These files cover the Births or Natality chapters of the published volumes of vital statistics from the US National Center for Health Statistics for the period 1931 through 1968. In the 1937 report you could find the Puerto Rico supplement. They have the same content as the files at http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/vsus.htm but are compressed. Acrobat 5.0 or better is required to view them.

MMWR Surveillance Summary 66 (No. SS-1):1-8 found that nonmetropolitan areas have significant numbers of potentially excess deaths from the five leading causes of death. These figures accompany this report by presenting information on potentially excess deaths in nonmetropolitan and metropolitan areas at the state level. They also add additional years of data and options for selecting different age ranges and benchmarks. Potentially excess deaths are defined in MMWR Surveillance Summary 66(No. SS-1):1-8 as deaths that exceed the numbers that would be expected if the death rates of states with the lowest rates (benchmarks) occurred across all states. They are calculated by subtracting expected deaths for specific benchmarks from observed deaths. Not all potentially excess deaths can be prevented; some areas might have characteristics that predispose them to higher rates of death. However, many potentially excess deaths might represent deaths that could be prevented through improved public health programs that support healthier behaviors and neighborhoods or better access to health care services. Mortality data for U.S. residents come from the National Vital Statistics System. Estimates based on fewer than 10 observed deaths are not shown and shaded yellow on the map. Underlying cause of death is based on the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10) Heart disease (I00-I09, I11, I13, and I20–I51) Cancer (C00–C97) Unintentional injury (V01–X59 and Y85–Y86) Chronic lower respiratory disease (J40–J47) Stroke (I60–I69) Locality (nonmetropolitan vs. metropolitan) is based on the Office of Management and Budget’s 2013 county-based classification scheme. Benchmarks are based on the three states with the lowest age and cause-specific mortality rates. Potentially excess deaths for each state are calculated by subtracting deaths at the benchmark rates (expected deaths) from observed deaths. Users can explore three benchmarks: “2010 Fixed” is a fixed benchmark based on the best performing States in 2010. “2005 Fixed” is a fixed benchmark based on the best performing States in 2005. “Floating” is based on the best performing States in each year so change from year to year. SOURCES CDC/NCHS, National Vital Statistics System, mortality data (see http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/deaths.htm); and CDC WONDER (see http://wonder.cdc.gov). REFERENCES Moy E, Garcia MC, Bastian B, Rossen LM, Ingram DD, Faul M, Massetti GM, Thomas CC, Hong Y, Yoon PW, Iademarco MF. Leading Causes of Death in Nonmetropolitan and Metropolitan Areas – United States, 1999-2014. MMWR Surveillance Summary 2017; 66(No. SS-1):1-8. Garcia MC, Faul M, Massetti G, Thomas CC, Hong Y, Bauer UE, Iademarco MF. Reducing Potentially Excess Deaths from the Five Leading Causes of Death in the Rural United States. MMWR Surveillance Summary 2017; 66(No. SS-2):1–7.

US: Improved Sanitation Facilities: % of Population with Access data was reported at 100.000 % in 2015. This stayed constant from the previous number of 100.000 % for 2014. US: Improved Sanitation Facilities: % of Population with Access data is updated yearly, averaging 99.800 % from Dec 1990 (Median) to 2015, with 26 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 100.000 % in 2015 and a record low of 99.500 % in 1991. US: Improved Sanitation Facilities: % of Population with Access data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s USA – Table US.World Bank: Health Statistics. Access to improved sanitation facilities refers to the percentage of the population using improved sanitation facilities. Improved sanitation facilities are likely to ensure hygienic separation of human excreta from human contact. They include flush/pour flush (to piped sewer system, septic tank, pit latrine), ventilated improved pit (VIP) latrine, pit latrine with slab, and composting toilet.; ; WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme (JMP) for Water Supply and Sanitation (http://www.wssinfo.org/).; Weighted average;

