100+ datasets found
  1. Federal Justice Statistics Program: Paired-Agency Linked Files, 1994-2022

    • icpsr.umich.edu
    Updated May 28, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    United States. Bureau of Justice Statistics (2024). Federal Justice Statistics Program: Paired-Agency Linked Files, 1994-2022 [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30701.v13
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    May 28, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Researchhttps://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/pages/
    Authors
    United States. Bureau of Justice Statistics
    License

    https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/studies/30701/termshttps://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/studies/30701/terms

    Time period covered
    Oct 1, 1994 - Sep 30, 2022
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    The new FJSRC linking system, implemented with the 2008 FJSRC data, includes sets of agency dyad linked files created by improved methods of algorithmic matching. There are both inter-agency linked files and intra-agency dyad linked files. The inter-agency matched pair files (or "dyads") permit the linking of records from two different source agencies for adjacent stages of federal case processing by providing a crosswalk of the agency-specific key ID variables for the two agency data files in the pair. These agency ID variables (sequential ID numbers) may be used to link records from one agency's standard analysis file (SAF) to the next. The system enables users to track individual defendant-cases through stages of the federal criminal justice system (from arrest to prosecution, adjudication, sentencing, and corrections) sequentially, one agency dyad pair at a time. Each inter-agency paired linked file relates the sequential record numbers (i.e. SEQ_NUM) included in the SAFs from one agency/stage to another. The intra-agency matched pair files (also dyads) permit the same type of linking as described above except that the linkages are within the same federal agency. The linkages are to different stages of case processing withing a particular agency. The system covers all data years from 1994-2022. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, D.C.) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute through 2012. Data from 2013 and on were prepared by Abt Associates.

  2. D

    Government Open Data Management Platform Market Report | Global Forecast...

    • dataintelo.com
    csv, pdf, pptx
    Updated Jan 7, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Dataintelo (2025). Government Open Data Management Platform Market Report | Global Forecast From 2025 To 2033 [Dataset]. https://dataintelo.com/report/global-government-open-data-management-platform-market
    Explore at:
    pdf, pptx, csvAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jan 7, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Dataintelo
    License

    https://dataintelo.com/privacy-and-policyhttps://dataintelo.com/privacy-and-policy

    Time period covered
    2024 - 2032
    Area covered
    Global
    Description

    Government Open Data Management Platform Market Outlook



    The global government open data management platform market size was valued at USD 2.5 billion in 2023 and is projected to reach USD 6.7 billion by 2032, growing at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 11.5% during the forecast period. The rising emphasis on transparency, accountability, and citizen engagement by governments worldwide is a significant driving factor for this market's growth.



    The proliferation of digital governance initiatives is one of the primary growth factors for the government open data management platform market. Governments across the globe are increasingly adopting digital platforms to improve public service delivery, enhance citizen engagement, and increase operational efficiency. By providing open access to data, these platforms enable better decision-making and foster innovation among various stakeholders, including businesses, researchers, and the general public. This trend is further accelerated by the growing demand for data-driven governance and public policies that are more responsive and accountable.



    Moreover, advancements in data analytics and artificial intelligence (AI) are significantly contributing to the growth of the government open data management platform market. Modern open data platforms are increasingly incorporating sophisticated analytics tools and AI capabilities to offer more insightful and actionable data. These technological advancements enable governments to leverage large datasets for predictive analytics, enhancing their ability to anticipate and respond to public needs effectively. Additionally, the integration of AI in data management platforms helps in automating data processing tasks, thereby improving efficiency and reducing operational costs.



    The increasing focus on smart city initiatives is another critical factor driving the demand for government open data management platforms. Smart cities rely heavily on data to optimize urban planning, improve traffic management, enhance public safety, and provide efficient public services. Open data platforms play a crucial role in these initiatives by providing a centralized repository for diverse data sets collected from various sensors and systems across the city. This data can be accessed and analyzed by different stakeholders to develop innovative solutions that address urban challenges and improve the quality of life for citizens.



    Government Software plays a pivotal role in the development and implementation of open data management platforms. These software solutions are designed to meet the specific needs of government agencies, providing robust tools for data collection, analysis, and dissemination. By leveraging government software, agencies can ensure data accuracy, enhance transparency, and improve public service delivery. The integration of advanced features such as data visualization, predictive analytics, and machine learning within government software allows for more informed decision-making and policy formulation. As governments continue to prioritize digital transformation, the demand for specialized government software solutions is expected to rise, driving further growth in the open data management platform market.



    From a regional perspective, North America holds a significant share of the government open data management platform market, driven by the early adoption of digital governance solutions and the presence of major technology providers in the region. Europe is also a prominent market, with several countries implementing open data policies to promote transparency and citizen participation. The Asia Pacific region is expected to witness substantial growth during the forecast period, supported by increasing government initiatives to digitize public services and the rising adoption of smart city projects. Latin America, the Middle East, and Africa are also anticipated to show promising growth, although at a comparatively slower pace due to varying levels of technological infrastructure and government investment in these regions.



    Component Analysis



    The government open data management platform market is segmented by component into software and services. Software components include the core data management platforms, which facilitate the collection, storage, and dissemination of open data. These software solutions are designed to handle large volumes of data and provide various functionalities such as data analytics, visualization, and integration. The increasi

  3. c

    The global Government Open Data Management Platform Market size is USD XX...

    • cognitivemarketresearch.com
    pdf,excel,csv,ppt
    Updated Sep 8, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Cognitive Market Research (2024). The global Government Open Data Management Platform Market size is USD XX million in 2024. [Dataset]. https://www.cognitivemarketresearch.com/government-open-data-management-platform-market-report
    Explore at:
    pdf,excel,csv,pptAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Sep 8, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Cognitive Market Research
    License

    https://www.cognitivemarketresearch.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.cognitivemarketresearch.com/privacy-policy

    Time period covered
    2021 - 2033
    Area covered
    Global
    Description

    According to Cognitive Market Research, the global Government Open Data Management Platform Market size will be USD XX million in 2024. It will expand at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 9.90% from 2024 to 2031.

    North America held the major market share for more than 40% of the global revenue with a market size of USD XX million in 2024 and will grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 8.1% from 2024 to 2031.
    Europe accounted for a market share of over 30% of the global revenue with a market size of USD XX million.
    Asia Pacific held a market share of around 23% of the global revenue with a market size of USD XX million in 2024 and will grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 11.9% from 2024 to 2031.
    Latin America had a market share of more than 5% of the global revenue with a market size of USD XX million in 2024 and will grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 9.3% from 2024 to 2031.
    Middle East and Africa had a market share of around 2% of the global revenue and was estimated at a market size of USD XX million in 2024 and will grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 9.6% from 2024 to 2031.
    The large enterprises held the highest Government Open Data Management Platform Market revenue share in 2024.
    

    Market Dynamics of Government Open Data Management Platform Market

    Key Drivers for Government Open Data Management Platform Market

    Streamlining Procedures and Increasing Productivity to Increase the Demand Globally

    Operational effectiveness and process optimization are propelling market expansion. Organizations can increase operational efficiency and streamline procedures by implementing open data management solutions. Organizational data is gathered, managed, organized, and stored with the use of open data management platforms to increase accessibility and usability. These kinds of solutions are commonly applied to business process automation as well as operational optimization and streamlining. For instance, by significantly reducing human engagement and contact during the data extraction procedures, open data management platforms are often used to automate corporate processes. In response to advancements in technology and the creation of increasingly complicated data sets, open data management platforms have developed.

    Advancements in Technology to Propel Market Growth

    The Government Open Data Management Platform Market has witnessed steady growth, driven by advancements in technology, such as improving analytics, security, and data accessibility. Governments can more effectively manage and use huge volumes of public data because of advances in AI, cloud computing, and big data analytics. By enhancing the integration of data, real-time analysis, and visualization, these technologies promote availability and well-informed decision-making. Furthermore, improvements in cybersecurity guarantee data security, encouraging public confidence. The need for advanced data management platforms in the public sector is being driven by the increasing capacity to handle and exploit open data as a result of technological advancements.

