In 2022, Saudi Arabia had a final market score of ** which was the highest among eight select economies in the Middle East and North Africa. Egypt and Turkey had a relative similar score at ** and **, respectively. Tunisia had the lowest market score among the select countries with **.

Italy Import Unit Value Index: Middle East data was reported at 200.500 2005=100 in Nov 2012. This records a decrease from the previous number of 203.000 2005=100 for Oct 2012. Italy Import Unit Value Index: Middle East data is updated monthly, averaging 80.100 2005=100 from Jan 1996 (Median) to Nov 2012, with 203 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 214.800 2005=100 in Apr 2012 and a record low of 26.900 2005=100 in Dec 1998. Italy Import Unit Value Index: Middle East data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by National Institute of Statistics. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Italy – Table IT.JA033: Trade Index: Unit Value and Volume Index: 2005=100: By Countries: Nace Rev.2.

Italy Export Volume Index: Middle East data was reported at 108.100 2005=100 in Nov 2012. This records a decrease from the previous number of 112.600 2005=100 for Oct 2012. Italy Export Volume Index: Middle East data is updated monthly, averaging 95.400 2005=100 from Jan 1996 (Median) to Nov 2012, with 203 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 144.800 2005=100 in Jul 2008 and a record low of 58.700 2005=100 in Aug 1999. Italy Export Volume Index: Middle East data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by National Institute of Statistics. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Italy – Table IT.JA033: Trade Index: Unit Value and Volume Index: 2005=100: By Countries: Nace Rev.2.

Italy Export Unit Value Index: Middle East data was reported at 156.400 2005=100 in Nov 2012. This records an increase from the previous number of 152.700 2005=100 for Oct 2012. Italy Export Unit Value Index: Middle East data is updated monthly, averaging 93.500 2005=100 from Jan 1996 (Median) to Nov 2012, with 203 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 157.200 2005=100 in Jan 2012 and a record low of 72.700 2005=100 in Sep 1998. Italy Export Unit Value Index: Middle East data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by National Institute of Statistics. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Italy – Table IT.JA033: Trade Index: Unit Value and Volume Index: 2005=100: By Countries: Nace Rev.2.

The statistic shows the ranking of the belt and road index (BARI) in the Middle East and North African region in 2019, broken down by country. In that year, the United Arab Emirates ranked second with an index score of ****, followed by Qatar ranked fifth with an index score of ****.

The average for 2023 based on 18 countries was 0.754 points. The highest value was in the United Arab Emirates: 0.94 points and the lowest value was in Yemen: 0.47 points. The indicator is available from 1980 to 2023. Below is a chart for all countries where data are available.

Italy Import Volume Index: Middle East data was reported at 99.600 2005=100 in Nov 2012. This records a decrease from the previous number of 102.500 2005=100 for Oct 2012. Italy Import Volume Index: Middle East data is updated monthly, averaging 96.500 2005=100 from Jan 1996 (Median) to Nov 2012, with 203 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 155.800 2005=100 in Jul 2011 and a record low of 55.900 2005=100 in Aug 1996. Italy Import Volume Index: Middle East data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by National Institute of Statistics. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Italy – Table IT.JA033: Trade Index: Unit Value and Volume Index: 2005=100: By Countries: Nace Rev.2.

Graph and download economic data for Inflation, consumer prices for Developing Countries in Middle East and North Africa (FPCPITOTLZGMNA) from 1970 to 2024 about North Africa, Middle East, consumer prices, consumer, and inflation.

This statistic shows the leading countries in the Middle East and Africa in the Travel & Tourism Competitiveness Index (TTCI) in 2018. Bahrain received a Travel & Tourism Competitiveness Index score of *** out of seven in the 2018 index.

The twenty countries with the worst human rights and rule of law index scores are located in Asia, Africa, Europe, the Middle East, and South America. On a scale from zero to ten, being zero the best human rights and rule of law conditions, Iran had the maximum index score, followed by Burma and China. On the contrary, Norway was the best country for human rights and rule of law.

