16 datasets found
  1. Table 3.1a Percentile points from 1 to 99 for total income before and after...

    • gov.uk
    Updated Mar 12, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    HM Revenue & Customs (2025). Table 3.1a Percentile points from 1 to 99 for total income before and after tax [Dataset]. https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/percentile-points-from-1-to-99-for-total-income-before-and-after-tax
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 12, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    GOV.UKhttp://gov.uk/
    Authors
    HM Revenue & Customs
    Description

    The table only covers individuals who have some liability to Income Tax. The percentile points have been independently calculated on total income before tax and total income after tax.

    These statistics are classified as accredited official statistics.

    You can find more information about these statistics and collated tables for the latest and previous tax years on the Statistics about personal incomes page.

    Supporting documentation on the methodology used to produce these statistics is available in the release for each tax year.

    Note: comparisons over time may be affected by changes in methodology. Notably, there was a revision to the grossing factors in the 2018 to 2019 publication, which is discussed in the commentary and supporting documentation for that tax year. Further details, including a summary of significant methodological changes over time, data suitability and coverage, are included in the Background Quality Report.

  2. G

    High income tax filers in Canada

    • open.canada.ca
    • www150.statcan.gc.ca
    • +1more
    csv, html, xml
    Updated Oct 28, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statistics Canada (2024). High income tax filers in Canada [Dataset]. https://open.canada.ca/data/en/dataset/f0548ba7-7dd3-46a9-b8d4-01c3fc59ac0a
    Explore at:
    xml, csv, htmlAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Oct 28, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Statistics Canada
    License

    Open Government Licence - Canada 2.0https://open.canada.ca/en/open-government-licence-canada
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Canada
    Description

    This table presents income shares, thresholds, tax shares, and total counts of individual Canadian tax filers, with a focus on high income individuals (95% income threshold, 99% threshold, etc.). Income thresholds are based on national threshold values, regardless of selected geography; for example, the number of Nova Scotians in the top 1% will be calculated as the number of taxfiling Nova Scotians whose total income exceeded the 99% national income threshold. Different definitions of income are available in the table namely market, total, and after-tax income, both with and without capital gains.

  3. U.S. wealth distribution Q2 2024

    • statista.com
    • ai-chatbox.pro
    Updated Oct 29, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2024). U.S. wealth distribution Q2 2024 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/203961/wealth-distribution-for-the-us/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Oct 29, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    In the first quarter of 2024, almost two-thirds percent of the total wealth in the United States was owned by the top 10 percent of earners. In comparison, the lowest 50 percent of earners only owned 2.5 percent of the total wealth. Income inequality in the U.S. Despite the idea that the United States is a country where hard work and pulling yourself up by your bootstraps will inevitably lead to success, this is often not the case. In 2023, 7.4 percent of U.S. households had an annual income under 15,000 U.S. dollars. With such a small percentage of people in the United States owning such a vast majority of the country’s wealth, the gap between the rich and poor in America remains stark. The top one percent The United States follows closely behind China as the country with the most billionaires in the world. Elon Musk alone held around 219 billion U.S. dollars in 2022. Over the past 50 years, the CEO-to-worker compensation ratio has exploded, causing the gap between rich and poor to grow, with some economists theorizing that this gap is the largest it has been since right before the Great Depression.

  4. F

    Share of Net Worth Held by the Top 1% (99th to 100th Wealth Percentiles)

    • fred.stlouisfed.org
    json
    Updated Jun 20, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2025). Share of Net Worth Held by the Top 1% (99th to 100th Wealth Percentiles) [Dataset]. https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/WFRBST01134
    Explore at:
    jsonAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 20, 2025
    License

    https://fred.stlouisfed.org/legal/#copyright-public-domainhttps://fred.stlouisfed.org/legal/#copyright-public-domain

    Description

    Graph and download economic data for Share of Net Worth Held by the Top 1% (99th to 100th Wealth Percentiles) (WFRBST01134) from Q3 1989 to Q1 2025 about net worth, wealth, percentile, Net, and USA.

  5. w

    Ethiopia - Household Income, Consumption and Expenditure Survey 1999-2000 -...

    • wbwaterdata.org
    Updated Mar 16, 2020
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2020). Ethiopia - Household Income, Consumption and Expenditure Survey 1999-2000 - World Bank SHIP Harmonized Dataset - Dataset - waterdata [Dataset]. https://wbwaterdata.org/dataset/ethiopia-household-income-consumption-and-expenditure-survey-1999-2000-world-bank-ship
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 16, 2020
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Ethiopia
    Description

    Survey based Harmonized Indicators (SHIP) files are harmonized data files from household surveys that are conducted by countries in Africa. To ensure the quality and transparency of the data, it is critical to document the procedures of compiling consumption aggregation and other indicators so that the results can be duplicated with ease. This process enables consistency and continuity that make temporal and cross-country comparisons consistent and more reliable. Four harmonized data files are prepared for each survey to generate a set of harmonized variables that have the same variable names. Invariably, in each survey, questions are asked in a slightly different way, which poses challenges on consistent definition of harmonized variables. The harmonized household survey data present the best available variables with harmonized definitions, but not identical variables. The four harmonized data files are a) Individual level file (Labor force indicators in a separate file): This file has information on basic characteristics of individuals such as age and sex, literacy, education, health, anthropometry and child survival. b) Labor force file: This file has information on labor force including employment/unemployment, earnings, sectors of employment, etc. c) Household level file: This file has information on household expenditure, household head characteristics (age and sex, level of education, employment), housing amenities, assets, and access to infrastructure and services. d) Household Expenditure file: This file has consumption/expenditure aggregates by consumption groups according to Purpose (COICOP) of Household Consumption of the UN.