United States US: Death Rate: Crude: per 1000 People data was reported at 8.400 Ratio in 2016. This records a decrease from the previous number of 8.440 Ratio for 2015. United States US: Death Rate: Crude: per 1000 People data is updated yearly, averaging 8.700 Ratio from Dec 1960 (Median) to 2016, with 57 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 9.800 Ratio in 1968 and a record low of 7.900 Ratio in 2009. United States US: Death Rate: Crude: per 1000 People data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s United States – Table US.World Bank.WDI: Population and Urbanization Statistics. Crude death rate indicates the number of deaths occurring during the year, per 1,000 population estimated at midyear. Subtracting the crude death rate from the crude birth rate provides the rate of natural increase, which is equal to the rate of population change in the absence of migration.; ; (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects: 2017 Revision. (2) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (3) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (4) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Reprot (various years), (5) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database, and (6) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme.; Weighted average;

Information on the fetal death data tape file was abstracted from the Report of Fetal Death forms received in all the States and the District of Columbia, with a record on the data file for each report of a fetal death received. The data is provided to the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) through the Vital Statistics Cooperative Program by the registration offices of all States, the District of Columbia, and New York City. Data from New York, excluding New York City, were submitte d in machine readable form. All other 1992 data were coded and keyed by the U.S. Bureau of the Census. Fetal death data are limited to deaths occurring within the United States to U.S. residents and nonresidents. Fetal deaths occurring to U.S. citizens outside the United States are not included in this data file. In NCHS tabulations by place of residence, fetal deaths to nonresidents of the United States are excluded. The foreign resident records can be identified by code 4 in tape location 7 of the data tape. In addition, the majority of fetal death tables published by NCHS include only those fetal deaths with stated or presumed gestation of 20 weeks or more (see the Technical Appendix). Those records identified with a 2 in tape location 5 are included in these tabulations. All other records are excluded. Effective January 1, 1989, a revised U-S. Standard Report of Fetal Death replaced the 1978 revision. The 1989 revision provides a wide variety of new information on maternal and fetal health characteristics. Questions on complications of labor and delivery and congenital anomalies of fetus were changed from an open-ended question to a checkbox format to improve reporting of information. Several new items were added that improve the data files value for monitoring and research of factors affecting fetal mortality. The Office of Management and Budget revised its designation of metropolitan statistical areas based on figures from the 1990 Census. Effective with the 1990 data file, NCHS has been using these new definitions and codes as indicated in the listing of 320 Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAS), Primary Metropolitan Statistical Areas (PMSAS), and New England County Metropolitan Ar eas (NEaSS) included in this documentation. There are also 20 Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Areas (mSAS), which are made up of PMSAS. Other geographic changes based on the 1990 Census will be implemented later. NCHS has adopted a new policy on release of vital statistics unit record data files. This new policy was implemented with the 1989 vital event files to prevent the inadvertent disclosure of individuals and institutions. As a result, this file does not contain the actual day of the death. The geographic detail is also restricted-only counties and cities of 100,000 or more population based on the 1980 Census as well as metropolitan areas of 100,000 or more population based on the 1990 Census, are identified. NOSB = Note to Users: This CD is part of a collection located in the Data Archive at the Odum Institute for Research in Social Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. The collection is located in Room 10, Manning Hall. Users may check out the CDs, subscribing to the honor system. Items may be checked out for a period of two weeks. Loan forms are located adjacent to the collection.

