Incident-based crime statistics (actual incidents, rate per 100,000 population, percentage change in rate, unfounded incidents, percent unfounded, total cleared, cleared by charge, cleared otherwise, persons charged, adults charged, youth charged / not charged), by detailed violations (violent, property, traffic, drugs, other Federal Statutes), Canada, provinces, territories, Census Metropolitan Areas and Canadian Forces Military Police, 1998 to 2024.

Number, percentage and rate (per 100,000 population) of persons accused of homicide, by racialized identity group (total, by racialized identity group; racialized identity group; South Asian; Chinese; Black; Filipino; Arab; Latin American; Southeast Asian; West Asian; Korean; Japanese; other racialized identity group; multiple racialized identity; racialized identity, but racialized identity group is unknown; rest of the population; unknown racialized identity group), gender (all genders; male; female; gender unknown) and region (Canada; Atlantic region; Quebec; Ontario; Prairies region; British Columbia; territories), 2019 to 2024.

Incident-based crime statistics (actual incidents, rate per 100,000 population, percentage change in rate, unfounded incidents, percent unfounded, total cleared, cleared by charge, cleared otherwise, persons charged, adults charged, youth charged / not charged), by detailed violations (violent, property, traffic, drugs, other Federal Statutes), police services in Ontario, 1998 to 2024.

The public use microdata file (PUMF) from the General Social Survey – Canadians' Safety is to better understand how Canadians perceive crime and the justice system and to capture information on their experiences of victimization. This survey is the only national survey of self-reported victimization and is collected in all provinces and territories. The survey allows for estimates of the numbers and characteristics of victims and criminal incidents. Topics covered are: neighbourhood safety, crime prevention, risks and perceptions, abuse by current spouse/partner, crime incidents, criminal harassment, confidence in police, hate crimes, cyber bullying, experiences of discrimination, health and well-being and also a variety of socio-demographic measures. Cycle 34 is the seventh cycle of the GSS to collect data on victimization. Previous cycles were conducted in 1988, 1993, 1999, 2004, and 2009, 2014.

This Voice of the People poll seeks the opinions of Canadians, on predominantly economic, political, and social issues. The questions ask opinions about corruption, democracy, government, and world issues. There are also questions on topics such as the activities of the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), familiarity with global institutions, immigration, foreign aid, trust in people, and bribery. There are also questions on other topics of interest such as volunteering, the role of the World Bank, the gap between the rich and the poor, crime, political ideology, and religiosity. The respondents were also asked questions so that they could be grouped according to geographic and social variables. Topics of interest include: corruption; global institutions; International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC); politics; foreign aid; humanitarian aid; democracy; and trust. Basic demographic variables are also included.

In December 2006, Environics Research conducted a major national survey of Muslims and multiculturalism in Canada, as part of its ongoing syndicated FOCUS CANADA research program. The research consisted of two national telephone public opinion surveys: - National survey with a representative sample of 2,045 Canadians (18 years plus) - National survey with a representative sample of 500 Muslims living in Canada The focus of this research is on the presence and experience of Muslims in this country, and draws direct comparisons with similar research conducted in 13 other countries by the Pew Research Center (many of the same research questions were used to provide for direct country-to-country comparisons). The Pew research included Muslim over-samples in Great Britain, France, Germany and Spain. Some of the topics covered in this research: General Public: - General attitudes about immigration in Canada - Personal contact with different ethnic groups (including Muslims) - Perceived discrimination against ethnic groups - General attitudes towards Muslims - Concerns about Muslims and terrorism - Islamic identity and extremism among Muslims - Integration of Muslims and other ethnic minorities into Canadian society - Canadian foreign policy and the mission in Afghanistan Muslims - Experience of being Muslim in Canada - Concern about the future of Muslims in Canada - Self identification within the Muslim community - The role and rights of women in ethnic communities - Islamic identity and extremism among Muslims - Integration of Muslims and other ethnic minorities into Canadian society - Canadian foreign policy and the mission in Afghanistan Please note, the cases in this dataset are comprised only of Muslim respondents. Data from the other component of this survey - the survey of the general population - may be found in the dataset titled "EFC064." Environics Focus Canada - Survey of Muslims in Canada (Dec 2006) Study Overview: http://queensu.ca/cora/_files/Environics%20Muslims%20in%20Canada%20-%20Overview.pdf Environics Focus Canada - Survey of Muslims in Canada (Dec 2006) Methodology: http://queensu.ca/cora/_files/Methodology%20for%20Survey%20of%20Muslims.pdf Copyright (c) 2007 - Environics Research Group

