RTB Maps is a cloud-based electronic Atlas. We used ArGIS 10 for Desktop with Spatial Analysis Extension, ArcGIS 10 for Server on-premise, ArcGIS API for Javascript, IIS web services based on .NET, and ArcGIS Online combining data on the cloud with data and applications on our local server to develop an Atlas that brings together many of the map themes related to development of roots, tubers and banana crops. The Atlas is structured to allow our participating scientists to understand the distribution of the crops and observe the spatial distribution of many of the obstacles to production of these crops. The Atlas also includes an application to allow our partners to evaluate the importance of different factors when setting priorities for research and development. The application uses weighted overlay analysis within a multi-criteria decision analysis framework to rate the importance of factors when establishing geographic priorities for research and development.Datasets of crop distribution maps, agroecology maps, biotic and abiotic constraints to crop production, poverty maps and other demographic indicators are used as a key inputs to multi-objective criteria analysis.Further metadata/references can be found here: http://gisweb.ciat.cgiar.org/RTBmaps/DataAvailability_RTBMaps.htmlDISCLAIMER, ACKNOWLEDGMENTS AND PERMISSIONS:This service is provided by Roots, Tubers and Bananas CGIAR Research Program as a public service. Use of this service to retrieve information constitutes your awareness and agreement to the following conditions of use.This online resource displays GIS data and query tools subject to continuous updates and adjustments. The GIS data has been taken from various, mostly public, sources and is supplied in good faith.RTBMaps GIS Data Disclaimer• The data used to show the Base Maps is supplied by ESRI.• The data used to show the photos over the map is supplied by Flickr.• The data used to show the videos over the map is supplied by Youtube.• The population map is supplied to us by CIESIN, Columbia University and CIAT.• The Accessibility map is provided by Global Environment Monitoring Unit - Joint Research Centre of the European Commission. Accessibility maps are made for a specific purpose and they cannot be used as a generic dataset to represent "the accessibility" for a given study area.• Harvested area and yield for banana, cassava, potato, sweet potato and yam for the year 200, is provided by EarthSat (University of Minnesota’s Institute on the Environment-Global Landscapes initiative and McGill University’s Land Use and the Global Environment lab). Dataset from Monfreda C., Ramankutty N., and Foley J.A. 2008.• Agroecology dataset: global edapho-climatic zones for cassava based on mean growing season, temperature, number of dry season months, daily temperature range and seasonality. Dataset from CIAT (Carter et al. 1992)• Demography indicators: Total and Rural Population from Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN) and CIAT 2004.• The FGGD prevalence of stunting map is a global raster datalayer with a resolution of 5 arc-minutes. The percentage of stunted children under five years old is reported according to the lowest available sub-national administrative units: all pixels within the unit boundaries will have the same value. Data have been compiled by FAO from different sources: Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS), UNICEF MICS, WHO Global Database on Child Growth and Malnutrition, and national surveys. Data provided by FAO – GIS Unit 2007.• Poverty dataset: Global poverty headcount and absolute number of poor. Number of people living on less than $1.25 or $2.00 per day. Dataset from IFPRI and CIATTHE RTBMAPS GROUP MAKES NO WARRANTIES OR GUARANTEES, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED AS TO THE COMPLETENESS, ACCURACY, OR CORRECTNESS OF THE DATA PORTRAYED IN THIS PRODUCT NOR ACCEPTS ANY LIABILITY, ARISING FROM ANY INCORRECT, INCOMPLETE OR MISLEADING INFORMATION CONTAINED THEREIN. ALL INFORMATION, DATA AND DATABASES ARE PROVIDED "AS IS" WITH NO WARRANTY, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. By accessing this website and/or data contained within the databases, you hereby release the RTB group and CGCenters, its employees, agents, contractors, sponsors and suppliers from any and all responsibility and liability associated with its use. In no event shall the RTB Group or its officers or employees be liable for any damages arising in any way out of the use of the website, or use of the information contained in the databases herein including, but not limited to the RTBMaps online Atlas product.APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT:• Desktop and web development - Ernesto Giron E. (GeoSpatial Consultant) e.giron.e@gmail.com• GIS Analyst - Elizabeth Barona. (Independent Consultant) barona.elizabeth@gmail.comCollaborators:Glenn Hyman, Bernardo Creamer, Jesus David Hoyos, Diana Carolina Giraldo Soroush Parsa, Jagath Shanthalal, Herlin Rodolfo Espinosa, Carlos Navarro, Jorge Cardona and Beatriz Vanessa Herrera at CIAT, Tunrayo Alabi and Joseph Rusike from IITA, Guy Hareau, Reinhard Simon, Henry Juarez, Ulrich Kleinwechter, Greg Forbes, Adam Sparks from CIP, and David Brown and Charles Staver from Bioversity International.Please note these services may be unavailable at times due to maintenance work.Please feel free to contact us with any questions or problems you may be having with RTBMaps.

This is the current Medical Service Study Area. California Medical Service Study Areas are created by the California Department of Health Care Access and Information (HCAI).Check the Data Dictionary for field descriptions.Search for the Medical Service Study Area data on the CHHS Open Data Portal.Checkout the California Healthcare Atlas for more Medical Service Study Area information.This is an update to the MSSA geometries and demographics to reflect the new 2020 Census tract data. The Medical Service Study Area (MSSA) polygon layer represents the best fit mapping of all new 2020 California census tract boundaries to the original 2010 census tract boundaries used in the construction of the original 2010 MSSA file. Each of the state's new 9,129 census tracts was assigned to one of the previously established medical service study areas (excluding tracts with no land area), as identified in this data layer. The MSSA Census tract data is aggregated by HCAI, to create this MSSA data layer. This represents the final re-mapping of 2020 Census tracts to the original 2010 MSSA geometries. The 2010 MSSA were based on U.S. Census 2010 data and public meetings held throughout California.Source of update: American Community Survey 5-year 2006-2010 data for poverty. For source tables refer to InfoUSA update procedural documentation. The 2010 MSSA Detail layer was developed to update fields affected by population change. The American Community Survey 5-year 2006-2010 population data pertaining to total, in households, race, ethnicity, age, and poverty was used in the update. The 2010 MSSA Census Tract Detail map layer was developed to support geographic information systems (GIS) applications, representing 2010 census tract geography that is the foundation of 2010 medical service study area (MSSA) boundaries. ***This version is the finalized MSSA reconfiguration boundaries based on the US Census Bureau 2010 Census. In 1976 Garamendi Rural Health Services Act, required the development of a geographic framework for determining which parts of the state were rural and which were urban, and for determining which parts of counties and cities had adequate health care resources and which were "medically underserved". Thus, sub-city and sub-county geographic units called "medical service study areas [MSSAs]" were developed, using combinations of census-defined geographic units, established following General Rules promulgated by a statutory commission. After each subsequent census the MSSAs were revised. In the scheduled revisions that followed the 1990 census, community meetings of stakeholders (including county officials, and representatives of hospitals and community health centers) were held in larger metropolitan areas. The meetings were designed to develop consensus as how to draw the sub-city units so as to best display health care disparities. The importance of involving stakeholders was heightened in 1992 when the United States Department of Health and Human Services' Health and Resources Administration entered a formal agreement to recognize the state-determined MSSAs as "rational service areas" for federal recognition of "health professional shortage areas" and "medically underserved areas". After the 2000 census, two innovations transformed the process, and set the stage for GIS to emerge as a major factor in health care resource planning in California. First, the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development [OSHPD], which organizes the community stakeholder meetings and provides the staff to administer the MSSAs, entered into an Enterprise GIS contract. Second, OSHPD authorized at least one community meeting to be held in each of the 58 counties, a significant number of which were wholly rural or frontier counties. For populous Los Angeles County, 11 community meetings were held. As a result, health resource data in California are collected and organized by 541 geographic units. The boundaries of these units were established by community healthcare experts, with the objective of maximizing their usefulness for needs assessment purposes. The most dramatic consequence was introducing a data simultaneously displayed in a GIS format. A two-person team, incorporating healthcare policy and GIS expertise, conducted the series of meetings, and supervised the development of the 2000-census configuration of the MSSAs.MSSA Configuration Guidelines (General Rules):- Each MSSA is composed of one or more complete census tracts.- As a general rule, MSSAs are deemed to be "rational service areas [RSAs]" for purposes of designating health professional shortage areas [HPSAs], medically underserved areas [MUAs] or medically underserved populations [MUPs].- MSSAs will not cross county lines.- To the extent practicable, all census-defined places within the MSSA are within 30 minutes travel time to the largest population center within the MSSA, except in those circumstances where meeting this criterion would require splitting a census tract.- To the extent practicable, areas that, standing alone, would meet both the definition of an MSSA and a Rural MSSA, should not be a part of an Urban MSSA.- Any Urban MSSA whose population exceeds 200,000 shall be divided into two or more Urban MSSA Subdivisions.- Urban MSSA Subdivisions should be within a population range of 75,000 to 125,000, but may not be smaller than five square miles in area. If removing any census tract on the perimeter of the Urban MSSA Subdivision would cause the area to fall below five square miles in area, then the population of the Urban MSSA may exceed 125,000. - To the extent practicable, Urban MSSA Subdivisions should reflect recognized community and neighborhood boundaries and take into account such demographic information as income level and ethnicity. Rural Definitions: A rural MSSA is an MSSA adopted by the Commission, which has a population density of less than 250 persons per square mile, and which has no census defined place within the area with a population in excess of 50,000. Only the population that is located within the MSSA is counted in determining the population of the census defined place. A frontier MSSA is a rural MSSA adopted by the Commission which has a population density of less than 11 persons per square mile. Any MSSA which is not a rural or frontier MSSA is an urban MSSA. Last updated December 6th 2024.