US: People Using Safely Managed Sanitation Services: % of Population data was reported at 89.499 % in 2015. This records an increase from the previous number of 89.448 % for 2014. US: People Using Safely Managed Sanitation Services: % of Population data is updated yearly, averaging 89.281 % from Dec 2000 (Median) to 2015, with 16 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 89.499 % in 2015 and a record low of 89.074 % in 2000. US: People Using Safely Managed Sanitation Services: % of Population data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s USA – Table US.World Bank: Health Statistics. The percentage of people using improved sanitation facilities that are not shared with other households and where excreta are safely disposed of in situ or transported and treated offsite. Improved sanitation facilities include flush/pour flush to piped sewer systems, septic tanks or pit latrines: ventilated improved pit latrines, compositing toilets or pit latrines with slabs.; ; WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme (JMP) for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (washdata.org).; Weighted Average;

This dataset contains model-based county estimates. PLACES covers the entire United States—50 states and the District of Columbia—at county, place, census tract, and ZIP Code Tabulation Area levels. It provides information uniformly on this large scale for local areas at four geographic levels. Estimates were provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Division of Population Health, Epidemiology and Surveillance Branch. PLACES was funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation in conjunction with the CDC Foundation. This dataset includes estimates for 40 measures: 12 for health outcomes, 7 for preventive services use, 4 for chronic disease-related health risk behaviors, 7 for disabilities, 3 for health status, and 7 for health-related social needs. These estimates can be used to identify emerging health problems and to help develop and carry out effective, targeted public health prevention activities. Because the small area model cannot detect effects due to local interventions, users are cautioned against using these estimates for program or policy evaluations. Data sources used to generate these model-based estimates are Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) 2022 or 2021 data, Census Bureau 2022 county population estimate data, and American Community Survey 2018–2022 estimates. The 2024 release uses 2022 BRFSS data for 36 measures and 2021 BRFSS data for 4 measures (high blood pressure, high cholesterol, cholesterol screening, and taking medicine for high blood pressure control among those with high blood pressure) that the survey collects data on every other year. More information about the methodology can be found at www.cdc.gov/places.

Code file used to run the statistical model in the Stan modeling language. (STAN 3 kb)

United States US: Improved Water Source: % of Population with Access data was reported at 99.200 % in 2015. This stayed constant from the previous number of 99.200 % for 2014. United States US: Improved Water Source: % of Population with Access data is updated yearly, averaging 98.900 % from Dec 1990 (Median) to 2015, with 26 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 99.200 % in 2015 and a record low of 98.400 % in 1991. United States US: Improved Water Source: % of Population with Access data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s United States – Table US.World Bank.WDI: Health Statistics. Access to an improved water source refers to the percentage of the population using an improved drinking water source. The improved drinking water source includes piped water on premises (piped household water connection located inside the user’s dwelling, plot or yard), and other improved drinking water sources (public taps or standpipes, tube wells or boreholes, protected dug wells, protected springs, and rainwater collection).; ; WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme (JMP) for Water Supply and Sanitation (http://www.wssinfo.org/).; Weighted average;

