******* had the highest level of the Human Development Index (HDI) worldwide in 2023 with a value of *****. With a score of ****, ****** followed closely behind *********** and had the second-highest level of human development in that year. The rise of the Asian tigers In the decades after the Cold War, the four so-called Asian tigers, South Korea, Singapore, Taiwan, and Hong Kong (now a Special Administrative Region of China) experienced rapid economic growth and increasing human development. At number eight and number 13 of the HDI, respectively, *********************** are the only Asian locations within the top-15 highest HDI scores. Both locations have experienced tremendous economic growth since the 1980’s and 1990’s. In 1980, the per capita GDP of Hong Kong was ***** U.S. dollars, increasing throughout the decades until reaching ****** in 2023, which is expected to continue to increase in the future. Meanwhile, in 1989, Singapore had a GDP of nearly ** billion U.S. dollars, which has risen to nearly *** billion U.S. dollars today and is also expected to keep increasing. Growth of the UAE The United Arab Emirates (UAE) is the only Middle Eastern country besides Israel within the highest ranking HDI scores globally. Within the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region, the UAE has the third-largest GDP behind Saudi Arabia and Israel, reaching nearly *** billion U.S. dollars by 2022. Per capita, the UAE GDP was around ****** U.S. dollars in 1989, and has nearly doubled to ****** U.S. dollars by 2021. Moreover, this is expected to reach over ****** U.S. dollars by 2029. On top of being a major oil producer, the UAE has become a hub for finance and business and attracts millions of tourists annually.

In 2021, Massachusetts, Connecticut, and Minnesota had the highest Human Development Index (HDI) score of any other states at ****. Many more states had a score just below this at ****. Mississippi had the lowest HDI score at ****, and the U.S. average was ****.

The average for 2023 based on 27 countries was 0.915 points. The highest value was in Denmark: 0.962 points and the lowest value was in Bulgaria: 0.845 points. The indicator is available from 1980 to 2023. Below is a chart for all countries where data are available.

Compared to other African countries, Seychelles scored the highest in the Human Development Index (HDI) in 2022. The country also ranked 67th globally, as one of the countries with a very high human development. This was followed by Mauritius, Libya, Egypt, and Tunisia, with scores ranging from 0.80 to 0.73 points. On the other hand, Central African Republic, South Sudan, and Somalia were among the countries in the region with the lowest index scores, indicating a low level of human development.

The average for 2023 based on 12 countries was 0.787 points. The highest value was in Chile: 0.878 points and the lowest value was in Venezuela: 0.709 points. The indicator is available from 1980 to 2023. Below is a chart for all countries where data are available.

Context

It seeks to identify the influence of the human development index and the fatality rate of COVID-19.

Content

This dataframe contains the countries, number of cases and deaths until April 14, 2020. And the HDI - 2014 of the countries.

tx is rate of fatality (death/cases)

Acknowledgements

https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200413-sitrep-84-covid-19.pdf?sfvrsn=44f511ab_2 https://www.br.undp.org/content/brazil/pt/home/idh0/rankings/idh-global.html

Inspiration

Your data will be in front of the world's largest data science community. What questions do you want to see answered?

The human development index (HDI) score of Russia slightly increased in 2023, having reached *****. That was the highest observation since 1990. The HDI is a statistic that combines life-expectancy, education levels and GDP per capita. Countries with scores over 0.800 are considered to have very high levels of development, compared with countries that score lower. The HDI score of Russia declined between 1990 and 1995 before recovering from 2000 onwards.

The Human development index (HDI) for European countries in 2022 shows that although all of the countries in this statistic have scores which imply high levels of development, ************* score of ***** was the highest in this year. The HDI is a statistic that combines life-expectancy, education levels and GDP per capita. Countries with scores over ***** are considered to have very high levels of development, compared with countries that score lower.

The average for 2023 based on 11 countries was 0.739 points. The highest value was in Singapore: 0.946 points and the lowest value was in Cambodia: 0.606 points. The indicator is available from 1980 to 2023. Below is a chart for all countries where data are available.