SCAG has developed its regional geospatial dataset of land use information at the parcel-level (approximately five million parcels) for 197 local jurisdictions in its region. The regional land use dataset is developed (1) to aid in SCAG’s regional transportation planning, scenario planning and growth forecasting, (2) facilitate policy discussion on various planning issues, and (3) enhance information database to better serve SCAG member jurisdictions, research institutes, universities, developers, general public, etc. This is SCAG's 2016 regional land use dataset developed for the Final Connect SoCal, the 2020-2045 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS), including general plan land use, specific plan land use, zoning code and existing land use. Please note this data was reviewed by local jurisdictions and reflects each jurisdiction's input received during the Connect SoCal Local Input and Envisioning Process.Note: This dataset is intended for planning purposes only, and SCAG shall incur no responsibility or liability as to the completeness, currentness, or accuracy of this information. SCAG assumes no responsibility arising from use of this information by individuals, businesses, or other public entities. The information is provided with no warranty of any kind, expressed or implied, including but not limited to the implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose. Users should consult with each local jurisdiction directly to obtain the official land use information.Data DictionaryField NameData TypeField DescriptionOBJECTIDObject IDInternal feature numberShapeGeometryType of geometrySCAGUID16Text2016 SCAG unique identification numberSCAGUID12Text2012 SCAG unique identification numberAPNTextAssessor’s parcel numberCOUNTYTextCounty nameCOUNTY_IDDoubleCounty FIPS codeCITYTextCity nameCITY_IDDoubleCity FIPS codeACRESDoubleAcreage informationYEARDoubleDataset yearCITY_GP_COText2016 Jurisdiction’s general plan land use designationSCAG_GP_COText2016 SCAG general plan land use codeDENSITYDoubleAverage density of residential/housing development (dwelling unit per acre) permitted based on jurisdiction’s general planLOWDoubleMinimum density of residential/housing development permitted (dwelling unit per acre) based on jurisdiction’s general planHIGHDoubleMaximum density of residential/housing development permitted (dwelling unit per acre) based on jurisdiction’s general planYEAR_ADOPTDateYear when jurisdiction adopted/last updated current general plan land use elementGP12_CITYText2012 jurisdiction’s general plan land use designationGP12_SCAGText2012 SCAG general plan land use codeSP_NAMETextSpecific plan nameCITY_SP_COText2016 Jurisdiction’s specific plan land use designationSCAG_SP_COText2016 SCAG specific plan land use codeDENSITY_SPDoubleAverage density of residential/housing development (dwelling unit per acre) permitted based on jurisdiction’s specific planLOW_SPDoubleMinimum density of residential/housing development permitted (dwelling unit per acre) based on jurisdiction’s specific planHIGH_SPDoubleMaximum density of residential/housing development permitted (dwelling unit per acre) based on jurisdiction’s specific planYR_AD_SPDateYear when jurisdiction adopted/last updated current specific planSP_INDEXShort IntegerSpecific plan index ('0' = outside specific plan area; '1' = inside specific plan area)CITY_ZN_COText2016 Jurisdiction’s zoning codeSCAG_ZN_COText2016 SCAG zoning codeZN12_CITYText2012 jurisdiction’s zoning codeLU16Text2016 SCAG existing land use codeLU12Text2012 SCAG existing land use codeNOTESTextAdditional informationShape_LengthDoubleLength of feature in internal unitsShape_AreaDoubleArea of feature in internal units squared2016 SCAG Land Use CodesLegendLand Use DescriptionSingle Family Residential1110 Single Family Residential1111 High Density Single Family Residential (9 or more DUs/ac)1112 Medium Density Single Family Residential (3-8 DUs/ac)1113 Low Density Single Family Residential (2 or less DUs/ac)Multi-Family Residential1120 Multi-Family Residential1121 Mixed Multi-Family Residential1122 Duplexes, Triplexes and 2- or 3-Unit Condominiums and Townhouses1123 Low-Rise Apartments, Condominiums, and Townhouses1124 Medium-Rise Apartments and Condominiums1125 High-Rise Apartments and CondominiumsMobile Homes and Trailer Parks1130 Mobile Homes and Trailer Parks1131 Trailer Parks and Mobile Home Courts, High-Density1132 Mobile Home Courts and Subdivisions, Low-DensityMixed Residential1140 Mixed Residential1100 ResidentialRural Residential1150 Rural ResidentialGeneral Office1210 General Office Use1211 Low- and Medium-Rise Major Office Use1212 High-Rise Major Office Use1213 SkyscrapersCommercial and Services1200 Commercial and Services1220 Retail Stores and Commercial Services1221 Regional Shopping Center1222 Retail Centers (Non-Strip With Contiguous Interconnected Off-Street Parking)1223 Retail Strip Development1230 Other Commercial1231 Commercial Storage1232 Commercial Recreation1233 Hotels and MotelsFacilities1240 Public Facilities1241 Government Offices1242 Police and Sheriff Stations1243 Fire Stations1244 Major Medical Health Care Facilities1245 Religious Facilities1246 Other Public Facilities1247 Public Parking Facilities1250 Special Use Facilities1251 Correctional Facilities1252 Special Care Facilities1253 Other Special Use FacilitiesEducation1260 Educational Institutions1261 Pre-Schools/Day Care Centers1262 Elementary Schools1263 Junior or Intermediate High Schools1264 Senior High Schools1265 Colleges and Universities1266 Trade Schools and Professional Training FacilitiesMilitary Installations1270 Military Installations1271 Base (Built-up Area)1272 Vacant Area1273 Air Field1274 Former Base (Built-up Area)1275 Former Base Vacant Area1276 Former Base Air FieldIndustrial1300 Industrial1310 Light Industrial1311 Manufacturing, Assembly, and Industrial Services1312 Motion Picture and Television Studio Lots1313 Packing Houses and Grain Elevators1314 Research and Development1320 Heavy Industrial1321 Manufacturing1322 Petroleum Refining and Processing1323 Open Storage1324 Major Metal Processing1325 Chemical Processing1330 Extraction1331 Mineral Extraction - Other Than Oil and Gas1332 Mineral Extraction - Oil and Gas1340 Wholesaling and WarehousingTransportation, Communications, and Utilities1400 Transportation, Communications, and Utilities1410 Transportation1411 Airports1412 Railroads1413 Freeways and Major Roads1414 Park-and-Ride Lots1415 Bus Terminals and Yards1416 Truck Terminals1417 Harbor Facilities1418 Navigation Aids1420 Communication Facilities1430 Utility Facilities1431 Electrical Power Facilities1432 Solid Waste Disposal Facilities1433 Liquid Waste Disposal Facilities1434 Water Storage Facilities1435 Natural Gas and Petroleum Facilities1436 Water Transfer Facilities1437 Improved Flood Waterways and Structures1438 Mixed Utilities1440 Maintenance Yards1441 Bus Yards1442 Rail Yards1450 Mixed Transportation1460 Mixed Transportation and UtilityMixed Commercial and Industrial1500 Mixed Commercial and IndustrialMixed Residential and Commercial1600 Mixed Residential and Commercial1610 Residential-Oriented Residential/Commercial Mixed Use1620 Commercial-Oriented Residential/Commercial Mixed UseOpen Space and Recreation1800 Open Space and Recreation1810 Golf Courses1820 Local Parks and Recreation1830 Regional Parks and Recreation1840 Cemeteries1850 Wildlife Preserves and Sanctuaries1860 Specimen Gardens and Arboreta1870 Beach Parks1880 Other Open Space and Recreation1890 Off-Street TrailsAgriculture2000 Agriculture2100 Cropland and Improved Pasture Land2110 Irrigated Cropland and Improved Pasture Land2120 Non-Irrigated Cropland and Improved Pasture Land2200 Orchards and Vineyards2300 Nurseries2400 Dairy, Intensive Livestock, and Associated Facilities2500 Poultry Operations2600 Other Agriculture2700 Horse RanchesVacant3000 Vacant3100 Vacant Undifferentiated3200 Abandoned Orchards and Vineyards3300 Vacant With Limited Improvements3400 Beaches (Vacant)1900 Urban VacantWater4000 Water4100 Water, Undifferentiated4200 Harbor Water Facilities4300 Marina Water Facilities4400 Water Within a Military Installation4500 Area of Inundation (High Water)Specific Plan7777 Specific PlanUnder Construction1700 Under ConstructionUndevelopable or Protected Land8888 Undevelopable or Protected LandUnknown9999 Unknown

