The GAPs Data Repository provides a comprehensive overview of available qualitative and quantitative data on national return regimes, now accessible through an advanced web interface at https://data.returnmigration.eu/.

This updated guideline outlines the complete process, starting from the initial data collection for the return migration data repository to the development of a comprehensive web-based platform. Through iterative development, participatory approaches, and rigorous quality checks, we have ensured a systematic representation of return migration data at both national and comparative levels.

The Repository organizes data into five main categories, covering diverse aspects and offering a holistic view of return regimes: country profiles, legislation, infrastructure, international cooperation, and descriptive statistics. These categories, further divided into subcategories, are based on insights from a literature review, existing datasets, and empirical data collection from 14 countries. The selection of categories prioritizes relevance for understanding return and readmission policies and practices, data accessibility, reliability, clarity, and comparability. Raw data is meticulously collected by the national experts.

The transition to a web-based interface builds upon the Repository’s original structure, which was initially developed using REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture). It is a secure web application for building and managing online surveys and databases.The REDCAP ensures systematic data entries and store them on Uppsala University’s servers while significantly improving accessibility and usability as well as data security. It also enables users to export any or all data from the Project when granted full data export privileges. Data can be exported in various ways and formats, including Microsoft Excel, SAS, Stata, R, or SPSS for analysis. At this stage, the Data Repository design team also converted tailored records of available data into public reports accessible to anyone with a unique URL, without the need to log in to REDCap or obtain permission to access the GAPs Project Data Repository. Public reports can be used to share information with stakeholders or external partners without granting them access to the Project or requiring them to set up a personal account. Currently, all public report links inserted in this report are also available on the Repository’s webpage, allowing users to export original data.

This report also includes a detailed codebook to help users understand the structure, variables, and methodologies used in data collection and organization. This addition ensures transparency and provides a comprehensive framework for researchers and practitioners to effectively interpret the data.

The GAPs Data Repository is committed to providing accessible, well-organized, and reliable data by moving to a centralized web platform and incorporating advanced visuals. This Repository aims to contribute inputs for research, policy analysis, and evidence-based decision-making in the return and readmission field.

Explore the GAPs Data Repository at https://data.returnmigration.eu/.

The Current Population Survey Civic Engagement and Volunteering (CEV) Supplement is the most robust longitudinal survey about volunteerism and other forms of civic engagement in the United States. Produced by AmeriCorps in partnership with the U.S. Census Bureau, the CEV takes the pulse of our nation’s civic health every two years. The data on this page was collected in September 2023. The next wave of the CEV will be administered in September 2025.

The CEV can generate reliable estimates at the national level, within states and the District of Columbia, and in the largest twelve Metropolitan Statistical Areas to support evidence-based decision making and efforts to understand how people make a difference in communities across the country.

Click on "Export" to download and review an excerpt from the 2023 CEV Analytic Codebook that shows the variables available in the analytic CEV datasets produced by AmeriCorps.

Click on "Show More" to download and review the following 2023 CEV data and resources provided as attachments:

1) 2023 CEV Dataset Fact Sheet – brief summary of technical aspects of the 2023 CEV dataset. 2) CEV FAQs – answers to frequently asked technical questions about the CEV 3) Constructs and measures in the CEV 4) 2023 CEV Analytic Data and Setup Files – analytic dataset in Stata (.dta), R (.rdata), SPSS (.sav), and Excel (.csv) formats, codebook for analytic dataset, and Stata code (.do) to convert raw dataset to analytic formatting produced by AmeriCorps. These files were updated on January 16, 2025 to correct erroneous missing values for the ssupwgt variable. 5) 2023 CEV Technical Documentation – codebook for raw dataset and full supplement documentation produced by U.S. Census Bureau 6) 2023 CEV Raw Data and Read In Files – raw dataset in Stata (.dta) format, Stata code (.do) and dictionary file (.dct) to read ASCII dataset (.dat) into Stata using layout files (.lis)

General information: The data sets contain information on how often materials of studies available through GESIS: Data Archive for the Social Sciences were downloaded and/or ordered through one of the archive´s plattforms/services between 2004 and 2018.

Sources and plattforms: Study materials are accessible through various GESIS plattforms and services: Data Catalogue (DBK), histat, datorium, data service (and others).

Years available: - Data Catalogue: 2012-2018 - data service: 2006-2018 - datorium: 2014-2018 - histat: 2004-2018

Data sets: Data set ZA6899_Datasets_only_all_sources contains information on how often data files such as those with dta- (Stata) or sav- (SPSS) extension have been downloaded. Identification of data files is handled semi-automatically (depending on the plattform/serice). Multiple downloads of one file by the same user (identified through IP-address or username for registered users) on the same days are only counted as one download.

