California Medical Fee-for-Service

Geographic, Legal and Specialty Data for In-State and Out-of-State Providers

By California Health and Human Services [source]

About this dataset

Welcome to the California Health and Human Services Agency's Open Data Portal! Here, you can explore and utilize information from one of the state's most valuable assets: the non-confidential data set of Medi-Cal Fee-for-Service (FFS) program providers.

This dataset provides insight into Medi-Cal FFS enrollment. The information was retrieved from the Provider Master File (PMF), which is maintained by the Provider Enrollment Division (PED). With this dataset, you will gain insights into provider number, legal name, type description, specialty description and other geographical data points such as county code, attention line address parts , landmark coordinate points (longitude/latitude) and more!

The goal with this Open Data Portal initiative is to empower Californians with:

• Increased public access to high quality health & human service data;
• Stemmed creativity & innovation in research;
• The ability to make informed decisions about our health & services providers;
• Transparency in government policy expenditure measures.

Our hope is that you'll use these tools for responsible data analytics exploration on not just Medi-Cal FFS provision but on any related subject matter that interest& benefit your community at large. Good luck & happy researching!

More Datasets

For more datasets, click here.

Featured Notebooks

• 🚨 Your notebook can be here! 🚨!

How to use the dataset

Research Ideas

• Creating a mobile application or website to help people easily and quickly find their nearest Medi-Cal FFS providers based on location, specialty and provider type.
• Developing analytics tools to help organizations understand the concentrations of providers across the state in order to inform decision making when considering regional expansion and improving service accessibility.
• Developing a tool that visualizes specialty diversity across the state to identify areas with low provider density while helping inform strategies aimed at increasing access to care for communities with high needs populations

Acknowledgements

If you use this dataset in your research, please credit the original authors. Data Source

License

License: Open Database License (ODbL) v1.0 - You are free to: - Share - copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. - Adapt - remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. - You must: - Give appropriate credit - Provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. - ShareAlike - You must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original. - Keep intact - all notices that refer to this license, including copyright notices. - No Derivatives - If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material. - No additional restrictions - You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

Columns

File: Profile_of_Enrolled_Medi-Cal_Fee-for-Service_FFS_Providers_as_of_May_1_2016.csv | Column name | Description | |:----------------------------|:---------------------------------------------------------------| | NPI | National Provider Identifier (Number) | | SERVICE LOCATION NUMBER | Unique identifier for the provider's service location (Number) | | LEGAL NAME | Legal name of the provider (Text) | | TYPE DESCRIPTION | Type of provider (Text) | | SPECIALTY DESCRIPTION | Specialty of the provider (Text) | | OUT OF STATE INDICATOR | Indicates if the provider is located out of state (Boolean) | | IN/OUT OF STATE | Indicates if the provider is located in or out of state (Text) | | COUNTY CODE | County code of the provider's service location (Number) | | COUNTY NAME | County name of the provider's service location (Text) | | ADDRESS ATTENTION | Attention line of the provider's address (Text) | | ADDRESS LINE 1 | First l...

BackgroundThe existing literature has not examined how Chinese direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic testing providers navigate the issues of informed consent, privacy, and data protection associated with testing services. This research aims to explore these questions by examining the relevant documents and messages published on websites of the Chinese DTC genetic test providers.MethodsUsing Baidu.com, the most popular Chinese search engine, we compiled the websites of providers who offer genetic testing services and analyzed available documents related to informed consent, the terms of services, and the privacy policy. The analyses were guided by the following inquiries as they applied to each DTC provider: the methods available for purchasing testing products; the methods providers used to obtain informed consent; privacy issues and measures for protecting consumers’ health information; the policy for third-party data sharing; consumers right to their data; and the liabilities in the event of a data breach.Results68.7% of providers offer multiple channels for purchasing genetic testing products, and that social media has become a popular platform to promote testing services. Informed consent forms are not available on 94% of providers’ websites and a privacy policy is only offered by 45.8% of DTC genetic testing providers. Thirty-nine providers stated that they used measures to protect consumers’ information, of which, 29 providers have distinguished consumers’ general personal information from their genetic information. In 33.7% of the cases examined, providers stated that with consumers’ explicit permission, they could reuse and share the clients’ information for non-commercial purposes. Twenty-three providers granted consumer rights to their health information, with the most frequently mentioned right being the consumers’ right to decide how their data can be used by providers. Lastly, 21.7% of providers clearly stated their liabilities in the event of a data breach, placing more emphasis on the providers’ exemption from any liability.ConclusionsCurrently, the Chinese DTC genetic testing business is running in a regulatory vacuum, governed by self-regulation. The government should develop a comprehensive legal framework to regulate DTC genetic testing offerings. Regulatory improvements should be made based on periodical reviews of the supervisory strategy to meet the rapid development of the DTC genetic testing industry.

