Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Advances in neuroimaging, genomic, motion tracking, eye-tracking and many other technology-based data collection methods have led to a torrent of high dimensional datasets, which commonly have a small number of samples because of the intrinsic high cost of data collection involving human participants. High dimensional data with a small number of samples is of critical importance for identifying biomarkers and conducting feasibility and pilot work, however it can lead to biased machine learning (ML) performance estimates. Our review of studies which have applied ML to predict autistic from non-autistic individuals showed that small sample size is associated with higher reported classification accuracy. Thus, we have investigated whether this bias could be caused by the use of validation methods which do not sufficiently control overfitting. Our simulations show that K-fold Cross-Validation (CV) produces strongly biased performance estimates with small sample sizes, and the bias is still evident with sample size of 1000. Nested CV and train/test split approaches produce robust and unbiased performance estimates regardless of sample size. We also show that feature selection if performed on pooled training and testing data is contributing to bias considerably more than parameter tuning. In addition, the contribution to bias by data dimensionality, hyper-parameter space and number of CV folds was explored, and validation methods were compared with discriminable data. The results suggest how to design robust testing methodologies when working with small datasets and how to interpret the results of other studies based on what validation method was used.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution-ShareAlike 3.0 (CC BY-SA 3.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
License information was derived automatically
Imports:
# All Imports
import os
from matplotlib import pyplot as plt
import pandas as pd
from sklearn.calibration import LabelEncoder
import seaborn as sns
import matplotlib.image as mpimg
import cv2
import numpy as np
import pickle
# Tensflor and Keras Layer and Model and Optimize and Loss
import tensorflow as tf
from tensorflow import keras
from keras import Sequential
from keras.layers import *
#Kernel Intilizer
from keras.optimizers import Adamax
# PreTrained Model
from keras.applications import *
#Early Stopping
from keras.callbacks import EarlyStopping
import warnings
Warnings Suppression | Configuration
# Warnings Remove
warnings.filterwarnings("ignore")
# Define the base path for the training folder
base_path = 'jaguar_cheetah/train'
# Weights file
weights_file = 'Model_train_weights.weights.h5'
# Path to the saved or to save the model:
model_file = 'Model-cheetah_jaguar_Treined.keras'
# Model history
history_path = 'training_history_cheetah_jaguar.pkl'
# Initialize lists to store file paths and labels
filepaths = []
labels = []
# Iterate over folders and files within the training directory
for folder in ['Cheetah', 'Jaguar']:
folder_path = os.path.join(base_path, folder)
for filename in os.listdir(folder_path):
file_path = os.path.join(folder_path, filename)
filepaths.append(file_path)
labels.append(folder)
# Create the TRAINING dataframe
file_path_series = pd.Series(filepaths , name= 'filepath')
Label_path_series = pd.Series(labels , name = 'label')
df_train = pd.concat([file_path_series ,Label_path_series ] , axis = 1)
# Define the base path for the test folder
directory = "jaguar_cheetah/test"
filepath =[]
label = []
folds = os.listdir(directory)
for fold in folds:
f_path = os.path.join(directory , fold)
imgs = os.listdir(f_path)
for img in imgs:
img_path = os.path.join(f_path , img)
filepath.append(img_path)
label.append(fold)
# Create the TEST dataframe
file_path_series = pd.Series(filepath , name= 'filepath')
Label_path_series = pd.Series(label , name = 'label')
df_test = pd.concat([file_path_series ,Label_path_series ] , axis = 1)
# Display the first rows of the dataframe for verification
#print(df_train)
# Folders with Training and Test files
data_dir = 'jaguar_cheetah/train'
test_dir = 'jaguar_cheetah/test'
# Image size 256x256
IMAGE_SIZE = (256,256)
Tain | Test
#print('Training Images:')
# Create the TRAIN dataframe
train_ds = tf.keras.utils.image_dataset_from_directory(
data_dir,
validation_split=0.1,
subset='training',
seed=123,
image_size=IMAGE_SIZE,
batch_size=32)
#Testing Data
#print('Validation Images:')
