The goal of this research is to examine direct answers in Google web search engine. Dataset was collected using Senuto (https://www.senuto.com/). Senuto is as an online tool, that extracts data on websites visibility from Google search engine.

Dataset contains the following elements:

keyword,

number of monthly searches,

featured domain,

featured main domain,

featured position,

featured type,

featured url,

content,

content length.

Dataset with visibility structure has 743 798 keywords that were resulting in SERPs with direct answer.

Ranked by Keyword the Web Search Data consists of:

• 25+ consumer categories
• Insights from Top Brands, Top Products, Click Share, Conversion Share, Product Competitors per Search Term and Technical Product Specifications
• 2+ years of historical coverage
• 13+ markets

Minute-by-minute updated keyword database from Google, featuring 250 trending search terms

Belarus Internet Usage: Search Engine Market Share: Desktop: StartPagina (Google) data was reported at 0.000 % in 09 Mar 2025. This records a decrease from the previous number of 0.030 % for 08 Mar 2025. Belarus Internet Usage: Search Engine Market Share: Desktop: StartPagina (Google) data is updated daily, averaging 0.070 % from Mar 2025 (Median) to 09 Mar 2025, with 9 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 0.070 % in 05 Mar 2025 and a record low of 0.000 % in 09 Mar 2025. Belarus Internet Usage: Search Engine Market Share: Desktop: StartPagina (Google) data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Statcounter Global Stats. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Belarus – Table BY.SC.IU: Internet Usage: Search Engine Market Share.

Job Offers Web Scraping Search

Targeted Results to Find the Optimal Work Solution

By [source]

About this dataset

This dataset collects job offers from web scraping which are filtered according to specific keywords, locations and times. This data gives users rich and precise search capabilities to uncover the best working solution for them. With the information collected, users can explore options that match with their personal situation, skillset and preferences in terms of location and schedule. The columns provide detailed information around job titles, employer names, locations, time frames as well as other necessary parameters so you can make a smart choice for your next career opportunity

More Datasets

For more datasets, click here.

Featured Notebooks

• 🚨 Your notebook can be here! 🚨!

How to use the dataset

This dataset is a great resource for those looking to find an optimal work solution based on keywords, location and time parameters. With this information, users can quickly and easily search through job offers that best fit their needs. Here are some tips on how to use this dataset to its fullest potential:

• Start by identifying what type of job offer you want to find. The keyword column will help you narrow down your search by allowing you to search for job postings that contain the word or phrase you are looking for.

• Next, consider where the job is located – the Location column tells you where in the world each posting is from so make sure it’s somewhere that suits your needs!

• Finally, consider when the position is available – look at the Time frame column which gives an indication of when each posting was made as well as if it’s a full-time/ part-time role or even if it’s a casual/temporary position from day one so make sure it meets your requirements first before applying!

• Additionally, if details such as hours per week or further schedule information are important criteria then there is also info provided under Horari and Temps Oferta columns too! Now that all three criteria have been ticked off - key words, location and time frame - then take a look at Empresa (Company Name) and Nom_Oferta (Post Name) columns too in order to get an idea of who will be employing you should you land the gig!

  All these pieces of data put together should give any motivated individual all they need in order to seek out an optimal work solution - keep hunting good luck!

Research Ideas

• Machine learning can be used to groups job offers in order to facilitate the identification of similarities and differences between them. This could allow users to specifically target their search for a work solution.
• The data can be used to compare job offerings across different areas or types of jobs, enabling users to make better informed decisions in terms of their career options and goals.
• It may also provide an insight into the local job market, enabling companies and employers to identify where there is potential for new opportunities or possible trends that simply may have previously gone unnoticed

Acknowledgements

If you use this dataset in your research, please credit the original authors. Data Source

License

License: CC0 1.0 Universal (CC0 1.0) - Public Domain Dedication No Copyright - You can copy, modify, distribute and perform the work, even for commercial purposes, all without asking permission. See Other Information.

