The resource provides a public inventory of archaeological sites in Iowa.

Comprehensive dataset of 2 Archaeological sites in Yamanashi, Japan as of June, 2025. Includes verified contact information (email, phone), geocoded addresses, customer ratings, reviews, business categories, and operational details. Perfect for market research, lead generation, competitive analysis, and business intelligence. Download a complimentary sample to evaluate data quality and completeness.

The map shows the georeferencing of the archaeological sites in the Liguria Region. The data derive from the Liguria Region's official database, managed by the Culture and Entertainment sector. Coverage: Entire Regional Territory - Origin: Georeferencing on Regional Technical Map - sc. 1:5000 - ETRF89 Projection System

Various physical attributes of the Earth’s surface are factors that influence local topography and indirectly influence human behaviour in terms of habitation locations. The determination of geomorphological setting plays an important role in archaeological landscape research. Several landform types can be distinguished by characteristic geomorphic attributes that portray the landscape surrounding a settlement and influence its ability to sustain a population. Geomorphometric landform information, derived from digital elevation models (DEMs), such as the ASTER Global DEM, can provide useful insights into the processes shaping landscapes. This work examines the influence of landform classification on the settlement locations of Bronze Age (Minoan) Crete, focusing on the districts of Phaistos, Kavousi and Vrokastro. The landform classification was based on the topographic position index (TPI) and deviation from mean elevation (DEV) analysis to highlight slope steepness of various landform classes, characterizing the surrounding landscape environment of the settlements locations. The outcomes indicate no interrelationship between the settlement locations and topography during the Early Minoan period, but a significant interrelationship exists during the later Minoan periods with the presence of more organised societies. The landform classification can provide insights into factors favouring human habitation and can contribute to archaeological predictive modelling.

Extract data about Sites or customize it

This hosted feature layer has been published in RI State Plane Feet NAD 83 Historic site point building property or monument listed on the National Register of Historic Places by the RI Historic Preservation & Heritage Commission.

This dataset contains monthly visitor counts for 290 archaeological sites and museums across Mexico from January 1996 to February 2025. The data is sourced from the National Institute of Anthropology and History (INAH) and provides insights into cultural tourism trends over nearly three decades.Dataset DetailsThe data is disaggregated by:State: Location of the site or museumSite Type: Archaeological site or museumVisitor Type: Free or paid entryNationality: Domestic or foreign visitorsAdditional ResourcesPython Analysis Script: Demonstrates data analysis using STL decomposition to extract trends, with a line plot comparing the original series and the calculated trend.Sample Visualizations: Includes two example charts showcasing domestic and foreign visitor trends at Chichén Itzá.Requirements File: A requirements.txt file listing necessary Python dependencies for analysis.Data Source: INAH Statistics PortalThis dataset is valuable for researchers, policymakers, and data enthusiasts interested in cultural heritage tourism, visitor trends, and time-series analysis.

This web application allows the public to search and find information about contaminated sites caused by a release of hazardous materials or hazardous waste products and print out results.

Content used to generate the map of villages and some of the coastal cultural locations such as historic and archaeological sites, petroglyphs, and locations associated with Samoan myths and legends.

Testing of four prehistoric and three historic sites was performed by New South Associates and Geo-Marine Inc. for the United States Air Force, Shaw Air Force Base at the Poinsett Weapons Range. These sites were identified during a Phase I survey of a portion of the weapons range by Kreisa et al. (1995) and were recommended for further testing to determine their National Register eligibility. The prehistoric sites are located in a proposed target area and the historic sites within a fence line construction clear cut zone. The testing phase was conducted in order to provide final eligibility statements in order to determine if and how significant cultural resources would be impacted by these activities. The work was conducted in accordance with and in partial fulfillment of the U.S. Air Force obligations under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended (FL-96-515), the Archaeological and Historic Preservation Act of 1974, as amended (FL-93-291), the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (FL-90-190), Executive Order 11593, “Protection and enhancement of the Cultural Environment,” AIRFA, and NAGPRA. The sites were assessed using National Register Bulletin 36 and were evaluated using the notion that “the significance of an archaeological site is based on the potential of the site to contribute to the scientific or humanistic understanding of the past.” This management summary is intended to provide a synopsis of the archaeological testing of the seven sites and does not include any detailed analysis of the archaeological collections. It is intended only to provide the client with recommendations regarding the National Register eligibility of the sites in question and to illustrate that the proposed field work has been accomplished.

The Royal Exhibition Building Western Forecourt Collection consists of 1,566 artefacts excavated during an archaeological dig of the western forecourt of the Royal Exhibition Building, Melbourne, in November 2009. The archaeological dig investigated and recorded evidence of the 1880 iteration of the western forecourt garden. The dig also recorded evidence of various incarnations of the site over time, prior to its conversion into an asphalt car park in the 1950s.

Context

Mesoamerican cultures are the early advanced civilizations of Mexicoand Central America. First, there were many unique groups inhabiting this region over time but for our purposes, we are going to focus in on the Maya. The Maya flourished with their great cities from about 250 CE until around 1400. They covered southern Mexico, Guatemala and Honduras. They had a highly developed written language and mathematics, plus they had an amazing knowledge of astronomy. Their cities were amazing urban centres. They included amazing pyramids, like this from Tikal, one of the largest sites left of the Maya.

https://cancunadventuretours.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Tulum_Express_Tour_1.jpg%20=400x400" alt="Tulum">

Tulum, Yucatán, Mehiko.

Content

This dataset consists of 332 Maya Sites that are located in the present-day Mexico, Honduras, Guatemalaand Belize.

https://cdn.wallpapersafari.com/32/70/Pul4ZH.jpg%20=600x400" alt="Tulum">

Tulum, Yucatán, Mehiko.