validation_ds = tf.keras.utils.image_dataset_from_directory(
data_dir,
validation_split=0.1,
subset='validation',
seed=123,
image_size=IMAGE_SIZE,
batch_size=32)
print('Testing Images:')
test_ds = tf.keras.utils.image_dataset_from_directory(
test_dir,
seed=123,
image_size=IMAGE_SIZE,
batch_size=32)
# Extract labels
train_labels = train_ds.class_names
test_labels = test_ds.class_names
validation_labels = validation_ds.class_names
# Encode labels
# Defining the class labels
class_labels = ['CHEETAH', 'JAGUAR']
# Instantiate (encoder) LabelEncoder
label_encoder = LabelEncoder()
# Fit the label encoder on the class labels
label_encoder.fit(class_labels)
# Transform the labels for the training dataset
train_labels_encoded = label_encoder.transform(train_labels)
# Transform the labels for the validation dataset
validation_labels_encoded = label_encoder.transform(validation_labels)
# Transform the labels for the testing dataset
test_labels_encoded = label_encoder.transform(test_labels)
# Normalize the pixel values
# Train files
train_ds = train_ds.map(lambda x, y: (x / 255.0, y))
# Validate files
validation_ds = validation_ds.map(lambda x, y: (x / 255.0, y))
# Test files
test_ds = test_ds.map(lambda x, y: (x / 255.0, y))
#TRAINING VISUALIZATION
#Count the occurrences of each category in the column
count = df_train['label'].value_counts()
# Create a figure with 2 subplots
fig, axs = plt.subplots(1, 2, figsize=(12, 6), facecolor='white')
# Plot a pie chart on the first subplot
palette = sns.color_palette("viridis")
sns.set_palette(palette)
axs[0].pie(count, labels=count.index, autopct='%1.1f%%', startangle=140)
axs[0].set_title('Distribution of Training Categories')
# Plot a bar chart on the second subplot
sns.barplot(x=count.index, y=count.values, ax=axs[1], palette="viridis")
axs[1].set_title('Count of Training Categories')
# Adjust the layout
plt.tight_layout()
# Visualize
plt.show()
# TEST VISUALIZATION
count = df_test['label'].value_counts()
# Create a figure with 2 subplots
fig, axs = plt.subplots(1, 2, figsize=(12, 6), facec...
Facebook
TwitterScientists and engineers from the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Earth Resources Observation and Science Center (EROS) Cal/Val Center of Excellence (ECCOE) collected in situ measurements using field spectrometers to support the validation of surface reflectance products derived from Earth observing remote sensing imagery. Data provided in this data release were collected during select Earth observing satellite overpasses and tests during the months of May through October 2022. Data was collected at three field sites: the ground viewing radiometer (GVR) site on the USGS EROS facility in Minnehaha County, South Dakota, a private land holding near the City of Arlington in Brookings County, South Dakota, and a private land holding in Sanborn County, South Dakota. Each field collection file includes the calculated surface reflectance of each wavelength collected using a dual field spectrometer methodology. The dual field spectrometer methodology allows for the calculated surface reflectance of each wavelength to be computed using one or both of the spectrometers. The use of the dual field spectrometers system reduces uncertainty in the field measurements by accounting for changes in solar irradiance. Both single and dual spectrometer calculated surface reflectance are included with this dataset. The differing methodologies of the calculated surface reflectance data are denoted as "Single Spectrometer" and "Dual Spectrometer". Field spectrometer data are provided as Comma Separated Values (CSV) files and GeoPackage files. The 09 May 2022 and the 16 June 2022 collection data are calculated using single spectrometer only, due to a technical issue with a field spectrometer.
Facebook
TwitterWhy this Dataset? This dataset is showing positive correlation between CV and LB. Discussion Here
How is it Made? This contains 300 Ques/Ans dataset created by @yalickj + 200 Ques/Ans provided by the Competition.
Context retrieval is done using @mbanaei fantastic notebook.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
## Overview
Data Validation is a dataset for object detection tasks - it contains Cats annotations for 1,542 images.
## Getting Started
You can download this dataset for use within your own projects, or fork it into a workspace on Roboflow to create your own model.
## License
This dataset is available under the [CC BY 4.0 license](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/CC BY 4.0).
