Graph and download economic data for Government current expenditures: Federal: General public service: Interest payments (G160441A027NBEA) from 1959 to 2023 about public, payments, expenditures, federal, government, services, interest, GDP, and USA.

This dataset contains data collected during a study "Smarter open government data for Society 5.0: are your open data smart enough" (Sensors. 2021; 21(15):5204) conducted by Anastasija Nikiforova (University of Latvia). It being made public both to act as supplementary data for "Smarter open government data for Society 5.0: are your open data smart enough" paper and in order for other researchers to use these data in their own work.

The data in this dataset were collected in the result of the inspection of 60 countries and their OGD portals (total of 51 OGD portal in May 2021) to find out whether they meet the trends of Society 5.0 and Industry 4.0 obtained by conducting an analysis of relevant OGD portals.

Each portal has been studied starting with a search for a data set of interest, i.e. “real-time”, “sensor” and “covid-19”, follwing by asking a list of additional questions. These questions were formulated on the basis of combination of (1) crucial open (government) data-related aspects, including open data principles, success factors, recent studies on the topic, PSI Directive etc., (2) trends and features of Society 5.0 and Industry 4.0, (3) elements of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use Model (UTAUT).

The method used belongs to typical / daily tasks of open data portals sometimes called “usability test” – keywords related to a research question are used to filter data sets, i.e. “real-time”, “real time” and “real time”, “sensor”, covid”, “covid-19”, “corona”, “coronavirus”, “virus”. In most cases, “real-time”, “sensor” and “covid” keywords were sufficient. The examination of the respective aspects for less user-friendly portals was adapted to particular case based on the portal or data set specifics, by checking: 1. are the open data related to the topic under question ({sensor; real-time; Covid-19}) published, i.e. available? 2. are these data available in a machine-readable format? 3. are these data current, i.e. regularly updated? Where the criteria on the currency depends on the nature of data, i.e. Covid-19 data on the number of cases per day is expected to be updated daily, which won’t be sufficient for real-time data as the title supposes etc. 4. is API ensured for these data? having most importance for real-time and sensor data; 5. have they been published in a timely manner? which was verified mainly for Covid-19 related data. The timeliness is assessed by comparing the dates of the first case identified in a given country and the first release of open data on this topic. 6. what is the total number of available data sets? 7. does the open government data portal provides use-cases / showcases?
8. does the open government portal provide an opportunity to gain insight into the popularity of the data, i.e. does the portal provide statistics of this nature, such as the number of views, downloads, reuses, rating etc.? 9. is there an opportunity to provide a feedback, comment, suggestion or complaint? 10. (9a) is the artifact, i.e. feedback, comment, suggestion or complaint, visible to other users?

Format of the file .xls, .ods, .csv (for the first spreadsheet only)

Licenses or restrictions CC-BY

For more info, see README.txt

Graph and download economic data for All Employees, Federal (CES9091000001) from Jan 1939 to Jun 2025 about establishment survey, federal, government, employment, and USA.

Ministry of public Work and Housing yearly report

Government Cloud Market Outlook

The global Government Cloud market size was valued at approximately USD 26 billion in 2023 and is projected to reach around USD 78 billion by 2032, exhibiting a robust compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 12.8% during the forecast period. The growth of this market is primarily driven by the increasing demand for cost-efficient and flexible IT solutions, combined with the rising need for enhanced data security and compliance with government regulations. As governments across the globe are increasingly focusing on digital transformation, the adoption of cloud services has become essential for enhancing operational efficiency and enabling better citizen services.

The growth of the Government Cloud market is significantly influenced by the need for regulatory compliance and data security. Governments around the world are under constant pressure to maintain data sovereignty and ensure that sensitive information is stored and managed securely. Cloud solutions offer advanced security features, including data encryption, identity and access management, and threat protection, which are critical for safeguarding governmental data. Moreover, the increasing occurrence of cyber threats and data breaches necessitates the adoption of secure cloud services, driving the market further. Additionally, the COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the shift towards digitalization, compelling governments to adopt cloud technologies to maintain business continuity and provide uninterrupted public services.

