This study contains selected electoral and aggregate economic, ecological, and demographic data at the congressional district level for districts of the 87th and 88th Congresses in the period 1961-1965. Data are provided for the number of votes cast for the Democratic and the Republican parties, and the percentage of votes cast for the majority party in the biennial elections for United States Representatives in the period 1952-1962, as well as the total votes cast for the office of president, and the number of votes cast for each party's presidential candidate in the 1952, 1956, and 1960 election. Data are also provided for population and housing characteristics, including total population by household, group quarters, institutions, age group, gender, marital status, race, nationality, and urban and rural residency. Additional demographic variables describe the congressional districts in terms of education, income, employment status and occupation, veteran status, births, deaths, and marriages.

US Census American Community Survey (ACS) 2015, 5-year estimates of the key economic characteristics of Congressional Districts (114th US Congress) geographic level in Orange County, California. The data contains 397 fields for the variable groups E01: Employment status (universe: population 16 years and over, table X23, 7 fields); E02: Work status by age of worker (universe: population 16 years and over, table X23, 36 fields); E03: Commuting to work (universe: workers 16 years and over, table X8, 8 fields); E04: Travel time to work (universe: workers 16 years and over who did not work at home, table X8, 14 fields); E05: Number of vehicles available for workers (universe: workers 16 years and over in households, table X8, 8 fields); E06: Median age by means of transportation to work (universe: median age, workers 16 years and over, table X8, 7 fields); E07: Means of transportation to work by race (universe: workers 16 years and over, table X8, 64 fields); E08: Occupation (universe: civilian employed population 16 years and over, table X24, 53 fields); E09: Industry (universe: civilian employed population 16 years and over, table X24, 43 fields); E10: Class of worker (universe: civilian employed population 16 years and over, table X24, 19 fields); E11: Household income and earnings in the past 12 months (universe: total households, table X19, 37 fields); E12: Income and earnings in dollars (universe: inflation-adjusted dollars, tables X19-X20, 31 fields); E13: Family income in dollars (universe: total families, table X19, 17 fields); E14: Health insurance coverage (universe: total families, table X19, 17 fields); E15: Ratio of income to Poverty level (universe: total population for whom Poverty level is determined, table X17, 8 fields); E16: Poverty in population in the past 12 months (universe: total population for whom Poverty level is determined, table X17, 7 fields); E17: Poverty in households in the past 12 months (universe: total households, table X17, 9 fields); E18: Percentage of families and people whose income in the past 12 months is below the poverty level (universe: families, population, table X17, 8 fields), and; X19: Poverty and income deficit (dollars) in the past 12 months for families (universe: families with income below Poverty level in the past 12 months, table X17, 4 fields). The US Census geodemographic data are based on the 2015 TigerLines across multiple geographies. The spatial geographies were merged with ACS data tables. See full documentation at the OCACS project github page (https://github.com/ktalexan/OCACS-Geodemographics).

Active borrower characteristics aggregated at the Congressional District level of geography, including number of borrowers, income levels, race, ethnicity, marital status, number of children in household, and average household size.

District-level demographics (age, sex, education, household income, poverty) derived from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year estimates. Searchable by ZIP, state, and district with on-page charts.

