The main stock market index of United States, the US500, rose to 6008 points on June 9, 2025, gaining 0.13% from the previous session. Over the past month, the index has climbed 2.80% and is up 12.07% compared to the same time last year, according to trading on a contract for difference (CFD) that tracks this benchmark index from United States. United States Stock Market Index - values, historical data, forecasts and news - updated on June of 2025.

The Case Mix Index (CMI) is the average relative DRG weight of a hospital’s inpatient discharges, calculated by summing the Medicare Severity-Diagnosis Related Group (MS-DRG) weight for each discharge and dividing the total by the number of discharges. The CMI reflects the diversity, clinical complexity, and resource needs of all the patients in the hospital. A higher CMI indicates a more complex and resource-intensive case load. Although the MS-DRG weights, provided by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), were designed for the Medicare population, they are applied here to all discharges regardless of payer. Note: It is not meaningful to add the CMI values together.

This dataset provides values for INDEX reported in several countries. The data includes current values, previous releases, historical highs and record lows, release frequency, reported unit and currency.

View data of the S&P 500, an index of the stocks of 500 leading companies in the US economy, which provides a gauge of the U.S. equity market.

China's main stock market index, the SHANGHAI, rose to 3385 points on June 6, 2025, gaining 0.04% from the previous session. Over the past month, the index has climbed 1.28% and is up 10.95% compared to the same time last year, according to trading on a contract for difference (CFD) that tracks this benchmark index from China. China Shanghai Composite Stock Market Index - values, historical data, forecasts and news - updated on June of 2025.

The Gender Equality Index is a tool to measure the progress of gender equality in the EU, developed by EIGE. It gives more visibility to areas that need improvement and ultimately supports policy makers to design more effective gender equality measures.

The Gender Equality Index has tracked the painfully slow progress of gender equality in the EU since 2010, mostly due to advances in decision-making. While equality is more pronounced in some Member States than in others, it is far from a reality for everyone in every area. Gender norms around care, gender segregation in education and the labour market, and gender inequalities in pay remain pertinent.

The Index allows Member States to easily monitor and compare gender equality progress across various groups of women and men in the EU over time and to understand where improvements are most needed. The 2022 Index has a thematic focus on care in the Covid-19 pandemic. It explores the division of informal childcare, long-term care and housework between women and men.

The Gender Equality Index is a composite indicator. With a total of six core domains (work, money, knowledge, time, power and health) and two satellite domains (violence against women and intersecting inequalities), it offers a synthetic and easy-to-interpret measure for gender equality, indicating how far (or close) the EU and its Member States are from achieving gender equality on a scale of 1 to 100.

Building on previous editions alongside EIGE’s approach to ensuring intersecting inequalities are captured, the Gender Equality Index 2022 continues to show the diverse realities that different groups of women and men face. It examines how elements such as disability, age, level of education, country of birth and family type can intersect with gender and create many different kinds of pathways in people's lives.

Analysis of ‘Property Prices Index By City 2009 to 2021’ provided by Analyst-2 (analyst-2.ai), based on source dataset retrieved from https://www.kaggle.com/jolenech/property-prices-index-by-city-2009-to-2021 on 13 February 2022.

--- Dataset description provided by original source is as follows ---

Context

I wanted to see how affordable housing is across countries and wanted to compare the price of housing. But I could not find a properly documented and easily downloaded dataset hence I created one with the help of web-scraping with Python and Pandas.

Content

I spent a lot of time searching for a source for the information I wanted in order to compare affordability. I stumbled upon a great website which was exactly what I was looking for Numbeo The website has a lot of details like affordability index, prime to income ratio, price to rent ratios in and out of city centre and more!

Now I had the data, I needed to download it. Since I couldn't get the raw form of the data, I did web scraping in order to get details in the table for 2009 to 2021 using a for loop to go through all links and create csv files for every year.

What's in the dataset?

Details of columns Note: There are a few null values in the 2009 dataset (mortgage and Affordability Index columns.

Check out the code I used on Github.

Acknowledgements

I couldn't have gotten the data without Numbeo!

Inspiration

I was working on a project trying to see if Price of Housing in Singapore can be justified and wanted more data that's global instead of just from Singapore. Let me know if you have any questions!