Data set ZA6899_Doc_and_Data_all_sources contains information on how often study materials have been downloaded. Multiple downloads of any file of the same study by the same user (identified through IP-address or username for registered users) on the same days are only counted as one download.

Both data sets are available in three formats: csv (quoted, semicolon-separated), dta (Stata v13, labeled) and sav (SPSS, labeled). All formats contain identical information.

Variables: Variables/columns in both data sets are identical. za_nr ´Archive study number´ version ´GESIS Archiv Version´ doi ´Digital Object Identifier´ StudyNo ´Study number of respective study´ Title ´English study title´ Title_DE ´German study title´ Access ´Access category (0, A, B, C, D, E)´ PubYear ´Publication year of last version of the study´ inZACAT ´Study is currently also available via ZACAT´ inHISTAT ´Study is currently also available via HISTAT´ inDownloads ´There are currently data files available for download for this study in DBK or datorium´ Total ´All downloads combined´ downloads_2004 ´downloads/orders from all sources combined in 2004´ [up to ...] downloads_2018 ´downloads/orders from all sources combined in 2018´ d_2004_dbk ´downloads from source dbk in 2004´ [up to ...] d_2018_dbk ´downloads from source dbk in 2018´ d_2004_histat ´downloads from source histat in 2004´ [up to ...] d_2018_histat ´downloads from source histat in 2018´ d_2004_dataservice ´downloads/orders from source dataservice in 2004´ [up to ...] d_2018_dataservice ´downloads/orders from source dataservice in 2018´

More information is available within the codebook.

The Current Population Survey Civic Engagement and Volunteering (CEV) Supplement is the most robust longitudinal survey about volunteerism and other forms of civic engagement in the United States. Produced by AmeriCorps in partnership with the U.S. Census Bureau, the CEV takes the pulse of our nation’s civic health every two years. The data on this page was collected in September 2021.

The CEV can generate reliable estimates at the national level, within states and the District of Columbia, and in the largest twelve Metropolitan Statistical Areas to support evidence-based decision making and efforts to understand how people make a difference in communities across the country.

Click on "Export" to download and review an excerpt from the 2021 CEV Analytic Codebook that shows the variables available in the analytic CEV datasets produced by AmeriCorps.

Click on "Show More" to download and review the following 2021 CEV data and resources provided as attachments:

1) 2021 CEV Dataset Fact Sheet – brief summary of technical aspects of the 2021 CEV dataset. 2) CEV FAQs – answers to frequently asked technical questions about the CEV 3) Constructs and measures in the CEV 4) 2021 CEV Analytic Data and Setup Files – analytic dataset in Stata (.dta), R (.rdata), SPSS (.sav), and Excel (.csv) formats, codebook for analytic dataset, and Stata code (.do) to convert raw dataset to analytic formatting produced by AmeriCorps. These files were updated on January 16, 2025 to correct erroneous missing values for the ssupwgt variable. 5) 2021 CEV Technical Documentation – codebook for raw dataset and full supplement documentation produced by U.S. Census Bureau 6) Nonresponse Bias Analysis produced by U.S. Census Bureau 7) 2021 CEV Raw Data and Read In Files – raw dataset in Stata (.dta) format, Stata code (.do) and dictionary file (.dct) to read ASCII dataset (.dat) into Stata using layout files (.lis)

Abstract

Abstract

Background: Adolescent girls in Kenya are disproportionately affected by early and unintended pregnancies, unsafe abortion and HIV infection. The In Their Hands (ITH) programme in Kenya aims to increase adolescents' use of high-quality sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services through targeted interventions. ITH Programme aims to promote use of contraception and testing for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) including HIV or pregnancy, for sexually active adolescent girls, 2) provide information, products and services on the adolescent girl's terms; and 3) promote communities support for girls and boys to access SRH services.

Objectives: The objectives of the evaluation are to assess: a) to what extent and how the new Adolescent Reproductive Health (ARH) partnership model and integrated system of delivery is working to meet its intended objectives and the needs of adolescents; b) adolescent user experiences across key quality dimensions and outcomes; c) how ITH programme has influenced adolescent voice, decision-making autonomy, power dynamics and provider accountability; d) how community support for adolescent reproductive and sexual health initiatives has changed as a result of this programme.