The demand for scalability and flexibility is another crucial growth factor for the Government Cloud market. Cloud solutions offer the ability to easily scale IT resources, allowing government agencies to respond quickly to changing demands and manage workloads efficiently. This flexibility is particularly important for handling large volumes of data and providing seamless public services. Furthermore, cloud computing enables the integration of advanced technologies, such as artificial intelligence and machine learning, into government operations, fostering innovation and improving decision-making processes. As governments strive to enhance their service delivery and optimize resource utilization, the adoption of cloud solutions is expected to rise.

Cost efficiency is also a major driver of the Government Cloud market. Traditional IT infrastructure involves significant capital expenditures and ongoing maintenance costs, which can be a financial burden for government agencies. Cloud services offer a more cost-effective alternative by allowing governments to pay only for the resources they use, thus reducing upfront investments and operational expenses. Additionally, cloud solutions eliminate the need for physical hardware and infrastructure, further lowering costs. This economic advantage is particularly appealing to governments facing budget constraints and seeking to maximize the value of public funds.

Solution Analysis

The Government Cloud market is segmented by solution into Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS), Platform as a Service (PaaS), and Software as a Service (SaaS). Each of these solutions offers distinct advantages that cater to the specific needs of government agencies. IaaS provides a virtualized computing infrastructure over the internet, allowing governments to access and manage computing resources without the burden of maintaining physical hardware. This solution is particularly beneficial for agencies looking to quickly scale their IT resources and reduce capital expenditures. It also offers high levels of customization, making it suitable for a wide range of applications within the public sector.

Platform as a Service (PaaS) is another critical component of the Government Cloud market. PaaS offers a platform that allows government agencies to develop, run, and manage applications without the complexity of building and maintaining the underlying infrastructure. This solution is ideal for fostering innovation and accelerating the development of new applications and services. By providing pre-built software components and tools, PaaS enables agencies to streamline their development processes, reduce time-to-market, and focus on delivering value-added services to citizens. Moreover, PaaS supports the integration of cutting-edge technologies, such as AI and IoT, enhancing the capabilities of government applications.

Software as a Service (SaaS) is a pivotal solution in the Government Cloud market, offering ready-to-use applications that can be accessed over the internet. SaaS eliminates the need for local installation and maintenance, allowing go

GDP from Public Administration in the United States increased to 2666.10 USD Billion in the first quarter of 2025 from 2653.10 USD Billion in the fourth quarter of 2024. This dataset provides - United States Gdp From Government- actual values, historical data, forecast, chart, statistics, economic calendar and news.

Success.ai’s Governmental and Congressional Data with Contact Data for Government Professionals Worldwide provides businesses, organizations, and institutions with verified contact information for key decision-makers in public sector roles. Sourced from over 170 million verified professional profiles, this dataset includes work emails, direct phone numbers, and LinkedIn profiles for government officials, administrators, policy advisors, and other influential leaders. Whether you’re targeting local municipalities, national agencies, or international government bodies, Success.ai delivers accurate, up-to-date data to help you engage effectively with public sector stakeholders.

Why Choose Success.ai’s Government Professionals Data?

1. Comprehensive Contact Information
2. Access verified work emails, phone numbers, and LinkedIn profiles of government professionals worldwide.

3. AI-driven validation ensures 99% accuracy, giving you confidence in the reliability and precision of the data.

4. Global Reach Across Public Sectors

5. Includes profiles of elected officials, policy advisors, department heads, procurement managers, and regulatory authorities.

6. Covers regions such as North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, South America, and the Middle East, enabling true global engagement.

7. Continuously Updated Datasets

8. Real-time updates ensure your outreach remains timely, relevant, and aligned with current roles and responsibilities.

9. Ethical and Compliant

10. Adheres to GDPR, CCPA, and other global data privacy regulations, ensuring ethical, lawful use of all contact data.

Data Highlights:

• 170M+ Verified Professional Profiles: Includes government decision-makers and influential public sector leaders worldwide.
• 50M Work Emails: AI-validated for accuracy and easy communication.
• 30M Company (Agency/Institution) Profiles: Offers insights into various government departments, agencies, and organizations.
• 700M Global Professional Profiles: Enriched datasets to support a wide range of outreach and strategic initiatives.