--- Original source retains full ownership of the source dataset ---

Updated investor sentiment index dataset up to December 2014 (including both Baker and Wurgler's sentiment index, and Huang, Jiang, Tu and Zhou (2015 RFS)'s investor sentiment index)

SCHOOL PROFICIENCY INDEXSummaryThe school proficiency index uses school-level data on the performance of 4th grade students on state exams to describe which neighborhoods have high-performing elementary schools nearby and which are near lower performing elementary schools. The school proficiency index is a function of the percent of 4th grade students proficient in reading (r) and math (m) on state test scores for up to three schools (i=1,2,3) within 1.5 miles of the block-group centroid. S denotes 4th grade school enrollment:Elementary schools are linked with block-groups based on a geographic mapping of attendance area zones from School Attendance Boundary Information System (SABINS), where available, or within-district proximity matches of up to the three-closest schools within 1.5 miles. In cases with multiple school matches, an enrollment-weighted score is calculated following the equation above. Please note that in this version of the data (AFFHT0004), there is no school proficiency data for jurisdictions in Kansas, West Virginia, and Puerto Rico because no data was reported for jurisdictions in these states in the Great Schools 2013-14 dataset. InterpretationValues are percentile ranked and range from 0 to 100. The higher the score, the higher the school system quality is in a neighborhood. Data Source: Great Schools (proficiency data, 2015-16); Common Core of Data (4th grade school addresses and enrollment, 2015-16); Maponics (attendance boundaries, 2016).Related AFFH-T Local Government, PHA and State Tables/Maps: Table 12; Map 7.

To learn more about the School Proficiency Index visit: https://www.hud.gov/program_offices/fair_housing_equal_opp/affh ; https://www.hud.gov/sites/dfiles/FHEO/documents/AFFH-T-Data-Documentation-AFFHT0006-July-2020.pdf, for questions about the spatial attribution of this dataset, please reach out to us at GISHelpdesk@hud.gov. Date of Coverage: 07/2020

Few concepts figure more prominently in the study of international politics than threat. Yet scholars do not agree on how to identify and measure threats or systematically incorporate leaders’ perceptions of threat into their models. In this research note, we introduce a text-based strategy and method for identifying and measuring elite assessments of international threat from publicly available sources. Using semi-supervised machine learning models, we show how text sourced from newspaper articles can be parsed to discern arguments that distinguish threatening from non-threatening states, and to measure and track variation in the intensity of foreign threats over time. To demonstrate proof of concept, we use news summaries from The New York Times from 1861 to 2017 to create a geopolitical threat index (GTI) for the United States. We show that the index successfully matches periods in US history that historians identify as high and low threat and correctly identifies countries that have posed a threat to US security at different points in its history. We compare and contrast GTI with traditional indicators of international threat that rely on measures of material capability and interstate behavior.

Systemic immune inflammation index, systemic inflammatory response index and pan-immune inflammation value in predicting nausea and vomiting in pregnancy and the need for hospitalization Abstract Objective To investigate the role of the systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), systemic inflammatory response index (SIRI) and pan-immune inflammation value (PIV) in predicting nausea and vomiting in pregnancy (NVP). Study Design Women diagnosed and treated for NVP at a large tertiary hospital between 2016 and 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. After applying the inclusion criteria, a total of 278 eligible patients with NVP and 278 gestational age-matched healthy pregnant women were included. Patients with NVP were divided into mild (n=58), moderate (n=140) and severe NVP (n=80). Patients with moderate and/or severe NVP who were at high risk for hospitalization were pooled and assigned to an inpatient treatment group. The data from the first trimester of the groups were then compared. Results SII and PIV were significantly higher in the NVP group than in the control group, while SII, SIRI and PIV were significantly higher in the inpatient treatment group than in the mild NVP group. The comparison of overall performance in predicting the development of NVP showed that SII was better than PIV (p1207x103/µL (47.48% sensitivity, 82.01% specificity) had the highest discriminatory power for predicting NVP. Conclusion Our results suggest an association between high SII and PIV and an increased risk of future NVP. These markers can be used as a first-trimester screening test to improve treatment planning of pregnancies at high risk of HG.

SpaceKnow uses satellite (SAR) data to capture activity in electric vehicles and automotive factories.

Data is updated daily, has an average lag of 4-6 days, and history back to 2017.

The insights provide you with level and change data that monitors the area which is covered with assembled light vehicles in square meters.

We offer 3 delivery options: CSV, API, and Insights Dashboard

Available companies Rivian (NASDAQ: RIVN) for employee parking, logistics, logistic centers, product distribution & product in the US. (See use-case write up on page 4) TESLA (NASDAQ: TSLA) indices for product, logistics & employee parking for Fremont, Nevada, Shanghai, Texas, Berlin, and Global level Lucid Motors (NASDAQ: LCID) for employee parking, logistics & product in US

Why get SpaceKnow's EV datasets?

Monitor the company’s business activity: Near-real-time insights into the business activities of Rivian allow users to better understand and anticipate the company’s performance.

Assess Risk: Use satellite activity data to assess the risks associated with investing in the company.

Types of Indices Available Continuous Feed Index (CFI) is a daily aggregation of the area of metallic objects in square meters. There are two types of CFI indices. The first one is CFI-R which gives you level data, so it shows how many square meters are covered by metallic objects (for example assembled cars). The second one is CFI-S which gives you change data, so it shows you how many square meters have changed within the locations between two consecutive satellite images.

How to interpret the data SpaceKnow indices can be compared with the related economic indicators or KPIs. If the economic indicator is in monthly terms, perform a 30-day rolling sum and pick the last day of the month to compare with the economic indicator. Each data point will reflect approximately the sum of the month. If the economic indicator is in quarterly terms, perform a 90-day rolling sum and pick the last day of the 90-day to compare with the economic indicator. Each data point will reflect approximately the sum of the quarter.

Product index This index monitors the area covered by manufactured cars. The larger the area covered by the assembled cars, the larger and faster the production of a particular facility. The index rises as production increases.

Product distribution index This index monitors the area covered by assembled cars that are ready for distribution. The index covers locations in the Rivian factory. The distribution is done via trucks and trains.

Employee parking index Like the previous index, this one indicates the area covered by cars, but those that belong to factory employees. This index is a good indicator of factory construction, closures, and capacity utilization. The index rises as more employees work in the factory.

Logistics index The index monitors the movement of materials supply trucks in particular car factories.

Logistics Centers index The index monitors the movement of supply trucks in warehouses.

Where the data comes from: SpaceKnow brings you information advantages by applying machine learning and AI algorithms to synthetic aperture radar and optical satellite imagery. The company’s infrastructure searches and downloads new imagery every day, and the computations of the data take place within less than 24 hours.

In contrast to traditional economic data, which are released in monthly and quarterly terms, SpaceKnow data is high-frequency and available daily. It is possible to observe the latest movements in the EV industry with just a 4-6 day lag, on average.

The EV data help you to estimate the performance of the EV sector and the business activity of the selected companies.

The backbone of SpaceKnow’s high-quality data is the locations from which data is extracted. All locations are thoroughly researched and validated by an in-house team of annotators and data analysts.

Each individual location is precisely defined so that the resulting data does not contain noise such as surrounding traffic or changing vegetation with the season.

We use radar imagery and our own algorithms, so the final indices are not devalued by weather conditions such as rain or heavy clouds.

→ Reach out to get a free trial

Use Case - Rivian:

SpaceKnow uses the quarterly production and delivery data of Rivian as a benchmark. Rivian targeted to produce 25,000 cars in 2022. To achieve this target, the company had to increase production by 45% by producing 10,683 cars in Q4. However the production was 10,020 and the target was slightly missed by reaching total production of 24,337 cars for FY22.

SpaceKnow indices help us to observe the company’s operations, and we are able to monitor if the company is set to meet its forecasts or not. We deliver five different indices for Rivian, and these indices observe logistic centers, employee parking lot, logistics, product, and prod...

Context:

The Bureau of Labor Statistics defines the Consumer Price Index (CPI) as “a statistical measure of change, over time, of the prices of goods and services in major expenditure groups--such as food, housing, apparel, transportation, and medical care--typically purchased by urban consumers. Essentially, it compares the cost of a sample of goods and services in a specific month relative to the cost of the same "market basket" in an earlier reference period.

Make sure to read the cu.txt for more descriptive summaries on each data file and how to use the unique identifiers.

Content:

This dataset was collected June 27th, 2017 and may not be up-to-date.

The revised CPI introduced by the BLS in 1998 includes indexes for two populations; urban wage earners and clerical workers (CW), and all urban consumers (CU). This dataset covers all urban consumers (CU).

The Consumer Price Index (CPI) is a statistical measure of change, over time, of the prices of goods and services in major expenditure groups--such as food, housing, apparel, transportation, and medical care--typically purchased by urban consumers. Essentially, it compares the cost of a sample "market basket" of goods and services in a specific month relative to the cost of the same "market basket" in an earlier reference period. This reference period is designated as the base period.

As a result of the 1998 revision, both the CW and the CU utilize updated expenditure weights based upon data tabulated from three years (1982, 1983, and 1984) of the Consumer Expenditure Survey and incorporate a number of technical improvements, including an updated and revised item structure.

To construct the two indexes, prices for about 100,000 items and data on about 8,300 housing units are collected in a sample of 91 urban places. Comparison of indexes for individual CMSA's or cities show only the relative change over time in prices between locations. These indexes cannot be used to measure interarea differences in price levels or living costs.

Summary Data Available: U.S. average indexes for both populations are available for about 305 consumer items and groups of items. In addition, over 100 of the indexes have been adjusted for seasonality. The indexes are monthly with some beginning in 1913. Semi-annual indexes have been calculated for about 100 items for comparison with semi-annual areas mentioned below. Semi-annual indexes are available from 1984 forward.

Area indexes for both populations are available for 26 urban places. For each area, indexes are published for about 42 items and groups. The indexes are published monthly for three areas, bimonthly for eleven areas, and semi-annually for 12 urban areas.

Regional indexes for both populations are available for four regions with about 55 items and groups per region. Beginning with January 1987, indexes are monthly, with some beginning as early as 1966. Semi-annual indexes have been calculated for about 42 items for comparison with semi-annual areas mentioned above. Semi-annual indexes have been calculated for about 42 items in the 27 urban places for comparison with semi-annual areas.

City-size indexes for both populations are available for three size classes with about 55 items and groups per class. Beginning with January 1987, indexes are monthly and most begin in 1977. Semi-annual indexes have been calculated for about 42 items for comparison with semi-annual areas mentioned below.

Region/city-size indexes for both populations are available cross classified by region and city-size class. For each of 13 cross calculations, about 42 items and groups are available. Beginning with January 1987, indexes are monthly and most begin in 1977. Semi-annual indexes have been calculated for about 42 items in the 26 urban places for comparison with semi-annual areas.

Frequency of Observations: U.S. city average indexes, some area indexes, and regional indexes, city-size indexes, and region/city-size indexes for both populations are monthly. Other area indexes for both populations are bimonthly or semi-annual.

Annual Averages: Annual averages are available for all unadjusted series in the CW and CU.

Base Periods: Most indexes have a base period of 1982-1984 = 100. Other indexes, mainly those which have been added to the CPI program with the 1998 revision, are based more recently. The base period value is 100.0, except for the "Purchasing Power" values (AAOR and SAOR) where the base period value is 1.000.

Data Characteristics: Indexes are stored to one decimal place, except for the "Purchasing Power" values which are stored to three decimal places.

References: BLS Handbook of Methods, Chapter 17, "Consumer Price Index", BLS Bulletin 2285, April 1988.

Acknowledgements:

This dataset was taken directly from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics web...

This dataset provides values for DALLAS FED SERVICES INDEX reported in several countries. The data includes current values, previous releases, historical highs and record lows, release frequency, reported unit and currency.

The Kirwan Institute for the Study of Race and Ethnicity at Ohio State University developed the Detroit Regional Opportunity Index to compare levels of opportunity for people growing up in different parts of a region. The Index was developed by combining many different data indicators for opportunity into a single score. More information on the Detroit methodology and composite data can be found here: http://kirwaninstitute.osu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/20131211neighborhood.pdf

The full report from Kirwan on the Detroit Opportunity project can be found here: http://kirwaninstitute.osu.edu/?my-product=opportunity-for-all-inequity-linked-fate-and-social-justice-in-detroit-and-michigan/

The National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) data incorporates all Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map(DFIRM) databases published by FEMA, and any Letters Of Map Revision (LOMRs) that have been issued against those databases since their publication date. The DFIRM Database is the digital, geospatial version of the flood hazard information shown on the published paper Flood Insurance Rate Maps(FIRMs). The primary risk classifications used are the 1-percent-annual-chance flood event, the 0.2-percent-annual-chance flood event, and areas of minimal flood risk. The NFHL data are derived from Flood Insurance Studies (FISs), previously published Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs), flood hazard analyses performed in support of the FISs and FIRMs, and new mapping data where available. The FISs and FIRMs are published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). The specifications for the horizontal control of DFIRM data are consistent with those required for mapping at a scale of 1:12,000. The NFHL data contain layers in the Standard DFIRM datasets except for S_Label_Pt and S_Label_Ld. The NFHL is available as State or US Territory data sets. Each State or Territory data set consists of all DFIRMs and corresponding LOMRs available on the publication date of the data set.

The datasets below have been archived and will not receive further updates, but remain available for reference. The up-to-date and more comprehensive Litter Index is available here and will be updated annually going forward. For those conducting analysis using Litter Index data, please be advised that the survey design between the 2007- 2015 data is vastly different from the 2017 data, so it would not make sense to compare the two.

The Litter Index is used to compare the relative cleanliness of different areas of the city of Philadelphia.

Trouble downloading or have questions about this City dataset? Visit the OpenDataPhilly Discussion Group

This dataset is about books, has 1 rows and is filtered where the book is Index data structures in object-oriented databases. It features 7 columns including book, author, publication date, language, and book publisher. The preview is ordered by publication date (descending).

Leaf Area Index (LAI) is a fundamental vegetation structural variable that drives energy and mass exchanges between the plant and the atmosphere. Moderate-resolution (300m – 7km) global LAI data products have been widely applied to track global vegetation changes, drive Earth system models, monitor crop growth and productivity, etc. Yet, cutting-edge applications in climate adaptation, hydrology, and sustainable agriculture require LAI information at higher spatial resolution (< 100m) to model and understand heterogeneous landscapes. This dataset was built to assist a machine-learning-based approach for mapping LAI from 30m-resolution Landsat images across the contiguous US (CONUS). The data was derived from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) Version 6 LAI/FPAR, Landsat Collection 1 surface reflectance, and NLCD Land Cover datasets over 2006 – 2018 using Google Earth Engine. Each record/sample/row includes a MODIS LAI value, corresponding Landsat surface reflectance in green, red, NIR, SWIR1 bands, a land cover (biome) type, geographic location, and other auxiliary information. Each sample represents a MODIS LAI pixel (500m) within which a single biome type dominates 90% of the area. The spatial homogeneity of the samples was further controlled by a screening process based on the coefficient of variation of the Landsat surface reflectance. In total, there are approximately 1.6 million samples, stratified by biome, Landsat sensor, and saturation status from the MODIS LAI algorithm. This dataset can be used to train machine learning models and generate LAI maps for Landsat 5, 7, 8 surface reflectance images within CONUS. Detailed information on the sample generation and quality control can be found in the related journal article. Resources in this dataset:Resource Title: README. File Name: LAI_train_samples_CONUS_README.txtResource Description: Description and metadata of the main datasetResource Software Recommended: Notepad,url: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/p/windows-notepad/9msmlrh6lzf3?activetab=pivot:overviewtab Resource Title: LAI_training_samples_CONUS. File Name: LAI_train_samples_CONUS_v0.1.1.csvResource Description: This CSV file consists of the training samples for estimating Leaf Area Index based on Landsat surface reflectance images (Collection 1 Tire 1). Each sample has a MODIS LAI value and corresponding surface reflectance derived from Landsat pixels within the MODIS pixel. Contact: Yanghui Kang (kangyanghui@gmail.com)
Column description

UID: Unique identifier. Format: LATITUDE_LONGITUDE_SENSOR_PATHROW_DATE
Landsat_ID: Landsat image ID Date: Landsat image date in "YYYYMMDD" Latitude: Latitude (WGS84) of the MODIS LAI pixel center Longitude: Longitude (WGS84) of the MODIS LAI pixel center MODIS_LAI: MODIS LAI value in "m2/m2" MODIS_LAI_std: MODIS LAI standard deviation in "m2/m2" MODIS_LAI_sat: 0 - MODIS Main (RT) method used no saturation; 1 - MODIS Main (RT) method with saturation NLCD_class: Majority class code from the National Land Cover Dataset (NLCD) NLCD_frequency: Percentage of the area cover by the majority class from NLCD Biome: Biome type code mapped from NLCD (see below for more information) Blue: Landsat surface reflectance in the blue band Green: Landsat surface reflectance in the green band Red: Landsat surface reflectance in the red band Nir: Landsat surface reflectance in the near infrared band Swir1: Landsat surface reflectance in the shortwave infrared 1 band Swir2: Landsat surface reflectance in the shortwave infrared 2 band Sun_zenith: Solar zenith angle from the Landsat image metadata. This is a scene-level value. Sun_azimuth: Solar azimuth angle from the Landsat image metadata. This is a scene-level value. NDVI: Normalized Difference Vegetation Index computed from Landsat surface reflectance EVI: Enhanced Vegetation Index computed from Landsat surface reflectance NDWI: Normalized Difference Water Index computed from Landsat surface reflectance GCI: Green Chlorophyll Index = Nir/Green - 1