In the past four centuries, the population of the Thirteen Colonies and United States of America has grown from a recorded 350 people around the Jamestown colony in Virginia in 1610, to an estimated 346 million in 2025. While the fertility rate has now dropped well below replacement level, and the population is on track to go into a natural decline in the 2040s, projected high net immigration rates mean the population will continue growing well into the next century, crossing the 400 million mark in the 2070s. Indigenous population Early population figures for the Thirteen Colonies and United States come with certain caveats. Official records excluded the indigenous population, and they generally remained excluded until the late 1800s. In 1500, in the first decade of European colonization of the Americas, the native population living within the modern U.S. borders was believed to be around 1.9 million people. The spread of Old World diseases, such as smallpox, measles, and influenza, to biologically defenseless populations in the New World then wreaked havoc across the continent, often wiping out large portions of the population in areas that had not yet made contact with Europeans. By the time of Jamestown's founding in 1607, it is believed the native population within current U.S. borders had dropped by almost 60 percent. As the U.S. expanded, indigenous populations were largely still excluded from population figures as they were driven westward, however taxpaying Natives were included in the census from 1870 to 1890, before all were included thereafter. It should be noted that estimates for indigenous populations in the Americas vary significantly by source and time period. Migration and expansion fuels population growth The arrival of European settlers and African slaves was the key driver of population growth in North America in the 17th century. Settlers from Britain were the dominant group in the Thirteen Colonies, before settlers from elsewhere in Europe, particularly Germany and Ireland, made a large impact in the mid-19th century. By the end of the 19th century, improvements in transport technology and increasing economic opportunities saw migration to the United States increase further, particularly from southern and Eastern Europe, and in the first decade of the 1900s the number of migrants to the U.S. exceeded one million people in some years. It is also estimated that almost 400,000 African slaves were transported directly across the Atlantic to mainland North America between 1500 and 1866 (although the importation of slaves was abolished in 1808). Blacks made up a much larger share of the population before slavery's abolition. Twentieth and twenty-first century The U.S. population has grown steadily since 1900, reaching one hundred million in the 1910s, two hundred million in the 1960s, and three hundred million in 2007. Since WWII, the U.S. has established itself as the world's foremost superpower, with the world's largest economy, and most powerful military. This growth in prosperity has been accompanied by increases in living standards, particularly through medical advances, infrastructure improvements, clean water accessibility. These have all contributed to higher infant and child survival rates, as well as an increase in life expectancy (doubling from roughly 40 to 80 years in the past 150 years), which have also played a large part in population growth. As fertility rates decline and increases in life expectancy slows, migration remains the largest factor in population growth. Since the 1960s, Latin America has now become the most common origin for migrants in the U.S., while immigration rates from Asia have also increased significantly. It remains to be seen how immigration restrictions of the current administration affect long-term population projections for the United States.

Historical and emerging trends in U.S. population mortality by cause of death

This dataset contains model-based census tract estimates. PLACES covers the entire United States—50 states and the District of Columbia—at county, place, census tract, and ZIP Code Tabulation Area levels. It provides information uniformly on this large scale for local areas at four geographic levels. Estimates were provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Division of Population Health, Epidemiology and Surveillance Branch. PLACES was funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation in conjunction with the CDC Foundation. The dataset includes estimates for 40 measures: 12 for health outcomes, 7 for preventive services use, 4 for chronic disease-related health risk behaviors, 7 for disabilities, 3 for health status, and 7 for health-related social needs. These estimates can be used to identify emerging health problems and to help develop and carry out effective, targeted public health prevention activities. Because the small area model cannot detect effects due to local interventions, users are cautioned against using these estimates for program or policy evaluations. Data sources used to generate these model-based estimates are Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) 2022 or 2021 data, Census Bureau 2020 population data, and American Community Survey 2018–2022 estimates. The 2024 release uses 2022 BRFSS data for 36 measures and 2021 BRFSS data for 4 measures (high blood pressure, high cholesterol, cholesterol screening, and taking medicine for high blood pressure control among those with high blood pressure) that the survey collects data on every other year. More information about the methodology can be found at www.cdc.gov/places.

Snapshot img

US Population Health Management (PHM) Market Size 2025-2029

The us population health management (phm) market size is forecast to increase by USD 6.04 billion at a CAGR of 7.4% between 2024 and 2029.

The Population Health Management (PHM) market in the US is experiencing significant growth, driven by the increasing adoption of healthcare IT solutions and analytics. These technologies enable healthcare providers to collect, analyze, and act on patient data to improve health outcomes and reduce costs. However, the high perceived costs associated with PHM solutions pose a challenge for some organizations, limiting their ability to fully implement and optimize these technologies. Despite this obstacle, the potential benefits of PHM, including improved patient care and population health, make it a strategic priority for many healthcare organizations. To capitalize on this opportunity, companies must focus on cost-effective solutions and innovative approaches to addressing the challenges of PHM implementation and optimization. By leveraging advanced analytics, cloud technologies, and strategic partnerships, organizations can overcome cost barriers and deliver better care to their patient populations.

What will be the size of the US Population Health Management (PHM) Market during the forecast period?