This resource was created by Esri Canada Education and Research. To browse our full collection of higher-education learning resources, please visit https://hed.esri.ca/resourcefinder/.Lidar data have become an important source for detailed 3D information for cities as well as forestry, agriculture, archaeology, and many other applications. Topographic lidar surveys, which are conducted by airplane, helicopter or drone, produce data sets that contain millions or billions of points. This can create challenges for storing, visualizing and analyzing the data. In this tutorial you will learn how to create a LAS Dataset and explore the tools available in ArcGIS Pro for visualizing lidar data.To download the tutorial and data folder, click the Open button to the top right. This will download a ZIP file containing the tutorial documents and data files.Software & Solutions Used: ArcGIS Pro Advanced 3.x. Last tested with ArcGIS Pro version 3.3. Time to Complete: 30 - 60 minsFile Size: 337 MBDate Created: August 2020Last Updated: March 2024

Beginning with the discovery of a "curious valley" in 1903 by Captain Scott, the McMurdo Dry Valleys (MDV) in Antarctica have been impacted by humans, although there were only three brief visits prior to 1950. Since the late 1950's, human activity in the MDV has become commonplace in summer, putting pressure on the region's fragile ecosystems through camp construction and inhabitation, cross-valley transport on foot and via vehicles, and scientific research that involves sampling and deployment of instruments. Historical photographs, put alongside information from written documentation, offer an invaluable record of the changing patterns of human activity in the MDV. Photographic images often show the physical extent of field camps and research sites, the activities that were taking place, and the environmental protection measures that were being followed. Historical photographs of the MDV, however, are scattered in different places around the world, often in private collections, and there is a real danger that many of these photos may be lost, along with the information they contain. This project will collect and digitize historical photographs of sites of human activity in the MDV from archives and private collections in the United States, New Zealand, and organize them both chronologically and spatially in a GIS database. Sites of past human activities will be re-photographed to provide comparisons with the present, and re-photography will assist in providing spatial data for historical photographs without obvious location information. The results of this analysis will support effective environmental management into the future. The digital photo archive will be openly available through the McMurdo Dry Valleys Long Term Ecological Research (MCM LTER) website (www.mcmlter.org), where it can be used by scientists, environmental managers, and others interested in the region.

The central question of this project can be reformulated as a hypothesis: Despite an overall increase in human activities in the MDV, the spatial range of these activities has become more confined over time as a result of an increased awareness of ecosystem fragility and efforts to manage the region. To address this hypothesis, the project will define the spatial distribution and temporal frequency of human activity in the MDV. Photographs and reports will be collected from archives with polar collections such as the National Archives of New Zealand in Wellington and Christchurch and the Byrd Polar Research Center in Ohio. Private photograph collections will be accessed through personal connections, social media, advertisements in periodicals such as The Polar Times, and other means. Re-photography in the field will follow established techniques and will create benchmarks for future research projects. The spatial data will be stored in an ArcGIS database for analysis and quantification of the human footprint over time in the MDV. The improved understanding of changing patterns of human activity in the MDV provided by this historical photo archive will provide three major contributions: 1) a fundamentally important historic accounting of human activity to support current environmental management of the MDV; 2) defining the location and type of human activity will be of immediate benefit in two important ways: a) places to avoid for scientists interested in sampling pristine landscapes, and, b) targets of opportunity for scientists investigating the long-term environmental legacy of human activity; and 3) this research will make an innovative contribution to knowledge of the environmental history of the MDV.