Biome code

1 - Deciduous Forest
2 - Evergreen Forest
3 - Mixed Forest
4 - Shrubland
5 - Grassland/Pasture
6 - Cropland
7 - Woody Wetland
8 - Herbaceous Wetland

Reference Dataset: All data was accessed through Google Earth Engine Gorelick, N., Hancher, M., Dixon, M., Ilyushchenko, S., Thau, D., & Moore, R. (2017). Google Earth Engine: Planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone. Remote Sensing of Environment. MODIS Version 6 Leaf Area Index/FPAR 4-day L5 Global 500m Myneni, R., Y. Knyazikhin, T. Park. MOD15A2H MODIS/Terra Leaf Area Index/FPAR 8-Day L4 Global 500m SIN Grid V006. 2015, distributed by NASA EOSDIS Land Processes DAAC, https://doi.org/10.5067/MODIS/MOD15A2H.006 Landsat 5/7/8 Collection 1 Surface Reflectance Landsat Level-2 Surface Reflectance Science Product courtesy of the U.S. Geological Survey. Masek, J.G., Vermote, E.F., Saleous N.E., Wolfe, R., Hall, F.G., Huemmrich, K.F., Gao, F., Kutler, J., and Lim, T-K. (2006). A Landsat surface reflectance dataset for North America, 1990–2000. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters 3(1):68-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2005.857030. Vermote, E., Justice, C., Claverie, M., & Franch, B. (2016). Preliminary analysis of the performance of the Landsat 8/OLI land surface reflectance product. Remote Sensing of Environment. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2016.04.008. National Land Cover Dataset (NLCD) Yang, Limin, Jin, Suming, Danielson, Patrick, Homer, Collin G., Gass, L., Bender, S.M., Case, Adam, Costello, C., Dewitz, Jon A., Fry, Joyce A., Funk, M., Granneman, Brian J., Liknes, G.C., Rigge, Matthew B., Xian, George, A new generation of the United States National Land Cover Database—Requirements, research priorities, design, and implementation strategies: ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, v. 146, p. 108–123, at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2018.09.006 Resource Software Recommended: Microsoft Excel,url: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/excel

Abstract

The Global Data Regulation Diagnostic provides a comprehensive assessment of the quality of the data governance environment. Diagnostic results show that countries have put in greater effort in adopting enabler regulatory practices than in safeguard regulatory practices. However, for public intent data, enablers for private intent data, safeguards for personal and nonpersonal data, cybersecurity and cybercrime, as well as cross-border data flows. Across all these dimensions, no income group demonstrates advanced regulatory frameworks across all dimensions, indicating significant room for the regulatory development of both enablers and safeguards remains at an intermediate stage: 47 percent of enabler good practices and 41 percent of good safeguard practices are adopted across countries. Under the enabler and safeguard pillars, the diagnostic covers dimensions of e-commerce/e-transactions, enablers further improvement on data governance environment.

The Global Data Regulation Diagnostic is the first comprehensive assessment of laws and regulations on data governance. It covers enabler and safeguard regulatory practices in 80 countries providing indicators to assess and compare their performance. This Global Data Regulation Diagnostic develops objective and standardized indicators to measure the regulatory environment for the data economy across countries. The indicators aim to serve as a diagnostic tool so countries can assess and compare their performance vis-á-vis other countries. Understanding the gap with global regulatory good practices is a necessary first step for governments when identifying and prioritizing reforms.

Geographic coverage

80 countries

Analysis unit

Country

Kind of data

Observation data/ratings [obs]

Sampling procedure

The diagnostic is based on a detailed assessment of domestic laws, regulations, and administrative requirements in 80 countries selected to ensure a balanced coverage across income groups, regions, and different levels of digital technology development. Data are further verified through a detailed desk research of legal texts, reflecting the regulatory status of each country as of June 1, 2020.

Mode of data collection

Mail Questionnaire [mail]

Research instrument

The questionnaire comprises 37 questions designed to determine if a country has adopted good regulatory practice on data governance. The responses are then scored and assigned a normative interpretation. Related questions fall into seven clusters so that when the scores are averaged, each cluster provides an overall sense of how it performs in its corresponding regulatory and legal dimensions. These seven dimensions are: (1) E-commerce/e-transaction; (2) Enablers for public intent data; (3) Enablers for private intent data; (4) Safeguards for personal data; (5) Safeguards for nonpersonal data; (6) Cybersecurity and cybercrime; (7) Cross-border data transfers.

Response rate

100%