Explore in-depth regional segment analysis with market size data - historical 2019-2023 and forecasts 2025-2029 - in the full report.
Request Free Sample

The Population Health Management (PHM) market in the US is experiencing significant advancements, integrating various elements to improve patient outcomes and reduce healthcare costs. Public health surveillance and data governance ensure accurate population health data, enabling healthcare leaders to identify health disparities and target interventions. Quality measures and health literacy initiatives promote transparency and patient activation, while data visualization and business intelligence facilitate data-driven decision-making. Behavioral health integration, substance abuse treatment, and mental health services address the growing need for holistic care, and outcome-based contracts incentivize providers to focus on patient outcomes. Health communication, community health workers, and patient portals enhance patient engagement, while wearable devices and mHealth technologies provide real-time data for personalized care plans. Precision medicine and predictive modeling leverage advanced analytics to tailor treatment approaches, and social service integration addresses the social determinants of health. Health data management, data storytelling, and healthcare innovation continue to drive market growth, transforming the industry and improving overall population health.

How is this market segmented?

The market research report provides comprehensive data (region-wise segment analysis), with forecasts and estimates in 'USD billion' for the period 2025-2029, as well as historical data from 2019-2023 for the following segments. ProductSoftwareServicesDeploymentCloudOn-premisesEnd-userHealthcare providersHealthcare payersEmployers and government bodiesGeographyNorth AmericaUS

By Product Insights

The software segment is estimated to witness significant growth during the forecast period.

Population Health Management (PHM) software in the US gathers patient data from healthcare systems and utilizes advanced analytics tools, including data visualization and business intelligence, to predict health conditions and improve patient care. PHM software aims to enhance healthcare efficiency, reduce costs, and ensure quality patient care. By analyzing accurate patient data, PHM software enables the identification of community health risks, leading to proactive interventions and better health outcomes. The adoption of PHM software is on the rise in the US due to the growing emphasis on value-based care and the increasing prevalence of chronic diseases. Machine learning, artificial intelligence, and predictive analytics are integral components of PHM software, enabling healthcare payers to develop personalized care plans and improve care coordination. Data integration and interoperability facilitate seamless data sharing among various healthcare stakeholders, while data visualization tools help in making informed decisions. Public health agencies and healthcare providers leverage PHM software for population health research, disease management programs, and quality improvement initiatives. Cloud computing and data warehousing provide the necessary infrastructure for storing and managing large volumes of population health data. Healthcare regulations mandate the adoption of PHM software to ensure compliance with data privacy and security standards. PHM software also supports care management services, patient engagement platforms, and remote patient monitoring, empowering patients to take charge of their health. Welln

Over the period 2007-2011, life expectancy at birth was 78.5 years for the total population in New Mexico, 75.8 years for males, and 81.3 years for females.For comparison, in 2011, life expectancy at birth was 78.7 years for the total U.S. population, 76.3 years for males, and 81.1 years for females. (http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6335a8.htm?s_cid=mm6335a8_e )PLEASE NOTE: The data in this map corrects, updates and replaces life expectancy data included in the 2012 Bernalillo County Place Matters 'Community Health Equity Report'. Compare life expectancy in Europe and the USA - Map ImageNOTE: Changes in life expectancy (Increase, Decrease, No Change) over the periods 1999-2003 to 2007-2011 are tested for statistical significance using a rule of one standard deviation.

Life Expectancy at Birth, Small Areas, by Sex, 1999-2003 and 2007-2011 - LEBSASEX

Summary: Life Expectancy at Birth, Small Areas, by Sex, 1999-2003 and 2007-2011

Prepared by: NEW MEXICO COMMUNITY DATA COLLABORATIVE, http://nmcdc.maps.arcgis.com/home/index.html ; T Scharmen, thomas.scharmen@state.nm.us, 505-897-5700 x126,

Data Sources: New Mexico Death Certificate Database, Office of Vital Records and Statistics, New Mexico Department of Health; Population Estimates: University of New Mexico, Geospatial and Population Studies (GPS) Program, http://bber.unm.edu/bber_research_demPop.html. Retrieved Mon, 21 June 2014 from New Mexico Department of Health, Indicator-Based Information System for Public Health Web site: http://ibis.health.state.nm.us

