This data contains Index match, index match Advance

Unlock the power of real-time data! Explore the booming real-time index database market, projected to reach $32 billion by 2033. Discover key trends, leading companies (Elastic, AWS, Splunk), and regional insights in this comprehensive market analysis.

An Environmental Quality Index (EQI) for all counties in the United States for the time period 2000-2005 was developed which incorporated data from five environmental domains: air, water, land, built, and socio-demographic. The EQI was developed in four parts: domain identification; data source identification and review; variable construction; and data reduction using principal components analysis (PCA). The methods applied provide a reproducible approach that capitalizes almost exclusively on publically-available data sources. The primary goal in creating the EQI is to use it as a composite environmental indicator for research on human health. A series of peer reviewed manuscripts utilized the EQI in examining health outcomes. This dataset is not publicly accessible because: This series of papers are considered Human health research - not to be loaded onto ScienceHub. It can be accessed through the following means: The EQI data can be accessed at: https://edg.epa.gov/data/Public/ORD/NHEERL/EQI. Format: EQI data, metadata, formats, and data dictionary all available at website. This dataset is associated with the following publications: Gray, C., L. Messer, K. Rappazzo, J. Jagai, S. Grabich, and D. Lobdell. The association between physical inactivity and obesity is modified by five domains of environmental quality in U.S. adults: A cross-sectional study. PLoS ONE. Public Library of Science, San Francisco, CA, USA, 13(8): e0203301, (2018). Patel, A., J. Jagai, L. Messer, C. Gray, K. Rappazzo, S. DeflorioBarker, and D. Lobdell. Associations between environmental quality and infant mortality in the United States, 2000-2005. Archives of Public Health. BioMed Central Ltd, London, UK, 76(60): 1, (2018). Gray, C., D. Lobdell, K. Rappazzo, Y. Jian, J. Jagai, L. Messer, A. Patel, S. Deflorio-Barker, C. Lyttle, J. Solway, and A. Rzhetsky. Associations between environmental quality and adult asthma prevalence in medical claims data. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH. Elsevier B.V., Amsterdam, NETHERLANDS, 166: 529-536, (2018).

Dataset Name: City Happiness Index

Dataset Description:

This dataset and the related codes are entirely prepared, original, and exclusive by Emirhan BULUT. The dataset includes crucial features and measurements from various cities around the world, focusing on factors that may affect the overall happiness score of each city. By analyzing these factors, we aim to gain insights into the living conditions and satisfaction of the population in urban environments.

The dataset consists of the following features:

• City: Name of the city.
• Month: The month in which the data is recorded.
• Year: The year in which the data is recorded.
• Decibel_Level: Average noise levels in decibels, indicating the auditory comfort of the citizens.
• Traffic_Density: Level of traffic density (Low, Medium, High, Very High), which might impact citizens' daily commute and stress levels.
• Green_Space_Area: Percentage of green spaces in the city, positively contributing to the mental well-being and relaxation of the inhabitants.
• Air_Quality_Index: Index measuring the quality of air, a crucial aspect affecting citizens' health and overall satisfaction.
• Happiness_Score: The average happiness score of the city (on a 1-10 scale), representing the subjective well-being of the population.
• Cost_of_Living_Index: Index measuring the cost of living in the city (relative to a reference city), which could impact the financial satisfaction of the citizens.
• Healthcare_Index: Index measuring the quality of healthcare in the city, an essential component of the population's well-being and contentment.

With these features, the dataset aims to analyze and understand the relationship between various urban factors and the happiness of a city's population. The developed Deep Q-Network model, PIYAAI_2, is designed to learn from this data to provide accurate predictions in future scenarios. Using Reinforcement Learning, the model is expected to improve its performance over time as it learns from new data and adapts to changes in the environment.

This is the data used for the development of the Index Index model.

Dallas Fed Manufacturing Shipments Index in the United States increased to 15.10 points in November from 5.80 points in October of 2025. This dataset includes a chart with historical data for the United States Dallas Fed Manufacturing Shipments Index.