This file contains the prediction accuracy for subway and bus. Prediction accuracy is determined by the number of accurate predictions vs the number of total predictions for each "bin" or timeframe. Data is not guaranteed to be complete for any line or date. There is a known gap in Orange Line data from 09/02/2022 to 09/16/2022.NameDescriptionData TypeExampleweeklyDate representing one week's worth of data. For both bus and subway, the week is labeled as a Friday and represents data from the previous Friday up till the Thursday the day before. (05/23/2025 represents data from 05/16/2025 to 05/22/2025.) The date is based on "service day", so "May 1" means May 1, 3:00am ET until May 2, 2:59am ET.Date05/23/2025modeEither "bus" for bus predictions, or "subway" for Red, Orange, Green-[B/C/D/E], Blue, and Mattapan predictions.Stringbusroute_idThe subway route the data is for. Our bus data provider does not have this data at a per-route level.StringGreen-Barrival_departureFor bus, whether the data is about the timing of an arrival at a bus stop, or the departure from that bus stop. Bus only supports "departure". Absent on subway data because subway uses a "blended" approach of departure predictions at terminals, and arrival predictions otherwise.StringdeparturebinThe bin a prediction belongs to based on how far in the future the predicted event is for. The options are "0-3 min", "3-6 min", "6-12 min", and "12-30 min".String0-3 minnum_predictionsThe count of predictions sampled that meet the criteria of the other fields.Integer50000num_accurate_predictionsOf the num_predictions, how many of them were considered accurate, where "accurate" means the predicted number of seconds was within a threshold of the actual number of seconds, based on the bin. For a given bin, the passing threshold is if a vehicle arrives: 0-3 min: 60 seconds early to 60 seconds late, 3-6 min: 90 seconds early to 120 seconds late, 6-12 min: 150 seconds early to 210 seconds late, 12:30 min: 240 seconds early to 360 seconds late.Integer30000MassDOT/MBTA shall not be held liable for any errors in this data. This includes errors of omission, commission, errors concerning the content of the data, and relative and positional accuracy of the data. This data cannot be construed to be a legal document. Primary sources from which this data was compiled must be consulted for verification of information contained in this data.

Raw water quality data collected from a fixed pier at 1 meter below mean lower low water. Instrument collecting data is a YSI 6600 V4 sonde with a conductivity/temperature probe, strain gauge pressure sensor, optical dissolved oxygen probe, optical fluorescence chlorophyll probe, optical fluorescence turbidity probe and potentiometric glass bulb pH probe. Data are raw and not flagged or curated in any manner other than curtailed for deployment periods where the YSI sonde is deployed in the water. Download at your own risk. These data may be used and redistributed for free but they are not intended for legal use, since they may contain inaccuracies. For use for publications please reference the Central and Northern California Ocean Observing system (CeNCOOS) and NOAA. Neither the data provider, CeNCOOS, NOAA, nor the United States Government, nor any of their employees or contractors, makes any warranty, express or implied, including warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose, or assumes any legal liability for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness, or this information. Please see http://erddap.cencoos.org/erddap/tabledap/tiburon-water-tibc1.html for QA/QC data with flagging.

Raw meteorological data collected with a Campbell Scientific CR-1000 weather station with wind speed, wind direction, temperature, humidity, barometric pressure, rain gauge and solar irradiation sensors. Data are raw and not flagged or curated in any manner other than curtailed for deployment periods where all sensors are functional. These data may be used and redistributed for free but they are not intended for legal use, since they may contain inaccuracies. For use for publications please reference the Central and Northern California Ocean Observing system (CeNCOOS) and NOAA. Neither the data provider, CeNCOOS, NOAA, nor the United States Government, nor any of their employees or contractors, makes any warranty, express or implied, including warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose, or assumes any legal liability for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness, or this information.

Legal Service Provider Services Market Outlook

The global market size for Legal Service Provider Services is expected to grow from $1.2 trillion in 2023 to $1.8 trillion by 2032, reflecting a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 4.5%. This impressive growth trajectory is driven by several critical factors, including increasing globalization, complex regulatory environments, and heightened demand for specialized legal expertise.

One of the primary growth factors for the legal service provider services market is the growing globalization of businesses, which necessitates more intricate and cross-border legal frameworks. As companies expand their operations internationally, they encounter a myriad of regulations and legal challenges that require specialized legal services. This increasing complexity of business operations globally drives the demand for legal service providers who can offer comprehensive solutions to navigate through multifaceted legal landscapes.

Moreover, the advent of technology has significantly transformed the legal industry, making it more efficient and accessible. Legal tech innovations, such as AI-powered legal research tools, e-discovery platforms, and contract management software, have enabled law firms and legal service providers to deliver faster and more accurate services. This technological advancement not only reduces operational costs but also enhances the overall quality of legal services, thereby contributing to market growth.

Additionally, regulatory compliance has become increasingly stringent across various industries, compelling businesses to seek professional legal assistance. From data protection laws like GDPR to industry-specific regulations in sectors such as healthcare and finance, companies are under continuous pressure to ensure compliance. This has led to an uptick in demand for regulatory compliance services, further bolstering the market for legal service providers.

In recent years, Litigation Finance has emerged as a transformative force within the legal industry. This innovative approach allows third-party investors to fund legal cases in exchange for a portion of the settlement or judgment. By providing financial backing, litigation finance enables claimants to pursue legal actions that they might otherwise be unable to afford. This has democratized access to justice, allowing individuals and businesses to challenge larger entities without bearing the full financial risk. As a result, litigation finance is becoming an increasingly popular option for both plaintiffs and law firms seeking to manage the costs and risks associated with lengthy legal battles.

Regionally, North America dominates the market with the largest share, driven by a well-established legal infrastructure and high demand from corporations. However, the Asia Pacific region is expected to exhibit the highest CAGR, fueled by rapid economic growth and increasing foreign direct investments in countries like China and India. Europe and Latin America also present substantial growth opportunities, although at a relatively moderate pace compared to Asia Pacific.

Service Type Analysis

The service type segment in the legal service provider services market covers a wide range of offerings, including Litigation, Corporate Services, Regulatory Compliance, Intellectual Property, and Others. Litigation services remain the largest segment due to the ever-present need for dispute resolution and legal representation in courts. The demand for litigation services is notably high in sectors like BFSI, healthcare, and manufacturing, where legal disputes can be particularly complex and high-stakes.