Key Features of the Dataset:

1. Government Decision-Maker Profiles
2. Identify and connect with officials responsible for policy-making, budget approvals, program implementation, and public procurement.

3. Engage with professionals who influence legislation, infrastructure projects, and community development initiatives.

4. Advanced Filters for Precision Targeting

5. Filter by geographic jurisdiction, agency type, policy focus, job title, and more to reach the right government professionals.

6. Tailor your campaigns to align with specific public interests, regulatory frameworks, or service areas.

7. AI-Driven Enrichment

8. Profiles are enriched with actionable data, providing deeper insights that help you tailor your messaging and improve engagement success rates.

Strategic Use Cases:

1. Policy and Advocacy Outreach
2. Reach policymakers, advisors, and regulators to advocate for policy changes, present research findings, or share best practices.

3. Engage with officials who have the authority to influence regulations and legislative outcomes.

4. Procurement and Vendor Relations

5. Connect with procurement managers and government buyers seeking solutions, products, or services.

6. Present technology, infrastructure, or consulting offerings to decision-makers managing public tenders and supplier relationships.

7. Public-Private Partnerships

8. Identify and connect with key stakeholders involved in PPP initiatives, infrastructure projects, and long-term strategic collaborations.

9. Expand your network within government circles to foster joint ventures and co-development opportunities.

10. Market Research and Strategic Planning

11. Utilize government contact data for in-depth market research, stakeholder analysis, and feasibility assessments.

12. Gather insights from regulators, policy experts, and department heads to inform business strategies.

Why Choose Success.ai?

1. Best Price Guarantee

2. Access premium-quality verified data at competitive prices, ensuring you achieve the best value for your outreach efforts.

3. Seamless Integration

4. Integrate verified government contact data into your CRM or marketing platforms via APIs or customizable downloads, streamlining your data management.

5. Data Accuracy with AI Validation

6. Count on 99% accuracy to inform your decision-making and improve the effectiveness of each interaction.

7. Customizable and Scalable Solutions

8. Tailor datasets to specific government tiers, agency types, or policy areas to meet unique organizational requirements.

APIs for Enhanced Functionality:

1. Data Enrichment API

2. Enhance your existing records with verified government contact data, refining targeting and personalization efforts.

3. Lead Generation API

4. Automate lead generation, ensuring efficient scaling of your outreach and saving time a...

The Local Government Budget and Financial Report Database provides the public access to current and official versions of budgets for Counties, County Ag Extensions, County/City Assessors, County Hospitals, & Townships, Benefited Fire, Lighting, Water Districts, and Misc Budgets (DART, EMC, E911, Rural Improvement Zones, Recreational Water, Sanitary Sewer Districts). The public has access to multiple forms that are part of the budget. The database also provides the public access to annual financial reports for Counties. The site provides both GAAP and Cash Financial Reports for multiple fiscal years.

Provide official statistics report................

This dataset contains data collected during a study "Transparency of open data ecosystems in smart cities: Definition and assessment of the maturity of transparency in 22 smart cities" (Sustainable Cities and Society (SCS), vol.82, 103906) conducted by Martin Lnenicka (University of Pardubice), Anastasija Nikiforova (University of Tartu), Mariusz Luterek (University of Warsaw), Otmane Azeroual (German Centre for Higher Education Research and Science Studies), Dandison Ukpabi (University of Jyväskylä), Visvaldis Valtenbergs (University of Latvia), Renata Machova (University of Pardubice).

This study inspects smart cities’ data portals and assesses their compliance with transparency requirements for open (government) data by means of the expert assessment of 34 portals representing 22 smart cities, with 36 features.

It being made public both to act as supplementary data for the paper and in order for other researchers to use these data in their own work potentially contributing to the improvement of current data ecosystems and build sustainable, transparent, citizen-centered, and socially resilient open data-driven smart cities.