Facebook
TwitterFive models are trained using various input masking probabilities (IMP). Each resulting model is validated using the heavily masked validation dataset of 13596 samples (5668 positive) to evaluate their performance in the context of missing input data. AUC values for the optimal training IMP are shown, along with those achieved with no input masking (NIM). Bold font indicates the highest AUC in the table. Results for other IMP values are provided in the S1 File.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
## Overview
Validation Data Set is a dataset for object detection tasks - it contains Microscopic Eggs annotations for 300 images.
## Getting Started
You can download this dataset for use within your own projects, or fork it into a workspace on Roboflow to create your own model.
## License
This dataset is available under the [CC BY 4.0 license](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/CC BY 4.0).
Facebook
TwitterOur location data powers the most advanced address validation solutions for enterprise backend and frontend systems.
A global, standardized, self-hosted location dataset containing all administrative divisions, cities, and zip codes for 247 countries.
All geospatial data for address data validation is updated weekly to maintain the highest data quality, including challenging countries such as China, Brazil, Russia, and the United Kingdom.
Use cases for the Address Validation at Zip Code Level Database (Geospatial data)
Address capture and address validation
Address autocomplete
Address verification
Reporting and Business Intelligence (BI)
Master Data Mangement
Logistics and Supply Chain Management
Sales and Marketing
Product Features
Dedicated features to deliver best-in-class user experience
Multi-language support including address names in local and foreign languages
Comprehensive city definitions across countries
Data export methodology
Our location data packages are offered in variable formats, including .csv. All geospatial data for address validation are optimized for seamless integration with popular systems like Esri ArcGIS, Snowflake, QGIS, and more.
Why do companies choose our location databases
Enterprise-grade service
Full control over security, speed, and latency
Reduce integration time and cost by 30%
Weekly updates for the highest quality
Seamlessly integrated into your software
Note: Custom address validation packages are available. Please submit a request via the above contact button for more details.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
The Procurement Validation Dataset was created within the framework of the State Research Programme project "Analysis of the Applicability of Artificial Intelligence Methods in the Field of European Union Fund Projects".
The dataset consists of 30 procurement documents evaluated by CFCA experts. The procurement checklists prepared by the experts have been transformed into machine-readable form. For each procurement, 168 questions are asked regarding its compliance with legislation, and each question has an answer provided.
The dataset is divided into two subsets: a development dataset (10 procurements) and an evaluation dataset (20 procurements). The dataset consists of:
1) questions based on the checklist S.7.1.-PL-21 (09.12.2019 edition);
2) a labeled dataset corresponding to 30 procurements evaluated by CFCA.
The dataset is distributed under the CC-BY-NC-SA license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ When using this dataset, please cite as:
Project "Analysis of the Applicability of Artificial Intelligence Methods in the Field of European Union Fund Projects" (VPP-CFLA-Mākslīgais intelekts-2024/1-0003). Procurement Validation Dataset. Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Facebook
TwitterThis dataset provides a common validation set for estimates of gross primary productivity. This data represents a subset of all predictions made in the model inputs and outputs that were converted to GPP based on a light use efficiency. The data was subsetted for only days were all light estimates could be produced. This dataset is part of a larger data release of inputs and outputs from a model to predict light at the stream surface and within the water column for 173 streams and rivers across the continental United States. The complete release contains model input data, modeled estimates of light at the stream surface and within the water column, and modeled estimates of gross primary productivity.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
## Overview
Agrisense Validation Dataset is a dataset for object detection tasks - it contains Rice Plants annotations for 200 images.
## Getting Started
You can download this dataset for use within your own projects, or fork it into a workspace on Roboflow to create your own model.
## License
This dataset is available under the [CC BY 4.0 license](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/CC BY 4.0).
Facebook
TwitterMIT Licensehttps://opensource.org/licenses/MIT
License information was derived automatically
## Overview
Drone Validation Dataset is a dataset for object detection tasks - it contains Drone annotations for 560 images.
## Getting Started
You can download this dataset for use within your own projects, or fork it into a workspace on Roboflow to create your own model.
## License
This dataset is available under the [MIT license](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/MIT).
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
## Overview
New Dataset For Validation is a dataset for semantic segmentation tasks - it contains Free Space annotations for 404 images.