In 2018, archeological sites administered by the Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia (Nacional Institute of Anthropology and History) in Mexico were visited by nearly 16.7 million people, out of which 10.89 million were Mexicans and 5.77 million foreigners.

Explore Water-saturated sites (Archaeology) through data • Key facts: number of authors, number of books, books, authors, publication dates, book publishers • Real-time news, visualizations and datasets

This dataset includes information for the sample sites described in the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Scientific-Investigations Report 2024-5071, available at https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20245071. The sample sites were at surface-water bodies on the Hawaiian Islands of Kauaʻi, Oʻahu, Maui, and Hawaiʻi. Site information is provided in a comma-separated-value (csv) file and a shapefile. The shapefile contains the same information as the csv file but is formatted for use in a geospatial information system.

Database is now availabe online through ECAI and can be updated through a password-controlled web browser interface;Initial data source was UNESCO web site, supplemented by individual work on different countires/regions;A database of cultural heritage sites assembled by volunteers at the Archaeological Computing Laboratory, University of Sydney

In 1976, the Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission (M-NCPPC) created the Locational Atlas & Index of Historic Sites, which identifies resources that are potentially historic within the county. Resources listed on the Atlas are protected from demolition or “substantial alteration” under the County Code. For more information, see Chapter 24A of the County Code.For more information, contact: Historic Preservation Montgomery County Planning Department, MNCPPC T: 301-650-3400

This dataset contains key characteristics about the data described in the Data Descriptor Geolocation of unpublished archaeological sites in the Peruvian Amazon. Contents:

    1. human readable metadata summary table in CSV format


    2. machine readable metadata file in JSON format

The Cline Mesa archaeological sites are part of an extensive settlement complex called the Cline Terrace Complex at the northwestern end of the Tonto Basin, along the eastern bank of Tonto Creek. The Arizona State University, Office of Cultural Resource Management, Roosevelt Platform Mound Study (RPMS) divided the Cline Terrace Complex into three management groups: the Mound, Bandolero, and Indian Point management groups. The Cline Terrace Mound group included the Cline Terrace mound, which is the largest site in the complex and located at the center of the complex, and seven nearby sites. The mound group sites are treated in a separate report volume and the associated data are reported separately (Please see https://core.tdar.org/project/394032). The Cline Mesa sites consist of the remaining 35 archaeological sites along the terraces forming the eastern bank of Tonto Creek and extending to the creek’s confluence with Greenback Creek. Please note that these sites are not necessarily representative of the temporal range in the Cline Mesa settlement complex, as many are Hohokam Late Classic period residential sites on Tonto National Forest land. The Cline Mesa Sites report volumes and data summarize results from the surface collections and excavations at the 35 sites in the complex.

The Cline Mesa Data table Ceramic Bowls and Jars from All Contexts presents a summary of the basic ceramic vessel forms - bowls and jars - recovered from all investigated contexts (both screened and unscreened) at Cline Mesa sites (except Cline Terrace Mound, which is reported separately).The table lists archaeological sites designated by Arizona State Museum (ASM) site numbers (without the "AZ" common to all ASM numbers) (e.g., U:8:25 = ASM site number AZ U:8:25). It then lists designated archaeological contexts - strata - at each site. The strata represent major natural or cultural depositional events such as erosional fill, roof fall, floor contexts, and sterile substrate. Strata are depicted as horizontal rows of interconnected boxes on a Harris Matrix. In this table, the archaeological contexts - strata - are identified by a combination of numbering systems: the ASM site number, a colon, the feature number, and the stratum letter designation (EX: U:3:198:006A, U:3:198:006B). Within a feature, each stratum is designated by the feature number (e.g., 10, 11, 12, etc.) and a letter that designates a particular stratum (e.g., A, B, C). The letters are assigned in descending order. Mixed levels and artifacts collected out of context are designated by a "?". Artifacts from each feature (or mixed context) are tallied according to strata. Please see column metadata for further detail. Please also see the Cline Mesa strata data tables for further data about each stratum, including the assigned stratum type, at the following tDAR urls: http://core.tdar.org/dataset/394488 http://core.tdar.org/dataset/394486 http://core.tdar.org/dataset/394487 http://core.tdar.org/dataset/394489 http://core.tdar.org/dataset/394490 http://core.tdar.org/dataset/394485 http://core.tdar.org/dataset/394484

The table then provides the frequency (count) of distinct ceramic bowls and jars assigned to different decorated ceramic types for each stratum. Note that the table presents a count of distinct vessels (i.e., groups of sherds or single sherds assigned to individual vessels) identified to decorated ceramic type. More specifically, it presents a count of rim sherds that were assigned to a single vessel (The Stage 2 Ceramic Decorated/Intrusive analysis examined rim sherds to determine vessel form and ceramic type for individually designated vessels).

The Cline Mesa Data tables were originally published in the Roosevelt Platform Mound Monograph Series No. 9 titled “Salado Residential Settlements on Tonto Creek, Roosevelt Platform Mound Study: Report on the Cline Mesa Sites, Cline Terrace Complex, Parts 1 and 2.” The tables were published in an appendix at the end of the volume (end of Part 2). Please see the report volume at the following tDAR URL: https://core.tdar.org/document/394299

This dataset takes up the location of heritage sites in Wallonia: — Owned by World Heritage: These sites are inscribed on UNESCO’s heritage — Belonging to property classified as exceptional. These exceptional assets are of major interest. The list is drawn up by Decree of the Walloon Government (AGW – 7 February 2013). It shall be reviewed every three years. The list of properties presented corresponds to the exceptional patrimopine established in 2017. Thus, a site belonging to both exceptional and global goods appears twice in the dataset. Heritage sites are classified into three parts: architectural ensembles, archaeological sites, and other sites