Purpose of the expert assessment The data in this dataset were collected in the result of the applying the developed benchmarking framework for assessing the compliance of open (government) data portals with the principles of transparency-by-design proposed by Lněnička and Nikiforova (2021)* to 34 portals that can be considered to be part of open data ecosystems in smart cities, thereby carrying out their assessment by experts in 36 features context, which allows to rank them and discuss their maturity levels and (4) based on the results of the assessment, defining the components and unique models that form the open data ecosystem in the smart city context.

Methodology Sample selection: the capitals of the Member States of the European Union and countries of the European Economic Area were selected to ensure a more coherent political and legal framework. They were mapped/cross-referenced with their rank in 5 smart city rankings: IESE Cities in Motion Index, Top 50 smart city governments (SCG), IMD smart city index (SCI), global cities index (GCI), and sustainable cities index (SCI). A purposive sampling method and systematic search for portals was then carried out to identify relevant websites for each city using two complementary techniques: browsing and searching. To evaluate the transparency maturity of data ecosystems in smart cities, we have used the transparency-by-design framework (Lněnička & Nikiforova, 2021)*. The benchmarking supposes the collection of quantitative data, which makes this task an acceptability task. A six-point Likert scale was applied for evaluating the portals. Each sub-dimension was supplied with its description to ensure the common understanding, a drop-down list to select the level at which the respondent (dis)agree, and a comment to be provided, which has not been mandatory. This formed a protocol to be fulfilled on every portal. Each sub-dimension/feature was assessed using a six-point Likert scale, where strong agreement is assessed with 6 points, while strong disagreement is represented by 1 point. Each website (portal) was evaluated by experts, where a person is considered to be an expert if a person works with open (government) data and data portals daily, i.e., it is the key part of their job, which can be public officials, researchers, and independent organizations. In other words, compliance with the expert profile according to the International Certification of Digital Literacy (ICDL) and its derivation proposed in Lněnička et al. (2021)* is expected to be met. When all individual protocols were collected, mean values and standard deviations (SD) were calculated, and if statistical contradictions/inconsistencies were found, reassessment took place to ensure individual consistency and interrater reliability among experts’ answers. *Lnenicka, M., & Nikiforova, A. (2021). Transparency-by-design: What is the role of open data portals?. Telematics and Informatics, 61, 101605 *Lněnička, M., Machova, R., Volejníková, J., Linhartová, V., Knezackova, R., & Hub, M. (2021). Enhancing transparency through open government data: the case of data portals and their features and capabilities. Online Information Review.

Test procedure (1) perform an assessment of each dimension using sub-dimensions, mapping out the achievement of each indicator (2) all sub-dimensions in one dimension are aggregated, and then the average value is calculated based on the number of sub-dimensions – the resulting average stands for a dimension value - eight values per portal (3) the average value from all dimensions are calculated and then mapped to the maturity level – this value of each portal is also used to rank the portals.

Description of the data in this data set Sheet#1 "comparison_overall" provides results by portal Sheet#2 "comparison_category" provides results by portal and category Sheet#3 "category_subcategory" provides list of categories and its elements

Format of the file .xls

Licenses or restrictions CC-BY

For more info, see README.txt

Venezuela Central Government: Total Expenditure: Current: Transfers Expenditure: Public Transfers: To State and Local Governments data was reported at 20,791,718.643 VEF th in 2009. This records an increase from the previous number of 19,673,829.554 VEF th for 2008. Venezuela Central Government: Total Expenditure: Current: Transfers Expenditure: Public Transfers: To State and Local Governments data is updated yearly, averaging 5,066,676.551 VEF th from Dec 1998 (Median) to 2009, with 12 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 20,791,718.643 VEF th in 2009 and a record low of 1,557,007.263 VEF th in 1998. Venezuela Central Government: Total Expenditure: Current: Transfers Expenditure: Public Transfers: To State and Local Governments data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Ministry of Economy, Finance and Public Banking. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Venezuela – Table VE.F002: Central Government: Revenue and Expenditure: Annual.

Government spending in the United States was last recorded at 39.7 percent of GDP in 2024 . This dataset provides - United States Government Spending To Gdp- actual values, historical data, forecast, chart, statistics, economic calendar and news.