1) Data Introduction • The AI Global Index Dataset is a comprehensive index that benchmarks 62 countries based on the level of AI investment, innovation, and implementation, including seven key indicators (human resources, infrastructure, operational environment, research, development, government strategy, commercialization) and general information by country (region, cluster, income group, political system).

2) Data Utilization (1) AI Global Index Dataset has characteristics that: • This dataset consists of a total of 13 columns with 5 categorical variables (regions, clusters, etc.) and 8 numerical variables (scores for each indicator), covering 62 countries. • The seven key indicators are classified into three pillars: △ implementation (human resources/infrastructure/operational environment) △ innovation (R&D) △ investment (government strategy/commercialization), and assess each country's overall AI ecosystem capabilities in multiple dimensions. (2) AI Global Index Dataset can be used to: • Global AI leadership pattern analysis: Correlation analysis between seven indicators can identify AI strengths and weaknesses by country and perform group comparisons by region and income level. • Machine learning-based predictive model: It can be used for data science education and application, such as country-specific index prediction through regression analysis or classification of AI development types through clustering.

This dataset was developed to model habitat suitability for two ungulate species on the island of Lanai. This includes raster data derived from WorldView-2 data to create a bare ground index. This index, in addition to other datasets, was used to create the habitat suitability models. Datasets and indices derived for use in modeling efforts, as well as suitability models, are included within this data release.

SCHOOL PROFICIENCY INDEXSummaryThe school proficiency index uses school-level data on the performance of 4th grade students on state exams to describe which neighborhoods have high-performing elementary schools nearby and which are near lower performing elementary schools. The school proficiency index is a function of the percent of 4th grade students proficient in reading (r) and math (m) on state test scores for up to three schools (i=1,2,3) within 1.5 miles of the block-group centroid. S denotes 4th grade school enrollment:Elementary schools are linked with block-groups based on a geographic mapping of attendance area zones from School Attendance Boundary Information System (SABINS), where available, or within-district proximity matches of up to the three-closest schools within 1.5 miles. In cases with multiple school matches, an enrollment-weighted score is calculated following the equation above. Please note that in this version of the data (AFFHT0004), there is no school proficiency data for jurisdictions in Kansas, West Virginia, and Puerto Rico because no data was reported for jurisdictions in these states in the Great Schools 2013-14 dataset. InterpretationValues are percentile ranked and range from 0 to 100. The higher the score, the higher the school system quality is in a neighborhood. Data Source: Great Schools (proficiency data, 2015-16); Common Core of Data (4th grade school addresses and enrollment, 2015-16); Maponics (attendance boundaries, 2016).Related AFFH-T Local Government, PHA and State Tables/Maps: Table 12; Map 7.

To learn more about the School Proficiency Index visit: https://www.hud.gov/program_offices/fair_housing_equal_opp/affh ; https://www.hud.gov/sites/dfiles/FHEO/documents/AFFH-T-Data-Documentation-AFFHT0006-July-2020.pdf, for questions about the spatial attribution of this dataset, please reach out to us at GISHelpdesk@hud.gov. Date of Coverage: 07/2020