This catalog lists the Elevation and Imagery datasets owned by Coconino County.This includes: LiDARContoursOrthoimageryTo obtain any of the datasets indexed within this dataset, please visit our fees page..For LiDAR, please fill out this form for approval by Community Development. Coconino County GIS gives no warranty, expressed or implied, as to the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of these data. This disclaimer applies both to the direct use of the data and any derivative products produced with the data. Any type of boundary, linear or point locations contained within this data or displayed within this product are approximate, and should not be used for authoritative or legal location purposes. Users should independently research, investigate, and verify all information to determine if the quality is appropriate for their intended purpose. If legally-defensible boundaries or locations are required, they should first be established by an appropriate state-registered professional. Per A.R.S. 37-178: A public agency that shares geospatial data of which it is the custodian is not liable for errors, inaccuracies or omissions and shall be held harmless from and against all damage, loss or liability arising from any use of geospatial data that is shared. The information contained in these data is dynamic and may change over time. It is the responsibility of the data user to use the data appropriately and consistent with the intent stated in the metadata.

The State of the World's Rivers is an interactive web database that illustrates data on ecological health in the world’s 50 major river basins. Indicators of ecosystem health are grouped into the categories of river fragmentation, biodiversity, and water quality. The database was created and published by International Rivers in 2014.The Dam Hotspots data contains over 5,000 dam locations determined by latitude and longitude coordinates. These locations were confined to the world’s 50 major river basins. The data set comes from multiple sources, and was corrected for location errors by International Rivers. The “project status”—a moving target—was determined by acquiring official government data, as well as through primary research from Berkeley and five International Rivers’ regional offices.* Operational: Already existing dams.* Under construction: Dams which are currently being constructed.* Planned: Dams whose studies or licensing have been completed, but construction has yet to begin.* Inventoried: Dams whose potential site has been selected, but neither studies nor licensing have occurred.* Suspended: Dams which have been temporarily or permanently suspended, deactivated, cancelled, or revoked.* Unknown: No data are currently available.

Background: Malaria continues to pose a major public health challenge in tropical regions. Despite significant efforts to control malaria in Tanzania, there are still residual transmission cases. Unfortunately, little is known about where these residual malaria transmission cases occur and how they spread. In Tanzania, for example, the transmission is heterogeneously distributed. In order to effectively control and prevent the spread of malaria, it is essential to understand the spatial distribution and transmission patterns of the disease. This study seeks to predict areas that are at high risk of malaria transmission so that intervention measures can be developed to accelerate malaria elimination efforts.

Methods: This study employs a geospatial-based model to predict and map out malaria risk area in Kilombero Valley. Environmental factors related to malaria transmission were considered and assigned valuable weights in the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), an online system using a pairwise comparison technique. The malaria hazard map was generated by a weighted overlay of the altitude, slope, curvature, aspect, rainfall distribution, and distance to streams in Geographic Information Systems (GIS). Finally, the risk map was created by overlaying components of malaria risk including hazards, elements at risk, and vulnerability. Results: The study demonstrates that the majority of the study area falls under the moderate-risk level (61%), followed by the low-risk level (31%), while the high-malaria risk area covers a small area, which occupies only 8% of the total area. Conclusion: The findings of this study are crucial for developing spatially targeted interventions against malaria transmission in residual transmission settings. Predicted areas prone to malaria risk provide information that will inform decision-makers and policymakers for proper planning, monitoring, and deployment of interventions. Methods Data acquisition and description The study employed both primary and secondary data, which were collected from numerous sources based on the input required for the implementation of the predictive model. Data collected includes the locations of all public and private health centers that were downloaded free from the health portal of the United Republic of Tanzania, Ministry of Health, Community Development, Gender, Elderly, and Children, through the universal resource locator (URL) (http://moh.go.tz/hfrportal/). Human population data was collected from the 2012 population housing census (PHC) for the United Republic of Tanzania report. Rainfall data were obtained from two local offices; Kilombero Agricultural Training and Research Institute (KATRIN) and Kilombero Valley Teak Company (KVTC). These offices collect meteorological data for agricultural purposes. Monthly data from 2012 to 2017 provided from thirteen (13) weather stations. Road and stream network shapefiles were downloaded free from the MapCruzin website via URL (https://mapcruzin.com/free-tanzania-arcgis-maps-shapefiles.htm). With respect to the size of the study area, five neighboring scenes of the Landsat 8 OLI/TIRS images (path/row: 167/65, 167/66, 167/67, 168/66 and 168/67) were downloaded freely from the United States Geological Survey (USGS) website via URL: http://earthexplorer.usgs.gov. From July to November 2017, the images were selected and downloaded from the USGS Earth Explorer archive based on the lowest amount of cloud cover coverage as viewed from the archive before downloading. Finally, the digital elevation data with a spatial resolution of three arc-seconds (90m by 90m) using WGS 84 datum and the Geographic Coordinate System were downloaded free from the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) via URL (https://dds.cr.usgs.gov/srtm/version2_1/SRTM3/Africa/). Only six tiles that fall in the study area were downloaded, coded tiles as S08E035, S09E035, S10E035, S08E036, S09E036, S10E036, S08E037, S09E037 and S10E037. Preparation and Creation of Model Factor Parameters Creation of Elevation Factor All six coded tiles were imported into the GIS environment for further analysis. Data management tools, with raster/raster data set/mosaic to new raster feature, were used to join the tiles and form an elevation map layer. Using the spatial analyst tool/reclassify feature, the generated elevation map was then classified into five classes as 109–358, 359–530, 531–747, 748–1017 and >1018 m.a.s.l. and new values were assigned for each class as 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5, respectively, with regards to the relationship with mosquito distribution and malaria risk. Finally, the elevation map based on malaria risk level is levelled as very high, high, moderate, low and very low respectively. Creation of Slope Factor A slope map was created from the generated elevation map layer, using a spatial analysis tool/surface/slope feature. Also, the slope raster layer was further reclassified into five subgroups based on predefined slope classes using standard classification schemes, namely quantiles as 0–0.58, 0.59–2.90, 2.91–6.40, 6.41–14.54 and >14.54. This classification scheme divides the range of attribute values into equal-sized sub-ranges, which allow specifying the number of the intervals while the system determines where the breaks should be. The reclassified slope raster layer subgroups were ranked 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 according to the degree of suitability for malaria incidence in the locality. To elaborate, the steeper slope values are related to lesser malaria hazards, and the gentler slopes are highly susceptible to malaria incidences. Finally, the slope map based on malaria risk level is leveled as very high, high, moderate, low and very low respectively. Creation of Curvature Factor Curvature is another topographical factor that was created from the generated elevation map using the spatial analysis tool/surface/curvature feature. The curvature raster layer was further reclassified into five subgroups based on predefined curvature class. The reclassified curvature raster layer subgroups were ranked to 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 according to their degree of suitability for malaria occurrence. To explain, this affects the acceleration and deceleration of flow across the surface. A negative value indicates that the surface is upwardly convex, and flow will be decelerated, which is related to being highly susceptible to malaria incidences. A positive profile indicates that the surface is upwardly concave and the flow will be accelerated which is related to a lesser malaria hazard, while a value of zero indicates that the surface is linear and related to a moderate malaria hazard. Lastly, the curvature map based on malaria risk level is leveled as very high, high, moderate, low, and very low respectively.
Creation of Aspect Factor As a topographic factor associated with mosquito larval habitat formation, aspect determines the amount of sunlight an area receives. The more sunlight received the stronger the influence on temperature, which may affect mosquito larval survival. The aspect of the study area also was generated from the elevation map using spatial analyst tools/ raster /surface /aspect feature. The aspect raster layer was further reclassified into five subgroups based on predefined aspect class. The reclassified aspect raster layer subgroups were ranked as 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 according to the degree of suitability for malaria incidence, and new values were re-assigned in order of malaria hazard rating. Finally, the aspect map based on malaria risk level is leveled as very high, high, moderate, low, and very low, respectively. Creation of Human Population Distribution Factor Human population data was used to generate a population distribution map related to malaria occurrence. Kilombero Valley has a total of 42 wards, the data was organized in Ms excel 2016 and imported into the GIS environment for the analysis, Inverse Distance Weighted (IDW) interpolation in the spatial analyst tool was applied to interpolate the population distribution map. The population distribution map was further reclassified into five subgroups based on potential to malaria risk. The reclassified map layer subgroups were ranked according to the vulnerability to malaria incidence in the locality such as areas having high population having the highest vulnerability and the less population having less vulnerable, and the new value was assigned as 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5, and then leveled as very high, high, moderate, low and very low malaria risk level, respectively. Creation of Proximity to Health Facilities Factor The distribution of health facilities has a significant impact on the malaria vulnerability of the population dwellings in the Kilombero Valley. The health facility layer was created by computing distance analysis using proximity multiple ring buffer features in spatial analyst tool/multiple ring buffer. Then the map layer was reclassified into five sub-layers such as within (0–5) km, (5.1–10) km, (10.1–20) km, (20.1–50) km and >50km. According to a WHO report, it is indicated that the human population who live nearby or easily accessible to health facilities is less vulnerable to malaria incidence than the ones who are very far from the health facilities due to the distance limitation for the health services. Later on, the new values were assigned as 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5, and then reclassified as very high, high, moderate, low and very low malaria risk levels, respectively. Creation of Proximity to Road Network Factor The distance to the road network is also a significant factor, as it can be used as an estimation of the access to present healthcare facilities in the area. Buffer zones were calculated on the path of the road to determine the effect of the road on malaria prevalence. The road shapefile of the study area was inputted into GIS environment and spatial analyst tools / multiple ring buffer feature were used to generate five buffer zones with the

