well as from other sources).

The purpose of the Flood Maps is not to designate individual properties at risk of flooding. They are community-based maps.

Lineage: Fluvial and coastal flood map data is developed using hydrodynamic modelling, based on calculated design river flows and extreme sea levels, surveyed channel cross-sections, in-bank / bank-side / coastal structures, Digital Terrain Models, and other relevant datasets (e.g. land use, data on past floods for model calibration, etc.).

The process may vary for particular areas or maps. Technical Hydrology and Hydraulics Reports set out full technical details on the derivation of the flood maps.

For fluvial flood levels, calibration and verification of the models make use of the best available data, including hydrometric records, photographs, videos, press articles and anecdotal information. Subject to the availability of suitable calibration data, models are verified in so far as possible to target vertical water level accuracies of approximately +/-0.2m for areas within the AFAs, and approximately +/-0.4m along the MPWs.

For coastal flood levels, the accuracy of the predicted annual exceedance probability (AEP) of combined tide and surge levels depends on the accuracy of the various components used in deriving these levels i.e. accuracy of the tidal and surge model, the accuracy of the statistical data and the accuracy for the conversion from marine datum to land levelling datum. The output of the water level modelling, combined with the extreme value analysis undertaken as detailed above is generally within +/-0.2m for confidence limits of 95% at the 0.1% AEP. Higher probability (lower return period) events are expected to have tighter confidence limits.

Purpose: The data has been developed to comply with the requirements of the European Communities (Assessment and Management of Flood Risks) Regulations 2010 to 2015 (the “Regulations”) (implementing Directive 2007/60/EC) for the purposes of establishing a framework for the assessment and management of flood risks, aiming at the reduction of adverse consequences for human health, the environment, cultural heritage and economic activity associated with floods....

This dataset is part of the ESA Data User Element (DUE) Permafrost Full Product Set (doi:10.1594/PANGAEA.780111).The Land Surface Temperature (LST) products and services identified by users for the pan-Arctic (25 km resolution) scales include weekly and monthly averages from 2000 to 2010 from which annual averages can also be calculated. The LST processing integrates the LST level 2 products from MODIS and AATSR distributed by NASA and ESA, respectively. Post-processing functions supply University Waterloo-level-3 weekly and monthly LST products for regional (1 km) and pan-Arctic (25 km) scales. Thepan-Arctic product, with a spatial resolution of 25 km, is produced by spatial averaging of 1-km observations. MOD11_L2 and MYD11_L2 LST (Version 5 from NASA Terra and Aqua satellites) and ATS_NR_2P (from ESA Envisat satellite) products at 1 km resolution are used as input data to generate pan-Arctic and regional products. The original geo-located LST observations are characterized by an irregular distribution based on the satellite orbits. The Northern Hemisphere EASE-Grid Lambert Equal Area Azimuthal projection with a sphere datum (with a radius of 6371.228 km) was selected as the standard projection for the operational pan-Arctic and regional products. Original MODIS and AATSR LST level 2 observations are projected using the EASE-Grid coordinate system and interpolated to a regular EASE-Grid with 1 km spacing using triangulation. The EASE-Grid projection was chosen since this is the system adopted by the GlobSnow project and for most snow and ice products distributed by NSIDC. Local time is calculated using UTC acquisition time and longitude. UTC is extracted from ADS information for AATSR data and from the file name of MODIS level 2 (Terra and Aqua) products, yielding a temporal accuracy of ± 15 minutes, which is found to be sufficient for weekly and monthly products. Temporal aggregation is applied to both 1 km and 25 km data to produce weekly and monthly LST averages. Interpolated LST observations on a 1 km grid (regional product) and 25 km (pan-Arctic product) are aggregated into two bins; a day-time bin (from 6 a.m. to 6 p.m. local time) and a night-time bin (6 p.m. to 6 a.m. of the next day) within the aggregation period (week or month). The definition of day and night does not take in account the notion of polar darkness and does not consider the seasonal changes of day length. It was defined to force final products to have an equal number of observations around the day. A mid range average is calculated by taking the day-time and night-time average to avoid daily diurnal fluctuations during the week or month of interest. Known issues: the LST data are all measured during clear-sky conditions. The influence of clouds on surface temperature (e.g. temperature warmer under clouds in winter) is not reflected in the LSTs. This makes the LST colder than in reality due to the isolative effect of clouds. Each LST file contains 6 bands: the datafiles 001 to 006, bands 001, 003, 005 are the LST averages and bands 002, 004, 006 are supplementary quality information: Bands with averages of LST: 001 - Weekly or monthly aggregated average LST product based on equal weight of average day-time (003) and night-time (005) LST values. 003 - Average day-time weekly or monthly LST based on all cloud free observations falling during 6 a.m. to 6 p.m. local time. 005 - Average night-time weekly or monthly LST based on all cloud free observations falling into each pixel cell during 6 p.m. to 6 a.m. local time. Supplementary information bands: 002 - Number of LST cloud free observations falling into each pixel for the aggregation (weekly or monthly) period. Associated with LST file 001. 004 - Number of LST cloud free observations during day-time (6 a.m. to 6 p.m. local time) falling into each pixel. Associated with LST file 003. 006 - Number of LST cloud free observations during night-time (6 p.m. to 6 a.m. local time) falling into each pixel. Associated with LST file 005.