Shapefile: http://nmcdc.maps.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=1e97d2715d8640ab9023fa35fc7b2634

Feature: http://nmcdc.maps.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=3104749c2c094044914abf9ba6953eab

Master File:

NM DATA VARIABLE DEFINITION

999 SANO Small Area Number

NEW MEXICO SANAME Small Area Name

9250534 PB9903 Population at Risk, Both Sexes, 1999-2003

77.7 LEB9903 Life Expectancy at Birth, Both Sexes, 1999-2003

77.7 CILB9903 Lower Confidence Interval for Life Expectancy at Birth, Both Sexes, 1999-2003

77.7 CIUB9903 Upper Confidence Interval for Life Expectancy at Birth, Both Sexes, 1999-2003

10188104 PB0711 Population at Risk, Both Sexes, 2007-2011

78.5 LEB0711 Life Expectancy at Birth, Both Sexes, 2007-2011

78.5 CILB0711 Lower Confidence Interval for Life Expectancy at Birth, Both Sexes, 2007-2011

78.5 CIUB0711 Upper Confidence Interval for Life Expectancy at Birth, Both Sexes, 2007-2011

0.8 LEBDIFF Difference in Life Expectancy, Both Sexes, 2007-2011 MINUS 1999-2003

INCREASE LEBSIG Trend of the Difference in Life Expectancy, Both Sexes, (1 standard deviation = 68.2% confidence interval)

4683013 PF9903 Population at Risk, Females, 1999-2003

80.6 LEF9903 Life Expectancy at Birth, Females, 1999-2003

80.6 CILF9903 Lower Confidence Interval for Life Expectancy at Birth, Females, 1999-2003

80.6 CIUF9903 Upper Confidence Interval for Life Expectancy at Birth, Females, 1999-2003

5155192 PF0711 Population at Risk, Females, 2007-2011

81.3 LEF0711 Life Expectancy at Birth, Females, 2007-2011

81.3 CILF0711 Lower Confidence Interval for Life Expectancy at Birth, Females, 2007-2011

81.3 CIUF0711 Upper Confidence Interval for Life Expectancy at Birth, Females, 2007-2011

0.7 LEFDIFF Difference in Life Expectancy, Females, 2007-2011 MINUS 1999-2003

INCREASE LEFSIG Trend of the Difference in Life Expectancy, Females, (1 standard deviation = 68.2% confidence interval)

4567521 PM9903 Population at Risk, Males, 1999-2003

74.8 LEM9903 Life Expectancy at Birth, Males, 1999-2003

74.8 CILM9903 Lower Confidence Interval for Life Expectancy at Birth, Males, 1999-2003

74.8 CIUM9903 Upper Confidence Interval for Life Expectancy at Birth, Males, 1999-2003

5032911 PM0711 Population at Risk, Males, 2007-2011

75.8 LEM0711 Life Expectancy at Birth, Males, 2007-2011

75.7 CILM0711 Lower Confidence Interval for Life Expectancy at Birth, Males, 2007-2011

75.8 CIUM0711 Upper Confidence Interval for Life Expectancy at Birth, Males, 2007-2011

1 LEMDIFF Difference in Life Expectancy, Males, 2007-2011 MINUS 1999-2003

INCREASE LEMSIG Trend of the Difference in Life Expectancy, Males, (1 standard deviation = 68.2% confidence interval)

1.077540107 FMRT9903 Female to Male Ratio of Life Expectancy, 1999-2003

1.072559367 FMRT0711 Female to Male Ratio of Life Expectancy, 2007-2011

5.8 FMDT9903 Female Life Expectancy MINUS Male Life Expectancy, 1999-2003

5.5 FMDT0711 Female Life Expectancy MINUS Male Life Expectancy, 2007-2011

-0.3 FMDTDIFF Difference in Female Life Expectancy MINUS Male Life Expectancy, over both time periods, in Years

Snapshot img

Population Health Management Market Size and Forecast 2025-2029

The population health management market size estimates the market to reach by USD 19.40 billion, at a CAGR of 10.7% between 2024 and 2029. North America is expected to account for 68% of the growth contribution to the global market during this period. In 2019 the software segment was valued at USD 16.04 billion and has demonstrated steady growth since then.