Methodology ITH programme is being implemented in two phases, a formative planning and experimentation in the first year from April 2017 to March 2018, and a national roll out and implementation from April 2018 to March 2020. This second phase is informed by an Annual Programme Review and thorough benchmarking and assessment which informed critical changes to performance and capacity so that ITH is fit for scale. It is expected that ITH will cover approximately 250,000 adolescent girls aged 15-19 in Kenya by April 2020. The programme is implemented by a consortium of Marie Stopes Kenya (MSK), Well Told Story, and Triggerise. ITH's key implementation strategies seek to increase adolescent motivation for service use, create a user-defined ecosystem and platform to provide girls with a network of accessible subsidized and discreet SRH services; and launch and sustain a national discourse campaign around adolescent sexuality and rights. The 3-year study will employ a mixed-methods approach with multiple data sources including secondary data, and qualitative and quantitative primary data with various stakeholders to explore their perceptions and attitudes towards adolescents SRH services. Quantitative data analysis will be done using STATA to provide descriptive statistics and statistical associations / correlations on key variables. All qualitative data will be analyzed using NVIVO software.

Study Duration: 36 months - between 2018 and 2020.

Geographic coverage

Homabay,Kakamega,Nakuru and Nairobi counties

Analysis unit

Private health facilities that provide T-safe services under the In Their Hands(ITH) Program.

Universe

1.Adolescent girls aged 15-19 who enrolled on the T-safe platform and received services and those who enrolled but did not receive services from the ITH facilities. 2.Service providers incharge of provision of T-safe services in the ITH facilities. 3.Mobilisers incharge of adolescent girls aged 15-19 recruitment into the T-safe program.

Sampling procedure

Qualitative Sampling

IDI participants were selected purposively from ITH intervention areas and facilities located in the four ITH intervention counties; Homa Bay, Nakuru, Kakamega and Nairobi respectively which were selected for the midline survey. Study participants were identified from selected intervention facilities. We interviewed one service provider of adolescent friendly ITH services per facility. Additionally, we conducted IDI's with adolescent girls' who were enrolled and using/had used the ITH platform to access reproductive health services or enrolled but may not have accessed the services for other reasons.

Sample coverage We successfully conducted a total of 122 In-depth Interviews with 54 adolescents enrolled on the T-Safe platform, including those who received services and those who were enrolled but did not receive services, 39 IDIS with service providers and 29 IDIs with mobilizers. The distribution per county included 51 IDI's in Nairobi City County (24 with adolescent girls, 17 with service providers and 10 with mobilisers), 15 IDI's in Nakuru County (2 with adolescent girls,8 with service providers and 5 with mobilisers), 34 IDI's in Homa Bay County (18 with adolescent girls,8 with service providers and 8 with mobilisers) and 22 IDI's in Kakamega County (10 with adolescent girls,6 with service providers and another 6 with mobilisers.)

Sampling deviation

N/A

Mode of data collection

Face-to-face [f2f]

Research instrument

The midline evaluation included qualitative in-depth interviews with adolescent T-Safe users, adolescents enrolled in the platform but did not use the services, providers and mobilizers to assess the adolescent user experience and quality of services as well as provider accountability under the T-Safe program. Generally,the aim of the qualitative study was to assess adolescents' T-Safe users experience across quality dimensions as well as provider's experiences and accountability. The dimensions assessed include adolescent's journey with the platforms, experience with the platform, perceptions of quality of services and how the ITH platforms changed provider behavior and accountability.

Adolescent in-depth interview included:Adolescent journey,Barriers to adolescents access to SRH services,Community attitudes towards adolescent use of contraceptives,Decision making,Factors influencing decision to visit a clinic,Motivating factors for girls to join ITH,Notable changes since the introduction of ITH,Parental support ,and Perceptions about T-Safe.

Service providers in-depth interview included;Personal and professional background,Provider's experience with ITH/T-safe platform,Notable changes/influences since the introduction of ITH/T-safe,Influence/Impact on the preference of adolescent service users and health care providers as a result of the program,Impact/influence of ITH on quality of care,Facilitators and barriers for adolescents to access SRH services,Mechanisms to address the barriers,Challenges related to the facility,Feedback about facility from adolescents,Types of support needed to improve SRH services provided to adolescents Scenarios of different clients accessing SRH services,and Free node.

Mobilisers in-depth interview included;Mobilizer responsibilities and designation,Job description,Motivation for joining ITH,Personal and professional background,Training,Mobilizer roles in ITH,Mobilization process ,Experience with ITH platform,Key messages shared with adolescent about ITH/ Tsafe during enrollment,Motivating factors for adolescents to join ITH/Tsafe,Community's attitude towards ITH/Tsafe,Challenges faced by mobilizers when mobilizing adolescents for Tsafe,Adolescents view regarding platform,Addressing the challenges ,andFree node

Cleaning operations

Qualitative interviews were audio-recorded and the audio recordings were transmitted to APHRC study team by uploading the audios to google drive which was only accessible to the team. Related interview notes, participant's description forms and Informed consent forms were transported to APHRC offices in Nairobi at the end of data collection where the data transcription and coding was conducted. Audio recordings from qualitative interviews were transcribed and saved in MS Word format. The transcripts were stored electronically in password protected computers and were only accessible to the evaluation team working on the project. A qualitative software analysis program (NVIVO) was used to assist in coding and analyzing the data. A “thematic analysis” approach was used to organize and analyze the data, and to assist in the development of a codebook and coding scheme. Data was analyzed by first reading the full IDI transcripts, becoming familiar with the data and noting the themes and concepts that emerged. A thematic framework was developed from the identified themes and sub-themes and this was then used to create codes and code the raw data.