Columns

File: web_scraping_information_offers.csv | Column name | Description | |:-----------------|:------------------------------------| | Nom_Oferta | Name of the job offer. (String) | | Empresa | Company offering the job. (String) | | Ubicació | Location of the job offer. (String) | | Temps_Oferta | Time of the job offer. (String) | | Horari | Schedule of the job offer. (String) |

Acknowledgements

If you use this dataset in your research, please credit the original authors. If you use this dataset in your research, please credit .

Explore real-time online search and web trends with Success.ai’s comprehensive data on search engines and B2B intent. Uncover actionable insights for competitive intelligence and targeted marketing. Guaranteed best price and quality.

We designed a human study to collect fixation data during visual search. We opted for a task that involved searching for a single image (the target) within a synthesised collage of images (the search set). Each of the collages are the random permutation of a finite set of images. To explore the impact of the similarity in appearance between target and search set on both fixation behaviour and automatic inference, we have created three different search tasks covering a range of similarities. In prior work, colour was found to be a particularly important cue for guiding search to targets and target-similar objects. Therefore we have selected for the first task 78 coloured O'Reilly book covers to compose the collages. These covers show a woodcut of an animal at the top and the title of the book in a characteristic font underneath. Given that overall cover appearance was very similar, this task allows us to analyse fixation behaviour when colour is the most discriminative feature. For the second task we use a set of 84 book covers from Amazon. In contrast to the first task, appearance of these covers is more diverse. This makes it possible to analyse fixation behaviour when both structure and colour information could be used by participants to find the target. Finally, for the third task, we use a set of 78 mugshots from a public database of suspects. In contrast to the other tasks, we transformed the mugshots to grey-scale so that they did not contain any colour information. In this case, allows abalysis of fixation behaviour when colour information was not available at all. We found faces to be particularly interesting given the relevance of searching for faces in many practical applications. 18 participants (9 males), age 18-30 Gaze data recorded with a stationary Tobii TX300 eye tracker More information about the dataset can be found in the README file.

The King County Groundwater Protection Program maintains a database of groundwater wells, water quality and water level sampling data. Users may search the database using Quick or Advanced Search OR use King County Groundwater iMap map set. The viewer provides a searchable map interface for locating groundwater well data.

Yemen Google Search Trends: Online Movie: Pornhub data was reported at 9.000 Score in 28 Nov 2025. This records an increase from the previous number of 8.000 Score for 27 Nov 2025. Yemen Google Search Trends: Online Movie: Pornhub data is updated daily, averaging 0.000 Score from Dec 2021 (Median) to 28 Nov 2025, with 1459 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 57.000 Score in 09 Feb 2022 and a record low of 0.000 Score in 16 Nov 2025. Yemen Google Search Trends: Online Movie: Pornhub data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Google Trends. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Yemen – Table YE.Google.GT: Google Search Trends: by Categories.

The Repository Analytics and Metrics Portal (RAMP) is a web service that aggregates use and performance use data of institutional repositories. The data are a subset of data from RAMP, the Repository Analytics and Metrics Portal (http://rampanalytics.org), consisting of data from all participating repositories for the calendar year 2018. For a description of the data collection, processing, and output methods, please see the "methods" section below. Note that the RAMP data model changed in August, 2018 and two sets of documentation are provided to describe data collection and processing before and after the change.

Methods

RAMP Data Documentation – January 1, 2017 through August 18, 2018

Data Collection

RAMP data were downloaded for participating IR from Google Search Console (GSC) via the Search Console API. The data consist of aggregated information about IR pages which appeared in search result pages (SERP) within Google properties (including web search and Google Scholar).

Data from January 1, 2017 through August 18, 2018 were downloaded in one dataset per participating IR. The following fields were downloaded for each URL, with one row per URL:

url: This is returned as a 'page' by the GSC API, and is the URL of the page which was included in an SERP for a Google property.
impressions: The number of times the URL appears within the SERP.
clicks: The number of clicks on a URL which took users to a page outside of the SERP.
clickThrough: Calculated as the number of clicks divided by the number of impressions.
position: The position of the URL within the SERP.
country: The country from which the corresponding search originated.
device: The device used for the search.
date: The date of the search.

