This dataset contains current and historical UV Index data for Reading.

We created an index to look at carbon security in the sagebrush steppe across the Great Basin. Our index uses a fractional plant cover dataset from the Rangeland Analysis Platform (https://rangelands.app/), a fire probability model dataset created for the Great Basin (Smith et al., 2023), and the resistance and resilience categorical dataset created for the sagebrush steppe (Chambers et al., 2014, 2017). Our carbon security index (CSI) is made up of three parts as following:CSI = Preferred Rangeland Cover Index + Resistance & Resilience – P(Fire)The result is an index that spans from -2 to +2 and can be used to compare carbon security in different spatial.For greater detail of methods and rational please read the associated paper.

This collection contains datasets with prebuilt Voyager indices for different organism group. These indices can be used with the Voyager taxonomic profiling tool for analysis of long-read sequencing data. Voyager is open-source software distributed under the LGPL and is available from https://bitbucket.org/sverre-phd-work/voyager/src/master/

This dataset contains all data and code necessary to reproduce the analysis presented in the manuscript: Winzeler, H.E., Owens, P.R., Read Q.D.., Libohova, Z., Ashworth, A., Sauer, T. 2022. 2022. Topographic wetness index as a proxy for soil moisture in a hillslope catena: flow algorithms and map generalization. Land 11:2018. DOI: 10.3390/land11112018. There are several steps to this analysis. The relevant scripts for each are listed below. The first step is to use the raw digital elevation data (DEM) to produce different versions of the topographic wetness index (TWI) for the study region (Calculating TWI). Then, these TWI output files are processed, along with soil moisture (volumetric water content or VWC) time series data from a number of sensors located within the study region, to create analysis-ready data objects (Processing TWI and VWC). Next, models are fit relating TWI to soil moisture (Model fitting) and results are plotted (Visualizing main results). A number of additional analyses were also done (Additional analyses). Input data The DEM of the study region is archived in this dataset as SourceDem.zip. This contains the DEM of the study region (DEM1.sgrd) and associated auxiliary files all called DEM1.* with different extensions. In addition, the DEM is provided as a .tif file called USGS_one_meter_x39y400_AR_R6_WashingtonCO_2015.tif. The remaining data and code files are archived in the repository created with a GitHub release on 2022-10-11, twi-moisture-0.1.zip. The data are found in a subfolder called data. 2017_LoggerData_HEW.csv through 2021_HEW.csv: Soil moisture (VWC) logger data for each year 2017-2021 (5 files total). 2882174.csv: weather data from a nearby station. DryPeriods2017-2021.csv: starting and ending days for dry periods 2017-2021. LoggerLocations.csv: Geographic locations and metadata for each VWC logger. Logger_Locations_TWI_2017-2021.xlsx: 546 topographic wetness indexes calculated at each VWC logger location. note: This is intermediate input created in the first step of the pipeline. Code pipeline To reproduce the analysis in the manuscript run these scripts in the following order. The scripts are all found in the root directory of the repository. See the manuscript for more details on the methods. Calculating TWI TerrainAnalysis.R: Taking the DEM file as input, calculates 546 different topgraphic wetness indexes using a variety of different algorithms. Each algorithm is run multiple times with different input parameters, as described in more detail in the manuscript. After performing this step, it is necessary to use the SAGA-GIS GUI to extract the TWI values for each of the sensor locations. The output generated in this way is included in this repository as Logger_Locations_TWI_2017-2021.xlsx. Therefore it is not necessary to rerun this step of the analysis but the code is provided for completeness. Processing TWI and VWC read_process_data.R: Takes raw TWI and moisture data files and processes them into analysis-ready format, saving the results as CSV. qc_avg_moisture.R: Does additional quality control on the moisture data and averages it across different time periods. Model fitting Models were fit regressing soil moisture (average VWC for a certain time period) against a TWI index, with and without soil depth as a covariate. In each case, for both the model without depth and the model with depth, prediction performance was calculated with and without spatially-blocked cross-validation. Where cross validation wasn't used, we simply used the predictions from the model fit to all the data. fit_combos.R: Models were fit to each combination of soil moisture averaged over 57 months (all months from April 2017-December 2021) and 546 TWI indexes. In addition models were fit to soil moisture averaged over years, and to the grand mean across the full study period. fit_dryperiods.R: Models were fit to soil moisture averaged over previously identified dry periods within the study period (each 1 or 2 weeks in length), again for each of the 546 indexes. fit_summer.R: Models were fit to the soil moisture average for the months of June-September for each of the five years, again for each of the 546 indexes. Visualizing main results Preliminary visualization of results was done in a series of RMarkdown notebooks. All the notebooks follow the same general format, plotting model performance (observed-predicted correlation) across different combinations of time period and characteristics of the TWI indexes being compared. The indexes are grouped by SWI versus TWI, DEM filter used, flow algorithm, and any other parameters that varied. The notebooks show the model performance metrics with and without the soil depth covariate, and with and without spatially-blocked cross-validation. Crossing those two factors, there are four values for model performance for each combination of time period and TWI index presented. performance_plots_bymonth.Rmd: Using the results from the models fit to each month of data separately, prediction performance was averaged by month across the five years of data to show within-year trends. performance_plots_byyear.Rmd: Using the results from the models fit to each month of data separately, prediction performance was averaged by year to show trends across multiple years. performance_plots_dry_periods.Rmd: Prediction performance was presented for the models fit to the previously identified dry periods. performance_plots_summer.Rmd: Prediction performance was presented for the models fit to the June-September moisture averages. Additional analyses Some additional analyses were done that may not be published in the final manuscript but which are included here for completeness. 2019dryperiod.Rmd: analysis, done separately for each day, of a specific dry period in 2019. alldryperiodsbyday.Rmd: analysis, done separately for each day, of the same dry periods discussed above. best_indices.R: after fitting models, this script was used to quickly identify some of the best-performing indexes for closer scrutiny. wateryearfigs.R: exploratory figures showing median and quantile interval of VWC for sensors in low and high TWI locations for each water year. Resources in this dataset:Resource Title: Digital elevation model of study region. File Name: SourceDEM.zipResource Description: .zip archive containing digital elevation model files for the study region. See dataset description for more details.Resource Title: twi-moisture-0.1: Archived git repository containing all other necessary data and code . File Name: twi-moisture-0.1.zipResource Description: .zip archive containing all data and code, other than the digital elevation model archived as a separate file. This file was generated by a GitHub release made on 2022-10-11 of the git repository hosted at https://github.com/qdread/twi-moisture (private repository). See dataset description and README file contained within this archive for more details.