This map shows median age in the US by country, state, county, tract, and congressional district for 2023. ArcGIS Online account required for use.The pop-up is configured to show median age, median age by sex, child age (under 18) population, senior age (over 65) population, the age dependency ratio, and population by 5 year age increments. Blending is used at the Tract level to highlight areas of human settlement. Congressional district is turned off by default and can be enabled in the Layers pane.Esri 2023 Age Dependency Ratio is the estimated ratio of the child population (Age 0-17) and senior population (Age 65+) to the working-age population (Age 18-64) in the geographic area. This ratio is then multiplied by 100. Higher ratios denote that a greater burden is carried by working-age people. Lower ratios mean more people are working who can support the dependent population. Read more. See Updated Demographics for more information on Esri Demographic variables.Esri Updated Demographics represent the suite of annually updated U.S. demographic data that provides current-year and five-year forecasts for more than two thousand demographic and socioeconomic characteristics, a subset of which is included in this layer. Included are a host of tables covering key characteristics of the population, households, housing, age, race, income, and much more. Esri's Updated Demographics data consists of point estimates, representing July 1 of the current and forecast years.Get started with U.S. Updated DemographicsHow to use and interpret U.S. Updated DemographicsEsri Updated Demographics DocumentationMethodologyEssential Esri Demographics vocabularyThis ready-to-use layer can be used within ArcGIS Pro, ArcGIS Online, its configurable apps, dashboards, Story Maps, custom apps, and mobile apps. This layer requires an ArcGIS Online subscription and does not consume credits. Please cite Esri when using this data. For information about purchasing additional Esri's Updated Demographics data, contact datasales@esri.com. Feedback: we would like to hear from you while this layer is in beta release. If you have any feedback regarding this item or Esri Demographics, please use this survey. Fields available:GEOIDNameState NameState Abbreviation2023 Total Population (Esri)2023 Household Population (Esri)2023 Group Quarters Population (Esri)2023 Population Density (Pop per Square Mile) (Esri)2023 Total Households (Esri)2023 Average Household Size (Esri)2023 Total Housing Units (Esri)2023 Owner Occupied Housing Units (Esri)2023 Renter Occupied Housing Units (Esri)2023 Vacant Housing Units (Esri)2020-2023 Population: Compound Annual Growth Rate (Esri)2020-2023 Households: Compound Annual Growth Rate (Esri)2023 Housing Affordability Index (Esri)2023 Percent of Income for Mortgage (Esri)2023 Wealth Index (Esri)2023 Socioeconomic Status Index (Esri)2023 Generation Alpha Population (Born 2017 or Later) (Esri)2023 Generation Z Population (Born 1999 to 2016) (Esri)2023 Millennial Population (Born 1981 to 1998) (Esri)2023 Generation X Population (Born 1965 to 1980) (Esri)2023 Baby Boomer Population (Born 1946 to 1964) (Esri)2023 Silent & Greatest Generations Population (Born 1945/Earlier) (Esri)2023 Population by Generation Base (Esri)2023 Child Population (Age <18) (Esri)2023 Working-Age Population (Age 18-64) (Esri)2023 Senior Population (Age 65+) (Esri)2023 Child Dependency Ratio (Esri)2023 Age Dependency Ratio (Esri)2023 Senior Dependency Ratio (Esri)2023 Total Population Age 0-4 (Esri)2023 Total Population Age 5-9 (Esri)2023 Total Population Age 10-14 (Esri)2023 Total Population Age 15-19 (Esri)2023 Total Population Age 20-24 (Esri)2023 Total Population Age 25-29 (Esri)2023 Total Population Age 30-34 (Esri)2023 Total Population Age 35-39 (Esri)2023 Total Population Age 40-44 (Esri)2023 Total Population Age 45-49 (Esri)2023 Total Population Age 50-54 (Esri)2023 Total Population Age 55-59 (Esri)2023 Total Population Age 60-64 (Esri)2023 Total Population Age 65-69 (Esri)2023 Total Population Age 70-74 (Esri)2023 Total Population Age 75-79 (Esri)2023 Total Population Age 80-84 (Esri)2023 Total Population Age 85+ (Esri)2023 Median Age (Esri)2023 Male Population (Esri)2023 Median Male Age (Esri)2023 Female Population (Esri)2023 Median Female Age (Esri)2023 Total Population by Five-Year Age Base (Esri)2023 Total Daytime Population (Esri)2023 Daytime Population: Workers (Esri)2023 Daytime Population: Residents (Esri)2023 Daytime Population Density (Pop per Square Mile) (Esri)2023 Civilian Population Age 16+ in Labor Force (Esri)2023 Employed Civilian Population Age 16+ (Esri)2023 Unemployed Population Age 16+ (Esri)2023 Unemployment Rate (Esri)2023 Civilian Population 16-24 in Labor Force (Esri)2023 Employed Civilian Population Age 16-24 (Esri)2023 Unemployed Population Age 16-24 (Esri)2023 Unemployment Rate: Population Age 16-24 (Esri)2023 Civilian Population 25-54 in Labor Force (Esri)2023 Employed Civilian Population Age 25-54 (Esri)2023 Unemployed Population Age 25-54 (Esri)2023 Unemployment Rate: Population Age 25-54 (Esri)2023 Civilian Population 55-64 in Labor Force (Esri)2023 Employed Civilian Population Age 55-64 (Esri)2023 Unemployed Population Age 55-64 (Esri)2023 Unemployment Rate: Population Age 55-64 (Esri)2023 Civilian Population 65+ in Labor Force (Esri)2023 Employed Civilian Population Age 65+ (Esri)2023 Unemployed Population Age 65+ (Esri)2023 Unemployment Rate: Population Age 65+ (Esri)2023 Child Economic Dependency Ratio (Esri)2023 Working-Age Economic Dependency Ratio (Esri)2023 Senior Economic Dependency Ratio (Esri)2023 Economic Dependency Ratio (Esri)2023 Hispanic Population (Esri)2023 White Non-Hispanic Population (Esri)2023 Black/African American Non-Hispanic Population (Esri)2023 American Indian/Alaska Native Non-Hispanic Population (Esri)2023 Asian Non-Hispanic Population (Esri)2023 Pacific Islander Non-Hispanic Population (Esri)2023 Other Race Non-Hispanic Population (Esri)2023 Multiple Races Non-Hispanic Population (Esri)2023 Diversity Index (Esri)2023 Population by Race Base (Esri)2023 Population Age 25+: Less than 9th Grade (Esri)2023 Population Age 25+: 9-12th Grade/No Diploma (Esri)2023 Population Age 25+: High School Diploma (Esri)2023 Population Age 25+: GED/Alternative Credential (Esri)2023 Population Age 25+: Some College/No Degree (Esri)2023 Population Age 25+: Associate's Degree (Esri)2023 Population Age 25+: Bachelor's Degree (Esri)2023 Population Age 25+: Graduate/Professional Degree (Esri)2023 Educational Attainment Base (Pop 25+)(Esri)2023 Household Income less than $15,000 (Esri)2023 Household Income $15,000-$24,999 (Esri)2023 Household Income $25,000-$34,999 (Esri)2023 Household Income $35,000-$49,999 (Esri)2023 Household Income $50,000-$74,999 (Esri)2023 Household Income $75,000-$99,999 (Esri)2023 Household Income $100,000-$149,999 (Esri)2023 Household Income $150,000-$199,999 (Esri)2023 Household Income $200,000 or greater (Esri)2023 Median Household Income (Esri)2023 Average Household Income (Esri)2023 Per Capita Income (Esri)2023 Households by Income Base (Esri)2023 Gini Index (Esri)2023 P90-P10 Ratio of Income Inequality (Esri)2023 P90-P50 Ratio of Income Inequality (Esri)2023 P50-P10 Ratio of Income Inequality (Esri)2023 80-20 Share Ratio of Income Inequality (Esri)2023 90-40 Share Ratio of Income Inequality (Esri)2023 Households in Low Income Tier (Esri)2023 Households in Middle Income Tier (Esri)2023 Households in Upper Income Tier (Esri)2023 Disposable Income less than $15,000 (Esri)2023 Disposable Income $15,000-$24,999 (Esri)2023 Disposable Income $25,000-$34,999 (Esri)2023 Disposable Income $35,000-$49,999 (Esri)2023 Disposable Income $50,000-$74,999 (Esri)2023 Disposable Income $75,000-$99,999 (Esri)2023 Disposable Income $100,000-$149,999 (Esri)2023 Disposable Income $150,000-$199,999 (Esri)2023 Disposable Income $200,000 or greater (Esri)2023 Median Disposable Income (Esri)2023 Home Value less than $50,000 (Esri)2023 Home Value $50,000-$99,999 (Esri)2023 Home Value $100,000-$149,999 (Esri)2023 Home Value $150,000-$199,999 (Esri)2023 Home Value $200,000-$249,999 (Esri)2023 Home Value $250,000-$299,999 (Esri)2023 Home Value $300,000-$399,999 (Esri)2023 Home Value $400,000-$499,999 (Esri)2023 Home Value $500,000-$749,999 (Esri)2023 Home Value $750,000-$999,999 (Esri)2023 Home Value $1,000,000-$1,499,999 (Esri)2023 Home Value $1,500,000-$1,999,999 (Esri)2023 Home Value $2,000,000 or greater (Esri)2023 Median Home Value (Esri)2023 Average Home Value (Esri)2028 Total Population (Esri)2028 Household Population (Esri)2028 Population Density (Pop per Square Mile) (Esri)2028 Total Households (Esri)2028 Average Household Size (Esri)2023-2028 Population: Compound Annual Growth Rate (Esri)2023-2028 Households: Compound Annual Growth Rate (Esri)2023-2028 Per Capita Income: Compound Annual Growth Rate (Esri)2023-2028 Median Household Income: Compound Annual Growth Rate (Esri)2028 Diversity Index (Esri)2028 Median Household Income (Esri)2028 Average Household Income (Esri)2028 Per Capita Income (Esri)

US Census American Community Survey (ACS) 2017, 5-year estimates of the key economic characteristics of Congressional Districts (115th US Congress) geographic level in Orange County, California. The data contains 397 fields for the variable groups E01: Employment status (universe: population 16 years and over, table X23, 7 fields); E02: Work status by age of worker (universe: population 16 years and over, table X23, 36 fields); E03: Commuting to work (universe: workers 16 years and over, table X8, 8 fields); E04: Travel time to work (universe: workers 16 years and over who did not work at home, table X8, 14 fields); E05: Number of vehicles available for workers (universe: workers 16 years and over in households, table X8, 8 fields); E06: Median age by means of transportation to work (universe: median age, workers 16 years and over, table X8, 7 fields); E07: Means of transportation to work by race (universe: workers 16 years and over, table X8, 64 fields); E08: Occupation (universe: civilian employed population 16 years and over, table X24, 53 fields); E09: Industry (universe: civilian employed population 16 years and over, table X24, 43 fields); E10: Class of worker (universe: civilian employed population 16 years and over, table X24, 19 fields); E11: Household income and earnings in the past 12 months (universe: total households, table X19, 37 fields); E12: Income and earnings in dollars (universe: inflation-adjusted dollars, tables X19-X20, 31 fields); E13: Family income in dollars (universe: total families, table X19, 17 fields); E14: Health insurance coverage (universe: total families, table X19, 17 fields); E15: Ratio of income to Poverty level (universe: total population for whom Poverty level is determined, table X17, 8 fields); E16: Poverty in population in the past 12 months (universe: total population for whom Poverty level is determined, table X17, 7 fields); E17: Poverty in households in the past 12 months (universe: total households, table X17, 9 fields); E18: Percentage of families and people whose income in the past 12 months is below the poverty level (universe: families, population, table X17, 8 fields), and; X19: Poverty and income deficit (dollars) in the past 12 months for families (universe: families with income below Poverty level in the past 12 months, table X17, 4 fields). The US Census geodemographic data are based on the 2017 TigerLines across multiple geographies. The spatial geographies were merged with ACS data tables. See full documentation at the OCACS project github page (https://github.com/ktalexan/OCACS-Geodemographics).

The TIGER/Line Files are shapefiles and related database files (.dbf) that are an extract of selected geographic and cartographic information from the U.S. Census Bureau's Master Address File / Topologically Integrated Geographic Encoding and Referencing (MAF/TIGER) Database (MTDB). The MTDB represents a seamless national file with no overlaps or gaps between parts, however, each TIGER/Line File is designed to stand alone as an independent data set, or they can be combined to cover the entire nation. Block Groups (BGs) are defined before tabulation block delineation and numbering, but are clusters of blocks within the same census tract that have the same first digit of their 4-digit census block number from the same decennial census. For example, Census 2000 tabulation blocks 3001, 3002, 3003,.., 3999 within Census 2000 tract 1210.02 are also within BG 3 within that census tract. Census 2000 BGs generally contained between 600 and 3,000 people, with an optimum size of 1,500 people. Most BGs were delineated by local participants in the Census Bureau's Participant Statistical Areas Program (PSAP). The Census Bureau delineated BGs only where the PSAP participant declined to delineate BGs or where the Census Bureau could not identify any local PSAP participant. A BG usually covers a contiguous area. Each census tract contains at least one BG, and BGs are uniquely numbered within census tract. Within the standard census geographic hierarchy, BGs never cross county or census tract boundaries, but may cross the boundaries of other geographic entities like county subdivisions, places, urban areas, voting districts, congressional districts, and American Indian / Alaska Native / Native Hawaiian areas. BGs have a valid code range of 0 through 9. BGs coded 0 were intended to only include water area, no land area, and they are generally in territorial seas, coastal water, and Great Lakes water areas. For Census 2000, rather than extending a census tract boundary into the Great Lakes or out to the U.S. nautical three-mile limit, the Census Bureau delineated some census tract boundaries along the shoreline or just offshore. The Census Bureau assigned a default census tract number of 0 and BG of 0 to these offshore, water-only areas not included in regularly numbered census tract areas.

This table contains data on household income and poverty status from the American Community Survey 2006-2010 database for block groups. The American Community Survey (ACS) is a household survey conducted by the U.S. Census Bureau that currently has an annual sample size of about 3.5 million addresses. ACS estimates provides communities with the current information they need to plan investments and services. Information from the survey generates estimates that help determine how more than $400 billion in federal and state funds are distributed annually. Each year the survey produces data that cover the periods of 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year estimates for geographic areas in the United States and Puerto Rico, ranging from neighborhoods to Congressional districts to the entire nation. This table also has a companion table (Same table name with MOE Suffix) with the margin of error (MOE) values for each estimated element. MOE is expressed as a measure value for each estimated element. So a value of 25 and an MOE of 5 means 25 +/- 5 (or statistical certainty between 20 and 30). There are also special cases of MOE. An MOE of -1 means the associated estimates do not have a measured error. An MOE of 0 means that error calculation is not appropriate for the associated value. An MOE of 109 is set whenever an estimate value is 0. The MOEs of aggregated elements and percentages must be calculated. This process means using standard error calculations as described in "American Community Survey Multiyear Accuracy of the Data (3-year 2008-2010 and 5-year 2006-2010)". Also, following Census guidelines, aggregated MOEs do not use more than 1 0-element MOE (109) to prevent over estimation of the error. Due to the complexity of the calculations, some percentage MOEs cannot be calculated (these are set to null in the summary-level MOE tables).

The name for table 'ACS10INCBGMOE' was added as a prefix to all field names imported from that table. Be sure to turn off 'Show Field Aliases' to see complete field names in the Attribute Table of this feature layer. This can be done in the 'Table Options' drop-down menu in the Attribute Table or with key sequence '[CTRL]+[SHIFT]+N'. Due to database restrictions, the prefix may have been abbreviated if the field name exceded the maximum allowed characters.

The TIGER/Line Files are shapefiles and related database files (.dbf) that are an extract of selected geographic and cartographic information from the U.S. Census Bureau's Master Address File / Topologically Integrated Geographic Encoding and Referencing (MAF/TIGER) Database (MTDB). The MTDB represents a seamless national file with no overlaps or gaps between parts, however, each TIGER/Line File is designed to stand alone as an independent data set, or they can be combined to cover the entire nation. The primary legal divisions of most States are termed counties. In Louisiana, these divisions are known as parishes. In Alaska, which has no counties, the equivalent entities are the organized boroughs, city and boroughs, and municipalities, and for the unorganized area, census areas. The latter are delineated cooperatively for statistical purposes by the State of Alaska and the Census Bureau. In four States (Maryland, Missouri, Nevada, and Virginia), there are one or more incorporated places that are independent of any county organization and thus constitute primary divisions of their States. These incorporated places are known as independent cities and are treated as equivalent entities for purposes of data presentation. The District of Columbia and Guam have no primary divisions, and each area is considered an equivalent entity for purposes of data presentation. The Census Bureau treats the following entities as equivalents of counties for purposes of data presentation: Municipios in Puerto Rico, Districts and Islands in American Samoa, Municipalities in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and Islands in the U.S. Virgin Islands. The entire area of the United States, Puerto Rico, and the Island Areas is covered by counties or equivalent entities. The 2010 Census boundaries for counties and equivalent entities are as of January 1, 2010, primarily as reported through the Census Bureau's Boundary and Annexation Survey (BAS).

This table contains data on household income and poverty status from the American Community Survey 2006-2010 database for counties. The American Community Survey (ACS) is a household survey conducted by the U.S. Census Bureau that currently has an annual sample size of about 3.5 million addresses. ACS estimates provides communities with the current information they need to plan investments and services. Information from the survey generates estimates that help determine how more than $400 billion in federal and state funds are distributed annually. Each year the survey produces data that cover the periods of 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year estimates for geographic areas in the United States and Puerto Rico, ranging from neighborhoods to Congressional districts to the entire nation. This table also has a companion table (Same table name with MOE Suffix) with the margin of error (MOE) values for each estimated element. MOE is expressed as a measure value for each estimated element. So a value of 25 and an MOE of 5 means 25 +/- 5 (or statistical certainty between 20 and 30). There are also special cases of MOE. An MOE of -1 means the associated estimates do not have a measured error. An MOE of 0 means that error calculation is not appropriate for the associated value. An MOE of 109 is set whenever an estimate value is 0. The MOEs of aggregated elements and percentages must be calculated. This process means using standard error calculations as described in "American Community Survey Multiyear Accuracy of the Data (3-year 2008-2010 and 5-year 2006-2010)". Also, following Census guidelines, aggregated MOEs do not use more than 1 0-element MOE (109) to prevent over estimation of the error. Due to the complexity of the calculations, some percentage MOEs cannot be calculated (these are set to null in the summary-level MOE tables).

The name for table 'ACS10INCCNTYMOE' was added as a prefix to all field names imported from that table. Be sure to turn off 'Show Field Aliases' to see complete field names in the Attribute Table of this feature layer. This can be done in the 'Table Options' drop-down menu in the Attribute Table or with key sequence '[CTRL]+[SHIFT]+N'. Due to database restrictions, the prefix may have been abbreviated if the field name exceded the maximum allowed characters.

Old-Age (retirement), Survivors, and Disability Insurance (OASDI) popularly referred to as Social Security provides monthly benefits to workers and their families when earnings stop or are reduced because the worker retires, dies, or becomes disabled. The amount of benefits received is based on the worker's level of earnings in employment or self-employment covered by the Social Security program. Report for 2002.

This is a copy of the statewide Census Block Group GIS Tiger file. The IRWM web based EDA mapping tool uses this GIS layer. Created by joining ACS 2019-2023 5 year estimates to the 2020 Census Tract feature class. The TIGER/Line Files are shapefiles and related database files (.dbf) that are an extract of selected geographic and cartographic information from the U.S. Census Bureau's Master Address File / Topologically Integrated Geographic Encoding and Referencing (MAF/TIGER) Database (MTDB). The MTDB represents a seamless national file with no overlaps or gaps between parts, however, each TIGER/Line File is designed to stand alone as an independent data set, or they can be combined to cover the entire nation. Block Groups (BGs) are defined before tabulation block delineation and numbering, but are clusters of blocks within the same census tract that have the same first digit of their 4-digit census block number from the same decennial census. For example, Census 2020 tabulation blocks 3001, 3002, 3003,.., 3999 within Census 2020 tract 1210.02 are also within BG 3 within that census tract. Census 2020 BGs generally contained between 600 and 3,000 people, with an optimum size of 1,500 people. Most BGs were delineated by local participants in the Census Bureau's Participant Statistical Areas Program (PSAP). The Census Bureau delineated BGs only where the PSAP participant declined to delineate BGs or where the Census Bureau could not identify any local PSAP participant. A BG usually covers a contiguous area. Each census tract contains at least one BG, and BGs are uniquely numbered within census tract. Within the standard census geographic hierarchy, BGs never cross county or census tract boundaries, but may cross the boundaries of other geographic entities like county subdivisions, places, urban areas, voting districts, congressional districts, and American Indian / Alaska Native / Native Hawaiian areas. BGs have a valid code range of 0 through 9. BGs coded 0 were intended to only include water area, no land area, and they are generally in territorial seas, coastal water, and Great Lakes water areas. For Census 2020, rather than extending a census tract boundary into the Great Lakes or out to the U.S. nautical three-mile limit, the Census Bureau delineated some census tract boundaries along the shoreline or just offshore. The Census Bureau assigned a default census tract number of 0 and BG of 0 to these offshore, water-only areas not included in regularly numbered census tract areas.

This poll, fielded October 25-28, 2010, is part of a continuing series of monthly surveys that solicit public opinion on the presidency and on a range of other political and social issues. Respondents were asked whether they approved of the way Barack Obama was handling the presidency and the economy, how closely they were following the congressional election, what the chances were that they would vote in the upcoming congressional election, which party they would vote for in their congressional district, whether they normally vote in mid-term elections, whether they were inclined to vote to re-elect their representative in Congress, and whether or not they thought it would be a good thing if control of Congress switched from the Democrats to the Republicans after the November elections. Information was collected on whether respondents approved of the way the United States Congress was doing its job, whether they had a favorable or unfavorable impression of Nancy Pelosi and John Boehner, which party they trusted more to do a better job in coping with the main problems the nation faces over the next few years, which political party they trusted to do a better job handling the economy, and whether they thought that things in this country were generally going in the right direction. Respondents were queried on what they thought was a bigger risk, the Democrats putting in place too many government regulations or the Republicans not putting enough government regulations in place, whether they favored smaller government with fewer services or larger government with more services, and whether they had recently been contacted by an organization working in support of a candidate for Congress, asking for their vote. Respondents were also asked how they would describe the state of the nation's economy, whether they thought the economy was getting better or worse, whether they supported the political movement known as the Tea Party, whether they had a favorable or unfavorable impression of Sarah Palin and whether they thought Palin was qualified to serve as president. Finally, respondents were asked how important they thought it was to know who pays for campaign advertisements, who they would vote for if the candidates for president were Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert, and whether they favored or opposed legalizing the possession of small amounts of marijuana for personal use. Demographic variables include sex, age, race, marital status, household income, education level, political party affiliation, political philosophy, political ideology, religious preference, union membership, and whether the respondent is a born-again Christian.

Abstract (en): This poll, fielded February, 2012, and the first of two, is part of a continuing series of monthly surveys that solicits public opinion on a range of political and social issues. Respondents were asked whether they approved of the way Barack Obama was handling his job as president, foreign policy, the economy, the situation in Afghanistan, job creation, and the federal budget deficit. Respondents were also asked whether they approved of Congress, about the condition of the economy, and whether things in the country were on the right track. Multiple questions addressed the 2012 Republican presidential candidates, including respondents' overall opinions of several of the candidates and their policies. Respondents were asked what issues and qualities were most important in deciding who to support for the Republican nomination, what topics they would like to hear them discuss, as well as the Tea Party movement and the amount of influence they have in the Republican Party. Additionally, respondents were questioned whether they voted in the 2008 presidential election and who they voted for, whether they voted or plan to vote in a Democratic or Republican 2012 primary or caucus, their first and second choice for the 2012 Republican nomination for president, which candidate would have the best chance of winning against Barack Obama, and who they would vote for in the 2012 presidential election. Other topics include the housing market, the federal budget deficit, birth control, same-sex marriage, and illegal immigrants. Demographic variables include sex, age, race, education level, household income, religious preference, type of residential area (e.g., urban or rural), whether respondents thought of themselves as born-again Christians, marital status, number of people in the household between the ages of 18 and 29, political party affiliation, political philosophy, and voter registration status. The data contain a weight variable that should be used in analyzing the data. According to the CBS News Web site, the data were weighted to match United States Census Bureau breakdowns on age, sex, race, education, and region of the country. The data were also adjusted for the fact that people who share a telephone with others have less chance to be contacted than people who live alone and have their own telephones, and that households with more than one telephone number have more chances to be called than households with only one telephone number. ICPSR data undergo a confidentiality review and are altered when necessary to limit the risk of disclosure. ICPSR also routinely creates ready-to-go data files along with setups in the major statistical software formats as well as standard codebooks to accompany the data. In addition to these procedures, ICPSR performed the following processing steps for this data collection: Checked for undocumented or out-of-range codes.. Persons aged 18 years and older living in households with telephones in the United States. Smallest Geographic Unit: congressional district A variation of random-digit dialing (RDD) using primary sampling units (PSUs) was employed, consisting of blocks of 100 telephone numbers identical through the eighth digit and stratified by geographic region, area code, and size of place. Phone numbers were dialed from RDD samples of both standard land-lines and cell phones. Within households, respondents were selected using a method developed by Leslie Kish and modified by Charles Backstrom and Gerald Hursh (see Backstrom and Hursh, SURVEY RESEARCH. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1963). telephone interview

In this paper, we explore the effects of district level social and economic variables on representation biases in Congressional representation. We provide simulated data that supports the view that lower-income constituents are better represented in districts that have high levels of electoral competition and low median incomes. We then show that the relationship holds when we recreate the model using Americans for Democratic Action (ADA) scores instead of DW-NOMINATE scores as a measure of ideological distance.

US Census American Community Survey (ACS) 2019, 5-year estimates of the key economic characteristics of Congressional Districts (116th US Congress) geographic level in Orange County, California. The data contains 397 fields for the variable groups E01: Employment status (universe: population 16 years and over, table X23, 7 fields); E02: Work status by age of worker (universe: population 16 years and over, table X23, 36 fields); E03: Commuting to work (universe: workers 16 years and over, table X8, 8 fields); E04: Travel time to work (universe: workers 16 years and over who did not work at home, table X8, 14 fields); E05: Number of vehicles available for workers (universe: workers 16 years and over in households, table X8, 8 fields); E06: Median age by means of transportation to work (universe: median age, workers 16 years and over, table X8, 7 fields); E07: Means of transportation to work by race (universe: workers 16 years and over, table X8, 64 fields); E08: Occupation (universe: civilian employed population 16 years and over, table X24, 53 fields); E09: Industry (universe: civilian employed population 16 years and over, table X24, 43 fields); E10: Class of worker (universe: civilian employed population 16 years and over, table X24, 19 fields); E11: Household income and earnings in the past 12 months (universe: total households, table X19, 37 fields); E12: Income and earnings in dollars (universe: inflation-adjusted dollars, tables X19-X20, 31 fields); E13: Family income in dollars (universe: total families, table X19, 17 fields); E14: Health insurance coverage (universe: total families, table X19, 17 fields); E15: Ratio of income to Poverty level (universe: total population for whom Poverty level is determined, table X17, 8 fields); E16: Poverty in population in the past 12 months (universe: total population for whom Poverty level is determined, table X17, 7 fields); E17: Poverty in households in the past 12 months (universe: total households, table X17, 9 fields); E18: Percentage of families and people whose income in the past 12 months is below the poverty level (universe: families, population, table X17, 8 fields), and; X19: Poverty and income deficit (dollars) in the past 12 months for families (universe: families with income below Poverty level in the past 12 months, table X17, 4 fields). The US Census geodemographic data are based on the 2019 TigerLines across multiple geographies. The spatial geographies were merged with ACS data tables. See full documentation at the OCACS project github page (https://github.com/ktalexan/OCACS-Geodemographics).