Following data processing describe below, on ingest into RAMP an additional field, citableContent, is added to the page level data.

Note that no personally identifiable information is downloaded by RAMP. Google does not make such information available.

More information about click-through rates, impressions, and position is available from Google's Search Console API documentation: https://developers.google.com/webmaster-tools/search-console-api-original/v3/searchanalytics/query and https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/7042828?hl=en

Data Processing

Upon download from GSC, data are processed to identify URLs that point to citable content. Citable content is defined within RAMP as any URL which points to any type of non-HTML content file (PDF, CSV, etc.). As part of the daily download of statistics from Google Search Console (GSC), URLs are analyzed to determine whether they point to HTML pages or actual content files. URLs that point to content files are flagged as "citable content." In addition to the fields downloaded from GSC described above, following this brief analysis one more field, citableContent, is added to the data which records whether each URL in the GSC data points to citable content. Possible values for the citableContent field are "Yes" and "No."

Processed data are then saved in a series of Elasticsearch indices. From January 1, 2017, through August 18, 2018, RAMP stored data in one index per participating IR.

About Citable Content Downloads

Data visualizations and aggregations in RAMP dashboards present information about citable content downloads, or CCD. As a measure of use of institutional repository content, CCD represent click activity on IR content that may correspond to research use.

CCD information is summary data calculated on the fly within the RAMP web application. As noted above, data provided by GSC include whether and how many times a URL was clicked by users. Within RAMP, a "click" is counted as a potential download, so a CCD is calculated as the sum of clicks on pages/URLs that are determined to point to citable content (as defined above).

For any specified date range, the steps to calculate CCD are:

Filter data to only include rows where "citableContent" is set to "Yes."
Sum the value of the "clicks" field on these rows.

Output to CSV

Published RAMP data are exported from the production Elasticsearch instance and converted to CSV format. The CSV data consist of one "row" for each page or URL from a specific IR which appeared in search result pages (SERP) within Google properties as described above.

The data in these CSV files include the following fields:

url: This is returned as a 'page' by the GSC API, and is the URL of the page which was included in an SERP for a Google property.
impressions: The number of times the URL appears within the SERP.
clicks: The number of clicks on a URL which took users to a page outside of the SERP.
clickThrough: Calculated as the number of clicks divided by the number of impressions.
position: The position of the URL within the SERP.
country: The country from which the corresponding search originated.
device: The device used for the search.
date: The date of the search.
citableContent: Whether or not the URL points to a content file (ending with pdf, csv, etc.) rather than HTML wrapper pages. Possible values are Yes or No.
index: The Elasticsearch index corresponding to page click data for a single IR.
repository_id: This is a human readable alias for the index and identifies the participating repository corresponding to each row. As RAMP has undergone platform and version migrations over time, index names as defined for the index field have not remained consistent. That is, a single participating repository may have multiple corresponding Elasticsearch index names over time. The repository_id is a canonical identifier that has been added to the data to provide an identifier that can be used to reference a single participating repository across all datasets. Filtering and aggregation for individual repositories or groups of repositories should be done using this field.

Filenames for files containing these data follow the format 2018-01_RAMP_all.csv. Using this example, the file 2018-01_RAMP_all.csv contains all data for all RAMP participating IR for the month of January, 2018.

Data Collection from August 19, 2018 Onward

RAMP data are downloaded for participating IR from Google Search Console (GSC) via the Search Console API. The data consist of aggregated information about IR pages which appeared in search result pages (SERP) within Google properties (including web search and Google Scholar).

Data are downloaded in two sets per participating IR. The first set includes page level statistics about URLs pointing to IR pages and content files. The following fields are downloaded for each URL, with one row per URL:

url: This is returned as a 'page' by the GSC API, and is the URL of the page which was included in an SERP for a Google property.
impressions: The number of times the URL appears within the SERP.
clicks: The number of clicks on a URL which took users to a page outside of the SERP.
clickThrough: Calculated as the number of clicks divided by the number of impressions.
position: The position of the URL within the SERP.
date: The date of the search.