Graph and download economic data for All-Transactions House Price Index for Berks County, PA (ATNHPIUS42011A) from 1975 to 2024 about Berks County, PA; Reading; PA; HPI; housing; price index; indexes; price; and USA.

Pathogen diversity resulting in quasispecies can enable persistence and adaptation to host defenses and therapies. However, accurate quasispecies characterization can be impeded by errors introduced during sample handling and sequencing which can require extensive optimizations to overcome. We present complete laboratory and bioinformatics workflows to overcome many of these hurdles. The Pacific Biosciences single molecule real-time platform was used to sequence PCR amplicons derived from cDNA templates tagged with universal molecular identifiers (SMRT-UMI). Optimized laboratory protocols were developed through extensive testing of different sample preparation conditions to minimize between-template recombination during PCR and the use of UMI allowed accurate template quantitation as well as removal of point mutations introduced during PCR and sequencing to produce a highly accurate consensus sequence from each template. Handling of the large datasets produced from SMRT-UMI sequencing was facilitated by a novel bioinformatic pipeline, Probabilistic Offspring Resolver for Primer IDs (PORPIDpipeline), that automatically filters and parses reads by sample, identifies and discards reads with UMIs likely created from PCR and sequencing errors, generates consensus sequences, checks for contamination within the dataset, and removes any sequence with evidence of PCR recombination or early cycle PCR errors, resulting in highly accurate sequence datasets. The optimized SMRT-UMI sequencing method presented here represents a highly adaptable and established starting point for accurate sequencing of diverse pathogens. These methods are illustrated through characterization of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) quasispecies. Methods This serves as an overview of the analysis performed on PacBio sequence data that is summarized in Analysis Flowchart.pdf and was used as primary data for the paper by Westfall et al. "Optimized SMRT-UMI protocol produces highly accurate sequence datasets from diverse populations – application to HIV-1 quasispecies" Five different PacBio sequencing datasets were used for this analysis: M027, M2199, M1567, M004, and M005 For the datasets which were indexed (M027, M2199), CCS reads from PacBio sequencing files and the chunked_demux_config files were used as input for the chunked_demux pipeline. Each config file lists the different Index primers added during PCR to each sample. The pipeline produces one fastq file for each Index primer combination in the config. For example, in dataset M027 there were 3–4 samples using each Index combination. The fastq files from each demultiplexed read set were moved to the sUMI_dUMI_comparison pipeline fastq folder for further demultiplexing by sample and consensus generation with that pipeline. More information about the chunked_demux pipeline can be found in the README.md file on GitHub. The demultiplexed read collections from the chunked_demux pipeline or CCS read files from datasets which were not indexed (M1567, M004, M005) were each used as input for the sUMI_dUMI_comparison pipeline along with each dataset's config file. Each config file contains the primer sequences for each sample (including the sample ID block in the cDNA primer) and further demultiplexes the reads to prepare data tables summarizing all of the UMI sequences and counts for each family (tagged.tar.gz) as well as consensus sequences from each sUMI and rank 1 dUMI family (consensus.tar.gz). More information about the sUMI_dUMI_comparison pipeline can be found in the paper and the README.md file on GitHub. The consensus.tar.gz and tagged.tar.gz files were moved from sUMI_dUMI_comparison pipeline directory on the server to the Pipeline_Outputs folder in this analysis directory for each dataset and appended with the dataset name (e.g. consensus_M027.tar.gz). Also in this analysis directory is a Sample_Info_Table.csv containing information about how each of the samples was prepared, such as purification methods and number of PCRs. There are also three other folders: Sequence_Analysis, Indentifying_Recombinant_Reads, and Figures. Each has