Actual Government External Debt Payments: Principal: New Russian Debt: Federal Government data was reported at 0.440 USD bn in Sep 2018. This records an increase from the previous number of 0.070 USD bn for Jun 2018. Actual Government External Debt Payments: Principal: New Russian Debt: Federal Government data is updated quarterly, averaging 0.740 USD bn from Mar 2000 (Median) to Sep 2018, with 75 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 4.690 USD bn in Mar 2005 and a record low of 0.030 USD bn in Sep 2017. Actual Government External Debt Payments: Principal: New Russian Debt: Federal Government data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by The Central Bank of the Russian Federation. The data is categorized under Russia Premium Database’s Government and Public Finance – Table RU.FH004: Actual Public External Debt Payments: Principal.

Actual Government External Debt Payments: Interest: New Russian Debt: Local Government data was reported at 0.010 USD bn in Sep 2018. This stayed constant from the previous number of 0.010 USD bn for Jun 2018. Actual Government External Debt Payments: Interest: New Russian Debt: Local Government data is updated quarterly, averaging 0.010 USD bn from Mar 2000 (Median) to Sep 2018, with 75 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 0.100 USD bn in Dec 2011 and a record low of 0.000 USD bn in Mar 2018. Actual Government External Debt Payments: Interest: New Russian Debt: Local Government data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by The Central Bank of the Russian Federation. The data is categorized under Russia Premium Database’s Government and Public Finance – Table RU.FH005: Actual Public External Debt Payments: Interest.

Key Table Information.Table Title.Government Units: U.S. and State: Census Years 1942 - 2022.Table ID.GOVSTIMESERIES.CG00ORG01.Survey/Program.Public Sector.Year.2024.Dataset.PUB Public Sector Annual Surveys and Census of Governments.Source.U.S. Census Bureau, Public Sector.Release Date.2023-08-24.Release Schedule.For information about Census of Governments planned data product releases, see https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/gus/newsroom/updates.html.Dataset Universe.Census of Governments - Organization (CG):The universe of this file is all federal, state, and local government units in the United States. In addition to the federal government and the 50 state governments, the Census Bureau recognizes five basic types of local governments. The government types are: County, Municipal, Township, Special District, and School District. Of these five types, three are categorized as General Purpose governments: County, municipal, and township governments are readily recognized and generally present no serious problem of classification. However, legislative provisions for school district and special district governments are diverse. These two types are categorized as Special Purpose governments. Numerous single-function and multiple-function districts, authorities, commissions, boards, and other entities, which have varying degrees of autonomy, exist in the United States. The basic pattern of these entities varies widely from state to state. Moreover, various classes of local governments within a particular state also differ in their characteristics. Refer to the Individual State Descriptions report for an overview of all government entities authorized by state.The Public Use File provides a listing of all independent government units, and dependent school districts active as of fiscal year ending June 30, 2024. The Annual Surveys of Public Employment & Payroll (EP) and State and Local Government Finances (LF):The target population consists of all 50 state governments, the District of Columbia, and a sample of local governmental units (counties, cities, townships, special districts, school districts). In years ending in '2' and '7' the entire universe is canvassed. In intervening years, a sample of the target population is surveyed. Additional details on sampling are available in the survey methodology descriptions for those years.The Annual Survey of Public Pensions (PP):The target population consists of state- and locally-administered defined benefit funds and systems of all 50 state governments, the District of Columbia, and a sample of local governmental units (counties, cities, townships, special districts, school districts). In years ending in '2' and '7' the entire universe is canvassed. In intervening years, a sample of the target population is surveyed. Additional details on sampling are available in the survey methodology descriptions for those years.The Annual Surveys of State Government Finance (SG) and State Government Tax Collections (TC):The target population consists of all 50 state governments. No local governments are included. For the purpose of Census Bureau statistics, the term "state government" refers not only to the executive, legislative, and judicial branches of a given state, but it also includes agencies, institutions, commissions, and public authorities that operate separately or somewhat autonomously from the central state government but where the state government maintains administrative or fiscal control over their activities as defined by the Census Bureau. Additional details are available in the survey methodology description.The Annual Survey of School System Finances (SS):The Annual Survey of School System Finances targets all public school systems providing elementary and/or secondary education in all 50 states and the District of Columbia..Methodology.Data Items and Other Identifying Records.Total federal, state, and local government units by state.Unit(s) of Observation.The basic reporting unit is the governmental unit, defined as an organized entity which in addition to having governmental character, has sufficient discretion in the management of its own affairs to distinguish it as separate from the administrative structure of any other governmental unit.The reporting units for the Annual Survey of School System Finances are public school systems that provide elementary and/or secondary education. The term "public school systems" includes two types of government entities with responsibility for providing education services: (1) school districts that are administratively and fiscally independent of any other government and are counted as separate governments; and (2) public school systems that lack sufficient autonomy to be counted as separate governments and are classified as a dependent agency of some other government—a county, municipal, township, or state government. Charter school systems whose charters are held by nongovernmental entities are deemed to be out of...