The International Social Survey Program (ISSP) is an ongoing program of crossnational collaboration. Formed in 1983, the group develops topical modules dealing with important areas of social science as supplements to regular national surveys. This collection, which focuses on national identity, contains data from Australia, Austria, Bulgaria, Canada, the Czech Republic, Germany, Great Britain, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Latvia, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, the Philippines, Poland, Russia, the Slovakian Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, and the United States. Respondents were asked to comment on various topics regarding national identity, such as how ''close'' they felt to their respective countries, national pride, their nations' relations with other countries, and their nations' treatment of immigrants and minority groups. Those queried were asked to describe the pride they felt towards their countries' accomplishments in the following areas: political influence, economics, social security, science and technology, sports, the arts, armed forces, history, and treatment of others. A series of questions probed for respondents' views regarding international relations, including foreign trade restrictions, international problem-solving attempts, foreign language education, the purchase of land by foreigners, the nationality of television programs and movies, and the benefits of membership in regional international organizations. Respondents were also asked to assess their countries' treatment of minority groups and immigrants. Topics covered the preservation of minority traditions, the impact of immigrant groups on crime, the economy, the job market, cultural openness, special provisions for political refugees, and the citizenship process.

Abstract (en): There has been little research on United States homicide rates from a long-term perspective, primarily because there has been no consistent data series on a particular place preceding the Uniform Crime Reports (UCR), which began its first full year in 1931. To fill this research gap, this project created a data series on homicides per capita for New York City that spans two centuries. The goal was to create a site-specific, individual-based data series that could be used to examine major social shifts related to homicide, such as mass immigration, urban growth, war, demographic changes, and changes in laws. Data were also gathered on various other sites, particularly in England, to allow for comparisons on important issues, such as the post-World War II wave of violence. The basic approach to the data collection was to obtain the best possible estimate of annual counts and the most complete information on individual homicides. The annual count data (Parts 1 and 3) were derived from multiple sources, including the Federal Bureau of Investigation's Uniform Crime Reports and Supplementary Homicide Reports, as well as other official counts from the New York City Police Department and the City Inspector in the early 19th century. The data include a combined count of murder and manslaughter because charge bargaining often blurs this legal distinction. The individual-level data (Part 2) were drawn from coroners' indictments held by the New York City Municipal Archives, and from daily newspapers. Duplication was avoided by keeping a record for each victim. The estimation technique known as "capture-recapture" was used to estimate homicides not listed in either source. Part 1 variables include counts of New York City homicides, arrests, and convictions, as well as the homicide rate, race or ethnicity and gender of victims, type of weapon used, and source of data. Part 2 includes the date of the murder, the age, sex, and race of the offender and victim, and whether the case led to an arrest, trial, conviction, execution, or pardon. Part 3 contains annual homicide counts and rates for various comparison sites including Liverpool, London, Kent, Canada, Baltimore, Los Angeles, Seattle, and San Francisco. There has been little research on United States homicide rates from a long-term perspective, primarily because there has been no consistent data series on a particular place preceding the Uniform Crime Reports (UCR), which began its first full year in 1931. To fill this research gap, this project created a data series on homicides per capita for New York City that spans two centuries. The goal was to create a site-specific, individual-based data series that could be used to examine major social shifts related to homicide, such as mass immigration, urban growth, war, demographic changes, and changes in laws. The researcher chose to focus on a specific geographic area because the composite national data did not provide the details needed for careful analysis. Data were also gathered on various other sites, particularly in England, to allow for comparisons on important issues, such as the post-World War II wave of violence. The basic approach to the data collection was to obtain the best possible estimate of annual counts and the most complete information on individual homicides. The annual count data (Parts 1 and 3) were derived from multiple sources, including the Federal Bureau of Investigation's Uniform Crime Reports and Supplementary Homicide Reports, as well as other official counts from the New York City Police Department and the City Inspector in the early 19th century. When there were discrepancies among sources, the principal investigator used the source giving the higher count, based on the assumption that missing information tends to bias toward an undercount. The data include a combined count of murder and manslaughter because charge bargaining often blurs this legal distinction. The following incidents were excluded from the counts: accidental homicides, infanticides, cases involving children under 5 except when evidence in individual cases made it clear that these were murders, women who died during the course of an abortion, riot victims, the killing of an offender during the course of an arrest, and legal executions. The individual-level data (Part 2) were drawn from coroners' indictments held by the New York City Municipal Archives, and from daily newspapers. Duplication was avoided by keeping a reco...