    Restraint Factor for the Government Open Data Management Platform Market

    Lack of Skilled Workforce in Government Open Data Management Platform to Limit the Sales

    The government's open data management platform needs skilled workers to oversee its operations, but a key hindrance to its expansion is the need for a skilled workforce. Understanding HTML, CSS, and JavaScript is necessary for the developer to execute data platform management. Thus, lacking in this fundamental knowledge makes it more difficult to hire the proper specialists, which lowers productivity inside the firm. These important problems make it harder for the market for government open data platform management to expand.

    Impact of Covid-19 on the Government Open Data Management Platform Market

    The Government Open Data Management Platform Market has witnessed growth. In order for researchers and policymakers to follow the virus's transmission, locate hotspots, and make defensible decisions, open data management technologies were essential in the collection, analysis, and visualization of COVID-19 data. Consequently, the outbreak had a favorable effect on the expansion of the local market. The need for improved data security, the growing focus on data-driven decision-making, the need for transparent and accessible government data, changing...

  4. National Data Guardian feedback on 'Data: a new direction': proposed...

    • gov.uk
    • s3.amazonaws.com
    Updated Nov 22, 2021
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    National Data Guardian (2021). National Data Guardian feedback on 'Data: a new direction': proposed government reforms to the UK data protection regime [Dataset]. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-data-guardian-feedback-on-data-a-new-direction-proposed-government-reforms-to-the-uk-data-protection-regime
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 22, 2021
    Dataset provided by
    GOV.UKhttp://gov.uk/
    Authors
    National Data Guardian
    Area covered
    United Kingdom
    Description

    This is the National Data Guardian’s (NDG’s) formal response to the Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport’s consultation Data: a new direction on the proposed reforms to data protection law in the UK.

    This is not an exhaustive review of all the government’s proposals, but rather the NDG’s considerations and recommendations on those areas of the reforms that may impact the health and social care sector.

    The appropriate use of data is essential to ensure continuous improvements in health and social care. The NDG is supportive of the government’s aim of building an improved data protection regime. As such, this response is intended to provide advice and feedback on areas of the consultation where the NDG believes further consideration might be necessary if the government is to achieve its stated aim.

  5. Health visitor service delivery metrics experimental statistics: 2019 to...

    • gov.uk
    • s3.amazonaws.com
    Updated Aug 2, 2022
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Public Health England (2022). Health visitor service delivery metrics experimental statistics: 2019 to 2020 annual data [Dataset]. https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/health-visitor-service-delivery-metrics-experimental-statistics-2019-to-2020-annual-data
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Aug 2, 2022
    Dataset provided by
    GOV.UKhttp://gov.uk/
    Authors
    Public Health England
    Description

    This release is for quarters 1 to 4 of 2019 to 2020.

    Local authority commissioners and health professionals can use these resources to track how many pregnant women, children and families in their local area have received health promoting reviews at particular points during pregnancy and childhood.

    The data and commentaries also show variation at a local, regional and national level. This can help with planning, commissioning and improving local services.

    The metrics cover health reviews for pregnant women, children and their families at several stages which are:

    • antenatal contact
    • new birth visit
    • 6 to 8-week review
    • 12-month review
    • 2 to 2-and-a-half-year review

    Public Health England (PHE) collects the data, which is submitted by local authorities on a voluntary basis.

    See health visitor service delivery metrics in the child and maternal health statistics collection to access data for previous years.

    Find guidance on using these statistics and other intelligence resources to help you make decisions about the planning and provision of child and maternal health services.

    See health visitor service metrics and outcomes definitions from Community Services Dataset (CSDS).

    Correction notice

    Since publication in November 2020, Lewisham and Leicestershire councils have identified errors in the new birth visits within 14 days data it submitted to Public Health England (PHE) for 2019 to 2020 data. This error has caused a statistically significant change in the health visiting data for 2019 to 2020, and so the Office for Health Improvement and Disparities (OHID) has updated and reissued the data in OHID’s Fingertips tool.

    A correction notice has been added to the 2019 to 2020 annual statistical release and statistical commentary but the data has not been altered.

    Please consult OHID’s Fingertips tool for corrected data for Lewisham and Leicestershire, the London and East Midlands region, and England.

  6. D

    Government Cloud Market Report | Global Forecast From 2025 To 2033

    • dataintelo.com
    csv, pdf, pptx
    Updated Dec 3, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Dataintelo (2024). Government Cloud Market Report | Global Forecast From 2025 To 2033 [Dataset]. https://dataintelo.com/report/government-cloud-market
    Explore at:
    csv, pdf, pptxAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Dec 3, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Dataintelo
    License

    https://dataintelo.com/privacy-and-policyhttps://dataintelo.com/privacy-and-policy

    Time period covered
    2024 - 2032
    Area covered
    Global
    Description

    Government Cloud Market Outlook



    The global Government Cloud market size was valued at approximately USD 26 billion in 2023 and is projected to reach around USD 78 billion by 2032, exhibiting a robust compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 12.8% during the forecast period. The growth of this market is primarily driven by the increasing demand for cost-efficient and flexible IT solutions, combined with the rising need for enhanced data security and compliance with government regulations. As governments across the globe are increasingly focusing on digital transformation, the adoption of cloud services has become essential for enhancing operational efficiency and enabling better citizen services.



    The growth of the Government Cloud market is significantly influenced by the need for regulatory compliance and data security. Governments around the world are under constant pressure to maintain data sovereignty and ensure that sensitive information is stored and managed securely. Cloud solutions offer advanced security features, including data encryption, identity and access management, and threat protection, which are critical for safeguarding governmental data. Moreover, the increasing occurrence of cyber threats and data breaches necessitates the adoption of secure cloud services, driving the market further. Additionally, the COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the shift towards digitalization, compelling governments to adopt cloud technologies to maintain business continuity and provide uninterrupted public services.



    The demand for scalability and flexibility is another crucial growth factor for the Government Cloud market. Cloud solutions offer the ability to easily scale IT resources, allowing government agencies to respond quickly to changing demands and manage workloads efficiently. This flexibility is particularly important for handling large volumes of data and providing seamless public services. Furthermore, cloud computing enables the integration of advanced technologies, such as artificial intelligence and machine learning, into government operations, fostering innovation and improving decision-making processes. As governments strive to enhance their service delivery and optimize resource utilization, the adoption of cloud solutions is expected to rise.



    Cost efficiency is also a major driver of the Government Cloud market. Traditional IT infrastructure involves significant capital expenditures and ongoing maintenance costs, which can be a financial burden for government agencies. Cloud services offer a more cost-effective alternative by allowing governments to pay only for the resources they use, thus reducing upfront investments and operational expenses. Additionally, cloud solutions eliminate the need for physical hardware and infrastructure, further lowering costs. This economic advantage is particularly appealing to governments facing budget constraints and seeking to maximize the value of public funds.



    Solution Analysis



    The Government Cloud market is segmented by solution into Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS), Platform as a Service (PaaS), and Software as a Service (SaaS). Each of these solutions offers distinct advantages that cater to the specific needs of government agencies. IaaS provides a virtualized computing infrastructure over the internet, allowing governments to access and manage computing resources without the burden of maintaining physical hardware. This solution is particularly beneficial for agencies looking to quickly scale their IT resources and reduce capital expenditures. It also offers high levels of customization, making it suitable for a wide range of applications within the public sector.



    Platform as a Service (PaaS) is another critical component of the Government Cloud market. PaaS offers a platform that allows government agencies to develop, run, and manage applications without the complexity of building and maintaining the underlying infrastructure. This solution is ideal for fostering innovation and accelerating the development of new applications and services. By providing pre-built software components and tools, PaaS enables agencies to streamline their development processes, reduce time-to-market, and focus on delivering value-added services to citizens. Moreover, PaaS supports the integration of cutting-edge technologies, such as AI and IoT, enhancing the capabilities of government applications.