  6. Average monthly pay of employees in the UK in 2025, by percentile

    • statista.com
    Updated May 14, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2025). Average monthly pay of employees in the UK in 2025, by percentile [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1224844/monthly-pay-of-employees-uk/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    May 14, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    Mar 2025
    Area covered
    United Kingdom
    Description

    In March 2025, the top one percent of earners in the United Kingdom received an average pay of over 16,000 British pounds per month, compared with the bottom ten percent of earners who earned around 800 pounds a month.

  7. Monetary Policy and the Redistribution Channel, Italy and U.S., 1999-2013,...

    • icpsr.umich.edu
    Updated Aug 26, 2021
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Auclert, Adrien (2021). Monetary Policy and the Redistribution Channel, Italy and U.S., 1999-2013, 2001-2002, 2010 [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR38144.v1
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Aug 26, 2021
    Dataset provided by
    Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Researchhttps://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/pages/
    Authors
    Auclert, Adrien
    License

    https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/studies/38144/termshttps://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/studies/38144/terms

    Area covered
    Italy, United States
    Description

    This study contains the top-level Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID) Stata dataset used for the analysis in "Monetary Policy in the Redistribution Channel", published by Adrien Auclert in the June 2019 issue of the American Economic Review. That article's abstract reads: "This paper evaluates the role of redistribution in the transmission mechanism of monetary policy to consumption. Three channels affect aggregate spending when winners and losers have different marginal propensities to consume: an earnings heterogeneity channel from unequal income gains, a Fisher channel from unexpected inflation, and an interest rate exposure channel from real interest rate changes. Sufficient statistics from Italian and US data suggest that all three channels are likely to amplify the effects of monetary policy."

  8. N

    Orchid, FL annual median income by work experience and sex dataset: Aged...

    • neilsberg.com
    csv, json
    Updated Feb 27, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Neilsberg Research (2025). Orchid, FL annual median income by work experience and sex dataset: Aged 15+, 2010-2023 (in 2023 inflation-adjusted dollars) // 2025 Edition [Dataset]. https://www.neilsberg.com/insights/orchid-fl-income-by-gender/
    Explore at:
    csv, jsonAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Feb 27, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Neilsberg Research
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Florida, Orchid
    Variables measured
    Income for Male Population, Income for Female Population, Income for Male Population working full time, Income for Male Population working part time, Income for Female Population working full time, Income for Female Population working part time
    Measurement technique
    The data presented in this dataset is derived from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 5-Year Estimates. The dataset covers the years 2010 to 2023, representing 14 years of data. To analyze income differences between genders (male and female), we conducted an initial data analysis and categorization. Subsequently, we adjusted these figures for inflation using the Consumer Price Index retroactive series (R-CPI-U-RS) based on current methodologies. For additional information about these estimations, please contact us via email at research@neilsberg.com
    Dataset funded by
    Neilsberg Research
    Description
    About this dataset

    Context

    The dataset presents median income data over a decade or more for males and females categorized by Total, Full-Time Year-Round (FT), and Part-Time (PT) employment in Orchid. It showcases annual income, providing insights into gender-specific income distributions and the disparities between full-time and part-time work. The dataset can be utilized to gain insights into gender-based pay disparity trends and explore the variations in income for male and female individuals.

    Key observations: Insights from 2023

    Based on our analysis ACS 2019-2023 5-Year Estimates, we present the following observations: - All workers, aged 15 years and older: In Orchid, the median income for all workers aged 15 years and older, regardless of work hours, was $87,190 for males and $23,750 for females.

    These income figures highlight a substantial gender-based income gap in Orchid. Women, regardless of work hours, earn 27 cents for each dollar earned by men. This significant gender pay gap, approximately 73%, underscores concerning gender-based income inequality in the town of Orchid.

    - Full-time workers, aged 15 years and older: In Orchid, among full-time, year-round workers aged 15 years and older, males earned a median income of $194,583, while females earned $2,499, leading to a 99% gender pay gap among full-time workers. This illustrates that women earn 01 cents for each dollar earned by men in full-time roles. This level of income gap emphasizes the urgency to address and rectify this ongoing disparity, where women, despite working full-time, face a more significant wage discrepancy compared to men in the same employment roles.

    Remarkably, across all roles, including non-full-time employment, women displayed a similar gender pay gap percentage. This indicates a consistent gender pay gap scenario across various employment types in Orchid, showcasing a consistent income pattern irrespective of employment status.

    Content

    When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2019-2023 5-Year Estimates. All incomes have been adjusting for inflation and are presented in 2023-inflation-adjusted dollars.

    Gender classifications include:

    • Male
    • Female

    Employment type classifications include:

    • Full-time, year-round: A full-time, year-round worker is a person who worked full time (35 or more hours per week) and 50 or more weeks during the previous calendar year.
    • Part-time: A part-time worker is a person who worked less than 35 hours per week during the previous calendar year.

    Variables / Data Columns

    • Year: This column presents the data year. Expected values are 2010 to 2023
    • Male Total Income: Annual median income, for males regardless of work hours
    • Male FT Income: Annual median income, for males working full time, year-round
    • Male PT Income: Annual median income, for males working part time
    • Female Total Income: Annual median income, for females regardless of work hours
    • Female FT Income: Annual median income, for females working full time, year-round
    • Female PT Income: Annual median income, for females working part time

    Good to know

    Margin of Error

    Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.

    Custom data

    If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.

    Inspiration

    Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.