Bolivia General Government: Expenditure: Current: Current Transfers: Public Fiscal Certificated Issue data was reported at 6,635.797 BOB mn in 2023. This records an increase from the previous number of 6,351.672 BOB mn for 2022. Bolivia General Government: Expenditure: Current: Current Transfers: Public Fiscal Certificated Issue data is updated yearly, averaging 444.974 BOB mn from Dec 1990 (Median) to 2023, with 34 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 6,635.797 BOB mn in 2023 and a record low of 0.000 BOB mn in 1990. Bolivia General Government: Expenditure: Current: Current Transfers: Public Fiscal Certificated Issue data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Ministry of Economics and Public Finance. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Bolivia – Table BO.F001: General Government Revenue and Expenditure.

Graph and download economic data for Government current expenditures: Federal: Education: Higher (G160701A027NBEA) from 1959 to 2023 about expenditures, education, federal, government, GDP, and USA.

Venezuela Central Government: Total Expenditure: Current: Transfers Expenditure: Public Transfers: To Nonfinancial Public Enterprises: OEFP data was reported at 247,155.641 VEF th in Sep 2010. This records an increase from the previous number of 135,065.656 VEF th for Aug 2010. Venezuela Central Government: Total Expenditure: Current: Transfers Expenditure: Public Transfers: To Nonfinancial Public Enterprises: OEFP data is updated monthly, averaging 58,306.038 VEF th from Jan 2002 (Median) to Sep 2010, with 105 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 608,767.505 VEF th in Sep 2005 and a record low of 684.323 VEF th in Apr 2002. Venezuela Central Government: Total Expenditure: Current: Transfers Expenditure: Public Transfers: To Nonfinancial Public Enterprises: OEFP data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Ministry of Economy, Finance and Public Banking. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Venezuela – Table VE.F001: Central Government: Revenue and Expenditure: Monthly.

United States - Government current expenditures: State and local: General public service: Other was 185.29800 Bil. of $ in January of 2023, according to the United States Federal Reserve. Historically, United States - Government current expenditures: State and local: General public service: Other reached a record high of 187.88300 in January of 2022 and a record low of 1.09500 in January of 1959. Trading Economics provides the current actual value, an historical data chart and related indicators for United States - Government current expenditures: State and local: General public service: Other - last updated from the United States Federal Reserve on July of 2025.

On May 23, 2012, the President issued a Presidential Memorandum on “Building a 21st Century Digital Government. It launched a comprehensive Digital Government Strategy (pdf/html5) aimed at delivering better digital services to the American people. The strategy builds on several initiatives, including Executive Order 13571, Streamlining Service Delivery and Improving Customer Service, and Executive Order 13576, Delivering an Efficient, Effective, and Accountable Government. The strategy lays out actions in a 12-month roadmap and has three main objectives: (1) Enable the American people and an increasingly mobile workforce to access high-quality digital government information and services anywhere, anytime, on any device. (2) Ensure that as the government adjusts to this new digital world, we seize the opportunity to procure and manage devices, applications, and data in smart, secure and affordable ways. (3) Unlock the power of government data to spur innovation across our Nation and improve the quality of services for the American people.