The 2012 GHI report focuses particularly on the issue of how to ensure sustainable food security under conditions of water, land, and energy stress. Demographic changes, rising incomes and associated consumption patterns, and climate change, alongside persistent poverty and inadequate policies and institutions, are all placing serious pressure on natural resources. In this report, IFPRI describes the evidence on land, water, and energy scarcity in developing countries and offers two visions of a future global food system—an unsustainable scenario in which current trends in resource use continue, and a sustainable scenario in which access to food, modern energy, and clean water improves significantly and ecosystem degradation is halted or reversed. Concern Worldwide and Welthungerhilfe provide on-the-ground perspectives on the issues of land tenure and title as well as the impacts of scarce land, water, and energy on poor people in Sierra Leone and Tanzania and describe the work of their organizations in helping to alleviate these impacts. See other formats of data here: Linked Open Data (LOD) -- [OWL Version] and [RDF Version] See visual data at: Data Visualization

This statistic shows the economic complexity indices in the Middle East and North Africa region in 2017, by country. In 2017, the economic complexity index for Saudi Arabia was approximately ****.

This dataset provides values for MANUFACTURING PMI reported in several countries. The data includes current values, previous releases, historical highs and record lows, release frequency, reported unit and currency.

In 2021, Sudan and Yemen had the highest climate change risk index in the Middle East and North Africa region, at *** and ***, respectively. Saudi Arabia had the highest CCRI amongst Gulf Cooperation Council countries, at ***. GCC countries had a CCRI of *** or below which was the lowest in the region.

The average for 2023 based on 193 countries was -0.07 points. The highest value was in Liechtenstein: 1.61 points and the lowest value was in Syria: -2.75 points. The indicator is available from 1996 to 2023. Below is a chart for all countries where data are available.

The global gender gap index benchmarks national gender gaps on economic, political, education, and health-based criteria. In 2025, the country offering the most gender equal conditions was Iceland, with a score of 0.93. Overall, the Nordic countries make up 3 of the 5 most gender equal countries worldwide. The Nordic countries are known for their high levels of gender equality, including high female employment rates and evenly divided parental leave. Sudan is the second-least gender equal country Pakistan is found on the other end of the scale, ranked as the least gender equal country in the world. Conditions for civilians in the North African country have worsened significantly after a civil war broke out in April 2023. Especially girls and women are suffering and have become victims of sexual violence. Moreover, nearly 9 million people are estimated to be at acute risk of famine. The Middle East and North Africa have the largest gender gap Looking at the different world regions, the Middle East and North Africa have the largest gender gap as of 2023, just ahead of South Asia. Moreover, it is estimated that it will take another 152 years before the gender gap in the Middle East and North Africa is closed. On the other hand, Europe has the lowest gender gap in the world.

In 2025, Luxembourg was the country with the highest gross domestic product per capita in the world. Of the 20 listed countries, 13 are in Europe and five are in Asia, alongside the U.S. and Australia. There are no African or Latin American countries among the top 20. Correlation with high living standards While GDP is a useful indicator for measuring the size or strength of an economy, GDP per capita is much more reflective of living standards. For example, when compared to life expectancy or indices such as the Human Development Index or the World Happiness Report, there is a strong overlap - 14 of the 20 countries on this list are also ranked among the 20 happiest countries in 2024, and all 20 have "very high" HDIs. Misleading metrics? GDP per capita figures, however, can be misleading, and to paint a fuller picture of a country's living standards then one must look at multiple metrics. GDP per capita figures can be skewed by inequalities in wealth distribution, and in countries such as those in the Middle East, a relatively large share of the population lives in poverty while a smaller number live affluent lifestyles.

This statistic describes the ranking on the Social Progress Index of countries in the Middle East and North Africa in 2016, by country. During this time period, Yemen ranked *** out of 130 countries on the Social Progress Index, making it the the lowest ranked country in the MENA region.

Group II Base Oil Market Outlook

The global Group II Base Oil market size was valued at approximately USD 5.8 billion in 2023 and is projected to reach around USD 8.9 billion by 2032, exhibiting a CAGR of 4.8% during the forecast period from 2024 to 2032. A significant growth factor driving the global market is the escalating demand for high-performance lubricants that comply with stringent environmental regulations and enhance engine efficiency.