Corporate services, which include legal advisory, contract management, and mergers and acquisitions, are also experiencing significant growth. Businesses increasingly seek expert legal guidance to navigate the complexities of corporate laws, manage risks, and ensure regulatory compliance. This segment is particularly vital for large enterprises, where the stakes are high, and the legal intricacies are manifold.

Regulatory compliance services have seen a surge in demand as businesses strive to adhere to evolving local and international regulations. The increasing focus on data protection, environmental regulations, and industry-specific compliance standards, especially in the finance and healthcare sectors, drives this segment. Legal service providers specializing in regul

opendata.swiss is the central portal for open, i.e., freely accessible data from Swiss authorities (Open Government Data, OGD). The opendata.swiss portal provides users with simple and secure central access to open data from the Confederation, cantons, and municipalities. If there is a public interest, data from third parties – federal-affiliated companies and private actors commissioned by federal, cantonal, or municipal authorities – will also be published, even if they are already available on other portals. opendata.swiss is primarily intended to: The portal only contains a catalog of the available data, which is managed by the providers themselves. This avoids duplication. In general, no personal data is published within the framework of OGD. This involves aggregated and anonymized data that does not allow any conclusions to be drawn about individuals. This condition is mandatory and must be adhered to by the data providers. Would you like to publish data on opendata.swiss? Interested providers of public data can find further details in the corresponding handbook under the following link: handbook.opendata.swiss. Who manages the portal? The Open Government Data Office, which is located at the FSO, manages the portal. It supports organizations in the publication of their open data and continuously monitors the quality of the catalog. opendata.swiss was developed as part of the "Strategy for Open Government Data in Switzerland 2019–2023," which the Federal Council adopted on November 30, 2018. This strategic guideline is mandatory for the federal administration. Partner organizations: Until 2018, opendata.swiss was developed under the leadership of the Swiss Federal Archives (SFA) by various partner organizations. In 2019, the Federal Department of Home Affairs (FDHA) transferred responsibility to the Federal Statistical Office (FSO). The portal is continuously being developed in collaboration with the partner organizations. A list of all data providers is available. The following organizations support the OGD Office in the development and administration of the portal: Do you have any questions? Further information and documentation can be found on the website of the Federal Statistical Office (FSO). If you have questions about a specific dataset, please contact the contact point specified for the dataset directly. For general questions about the portal or the topic of public data, we are at your disposal. Translated from German Original Text: opendata.swiss ist das zentrale Portal für offene, d.h. frei zugängliche Daten der Schweizer Behörden (Open Government Data, OGD). Das Portal opendata.swiss gewährleistet den Nutzerinnen und Nutzern einen einfachen und sicheren zentralen Zugang zu den offenen Daten von Bund, Kantonen und Gemeinden. Sofern ein öffentliches Interesse besteht, werden auch Daten von Dritten – bundesnahe Betriebe sowie von den Bundes-, Kantons- oder Gemeindebehörden beauftragte private Akteure – veröffentlicht, selbst wenn sie bereits auf anderen Portalen enthalten sind. opendata.swiss soll in erster Linie: Das Portal enthält lediglich einen Katalog der verfügbaren Daten, die jedoch von den Anbietern selber verwaltet werden. So lassen sich Doppelspurigkeiten vermeiden. Generell werden im Rahmen der OGD keine Personendaten publiziert. Es handelt sich um aggregierte und anonymisierte Daten, die keine Rückschlüsse auf Einzelpersonen zulassen. Diese Bedingung ist zwingend und muss von den Datenanbietern eingehalten werden. Möchten Sie Daten auf opendata.swiss publizieren? Interessierte Anbieter öffentlicher Daten finden weitere Einzelheiten im entsprechenden Handbuch unter folgendem Link: handbook.opendata.swiss. Wer verwaltet das Portal? Die Geschäftsstelle Open Government Data, die beim BFS angesiedelt ist, verwaltet das Portal. Sie unterstützt die Organisationen bei der Publikation ihrer offenen Daten und überwacht fortlaufend die Qualität des Katalogs. opendata.swiss wurde im Rahmen der «Strategie für offene Verwaltungsdaten in der Schweiz 2019–2023», die der Bundesrat am 30. November 2018 verabschiedet hat, entwickelt. Diese strategische Vorgabe ist für die Bundesverwaltung verpflichtend. Partnerorganisationen opendata.swiss wurde bis 2018 unter der Federführung des Schweizerischen Bundesarchivs (BAR) von verschiedenen Partnerorganisationen entwickelt. 2019 hat das Eidgenössische Departement des Innern (EDI) die Verantwortung an das Bundesamt für Statistik (BFS) übertragen. Das Portal wird in Zusammenarbeit mit den Partnerorganisationen laufend weiterentwickelt. Eine Liste aller Datenanbieter steht zur Verfügung. Die nachfolgenden Organisationen unterstützen die OGD-Geschäftsstelle bei der Entwicklung und Verwaltung des Portals: Haben Sie Fragen? Weitere Informationen sowie die Dokumentation finden Sie auf der Website des Bundesamtes für Statistik (BFS). Wenn Sie Fragen zu einem spezifischen Datensatz haben, wenden Sie sich bitte direkt an die für den Datensatz angegebene Kontaktstelle. Bei allgemeinen Fragen zum Portal oder zum Thema öffentliche Daten stehen wir gerne zu Ihrer Verfügung.