The attraction of tourism resources is very important to promote the sustainable development of tourism industry. This study takes China’s world cultural and natural heritage as the research object, and constructs an attractiveness evaluation system for China’s world cultural and natural heritage tourism resources by collecting user feedback data from three major travel OTA platforms. At the same time, ArcGIS 10.7 software was used for spatial autocorrelation analysis and kernel density analysis to explore the spatial distribution pattern of tourism resource attraction. The results show that China’s world cultural and natural heritage can be subdivided into 5 main categories and 10 sub-categories. From the perspective of spatial aggregation, only the Moran’s I index of tourist resource points showing a significant spatial aggregation feature. This study is helpful to reveal the weaknesses of tourism resource points and provide reference for sustainable development of attraction and optimization of tourism planning and management.

This is a point data set representing river miles of the main channel of the Lower Boise River created by the City of Boise Public Works Department. The points are approximately 1/10th of a mile apart from each other for flexibility in landmark identification and model node selection (used in analysis). A river mile is a relative measure of the navigable distances in the deepest part of the channel. It is the distance in miles along a river from its mouth. River mile numbers begin at zero and increase further upstream. The data set was created by digitizing 1/10th of a mile measurements along the river channel using 2015 Idaho NAIP Imagery (1-meter resolution) at a 1:3000 scale or finer. As newer high-quality aerial imagery becomes available, a new version of the dataset will be created to reflect changes in the main channel over time and made available here. We are currently working on a 2017 version.For more information about this dataset, please contact Darcy Sharp, City of Boise Public Works Environmental Data Analyst, dsharp@cityofboise.org.Data Usage:If you download this dataset, it is highly recommended that you keep track of the year of imagery the dataset is correlated to, in this case it is 2015. As newer NAIP imagery becomes available, we will release a newer version of this dataset. It is especially important to cite the year if this dataset will be used in published documents so readers are clear on which vintage of the dataset was used in cartographic products, for analyses, etc.Data and Attribute Creation Information:The National Hydrography Dataset (NHD) is not used for this river mile layer. The NHD layer includes alternative side channels, ephemeral tributaries, and other river features that result in a high river mileage tally. NHD often uses contours to predict where the stream should be but does not connect that to actual flowing water.Features in this data set were created via heads-up digitizing. This data set is subject to errors in source data accuracy and errors introduced in the digitizing process. Source data includes: River Mile locations - 2015 Natural Color and IR 1-meter NAIP Idaho aerial imageryRiver Reach (local landmark) values - USGS (https://waterdata.usgs.gov/id/nwis/ for HUC 17050114) Site Identification numbers, IDWR Site Identification Numbers(https://research.idwr.idaho.gov/apps/Hydrologic/Accounting/ for the Boise River System), Idaho Department of Environmental Quality water quality assessments (https://cloud.insideidaho.org), and Idaho Department of Fish and Game fishing and boating access sites (https://data-idfggis.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/idfg-fishing-and-boating-access-sites)DEQ Assessment Units - assigned by referencing the DEQ Integrated Report found at https://mapcase.deq.idaho.gov/wq2014/Elevation values - grdn44w117_13 raster downloaded from the US Geological Survey digital elevation model available on The National Map at https://viewer.nationalmap.gov/basic/Latitude and Longitude values - calculated using GIS