One of the primary growth factors for the Group II Base Oil market is the rapid industrialization and urbanization observed globally. As industries expand and urban centers grow, the demand for industrial machinery, automotive vehicles, and other equipment increases, consequently driving the need for efficient lubricants. Group II Base Oils, known for their high viscosity index and excellent oxidative stability, are becoming the lubricants of choice for various applications in automotive and industrial sectors. This trend is particularly prominent in emerging economies where infrastructure development and automotive sales are on the rise.

The shift towards more environmentally friendly and efficient lubricants is another crucial growth driver for the Group II Base Oil market. With governments worldwide implementing stringent regulations on emissions and environmental impact, the need for lubricants that can enhance fuel efficiency and reduce emissions has never been greater. Group II Base Oils, characterized by their low sulfur content and superior performance, are well-suited to meet these regulatory requirements, thereby fueling market growth. Furthermore, the growing consumer awareness about the environmental impact of traditional lubricants is propelling the demand for Group II Base Oils.

Technological advancements in the production of Group II Base Oils are also playing a significant role in market expansion. Innovations in refining processes, such as hydrocracking and catalytic dewaxing, have improved the quality and performance characteristics of Group II Base Oils, making them more competitive with other lubricant base stocks. These technological improvements have not only expanded the application range of Group II Base Oils but have also made them more cost-effective, thus boosting their adoption across various industries.

Regionally, Asia Pacific dominates the Group II Base Oil market and is expected to continue its dominance over the forecast period. Countries like China and India are witnessing rapid industrialization and urbanization, which is significantly boosting the demand for lubricants. Moreover, the expanding automotive industry in these countries is also contributing to the increased consumption of Group II Base Oils. North America and Europe are also significant markets, driven by the stringent environmental regulations and the growing focus on sustainability. The Middle East & Africa and Latin America are emerging markets with substantial growth potential, primarily due to increasing industrial activities and infrastructure development.

Type Analysis

The Group II Base Oil market is segmented by type into Light Grade, Medium Grade, and Heavy Grade. Each of these segments caters to different applications and industries, providing specific benefits that enhance their performance and efficiency. The Light Grade segment is primarily used in applications requiring lower viscosity oils, such as passenger car engine oils and some industrial lubricants. These oils offer excellent performance in terms of fuel efficiency and emission control, making them highly sought after in regions with stringent environmental regulations.

The Medium Grade segment of Group II Base Oils is used in a broader range of applications, including both automotive and industrial lubricants. These oils provide a balanced performance, offering both good viscosity and oxidative stability. They are particularly popular in the heavy-duty automotive sector, where their ability to perform under high-stress conditions is highly valued. The growth of the Medium Grade segment is also driven by the increasing need for high-performance lubricants in industrial machinery, where reliability and efficiency are critical.

Heavy Grade Group II Base Oils are used in applications that require high viscosity oils, such as heavy-duty industrial machinery, marine engines, and off-road equipment. These oils provide excellent protection against wear and tear, making them ideal for use in harsh operating conditions. The demand for Heavy Grade Group II Base Oils is growing, particularly in regions with significant

Abstract

In an environment where the Bank must demonstrate its impact and value, it is critical that the institution collects and tracks empirical data on how its work is perceived by clients, partners and other stakeholders in our client countries.

In FY 2013, the Country Opinion Survey Program was scaled up in order to: - Annually assess perceptions of the World Bank among key stakeholders in a representative sample of client countries; - Track these opinions over time, representative of: regions, stakeholders, country lending levels, country income/size levels, etc. - Inform strategy and decision making: apply findings to challenges to ensure real time response at several levels: corporate, regional, country - Obtain systematic feedback from stakeholders regarding: - The general environment in their country; - Value of the World Bank in their country; - World Bank's presence (work, relationships, etc.); - World Bank's future role in their country. - Create a feedback loop that allows data to be shared with stakeholders.