Response rate

N/A

Sampling error estimates

N/A

The Current Population Survey Civic Engagement and Volunteering (CEV) Supplement is the most robust longitudinal survey about volunteerism and other forms of civic engagement in the United States. Produced by AmeriCorps in partnership with the U.S. Census Bureau, the CEV takes the pulse of our nation’s civic health every two years. The data on this page was collected in September 2017. The CEV can generate reliable estimates at the national level, within states and the District of Columbia, and in the largest twelve Metropolitan Statistical Areas to support evidence-based decision making and efforts to understand how people make a difference in communities across the country. This page was updated on January 16, 2025 to ensure consistency across all waves of CEV data. Click on "Export" to download and review an excerpt from the 2017 CEV Analytic Codebook that shows the variables available in the analytic CEV datasets produced by AmeriCorps. Click on "Show More" to download and review the following 2017 CEV data and resources provided as attachments: 1) CEV FAQs – answers to frequently asked technical questions about the CEV 2) Constructs and measures in the CEV 3) 2017 CEV Analytic Data and Setup Files – analytic dataset in Stata (.dta), R (.rdata), SPSS (.sav), and Excel (.csv) formats, codebook for analytic dataset, and Stata code (.do) to convert raw dataset to analytic formatting produced by AmeriCorps. 4) 2017 CEV Technical Documentation – codebook for raw dataset and full supplement documentation produced by U.S. Census Bureau 5) 2017 CEV Raw Data and Read In Files – raw dataset in Stata (.dta) format, Stata code (.do) and dictionary file (.dct) to read ASCII dataset (.dat) into Stata using layout files (.lis)

This spreadsheet provides all cleaned and validated data used in the analysis of the GSLWG survey to gather opinions about the governance of taxonomic lists. Data are anonymous. Interpertations of variables are available in a separate codebook file, also available on Dryad and associated with this manuscript. In addition to raw survey data, additional supplemental data are provided: 1. Coding manual providing definitions for each variable included in the survey dataset in .csv format 2. The data analysis code in Stata .do format and PDF format 3. The survey instrument in several languages in PDF format 4. A detailed description of the survey methodology and data analysis approach in PDF format 5. The full results of the survey in tabular form 6. Additional figures presenting survey results All data are also available on the website of the Open Science Framework (OSF), along with survey pre-registration data: https://osf.io/tz7ra/?view_only=4b1bc810ef794f7f9bb57240611989af Methods Data was collected using an online survey of taxonomists, other types of scientists, and users of taxonomic information. It was processed to clean data for analysis according to the standards recorded in the survey codebook, which is also availalbe on Dryad and associated with this manuscript. Data cleaning was performed using Stata. Full information about survey methods are availalbe in the accompanying article and the survey methods supplemental data also availalbe on Dryad. This survey was pre-registered with the Open Science Framework with a full description of survey development, implementation, and analysis methods: https://osf.io/tz7ra/?view_only=4b1bc810ef794f7f9bb57240611989af

Abstract (en): This collection presents in computer-readable form the data items used to produce the corresponding printed volume of the COUNTY AND CITY DATA BOOK, 1988. Included is a broad range of statistical information, made available by federal agencies and national associations, for counties, cities, and places. Information also is provided for the 50 states, the District of Columbia, and for the United States as a whole. The dataset is comprised of seven files: a county file, a city file, and a place file, with footnote files and data dictionaries for both the county and the city files. The county data file contains information on areas such as age, agriculture, banking, construction, crime, education, federal expenditures, personal income, population, and vital statistics. The city data file includes variables such as city government, climate, crime, housing, labor force and employment, manufactures, retail trade, and service industries. Included in the place data file are items on population and money income. ICPSR data undergo a confidentiality review and are altered when necessary to limit the risk of disclosure. ICPSR also routinely creates ready-to-go data files along with setups in the major statistical software formats as well as standard codebooks to accompany the data. In addition to these procedures, ICPSR performed the following processing steps for this data collection: Created variable labels and/or value labels.. The universe varies from item to item within the files, e.g., all persons, all housing units, all local governments, etc. 2009-05-26 SAS, SPSS, and Stata setups have been added to this data collection.2006-03-30 File CB9251.ALL.PDF was removed from any previous datasets and flagged as a study-level file, so that it will accompany all downloads. Users are advised that the codebook that the Census Bureau has issued for use with this dataset is a preliminary one and does not include codes and definitions for states, counties, and cities. The codes and definitions may be listed off the tape or users may refer to other sources such as the printed version of the COUNTY AND CITY DATA BOOK, 1988. For each case in the Counties Data file, there are two 1,239-character records.