Leaf Area Index (LAI) is a fundamental vegetation structural variable that drives energy and mass exchanges between the plant and the atmosphere. Moderate-resolution (300m – 7km) global LAI data products have been widely applied to track global vegetation changes, drive Earth system models, monitor crop growth and productivity, etc. Yet, cutting-edge applications in climate adaptation, hydrology, and sustainable agriculture require LAI information at higher spatial resolution (< 100m) to model and understand heterogeneous landscapes. This dataset was built to assist a machine-learning-based approach for mapping LAI from 30m-resolution Landsat images across the contiguous US (CONUS). The data was derived from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) Version 6 LAI/FPAR, Landsat Collection 1 surface reflectance, and NLCD Land Cover datasets over 2006 – 2018 using Google Earth Engine. Each record/sample/row includes a MODIS LAI value, corresponding Landsat surface reflectance in green, red, NIR, SWIR1 bands, a land cover (biome) type, geographic location, and other auxiliary information. Each sample represents a MODIS LAI pixel (500m) within which a single biome type dominates 90% of the area. The spatial homogeneity of the samples was further controlled by a screening process based on the coefficient of variation of the Landsat surface reflectance. In total, there are approximately 1.6 million samples, stratified by biome, Landsat sensor, and saturation status from the MODIS LAI algorithm. This dataset can be used to train machine learning models and generate LAI maps for Landsat 5, 7, 8 surface reflectance images within CONUS. Detailed information on the sample generation and quality control can be found in the related journal article. Resources in this dataset:Resource Title: README. File Name: LAI_train_samples_CONUS_README.txtResource Description: Description and metadata of the main datasetResource Software Recommended: Notepad,url: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/p/windows-notepad/9msmlrh6lzf3?activetab=pivot:overviewtab Resource Title: LAI_training_samples_CONUS. File Name: LAI_train_samples_CONUS_v0.1.1.csvResource Description: This CSV file consists of the training samples for estimating Leaf Area Index based on Landsat surface reflectance images (Collection 1 Tire 1). Each sample has a MODIS LAI value and corresponding surface reflectance derived from Landsat pixels within the MODIS pixel. Contact: Yanghui Kang (kangyanghui@gmail.com)
Column description

UID: Unique identifier. Format: LATITUDE_LONGITUDE_SENSOR_PATHROW_DATE
Landsat_ID: Landsat image ID Date: Landsat image date in "YYYYMMDD" Latitude: Latitude (WGS84) of the MODIS LAI pixel center Longitude: Longitude (WGS84) of the MODIS LAI pixel center MODIS_LAI: MODIS LAI value in "m2/m2" MODIS_LAI_std: MODIS LAI standard deviation in "m2/m2" MODIS_LAI_sat: 0 - MODIS Main (RT) method used no saturation; 1 - MODIS Main (RT) method with saturation NLCD_class: Majority class code from the National Land Cover Dataset (NLCD) NLCD_frequency: Percentage of the area cover by the majority class from NLCD Biome: Biome type code mapped from NLCD (see below for more information) Blue: Landsat surface reflectance in the blue band Green: Landsat surface reflectance in the green band Red: Landsat surface reflectance in the red band Nir: Landsat surface reflectance in the near infrared band Swir1: Landsat surface reflectance in the shortwave infrared 1 band Swir2: Landsat surface reflectance in the shortwave infrared 2 band Sun_zenith: Solar zenith angle from the Landsat image metadata. This is a scene-level value. Sun_azimuth: Solar azimuth angle from the Landsat image metadata. This is a scene-level value. NDVI: Normalized Difference Vegetation Index computed from Landsat surface reflectance EVI: Enhanced Vegetation Index computed from Landsat surface reflectance NDWI: Normalized Difference Water Index computed from Landsat surface reflectance GCI: Green Chlorophyll Index = Nir/Green - 1

Biome code

1 - Deciduous Forest
2 - Evergreen Forest
3 - Mixed Forest
4 - Shrubland
5 - Grassland/Pasture
6 - Cropland
7 - Woody Wetland
8 - Herbaceous Wetland