an .Rmd file with the same name inside which is used to collect, summarize, and analyze the data. All of these collections of code were written and executed in RStudio to track notes and summarize results. Sequence_Analysis.Rmd has instructions to decompress all of the consensus.tar.gz files, combine them, and create two fasta files, one with all sUMI and one with all dUMI sequences. Using these as input, two data tables were created, that summarize all sequences and read counts for each sample that pass various criteria. These are used to help create Table 2 and as input for Indentifying_Recombinant_Reads.Rmd and Figures.Rmd. Next, 2 fasta files containing all of the rank 1 dUMI sequences and the matching sUMI sequences were created. These were used as input for the python script compare_seqs.py which identifies any matched sequences that are different between sUMI and dUMI read collections. This information was also used to help create Table 2. Finally, to populate the table with the number of sequences and bases in each sequence subset of interest, different sequence collections were saved and viewed in the Geneious program. To investigate the cause of sequences where the sUMI and dUMI sequences do not match, tagged.tar.gz was decompressed and for each family with discordant sUMI and dUMI sequences the reads from the UMI1_keeping directory were aligned using geneious. Reads from dUMI families failing the 0.7 filter were also aligned in Genious. The uncompressed tagged folder was then removed to save space. These read collections contain all of the reads in a UMI1 family and still include the UMI2 sequence. By examining the alignment and specifically the UMI2 sequences, the site of the discordance and its case were identified for each family as described in the paper. These alignments were saved as "Sequence Alignments.geneious". The counts of how many families were the result of PCR recombination were used in the body of the paper. Using Identifying_Recombinant_Reads.Rmd, the dUMI_ranked.csv file from each sample was extracted from all of the tagged.tar.gz files, combined and used as input to create a single dataset containing all UMI information from all samples. This file dUMI_df.csv was used as input for Figures.Rmd. Figures.Rmd used dUMI_df.csv, sequence_counts.csv, and read_counts.csv as input to create draft figures and then individual datasets for eachFigure. These were copied into Prism software to create the final figures for the paper.

France's main stock market index, the FR40, fell to 7546 points on August 1, 2025, losing 2.91% from the previous session. Over the past month, the index has declined 2.48%, though it remains 4.06% higher than a year ago, according to trading on a contract for difference (CFD) that tracks this benchmark index from France. France Stock Market Index (FR40) - values, historical data, forecasts and news - updated on August of 2025.

Baltic Dry rose to 2,018 Index Points on August 1, 2025, up 0.75% from the previous day. Over the past month, Baltic Dry's price has risen 39.85%, and is up 20.48% compared to the same time last year, according to trading on a contract for difference (CFD) that tracks the benchmark market for this commodity. Baltic Exchange Dry Index - values, historical data, forecasts and news - updated on August of 2025.

For the first time, the full results from the Global Green Economy Index (GGEI) are available in the public domain. Historically, only the aggregate results have been publicly accessible. The full dataset has been paywalled and accessible to our subscribers only. But the way in which we release GGEI data to the public is changing. Read on for a quick explanation for how and why.

First, the how. The GGEI file publicly accessible today represents that dataset officially compiled in 2022. It contains the full results for each of the 18 indicators in the GGEI for 160 countries, across the four main dimensions of climate change & social equity, sector decarbonization, markets & ESG investment and the environment. Some (not all) of these data points have since been updated, as new datasets have been published. The GGEI is a dynamic model, updating in real-time as new data becomes available. Our subscribing clients will still receive this most timely version of the model, along with any customizations they may request.

Now, the why. First and foremost, there is huge demand among academic researchers globally for the full GGEI dataset. Academic inquiry around the green transition, sustainable development, ESG investing, and green energy systems has exploded over the past several years. We receive hundreds of inquiries annually from these students and researchers to access the full GGEI dataset. Making it publicly accessible as we are today makes it easier for these individuals and institutions to use these GGEI to promote learning and green progress within their institutions.

More broadly, the landscape for data has changed significantly. A decade ago when the GGEI was first published, datasets existed more in silos and users might subscribe to one specific dataset like the GGEI to answer a specific question. But today, data usage in the sustainability space has become much more of a system, whereby myriad data sources are synthesized into increasingly sophisticated models, often fueled by artificial intelligence. Making the GGEI more accessible will accelerate how this perspective on the global green economy can be integrated to these systems.

This collection contains datasets with prebuilt Voyager indices for different organism group. These indices can be used with the Voyager taxonomic profiling tool for analysis of long-read sequencing data. Voyager is open-source software distributed under the LGPL and is available from https://bitbucket.org/sverre-phd-work/voyager/src/master/

Croatia: PISA reading scores: The latest value from 2022 is 475.499 index points, a decline from 478.989 index points in 2018. In comparison, the world average is 437.426 index points, based on data from 78 countries. Historically, the average for Croatia from 2006 to 2022 is 479.838 index points. The minimum value, 475.499 index points, was reached in 2022 while the maximum of 486.863 index points was recorded in 2015.

Consumer Price Index CPI in the United States increased to 322.56 points in June from 321.46 points in May of 2025. This dataset provides the latest reported value for - United States Consumer Price Index (CPI) - plus previous releases, historical high and low, short-term forecast and long-term prediction, economic calendar, survey consensus and news.

CPI: IPC-MG-DI: Belo Horizonte: Education, Reading & Recreation data was reported at 315.988 Dec2019=100 in Jan 2021. This records a decrease from the previous number of 317.972 Dec2019=100 for Dec 2020. CPI: IPC-MG-DI: Belo Horizonte: Education, Reading & Recreation data is updated monthly, averaging 173.542 Dec2019=100 from Jan 2001 (Median) to Jan 2021, with 241 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 318.920 Dec2019=100 in Nov 2020 and a record low of 102.029 Dec2019=100 in Jan 2001. CPI: IPC-MG-DI: Belo Horizonte: Education, Reading & Recreation data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Getulio Vargas Foundation. The data is categorized under Brazil Premium Database’s Inflation – Table BR.FGV: Consumer Price Index: by Metropolitan Region.

Redbook Index in the United States increased by 4.90 percent in the week ending July 26 of 2025 over the same week in the previous year. This dataset provides the latest reported value for - United States Redbook Index - plus previous releases, historical high and low, short-term forecast and long-term prediction, economic calendar, survey consensus and news.

China's main stock market index, the SHANGHAI, fell to 3560 points on August 1, 2025, losing 0.37% from the previous session. Over the past month, the index has climbed 3.04% and is up 22.53% compared to the same time last year, according to trading on a contract for difference (CFD) that tracks this benchmark index from China. China Shanghai Composite Stock Market Index - values, historical data, forecasts and news - updated on August of 2025.

Thailand Consumer Price Index (CPI): RE: Recreation & Reading data was reported at 101.010 2011=100 in Dec 2016. This records an increase from the previous number of 100.950 2011=100 for Nov 2016. Thailand Consumer Price Index (CPI): RE: Recreation & Reading data is updated monthly, averaging 99.600 2011=100 from Dec 2001 (Median) to Dec 2016, with 181 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 101.010 2011=100 in Dec 2016 and a record low of 95.030 2011=100 in Aug 2002. Thailand Consumer Price Index (CPI): RE: Recreation & Reading data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Bureau of Trade and Economic Indices. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Thailand – Table TH.I009: Consumer Price Index: 2011=100.

The Air Quality Health Index (AQHI) is a scale designed to help quantify the quality of the air in a certain region on a scale from 1 to 10. When the amount of air pollution is very high, the number is reported as 10+. It also includes a category that describes the health risk associated with the index reading (e.g. Low, Moderate, High, or Very High Health Risk). The AQHI is calculated based on the relative risks of a combination of common air pollutants that are known to harm human health, including ground-level ozone, particulate matter, and nitrogen dioxide. The AQHI formulation captures only the short term or acute health risk (exposure of hour or days at a maximum). The formulation of the AQHI may change over time to reflect new understanding associated with air pollution health effects. The AQHI is calculated from data observed in real time, without being verified (quality control).