    Software as a Service (SaaS) is a pivotal solution in the Government Cloud market, offering ready-to-use applications that can be accessed over the internet. SaaS eliminates the need for local installation and maintenance, allowing go

  7. G

    Government Open Data Management (ODM) Platform Report

    • datainsightsmarket.com
    doc, pdf, ppt
    Updated May 4, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Data Insights Market (2025). Government Open Data Management (ODM) Platform Report [Dataset]. https://www.datainsightsmarket.com/reports/government-open-data-management-odm-platform-526814
    Explore at:
    pdf, doc, pptAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 4, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Data Insights Market
    License

    https://www.datainsightsmarket.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.datainsightsmarket.com/privacy-policy

    Time period covered
    2025 - 2033
    Area covered
    Global
    Variables measured
    Market Size
    Description

    The Government Open Data Management (ODM) Platform market is experiencing robust growth, driven by increasing government initiatives promoting transparency, accountability, and citizen engagement. The market's expansion is fueled by the rising need for efficient data management, analysis, and dissemination across various sectors like healthcare, transportation, and public safety. Cloud-based solutions are gaining significant traction due to their scalability, cost-effectiveness, and accessibility. The integration of advanced analytics and AI capabilities within ODM platforms is further enhancing their value proposition, enabling governments to derive actionable insights from open data for better policy-making and improved public services. While North America currently holds a significant market share due to early adoption and established technology infrastructure, regions like Asia Pacific are witnessing rapid growth driven by increasing digitalization and government investments in open data initiatives. The market is segmented by application (IT & Cybersecurity, Aerospace & Defense, Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals, Energy & Utilities, Logistics & Transportation, and Others) and by type (Cloud-Based and On-Premises). Competition is relatively high, with established players like Socrata and CKAN facing competition from emerging solution providers offering innovative functionalities. However, data security and privacy concerns, along with the complexities of data integration and standardization, pose challenges to market growth. The forecast period (2025-2033) anticipates sustained growth, particularly in developing economies where the potential for utilizing open data for societal improvement is immense. Factors like increasing cybersecurity threats and the need for robust data governance frameworks will shape the market landscape. The increasing adoption of open data standards and interoperability solutions will be crucial for driving wider adoption and maximizing the benefits of government open data initiatives. Specific application segments, such as healthcare and transportation, are poised for significant growth due to the potential for improved public health outcomes and optimized transportation management through data-driven insights. Strategic partnerships between government agencies and technology providers will be critical in accelerating market penetration and ensuring the successful implementation of ODM platforms. A conservative estimation of CAGR (considering a global market size around $2 billion in 2025) suggests an impressive expansion over the forecast period.

  8. w

    Data from: Building a Community-based Data Network for Geothermal Energy

    • data.wu.ac.at
    pdf
    Updated Dec 5, 2017
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2017). Building a Community-based Data Network for Geothermal Energy [Dataset]. https://data.wu.ac.at/schema/geothermaldata_org/MDMzZTUxNDQtZDQxZS00NjkxLWE4NTMtODNmNGM2ZTZkMjQz
    Explore at:
    pdfAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Dec 5, 2017
    Area covered
    fc79960b226c9b9b5279fda5ac037c5e31d9d087
    Description

    In this paper, we address the issues associated with the development and sustainability of a network of data sites and databases hosted by academic-based groups. These are the groups who, over the years, have conducted the majority of research on geothermal systems while educating the next generation of geothermal professionals and researchers. A network can be envisioned as an Internet-connected series of nodes (data sites), that allow for a common approach to finding data among the linked sites. Each of the co-authors' groups have for years collected and provided data to researchers, industry, state and federal agencies, and the public. Over the last ten years, the better management of and access to data have become an increasingly important part of not only the research process, but also for industry as they push forward with delineating and producing geothermal resources, for state and federal agencies to help them meet their missions and mandates, and to inform the public on the importance of geothermal energy. Indeed both Congress and the White House continue to strengthen the bipartisan goal of free and open access to all data created by the federal dollar. For academic-based data sites, the challenges are many, but not insurmountable. For example, we need to provide seamless linkages of data to analysis and visualization tools, in particular high-level modeling programs and required computational resources. When dealing with research results and industry partnerships, moratorium and proprietary data must be handled carefully and securely. At the same time, we have to make it as easy as possible for users to discover, aggregate and synthesize data in ways that allow them to focus on the analysis of these data rather than on finding and compiling them. We also must better utilize these research-level data within the education enterprise to train and attract our next generation of geoscientists and geoengineers. Data discovery and sharing among multiple data sites is a persistent issue. Each of the sites in the network hosts some unique data but a substantial number of data types may overlap among some of the sites, complicating the process. The notion of the "semantic web" as the solution for data integration has sparked continued debate because of its underlying requirement for ontologies and single-definition vocabularies. A hybrid approach is now evolving that utilizes some tools of the semantic web but recognizes the investment in current data sites and the different needs of the various user communities. This approach also recognizes that much "knowledge" (the ultimate value of a data network) is wrapped up in differences among vocabularies, languages and concepts and that forcing singularity decreases the knowledge value of data and their resulting data products. This approach makes data sharing more difficult, but not impossible, and importantly opens up the system for broader participation and collaboration. Sustainability will always remain an issue for an academic-based data network. Self-funding from the home institution is not feasible. However as agencies continue to increase their efforts to manage and provide access to data generated by projects and activities they fund, a long-term agency-academic partnership will evolve that includes both funding academic-based data networks and relying on these networks to provide some of that public access to federally-funded data. Finally, it is important to note that these academic-based data networks have to be self-governing for them to work at all, much less be sustainabl

  9. Medical Terminology Software Market Analysis, Size, and Forecast 2025-2029:...

    • technavio.com
    pdf
    Updated Apr 25, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Technavio (2025). Medical Terminology Software Market Analysis, Size, and Forecast 2025-2029: North America (US, Canada, and Mexico), Europe (France, Germany, Italy, and UK), APAC (China, India, and Japan), and Rest of World (ROW) [Dataset]. https://www.technavio.com/report/medical-terminology-software-market-industry-analysis
    Explore at:
    pdfAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Apr 25, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    TechNavio
    Authors
    Technavio
    Time period covered
    2025 - 2029
    Area covered
    Mexico, Germany, Canada, United Kingdom, United States
    Description

    Snapshot img

    Medical Terminology Software Market Size 2025-2029

    The medical terminology software market size is forecast to increase by USD 3.8 billion at a CAGR of 26.3% between 2024 and 2029.

    The market is experiencing significant growth, driven primarily by the increasing emphasis on minimizing medical errors and enhancing healthcare efficiency. With the expanding adoption of Healthcare Information and Communication Technology (HCIT), medical terminology software has become an indispensable tool for healthcare providers. However, market expansion is not without challenges. Regulatory hurdles, such as adherence to strict data privacy regulations, impact adoption and necessitate robust security measures. Additionally, supply chain inconsistencies and the need for continuous software updates to maintain accuracy pose challenges.
    Technological innovations, such as artificial intelligence and machine learning, are being integrated into medical terminology software to enhance its capabilities. Despite these obstacles, opportunities abound for companies that can effectively navigate these challenges and offer innovative solutions. By focusing on user-friendly interfaces, seamless integration with existing systems, and robust data security, medical terminology software providers can capitalize on the market's potential for growth.
    

    What will be the Size of the Medical Terminology Software Market during the forecast period?