Reference Dataset: All data was accessed through Google Earth Engine Gorelick, N., Hancher, M., Dixon, M., Ilyushchenko, S., Thau, D., & Moore, R. (2017). Google Earth Engine: Planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone. Remote Sensing of Environment. MODIS Version 6 Leaf Area Index/FPAR 4-day L5 Global 500m Myneni, R., Y. Knyazikhin, T. Park. MOD15A2H MODIS/Terra Leaf Area Index/FPAR 8-Day L4 Global 500m SIN Grid V006. 2015, distributed by NASA EOSDIS Land Processes DAAC, https://doi.org/10.5067/MODIS/MOD15A2H.006 Landsat 5/7/8 Collection 1 Surface Reflectance Landsat Level-2 Surface Reflectance Science Product courtesy of the U.S. Geological Survey. Masek, J.G., Vermote, E.F., Saleous N.E., Wolfe, R., Hall, F.G., Huemmrich, K.F., Gao, F., Kutler, J., and Lim, T-K. (2006). A Landsat surface reflectance dataset for North America, 1990–2000. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters 3(1):68-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2005.857030. Vermote, E., Justice, C., Claverie, M., & Franch, B. (2016). Preliminary analysis of the performance of the Landsat 8/OLI land surface reflectance product. Remote Sensing of Environment. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2016.04.008. National Land Cover Dataset (NLCD) Yang, Limin, Jin, Suming, Danielson, Patrick, Homer, Collin G., Gass, L., Bender, S.M., Case, Adam, Costello, C., Dewitz, Jon A., Fry, Joyce A., Funk, M., Granneman, Brian J., Liknes, G.C., Rigge, Matthew B., Xian, George, A new generation of the United States National Land Cover Database—Requirements, research priorities, design, and implementation strategies: ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, v. 146, p. 108–123, at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2018.09.006 Resource Software Recommended: Microsoft Excel,url: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/excel

There are a total of 5 datasets.sp500_datasp500_newFeatures_datasp500_lagged_datanasdaq_lagged_datahsi_lagged_dataThe first dataset contains 34 years worth of data from 1990 to 2023 for the stock index S&P500. This dataset has been preprocessed and is used for training and testing. The second dataset transforms the initial dataset with the addition of new features derived from the first dataset. The third dataset is a different transformation of the first dataset where the features are mostly contained of lagged features. The fourth dataset contains 10 years of data for the NASDAQ index from 2014-2023 following the same format of lagged features like the third dataset. The fifth dataset has 10 years of data from 2014-2023 for the HSI stock index. This dataset also follows the same format of features as the third datasetAll five of these datasets were used as implementations for a research to predict tomorrow's closing price based on today's financial features

Indexing Magic Cards

## Overview

Indexing Magic Cards is a dataset for object detection tasks - it contains Magic Cards annotations for 297 images.

## Getting Started

You can download this dataset for use within your own projects, or fork it into a workspace on Roboflow to create your own model.

  ## License

  This dataset is available under the [CC BY 4.0 license](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/CC BY 4.0).

Dataset

This dataset was created by _anxious

Released under CC0: Public Domain

Contents

Leading Economic Index Honduras increased 3.70 percent in September of 2025 over the same month in the previous year. This dataset provides - Honduras Leading Economic Index- actual values, historical data, forecast, chart, statistics, economic calendar and news.

This dataset shows Qatar’s score and ranking in the Network Readiness Index. The index assesses how well countries are prepared to leverage information and communication technologies (ICT) for digital transformation and socioeconomic development. Originally launched by the World Economic Forum and now managed by Saïd Business School (Oxford) and the Portulans Institute, the index provides valuable insights to policymakers and researchers to support strategies for innovation, inclusion, and digital progress.

Measuring the usage of informatics resources such as software tools and databases is essential to quantifying their impact, value and return on investment. We have developed a publicly available dataset of informatics resource publications and their citation network, along with an associated metric (u-Index) to measure informatics resources’ impact over time. Our dataset differentiates the context in which citations occur to distinguish between ‘awareness’ and ‘usage’, and uses a citing universe of open access publications to derive citation counts for quantifying impact. Resources with a high ratio of usage citations to awareness citations are likely to be widely used by others and have a high u-Index score. We have pre-calculated the u-Index for nearly 100,000 informatics resources. We demonstrate how the u-Index can be used to track informatics resource impact over time. The method of calculating the u-Index metric, the pre-computed u-Index values, and the dataset we compiled to calculate the u-Index are publicly available.

Please use the MESINESP2 corpus (the second edition of the shared-task) since it has a higher level of curation, quality and is organized by document type (scientific articles, patents and clinical trials).