## Getting Started
You can download this dataset for use within your own projects, or fork it into a workspace on Roboflow to create your own model.
## License
This dataset is available under the [CC BY 4.0 license](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/CC BY 4.0).
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
## Overview
K Fold Cross Validation is a dataset for object detection tasks - it contains People annotations for 3,500 images.
## Getting Started
You can download this dataset for use within your own projects, or fork it into a workspace on Roboflow to create your own model.
## License
This dataset is available under the [CC BY 4.0 license](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/CC BY 4.0).
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
## Overview
Part Validation is a dataset for object detection tasks - it contains Objects annotations for 2,152 images.
## Getting Started
You can download this dataset for use within your own projects, or fork it into a workspace on Roboflow to create your own model.
## License
This dataset is available under the [CC BY 4.0 license](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/CC BY 4.0).
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
## Overview
FLIR Validation Dataset is a dataset for object detection tasks - it contains Valid annotations for 1,366 images.
## Getting Started
You can download this dataset for use within your own projects, or fork it into a workspace on Roboflow to create your own model.
## License
This dataset is available under the [CC BY 4.0 license](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/CC BY 4.0).
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
## Overview
Object Detection Validation Dataset is a dataset for object detection tasks - it contains Vehicles And Traffic Signs annotations for 249 images.
## Getting Started
You can download this dataset for use within your own projects, or fork it into a workspace on Roboflow to create your own model.
## License
This dataset is available under the [CC BY 4.0 license](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/CC BY 4.0).
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Dataset necessary for DocTOR utility.
DocTOR (Direct fOreCast Target On Reaction), is a utility written in python3.9 (using the conda workframe) that allows the user to upload a list of Uniprot IDs and Adverse reactions (from the available models) in order to study the relationship between the two.
On output the program will assign a positive or negative class to the protein, assessing its possible involvement in the selected ADRs onset.
DocTOR exploits the data coming from T-ARDIS [https://doi.org/10.1093/database/baab068] to train different Machine Learning approaches (SVM, RF, NN) using network topological measurements as features.
The prediction coming from the single trained models are combined in a meta-predictor exploiting three different voting systems.
The results of the meta-predictor together with the ones from the single ML method will be available in the output log file (named "predictions_community" or "predictions_curated" based on the database type).
The DocTOR utility is avaiable at https://github.com/cristian931/DocTOR
Facebook
Twitterhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
By tasksource (From Huggingface) [source]
The tasksource/leandojo: File Validation, Training, and Testing Statistics dataset is a comprehensive collection of information regarding the validation, training, and testing processes of files in the tasksource/leandojo repository. This dataset is essential for gaining insights into the file management practices within this specific repository.
The dataset consists of three distinct files: validation.csv, train.csv, and test.csv. Each file serves a unique purpose in providing statistics and information about the different stages involved in managing files within the repository.
In validation.csv, you will find detailed information about the validation process undergone by each file. This includes data such as file paths within the repository (file_path), full names of each file (full_name), associated commit IDs (commit), traced tactics implemented (traced_tactics), URLs pointing to each file (url), and respective start and end dates for validation.
train.csv focuses on providing valuable statistics related to the training phase of files. Here, you can access data such as file paths within the repository (file_path), full names of individual files (full_name), associated commit IDs (commit), traced tactics utilized during training activities (traced_tactics), URLs linking to each specific file undergoing training procedures (url).
Lastly, test.csv encompasses pertinent statistics concerning testing activities performed on different files within the tasksource/leandojo repository. This data includes information such as file paths within the repo structure (file_path), full names assigned to each individual file tested (full_name) , associated commit IDs linked with these files' versions being tested(commit) , traced tactics incorporated during testing procedures regarded(traced_tactics) ,relevant URLs directing to specific tested files(url).
By exploring this comprehensive dataset consisting of three separate CSV files - validation.csv, train.csv, test.csv - researchers can gain crucial insights into how effective strategies pertaining to validating ,training or testing tasks have been implemented in order to maintain high-quality standards within the tasksource/leandojo repository
Familiarize Yourself with the Dataset Structure:
- The dataset consists of three separate files: validation.csv, train.csv, and test.csv.
- Each file contains multiple columns providing different information about file validation, training, and testing.