    Request Free Sample

    In the dynamic US healthcare industry, decision support solutions have emerged as essential tools for healthcare organizations to enhance interoperability and improve patient care. Epic, a leading provider of electronic health records (EHR), is at the forefront of this trend, enabling clinical studies and data aggregation for better quality reporting. Government norms mandate compliance obligations for hospitals and hospital departments, necessitating seamless data integration and interoperability. This is crucial for effective public health surveillance, hospitalizations, and medical billing. Traditional techniques for managing patient data and clinical errors have given way to advanced technologies, including CROs and R&D operations, which prioritize decentralized clinical trials and data aggregation.
    Patient safety concerns, reimbursement, and disparity are significant factors driving the adoption of these technologies. Medical errors, a major concern for patient safety, can be mitigated through EHR and data integration, ensuring accurate claim submissions and condition tracking. Interoperability between healthcare providers plays a vital role in addressing disparities and improving patient epidemiology. The projection period for this market is marked by increasing emphasis on patient safety, government norms, and reimbursement, making it an exciting space for innovation and growth.
    

    How is this Medical Terminology Software Industry segmented?

    The medical terminology software industry research report provides comprehensive data (region-wise segment analysis), with forecasts and estimates in 'USD million' for the period 2025-2029, as well as historical data from 2019-2023 for the following segments.

    End-user
    
      Healthcare providers
      Healthcare payers
      Healthcare IT vendors
    
    
    Type
    
      Services
      Platforms
    
    
    Application
    
      Data integration
      Data aggregation
      Reimbursement
      Clinical trials
    
    
    Geography
    
      North America
    
        US
        Canada
        Mexico
    
    
      Europe
    
        France
        Germany
        Italy
        UK
    
    
      APAC
    
        China
        India
        Japan
    
    
      Rest of World (ROW)
    

    By End-user Insights

    The healthcare providers segment is estimated to witness significant growth during the forecast period. Medical terminology software is a crucial tool for various healthcare organizations, including hospitals, clinics, doctor offices, long-term care facilities, and other healthcare providers. This segment relies heavily on medical terminology software for accurate and consistent clinical documentation, coding, and information sharing. The software is indispensable for healthcare providers, as it streamlines clinical workflows, enhances patient data administration, and supports billing and coding procedures. The market for medical terminology software is witnessing significant advancements, driven by technological innovations, new healthcare solutions, and regulatory compliance obligations. Compliance with government norms, such as interoperability and data integrity, is a major factor propelling the adoption of medical terminology software. Big data derived from EHR systems is transforming healthcare delivery, particularly in managing chronic diseases

    New healthcare solutions, such as Electronic Health Records (EHR) and Decentralized Clinical Trials, are also fueling the demand for medical terminology software. Pricing analysis reveals that medical terminology software is available at various pri

  10. Public health outcomes framework: February 2018 data update

    • gov.uk
    Updated Feb 7, 2018
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Public Health England (2018). Public health outcomes framework: February 2018 data update [Dataset]. https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/public-health-outcomes-framework-february-2018-data-update
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Feb 7, 2018
    Dataset provided by
    GOV.UKhttp://gov.uk/
    Authors
    Public Health England
    Description

    The Public Health Outcomes Framework (PHOF) data update for February 2018 has been published by Public Health England (PHE).

    The data are presented in an interactive tool that allows users to view them in a user-friendly format. The data tool also provides links to further supporting and relevant information to aid understanding of public health in a local population.

    This update contains:

    • more recent data for 60 indicators
    • 3 new indicators
    • 1 indicator with a revised definition
    • revised back series data for 1 indicator
    • equalities and inequalities breakdowns for 35 indicators

    See the attached indicators updated document for full details of what’s in this update.

    The Public Health Outcomes Framework was refreshed in May 2016, following a consultation in 2015. We will add new indicators as they become available.

    See the government response to the consultation for details of the new framework.

    View previous Public Health Outcomes Framework data tool updates.

  11. Cloud Computing Market In Government Sector Market Analysis North America,...

    • technavio.com
    pdf
    Updated Oct 4, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Technavio (2024). Cloud Computing Market In Government Sector Market Analysis North America, Europe, APAC, South America, Middle East and Africa - US, China, UK, Germany, Japan - Size and Forecast 2024-2028 [Dataset]. https://www.technavio.com/report/cloud-computing-market-in-government-sector-industry-analysis
    Explore at:
    pdfAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Oct 4, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    TechNavio
    Authors
    Technavio
    Time period covered
    2024 - 2028
    Area covered
    United Kingdom, United States
    Description

    Snapshot img

    Cloud Computing Market In Government Sector Size 2024-2028

    The cloud computing market in government sector size is forecast to increase by USD 27.22 billion at a CAGR of 14.8% between 2023 and 2028. In the government sector, cloud computing market is experiencing significant growth due to several key drivers. One major factor is the increasing demand for cross-functional services, enabling various departments to streamline operations and collaborate more effectively. Another trend is the prioritization of cloud-based security solutions to safeguard sensitive data and ensure temperature stability, food safety, and contamination protection for applications in food packaging. Another trend is the rising demand for cloud-based security solutions, as government organizations seek to protect sensitive data and improve cybersecurity. The adoption of cloud services is also driven by the need for clarity and aesthetic appeal in various sectors, such as media and entertainment, where an oxygen and moisture barrier is crucial for maintaining the shelf life of digital content. The market analysis report highlights these trends and provides insights into the challenges, including the rising costs of cloud services and the need for seamless integration with existing systems.

    What will be the Size of the Market During the Forecast Period?

    Request Free Sample

    Cloud computing has emerged as a transformative technology in various sectors, including the US government. This technology offers numerous benefits, such as cost savings, scalability, and increased security. Government agencies are increasingly adopting cloud computing to streamline operations, improve data management, and enhance service delivery. Cloud computing enables government organizations to access technology infrastructure and applications over the internet, eliminating the need for on-premises hardware and software. This model allows agencies to pay only for the resources they use, reducing capital expenditures and operational costs.

    Moreover, cloud computing offers the flexibility to scale resources up or down as per the changing demands, ensuring optimal resource utilization. Security is a critical concern for government agencies, and cloud computing provides advanced security features to address these concerns. Cloud service providers invest heavily in security infrastructure, including firewalls, intrusion detection systems, and encryption technologies. These measures help protect sensitive government data from cyber threats, ensuring data confidentiality, integrity, and availability. Cloud computing also offers improved data management capabilities. Government agencies generate vast amounts of data daily, and managing this data can be a challenge. Cloud computing provides efficient data storage and management solutions, allowing agencies to store, process, and analyze data in real-time.

    Furthermore, this capability is essential for making informed decisions and responding to emerging trends and issues. Another significant advantage of cloud computing for government agencies is customization. Cloud service providers offer a range of customizable solutions tailored to specific agency requirements. This flexibility enables agencies to choose the right solution for their unique needs, ensuring optimal performance and productivity. Cloud computing also enhances collaboration and communication within government agencies and between agencies and external stakeholders. Cloud-based applications and tools enable real-time data sharing and collaboration, improving inter-agency coordination and response times. In conclusion, cloud computing offers numerous benefits to US government agencies, including cost savings, scalability, improved security, efficient data management, customization, and enhanced collaboration.

    Market Segmentation

    The market research report provides comprehensive data (region-wise segment analysis), with forecasts and estimates in 'USD million' for the period 2024-2028, as well as historical data from 2018-2022 for the following segments.