Introduction

The Mesinesp (Spanish BioASQ track, see https://temu.bsc.es/mesinesp) development set has a total of 750 records indexed manually by seven experienced medical literature indexers. Indexing is done using DeCS codes, a sort of Spanish equivalent to MeSH terms. Records were distributed in a way that each article was annotated, at least, by two different human indexers.

The data annotation process consisted in two steps:

Manual indexing step. DeCS codes were manually assigned to each record following the DeCS manual indexing guidelines.

Manual validation and consensus. The joined set of manually indexed DeCS codes generated by both indexers were manually revised and corrections were done.

These annotations were analyzed, resulting in an agreement using the Jaccard index.

Records consisted basically in medical literature abstracts and titles from the IBECS and LILACS databases.

Zip structure The zip file contains two different development sets:

Official development set, which has the union of the annotations, with an agreement of macro = 0.6568 and micro = 0.6819. This set is composed by all the different (unique) DeCS codes that have been added by any annotator for each document; and

Core-descriptors development set, which has the intersection of the annotations, with an agreement of macro = 1.0 and micro = 1.0. This set is composed of the common DeCS codes that have been added by two or more annotators for each document.

Corpus format

Each dataset is a JSON object with one single key named "articles", which contains a list of documents. So, the raw format of the file is one line per document plus two additional lines (the first and the last) to enclose that list of documents and the expected type of data is as follows:

{"articles":[ {"abstractText":str,"db":str,"decsCodes":list,"id":str,"journal":str,"title":str,"year":int}, ... ]}

To clarify, the order of appearance of the fields in each document is as follows (note that this example it is pretty printed for readability purposes):

{ "articles": [ { "abstractText": "Content of the abstract", "db": "Name of the source database", "decsCodes": [ "code1", "code2", "code3" ], "id": "Id of the document", "journal": "Name of the journal", "title": "Title of the document", "year": 2019 } ] }

Note: The fields "db", "journal" and "year" might be null.

Copyright (c) 2020 Secretaría de Estado de Digitalización e Inteligencia Artificial

This dataset provides air quality index (AQI) data from major cities worldwide, covering the years 2015 to 2025. It is compiled from various sources, including government monitoring stations, environmental agencies, and open APIs.

The dataset includes daily AQI values along with major pollutants such as PM2.5, PM10, NO2, SO2, CO, and O3. Additional meteorological data such as temperature, humidity, and wind speed are also included to support deeper analysis.

Dataset Features: Date: The date of AQI measurement (YYYY-MM-DD). City: Name of the city where the AQI is recorded. Country: Country of the city. AQI: The daily air quality index value. PM2.5 (µg/m³): Fine particulate matter concentration. PM10 (µg/m³): Larger particulate matter concentration. NO2 (ppb): Nitrogen dioxide concentration. SO2 (ppb): Sulfur dioxide concentration. CO (ppm): Carbon monoxide concentration. O3 (ppb): Ozone concentration. Temperature (°C): Daily average temperature. Humidity (%): Daily average humidity. Wind Speed (m/s): Daily average wind speed. Potential Use Cases: ✅ Data Science & Machine Learning: Predict air quality trends, create AQI forecasting models, and build environmental monitoring applications. ✅ Health & Epidemiology: Analyze correlations between air pollution and respiratory diseases, cardiovascular conditions, and general health. ✅ Climate & Environmental Research: Study pollution patterns, seasonal variations, and their relation to climate change. ✅ Urban Planning & Policy Making: Help city planners implement better pollution control strategies.

Why This Dataset? 📌 10-year coverage (2015-2025) for long-term trend analysis. 📌 Global scope with diverse geographical representation. 📌 Multiple pollutants & weather data for comprehensive insights. 📌 Ready-to-use for ML models, EDA, and research.

This dataset provides values for INDEX reported in several countries. The data includes current values, previous releases, historical highs and record lows, release frequency, reported unit and currency.