Following data processing describe below, on ingest into RAMP a additional field, citableContent, is added to the page level data.

The second set includes similar information, but instead of being aggregated at the page level, the data are grouped based on the country from which the user submitted the corresponding search, and the type of device used. The following fields are downloaded for combination of country and device, with one row per country/device combination:

country: The country from which the corresponding search originated.
device: The device used for the search.
impressions: The number of times the URL appears within the SERP.
clicks: The number of clicks on a URL which took users to a page outside of the SERP.
clickThrough: Calculated as the number of clicks divided by the number of impressions.
position: The position of the URL within the SERP.
date: The date of the search.

Note that no personally identifiable information is downloaded by RAMP. Google does not make such information available.

More information about click-through rates, impressions, and position is available from Google's Search Console API documentation: https://developers.google.com/webmaster-tools/search-console-api-original/v3/searchanalytics/query and https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/7042828?hl=en

Data Processing

Upon download from GSC, the page level data described above are processed to identify URLs that point to citable content. Citable content is defined within RAMP as any URL which points to any type of non-HTML content file (PDF, CSV, etc.). As part of the daily download of page level statistics from Google Search Console (GSC), URLs are analyzed to determine whether they point to HTML pages or actual content files. URLs that point to content files are flagged as "citable content." In addition to the fields downloaded from GSC described above, following this brief analysis one more field, citableContent, is added to the page level data which records whether each page/URL in the GSC data points to citable content. Possible values for the citableContent field are "Yes" and "No."

The data aggregated by the search country of origin and device type do not include URLs. No additional processing is done on these data. Harvested data are passed directly into Elasticsearch.

Processed data are then saved in a series of Elasticsearch indices. Currently, RAMP stores data in two indices per participating IR. One index includes the page level data, the second index includes the country of origin and device type data.

About Citable Content Downloads

Data visualizations and aggregations in RAMP dashboards present information about citable content downloads, or CCD. As a measure of use of institutional repository

Previous studies on supporting free-form keyword queries over RDBMSs provide users with linked-structures (e.g.,a set of joined tuples) that are relevant to a given keyword query. Most of them focus on ranking individual tuples from one table or joins of multiple tables containing a set of keywords. In this paper, we study the problem of keyword search in a data cube with text-rich dimension(s) (so-called text cube). The text cube is built on a multidimensional text database, where each row is associated with some text data (a document) and other structural dimensions (attributes). A cell in the text cube aggregates a set of documents with matching attribute values in a subset of dimensions. We define a keyword-based query language and an IR-style relevance model for coring/ranking cells in the text cube. Given a keyword query, our goal is to find the top-k most relevant cells. We propose four approaches, inverted-index one-scan, document sorted-scan, bottom-up dynamic programming, and search-space ordering. The search-space ordering algorithm explores only a small portion of the text cube for finding the top-k answers, and enables early termination. Extensive experimental studies are conducted to verify the effectiveness and efficiency of the proposed approaches. Citation: B. Ding, B. Zhao, C. X. Lin, J. Han, C. Zhai, A. N. Srivastava, and N. C. Oza, “Efficient Keyword-Based Search for Top-K Cells in Text Cube,” IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2011.