    Product
    
      Hardware
      Software
      Services
    
    
    Geography
    
      North America
    
        US
    
    
      Europe
    
        Germany
        UK
    
    
      APAC
    
        China
        Japan
    
    
      South America
    
    
    
      Middle East and Africa
    

    By Product Insights

    The hardware segment is estimated to witness significant growth during the forecast period. In the government sector, cloud computing has become an essential component of information and communication technology expenditures. The market for cloud IT hardware is expanding as IaaS, PaaS, and SaaS models gain popularity. The need for quick data processing and analytics is driving the adoption of cloud computing across various industries. Additionally, the availability of various deployment models, including public, private, and hybrid, has accelerated the growth of this market. Cloud computing's benefits exte

  12. G

    Global Personal Health Records Software Market Report

    • marketreportanalytics.com
    doc, pdf, ppt
    Updated Apr 24, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Market Report Analytics (2025). Global Personal Health Records Software Market Report [Dataset]. https://www.marketreportanalytics.com/reports/global-personal-health-records-software-market-96859
    Explore at:
    pdf, ppt, docAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Apr 24, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Market Report Analytics
    License

    https://www.marketreportanalytics.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.marketreportanalytics.com/privacy-policy

    Time period covered
    2025 - 2033
    Area covered
    Global
    Variables measured
    Market Size
    Description

    The global Personal Health Records (PHR) software market is experiencing robust growth, projected to reach $10.15 billion in 2025 and maintain a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 9.72% from 2025 to 2033. This expansion is driven by several key factors. Rising healthcare costs are pushing consumers and providers towards cost-effective solutions like PHR software for managing health information and reducing administrative burdens. The increasing adoption of telehealth and remote patient monitoring further fuels this growth, as PHR software acts as a central repository for patient data accessible across multiple platforms. Technological advancements, particularly in cloud computing and mobile app development, are creating more user-friendly and secure PHR solutions, improving patient engagement and data accessibility. Furthermore, stringent government regulations emphasizing data privacy and interoperability are shaping the market towards more secure and standardized PHR systems. The market segmentation reflects this diversified landscape, with mobile apps and software showing significant traction alongside cloud-based deployment models, catering to individual patient needs and healthcare provider workflows. The market's growth is not uniform across all segments and regions. North America, with its advanced healthcare infrastructure and high technology adoption rates, is expected to hold a significant market share, closely followed by Europe. However, the Asia-Pacific region is poised for rapid growth due to increasing healthcare expenditure, rising smartphone penetration, and growing awareness about personal health management. The competitive landscape is dynamic, with established players and innovative startups vying for market dominance. Key players are focusing on strategic partnerships, acquisitions, and product innovation to enhance their market position. While challenges remain, including concerns about data security and interoperability standards, the overall market outlook remains positive, driven by the ever-increasing demand for efficient and accessible healthcare solutions. Recent developments include: In July 2022, Innovaccer announced its Connected Digital Health solution, a new way for life sciences companies to rapidly deliver next-generation digital apps that surround therapeutics and devices with highly engaging patient experiences, improve clinical outcomes, and generate valuable real-world evidence, In May 2022 Validic, a leading provider of digital health and remote care solutions, announced that its Validic Inform digital health platform was selected as winner of the 'Best Connected Health Platform' award in the sixth annual MedTech Breakthrough Awards program conducted by MedTech Breakthrough, . Key drivers for this market are: Increasing Need for Streamlined Healthcare Information and Rising Initiatives to Encourage Patient Centric Personal Care, Rising Government Initiatives for Online Data Integration. Potential restraints include: Increasing Need for Streamlined Healthcare Information and Rising Initiatives to Encourage Patient Centric Personal Care, Rising Government Initiatives for Online Data Integration. Notable trends are: Mobile Apps and Software Segment is Expected to Witness Growth Over the Forecast Period.

  13. Government Open Data Management Platform Market Analysis, Size, and Forecast...

    • technavio.com
    pdf
    Updated Jul 20, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Technavio (2025). Government Open Data Management Platform Market Analysis, Size, and Forecast 2025-2029: North America (US, Canada, and Mexico), Europe (France, Germany, Italy, and UK), APAC (Australia, China, and India), and Rest of World (ROW) [Dataset]. https://www.technavio.com/report/government-open-data-management-platform-market-industry-analysis
    Explore at:
    pdfAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jul 20, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    TechNavio
    Authors
    Technavio
    License

    https://www.technavio.com/content/privacy-noticehttps://www.technavio.com/content/privacy-notice

    Time period covered
    2025 - 2029
    Area covered
    Canada, United Kingdom, United States
    Description

    Snapshot img

    Government Open Data Management Platform Market Size 2025-2029

    The government open data management platform market size is valued to increase USD 189.4 million, at a CAGR of 12.5% from 2024 to 2029. Rising demand for digitalization in government operations will drive the government open data management platform market.

    Major Market Trends & Insights

    North America dominated the market and accounted for a 38% growth during the forecast period.
    By End-user - Large enterprises segment was valued at USD 108.50 million in 2023
    By Deployment - On-premises segment accounted for the largest market revenue share in 2023
    

    Market Size & Forecast

    Market Opportunities: USD 138.56 million
    Market Future Opportunities: USD 189.40 million 
    CAGR : 12.5%
    North America: Largest market in 2023
    

    Market Summary

    The market is a dynamic and continually evolving landscape, driven by the rising demand for digitalization in government operations. Core technologies and applications, such as cloud computing, big data analytics, and artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML), are transforming the way governments manage and share open data. According to recent studies, the adoption rate of AI and ML in open data management platforms is projected to reach 30% by 2025. However, this market also faces challenges, including data privacy concerns related to open data platforms. Regulations, such as the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the U.S. Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), play a crucial role in shaping the market's evolution. Looking ahead, the forecast period for the market extends to 2027. This period is expected to bring significant opportunities for market growth, as governments worldwide continue to invest in digital transformation initiatives. Related markets such as the Cloud Computing Market and the Big Data Analytics Market are also experiencing robust growth, further fueling the demand for advanced open data management solutions.

    What will be the Size of the Government Open Data Management Platform Market during the forecast period?

    Get Key Insights on Market Forecast (PDF) Request Free Sample

    How is the Government Open Data Management Platform Market Segmented and what are the key trends of market segmentation?

    The government open data management platform industry research report provides comprehensive data (region-wise segment analysis), with forecasts and estimates in 'USD million' for the period 2025-2029, as well as historical data from 2019-2023 for the following segments. End-userLarge enterprisesSMEsDeploymentOn-premisesCloud-basedComponentSolutionsServicesGeographyNorth AmericaUSCanadaMexicoEuropeFranceGermanyItalyUKAPACAustraliaChinaIndiaRest of World (ROW)

    By End-user Insights

    The large enterprises segment is estimated to witness significant growth during the forecast period.

    In today's data-driven business landscape, large enterprises are increasingly utilizing government open data management platforms to access, manage, and derive valuable insights from the extensive datasets published by government agencies. These platforms enable organizations to stay informed about market trends, consumer behavior, and emerging opportunities by assessing demographic, socioeconomic, and infrastructure data, among others. Moreover, government open data can lead to significant cost savings. For instance, large enterprises can identify new suppliers through open data, optimize their supply chains, and improve energy efficiency. The adoption of government open data management platforms is on the rise, with an estimated 35% of large enterprises currently using these platforms. Furthermore, industry experts anticipate that over the next five years, up to 45% of businesses will integrate government open data into their operations. Effective management of government open data involves several key components. Data accessibility standards ensure that data is easily accessible and usable. Ontology development and data cataloging systems facilitate efficient data organization and discovery. Cloud data storage offers scalability and flexibility. Knowledge graph implementation and data transformation services enable data integration and analysis. Data privacy compliance, data lineage tracking, and real-time data feeds ensure data security and accuracy. User interface design and linked data principles enhance user experience and data interoperability. API documentation standards, metadata management tools, and data enrichment pipelines streamline data processing and integration. Data usage metrics, API integration strategies, and data breach prevention measures help organizations maximize the value of their data while minimizing risks. Data governance frameworks, data visualization dashboards, and data warehousing solutions provide a centralized platform for data management

  14. MAV State Managed Lands (WMAs)

    • gis-fws.opendata.arcgis.com
    • hub.arcgis.com
    Updated May 16, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (2024). MAV State Managed Lands (WMAs) [Dataset]. https://gis-fws.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/mav-state-managed-lands-wmas
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    May 16, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    U.S. Fish and Wildlife Servicehttp://www.fws.gov/
    Authors
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
    Area covered
    Description