In case of an emergency, all dams are required to have a map of areas that would be inundated in the event of a dam failure. This dataset is a digital version of those areas within Kern County to be used for planning purposes.Use limitations Summary: This disclaimer statement requires the data recipient to receive the data "as is" with no warranty, and to hold all data providers not liable for any losses or damages caused by use of the data. The statement also requires the data recipient to not distribute any portion of the data without a copy of this disclaimer statement. Whereas the Kern Geographic Information Network (Kern GEONET) and its members and other agencies have developed digital geographic data herein referred to as "the Data." Whereas the entity or entities acquiring a copy the Data are herein referred to as "the Recipient." Whereas the Kern Geographic Information Network and its members, Kern Council of Governments and its member agencies, and other agencies that have developed and contributed the Data which is being transmitted to the Recipient by these agencies are herein referred to as "the Data Providers."

I. Disclaimer of Liability and Warranties A. The Recipient understands and agrees that it is possible that errors and omissions will occur in data input or programming done by the Data Providers to provide the data in the form desired. The Recipient further understands and agrees that it is probable that errors and omissions will occur in record keeping processes, especially when large numbers of records are developed and maintained, and that data may not meet the Recipient's standards as to accuracy or completeness. Notwithstanding, the Recipient agrees to take the data "as is", fully expecting that there may be errors and omissions associated with the data. B. The Recipient further understands and agrees that the Data Providers make absolutely no warranty whatsoever, whether expressed or implied, as to the accuracy, thoroughness, value, quality, validity, merchantability, suitability, condition or fitness for a particular purpose of the data or any programming used to obtain the data, nor as to whether the data are error-free, up-to-date, complete or based upon accurate or meaningful facts. C. The Recipient further understands and agrees that it will forever waive any and all rights, claims, causes of action or other recourse that it might otherwise have against the Data Providers for any injuries or damages of any type, whether direct, indirect, incidental, consequential or otherwise, resulting from any error or omission in the data or in any programming used to obtain the data, or in any manner arising out of or related to this agreement or the data provided hereunder. The Recipient agrees that the Data Providers shall not be liable to the Recipient for any liability, claim, loss, damage, injury or expense of any kind caused or alleged to be caused, directly or indirectly, by the inadequacy of data obtained from the Data Providers, by any deficiency of the Data Providers or the Recipient systems, by any delay or failure to provide any service, or by any other interruption, disruption or loss of the Recipient operations. II. Indemnification A. The Recipient agrees that it will provide no copy or partial copy of any data to any other party, including consultants under contract with The Recipient, without disclosing that the copy or partial copy was obtained from the Data Providers and without attaching the Disclaimer of Liability and Warranties paragraph. B. The Recipient hereby agrees to defend, save, hold harmless and indemnify the Data Providers and signatories to its data sharing agreements and its/their officers, employees and agents against claims by anyone for any loss, injury, damage, risk, cause of action, or liability of any type (including legal fees) incurred by the Recipient or any other person, relating to or arising out of the subject matter of this agreement, or which may be alleged to have been caused, either directly or indirectly, by the acts, conduct, omissions, negligence or lack of good faith of the Data Providers, their officers, agents or employees.

This package provides information about municipal and social housing rented by Klaipeda Municipality: housing characteristics, rental conditions and tenants. Each row of the table corresponds to one lease agreement concluded with Klaipeda Municipality. The dataset is kept up-to-date, covering the period from the start of the data collection to the present. All data shall be provided in accordance with the legal requirements for the opening of data and therefore certain values relating to the identification of the person shall be encrypted. Data provider – “Klaipėda apartments”. Contact the atverimas@stat.gov.lt for technical questions or possible errors.

Note:- Only publicly available Legal data can be worked upon.

Unlock a world of legal information with APISCRAPY's user-friendly services – Federal Court Data, State Court Record Data, legal data scraping, and PACER Data. We've made it simple for anyone, from legal professionals to researchers and businesses, to access over 100 million publicly available legal records.

Our Federal Court Data service provides details on federal legal matters, while State Court Record Data gives insights into state-level legal proceedings. With our legal data scraping capabilities, we ensure you have access to the information you need without any hassle. Plus, our integration with PACER Data ensures a comprehensive and reliable source for legal records.

Key Features:

Federal Court Data: Get insights into legal matters at the federal level, all at your fingertips.

State Court Record Data: Access information on legal proceedings at the state level, tailored to your specific needs.

Legal Data Scraping Made Easy: We've simplified the process of gathering legal data, making it accessible for everyone.

PACER Data Integration: Our platform integrates seamlessly with PACER Data, ensuring a reliable and complete source of legal records.

Over 100 Million Records: APISCRAPY provides access to a vast database of over 100 million publicly available legal records, offering unparalleled insights.

Whether you're a legal professional, researcher, or business looking for easy access to legal information, APISCRAPY's services cater to your needs. Choose us for straightforward and comprehensive legal data services, where simplicity and accessibility meet for your convenience.

[ Related Tags: public court records, online court records, federal court cases, Federal court case number search, find Federal court cases, court case by state, court Datasets, state court data, supreme court data, USA court datasets, Federal Court Data API , Litigation Data, Legal Data, Legal API, Legal Law, Legal Court records, Crime records, County court Datasets, All county court Datasets, Legal Analytics, Legal Intelligence, Legal Research, Attorney Data, Legal Parties Data, Judge Data, Case Research, Data Integration, US legal Data API, pacer case locator, pacer court records, free pacer search, pacer criminal case search, federal courts pacer, pacer API , pacer case locator free ]