These are the stata dataset (version 11), stata .do, and codebook (microsoft word) files that are necessary to replicate the analysis and results in: Volden, Craig, and Alan E. Wiseman. "Legislative Effectiveness in the United States Senate"

Data file of 1,000 treaties transmitted from 1949 to 2020, used in individual-level treaty gridlock analysis in Chapter 3 of Dysfunctional Diplomacy (2023). Includes raw data for treaties data set, with Stata codes & output and variable codebook in separate tabs. Please cite book if you use these data. Email Jeffrey Peake if you have any questions. Includes all data necessary to run analyses in Table 3.3 of book and the various data checks and additional variables that were not used in the analysis.

These files are for replication of "Resistance as Role Model: Disillusionment and Protest Among American Adolescents After 2016" There are three files: a. codebook.docx: Word document with details regarding the dataset and variables b. replication do file.do: STATA do file with complete code for the analysis and predicted values used in the paper, including the appendix c. Resistance_RoleModel.dta: STATA dataset, with variables labeled

The WIC Infant and Toddler Feeding Practices Study–2 (WIC ITFPS-2) (also known as the “Feeding My Baby Study”) is a national, longitudinal study that captures data on caregivers and their children who participated in the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) around the time of the child’s birth. The study addresses a series of research questions regarding feeding practices, the effect of WIC services on those practices, and the health and nutrition outcomes of children on WIC. Additionally, the study assesses changes in behaviors and trends that may have occurred over the past 20 years by comparing findings to the WIC Infant Feeding Practices Study–1 (WIC IFPS-1), the last major study of the diets of infants on WIC. This longitudinal cohort study has generated a series of reports. These datasets include data from caregivers and their children during the prenatal period and during the children’s first five years of life (child ages 1 to 60 months). A full description of the study design and data collection methods can be found in Chapter 1 of the Second Year Report (https://www.fns.usda.gov/wic/wic-infant-and-toddler-feeding-practices-st...). A full description of the sampling and weighting procedures can be found in Appendix B-1 of the Fourth Year Report (https://fns-prod.azureedge.net/sites/default/files/resource-files/WIC-IT...). Processing methods and equipment used Data in this dataset were primarily collected via telephone interview with caregivers. Children’s length/height and weight data were objectively collected while at the WIC clinic or during visits with healthcare providers. The study team cleaned the raw data to ensure the data were as correct, complete, and consistent as possible. Study date(s) and duration Data collection occurred between 2013 and 2019. Study spatial scale (size of replicates and spatial scale of study area) Respondents were primarily the caregivers of children who received WIC services around the time of the child’s birth. Data were collected from 80 WIC sites across 27 State agencies. Level of true replication Unknown Sampling precision (within-replicate sampling or pseudoreplication) This dataset includes sampling weights that can be applied to produce national estimates. A full description of the sampling and weighting procedures can be found in Appendix B-1 of the Fourth Year Report (https://fns-prod.azureedge.net/sites/default/files/resource-files/WIC-IT...). Level of subsampling (number and repeat or within-replicate sampling) A full description of the sampling and weighting procedures can be found in Appendix B-1 of the Fourth Year Report (https://fns-prod.azureedge.net/sites/default/files/resource-files/WIC-IT...). Study design (before–after, control–impacts, time series, before–after-control–impacts) Longitudinal cohort study. Description of any data manipulation, modeling, or statistical analysis undertaken Each entry in the dataset contains caregiver-level responses to telephone interviews. Also available in the dataset are children’s length/height and weight data, which were objectively collected while at the WIC clinic or during visits with healthcare providers. In addition, the file contains derived variables used for analytic purposes. The file also includes weights created to produce national estimates. The dataset does not