The market is experiencing significant growth, driven by the increasing adoption of healthcare IT and the rising focus on personalized medicine. Healthcare providers are recognizing the value of population health management platforms in improving patient outcomes and reducing costs. The implementation of these systems enables proactive care management, disease prevention, and population health analysis. However, the market faces challenges as well. The cost of installing population health management platforms can be a significant barrier for smaller healthcare organizations. Additionally, ensuring data security and interoperability across various systems remains a major concern.
Effective data management and integration are essential for population health management to deliver its full potential. Companies seeking to capitalize on market opportunities must address these challenges and provide cost-effective, secure, and interoperable solutions. By focusing on these areas, they can help healthcare providers optimize their population health management initiatives and improve patient care.

What will be the Size of the Population Health Management Market during the forecast period?

Request Free Sample

The market continues to evolve, driven by advancements in technology and a growing focus on value-based care. Risk adjustment models, which help account for the variability in health risks among patient populations, are increasingly being adopted to improve care coordination and health outcome measures. For instance, a leading healthcare organization implemented risk stratification models, resulting in a 20% reduction in hospital readmissions. Remote patient monitoring, public health surveillance, and disease outbreak response are crucial applications of population health management. These technologies enable real-time health data collection, allowing for early intervention and improved health equity initiatives. Chronic disease management, a significant focus area, benefits from electronic health records, care coordination models, and health information exchange.

Value-based care programs, predictive modeling healthcare, and telehealth platforms are transforming the landscape of healthcare delivery. Healthcare data analytics, interoperability standards, and population health dashboards facilitate data-driven decision-making, enhancing health intervention efficacy. Behavioral health integration and preventive health services are gaining prominence, with health literacy programs and clinical decision support tools supporting personalized medicine strategies. The market is expected to grow at a robust rate, with industry growth estimates reaching 15% annually. This growth is fueled by the ongoing need for healthcare cost reduction, quality improvement initiatives, and the integration of technology into healthcare delivery.

How is this Population Health Management Industry segmented?

The population health management industry research report provides comprehensive data (region-wise segment analysis), with forecasts and estimates in 'USD billion' for the period 2025-2029, as well as historical data from 2019-2023 for the following segments.

Component

  Software
  Services


End-user

  Large enterprises
  SMEs


Delivery Mode

  On-Premise
  Cloud-Based
  Web-Based


End-Use

  Providers
  Payers
  Employer Groups
  Government Bodies


Geography

  North America

    US
    Canada


  Europe

    France
    Germany
    Italy
    UK


  APAC

    China
    India
    Japan
    South Korea


  Rest of World (ROW)

By Component Insights

The software segment is estimated to witness significant growth during the forecast period.

The market's software segment is experiencing significant growth and innovation, driven by various components that enhance healthcare organizations' capacity to manage and enhance the health outcomes of diverse populations. Population health management platforms aggregate and integrate data from multiple sources, including electronic health records, claims data, and patient-generated data. Advanced analytics are employed to generate valuable insights, enabling healthcare providers to identify at-risk populations, address chronic conditions, and improve overall patient outcomes. These platforms facilitate seamless data exchange between stakeholders, ensuring harmonious care coordination and enhancing the overall effectiveness of healthcare services.