    The USGS Protected Areas Database of the United States (PAD-US) is the nation's inventory of protected areas, including public land and voluntarily provided private protected areas, identified as an A-16 National Geospatial Data Asset in the Cadastre Theme ( https://communities.geoplatform.gov/ngda-cadastre/ ). The PAD-US is an ongoing project with several published versions of a spatial database including areas dedicated to the preservation of biological diversity, and other natural (including extraction), recreational, or cultural uses, managed for these purposes through legal or other effective means. The database was originally designed to support biodiversity assessments; however, its scope expanded in recent years to include all open space public and nonprofit lands and waters. Most are public lands owned in fee (the owner of the property has full and irrevocable ownership of the land); however, permanent and long-term easements, leases, agreements, Congressional (e.g. 'Wilderness Area'), Executive (e.g. 'National Monument'), and administrative designations (e.g. 'Area of Critical Environmental Concern') documented in agency management plans are also included. The PAD-US strives to be a complete inventory of U.S. public land and other protected areas, compiling “best available” data provided by managing agencies and organizations. The PAD-US geodatabase maps and describes areas using thirty-six attributes and five separate feature classes representing the U.S. protected areas network: Fee (ownership parcels), Designation, Easement, Marine, Proclamation and Other Planning Boundaries. An additional Combined feature class includes the full PAD-US inventory to support data management, queries, web mapping services, and analyses. The Feature Class (FeatClass) field in the Combined layer allows users to extract data types as needed. A Federal Data Reference file geodatabase lookup table (PADUS3_0Combined_Federal_Data_References) facilitates the extraction of authoritative federal data provided or recommended by managing agencies from the Combined PAD-US inventory.

    This PAD-US Version 3.0 dataset includes a variety of updates from the previous Version 2.1 dataset (USGS, 2020, https://doi.org/10.5066/P92QM3NT ), achieving goals to: 1) Annually update and improve spatial data representing the federal estate for PAD-US applications; 2) Update state and local lands data as state data-steward and PAD-US Team resources allow; and 3) Automate data translation efforts to increase PAD-US update efficiency. The following list summarizes the integration of "best available" spatial data to ensure public lands and other protected areas from all jurisdictions are represented in the PAD-US (other data were transferred from PAD-US 2.1).

    Federal updates - The USGS remains committed to updating federal fee owned lands data and major designation changes in annual PAD-US updates, where authoritative data provided directly by managing agencies are available or alternative data sources are recommended. The following is a list of updates or revisions associated with the federal estate:

    1) Major update of the Federal estate (fee ownership parcels, easement interest, and management designations where available), including authoritative data from 8 agencies: Bureau of Land Management (BLM), U.S. Census Bureau (Census Bureau), Department of Defense (DOD), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), National Park Service (NPS), Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), U.S. Forest Service (USFS), and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). The federal theme in PAD-US is developed in close collaboration with the Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC) Federal Lands Working Group (FLWG, https://communities.geoplatform.gov/ngda-govunits/federal-lands-workgroup/ ).

    2) Improved the representation (boundaries and attributes) of the National Park Service, U.S. Forest Service, Bureau of Land Management, and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service lands, in collaboration with agency data-stewards, in response to feedback from the PAD-US Team and stakeholders.

    3) Added a Federal Data Reference file geodatabase lookup table (PADUS3_0Combined_Federal_Data_References) to the PAD-US 3.0 geodatabase to facilitate the extraction (by Data Provider, Dataset Name, and/or Aggregator Source) of authoritative data provided directly (or recommended) by federal managing agencies from the full PAD-US inventory. A summary of the number of records (Frequency) and calculated GIS Acres (vs Documented Acres) associated with features provided by each Aggregator Source is included; however, the number of records may vary from source data as the "State Name" standard is applied to national files. The Feature Class (FeatClass) field in the table and geodatabase describe the data type to highlight overlapping features in the full inventory (e.g. Designation features often overlap Fee features) and to assist users in building queries for applications as needed.

    4) Scripted the translation of the Department of Defense, Census Bureau, and Natural Resource Conservation Service source data into the PAD-US format to increase update efficiency.

    5) Revised conservation measures (GAP Status Code, IUCN Category) to more accurately represent protected and conserved areas. For example, Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) Waterfowl Production Area Wetland Easements changed from GAP Status Code 2 to 4 as spatial data currently represents the complete parcel (about 10.54 million acres primarily in North Dakota and South Dakota). Only aliquot parts of these parcels are documented under wetland easement (1.64 million acres). These acreages are provided by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and are referenced in the PAD-US geodatabase Easement feature class 'Comments' field.

    State updates - The USGS is committed to building capacity in the state data-steward network and the PAD-US Team to increase the frequency of state land updates, as resources allow. The USGS supported efforts to significantly increase state inventory completeness with the integration of local parks data in the PAD-US 2.1, and developed a state-to-PAD-US data translation script during PAD-US 3.0 development to pilot in future updates. Additional efforts are in progress to support the technical and organizational strategies needed to increase the frequency of state updates. The PAD-US 3.0 included major updates to the following three states:

    1) California - added or updated state, regional, local, and nonprofit lands data from the California Protected Areas Database (CPAD), managed by GreenInfo Network, and integrated conservation and recreation measure changes following review coordinated by the data-steward with state managing agencies. Developed a data translation Python script (see Process Step 2 Source Data Documentation) in collaboration with the data-steward to increase the accuracy and efficiency of future PAD-US updates from CPAD.

    2) Virginia - added or updated state, local, and nonprofit protected areas data (and removed legacy data) from the Virginia Conservation Lands Database, provided by the Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation's Natural Heritage Program, and integrated conservation and recreation measure changes following review by the data-steward.

    3) West Virginia - added or updated state, local, and nonprofit protected areas data provided by the West Virginia University, GIS Technical Center.

    For more information regarding the PAD-US dataset please visit, https://www.usgs.gov/gapanalysis/PAD-US/. For more information about data aggregation please review the PAD-US Data Manual available at https://www.usgs.gov/core-science-systems/science-analytics-and-synthesis/gap/pad-us-data-manual .

    A version history of PAD-US updates is summarized below (See https://www.usgs.gov/core-science-systems/science-analytics-and-synthesis/gap/pad-us-data-history for more information): 1) First posted - April 2009 (Version 1.0 - available from the PAD-US: Team pad-us@usgs.gov). 2) Revised - May 2010 (Version 1.1 - available from the PAD-US: Team pad-us@usgs.gov). 3) Revised - April 2011 (Version 1.2 - available from the PAD-US: Team pad-us@usgs.gov). 4) Revised - November 2012 (Version 1.3) https://doi.org/10.5066/F79Z92XD 5) Revised - May 2016 (Version 1.4) https://doi.org/10.5066/F7G73BSZ 6) Revised - September 2018 (Version 2.0) https://doi.org/10.5066/P955KPLE 7) Revised - September 2020 (Version 2.1) https://doi.org/10.5066/P92QM3NT 8) Revised - January 2022 (Version 3.0) https://doi.org/10.5066/P9Q9LQ4B
    Comparing protected area trends between PAD-US versions is not recommended without consultation with USGS as many changes reflect improvements to agency and organization GIS systems, or conservation and recreation measure classification, rather than actual changes in protected area acquisition on the ground. These lands are commonly known as Wildlife Management Areas (WMAs) but that nomenclature varies by state.

  15. Public Health Outcomes Framework: November 2022 data update

    • gov.uk
    • s3.amazonaws.com
    Updated Nov 1, 2022
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Office for Health Improvement and Disparities (2022). Public Health Outcomes Framework: November 2022 data update [Dataset]. https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/public-health-outcomes-framework-november-2022-data-update
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 1, 2022
    Dataset provided by
    GOV.UKhttp://gov.uk/
    Authors
    Office for Health Improvement and Disparities
    Description

    The Office for Health Improvement and Disparities (OHID) has published the https://fingertips.phe.org.uk/profile/public-health-outcomes-framework" class="govuk-link">Public Health Outcomes Framework (PHOF) quarterly data update for November 2022.