The global Vector Database Software market is poised for substantial growth, projected to reach an estimated $XXX million in 2025, with an impressive Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of XX% during the forecast period of 2025-2033. This rapid expansion is fueled by the increasing adoption of AI and machine learning across industries, necessitating efficient storage and retrieval of unstructured data like images, audio, and text. The burgeoning demand for enhanced search capabilities, personalized recommendations, and advanced anomaly detection is driving the market forward. Key market drivers include the widespread implementation of large language models (LLMs), the growing need for semantic search functionalities, and the continuous innovation in AI-powered applications. The market is segmenting into applications catering to both Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs) and Large Enterprises, with a clear shift towards Cloud-based solutions owing to their scalability, cost-effectiveness, and ease of deployment. The vector database landscape is characterized by dynamic innovation and fierce competition, with prominent players like Pinecone, Weaviate, Supabase, and Zilliz Cloud leading the charge. Emerging trends such as the development of hybrid search capabilities, integration with existing data infrastructure, and enhanced security features are shaping the market's trajectory. While the market shows immense promise, certain restraints, including the complexity of data integration and the need for specialized technical expertise, may pose challenges. Geographically, North America is expected to dominate the market share due to its early adoption of AI technologies and robust R&D investments, followed closely by Asia Pacific, which is witnessing rapid digital transformation and a surge in AI startups. Europe and other emerging regions are also anticipated to contribute significantly to market growth as AI adoption becomes more widespread. This report delves into the rapidly evolving Vector Database Software Market, providing a detailed analysis of its landscape from 2019 to 2033. With a Base Year of 2025, the report offers crucial insights for the Estimated Year of 2025 and projects market dynamics through the Forecast Period of 2025-2033, building upon the Historical Period of 2019-2024. The global vector database software market is poised for significant expansion, with an estimated market size projected to reach hundreds of millions of dollars by 2025, and anticipated to grow exponentially in the coming years. This growth is fueled by the increasing adoption of AI and machine learning across various industries, necessitating efficient storage and retrieval of high-dimensional vector data.

Comprehensive dataset containing 4 verified Executive search firm businesses in Montana, United States with complete contact information, ratings, reviews, and location data.

Data from the Interactive Social Book Search Track Series 2014-2016

This is version 3.1.1.2020f of Met Office Hadley Centre's Integrated Surface Database, HadISD. These data are global sub-daily surface meteorological data that extends HadISD v3.1.0.2019f to include 2020 and so spans 1931-2020. The quality controlled variables in this dataset are: temperature, dewpoint temperature, sea-level pressure, wind speed and direction, cloud data (total, low, mid and high level). Past significant weather and precipitation data are also included, but have not been quality controlled, so their quality and completeness cannot be guaranteed. Quality control flags and data values which have been removed during the quality control process are provided in the qc_flags and flagged_values fields, and ancillary data files show the station listing with a station listing with IDs, names and location information. The data are provided as one NetCDF file per station. Files in the station_data folder station data files have the format "station_code"_HadISD_HadOBS_19310101-20210101_v3-1-1-2020f.nc. The station codes can be found under the docs tab. The station codes file has five columns as follows: 1) station code, 2) station name 3) station latitude 4) station longitude 5) station height. To keep informed about updates, news and announcements follow the HadOBS team on twitter @metofficeHadOBS. For more detailed information e.g bug fixes, routine updates and other exploratory analysis, see the HadISD blog: http://hadisd.blogspot.co.uk/ References: When using the dataset in a paper you must cite the following papers (see Docs for link to the publications) and this dataset (using the "citable as" reference) : Dunn, R. J. H., (2019), HadISD version 3: monthly updates, Hadley Centre Technical Note. Dunn, R. J. H., Willett, K. M., Parker, D. E., and Mitchell, L.: Expanding HadISD: quality-controlled, sub-daily station data from 1931, Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 5, 473-491, doi:10.5194/gi-5-473-2016, 2016. Dunn, R. J. H., et al. (2012), HadISD: A Quality Controlled global synoptic report database for selected variables at long-term stations from 1973-2011, Clim. Past, 8, 1649-1679, 2012, doi:10.5194/cp-8-1649-2012 Smith, A., N. Lott, and R. Vose, 2011: The Integrated Surface Database: Recent Developments and Partnerships. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 92, 704–708, doi:10.1175/2011BAMS3015.1 For a homogeneity assessment of HadISD please see this following reference Dunn, R. J. H., K. M. Willett, C. P. Morice, and D. E. Parker. "Pairwise homogeneity assessment of HadISD." Climate of the Past 10, no. 4 (2014): 1501-1522. doi:10.5194/cp-10-1501-2014, 2014.