This publication provides the most timely picture available of people using NHS funded secondary mental health, learning disabilities and autism services in England. These are experimental statistics which are undergoing development and evaluation. This information will be of use to people needing access to information quickly for operational decision making and other purposes. More detailed information on the quality and completeness of these statistics is made available later in our Mental Health Bulletin: Annual Report publication series. • COVID-19 and the production of statistics Due to the coronavirus illness (COVID-19) disruption, it would seem that this is now starting to affect the quality and coverage of some of our statistics, such as an increase in non-submissions for some datasets. We are also starting to see some different patterns in the submitted data. For example, fewer patients are being referred to hospital and more appointments being carried out via phone/telemedicine/email. Therefore, data should be interpreted with care over the COVID-19 period. • Delayed measures For the Performance September 2020 publication some of the measures due for release were delayed for operational reasons. The below measures were made available 18 December 2020: - The monthly outputs, Access and Waiting Times measures (ED32, all EIPxx, MHS32 quarterly). - The quarterly output, Mental Health Services Selected NHS England Measures. - The quarterly output, Women in contact with Mental Health Services who were new or expectant mothers. One set of measures remains unpublished, 72 hour follow-up measures (MHS78, MHS79 and MHS80); these will be published as soon as they are available. NHS Digital apologises for the inconvenience caused. • Early release of statistics To support the ongoing COVID-19 work, October 2020 monthly statistics were made available early and presented on our supplementary information pages. https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/supplementary-information/2020/provisional-october-2020-mental-health-statistics • Changing existing measures The move to MHSDS version 4.1 from April 2020 has brought with it changes to the dataset; the construction of a number of measures have been changed as a result. Improvements in the methodology of reporting delay of discharge has also resulted in a change in the construction of the measure from the April 2020 publication onwards. From August 2020 onwards, the methodology for calculating restrictive interventions (MHS76 and MHS77) in the reporting month has been updated to include all restraints that span several months. Previously the measure only includes restraints that started or ended in the month and did not include those spanning more than 2 months. This change predominately impacts segregation. From September 2020 onwards, the methodology for MHS26 (Delayed transfer of care) has been updated. Previously only the first midnight of a delayed transfer of care within a hospital provider spell was excluded. The updated methodology now excludes the first midnight for delay start date where there is a gap of more than one day within the same hospital provider spell. This is to take into account valid gaps between delay reasons. Full details of these changes are available in the associated Metadata file. From September 2020 onwards, a presentational change has been introduced to restrictive interventions csv files to exclude providers with no inpatients. • New measures A number of new measures have been included from the July 2020 publication onwards: - MHS81 Number of Detentions - MHS82 Number of Short Term Orders - MHS83 Number of uses of Section 136 - MHS84 Number of Community Treatment Orders Full details of these are available in the associated Metadata file. • CCG and STP changes A number of changes to NHS organisations were made operationally effective from 1 April 2020. These changes included: 74 former Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs) merging to form 18 new CCGs; alterations to commissioning hubs; provider mergers; and the incorporation of Sustainability and Transformation Partnerships (STPs) into the NHS commissioning hierarchy. The Organisation Data Service (ODS) is responsible for publishing organisation and practitioner codes, along with related national policies and standards. A series of ODS data amendments are required to support the introduction of these changes. This would normally result in a number of organisations becoming ‘legally’ closed including the 74 former CCGs. However, to minimise any burden to the NHS during the COVID-19 pandemic and remove any non-critical activity, these organisations remain open within ODS data. ODS aim to both legally and operationally close predecessor organisations involved in April 2020 Reconfiguration on 30 September 2020. Activity may be recorded against either former or current organisations, depending on data providers and processors ability to transition to the new organisation codes at this time. The same activity will not be recorded against both former and current organisations. There is no impact on the statistics presented here as CCG is derived in all cases within this publication.

The Alternative Legal Service Providers (ALSP) market is experiencing robust growth, driven by increasing demand for cost-effective and efficient legal solutions across diverse sectors. Law firms, enterprises, and government agencies are increasingly outsourcing non-core legal functions to ALSPs, leveraging their specialized expertise and technological capabilities. This trend is particularly pronounced in North America and Europe, which currently hold the largest market shares. The market is segmented by application (Law Firm, Enterprise, Government, Others) and type of ALSP (Law Firm Captives, Independent ALSPs, Big Four Legal Service Providers, Others). The rise of legal technology and process automation is a key driver, enabling ALSPs to deliver services faster and at lower costs. Furthermore, the increasing complexity of legal regulations and the need for specialized skills are fueling the demand for ALSP services. Competition is intense, with established players like QuisLex, UnitedLex, and Thomson Reuters vying for market share alongside emerging independent ALSPs and Big Four firms expanding their legal service offerings. The growth is expected to continue, driven by factors like globalization and the increasing adoption of new technologies within the legal industry. Specific regional growth rates will vary, influenced by factors such as regulatory environments and technological adoption rates. While precise figures for market size and CAGR were not provided, a reasonable estimation can be made based on industry reports and the given time frame (2019-2033). Assuming a current market size (2025) of $15 billion (a conservative estimate given the substantial growth and the number of players involved), and a CAGR of 10% (a realistic figure given market dynamics), the market is projected to reach approximately $39 billion by 2033. This growth will be fueled by increasing adoption of ALSP services across different sectors and geographies, along with continuous technological advancements enabling enhanced efficiency and cost reduction. However, potential restraints include economic downturns, data security concerns, and the need for robust client trust and relationship building in this dynamic sector. Despite these challenges, the long-term outlook for the ALSP market remains highly positive, with considerable opportunities for both established players and new entrants.

Legal Hold Software Market Outlook

The global legal hold software market size was valued at approximately USD 1.2 billion in 2023 and is projected to reach around USD 3.5 billion by 2032, growing at a robust CAGR of 12.5% during the forecast period. This impressive growth is driven by increasing regulatory requirements and the need for efficient data management solutions in legal contexts.