This dataset was developed by the Research & Analytics Group at the Atlanta Regional Commission using data from the U.S. Census Bureau across all standard and custom geographies at statewide summary level where applicable. For a deep dive into the data model including every specific metric, see the ACS 2017-2021 Data Manifest. The manifest details ARC-defined naming conventions, field names/descriptions and topics, summary levels; source tables; notes and so forth for all metrics. Find naming convention prefixes/suffixes, geography definitions and user notes below.Prefixes:NoneCountpPercentrRatemMedianaMean (average)tAggregate (total)chChange in absolute terms (value in t2 - value in t1)pchPercent change ((value in t2 - value in t1) / value in t1)chpChange in percent (percent in t2 - percent in t1)sSignificance flag for change: 1 = statistically significant with a 90% CI, 0 = not statistically significant, blank = cannot be computedSuffixes:_e21Estimate from 2017-21 ACS_m21Margin of Error from 2017-21 ACS_e102006-10 ACS, re-estimated to 2020 geography_m10Margin of Error from 2006-10 ACS, re-estimated to 2020 geography_e10_21Change, 2010-21 (holding constant at 2020 geography)GeographiesAAA = Area Agency on Aging (12 geographic units formed from counties providing statewide coverage)ARC21 = Atlanta Regional Commission modeling area (21 counties merged to a single geographic unit)ARWDB7 = Atlanta Regional Workforce Development Board (7 counties merged to a single geographic unit)BeltLine (buffer)BeltLine Study (subareas)Census Tract (statewide)CFGA23 = Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta (23 counties merged to a single geographic unit)City (statewide)City of Atlanta Council Districts (City of Atlanta)City of Atlanta Neighborhood Planning Unit (City of Atlanta)City of Atlanta Neighborhood Planning Unit STV (3 NPUs merged to a single geographic unit within City of Atlanta)City of Atlanta Neighborhood Statistical Areas (City of Atlanta)City of Atlanta Neighborhood Statistical Areas E02E06 (2 NSAs merged to single geographic unit within City of Atlanta)County (statewide)Georgia House (statewide)Georgia Senate (statewide)MetroWater15 = Atlanta Metropolitan Water District (15 counties merged to a single geographic unit)Regional Commissions (statewide)SPARCC = Strong, Prosperous And Resilient Communities ChallengeState of Georgia (single geographic unit)Superdistrict (ARC region)US Congress (statewide)UWGA13 = United Way of Greater Atlanta (13 counties merged to a single geographic unit)WFF = Westside Future Fund (subarea of City of Atlanta)ZIP Code Tabulation Areas (statewide)The user should note that American Community Survey data represent estimates derived from a surveyed sample of the population, which creates some level of uncertainty, as opposed to an exact measure of the entire population (the full census count is only conducted once every 10 years and does not cover as many detailed characteristics of the population). Therefore, any measure reported by ACS should not be taken as an exact number – this is why a corresponding margin of error (MOE) is also given for ACS measures. The size of the MOE relative to its corresponding estimate value provides an indication of confidence in the accuracy of each estimate. Each MOE is expressed in the same units as its corresponding measure; for example, if the estimate value is expressed as a number, then its MOE will also be a number; if the estimate value is expressed as a percent, then its MOE will also be a percent. The user should also note that for relatively small geographic areas, such as census tracts shown here, ACS only releases combined 5-year estimates, meaning these estimates represent rolling averages of survey results that were collected over a 5-year span (in this case 2017-2021). Therefore, these data do not represent any one specific point in time or even one specific year. For geographic areas with larger populations, 3-year and 1-year estimates are also available. For further explanation of ACS estimates and margin of error, visit Census ACS website.Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Atlanta Regional CommissionDate: 2017-2021Data License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC by 4.0)Link to the data manifest: https://garc.maps.arcgis.com/sharing/rest/content/items/34b9adfdcc294788ba9c70bf433bd4c1/data

These data were developed by the Research & Analytics Group at the Atlanta Regional Commission using data from the U.S. Census Bureau across all standard and custom geographies at statewide summary level where applicable. .
For a deep dive into the data model including every specific metric, see the ACS 2018-2022 Data Manifest. The manifest details ARC-defined naming conventions, field names/descriptions and topics, summary levels; source tables; notes and so forth for all metrics. Find naming convention prefixes/suffixes, geography definitions and user notes below.Prefixes:NoneCountpPercentrRatemMedianaMean (average)tAggregate (total)chChange in absolute terms (value in t2 - value in t1)pchPercent change ((value in t2 - value in t1) / value in t1)chpChange in percent (percent in t2 - percent in t1)sSignificance flag for change: 1 = statistically significant with a 90% CI, 0 = not statistically significant, blank = cannot be computedSuffixes:_e22Estimate from 2018-22 ACS_m22Margin of Error from 2018-22 ACS_e102006-10 ACS, re-estimated to 2020 geography_m10Margin of Error from 2006-10 ACS, re-estimated to 2020 geography_e10_22Change, 2010-22 (holding constant at 2020 geography)GeographiesAAA = Area Agency on Aging (12 geographic units formed from counties providing statewide coverage)ARC21 = Atlanta Regional Commission modeling area (21 counties merged to a single geographic unit)ARWDB7 = Atlanta Regional Workforce Development Board (7 counties merged to a single geographic unit)BeltLineStatistical (buffer)BeltLineStatisticalSub (subareas)Census Tract (statewide)CFGA23 = Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta (23 counties merged to a single geographic unit)City (statewide)City of Atlanta Council Districts (City of Atlanta)City of Atlanta Neighborhood Planning Unit (City of Atlanta)City of Atlanta Neighborhood Statistical Areas (City of Atlanta)County (statewide)Georgia House (statewide)Georgia Senate (statewide)HSSA = High School Statistical Area (11 county region)MetroWater15 = Atlanta Metropolitan Water District (15 counties merged to a single geographic unit)Regional Commissions (statewide)State of Georgia (single geographic unit)Superdistrict (ARC region)US Congress (statewide)UWGA13 = United Way of Greater Atlanta (13 counties merged to a single geographic unit)ZIP Code Tabulation Areas (statewide)The user should note that American Community Survey data represent estimates derived from a surveyed sample of the population, which creates some level of uncertainty, as opposed to an exact measure of the entire population (the full census count is only conducted once every 10 years and does not cover as many detailed characteristics of the population). Therefore, any measure reported by ACS should not be taken as an exact number – this is why a corresponding margin of error (MOE) is also given for ACS measures. The size of the MOE relative to its corresponding estimate value provides an indication of confidence in the accuracy of each estimate. Each MOE is expressed in the same units as its corresponding measure; for example, if the estimate value is expressed as a number, then its MOE will also be a number; if the estimate value is expressed as a percent, then its MOE will also be a percent. The user should also note that for relatively small geographic areas, such as census tracts shown here, ACS only releases combined 5-year estimates, meaning these estimates represent rolling averages of survey results that were collected over a 5-year span (in this case 2018-2022). Therefore, these data do not represent any one specific point in time or even one specific year. For geographic areas with larger populations, 3-year and 1-year estimates are also available. For further explanation of ACS estimates and margin of error, visit Census ACS website.Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Atlanta Regional CommissionDate: 2018-2022Data License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC by 4.0)Link to the data manifest: https://opendata.atlantaregional.com/documents/3b86ee614e614199ba66a3ff1ebfe3b5/about