    The data is presented in an interactive tool that allows users to view it in a user-friendly format. The data tool also provides links to further supporting information, to aid understanding of public health in a local population.

    26 indicators have been updated in this release:

    • 5 indicators from the wider determinants domain including employment and violent crime offences indicators
    • 7 indicators from the health improvement domain including child and maternal health indicators, smoking status at time of delivery and substance misuse
    • 14 population vaccination coverage indicators from the health protection domain

    See links to indicators updated document for full details of what’s in this update.

    View previous Public Health Outcomes Framework data tool updates.

  16. DfT: business plan quarterly data summary (QDS)

    • gov.uk
    Updated Nov 29, 2012
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Department for Transport (2012). DfT: business plan quarterly data summary (QDS) [Dataset]. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/business-plan-quarterly-data-summary-qds
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 29, 2012
    Dataset provided by
    GOV.UKhttp://gov.uk/
    Authors
    Department for Transport
    Description

    Under the new quarterly data summary (QDS) framework departments’ spending data is published every quarter; to show the taxpayer how the government is spending their money.

    The QDS grew out of commitments made in the 2011 Budget and the written ministerial statement on business plans. For the financial year 2012 to 2013 the QDS has been revised and improved in line with action 9 of the Civil Service Reform Plan to provide a common set of data that will enable comparisons of operational performance across government so that departments and individuals can be held to account.

    The QDS breaks down the total spend of the department in 3 ways:

    • by budget
    • by internal operation
    • by transaction.

    The QDS template is the same for all departments, though the individual detail of grants and policy will differ from department to department. In using this data:

    • people should ensure they take full note of the caveats noted in each department’s return
    • as the improvement of the QDS is an ongoing process data quality and completeness will be developed over time and therefore necessary caution should be applied to any comparative analysis undertaken

    Please note that the quarter 1 2012 to 2013 return for the Department of Transport (DfT) is for the core department only.

    April 2012

    Quarterly data summaries for April 2012 are as follows:

    January 2012

    Quarterly data summaries for January 2012 are as follows:

    October 2011

    Quarterly data summaries for October 2011 are as follows:

  17. f

    Krippendorff’s alpha for variables analysed in this study.

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jun 16, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Eric A. Jensen; Paul Wong; Mark S. Reed (2023). Krippendorff’s alpha for variables analysed in this study. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264914.t002
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 16, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Eric A. Jensen; Paul Wong; Mark S. Reed
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Krippendorff’s alpha for variables analysed in this study.

  18. f

    Prevalence of different types of impact associated with research data.

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jun 16, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Eric A. Jensen; Paul Wong; Mark S. Reed (2023). Prevalence of different types of impact associated with research data. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264914.t004
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 16, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Eric A. Jensen; Paul Wong; Mark S. Reed
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Prevalence of different types of impact associated with research data.

  19. D

    Smart Government Service Market Report | Global Forecast From 2025 To 2033

    • dataintelo.com
    csv, pdf, pptx
    Updated Jan 7, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Dataintelo (2025). Smart Government Service Market Report | Global Forecast From 2025 To 2033 [Dataset]. https://dataintelo.com/report/global-smart-government-service-market
    Explore at:
    csv, pdf, pptxAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jan 7, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Dataintelo
    License

    https://dataintelo.com/privacy-and-policyhttps://dataintelo.com/privacy-and-policy

    Time period covered
    2024 - 2032
    Area covered
    Global
    Description

    Smart Government Service Market Outlook



    The global smart government service market size is expected to reach USD 89 billion by 2032, exhibiting a robust CAGR of 19.8% from 2024 to 2032. The market size in 2023 was approximately USD 20 billion. This remarkable growth is fueled by the increasing need for digital transformation in public administration, alongside advancements in technology that enable seamless integration, data analytics, and enhanced citizen engagement.



    The surge in demand for efficient, transparent, and responsive governance is a significant growth driver for the smart government service market. Governments worldwide are adopting smart technologies to streamline processes, reduce operational costs, and improve service delivery to citizens. The integration of IoT, AI, and big data analytics into government systems is transforming traditional governance models, making them more efficient and citizen-centric. This transformation is not only enhancing the efficiency of public services but also fostering greater trust between governments and their citizens.



    Another critical growth factor is the increasing urbanization and the resultant need for smart city initiatives. With more than half of the worldÂ’s population now living in urban areas, there is an unprecedented demand for smart solutions that can handle urban challenges such as traffic management, waste management, and public safety. Smart government services are pivotal to the success of smart city projects, offering solutions that promote sustainable development, efficient resource utilization, and improved quality of life. Governments are investing heavily in ICT infrastructure and smart technologies to address these urban challenges effectively.



    Furthermore, the shift towards e-governance and digital government platforms is propelling the smart government service market. Digital government initiatives aim to make public services more accessible, transparent, and efficient. These initiatives include the development of online portals, mobile applications, and digital IDs that facilitate seamless interaction between citizens and government agencies. The COVID-19 pandemic has further accelerated the adoption of digital government services, as remote access to public services became essential during lockdowns and social distancing measures. This shift is expected to continue, driving sustained growth in the smart government service market.



    From a regional perspective, North America and Europe are leading the market due to their advanced technological infrastructure and high levels of digital literacy. However, the Asia Pacific region is anticipated to witness the highest growth rate over the forecast period, driven by rapid urbanization, government initiatives promoting digital transformation, and increasing investments in smart city projects. Countries like China, India, and Singapore are at the forefront of adopting smart government services, which is expected to significantly contribute to the regional market growth.



    The Government Service Cloud is emerging as a pivotal component in the evolution of smart government services. By leveraging cloud technology, government agencies can enhance their operational efficiency and service delivery. The Government Service Cloud offers a scalable and flexible platform that supports the integration of various digital government initiatives, enabling seamless access to public services. This cloud-based approach not only reduces the need for significant upfront investments in physical infrastructure but also allows for rapid deployment and scaling of services. As governments increasingly adopt cloud solutions, the Government Service Cloud is becoming instrumental in driving digital transformation, fostering innovation, and improving citizen engagement across various regions.



    Solution Analysis



    The smart government service market is segmented by solution into Government Resource Planning System, Security, Analytics, Open Data Platform, Network Management, Remote Monitoring, and Others. Each segment plays a crucial role in the overall ecosystem of smart government services, addressing specific needs and challenges faced by public administration.



    Government Resource Planning (GRP) systems are essential for the efficient management of government resources, including finances, human resources, and assets. These systems provide a unified platform for government agencies to manage their operations, impr

  20. a

    S USA.BdyOwn PADUS Proclamation USGS - Metadata Review

    • usfs.hub.arcgis.com
    Updated Aug 24, 2022
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    U.S. Forest Service (2022). S USA.BdyOwn PADUS Proclamation USGS - Metadata Review [Dataset]. https://usfs.hub.arcgis.com/documents/5ad0cb0ed6d84dfe9a874f9b6df90a43
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Aug 24, 2022
    Dataset authored and provided by
    U.S. Forest Service
    Area covered
    United States,
    Description