Description for i03_DAU_county_cnty2018 is as follows:Detailed Analysis Unit-(DAU) Convergence via County Boundary cnty18_1 for Cal-Fire, (See metadata for CAL-FIRE cnty18_1), State of California.The existing DAU boundaries were aligned with cnty18_1 feature class.Originally a collaboration by Department of Water Resources, Region Office personnel, Michael L. Serna, NRO, Jason Harbaugh - NCRO, Cynthia Moffett - SCRO and Robert Fastenau - SRO with the final merge of all data into a cohesive feature class to create i03_DAU_COUNTY_cnty24k09 alignment which has been updated to create i03_DAU_COUNTY_cnty18_1.This version was derived from a preexisting “dau_v2_105, 27, i03_DAU_COUNTY_cnty24k09” Detailed Analysis Unit feature class's and aligned with Cal-Fire's 2018 boundary.Manmade structures such as piers and breakers, small islands and coastal rocks have been removed from this version. Inlets waters are listed on the coast only.These features are reachable by County\DAU. This allows the county boundaries, the DAU boundaries and the State of California Boundary to match Cal-Fire cnty18_1.DAU BackgroundThe first investigation of California's water resources began in 1873 when President Ulysses S. Grant commissioned an investigation by Colonel B. S. Alexander of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The state followed with its own study in 1878 when the State Engineer's office was created and filled by William Hammond Hall. The concept of a statewide water development project was first raised in 1919 by Lt. Robert B. Marshall of the U.S. Geological Survey.In 1931, State Engineer Edward Hyatt introduced a report identifying the facilities required and the economic means to accomplish a north-to-south water transfer. Called the "State Water Plan", the report took nine years to prepare. To implement the plan, the Legislature passed the Central Valley Act of 1933, which authorized the project. Due to lack of funds, the federal government took over the CVP as a public works project to provide jobs and its construction began in 1935.In 1945, the California Legislature authorized an investigation of statewide water resources and in 1947, the California Legislature requested that an investigation be conducted of the water resources as well as present and future water needs for all hydrologic regions in the State. Accordingly, DWR and its predecessor agencies began to collect the urban and agricultural land use and water use data that serve as the basis for the computations of current and projected water uses.The work, conducted by the Division of Water Resources (DWR’s predecessor) under the Department of Public Works, led to the publication of three important bulletins: Bulletin 1 (1951), "Water Resources of California," a collection of data on precipitation, unimpaired stream flows, flood flows and frequency, and water quality statewide; Bulletin 2 (1955), "Water Utilization and Requirements of California," estimates of water uses and forecasts of "ultimate" water needs; and Bulletin 3 (1957), "The California Water Plan," plans for full practical development of California’s water resources, both by local projects and a major State project to meet the State's ultimate needs. (See brief addendum below “The Development of Boundaries for Hydrologic Studies for the Sacramento Valley Region”)DWR subdivided California into study areas for planning purposes. The largest study areas are the ten hydrologic regions (HR), corresponding to the State’s major drainage basins. The next levels of delineation are the Planning Areas (PA), which in turn are composed of multiple detailed analysis units (DAU). The DAUs are often split by county boundaries, so are the smallest study areas used by DWR.The DAU/counties are used for estimating water demand by agricultural crops and other surfaces for water resources planning. Under current guidelines, each DAU/County has multiple crop and land-use categories. Many planning studies begin at the DAU or PA level, and the results are aggregated into hydrologic regions for presentation.Since 1950 DWR has conducted over 250 land use surveys of all or parts of California's 58 counties. Early land use surveys were recorded on paper maps of USGS 7.5' quadrangles. In 1986, DWR began to develop georeferenced digital maps of land use survey data, which are available for download. Long term goals for this program is to survey land use more frequently and efficiently using satellite imagery, high elevation digital imagery, local sources of data, and remote sensing in conjunction with field surveys.There are currently 58 counties and 278 DAUs in California.Due to some DAUs being split by county lines, the total number of DAU’s identifiable via DAU by County is 782.ADDENDUMThe Development of Boundaries for Hydrologic Studies for the Sacramento Valley Region[Detailed Analysis Units made up of a grouping of the Depletion Study Drainage Areas (DSA) boundaries occurred on the Eastern Foothills and Mountains within the Sacramento Region. Other DSA’s were divided into two or more DAU’s; for example, DSA 58 (Redding Basin) was divided into 3 DAU’s; 143,141, and 145. Mountain areas on both the east and west side of the Sacramento River below Shasta Dam went from ridge top to ridge top, or topographic highs. If available, boundaries were set adjacent to stream gages located at the low point of rivers and major creek drainages.Later, as the DAU’s were developed, some of the smaller watershed DSA boundaries in the foothill and mountain areas were grouped. The Pit River DSA was split so water use in the larger valleys (Alturas area, Big Valley, Fall River Valley, Hat Creek) could be analyzed. A change in the boundary of the Sacramento Region mountain area occurred at this time when Goose Lake near the Oregon State Line was included as part of the Sacramento Region.The Sacramento Valley Floor hydrologic boundary was at the edge of the alluvial soils and slightly modified to follow the water bearing sediments to a depth of 200 feet or more. Stream gages were located on incoming streams and used as an exception to the alluvial soil boundary. Another exception to the alluvial boundary was the inclusion of the foothills between Red Bluff and the Redding Basin. Modifications of the valley floor exterior boundary were made to facilitate analysis; some areas at the northern end of the valley followed section lines or other established boundaries.Valley floor boundaries, as originally shown in Bulletin 2, Water Utilization and Requirements of California, 1955 were based on physical topographic features such as ridges even if they only rise a few feet between basins and/or drainage areas. A few boundaries were based on drainage canals. The Joint DWR-USBR Depletion Study Drainage Areas (DSA) used drainage areas where topographic highs drained into one drainage basin. Some areas were difficult to study, particularly in areas transected by major rivers. Depletion Study Drainage Areas containing large rivers were separated into two DAU’s; one on each side of the river. This made it easier to analyze water source, water supply, and water use and drainage outflow from the DAU.Many of the DAUs that consist of natural drainage basins have stream gages located at outfall gates, which provided an accurate estimate of water leaving the unit. Detailed Analysis Units based on political boundaries or other criteria are much more difficult to analyze than those units that follow natural drainage basins.]END ADDENDUM*

The approximate geographic area of the Livable Centers Initiative during the "10 Year Update" process, published in January 2013. View the full report here. Specifically, this layer is shown in Exhibit 1, page vii, the "LCI Study Area."Executive Summary:UNLOCKING NEW OPPORTUNITIES The City of Sandy Springs intends to achieve a variety of objectives through the LCI 10-Year Update (January 2013 version). LCI refers to the Livable Centers Initiative, a program of the Atlanta Regional Commission (ARC) that assists local governments and organizations in planning efforts that are significant to the region. This plan incorporates additional material from the Sandy Springs City Center Master Plan that was unavailable when the previous version of this update was submitted in Sept. 2012. Exhibit 1 on page vii identifies the LCI study area and the City Center study area contained within it. This document (LCI Plan) places special emphasis on the City Center study area as the portion of the LCI study area best positioned for reinvestments that meet community goals. At the same time, it addresses the remainder of the LCI study area, which also offers important opportunities for reinvestment that complement the qualities of City Center and adjacent neighborhoods. A grant from the Atlanta Regional Commission (ARC) supported the joint planning process that created this update and the City Center Master Plan, which is available as a companion document. Joint objectives, described on page vi, under LCI Plan Outcomes, include: • enhancing quality of life • promoting economic development • strengthening sense of community This LCI Plan establishes a framework for public and private action that capitalizes on new demographic and market trends. The LCI Plan will equip the City to fill unmet demand for an active, pedestrian-oriented downtown area that includes expanded transportation options. The following conditions have unlocked this unparalleled level of opportunity to create civic and economic value in the study area: • Real estate market interest in walkable, mixed-use development can transform the study area over time into a district with significant new housing, job and retail options—while enhancing the City’s fiscal position. • Public interest in parks,walkable streets and cultural events that bring people together can shape private investment helping to build a welcoming place full of life and community. • The City’s interest in and ability to make infrastructure investments and to update development policies to attract and support private investment can help address the issues of mixed-use development. • The City Center can attract new high value development in ways that preserve and enhance nearby traditional residential neighb