The Human Development Index (HDI) of Germany has increased from ***** in 1990 to ***** by 2021, indicating that Germany has reached very high levels of human development. The HDI itself is a statistic that combines life-expectancy, education levels and GDP per capita. Countries with scores over ***** are considered to have very high levels of development, compared with countries that score lower. Germany's HDI score has increased from ***** in 1990 to ***** by 2019, implying that Germany has consistently had a very high level of human development.

The Human Development Index (HDI) of Ireland from 1990 to 2023 shows that after 1995, Ireland's HDI score increased quite rapidly, so that by 2024 it's score of 0.949 gave it the status of a very highly developed country. The HDI itself is a statistic that combines life-expectancy, education levels and GDP per capita. Countries with scores over 0.700 are considered to have high levels of development, compared with countries that score lower.

Univariate and multivariate analyses for PFS and OS.

The Human Development Index (HDI) of the United Kingdom has increased from ***** in 1990 to ***** by 2023, indicating that the UK has reached very high levels of human development. HDI is a statistic that combines life-expectancy, education levels and GDP per capita. Countries with scores over 0.800 are considered to have very high levels of development, compared with countries that score lower.

Multivariate analysis comparing established prognostic biomarkers from the literature to variables identified as significant in the multivariate analysis, utilising a forward selection strategy for OS.

ObjectivesTo investigate the clinical value of hemodynamic parameters derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) in predicting glioma genotypes including isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation, 1p/19q codeletion status and the tumor proliferation index (Ki-67) noninvasively. And to compare the diagnostic performance of parameters of distributed parameter (DP)model and extended Tofts (Ex-Tofts) model.Materials and methodsDynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) data of patients with glioma were prospectively enrolled from April 2021 to May 2023. The imaging data were analyzed using DP and Ex-Tofts model for evaluating the perfusion and permeability characteristics of glioma. Comparisons were performed according to IDH genotype in all glioma patients and 1p/19q codeletion in IDH mutation glioma patients. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated for DCE-MRI parameters. The Spearman rank correlation coefficients were calculated between DCE MRI parameters and Ki-67 index.ResultsIn IDH-mutation gliomas, a higher blood flow (F) was found in 1p/19q codeletion gliomas than in 1p/19q intact gliomas. No parameter derived from Ex-Tofts model showed significant differences in predicting 1p/19q status. Fractional volume of interstitial space (Ve) derived from both the DP and Ex-Tofts models exhibited optimal performance in predicting IDH genotype (AUC = 0.818, 0.828, respectively). Ve also showed the highest correlations with Ki-67 LI within their respective models in all gliomas (ρ = 0.62, 0.61), indicating comparable moderate positive associations. Ki-67ConclusionDP model showed a clear advantage in predicting 1p/19q status compared to Ex-Tofts model. The DP and Ex-Tofts models performed similarly in predicting IDH mutation and Ki-67 index.

In 2021, South Africa scored 0.71 in the Human Development Index (HDI), which indicated a high level of development. The country experienced a drop in the HDI score compared to the previous year, which was 0.73. However, an improvement was recorded from 2005 onwards. At that year, South Africa's score was 0.63, meaning that the country had a medium human development. The categorization changed from medium to high in 2013.

Patient variables stratified by patient and tumour characteristics, treatment and comorbidities.

El promedio para 2023 fue de 0.915 points.El valor más alto fue en Dinamarca: 0.962 points y el valor más bajo fue en Bulgaria: 0.845 points. A continuación se muestra una tabla de todos los países en los que se dispone de datos.

The Human Development Index (HDI) of Malta has increased from 0.730 in 1990 to 0.918 by 2021, indicating that the country has reached very high levels of human development. HDI is a statistic that combines life-expectancy, education levels and GDP per capita. Countries with scores over 0.800 are considered to have very high levels of development, compared with countries that score lower.

Low and high NLR and PNI group frequencies.