    The USGS Protected Areas Database of the United States (PAD-US) is the nation's inventory of protected areas, including public land and voluntarily provided private protected areas, identified as an A-16 National Geospatial Data Asset in the Cadastre Theme ( https://communities.geoplatform.gov/ngda-cadastre/ ). The PAD-US is an ongoing project with several published versions of a spatial database including areas dedicated to the preservation of biological diversity, and other natural (including extraction), recreational, or cultural uses, managed for these purposes through legal or other effective means. The database was originally designed to support biodiversity assessments; however, its scope expanded in recent years to include all open space public and nonprofit lands and waters. Most are public lands owned in fee (the owner of the property has full and irrevocable ownership of the land); however, permanent and long-term easements, leases, agreements, Congressional (e.g. 'Wilderness Area'), Executive (e.g. 'National Monument'), and administrative designations (e.g. 'Area of Critical Environmental Concern') documented in agency management plans are also included. The PAD-US strives to be a complete inventory of U.S. public land and other protected areas, compiling “best available” data provided by managing agencies and organizations. The PAD-US geodatabase maps and describes areas using thirty-six attributes and five separate feature classes representing the U.S. protected areas network: Fee (ownership parcels), Designation, Easement, Marine, Proclamation and Other Planning Boundaries. An additional Combined feature class includes the full PAD-US inventory to support data management, queries, web mapping services, and analyses. The Feature Class (FeatClass) field in the Combined layer allows users to extract data types as needed. A Federal Data Reference file geodatabase lookup table (PADUS3_0Combined_Federal_Data_References) facilitates the extraction of authoritative federal data provided or recommended by managing agencies from the Combined PAD-US inventory. This PAD-US Version 3.0 dataset includes a variety of updates from the previous Version 2.1 dataset (USGS, 2020, https://doi.org/10.5066/P92QM3NT ), achieving goals to: 1) Annually update and improve spatial data representing the federal estate for PAD-US applications; 2) Update state and local lands data as state data-steward and PAD-US Team resources allow; and 3) Automate data translation efforts to increase PAD-US update efficiency. The following list summarizes the integration of "best available" spatial data to ensure public lands and other protected areas from all jurisdictions are represented in the PAD-US (other data were transferred from PAD-US 2.1). Federal updates - The USGS remains committed to updating federal fee owned lands data and major designation changes in annual PAD-US updates, where authoritative data provided directly by managing agencies are available or alternative data sources are recommended. The following is a list of updates or revisions associated with the federal estate: 1) Major update of the Federal estate (fee ownership parcels, easement interest, and management designations where available), including authoritative data from 8 agencies: Bureau of Land Management (BLM), U.S. Census Bureau (Census Bureau), Department of Defense (DOD), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), National Park Service (NPS), Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), U.S. Forest Service (USFS), and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). The federal theme in PAD-US is developed in close collaboration with the Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC) Federal Lands Working Group (FLWG, https://communities.geoplatform.gov/ngda-govunits/federal-lands-workgroup/ ). 2) Improved the representation (boundaries and attributes) of the National Park Service, U.S. Forest Service, Bureau of Land Management, and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service lands, in collaboration with agency data-stewards, in response to feedback from the PAD-US Team and stakeholders. 3) Added a Federal Data Reference file geodatabase lookup table (PADUS3_0Combined_Federal_Data_References) to the PAD-US 3.0 geodatabase to facilitate the extraction (by Data Provider, Dataset Name, and/or Aggregator Source) of authoritative data provided directly (or recommended) by federal managing agencies from the full PAD-US inventory. A summary of the number of records (Frequency) and calculated GIS Acres (vs Documented Acres) associated with features provided by each Aggregator Source is included; however, the number of records may vary from source data as the "State Name" standard is applied to national files. The Feature Class (FeatClass) field in the table and geodatabase describe the data type to highlight overlapping features in the full inventory (e.g. Designation features often overlap Fee features) and to assist users in building queries for applications as needed. 4) Scripted the translation of the Department of Defense, Census Bureau, and Natural Resource Conservation Service source data into the PAD-US format to increase update efficiency. 5) Revised conservation measures (GAP Status Code, IUCN Category) to more accurately represent protected and conserved areas. For example, Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) Waterfowl Production Area Wetland Easements changed from GAP Status Code 2 to 4 as spatial data currently represents the complete parcel (about 10.54 million acres primarily in North Dakota and South Dakota). Only aliquot parts of these parcels are documented under wetland easement (1.64 million acres). These acreages are provided by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and are referenced in the PAD-US geodatabase Easement feature class 'Comments' field. State updates - The USGS is committed to building capacity in the state data-steward network and the PAD-US Team to increase the frequency of state land updates, as resources allow. The USGS supported efforts to significantly increase state inventory completeness with the integration of local parks data in the PAD-US 2.1, and developed a state-to-PAD-US data translation script during PAD-US 3.0 development to pilot in future updates. Additional efforts are in progress to support the technical and organizational strategies needed to increase the frequency of state updates. The PAD-US 3.0 included major updates to the following three states: 1) California - added or updated state, regional, local, and nonprofit lands data from the California Protected Areas Database (CPAD), managed by GreenInfo Network, and integrated conservation and recreation measure changes following review coordinated by the data-steward with state managing agencies. Developed a data translation Python script (see Process Step 2 Source Data Documentation) in collaboration with the data-steward to increase the accuracy and efficiency of future PAD-US updates from CPAD. 2) Virginia - added or updated state, local, and nonprofit protected areas data (and removed legacy data) from the Virginia Conservation Lands Database, provided by the Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation's Natural Heritage Program, and integrated conservation and recreation measure changes following review by the data-steward. 3) West Virginia - added or updated state, local, and nonprofit protected areas data provided by the West Virginia University, GIS Technical Center. For more information regarding the PAD-US dataset please visit, https://www.usgs.gov/gapanalysis/PAD-US/. For more information about data aggregation please review the PAD-US Data Manual available at https://www.usgs.gov/core-science-systems/science-analytics-and-synthesis/gap/pad-us-data-manual . A version history of PAD-US updates is summarized below (See https://www.usgs.gov/core-science-systems/science-analytics-and-synthesis/gap/pad-us-data-history for more information): 1) First posted - April 2009 (Version 1.0 - available from the PAD-US: Team pad-us@usgs.gov). 2) Revised - May 2010 (Version 1.1 - available from the PAD-US: Team pad-us@usgs.gov). 3) Revised - April 2011 (Version 1.2 - available from the PAD-US: Team pad-us@usgs.gov). 4) Revised - November 2012 (Version 1.3) https://doi.org/10.5066/F79Z92XD 5) Revised - May 2016 (Version 1.4) https://doi.org/10.5066/F7G73BSZ 6) Revised - September 2018 (Version 2.0) https://doi.org/10.5066/P955KPLE 7) Revised - September 2020 (Version 2.1) https://doi.org/10.5066/P92QM3NT 8) Revised - January 2022 (Version 3.0) https://doi.org/10.5066/P9Q9LQ4B Comparing protected area trends between PAD-US versions is not recommended without consultation with USGS as many changes reflect improvements to agency and organization GIS systems, or conservation and recreation measure classification, rather than actual changes in protected area acquisition on the ground.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
United States. Bureau of Justice Statistics (2024). Federal Justice Statistics Program: Paired-Agency Linked Files, 1994-2022 [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30701.v13
Organization logo

Federal Justice Statistics Program: Paired-Agency Linked Files, 1994-2022

Explore at:
Dataset updated
May 28, 2024
Dataset provided by
Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Researchhttps://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/pages/
Authors
United States. Bureau of Justice Statistics
License

https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/studies/30701/termshttps://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/studies/30701/terms

Time period covered
Oct 1, 1994 - Sep 30, 2022
Area covered
United States
Description

The new FJSRC linking system, implemented with the 2008 FJSRC data, includes sets of agency dyad linked files created by improved methods of algorithmic matching. There are both inter-agency linked files and intra-agency dyad linked files. The inter-agency matched pair files (or "dyads") permit the linking of records from two different source agencies for adjacent stages of federal case processing by providing a crosswalk of the agency-specific key ID variables for the two agency data files in the pair. These agency ID variables (sequential ID numbers) may be used to link records from one agency's standard analysis file (SAF) to the next. The system enables users to track individual defendant-cases through stages of the federal criminal justice system (from arrest to prosecution, adjudication, sentencing, and corrections) sequentially, one agency dyad pair at a time. Each inter-agency paired linked file relates the sequential record numbers (i.e. SEQ_NUM) included in the SAFs from one agency/stage to another. The intra-agency matched pair files (also dyads) permit the same type of linking as described above except that the linkages are within the same federal agency. The linkages are to different stages of case processing withing a particular agency. The system covers all data years from 1994-2022. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, D.C.) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute through 2012. Data from 2013 and on were prepared by Abt Associates.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu