The Personal Income Tax Rate in Finland stands at 57.65 percent. This dataset provides - Finland Personal Income Tax Rate - actual values, historical data, forecast, chart, statistics, economic calendar and news.

The Corporate Tax Rate in Finland stands at 20 percent. This dataset provides - Finland Corporate Tax Rate - actual values, historical data, forecast, chart, statistics, economic calendar and news.

In 2023, income taxes made up the largest share of the government tax revenue in relation to GDP in Finland. Income taxes accounted for 15.4 percent of the GDP, and followed by taxes on goods and services with nearly 13 percent. Taxes gathered through social security contributions made up 12.1 percent of the GDP in 2023.

Key information about Finland Tax Revenue

• Finland Tax Revenue was reported at 24.463 USD bn in Dec 2024.
• This records an increase from the previous figure of 20.583 USD bn for Sep 2024.
• Finland Tax Revenue data is updated quarterly, averaging 19.177 USD bn from Mar 1999 to Dec 2024, with 104 observations.
• The data reached an all-time high of 25.700 USD bn in Dec 2021 and a record low of 9.452 USD bn in Dec 2001.
• Finland Tax Revenue data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by CEIC Data.
• The data is categorized under World Trend Plus’s Global Economic Monitor – Table: Tax Revenue: USD: Quarterly.

CEIC calculates quarterly Tax Revenue as the sum of Taxes on Production and Imports, Other Taxes on Production, Current Taxes on Income, Wealth, etc. and Tax on Capital and converts it into USD. Statistics Finland provides Tax Revenue in EUR. Federal Reserve Board average market exchange rate is used for currency conversions.

FI: Total Tax Rate: % of Profit data was reported at 38.400 % in 2017. This records an increase from the previous number of 38.100 % for 2016. FI: Total Tax Rate: % of Profit data is updated yearly, averaging 40.600 % from Dec 2005 (Median) to 2017, with 13 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 49.500 % in 2005 and a record low of 37.900 % in 2015. FI: Total Tax Rate: % of Profit data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Finland – Table FI.World Bank.WDI: Company Statistics. Total tax rate measures the amount of taxes and mandatory contributions payable by businesses after accounting for allowable deductions and exemptions as a share of commercial profits. Taxes withheld (such as personal income tax) or collected and remitted to tax authorities (such as value added taxes, sales taxes or goods and service taxes) are excluded.; ; World Bank, Doing Business project (http://www.doingbusiness.org/).; Unweighted average; Data are presented for the survey year instead of publication year.

The Withholding Tax Rate in Finland stands at 0 percent. This dataset includes a chart with historical data for Finland Withholding Tax Rate.

In 2023, the revenue collected from income taxes reached approximately 42.7 billion euros in Finland. That year, tax on goods and services generated roughly 36 billion euros and social security contributions roughly 33 billion euros of the general government revenue.

This statistic displays the corporate income tax (CIT) rate in selected Nordic countries in 2017. In Norway, the corporate income tax rate amounted to 24 percent. In both Sweden and Denmark the corporate income tax rate was 22 percent. Meanwhile, Finland had a CIT rate of 20 percent which was the lowest in the surveyed Nordic countries.

Corporate income tax refers to the fact that a business as a legal entity is taxed by a government. In the Nordics in principal, a tax resident company is generally subject to corporate income tax on its income world-wide.

Key information about Finland Tax revenue: % of GDP

• Finland Tax revenue: % of GDP was reported at 31.7 % in Dec 2024.
• This records an increase from the previous number of 27.3 % for Sep 2024.
• Finland Tax revenue: % of GDP data is updated quarterly, averaging 31.7 % from Mar 1999 to Dec 2024, with 104 observations.
• The data reached an all-time high of 37.9 % in Jun 2000 and a record low of 24.7 % in Dec 2009.
• Finland Tax revenue: % of GDP data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by CEIC Data.
• The data is categorized under World Trend Plus’s Global Economic Monitor – Table: Tax Revenue: % of Nominal GDP: Quarterly.

CEIC calculates quarterly Tax Revenue as % of Nominal GDP from quarterly Tax Revenue and quarterly Nominal GDP. Tax Revenue is calculated as Taxes on Production and Imports, Other Taxes on Production, Current Taxes on Income, Wealth, Etc and Tax on Capital. Statistics Finland provides Tax Revenue in EUR and Nominal GDP in EUR.

Over the period from 2013 to 2023, tax revenue collected by the general government in Finland increased overall. In 2023, the general government tax revenue amounted to nearly 115.9 billion euros.

Finland: Corporate tax rate: The latest value from is percent, unavailable from percent in . In comparison, the world average is 0 percent, based on data from countries. Historically, the average for Finland from to is 23 percent. The minimum value, 20 percent, was reached in 2014 while the maximum of 26 percent was recorded in 2006.

This statistic shows the value-added tax rates in Finland as of 2023, by type. The standard VAT rate applied on most goods and services was 24 percent. A reduced tax rate for groceries, fodder, restaurant and catering services stood at 14 percent.

Finland FI: Tax Payments data was reported at 8.000 Number in 2017. This stayed constant from the previous number of 8.000 Number for 2016. Finland FI: Tax Payments data is updated yearly, averaging 8.000 Number from Dec 2005 (Median) to 2017, with 13 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 20.000 Number in 2008 and a record low of 8.000 Number in 2017. Finland FI: Tax Payments data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Finland – Table FI.World Bank: Company Statistics. Tax payments by businesses are the total number of taxes paid by businesses, including electronic filing. The tax is counted as paid once a year even if payments are more frequent.; ; World Bank, Doing Business project (http://www.doingbusiness.org/).; Unweighted average; Data are presented for the survey year instead of publication year.

Tax rates of alcohol and alcoholic beverages in Finland increased in the beginning of the year 2024. The excise duty levied on beer was 36.2 cents per cl ethyl alcohol, and on wine 456 cents per cl ethyl alcohol.

Finland FI: Number of Visits or Required Meetings with Tax Officials: Average for Affected Firms data was reported at 1.400 NA in 2020. Finland FI: Number of Visits or Required Meetings with Tax Officials: Average for Affected Firms data is updated yearly, averaging 1.400 NA from Dec 2020 (Median) to 2020, with 1 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 1.400 NA in 2020 and a record low of 1.400 NA in 2020. Finland FI: Number of Visits or Required Meetings with Tax Officials: Average for Affected Firms data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Finland – Table FI.World Bank.WDI: Company Statistics. Average number of visits or required meetings with tax officials during the year. The value represents the average number of visits for all firms which reported being visited or required to meet with tax officials (please see indicator IC.FRM.METG.ZS).;World Bank, Enterprise Surveys (http://www.enterprisesurveys.org/).;Unweighted average;

This statistic shows the results of a survey conducted by Cint on the distribution of personal income levels before tax in Finland in 2018. During the survey, 30.27 percent of respondents stated that their personal income before tax is between 20,000 and 40,000 Euros.

Taking out base price, the most expensive types of cars to own in Finland are by far the SUVs. The total tax cost (including VAT) of the compact petrol SUVs was greatest with a net of 24,500 euros over 10 years, without the base price. The least costly was the small battery-electric car, with taxes of 8euros. Factoring in base price, the small petrol car was least expensive to own, at a total of 25,800 euros.

Abstract copyright UK Data Service and data collection copyright owner.

The OECD Tax Statistics provide detailed annual information on tax and other government revenues for the period 1955 onwards for all OECD countries (where data is available).

The OECD Tax Statistics are presented in the following datasets (some tables will include missing data):

Revenue Statistics

Data on government sector receipts and on taxes in particular, are basic inputs to most structural economic descriptions and economic analyses and are increasingly used in international comparisons. These databases give a conceptual framework to define which government receipts should be regarded as taxes and to classify different types of taxes. They present a unique set of detailed and internationally comparable tax data in a common format for all OECD countries from 1955 onwards. The countries covered are Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Chile, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, Mexico, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, United Kingdom, and United States.

Revenue Statistics in Latin America

Data on government sector receipts and on taxes in particular, are basic inputs to most structural economic descriptions and economic analyses and are increasingly used in international comparisons. These databases give a conceptual framework to define which government receipts should be regarded as taxes and to classify different types of taxes. The data covers the years starting from 1990 extending until 2010. The countries covered are Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Guatemala, Mexico, Peru, Uruguay and Venezuela.