    Recommended for further research

    This dataset is a part of the main dataset for Orchid median household income by race. You can refer the same here

  9. T

    Thailand Average Monthly Wages

    • tradingeconomics.com
    • de.tradingeconomics.com
    • +13more
    csv, excel, json, xml
    Updated Mar 15, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    TRADING ECONOMICS (2025). Thailand Average Monthly Wages [Dataset]. https://tradingeconomics.com/thailand/wages
    Explore at:
    xml, excel, csv, jsonAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Mar 15, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    TRADING ECONOMICS
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Time period covered
    Mar 31, 1999 - Dec 31, 2024
    Area covered
    Thailand
    Description

    Wages in Thailand increased to 15737.61 THB/Month in the fourth quarter of 2024 from 15715.16 THB/Month in the third quarter of 2024. This dataset provides - Thailand Average Monthly Wages - actual values, historical data, forecast, chart, statistics, economic calendar and news.

  10. Average annual earnings for full-time employees in the UK 1999-2024

    • statista.com
    • ai-chatbox.pro
    Updated May 13, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2025). Average annual earnings for full-time employees in the UK 1999-2024 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1002964/average-full-time-annual-earnings-in-the-uk/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    May 13, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    1999 - 2024
    Area covered
    United Kingdom
    Description

    The median annual earnings for full-time employees in the United Kingdom was approximately 37,430 British pounds in 2024, compared with 34,963 pounds in the previous year. At the start of the provided time period, in 1999, the average full-time salary in the UK was 17,803 pounds per year, with median earnings exceeding 20,000 pounds per year in 2002, and 30,000 by 2019. Wages continue to grow faster than inflation in 2025 Between November 2021 and July 2023 inflation was higher than wage growth in the UK, with wages still outpacing inflation as of March 2025. At the peak of the recent wave of high inflation in October 2022, the CPI inflation rate reached a 41-year-high of 11.1 percent, wages were growing much slower at 6.1 percent. Since that peak, inflation remained persistently high for several months, only dropping below double figures in April 2023, when inflation was 8.7 percent, down from 10.1 percent in the previous month. For 2023 as a whole, the average annual rate of inflation was 7.3 percent but fell to 2.5 percent in 2024, but is forecast to increase to 3.2 percent in 2025. Highest and lowest-paid occupations As of 2023, the highest-paid occupation in the UK was that of Chief Executives and Senior Officials, who had an average weekly pay of approximately, 1,576 pounds. By contrast, the lowest-paid occupation that year was that of retail cashiers, and check-out operators, who earned approximately 383 pounds a week. For industry sectors as a whole, people who worked full-time in the electricity, gas, steam and air conditioning supply sector had the highest average earnings, at 955 pounds a week, compared with 505 pounds a week in the accommodation and food services sector, the lowest average earnings in 2023.

  11. E

    Defra Farm Business Survey (1999-2015)

    • catalogue.ceh.ac.uk
    Updated Mar 1, 2016
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    NERC EDS Environmental Information Data Centre (2016). Defra Farm Business Survey (1999-2015) [Dataset]. https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/0e1bb9f5-6154-4f26-91df-7bca7e3ce38d
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 1, 2016
    Dataset provided by
    NERC EDS Environmental Information Data Centre
    Area covered
    Description

    The Farm Business Survey (FBS) provides information on the financial, physical and environmental performance of farm businesses in England to inform and evaluate policy decisions. The FBS is intended to serve the needs of farmers, farming and land management interest groups, government, government partners and researchers. Survey results typically give comparisons between groups of businesses, e.g between regions or between farm types. The results attracting most attention are on farm incomes and productivity. Some of the results are produced and published by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra), whilst others are produced and published by the Rural Business Research (RBR) team. The farm business survey produces a number of reports, the most influential of which are. Farm Accounts (1999-2015) in England is the primary publication from the Farm Business Survey. It provides information on farm incomes, outputs and costs for the various farm types, farm sizes, regions and economic performance. This report can also include information on weather, diversification and succession . Farm Business Income (2011-15) - Annual statistics on farm business income in England. Farm Household Income and Household Composition (2005-2015) - Data on farm household income, which comprises Farm Business Income (including that from diversified enterprises), the off-farm income of the principal farmer and their spouse/common law partner and income from other household members. Information also on household composition and farm net worth and assets. Farm Rents (1968-2015) - Annual statistics about average farm rents in England. Farmer’s intentions (2010-11, 2013-14) - Farmers’ aspirations and plans for the whole business and for individual enterprises. Water usage on farms (2009-10, 2013-15) - Estimates of water use on farms in England. Other analysis from the farm business survey include - Animal health and welfare (2005-6, 2011-12) - Extensive information on cattle, sheep, pigs and poultry. Balance sheet analysis and farm performance (2010-11, 2012-13) - This release presents the main results from an analysis of the profitability and resilience of farms in England. Countryside maintenance and management (2005-11) - Number of farms participating in countryside management and maintenance activity (CMMA) and costs involved. Participation in different types of CMMA also documented (e.g Soil and water protection) Farm business management practices (2010-11) - Information on farmers qualifications and relevant skills across farm types. Computer usage information also there. Farm diversification (1998-2010) - Number of holdings participating in some form of diversification, by type of diversification, farm size and farm type. Later reports include the contribution of diversification to farm income. This is now included under farm accounts. Farm energy use ( 2007-2008, 2011-2012) - Fuel use, fertiliser use, minimum tillage information, dairy feed intake, straw baling, contractor use Farm Succession (2013-14) - Data about the presence and nature of farm business succession arrangements. Fertiliser usage on farms (2012-15) - Data (by region) on the quantities of nutrients from manufactured fertilisers that were applied from a subset of farms within the main survey. The use of precision farming techniques, soil nutrient software, clover and legumes in grass swards, green manures and areas subject to fertiliser restrictions. Milk selling arrangements (2010) - Data on the milk selling arrangements of Dairy Farmers.