Request Free Sample

As of 2019

United States US: Completeness of Total Death Reporting data was reported at 97.543 % in 2008. This records an increase from the previous number of 96.305 % for 2007. United States US: Completeness of Total Death Reporting data is updated yearly, averaging 96.603 % from Dec 2006 (Median) to 2008, with 3 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 97.543 % in 2008 and a record low of 96.305 % in 2007. United States US: Completeness of Total Death Reporting data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s USA – Table US.World Bank.WDI: Health Statistics. Completeness of total death reporting is the number of total deaths reported by national statistics authorities to the United Nations Statistics Division's Demography Yearbook divided by the number of total deaths estimated by the United Nations Population Division.; ; The United Nations Statistics Division's Population and Vital Statistics Report and the United Nations Population Division's World Population Prospects.; Weighted average;

In the United States in 2021, the death rate was highest among those aged 85 and over, with about 17,190.5 men and 14,914.5 women per 100,000 of the population passing away. For all ages, the death rate was at 1,118.2 per 100,000 of the population for males, and 970.8 per 100,000 of the population for women. The death rate Death rates generally are counted as the number of deaths per 1,000 or 100,000 of the population and include both deaths of natural and unnatural causes. The death rate in the United States had pretty much held steady since 1990 until it started to increase over the last decade, with the highest death rates recorded in recent years. While the birth rate in the United States has been decreasing, it is still currently higher than the death rate. Causes of death There are a myriad number of causes of death in the United States, but the most recent data shows the top three leading causes of death to be heart disease, cancers, and accidents. Heart disease was also the leading cause of death worldwide.

Mappings of ICD9 and ICD10 codes to condensed set of causes of death, including garbage codes. (XLSX 1139 kb)

In 2023, about 17.7 percent of the American population was 65 years old or over; an increase from the last few years and a figure which is expected to reach 22.8 percent by 2050. This is a significant increase from 1950, when only eight percent of the population was 65 or over. A rapidly aging population In recent years, the aging population of the United States has come into focus as a cause for concern, as the nature of work and retirement is expected to change to keep up. If a population is expected to live longer than the generations before, the economy will have to change as well to fulfill the needs of the citizens. In addition, the birth rate in the U.S. has been falling over the last 20 years, meaning that there are not as many young people to replace the individuals leaving the workforce. The future population It’s not only the American population that is aging -- the global population is, too. By 2025, the median age of the global workforce is expected to be 39.6 years, up from 33.8 years in 1990. Additionally, it is projected that there will be over three million people worldwide aged 100 years and over by 2050.

About this dataset

Context

The dataset tabulates the United States population over the last 20 plus years. It lists the population for each year, along with the year on year change in population, as well as the change in percentage terms for each year. The dataset can be utilized to understand the population change of United States across the last two decades. For example, using this dataset, we can identify if the population is declining or increasing. If there is a change, when the population peaked, or if it is still growing and has not reached its peak. We can also compare the trend with the overall trend of United States population over the same period of time.

Key observations

In 2022, the population of United States was 333,287,557, a 0.38% increase year-by-year from 2021. Previously, in 2021, United States population was 332,031,554, an increase of 0.16% compared to a population of 331,511,512 in 2020. Over the last 20 plus years, between 2000 and 2022, population of United States increased by 51,125,146. In this period, the peak population was 333,287,557 in the year 2022. The numbers suggest that the population has not reached its peak yet and is showing a trend of further growth. Source: U.S. Census Bureau Population Estimates Program (PEP).

Content

When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau Population Estimates Program (PEP).

Data Coverage:

• From 2000 to 2022

Variables / Data Columns

• Year: This column displays the data year (Measured annually and for years 2000 to 2022)
• Population: The population for the specific year for the United States is shown in this column.
• Year on Year Change: This column displays the change in United States population for each year compared to the previous year.
• Change in Percent: This column displays the year on year change as a percentage. Please note that the sum of all percentages may not equal one due to rounding of values.

Good to know

Margin of Error

Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.

Custom data

If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.

Inspiration

Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.

Recommended for further research

This dataset is a part of the main dataset for United States Population by Year. You can refer the same here