Supplementary materials used in the following studies:Kwong, I. H. Y., Lai, D. Y. F., Wong, F. K. K., & Fung, T. (Manuscript submitted for publication). Integrating five decades of Landsat imagery for territory-wide habitat mapping and change detection in a subtropical metropolitan city.Kwong, I. H. Y. (2025). Spatio-Temporal Changes in Habitat Type and Quality in Hong Kong Using a 50-Year Archive of Remote Sensing Imagery [Doctoral thesis, Department of Geography and Resource Management, The Chinese University of Hong Kong].Kwong, I. H. Y., Lai, D. Y. F., Wong, F. K. K., & Fung, T. (2025). Spatial variations in forest succession rates revealed from multi-temporal habitat maps using Landsat imagery in subtropical Hong Kong. European Geosciences Union (EGU) General Assembly 2025, Vienna, Austria, 27 Apr–2 May 2025. https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-2667. [Poster Presentation: https://presentations.copernicus.org/EGU25/EGU25-2667_presentation-h291057.pdf]Disclaimer: All datasets described here are for reference only. No express or implied warranty or representation is given to the accuracy or completeness of the data or its appropriateness for use in any particular circumstances.GIS mapping results:All raster layers (GeoTiff format) have a pixel size of 30 m covering the 1117-km2 terrestrial area in Hong Kong in this study (Hong Kong 1980 Grid coordinate system). The time period of 1973–2022 was divided into 10 five-year periods in the mapping process.HabitatMapHK_6class_yyyy-yyyy.tif: Raster data showing the 6 habitat classes mapped in this study. Pixel values range from 1 to 6 representing woodland, shrubland, grassland, barren land, built-up area, and water respectively.HabitatMapHK_EstimatedArea.csv: Area coverage (km2) of different habitat classes, as well as their confidence intervals, as mapped in this study.HabitatMapHK_6class_ArcGISsymbology.lyrx: Used to apply the suggested symbology in ArcGIS Pro.ClassificationProbability_yyyy-yyyy.tif: The probability values belonging to each class for every pixel. They were the intermediate products generated from the classification workflow and used to determine the final class with the highest probability and compute the forest index in this study. The sum of probabilities for all six classes is equal to 1. A scale factor of 10000 was applied to the GeoTiff files for storage convenience.HabitatMapHK_8class_yyyy-yyyy.tif: Based on the 6-class outputs, two more classes are added in this product, including wetland (pixel value 7) and plantation (pixel value 8), to serve as inputs for the habitat quality model.HabitatQualityHK_yyyy-yyyy.tif: Habitat quality maps produced in this study. The pixel value is a continuous variable ranging from 0 to 1, with 1 meaning the highest habitat quality.GIS supplementary data:All datasets were collected and compiled from January to June 2024 and represent the conditions at that time.Environmental Raster:DistanceFromCoast.tif: Geometric distance (m) from the coastline.Elevation.tif: Terrain height (m) from a LiDAR-based digital terrain model.Hillfire_10periods.tif: Hill fires occurred in each five-year period, based on burn-area products by Chan et al. (2023) and manual digitisation for early years.Insolation.tif: Annual amount of incoming solar radiation (kWh/m2) computed using SAGA GIS.Landslide_10periods.tif: Landslides occurred in each five-year period, based on the Enhanced Natural Terrain Landslide Inventory (Dias et al., 2009).Northness.tif: Terrain aspect from 1 (due north) to -1 (due south) computed from the DTM.Precipitation.tif: Annual precipitation (mm) (average between 1991-2020) from Hong Kong Observatory.Slope.tif: Steepness (°) of the ground surface computed from the DTM.SoilCEC.tif: Cation exchange capacity (CEC) (mmol/kg) of topsoil from Luo et al. (2007).SoilOrganicMatter.tif: Organic matter content (%) of topsoil from Luo et al. (2007).Temperature.tif: Annual mean temperature (°C) from Morgan and Guénard (2019).TopographicWetnessIndex.tif: Amount of water accumulation due to topographic effects computed using SAGA GIS.Typhoon_10periods.tif: Wind speed (km/h) estimated from WindNinja based on maximum hourly mean wind records associated with typhoon events in each five-year period.WindSpeed.tif: Mean wind speed (km/h) estimated from WindNinja based on monthly prevailing wind records.Human Activities:BuiltupAreas_10periods_shp.zip: Shapefile (polygons) of built-up areas, with attributes on the years of construction (estimated from topographic maps) and density (high and low). It was used as a threat factor in habitat quality mapping and variables in habitat changes.CountryParksProtectedAreas_shp.zip: Shapefile (polygons) of protected areas (Country Parks, Special Areas, etc.), with attributes on the years of designation and revision. It was used as a protection factor in habitat quality mapping and variables in habitat changes.PollutionSource_shp.zip: Shapefile (polygons) of pollution sources (landfills, power stations, and incineration plants), with attributes on the years of construction and closure. It was used as a threat factor in habitat quality mapping.Roads_10periods_shp.zip: Shapefile (polylines) of roads, with attributes on the years of construction (estimated from topographic maps) and type (main and secondary). It was used as a threat factor in habitat quality mapping.Mapping Reference:ForestIndex_FieldCollectedReferenceData.csv: Field survey records of habitat types which were used to evaluate the forest index variable in this study.HabitatMapHK_FieldCollectedReferenceData.csv: Field survey records of habitat types which were used to assess the habitat mapping results in this study.HabitatMapHK_OfficeInterpretedReferenceData.csv: Reference points where the habitat class in each period was determined through visual interpretation of the aerial photographs and other historical records. The points were used for both training and validation of the habitat maps in this study.HabitatQualityHK_FieldSurveyedEcologicalValue2008.csv: Field survey records of ecological values in 2008 which were used to evaluate the habitat quality maps in this study.LandsatHK_CrossSensorCalibrationPoints.csv: Selected points that were assumed to remain unchanged over time and used to cross-calibrate different Landsat sensors in this study.LandsatHK_ImageMetadata.csv: Metadata of the Landsat imagery (1,100 downloaded scenes and 607 valid scenes after pre-processing) acquired and processed in this study.Plantation_1975_1990_2008_2019.tif: Pixels that were identified as plantations on four existing maps in different years (1975, 1990, 2008, 2019), as represented by the four layers contained in this raster file respectively. These pixels were used to help extract plantation class on the habitat map (when producing habitat quality) and denote areas with plantation activities (when modelling habitat changes) in this study.SpeciesObsHK_SpeciesChecklist.csv: A species checklist of 7 taxa in Hong Kong (Plants, Butterflies, Birds, Reptiles, Dragonflies, Amphibians, Mammals) compiled from AFCD, Hong Kong Biodiversity Information Hub, and other secondary sources. Species of conservation concern are identified based on local assessments (Corlett et al., 2000; Fellowes et al., 2002), environmental protection laws, and national and global assessments. The checklist was used to match with the iNaturalist observation data to compute biodiversity metrics at grid levels and evaluate habitat quality maps in this study.SpeciesObsHK_SynonymList.csv: A list of species name synonyms for matching names used in iNaturalist and other secondary sources with the species checklist. It was used to pre-process the iNaturalist observation data and unify the species names from different records in this study.Analysis scripts:Part 1: Mapping Vegetation Habitats from a Satellite Image Time-SeriesP1_01_SearchAndDownloadFromGEE.ipynb: Query and download all available Landsat 1-9 imagery covering the study area using Google Earth Engine. Atmospheric correction is performed if necessary.P1_02_Preprocess_part1.py: Some basic pre-processing steps after downloading the images from cloud platform to local computer, such as mosaicking adjacent scenes and reprojecting to local coordinate system.P1_03_TopographicCorrection.R: SCS+C topographic correction based on terrain slope, aspect, sun azimuth and sun elevation angles.P1_04_CrossSensorCal.R: Cross-calibration of different Landsat sensors based on pseudo-invariant features, followed by computing variables for image classification.P1_05_ImageComposite.R: Create image composites (median and standard deviation statistics) by combining all imagery acquired in the same period.P1_06_ExtractPixelValue.R: Extract pixel values at the locations of reference points.P1_07_TrainingDataStat.R: Summarise the characteristics of pixel values (e.g., spectral reflectance) of each habitat class and Landsat sensor.P1_08_TrainRFModel.R: Train the Random Forest model, fuse probability outputs from each image, evaluate the model accuracies with cross-validation, and create the final model for classifying the entire dataset.P1_09_TestProcedures.R: Modify the classification procedures and re-run the Random Forest models to evaluate their impacts on the classification accuracies.P1_10_ApplyModel.R: Apply the Random Forest model and fusion steps to all images to create the habitat map for each period.P1_11_AreaCoverage.R: Obtain the area coverage of each class on the habitat map as well as the confidence interval of the area estimates.P1_12_CompareFieldData.R: Assess the accuracies of the habitat maps by overlaying with field-collected points and LiDAR height information at different times.P1_13_SurvivalAnalysis.R: Analyse the number of years required for transitioning between vegetation classes as well as the correlations between transition times and environmental variables.Part 2: Computing Habitat Quality Maps with Reference to