  12. c

    Family Expenditure Survey, 1999-2000

    • datacatalogue.cessda.eu
    Updated Nov 28, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Office for National Statistics (2024). Family Expenditure Survey, 1999-2000 [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-4315-1
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 28, 2024
    Authors
    Office for National Statistics
    Time period covered
    Apr 1, 1999 - Mar 1, 2000
    Area covered
    United Kingdom
    Variables measured
    National, Consumers, Households, Families/households
    Measurement technique
    Face-to-face interview, Diaries
    Description

    Abstract copyright UK Data Service and data collection copyright owner.

    The Family Expenditure Survey (FES), which closed in 2001, was a continuous survey with an annual sample of around 10,000 households. They provided information on household and personal incomes, certain payments that recurred regularly (e.g. rent, gas and electricity bills, telephone accounts, insurances, season tickets and hire purchase payments), and maintained a detailed expenditure record for 14 consecutive days.

    The original purpose of the FES was to provide information on spending patterns for the United Kingdom Retail Price Index (RPI). The survey was a cost-efficient way of collecting a variety of related data that the government departments required to correlate with income and expenditure at the household, tax unit and person levels. The annual FES began in 1957 (with an earlier large scale survey conducted in 1953/54) and was one of the first Department of Employment (DE) systems to be computerised in the early 1960s. The UKDA holds FES data from 1961-2001. The Northern Ireland Family Expenditure Survey (NIFES), which ran from 1967-1998, was identical to the UK FES and therefore used the same questionnaires and documentation. However, starting in 1988, a voluntary question on religious denomination was asked of those aged 16 and over in Northern Ireland. The UKDA holds NIFES data from 1968-1998, under GN 33240.

    Significant FES developments over time include:
    • 1968: the survey was extended to include a sample drawn from the Northern Ireland FES and a new computer system was introduced which was used until 1985
    • 1986: DE and the Office of Population Censuses and Surveys (OPCS) converted the FES into a new database system using the SIR package
    • 1989: the Central Statistical Office (CSO) took over responsibility for the survey
    • 1994: in April, computerised personal interviewing was introduced using lap-top computers, the database system changed to INGRES and the survey changed from a calendar year to financial year basis
    • 1996: in April, OPCS and CSO were amalgamated into the Office for National Statistics (ONS), who assumed responsibility for the FES
    • 1998: from April onwards information from expenditure diaries kept by children aged 7 to 15 was included in data, and grossing factors were made available on the database
    From 2001, the both the FES and the National Food Survey (NFS) (held at the UKDA under GN 33071) were completely replaced by a new survey, the Expenditure and Food Survey (EFS). Prior to the advent of the EFS, there had previously been considerable overlap between the FES and NFS, with both surveys asking respondents to keep a diary of expenditure. Thus, the 2000-2001 FES was the final one in the series. The design of the new EFS was based on the previous FES; further background to its development may be found in the 1999-2000 and 2000-2001 Family Spending reports. From 2008, the EFS became the Living Costs and Food Survey (LCF) (see under GN 33334).


    Main Topics:
    Household Schedule:
    This schedule was taken at the main interview. Information for most of the questions was obtained from the head of household or housewife, but certain questions of a more individual character were put to every spender aged 15 or over (or 16 or over from 1973 onwards). Until the introduction of the community charge, information on rateable value and rate poundage was obtained from the appropriate local authority, as was information on whether the address was within a smokeless zone. Information was collected about the household, the sex and age of each member, and also details about the type and size of the household accommodation. The main part of the questionnaire related to expenditure both of a household and individual nature, but the questions were mainly confined to expenses of a recurring nature, e.g.:
    • Household: housing costs, payment to Gas and Electricity Boards or companies, telephone charges, licences and television rental
    • Individual: motor vehicles, season tickets for transport, life and accident insurances, payments through a bank, instalments, refund of expenses by employer, expenditure claimed by self-employed persons as business expenses for tax purposes, welfare foods, education grants and fees
    Income Schedule:
    Data were collected for each household spender. The schedule was concerned with income, national insurance contributions and income tax. Income of a child not classed as a spender was obtained from one or other of his parents and entered on the parent's questionnaire. Information collected included: employment status and recent absences from work, earnings of an employee, self-employed earnings, National Insurance contributions, pensions and other regular allowances, occasional benefits - social security benefits and other...

  13. T

    Hong Kong Average Monthly Salaries

    • tradingeconomics.com
    • pl.tradingeconomics.com
    • +13more
    csv, excel, json, xml
    Updated Jan 1, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    TRADING ECONOMICS, Hong Kong Average Monthly Salaries [Dataset]. https://tradingeconomics.com/hong-kong/wages
    Explore at:
    json, xml, excel, csvAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jan 1, 2023
    Dataset authored and provided by
    TRADING ECONOMICS
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Time period covered
    Mar 31, 1999 - Mar 31, 2025
    Area covered
    Hong Kong
    Description

    Wages in Hong Kong increased to 19115 HKD/Month in the first quarter of 2025 from 19101 HKD/Month in the fourth quarter of 2024. This dataset provides - Hong Kong Wage Index - actual values, historical data, forecast, chart, statistics, economic calendar and news.