Geographic coverage

The data from the 41 country surveys were combined in this review. Although individual countries are not specified, each country was designated as part of a particular region: Africa (AFR), East Asia (EAP), Europe/Central Asia (ECA), Latin America (LAC), Middle East/North Africa (MNA), and South Asia (SAR).

Analysis unit

Client Country

Kind of data

Sample survey data [ssd]

Sampling procedure

In FY 2013 (July 2012 to July 1, 2013), 26,014 stakeholders of the World Bank in 41 different countries were invited to provide their opinions on the Bank's assistance to the country by participating in a country survey. Participants in these surveys were drawn from among senior government officials (from the office of the Prime Minister, President, Minister, Parliamentarian; i.e., elected officials), staff of ministries (employees of ministries, ministerial departments, or implementation agencies, and government officials; i.e., non-elected government officials, and those attached to agencies implementing Bank-supported projects), consultants/contractors working on World Bank-supported projects/programs; project management units (PMUs) overseeing implementation of a project; local government officials or staff, bilateral and multilateral agency staff, private sector organizations, private foundations; the financial sector/private banks; non-government organizations (NGOs, including CBOs), the media, independent government institutions (e.g., regulatory agencies, central banks), trade unions, faith-based groups, members of academia or research institutes, and members of the judiciary.

Mode of data collection

Mail Questionnaire [mail]

Research instrument

The Questionnaire consists of the following sections:

A. General Issues facing a country: Respondents were asked to indicate whether the country is headed in the right direction, what they thought were the top three most important development priorities, and which areas would contribute most to reducing poverty and generating economic growth in the country.

B. Overall Attitudes toward the World Bank: Respondents were asked to rate their familiarity with the World Bank, the Bank's effectiveness in the country, the extent to which the Bank meets the country's needs for knowledge services and financial instruments, and the extent to which the Bank should seek or does seek to influence the global development agenda. Respondents were also asked to rate their agreement with various statements regarding the Bank's work and the extent to which the Bank is an effective development partner. Furthermore, respondents were asked to indicate the sectoral areas on which it would be most productive for the Bank to focus its resources, the Bank's greatest values and greatest weaknesses in its work, the most and least effective instruments in helping to reduce poverty in the country, with which groups the Bank should collaborate more, and to what reasons respondents attributed failed or slow reform efforts.

C. World Bank Effectiveness and Results: Respondents were asked to rate the extent to which the Bank's work helps achieve sustainable development results in the country, and the Bank's level of effectiveness across thirty-five development areas, such as economic growth, public sector governance, basic infrastructure, social protection, and others.

D. The World Bank's Knowledge: Respondents were asked to indicate the areas on which the Bank should focus its research efforts, and to rate the effectiveness and quality of the Bank's knowledge/research, including how significant of a contribution it makes to development results, its technical quality, and the Bank's effectiveness at providing linkage to non-Bank expertise.

E. Working with the World Bank: Respondents were asked to rate their level of agreement with a series of statements regarding working with the Bank, such as the World Bank's "Safeguard Policy" requirements being reasonable, the Bank imposing reasonable conditions on its lending, disbursing funds promptly, and increasing the country's institutional capacity.

F. The Future Role of the World Bank in the country: Respondents were asked to rate how significant a role the Bank should play in the country's development in the near future, and to indicate what the Bank should do to make itself of greater value in the country.

G. Communication and Information Sharing: Respondents were asked to indicate where they get information about economic and social development issues, how they prefer to receive information from the Bank, their access to the Internet, and their usage and evaluation of the Bank's websites. Respondents were asked about their awareness of the Bank's Access to Information policy, past information requests from the Bank, and their level of agreement that they use more data from the World Bank as a result of the Bank's Open Data policy. Respondents were also asked to indicate their level of agreement that they know how to find information from the Bank and that the Bank is responsive to information requests.

H. Background Information: Respondents were asked to indicate their current position, specialization, whether they professionally collaborate with the World Bank, their exposure to the Bank in the country, and their geographic location.

Response rate

A total of 9,279 stakeholders (36% response rate) participated and are part of this review.