One of the primary growth factors for the legal hold software market is the escalating complexities and volumes of litigation and investigations in today's business environment. The need for organizations to comply with various regulations and legal obligations has necessitated the adoption of sophisticated legal hold software. This software helps in efficiently preserving relevant data and ensuring compliance with legal requirements, thereby mitigating risks associated with data loss and non-compliance penalties. The increasing awareness about data privacy and protection further bolsters the market growth.

Another significant driver is the growing trend of digital transformation across industries. As more organizations shift towards digital operations, the volume of electronically stored information (ESI) has surged. Legal hold software provides an effective means to manage and secure this ever-growing amount of data, ensuring that relevant information is preserved for legal proceedings and investigations. Additionally, advancements in artificial intelligence and machine learning have enhanced the capabilities of these software solutions, making them more efficient and user-friendly, which in turn propels market growth.

Moreover, the COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the adoption of remote working and digital tools, including legal hold software. With employees working from various locations, the need for robust legal hold solutions has become even more critical. The pandemic has also led to an increase in the number of disputes and litigations, further driving the demand for these software solutions. Organizations are now more inclined towards investing in comprehensive legal hold software to ensure seamless and compliant operations in the new normal.

Regionally, North America dominates the legal hold software market, followed by Europe and Asia Pacific. The strong presence of major legal hold software providers, coupled with stringent regulatory frameworks, makes North America a significant market. However, the Asia Pacific region is expected to witness the highest growth rate during the forecast period, driven by increasing awareness about data compliance and the rising adoption of digital tools among enterprises. Rapid economic development and the presence of a large number of SMEs in the region also contribute to market growth.

Component Analysis

The legal hold software market by component is segmented into software and services. The software segment holds the largest share in the market, owing to the high demand for advanced legal hold solutions that can effectively manage and preserve electronically stored information (ESI). Legal hold software offers numerous features such as data collection, preservation, and management, which are essential for compliance with legal and regulatory requirements. The increasing complexities of legal cases and investigations have further fueled the demand for sophisticated legal hold software solutions.

Within the software segment, cloud-based solutions are witnessing significant growth due to their scalability, flexibility, and cost-effectiveness. Organizations are increasingly adopting cloud-based legal hold software to leverage its benefits, such as easy accessibility, reduced IT infrastructure costs, and enhanced collaboration capabilities. Furthermore, advancements in cloud technology and the growing trend of digital transformation across industries are driving the adoption of cloud-based legal hold software.

On the other hand, the services segment is also expected to grow at a substantial rate during the forecast period. Services such as consulting, implementation, and training are crucial for the successful deployment and operation of legal hold software. Organizations often require expert guidance to understand and navigate the complexities of legal and regulatory requirements, which drives the demand for professional services. Additionally, ongoing support and maintenance services ensure the smooth functioning of legal hold software, thereby enhancing its overall value proposition.

Integration services are particularly important as organizati

The Legal Analytics market is experiencing robust growth, projected to reach $2.72 billion in 2025 and maintain a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 15.92% from 2025 to 2033. This expansion is driven by several key factors. Firstly, the increasing volume and complexity of legal data necessitate sophisticated analytical tools for efficient case management, due diligence, and risk assessment. Secondly, the adoption of cloud-based solutions is streamlining workflows and reducing IT infrastructure costs for law firms and corporate legal departments. Finally, the growing demand for predictive analytics to anticipate legal outcomes and optimize strategic decision-making is fueling market growth. This demand is particularly strong in sectors like legal firms and corporate firms, with North America and Europe currently representing the largest market segments. The market is segmented by tools (predictive and descriptive analytics) and deployment modes (cloud and on-premise), offering diverse solutions to meet varied needs. While the on-premise model continues to serve established players, the cloud-based segment is experiencing faster growth, driven by scalability, accessibility, and cost-effectiveness. The competitive landscape is marked by a mix of established players like Wolters Kluwer and Thomson Reuters, and innovative technology companies such as Everlaw and LexisNexis, fostering innovation and competition. The continued expansion of the Legal Analytics market hinges on technological advancements, particularly in areas like artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML), which enhance the accuracy and efficiency of analytical processes. Furthermore, increasing regulatory compliance requirements across various industries are driving the adoption of legal analytics solutions to ensure conformity and mitigate risks. However, challenges such as data security concerns, high implementation costs associated with certain solutions, and the need for specialized skills to effectively utilize these tools could potentially hinder market growth to some extent. Despite these challenges, the overall outlook for the Legal Analytics market remains highly positive, with significant growth opportunities in emerging markets and across various industry verticals. The market’s trajectory points towards greater sophistication, integration, and accessibility of legal analytics, ultimately transforming how legal professionals manage information and make strategic decisions. Recent developments include: February 2023 - Aderant, a software provider for law firms, collaborated with Apperioa London-based legal analytics company. This partnership will provide clients with critical insight into billing status and faster returns on payment, thereby improving billing transparency and reducing invoice friction. The clients will have visibility into the work in process that will strengthen the trust and overall business relationship with Apperioa., May 2022 - Thomson Reuters launched AI-powered Legal Tracker to analyze and manage expenses and operational efficiencies for corporate legal departments. Legal departments can provide legal services by exploring the Legal Tracker's network of over 66,000 law firms, extensive price data, and sophisticated analytics., April 2022 - Lex Machina, part of LexisNexis and a provider of legal analytics, launched an analytics platform called Appellate Analytics that will deal with legal appeals. Close to 0.4 million circuit court cases from all 13 federal circuits will be accessible to clients using Appellate Analytics. Users will gain insights, including judge reversal rates, appeals resolutions, and appealability rulings.. Key drivers for this market are: Growing Demand for Automation in Legal Analytics for Data-Driven Decision Making, Increase in Productivity and Revenue of Law Firms. Potential restraints include: Growing Demand for Automation in Legal Analytics for Data-Driven Decision Making, Increase in Productivity and Revenue of Law Firms. Notable trends are: Contract Management Offers Potential Growth.