US Census American Community Survey (ACS) 2016, 5-year estimates of the key economic characteristics of Congressional Districts (115th US Congress) geographic level in Orange County, California. The data contains 397 fields for the variable groups E01: Employment status (universe: population 16 years and over, table X23, 7 fields); E02: Work status by age of worker (universe: population 16 years and over, table X23, 36 fields); E03: Commuting to work (universe: workers 16 years and over, table X8, 8 fields); E04: Travel time to work (universe: workers 16 years and over who did not work at home, table X8, 14 fields); E05: Number of vehicles available for workers (universe: workers 16 years and over in households, table X8, 8 fields); E06: Median age by means of transportation to work (universe: median age, workers 16 years and over, table X8, 7 fields); E07: Means of transportation to work by race (universe: workers 16 years and over, table X8, 64 fields); E08: Occupation (universe: civilian employed population 16 years and over, table X24, 53 fields); E09: Industry (universe: civilian employed population 16 years and over, table X24, 43 fields); E10: Class of worker (universe: civilian employed population 16 years and over, table X24, 19 fields); E11: Household income and earnings in the past 12 months (universe: total households, table X19, 37 fields); E12: Income and earnings in dollars (universe: inflation-adjusted dollars, tables X19-X20, 31 fields); E13: Family income in dollars (universe: total families, table X19, 17 fields); E14: Health insurance coverage (universe: total families, table X19, 17 fields); E15: Ratio of income to Poverty level (universe: total population for whom Poverty level is determined, table X17, 8 fields); E16: Poverty in population in the past 12 months (universe: total population for whom Poverty level is determined, table X17, 7 fields); E17: Poverty in households in the past 12 months (universe: total households, table X17, 9 fields); E18: Percentage of families and people whose income in the past 12 months is below the poverty level (universe: families, population, table X17, 8 fields), and; X19: Poverty and income deficit (dollars) in the past 12 months for families (universe: families with income below Poverty level in the past 12 months, table X17, 4 fields). The US Census geodemographic data are based on the 2016 TigerLines across multiple geographies. The spatial geographies were merged with ACS data tables. See full documentation at the OCACS project github page (https://github.com/ktalexan/OCACS-Geodemographics).

The module was administered as a post-election interview. The resulting data are provided along with voting, demographic, district and macro variables in a single dataset. CSES Variable Table The list of variables is being provided on the CSES Website to help in understanding what content is available from CSES, and to compare the content available in each module. Themes: MICRO-LEVEL DATA: Identification and study administration variables: weighting factors; election type; date of election 1st and 2nd round; study timing (post-election study, pre-election and post-election study, between rounds of majoritarian election); mode of interview; gender of interviewer; date questionnaire administered; primary electoral district of respondent; number of days the interview was conducted after the election; language of questionnaire. Demography: year and month of birth; gender; education; marital status; union membership; union membership of others in household; business association membership, farmers´ association membership; professional association membership; current employment status; main occupation; socio economic status; employment type - public or private; industrial sector; current employment status, occupation, socio economic status, employment type - public or private, and industrial sector of spouse; household income; number of persons in household; number of children in household under the age of 18; number of children in household under the age of 6; attendance at religious services; religiosity; religious denomination; language usually spoken at home; region of residence; race; ethnicity; rural or urban residence; primary electoral district; country of birth; year arrived in current country. Survey variables: perception of public expenditure on health, education, unemployment benefits, defense, old-age pensions, business and industry, police and law enforcement, welfare benefits; perception of improving individual standard of living, state of economy, government’s action on income inequality; respondent cast a ballot at the current and the previous election; vote choice (presidential, lower house and upper house elections) at the current and the previous election; respondent cast candidate preference vote at the current and the previous election; difference who is in power and who people vote for; sympathy scale for selected parties and political leaders; assessment of parties on the left-right-scale and/or an alternative scale; self-assessment on a left-right-scale and an optional scale; satisfaction with democracy; party identification; intensity of party identification, institutional and personal contact in the electoral campaigning, in person, by mail, phone, text message, email or social networks, institutional contact by whom; political information questions; expected development of household income in the next twelve month; ownership of residence, business or property or farm or livestock, stocks or bonds, savings; likelihood to find another job within the next twelve month; spouse likelihood to find another job within the next twelve month. DISTRICT-LEVEL DATA: number of seats contested in electoral district; number of candidates; number of party lists; percent vote of different parties; official voter turnout in electoral district. MACRO-LEVEL DATA: election outcomes by parties in current (lower house/upper house) legislative election; percent of seats in lower house received by parties in current lower house/upper house election; percent of seats in upper house received by parties in current lower house/upper house election; percent of votes received by presidential candidate of parties in current elections; electoral turnout; party of the president and the prime minister before and after the election; number of portfolios held by each party in cabinet, prior to and after the most recent election; size of the cabinet after the most recent election; number of parties participating in election; ideological families of parties; left-right position of parties assigned by experts and alternative dimensions; most salient factors in the election; fairness of the election; formal complaints against national level results; election irregularities reported; scheduled and held date of election; irregularities of election date; extent of election violence and post-election violence; geographic concentration of violence; post-election protest; electoral alliances permitted during the election campaign; existing electoral alliances; requirements for joint party lists; possibility of apparentement and types of apparentement agreements; multi-party endorsements on ballot; votes cast; voting procedure; voting rounds; party lists close, open, or flexible; transferable votes; cumulated votes if more than one can be cast; compulsory voting; party threshold; unit for the threshold; freedom house rating; democracy-autocracy polity IV rating; age of the current regime; regime: type of executive; number of months since last lower house and last presidential election; electoral formula for presidential elections; electoral formula in all electoral tiers (majoritarian, proportional or mixed); for lower and upper houses was coded: number of electoral segments; linked electoral segments; dependent formulae in mixed systems; subtypes of mixed electoral systems; district magnitude (number of members elected from each district); number of secondary and tertiary electoral districts; fused vote; size of the lower house; GDP growth (annual percent); GDP per capita; inflation, GDP Deflator (annual percent); Human development index; total population; total unemployment; TI corruption perception index; international migrant stock and net migration rate; general government final consumption expenditure; public spending on education; health expenditure; military expenditure; central government debt; Gini index; internet users per 100 inhabitants; mobile phone subscriptions per 100 inhabitants; fixed telephone lines per 100 inhabitants; daily newspapers; constitutional federal structure; number of legislative chambers; electoral results data available; effective number of electoral and parliamentary parties. Individual level: Modes of data collection differ across countries. A standardized questionnaire was administered in face-to-face interviews, telephone interviews or as fixed form self-administered questionnaire. District level: Aggregation of official electoral statistics. Country level: Expert survey using fixed form self-administered questionnaire. The universe differs across countries. In most countries it includes eligible voters or residents aged 18 or older. Sampling Procedure Comment: Sampling procedures differ across countries. In most cases multistage stratified cluster sampling or stratified systematic random sampling was used. Detailed information on sampling for most countries is available in the codebook.