Forensic DNA Analysis Market Outlook

According to our latest research, the global Forensic DNA Analysis market size reached USD 2.1 billion in 2024, driven by the increasing adoption of advanced genetic technologies in criminal investigations and identity verification. The market is expected to expand at a robust CAGR of 8.3% from 2025 to 2033, reaching a projected value of USD 4.3 billion by the end of the forecast period. This impressive growth trajectory is primarily attributed to the rising demand for precise and rapid forensic solutions across law enforcement agencies, judicial systems, and disaster management authorities worldwide.

One of the most significant growth factors fueling the Forensic DNA Analysis market is the continuous technological advancements in DNA sequencing techniques. Innovations such as next-generation sequencing (NGS), rapid DNA analysis, and automation in sample processing have drastically improved the accuracy, speed, and scalability of forensic investigations. These advancements not only enhance the ability to solve complex criminal cases but also reduce the time required for analysis, making DNA evidence more accessible and reliable in judicial proceedings. Furthermore, the integration of artificial intelligence and machine learning in forensic software is enabling more sophisticated data interpretation, which is crucial for high-profile criminal cases and mass disaster victim identification.

Another key driver for the expansion of the Forensic DNA Analysis market is the increasing awareness and implementation of stringent regulatory standards for forensic laboratories worldwide. Governments and regulatory bodies are mandating the use of accredited DNA analysis protocols to ensure the credibility and admissibility of forensic evidence in courts. This has led to a surge in investments for upgrading laboratory infrastructure, purchasing state-of-the-art instruments, and training personnel in advanced forensic techniques. The growing emphasis on quality assurance and standardization is fostering market growth, particularly in countries with high crime rates and evolving legal frameworks.

The expanding applications of forensic DNA analysis beyond criminal investigations are also contributing to market growth. The use of DNA profiling in paternity testing, disaster victim identification, immigration cases, and historical investigations is gaining traction. With the rise in natural disasters and humanitarian crises, the need for rapid and reliable DNA-based identification methods has become more pronounced. Additionally, the increasing collaboration between forensic laboratories, law enforcement agencies, and academic institutions is propelling research and development activities, resulting in new product launches and improved analytical capabilities across the forensic DNA analysis ecosystem.

Regionally, North America continues to dominate the Forensic DNA Analysis market, accounting for the largest share in 2024, followed by Europe and Asia Pacific. The presence of well-established forensic infrastructure, ongoing government funding, and a high incidence of criminal cases in the United States and Canada are major contributors to the region's leadership. However, the Asia Pacific region is witnessing the fastest growth, driven by rapid modernization of forensic services, increasing crime rates, and rising government investments in public safety and judicial reforms. Europe also remains a significant market, supported by robust legal frameworks and cross-border forensic collaborations.

The introduction of the DNA Rapid Field Analyser is revolutionizing on-site forensic investigations by enabling immediate DNA profiling. This portable device allows law enforcement agencies to conduct DNA analysis directly at crime scenes, significantly reducing the time required to obtain results. The DNA Rapid Field Analyser enhances the efficiency of forensic workflows by eliminating the need to transport samples to a central laboratory, thereby accelerating the identification process. Its user-friendly interface and robust design make it ideal for field operations, providing reliable results even in challenging environments. As the demand for swift justice and timely resolution of cases grows, the adoption of such innovative technologies is expected to increase, further propelling the forens