Summary The City and County of San Francisco contracts with hundreds of nonprofit organizations to provide services for San Franciscans. These services include healthcare, legal aid, shelter, children’s programming, and more. This dataset contains all payments issued to nonprofit organizations by City departments since FY2019. This dataset will be updated at the close of each fiscal year. The underlying data is pulled from Supplier Payments on SF OpenBook. Please use SF OpenBook to find current-year data. The data in this dataset are presented in easy-to-read dashboards on our website. View the dashboards here: https://www.sf.gov/data/san-francisco-nonprofit-contracts-and-spending. How the dataset is created The Controller’s Office performs several significant data cleaning steps before uploading this dataset to the SF Open Data Portal. Please read the cleaning steps below: Cleaning Steps 1. SF OpenBook provides a filter labeled “Non-Profits Only” (Yes, No), and resulting datasets exported from SF OpenBook include a “Non Profit” column to indicate whether the supplier is a nonprofit (Yes, Blank). However, this field is not always accurate and excludes about 150 known nonprofits that are not labeled as a nonprofit in the City’s financial system. To ensure a complete dataset, we exported a full list of supplier payment data from SF OpenBook with the “Non-Profits Only” field filtered to “No” which provides a list of all supplier payments regardless of nonprofit status. We cleaned this data by adding a new “Nonprofit” column within the dataset and used this column to note a nonprofit status of “Yes” for approximately 150 known nonprofit suppliers without this indicator flagged in the financial system in addition to any nonprofits already accurately flagged in the system. We then filtered the full dataset using the new nonprofit column and used the filtered data for all of the dashboards on the webpage linked above. The list of excluded nonprofits may change over time as information gets updated in the City’s data system. Download the cleaned and updated dataset on the City’s Open Data Portal, which includes all of the known nonprofits. While the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) is technically not-for-profit, a university’s financial management is very different from traditional nonprofit service providers, and the City’s agreement with UCSF includes hospital staffing in addition to contracted services to the public. As such, the Controller's Office created a nonprofit column to be able to exclude payments to UCSF when reporting on overall spending. There are divisions of UCSF that provide more traditional contracted services, but these cannot be clearly identified in the data. Note that filtering out this data may reflect an underrepresentation of overall spending. The Controller's Office also excludes several specific contracts that are predominately “pass through” payments where the nonprofit provider receives funds that they disperse to other agencies, such as for childcare or workforce subsidies. These types of contracts are substantially different from contracts where the nonprofit is providing direct services to San Franciscans. Update process This dataset will be manually updated after year-end financial processing is complete, typically in September. There may be a delay between the end of the fiscal year and the publication of this dataset.

The table contains data on consents issued by the National Land Service under the Ministry of Environment to acquire agricultural and forestry parcels. The set is compiled by the State Data Agency. The data shall be provided from the moment applications become relevant for the verification process. One line of the table corresponds to one requisition. Please note that the data series are constantly filled in and the information is updated on them. The data includes legal and natural persons located throughout Lithuania. Data time coverage: from 1 January 2022. Data Provider – National Land Service under the Ministry of Environment Contact the atverimas@stat.gov.lt for technical questions or possible errors

Canadian data processing and hosting services are in a phase of rapid transformation driven by increasing reliance on cloud computing, accelerated digital demand, combined with a pressing need for robust cybersecurity measures. Datacenter owners have benefited from substantial public sector support, particularly tax breaks and subsidies, aligning the sector's growth trajectory with national economic priorities. These support mechanisms have allowed datacenter companies to build large data complexes, critical for sustaining the new digital economy's infrastructure, and helping the industry to grow at a dramatic CAGR of 8.8% to $16.1 billion in 2024, when revenue will expand 1.4% and profit will center at 7.6%. The rise in cloud computing has been a watershed moment, redefining how businesses manage and access their data. Data processors benefit as companies continue to outsource IT needs to streamline operations and cut costs. The market's crowded nature and high barriers to entry, such as legal compliance and startup costs, make differentiation necessary. Leading companies are navigating these challenges by pivoting to niche markets like healthcare and defense that require specialized compliance and security features. Competition dynamics also hinge on the power balance between buyers and suppliers. High buyer power is evident, particularly from sectors like IT consulting and software publishing, driving data providers to secure long-term contracts and customizable solutions to reduce churn. Meanwhile, hardware suppliers exert significant influence, particularly in segments requiring advanced technologies like AI. Some industry leaders are advancing toward vertical integration by developing proprietary hardware to mitigate this. The Canadian data processing landscape anticipates moderate but steady growth at a CAGR of 1.5% and will attempt to reach $17.4 billion. Embracing emerging technologies such as AI and machine learning will be crucial for success. Moreover, focusing on sustainability through renewable energy sources can help manage operational costs while enhancing corporate reputation. Providing scalable, secure, and innovative data solutions will empower operators to meet domestic and international client demands, ensuring competitiveness and resilience in an increasingly digital world.

Cloud Data Sovereignty Market Outlook

According to our latest research, the Cloud Data Sovereignty market size reached USD 16.7 billion in 2024 globally, demonstrating a robust growth trajectory. The market is projected to expand at a CAGR of 17.2% from 2025 to 2033, reaching an estimated USD 55.1 billion by 2033. This surge is fueled by increasing regulatory scrutiny over data localization, the proliferation of cross-border cloud services, and growing enterprise awareness regarding data jurisdiction risks. As organizations worldwide migrate critical workloads to the cloud, the imperative to comply with local data residency laws is driving unprecedented demand for cloud data sovereignty solutions and services.