  14. International Social Survey Programme: Social Inequality I-IV - ISSP...

    • datacatalogue.cessda.eu
    • pollux-fid.de
    • +1more
    Updated May 26, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Evans, Ann; Evans, Mariah; Zagórski, Krzysztof; Bean, Clive; Kelley, Jonathan; Höllinger, Franz; Hadler, Markus; Haller, Max; Dimova, Lilia; Kaloyanov, Todor; Stoyanov, Alexander; Frizell, Alan; Segovia, Carolina; Lehmann, Carla; Papageorgiou, Bambos; Matějů, Petr; Simonová, Natalie; Rehakova, Blanka; Forsé, Michel; Lemel, Yannick; Wolf, Christof; Mohler, Peter Ph.; Harkness, Janet; Zentralarchiv für Empirische Sozialforschung; Braun, Michael; Park, Alison; Jowell, Roger; Brook, Lindsay; Witherspoon, Sharon; Stratford, Nina; Bromley, Catherine; Jarvis, Lindsey; Thomson, Katarina; Róbert, Péter; Szanto, Janos; Kolosi, Tamás; Lewin-Epstein, Noah; Yuchtmann-Yaar, Eppie; Meraviglia, Cinzia; Calvi, Gabriele; Anselmi, Paolo; Cito Filomarino, Beatrice; Nishi, Kumiko; Hara, Miwako; Aramaki, Hiroshi; Onodera, Noriko; Tabuns, Aivars; Koroleva, Ilze; Gendall, Philip; Skjåk, Knut K.; Kolsrud, Kirstine; Mortensen, Anne K.; Halvorsen, Knut; Leiulfsrud, Håkon; Cichomski, Bogdan; Mach, Bogdan W.; Social Weather Stations, Quezon City; Vala, Jorge; Villaverde Cabral, Manuel; Ramos, Alice; Khakhulina, Ludmilla; Institute for Sociology of Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava; Hafner-Fink, Mitja; Toš, Niko; Malnar, Brina; Stebe, Janez; Diez-Nicholas, Juan; Edlund, Jonas; Svallfors, Stefan; Joye, Dominique; Soziologisches Institut; Smith, Tom W.; Marsden, Peter V.; Hout, Michael; Davis, James A. (2023). International Social Survey Programme: Social Inequality I-IV - ISSP 1987-1992-1999-2009 [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.4232/1.11911
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    May 26, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Levada Centerhttp://www.levada.ru/
    TARKI Social Research Institute
    University of Lausanne, Switzerland
    National Opinion Research Center (NORC), Chicago, USA
    Research School of Social Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra
    National Centre for Social Research (NatCen), London, Great Britain
    ZUMA, Mannheim, Germany
    Institute of Sociology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Research Team on Social Stratification, Prague, Czech Republic
    The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
    Norwegian Social Science Data Services, Bergen, Norway
    Agency for Social Analyses (ASA), Bulgaria
    Instituto de Ciências Sociais da Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal
    Israel
    Centro de Estudios Públicos (CEP), Santiago, Chile
    Eurisko, Milan, Italy
    Institute of Sociology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic
    Oslo University College, Norway
    National Opinion Research Center (NORC), USA
    Institut für Soziologie, Universität Graz, Austria
    Public Opinion and Mass Communication Research Centre (CJMMK), University of Ljubljana, Slovenia
    Universität zu Köln
    B.I. and Lucille Cohen, Institute for public opinion research, Tel Aviv, Israel
    Institute of Philosophy and Sociology, University of Latvia, Latvia
    Japan
    Social and Community Planning Research, London
    Melbourne Institute for Applied Economic and Social Research University of Melbourne, Australia
    Department of Sociology, Umea University, Umea, Sweden
    Institute for Social Studies, Warsaw University (ISS UW), Warsaw, Poland
    Department of Sociology and Political Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim
    Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada
    NHK Broadcasting Culture Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan
    Center of Applied Research, Cyprus College, Nicosia, Cyprus
    Slovakian Republic
    ASEP, Madrid, Spain
    Philippines
    GESIS Leibniz Institut für Sozialwissenschaften, Mannheim, Germany
    Institute of Social Research, University of Eastern Piedmont, Italy
    FRANCE-ISSP (Centre de Recherche en Economie et Statistique, Laboratoire de Sociologie Quantitative), Malakoff, France
    Center for the Study of Democracy, Sofia, Bulgaria
    National Centre for Social Research, London, Great Britain
    Universität Zürich
    Public Opinion and Mass Communication Research Centre, University of Ljubljana
    Institut für Soziologie, Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz, Austria
    Department of Communication, Journalism and Marketing, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand
    Institute for Public Opinion Research at the Statistical Office of Slovak Republic
    Institute of Political Study, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw
    Authors
    Evans, Ann; Evans, Mariah; Zagórski, Krzysztof; Bean, Clive; Kelley, Jonathan; Höllinger, Franz; Hadler, Markus; Haller, Max; Dimova, Lilia; Kaloyanov, Todor; Stoyanov, Alexander; Frizell, Alan; Segovia, Carolina; Lehmann, Carla; Papageorgiou, Bambos; Matějů, Petr; Simonová, Natalie; Rehakova, Blanka; Forsé, Michel; Lemel, Yannick; Wolf, Christof; Mohler, Peter Ph.; Harkness, Janet; Zentralarchiv für Empirische Sozialforschung; Braun, Michael; Park, Alison; Jowell, Roger; Brook, Lindsay; Witherspoon, Sharon; Stratford, Nina; Bromley, Catherine; Jarvis, Lindsey; Thomson, Katarina; Róbert, Péter; Szanto, Janos; Kolosi, Tamás; Lewin-Epstein, Noah; Yuchtmann-Yaar, Eppie; Meraviglia, Cinzia; Calvi, Gabriele; Anselmi, Paolo; Cito Filomarino, Beatrice; Nishi, Kumiko; Hara, Miwako; Aramaki, Hiroshi; Onodera, Noriko; Tabuns, Aivars; Koroleva, Ilze; Gendall, Philip; Skjåk, Knut K.; Kolsrud, Kirstine; Mortensen, Anne K.; Halvorsen, Knut; Leiulfsrud, Håkon; Cichomski, Bogdan; Mach, Bogdan W.; Social Weather Stations, Quezon City; Vala, Jorge; Villaverde Cabral, Manuel; Ramos, Alice; Khakhulina, Ludmilla; Institute for Sociology of Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava; Hafner-Fink, Mitja; Toš, Niko; Malnar, Brina; Stebe, Janez; Diez-Nicholas, Juan; Edlund, Jonas; Svallfors, Stefan; Joye, Dominique; Soziologisches Institut; Smith, Tom W.; Marsden, Peter V.; Hout, Michael; Davis, James A.
    Time period covered
    Feb 1987 - Jan 16, 2012
    Area covered
    New Zealand, Italy, Norway, Philippines, Japan, Chile, Canada, Switzerland, Austria, Portugal
    Measurement technique
    Self-administered questionnaire, Mode of interview differs for the individual countries: partly face-to-face interviews (partly CAPI) with standardized questionnaire, partly paper and pencil and postal survey, exceptionally computer assisted web interview (CAWI)
    Description