include any personally-identifiable information for the study children and/or for individuals who completed the telephone interviews. Description of any gaps in the data or other limiting factors Please refer to the series of annual WIC ITFPS-2 reports (https://www.fns.usda.gov/wic/infant-and-toddler-feeding-practices-study-2-fourth-year-report) for detailed explanations of the study’s limitations. Outcome measurement methods and equipment used The majority of outcomes were measured via telephone interviews with children’s caregivers. Dietary intake was assessed using the USDA Automated Multiple Pass Method (https://www.ars.usda.gov/northeast-area/beltsville-md-bhnrc/beltsville-h...). Children’s length/height and weight data were objectively collected while at the WIC clinic or during visits with healthcare providers. Resources in this dataset:Resource Title: ITFP2 Year 5 Enroll to 60 Months Public Use Data CSV. File Name: itfps2_enrollto60m_publicuse.csvResource Description: ITFP2 Year 5 Enroll to 60 Months Public Use Data CSVResource Title: ITFP2 Year 5 Enroll to 60 Months Public Use Data Codebook. File Name: ITFPS2_EnrollTo60m_PUF_Codebook.pdfResource Description: ITFP2 Year 5 Enroll to 60 Months Public Use Data CodebookResource Title: ITFP2 Year 5 Enroll to 60 Months Public Use Data SAS SPSS STATA R Data. File Name: ITFP@_Year5_Enroll60_SAS_SPSS_STATA_R.zipResource Description: ITFP2 Year 5 Enroll to 60 Months Public Use Data SAS SPSS STATA R DataResource Title: ITFP2 Year 5 Ana to 60 Months Public Use Data CSV. File Name: ampm_1to60_ana_publicuse.csvResource Description: ITFP2 Year 5 Ana to 60 Months Public Use Data CSVResource Title: ITFP2 Year 5 Tot to 60 Months Public Use Data Codebook. File Name: AMPM_1to60_Tot Codebook.pdfResource Description: ITFP2 Year 5 Tot to 60 Months Public Use Data CodebookResource Title: ITFP2 Year 5 Ana to 60 Months Public Use Data Codebook. File Name: AMPM_1to60_Ana Codebook.pdfResource Description: ITFP2 Year 5 Ana to 60 Months Public Use Data CodebookResource Title: ITFP2 Year 5 Ana to 60 Months Public Use Data SAS SPSS STATA R Data. File Name: ITFP@_Year5_Ana_60_SAS_SPSS_STATA_R.zipResource Description: ITFP2 Year 5 Ana to 60 Months Public Use Data SAS SPSS STATA R DataResource Title: ITFP2 Year 5 Tot to 60 Months Public Use Data CSV. File Name: ampm_1to60_tot_publicuse.csvResource Description: ITFP2 Year 5 Tot to 60 Months Public Use Data CSVResource Title: ITFP2 Year 5 Tot to 60 Months Public Use SAS SPSS STATA R Data. File Name: ITFP@_Year5_Tot_60_SAS_SPSS_STATA_R.zipResource Description: ITFP2 Year 5 Tot to 60 Months Public Use SAS SPSS STATA R DataResource Title: ITFP2 Year 5 Food Group to 60 Months Public Use Data CSV. File Name: ampm_foodgroup_1to60m_publicuse.csvResource Description: ITFP2 Year 5 Food Group to 60 Months Public Use Data CSVResource Title: ITFP2 Year 5 Food Group to 60 Months Public Use Data Codebook. File Name: AMPM_FoodGroup_1to60m_Codebook.pdfResource Description: ITFP2 Year 5 Food Group to 60 Months Public Use Data CodebookResource Title: ITFP2 Year 5 Food Group to 60 Months Public Use SAS SPSS STATA R Data. File Name: ITFP@_Year5_Foodgroup_60_SAS_SPSS_STATA_R.zipResource Title: WIC Infant and Toddler Feeding Practices Study-2 Data File Training Manual. File Name: WIC_ITFPS-2_DataFileTrainingManual.pdf

*Project: Teacher's Bias in Assessments

*Code: Replication of data cleaning and preparation and analyses

*Authors: Carlos J. Gil-Hernández, Irene Pañeda-Fernández, Leire Salazar, and Jonatan Castaño-Muñoz

*Last Update: 04/07/2024

*Software: STATA/MP 17

Here you can find the replication dofile in STATA format in the "code" folder and the raw and working datasets (including the codebook) of the teacher's bias in assessment experiment in the "data" folder:

1. "/replication files/code/datacleaning.do" contains all the data cleaning and preparation procedures from the raw anonymized Qualtrics data where we applied the survey experiment (see "data" folder .dta or .csv files named "raw_dataset_anonymized") to set a working dataset ready to be analyzed.

2. The folder "/replication files/data" contains the data files named "raw_dataset_anonymized" and "cleandataset" in .dta (data/STATA) or .csv (data/CSV) format on the raw and working data, respectively, to replicate the findings of the teacher's bias in assessments project or run your own analyses. If you do not have access to STATA software, you can check the variables labels of the "cleandataset" in the "data/codebook_cleandataset" Excel file.