The primary growth factor propelling the cloud data sovereignty market is the intensification of global data protection regulations. Regulations such as the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), China’s Cybersecurity Law, and similar mandates in India, Brazil, and other jurisdictions, require organizations to store and process data within specific geographic boundaries. These regulations are not only increasing compliance complexities for multinational corporations but are also compelling cloud service providers to tailor their offerings to meet regional legal requirements. As a result, enterprises are seeking advanced data sovereignty solutions that ensure compliance, minimize legal risks, and maintain uninterrupted business operations in an increasingly fragmented regulatory landscape.

Another significant driver is the exponential growth in cloud adoption across industries, particularly in sectors handling sensitive or regulated data such as BFSI, healthcare, and government. The shift toward digital transformation and remote work models has accelerated cloud usage, amplifying concerns over data control and sovereignty. Cloud data sovereignty solutions enable organizations to retain granular control over where and how their data is stored, processed, and accessed, thereby addressing critical issues related to data privacy, security, and compliance. This is particularly vital for enterprises operating in multiple jurisdictions, where data transfer and residency requirements can vary widely and non-compliance can result in severe penalties.

Technological advancements in cloud infrastructure, such as the rise of multi-cloud and hybrid cloud strategies, are also contributing to market expansion. Organizations are increasingly adopting hybrid and multi-cloud architectures to optimize performance, cost, and flexibility. However, these architectures introduce complexities in managing data residency and compliance across disparate environments. Cloud data sovereignty solutions are evolving to provide unified visibility, policy enforcement, and audit capabilities across public, private, and hybrid clouds. This technological evolution is empowering organizations to confidently innovate and scale their cloud operations while maintaining strict adherence to data sovereignty mandates.

From a regional perspective, Europe remains the dominant market for cloud data sovereignty, driven by stringent regulatory frameworks such as GDPR and the Digital Sovereignty Act. North America follows closely, with the United States and Canada witnessing increased regulatory activity and enterprise investment in compliance solutions. The Asia Pacific region is emerging as a high-growth market, propelled by rapid digitalization, evolving data protection laws, and the expansion of cloud service providers. Latin America and the Middle East & Africa are also witnessing steady adoption, particularly among government and public sector organizations prioritizing data localization and security. This regional diversification underscores the global imperative for robust cloud data sovereignty strategies.

Component Analysis

The component segment of the cloud data sovereignty market is bifurcated into solutions and services, each playing a pivotal role in enabling organizations to achieve compliance and manage data residency requirements. Solutions encompass software platforms and tools designed to facilitate data localization, encryption, access control, and policy enforcement. These solutions are increasingly integrated with broader cloud management platforms, offering seamless orchestration of data flows across multiple jurisdictions. As regulatory requirements become more nuanced, solution providers are enhancing their offerings with advanced analytics, re

Financial Data Services Market size was valued at USD 23.3 Billion in 2023 and is projected to reach USD 42.6 Billion by 2031, growing at a CAGR of 8.1% during the forecast period 2024-2031.Global Financial Data Services Market DriversThe market drivers for the Financial Data Services Market can be influenced by various factors. These may include:The need for real-time analytics is growing: Real-time analytics are becoming more and more necessary in the financial sector due to the acceleration of data consumption. To reduce risks, make wise decisions, and enhance customer service, organizations need quick insights. Stakeholders are giving priority to solutions that enable quick data processing and analysis due to the increase in market volatility and complexity. The need for sophisticated analytical skills is driving providers of financial data services to modernize their products. As companies come to realize that using real-time data is crucial for keeping a competitive edge in a fast-paced financial climate, the competition among them to provide timely insights also boosts market growth.Growing Machine Learning and AI Adoption: Data analysis has been profoundly changed by the incorporation of AI and machine learning technology into financial data services. By enabling predictive analytics, these technologies help financial organizations make better decisions and reduce risk. Businesses can find trends that were previously invisible by automating data processing operations. This leads to more precise forecasts and improved investment plans. Furthermore, sophisticated algorithms are flexible enough to adjust to shifting circumstances, keeping organizations flexible. The increasing intricacy of financial markets necessitates the use of AI and machine learning, which in turn drives demand for sophisticated financial data services and promotes innovation in the sector.Global Financial Data Services Market RestraintsSeveral factors can act as restraints or challenges for the Financial Data Services Market. These may include:Difficulties in Regulatory Compliance: Regulations controlling data management, privacy, and financial transactions place heavy restrictions on the financial data services market. Regulations like the GDPR, CCPA, and banking industry standards like Basel III and SOX must all be complied with by organizations. Complying with these requirements frequently necessitates a significant investment in staff and compliance systems, which can be taxing, especially for smaller businesses. Regulations are dynamic, and different locations have different needs, which adds to the complexity and expense. Noncompliance not only results in monetary fines but also has the potential to harm an entity's image, so impeding market expansion.Dangers to Data Security: Threats to data security are a major impediment to the financial data services market. Because they manage sensitive data, financial institutions are often the targets of cyberattacks. Breach can lead to significant monetary losses, legal repercussions, and long-term harm to one's image. Although they can greatly increase operating expenses, investments in strong security measures like encryption, safe access protocols, and continual monitoring are crucial. Moreover, the dynamic strategies employed by cybercriminals need continuous adjustment, placing a burden on resources and detracting from the main operations of businesses. The evolution of security threats poses a challenge to preserving consumer trust, hence impeding industry expansion.