Explore the Columns:
- 'file_path': This column represents the path of the file within the repository.
- 'full_name': This column displays the full name of each file.
- 'commit': The commit ID associated with each file is provided in this column.
- 'traced_tactics': The tactics traced in each file are listed in this column.
- 'url': This column provides the URL of each file.
Understand Each File's Purpose:
Validation.csv - This file contains information related to the validation process of files in the tasksource/leandojo repository.
Train.csv - Utilize this file if you need statistics and information regarding the training phase of files in tasksource/leandojo repository.
Test.csv - For insights into statistics and information about testing individual files within tasksource/leandojo repository, refer to this file.
- Generate Insights & Analyze Data:
- Once you have a clear understanding of each column's purpose, you can start generating insights from your analysis using various statistical techniques or machine learning algorithms.
Explore patterns or trends by examining specific columns such as 'traced_tactics' or analyzing multiple columns together.
Combine Multiple Files (if necessary):
If required, you can merge/correlate data across different csv files based on common fields such as 'file_path', 'full_name', or 'commit'.
Visualize the Data (Optional):
To enhance your analysis, consider creating visualizations such as plots, charts, or graphs. Visualization can offer a clear representation of patterns or relationships within the dataset.
Obtain Further Information:
If you need additional details about any specific file, make use of the provided 'url' column to access further information.
Remember that this guide provides a general overview of how to utilize this dataset effectively. Feel ...
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
The ETHOS.ActivityAssure dataset is an aggregated activity dataset derived from the HETUS 2010 time use survey. It is intended to enable reusable and reproducible validation of various behavior models.
The ETHOS.ActivityAssure software framework belongs to this dataset, and together they can be used to validate activity profiles, e.g. the results of an occupant behavior model. It provides modules for preprocessing and categorising activity profiles, and comparing them to the statistics in this dataset using indicators and plots. It also contains the code that was used to create this dataset out of the HETUS 2010 data, so that the generation of this dataset is fully reproducible.
The HETUS dataset consists of many single-day activity profiles. These cannot be made publicly accessible due to data protection regulations. The idea of the ETHOS.ActivityAssure dataset is to aggregate these activity profiles using a meaningful classification, to provide behavior statistics for different types of activity profiles. For that, the attributes country, sex, work status, and day type are used.
Human behavior is complex, and in order to thorougly validate it, multiple aspects have to be taken into account. Therefore, the ETHOS.ActivityAssure dataset contains distributions for duration and frequency of each activity, as well as the temporal distribution throughout the day. For that purpose, a set of 15 common activity groups is defined. The mapping from the 108 activity codes used in HEUTS 2010 is provided as part of the validation framework.
For convenience, the ETHOS.ActivityAssure dataset is provided both as .tar.gz and as .zip archive. Both files contain the same content, the full activity validation dataset.
Additionally, the document ActivityAssure_data_set_description.pdf contains a more thorough description of the dataset, including its file structure, the content and meaning of its files, and examples on how to use it.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Advances in neuroimaging, genomic, motion tracking, eye-tracking and many other technology-based data collection methods have led to a torrent of high dimensional datasets, which commonly have a small number of samples because of the intrinsic high cost of data collection involving human participants. High dimensional data with a small number of samples is of critical importance for identifying biomarkers and conducting feasibility and pilot work, however it can lead to biased machine learning (ML) performance estimates. Our review of studies which have applied ML to predict autistic from non-autistic individuals showed that small sample size is associated with higher reported classification accuracy. Thus, we have investigated whether this bias could be caused by the use of validation methods which do not sufficiently control overfitting. Our simulations show that K-fold Cross-Validation (CV) produces strongly biased performance estimates with small sample sizes, and the bias is still evident with sample size of 1000. Nested CV and train/test split approaches produce robust and unbiased performance estimates regardless of sample size. We also show that feature selection if performed on pooled training and testing data is contributing to bias considerably more than parameter tuning. In addition, the contribution to bias by data dimensionality, hyper-parameter space and number of CV folds was explored, and validation methods were compared with discriminable data. The results suggest how to design robust testing methodologies when working with small datasets and how to interpret the results of other studies based on what validation method was used.