Taxing Wages

Taxing Wages provides unique information on income tax paid by workers and on social security contributions levied upon employees and their employers in OECD countries. Family benefits paid as cash transfers are specified. Amounts of taxes and benefits are detailed programme by programme, for eight household types which differ by income level and household composition. Results reported include the marginal and effective tax burden for one- and two-earner families, and total labour costs of employers. The data covers the years starting from 2000 extending until 2012. The countries covered are Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Chile, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, Mexico, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, United Kingdom, and United States.

Taxes and benefits

The Benefits and Wages series addresses the complicated interactions of tax and benefit systems for different family types and labour market situations. The series is a valuable tool used to compare the different benefits made available to those without work and those with different levels of in-work income. It covers 37 countries (29 OECD countries and from 2005 Cyprus, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta and Slovenia and from 2008 Bulgaria and Romania) for the period 2001-2008. The main social policy areas are as follows: taxes and social security contributions due on earnings and benefits, unemployment benefits, social assistance, family benefits, housing benefits, and in-work benefits. These social policies can be further examined by family type, number of children, first earner, second earner and employment status, 2007 edition of Benefits and Wages, statistics, country specific files and tax-benefit models and calculator, which provide detailed descriptions of all cash benefits available to those in and out of work as well as the taxes they were liable to pay are available on Benefits and Wages. OECD Indicators Data are presented from 2001 onwards. The countries covered are Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Chile, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, Mexico, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, United Kingdom, United States, Bulgaria, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta and Romania.

Fiscal decentralisation

This database includes intergovernmental grants by type and by function as well as tax autonomy:

The intergovernmental grants by type dataset includes statistics on intergovernmental grants by type where the two core types are earmarked which are conditional grants (mandatory, matching, current, capital, non-matching, discretionary) and non-earmarked which are unconditional grants (mandatory, general purpose, block grants, discretionary). Grants type can be...

Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) in Finland was reported at 36.6 % in 2019, according to the World Bank collection of development indicators, compiled from officially recognized sources. Finland - Total tax rate (% of profit) - actual values, historical data, forecasts and projections were sourced from the World Bank on June of 2025.

The main themes of this survey were social welfare policy, taxation, political lobbying and influence, policies of the future government, candidate choice in the forthcoming parliamentary elections, and options for lengthening working lives in Finland. First, the respondents were asked whether they agreed with a number of statements relating to political decision-making, climate change, political parties, politics, economic and fiscal policy, Finnish economy, working life, NATO membership, welfare, entrepreneurship, national identity, etc. Opinions were charted on which tax rates (income tax, corporate tax, excise duty on alcoholic beverages, value-added tax rates etc) could be increased, kept at the same level or lowered. The respondents were also asked how they would rank Finland compared to other countries regarding a number of issues. The issues mentioned included, for instance, how well the political system, democracy and society on the whole work; material and mental well-being; the quality of education, social security and public services; Finland's image; economic competitiveness; equality; safety; income differences; amount of corruption. The next set of questions probed views on how much certain bodies/operators (trade unions, employer organisations, public authorities, big businesses, the media, market forces, the EU, the EMU, lobby groups, voters etc) influenced political decisions in Finland and whether their influence was too great, appropriate or too low. Opinions were charted on what should be the focus areas for the future government (e.g. economy, employment, national debt, poverty, education, crime prevention, business environment, immigration). One theme pertained to the forthcoming parliamentary elections. The respondents were asked how important certain aspects were for their candidate choice. The aspects mentioned included, for instance, the candidate image, party, charisma, expertise, values, image given on the Internet or in the social media, the candidate's gender, age, honesty, verbal skills. Opinions were charted on what would be good methods for lenghtening people's working lives (e.g. restricting access to early retirement, raising retirement age, abolishing conscription, measures to shorten unemployment periods, immigration, restricting access to unemployment benefits etc). The survey also investigated attitudes to Finland's EU membership, change of currency to euro, and whether the EMU membership was a benefit or disadvantage to Finland in the economic situation at that time. Background variables included the respondent's gender, age group, basic and vocational education, size and type of the municipality of residence, industry of employment, region, economic activity and occupational status, trade union membership, self-perceived social class and the candidate of which political party R would vote for if the parliamentary elections were held at that time.