    The International Social Survey Programme (ISSP) is a continuous programme of cross-national collaboration running annual surveys on topics important for the social sciences. The programme started in 1984 with four founding members - Australia, Germany, Great Britain, and the United States – and has now grown to almost 50 member countries from all over the world. As the surveys are designed for replication, they can be used for both, cross-national and cross-time comparisons. Each ISSP module focuses on a specific topic, which is repeated in regular time intervals. Please, consult the documentation for details on how the national ISSP surveys are fielded. The present study focuses on questions about social inequality.
    The release of the cumulated ISSP ´Social Inequality´ modules for the years 1987, 1992, 1999 and 2009 consists of two separate datasets: ZA5890 and ZA5891. This documentation deals with the main dataset ZA5890. It contains all the cumulated variables, while the supplementary data file ZA5961 contains those variables that could not be cumulated for various reasons. However, they can be matched easily to the cumulated file if necessary. A comprehensive overview on the contents, the structure and basic coding rules of both data files can be found in the following guide:

    Guide for the ISSP ´Social Inequality´ cumulation of the years 1987,1992, 1999 and 2009

    Social Inequality I-IV:

    Importance of social background and other factors as prerequisites for personal success in society (wealthy family, well-educated parents, good education, ambitions, natural ability, hard work, knowing the right people, political connections, person´s race and religion, the part of a country a person comes from, gender and political beliefs); chances to increase personal standard of living (social mobility); corruption as criteria for social mobility; importance of differentiated payment; higher payment with acceptance of increased responsibility; higher payment as incentive for additional qualification of workers; avoidability of inequality of society; increased income expectation as motivation for taking up studies; good profits for entrepreneurs as best prerequisite for increase in general standard of living; insufficient solidarity of the average population as reason for the persistence of social inequalities; opinion about own salary: actual occupational earning is adequate; income differences are too large in the respondent´s country; responsibility of government to reduce income differences; government should provide chances for poor children to go to university; jobs for everyone who wants one; government should provide a decent living standard for the unemployed and spend less on benefits for poor people; demand for basic income for all; opinion on taxes for people with high incomes; judgement on total taxation for recipients of high, middle and low incomes; justification of better medical supply and better education for richer people; perception of class conflicts between social groups in the country (poor and rich people, working class and middle class, unemployed and employed people, management and workers, farmers and city people, people at the top of society and people at the bottom, young people and older people); salary criteria (scale: job responsibility, years of education and training, supervising others, needed support for familiy and children, quality of job performance or hard work at the job); feeling of a just payment; perceived and desired social structure of country; self-placement within social structure of society; number of books in the parental home in the respondent´s youth (cultural resources); self-assessment of social class; level of status of respondent´s job compared to father (social mobility); self-employment, employee of a private company or business or government, occupation (ILO, ISCO 1988), type of job of respondent´s father in the respondent´s youth; mother´s occupation (ILO, ISCO 1988) in the respondent´s youth; respondent´s type of job in first and current (last) job; self-employment of respondent´ first job or worked for someone else.

    Demograpy: sex; age; marital status; steady life partner; education of respondent: years of schooling and highest education level; current employment status; hours worked weekly; occupation (ILO, ISCO 1988); self-employment; supervising function at work; working-type: working for private or public sector or self-employed; if self-employed: number of employees; trade union membership; highest education level of father and mother; education of spouse or partner: years of schooling and highest education level; current employment status of spouse or partner; occupation of spouse or partner (ILO, ISCO 1988); self-employment of spouse or partner; size of household; household composition (children and adults); type of housing; party affiliation (left-right (derived from affiliation to a certain party); party affiliation (derived from...

  15. Living Standards Survey 1998-1999 - Ghana

    • webapps.ilo.org
    Updated Jun 16, 2017
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Ghana Statistical Service (GSS) (2017). Living Standards Survey 1998-1999 - Ghana [Dataset]. https://webapps.ilo.org/surveyLib/index.php/catalog/391
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 16, 2017
    Dataset provided by
    Ghana Statistical Services
    Authors
    Ghana Statistical Service (GSS)
    Time period covered
    1998 - 1999
    Area covered
    Ghana
    Description

    Abstract

    The Ghana Living Standards Survey (GLSS), with its focus on the household as a key social and economic unit, provides valuable insights into living conditions in Ghana. This present report gives a summary of the main findings of the fourth round survey, which was carried out by the Ghana Statistical Service (GSS) over a 12-month period (April 1998 to March 1999).