This poll, fielded September 10-14, 2010, is part of a continuing series of monthly surveys that solicit public opinion on the presidency and on a range of other political and social issues. Respondents were asked whether they approved of the way Barack Obama was handling his job as president, the economy, and the situation with Afghanistan. Respondents were also asked what they thought was the most important problem facing the country, whether they thought things in the country were going in the right direction, whether they approved of the way Congress as a whole and individual Democrats and Republicans in Congress were handling their jobs, whether they thought the economy was getting better and their rating of the economy. Opinions were sought on the Republican and Democratic Party, whether the Congressional representative from their district and members of Congress deserved to be re-elected, and whether they thought Republicans in Congress or Barack Obama had a clear plan for solving the nation's problems. Respondents were asked multiple questions about Barack Obama including whether he has made progress in fixing the economy, whether he has expanded the role of government too much in trying to solve the nation's economic problems, whether the Obama Administration had increased taxes for most Americans, and whether respondents thought he had a clear plan for creating jobs. Information was collected on whether respondents thought the country needed a third political party, whether they would rather have a smaller or bigger government, whether the Republicans or the Democrats had better ideas about solving the nation's problems, whether respondents approved of the health care law that was enacted the previous March, whether Congress should repeal this health care law, and who they thought was doing more, Barack Obama or the Republicans in Congress, to improved the economy. Respondents were asked whether they thought Arab Americans, Muslims, and immigrants from the Middle East were being singled out unfairly by people in the United States, whether respondents themselves had negative feelings towards Muslims because of the attack on the World Trade Center, and whether they knew anyone that was Muslim. Additional questions focused on Sarah Palin, the war in Iraq, personal finances, the war in Afghanistan, and the Tea Party movement. Demographic information includes sex, age, race, education level, household income, employment status, military service, religious preference, reported social class, type of residential area (e.g., urban or rural), political party affiliation, political philosophy, voter registration status, and whether respondents thought of themselves as born-again Christians.

This dataset was developed by the Research & Analytics Group at the Atlanta Regional Commission using data from the U.S. Census Bureau across all standard and custom geographies at statewide summary level where applicable.

For a deep dive into the data model including every specific metric, see the ACS 2016-2020 Data Manifest. The manifest details ARC-defined naming conventions, field names/descriptions and topics, summary levels; source tables; notes and so forth for all metrics.

Prefixes:

None

Count

p

Percent

r

Rate

m

Median

a

Mean (average)

t

Aggregate (total)

ch

Change in absolute terms (value in t2 - value in t1)

pch

Percent change ((value in t2 - value in t1) / value in t1)

chp

Change in percent (percent in t2 - percent in t1)

s

Significance flag for change: 1 = statistically significant with a 90% CI, 0 = not statistically significant, blank = cannot be computed

Suffixes:

_e20

Estimate from 2016-20 ACS

_m20

Margin of Error from 2016-20 ACS

_e10

2006-10 ACS, re-estimated to 2020 geography

_m10

Margin of Error from 2006-10 ACS, re-estimated to 2020 geography

_e10_20

Change, 2010-20 (holding constant at 2020 geography)

Geographies

AAA = Area Agency on Aging (12 geographic units formed from counties providing statewide coverage)

ARWDB7 = Atlanta Regional Workforce Development Board (7 counties merged to a single geographic unit)

Census Tracts (statewide)

CFGA23 = Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta (23 counties merged to a single geographic unit)

City (statewide)

City of Atlanta Council Districts (City of Atlanta)

City of Atlanta Neighborhood Planning Unit (City of Atlanta)

City of Atlanta Neighborhood Planning Unit STV (subarea of City of Atlanta)

City of Atlanta Neighborhood Statistical Areas (City of Atlanta)

County (statewide)

Georgia House (statewide)

Georgia Senate (statewide)

MetroWater15 = Atlanta Metropolitan Water District (15 counties merged to a single geographic unit)

Regional Commissions (statewide)

State of Georgia (statewide)

Superdistrict (ARC region)

US Congress (statewide)

UWGA13 = United Way of Greater Atlanta (13 counties merged to a single geographic unit)

WFF = Westside Future Fund (subarea of City of Atlanta)

ZIP Code Tabulation Areas (statewide)

The user should note that American Community Survey data represent estimates derived from a surveyed sample of the population, which creates some level of uncertainty, as opposed to an exact measure of the entire population (the full census count is only conducted once every 10 years and does not cover as many detailed characteristics of the population). Therefore, any measure reported by ACS should not be taken as an exact number – this is why a corresponding margin of error (MOE) is also given for ACS measures. The size of the MOE relative to its corresponding estimate value provides an indication of confidence in the accuracy of each estimate. Each MOE is expressed in the same units as its corresponding measure; for example, if the estimate value is expressed as a number, then its MOE will also be a number; if the estimate value is expressed as a percent, then its MOE will also be a percent.

The user should also note that for relatively small geographic areas, such as census tracts shown here, ACS only releases combined 5-year estimates, meaning these estimates represent rolling averages of survey results that were collected over a 5-year span (in this case 2016-2020). Therefore, these data do not represent any one specific point in time or even one specific year. For geographic areas with larger populations, 3-year and 1-year estimates are also available.

For further explanation of ACS estimates and margin of error, visit Census ACS website.

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Atlanta Regional Commission Date: 2016-2020 Data License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC by 4.0)

Link to the manifest: https://opendata.atlantaregional.com/documents/GARC::acs-2020-data-manifest/about