Polygons of building footprints in Coconino County. Coconino County GIS gives no warranty, expressed or implied, as to the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of these data. This disclaimer applies both to the direct use of the data and any derivative products produced with the data. Any type of boundary, linear or point locations contained within this data or displayed within this product are approximate, and should not be used for authoritative or legal location purposes. Users should independently research, investigate, and verify all information to determine if the quality is appropriate for their intended purpose. If legally-defensible boundaries or locations are required, they should first be established by an appropriate state-registered professional. Per A.R.S. 37-178: A public agency that shares geospatial data of which it is the custodian is not liable for errors, inaccuracies or omissions and shall be held harmless from and against all damage, loss or liability arising from any use of geospatial data that is shared. The information contained in these data is dynamic and may change over time. It is the responsibility of the data user to use the data appropriately and consistent with the intent stated in the metadata.

Coconino County GIS gives no warranty, expressed or implied, as to the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of these data. This disclaimer applies both to the direct use of the data and any derivative products produced with the data. Any type of boundary, linear or point locations contained within this data or displayed within this product are approximate, and should not be used for authoritative or legal location purposes. Users should independently research, investigate, and verify all information to determine if the quality is appropriate for their intended purpose. If legally-defensible boundaries or locations are required, they should first be established by an appropriate state-registered professional. Per A.R.S. 37-178: A public agency that shares geospatial data of which it is the custodian is not liable for errors, inaccuracies or omissions and shall be held harmless from and against all damage, loss or liability arising from any use of geospatial data that is shared. The information contained in these data is dynamic and may change over time. It is the responsibility of the data user to use the data appropriately and consistent with the intent stated in the metadata.

Map that displays Supervisor District 4 boundary within Coconino CountyCoconino County GIS gives no warranty, expressed or implied, as to the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of these data. This disclaimer applies both to the direct use of the data and any derivative products produced with the data. Any type of boundary, linear or point locations contained within this data or displayed within this product are approximate, and should not be used for authoritative or legal location purposes. Users should independently research, investigate, and verify all information to determine if the quality is appropriate for their intended purpose. If legally-defensible boundaries or locations are required, they should first be established by an appropriate state-registered professional. Per A.R.S. 37-178: A public agency that shares geospatial data of which it is the custodian is not liable for errors, inaccuracies or omissions and shall be held harmless from and against all damage, loss or liability arising from any use of geospatial data that is shared. The information contained in these data is dynamic and may change over time. It is the responsibility of the data user to use the data appropriately and consistent with the intent stated in the metadata.

The attraction of tourism resources is very important to promote the sustainable development of tourism industry. This study takes China’s world cultural and natural heritage as the research object, and constructs an attractiveness evaluation system for China’s world cultural and natural heritage tourism resources by collecting user feedback data from three major travel OTA platforms. At the same time, ArcGIS 10.7 software was used for spatial autocorrelation analysis and kernel density analysis to explore the spatial distribution pattern of tourism resource attraction. The results show that China’s world cultural and natural heritage can be subdivided into 5 main categories and 10 sub-categories. From the perspective of spatial aggregation, only the Moran’s I index of tourist resource points showing a significant spatial aggregation feature. This study is helpful to reveal the weaknesses of tourism resource points and provide reference for sustainable development of attraction and optimization of tourism planning and management.

Detailed maps are important components of fluvial-geomorphological research, connecting several tools, namely field mapping of presented channel and floodplain forms and the assessment of fluvial processes and hydromorphological conditions of current river management. In this paper, we propose a universal map legend for the complex mapping of small stream channels in a detailed scale, which means including both the channel and adjacent floodplain segments. With the help of the symbology we are able to demonstrate both fluvial forms (i.e. individual features, grain size of bed sediments and fluvial deposits) and fluvial processes (i.e. contemporary trends in channels, character of lateral sediment inputs and flow characteristics) in a single map. In total, nearly 150 symbols were proposed and created as a combination of TrueType font and ArcGIS Style files. However, the principle can be used in various software. The work is accompanied by three map examples from the Nízký Jeseník Mts (the Stará Voda Stream) and the Moravskoslezské Beskydy Mts (the Lubina and Bystrý Streams).

Overview:This document describes the 2021 accessibility data released by the Accessibility Observatory at the University of Minnesota. The data are included in the National Accessibility Evaluation Project for 2021, and this information can be accessed for each state in the U.S. at https://access.umn.edu/research/america. The following sections describe the format, naming, and content of the data files.Data Formats: The data files are provided in a Geopackage format. Geopackage (.gpkg) files are an open-source, geospatial filetype that can contain multiple layers of data in a single file, and can be opened with most GIS software, including both ArcGIS and QGIS.Within this zipfile, there are six geopackage files (.gpkg) structured as follows. Each of them contains the blocks shapes layer, results at the block level for all LEHD variables (jobs and workers), with a layer of results for each travel time (5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60 minutes). {MPO ID}_tr_2021_0700-0859-avg.gpkg = Average Transit Access Departing Every Minute 7am-9am{MPO ID}_au_2021_08.gpkg = Average Auto Access Departing 8am{MPO ID}_bi_2021_1200_lts1.gpkg = Average Bike Access on LTS1 Network{MPO ID}_bi_2021_1200_lts2.gpkg = Average Bike Access on LTS2 Network{MPO ID}_bi_2021_1200_lts3.gpkg = Average Bike Access on LTS3 Network{MPO ID}_bi_2021_1200_lts4.gpkg = Average Bike Access on LTS4 NetworkFor mapping and geospatial analysis, the blocks shape layer within each geopackage can be joined to the blockid of the access attribute data. Opening and Using Geopackages in ArcGIS:Unzip the zip archiveUse the "Add Data" function in Arc to select the .gpkg fileSelect which layer(s) are needed — always select "main.blocks" as this layer contains the Census block shapes; select any other attribute data layers as well.There are three types of layers in the geopackage file — the "main.blocks" layer is the spatial features layer, and all other layers are either numerical attribute data tables, or the "fieldname_descriptions" metadata layer. The numerical attribute layers are named with the following format:[mode]_[threshold]_minutes[mode] is a two-character code indicating the transport mode used[threshold] is an integer indicating the travel time threshold used for this data layerTo use the data spatially, perform a join between the "main.blocks" layer and the desired numerical data layer, using either the numerical "id" fields, or 15-digit "blockid" fields as join fields.

This layer was developed by the Research & Analytics Group at the Atlanta Regional Commission to show major Roads in Atlanta Region and State Highways in Georgia.These layers are subsets of the Georgia Department of Transportation's (GDOT) DLGF street centerline database. The features included in this Layer consist of all State highways in the 29-county area, as well as a number of additional roads that were identified by ARC's Transportation Planning Division (TPD) as major roads. Please note, this Layer is intended for relatively small scale mapping and labeling, and should be used in conjunction with the Expressways Layer.Major roads date: 2004State Highways date: 2003