    A representative nationwide sample of more than 5,998 households, containing over 25,000 persons, was covered in GLSS 4. Detailed information was collected on all aspects of living conditions, including health, education, employment, housing, agricultural activities, the operation of non-farm establishments, remittances, savings, and credit and assets. The special focus of GLSS 4 was on collecting detailed labour force, income and expenditure data in respect of all household members.

    The key findings of the survey are as follows:

    Education

    Information are given on levels of educational attainment of the adult population, current school enrolment, educational expenditure by households, adult literacy rates, and apprenticeship training. About 32 percent of all adults (representing nearly three and a half million people) have never been to school, a quarter went to school but did not obtain any qualifications; about 33 percent have the MSLC/JSS certificate as their highest qualification, while the remaining 10 percent (a million adults) have secondary or higher-level qualifications (Section 2.1).

    About 8 in every ten children aged 6-15, and about half of those aged 16-18, are currently attending school or college. Attendance rates for females are lower than those for males, especially in the northern half of the country (Section 2.2). The average annual cost to a household of maintaining a person at school or college was ¢163,500 per year in March 1999 cedis (Section 2.3). The survey results indicate that 50 percent of adults in Ghana are literate in English or a local language. There are substantial differences between the sexes, and between localities, with regard to literacy. A little over 6 out of every 10 men, but fewer than 4 out of every 10 women, are literate. More than two-thirds (66%) of adults in urban areas are literate, but in rural areas only 41 percent are literate (Section 2.4).

    Health

    The survey collected data on each person's health condition over the previous two weeks; on the fertility, pre-natal care and contraceptive use of women aged 15-49; on the post-natal care of children aged 5 years and under; and on the preventive health care and vaccination of children aged 7 years and under. About 26 percent of the sample reported having suffered from an illness or injury in the previous two weeks, 61 percent of whom had to stop their usual activities due to the indisposition (Section 3.2).

    The survey found that 7.0 percent of women were currently pregnant, and a further 13.2 percent had been pregnant in the last 12 months. Only about 15 percent of all women aged 15-49 or their partners reported using contraceptives; about 11 percent use modern methods, and 4 percent use traditional methods, to prevent or delay pregnancy (Section 3.3). The level of breastfeeding in Ghana is very high; about 98 percent of all children under 5 have been breastfed at one time or another. About 7 percent of children below the age of 8 have never been vaccinated against any of the childhood killer diseases.

    Employment

    As a major focus of the survey, a wide range of estimates of economic activity, employment, unemployment, underemployment and working conditions are given in the report. The survey also has detailed information about time spent on housekeeping activities. About 77 percent of the adult population (aged 15+) is currently economically active. The activity rates for males and females differ, with the rate for women in the age group (15-64) lower than those for men, but in the younger age group (7-14) and the older age group (65+) the rates for females exceed those for males. For each age group the activity rates for males and females are higher in rural areas (apart from rural savannah) than in urban areas (Section 4.2).

    The majority of the working population is employed in agricultural activities (55.0%), followed by trading (18.3%) and then manufacturing (11.7%). Whereas 27.4 percent of working females are engaged in trading, only 7.4 percent of males are traders. The highest hourly wage rates are obtained in mining and quarrying, followed by financial services and then trading. For all areas of employment, females earn lower wages than males (Section 4.3). About 8 percent of the currently active population can be classified as unemployed, but there is also a high degree of underemployment, with some people having a job but wanting to do more work (Section 4.4).

    In many households, particularly in rural areas, family members (especially women) spend a great deal of their time fetching water and firewood, in addition to the time spent on other household activities such as cooking and cleaning (Section 4.5).

    Migration

    The report provides data on migration to create some awareness that would generate further discussions and research into the complex field of population relocation. Some 52 percent of all Ghanaians are migrants, having previously lived in a locality different from where they are living at present; a further 16 percent have moved away from their birthplace, but subsequently returned (Section 5.1).

    Housing

    Detailed information is presented on a variety of housing characteristics: the occupancy status of the household; household size and room density; access to drinking water, toilet facilities, source of lighting and fuel, rubbish disposal, and materials used in house construction. A little over 40 percent (24 percent in urban areas and 60 percent in rural areas) of the households own the houses they live in. About 80 percent of the households in urban areas have access to pipe-borne water, compared with only 19 percent in rural areas. More than three-quarters of urban households have electricity for lighting, compared with only 17 percent of rural households. Most urban households use charcoal for cooking, whereas most households in rural areas use firewood. Only 14 percent of urban households, and 2 percent of rural households, have access to a flush toilet (Section 6.3).

    Household agriculture

    About 2.7 million households in Ghana own or operate a farm or keep livestock (Section 7.1). More than half of households, which cultivate crops hire labour for their operations. The major crops, in terms of sales, are cocoa, maize, groundnuts/peanuts, and rice (Section 7.2). About 2 and a half million households process crops or fish for sale, with the major responsibility for this activity falling on women.

    Non-farm enterprises

    Approximately 1.9 million households or 49 percent of all households in Ghana operate a non-farm business with women operating two-thirds of these businesses. About 56 percent of all businesses involve retail trade, and most of the rest cover some kind of manufacturing (for instance food, beverages, textiles or clothing) (Section 8.1).