Data Citation: Gil-Hernández, Carlos J., Leire Salazar, Jonatan Castaño Muñoz, and Irene Pañeda-Fernandez. 2023. "Teacher's Bias Dataset: A Factorial Survey Experiment." European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC) [Dataset] PID: http://data.europa.eu/89h/f14f5209-f032-4218-a89a-4643143809af

3. "datanalysis.do" reproduces all the tables and figures presented in the article and online appendix (if you want to reproduce the analyses from the pre-test pilot data, please get in contact with the corresponding author) using the data file named "cleandataset" in the "data" folder (in .dta or .csv format). The output from "datanalysis.do" will be printed in the "/replication files/output" subfolders for tables (main or appendix) or figures (main or appendix).

Abstract (en): This data collection is a compendium of data for all counties in the United States for the period 1944 to 1977. The data provide diverse information such as local government activities, population estimates and characteristics, and housing unit descriptors. Also included is information on local government revenues, property taxes, capital outlay, debts, expenditures on education, highways, public welfare, health and hospitals, and police, as well as information on births, deaths, schooling, labor force, employment, family income, family characteristics, electoral votes, and housing characteristics. Additional variables provide information on manufacturing, retail and wholesale trade, banking, mineral industries, farm population, agriculture, crime, and weather. Users may also be interested in the related data collection, COUNTY AND CITY DATA BOOK [UNITED STATES] CONSOLIDATED FILE: CITY DATA, 1944-1977 (ICPSR 7735). ICPSR data undergo a confidentiality review and are altered when necessary to limit the risk of disclosure. ICPSR also routinely creates ready-to-go data files along with setups in the major statistical software formats as well as standard codebooks to accompany the data. In addition to these procedures, ICPSR performed the following processing steps for this data collection: Created variable labels and/or value labels.; Checked for undocumented or out-of-range codes.. Individual states, the District of Columbia, and counties or county equivalents for which data were published in the County and City Data Books, in the entire United States in the period 1947-1977. Smallest Geographic Unit: county 2012-09-18 The data have been checked and corrected for inconsistencies, and have been reformatted to one record per case. SAS, SPSS, and Stata setup files have been updated. SPSS and Stata system files and a SAS transport (CPORT) file have been added to the collection. The codebook has been updated.2008-04-01 SAS, SPSS, and Stata setup files have been added to this data collection. record abstractsThis data file includes both state and county records. Records for counties in each state are listed immediately following the state record. All records have the same structure, and the identifier for each record includes both state and the county codes. In the state records, the county code is listed as 000.

These data replication file materials are for George A. Krause and Jason S. Byers' article manuscript and online appendix for "Confirmation Dynamics: Differential Vetting in the Appointment of U.S. Federal Agency Leaders." The materials include a single (1) READ ME document [PLEASE READ BEFORE PROCEEDING], a single (1) Data & Variable Codebook, a single (1) Stata database (.dta) file, various Stata program code (.do) files, plus a corresponding set of Stata output (.smcl) files, plus all Stata graphics (.gph) files generated from the program files.

Replication materials, including Stata .do file (for analyses), corresponding Stata .dta dataset, and PDF codebook. These materials correspond to an article entitled "Place, Race, and the Geographic Politics of White Grievance" accepted for publication (in 2023, but with an undetermined-at-the-time-of-my-uploading-these-materials publication date) by the journal "Political Behavior."

Abstract (en): This study is part of a time-series collection of national surveys fielded continuously since 1952. The election studies are designed to present data on Americans' social backgrounds, enduring political predispositions, social and political values, perceptions and evaluations of groups and candidates, opinions on questions of public policy, and participation in political life. In addition to core items, new content includes questions on values, political knowledge, and attitudes on racial policy, as well as more general attitudes conceptualized as antecedent to these opinions on racial issues. The Main Data File also contains vote validation data that were expanded to include information from the appropriate election office and were attached to the records of each of the respondents in the post-election survey. The expanded data consist of the respondent's post case ID, vote validation ID, and two variables to clarify the distinction between the office of registration and the office associated with the respondent's sample address. The second data file, Bias Nonresponse Data File, contains respondent-level field administration variables. Of 3,833 lines of sample that were originally issued for the 1990 Study, 2,176 resulted in completed interviews, others were nonsample, and others were noninterviews for a variety of reasons. For each line of sample, the Bias Nonresponse Data File includes sampling data, result codes, control variables, and interviewer variables. Detailed geocode data are blanked but available under conditions of confidential access (contact the American National Election Studies at the Center for Political Studies, University of Michigan, for further details). This is a specialized file, of particular interest to those who are interested in survey nonresponse. Demographic variables include age, party affiliation, marital status, education, employment status, occupation, religious preference, and ethnicity. ICPSR data undergo a confidentiality review and are altered when necessary to limit the risk of disclosure. ICPSR also routinely creates ready-to-go data files along with setups in the major statistical software formats as well as standard codebooks to accompany the data. In addition to these procedures, ICPSR performed the following processing steps for this data collection: Performed consistency checks.; Standardized missing values.; Checked for undocumented or out-of-range codes.. Response Rates: The response rate for this study is 67.7 percent. The study was in the field until January 31, although 67 percent of the interviews were taken by November 25, 80 percent by December 7, and 93 percent by December 31. All United States households in the 50 states. National multistage area probability sample. 2015-11-10 The study metadata was updated.2009-01-09 YYYY-MM-DD Part 1, the Main Data File, incorporates errata that were posted separately under the Fourth ICPSR Edition. Part 2, the Bias Nonresponse Data File, has been added to the data collection, along with corresponding SAS, SPSS, and Stata setup files and documentation. The codebook has been updated by adding a technical memorandum on the sampling design of the study previously missing from the codebook. The nonresponse file contains respondent-level field administration variables for those interested in survey nonresponse. The collection now includes files in ASCII, SPSS portable, SAS transport (CPORT), and Stata system formats.2000-02-21 The data for this study are now available in SAS transport and SPSS export formats in addition to the ASCII data file. Variables in the dataset have been renumbered to the following format: 2-digit (or 2-character) year prefix + 4 digits + [optional] 1-character suffix. Dataset ID and version variables have also been added. Additionally, the Voter Validation Office Administration Interview File (Expanded Version) has been merged with the main data file, and the codebook and SPSS setup files have been replaced. Also, SAS setup files have been added to the collection, and the data collection instrument is now provided as a PDF file. Two files are no longer being released with this collection: the Voter Validation Office Administration Interview File (Unexpanded Version) and the Results of First Contact With Respondent file. Funding insitution(s): National Science Foundation (SOC77-08885 and SES-8341310). face-to-face interviewThere was significantly more content in this post-election survey than ...

Administrative data used in regression analyses to test for interactions among student gender, teacher gender, and performance on a state civics and economics exam. Data were provided by the North Carolina Education Research Data Center. To maintain privacy of the individuals involved in the study, all of whom were public high school students, we are not permitted to share our dataset. We have instead posted a copy of the data use agreement and a Stata do file and codebook for the main regression analysis used in the paper.

This is a data set of United States government administrative agencies created between 1946 and 1997. The data were used for all quantitative analysis in the book. Each agency created during this period is 1 observation. The data set excludes advisory, quasi-official, multi-lateral, educational and research agencies, and support offices common to all cabinet departments. An explanation of the data set, how the data was collected, and a description of the variables is included in the codebook below. Stata batch files for the models estimated in chapters 2, 5 are also included below. All users are advised to look at the data update before using the data for new projects. Please report any problems or questions to me.

The Hate Crime data is an FBI data set that is part of the annual Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program data. This data contains information about hate crimes reported in the United States. The data sets here combine all data from the years 1992-2015 into a single file. Please note that the files are quite large and may take some time to open.Each row indicates a hate crime incident for an agency in a given year. I have made a unique ID column ("unique_id") by combining the year, agency ORI9 (the 9 character Originating Identifier code), and incident number columns together. Each column is a variable related to that incident or to the reporting agency. Some of the important columns are the incident date, what crime occurred (up to 10 crimes), the number of victims for each of these crimes, the bias motivation for each of these crimes, and the location of each crime. It also includes the total number of victims, total number of offenders, and race of offenders (as a group). Finally, it has a number of columns indicating if the victim for each offense was a certain type of victim or not (e.g. individual victim, business victim religious victim, etc.). All the data was downloaded from NACJD as ASCII+SPSS Setup files and read into R using the package asciiSetupReader. All work to clean the data and save it in various file formats was also done in R. For the R code used to clean this data, see here. https://github.com/jacobkap/crime_data. The only changes I made to the data are the following. Minor changes to column names to make all column names 32 characters or fewer (so it can be saved in a Stata format), changed the name of some UCR offense codes (e.g. from "agg asslt" to "aggravated assault"), made all character values lower case, reordered columns. I also added state, county, and place FIPS code from the LEAIC (crosswalk) and generated incident month, weekday, and month-day variables from the incident date variable included in the original data. The zip file contains the data in the following formats and a codebook: .csv - Microsoft Excel.dta - Stata.sav - SPSS.rda - RIf you have any questions, comments, or suggestions please contact me at jkkaplan6@gmail.com.