URL: https://lookerstudio.google.com/reporting/b09cf7e4-cd33-46db-9efc-0f16ffe5094b Accuracy: There are no known issues with the data.

Update Frequency: Daily

Contact: OPL Finance & Business Services

This dataset is taken from Google Trend. It shows the trend of "Data Science" search term on Google Search Engine and YouTube from 2004 to 2022 (April). There will be an update soon.

Data related to the Master Thesis on The Impact of Biased Search Results on User Engagement in Web Search. The dataset consists of search results, search result annotations, interaction logs of the final study and the survey responses for the pilot and final study.

The Doing Business Search provides access to information on entities and individuals that do business with the City of New York. http://www.nyc.gov/portal/site/DBusinessSite

AI Dataset Search Platform Market Outlook

According to our latest research, the global AI Dataset Search Platform market size is valued at USD 1.18 billion in 2024, with a robust year-over-year expansion driven by the escalating demand for high-quality datasets to fuel artificial intelligence and machine learning initiatives across industries. The market is expected to grow at a CAGR of 22.6% from 2025 to 2033, reaching an estimated USD 9.62 billion by 2033. This exponential growth is primarily attributed to the increasing recognition of data as a strategic asset, the proliferation of AI applications across sectors, and the need for efficient, scalable, and secure platforms to discover, curate, and manage diverse datasets.

One of the primary growth factors propelling the AI Dataset Search Platform market is the exponential surge in AI adoption across both public and private sectors. Businesses and institutions are increasingly leveraging AI to gain competitive advantages, enhance operational efficiencies, and deliver personalized experiences. However, the effectiveness of AI models is fundamentally reliant on the quality and diversity of training datasets. As organizations strive to accelerate their AI initiatives, the need for platforms that can efficiently search, aggregate, and validate datasets from disparate sources has become paramount. This has led to a significant uptick in investments in AI dataset search platforms, as they enable faster data discovery, reduce development cycles, and ensure compliance with data governance standards.

Another key driver for the market is the growing complexity and volume of data generated from emerging technologies such as IoT, edge computing, and connected devices. The sheer scale and heterogeneity of data sources necessitate advanced search platforms equipped with intelligent indexing, semantic search, and metadata management capabilities. These platforms not only facilitate the identification of relevant datasets but also support data annotation, labeling, and preprocessing, which are critical for building robust AI models. Furthermore, the integration of AI-powered search algorithms within these platforms enhances the accuracy and relevance of search results, thereby improving the overall efficiency of data scientists and AI practitioners.

Additionally, regulatory pressures and the increasing emphasis on ethical AI have underscored the importance of transparent and auditable data sourcing. Organizations are compelled to demonstrate the provenance and integrity of the datasets used in their AI models to mitigate risks related to bias, privacy, and compliance. AI dataset search platforms address these challenges by providing traceability, version control, and access management features, ensuring that only authorized and compliant datasets are utilized. This not only reduces legal and reputational risks but also fosters trust among stakeholders, further accelerating market adoption.

From a regional perspective, North America dominates the AI Dataset Search Platform market in 2024, accounting for over 38% of the global revenue. This leadership is driven by the presence of major technology providers, a mature AI ecosystem, and substantial investments in research and development. Europe follows closely, benefiting from stringent data privacy regulations and strong government support for AI innovation. The Asia Pacific region is experiencing the fastest growth, propelled by rapid digital transformation, expanding AI research communities, and increasing government initiatives to foster AI adoption. Latin America and the Middle East & Africa are also witnessing steady growth, albeit from a smaller base, as organizations in these regions gradually embrace AI-driven solutions.

Component Analysis

The AI Dataset Search Platform market by component is segmented into platforms and services, each playing a pivotal role in the ecosystem. The platform segment encompasses the core software infrastructure that enables users to search, index, curate, and manage datasets. This segmen