    Total expenditure

    Average annual household expenditure (both cash and imputed) relative to March 1999 prices was about ¢4,244,000. Given an average household size of 4.3, this implies annual per capita expenditure of about ¢987,000 (Section 9.1). With an exchange rate of ¢2,394 to the US dollar prevailing at March 1999, the average annual household expenditure is US$1,773 and the pre-capita expenditure is US$412. Overall, cash expenditure on food represents 45.4 percent of total household expenditure, while the imputed value of own-produced food consumed by households represents a further 10.3 percent (Section 9.2).

    Cash expenditure

    Relative to March 1999 prices, Ghanaian households spend on average almost ¢3,500,000 a year (at March 1999 prices), or ¢804,000 on per capita basis (Section 9.3). On national terms, just below half of total cash expenditure (46%) went to food and beverages; and alcohol and tobacco, and clothing and footwear, each accounted for about 10 percent of it. The next most important expenditure groups, in terms of amount spent, are recreation and education (7.5%), transport and communications (5.6%), housing and utility (6.4%) and household goods, operations and services (6.0%).

    Food consumption

    At the time of the survey Ghanaian households (which number about 4.2 million) were spending on average an amount of almost ¢2.4 billion (at March 1999 prices) on food (Section 9.5), with own-grown food consumed amounting to the value of almost ¢435,000 (Section 8.7). The most important food consumption subgroups, in terms of cash expenditure are roots and tubers (22%), fish (16%), cereals and cereal products (15%), vegetables (9%), and meat (5%). Prepared meals account for 11 percent by value of total food consumption.

    While the pattern of consumption, in terms of food subgroups, is broadly similar in urban and rural areas, residents in rural areas consume more roots and tubers, and pulses and nuts than their counterparts in urban areas. Expenditure on alcohol and tobacco is also higher in rural areas. In contrast, the consumption of meat and prepared meal are much higher in urban areas than in rural areas, and urban residents spend much more on cereals and cereal products and poultry and poultry products than their rural counterparts (Section 9.5).

    Remittances

    About 76 percent of all households reported having remitted money or goods in the previous 12 months to persons who were not their household members. The bulk of these remittances to non-household members went to relatives (93%), and in particular to parents or children (50%), brothers or sisters (18%), and other relatives (23%). Such income flows from the household benefited females (64%) more than their male counterparts (36%).

    Whilst

  16. Minimum wage in the UK 1999-2025, by wage category

    • statista.com
    • ai-chatbox.pro
    Updated Jan 31, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2025). Minimum wage in the UK 1999-2025, by wage category [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/280483/national-minimum-wage-in-the-uk/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jan 31, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    1999 - 2025
    Area covered
    United Kingdom
    Description

    In April 2025, the UK minimum wage for adults over the age of 21 in will be 12.21 pounds per hour. For the 2025/26 financial year, there will be four minimum wage categories, three of which are based on age and one for apprentice workers. Apprentices, and workers under the age of 18 will have a minimum wage of 7.55 pounds an hour, increasing to ten pounds for those aged 18 to 20. When the minimum wage was first introduced in 1999, there were just two age categories; 18 to 21, and 22 and over. This increased to three categories in 2004, four in 2010, and five between 2016 and 2023, before being reduced down to four in the most recent year. The living wage The living wage is an alternative minimum wage amount that employers in the UK can voluntarily pay their employees. It is calculated independently of the legal minimum wage and results in a higher value figure. In 2023/24, for example, the living wage was twelve pounds an hour for the UK as a whole and 13.15 for workers in London, where the cost of living is typically higher. This living wage is different from what the UK government has named the national living wage, which was 10.42 in the same financial year. Between 2011/12 and 2023/24, the living wage has increased by 4.80 pounds, while the London living wage has grown by 4.85 pounds. Wage growth cancelled-out by high inflation 2021-2023 For a long period between the middle of 2021 and late 2023, average wage growth in the UK was unable to keep up with record inflation levels, resulting in the biggest fall in disposable income since 1956. Although the UK government attempted to mitigate the impact of falling living standards through a series of cost of living payments, the situation has still been very difficult for households. After peaking at 11.1 percent in October 2022, the UK's inflation rate remained in double figures until March 2023, and did not fall to the preferred rate of two percent until May 2024. As of November 2024, regular weekly pay in the UK was growing by 5.6 percent in nominal terms, and 2.5 percent when adjusted for inflation.

  17. Not seeing a result you expected?
    Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
HM Revenue & Customs (2025). Table 3.1a Percentile points from 1 to 99 for total income before and after tax [Dataset]. https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/percentile-points-from-1-to-99-for-total-income-before-and-after-tax
Organization logo

Table 3.1a Percentile points from 1 to 99 for total income before and after tax

Explore at:
54 scholarly articles cite this dataset (View in Google Scholar)
Dataset updated
Mar 12, 2025
Dataset provided by
GOV.UKhttp://gov.uk/
Authors
HM Revenue & Customs
Description

The table only covers individuals who have some liability to Income Tax. The percentile points have been independently calculated on total income before tax and total income after tax.

These statistics are classified as accredited official statistics.

You can find more information about these statistics and collated tables for the latest and previous tax years on the Statistics about personal incomes page.

Supporting documentation on the methodology used to produce these statistics is available in the release for each tax year.

Note: comparisons over time may be affected by changes in methodology. Notably, there was a revision to the grossing factors in the 2018 to 2019 publication, which is discussed in the commentary and supporting documentation for that tax year. Further details, including a summary of significant methodological changes over time, data suitability and coverage, are included in the Background Quality Report.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu