This dataset presents the percentage of the 15-64 year old population within each Socio-Economic Indexes for Individuals (SEIFI) Index of Relative Socio-economic Disadvantage (IRSD) group. The data has been aggregated to the 2006 Census Collection Districts (CD). This datasets presents the IRSD groups to 10 categories, where group 1 is the 10% most disadvantaged 15-64 year old population and group 10 presents the most advantaged 10% of 15-64 year old population. For more information please visit the ACT Government Data Portal. Please note: AURIN has spatially enabled the original data.

This data is SA2 based SEIFA data on The Index of Relative Socio-economic Disadvantage, 2016. Data is based upon 2016 ASGS boundaries. Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas (SEIFA) is an ABS product that ranks areas in Australia according to relative socio-economic advantage and disadvantage. The indexes are based on information from the five-yearly Census of Population and Housing. SEIFA 2016 has been created from Census 2016 data and consists of four indexes: The Index of Relative Socio-economic Disadvantage (IRSD); The Index of Relative Socio-economic Advantage and Disadvantage (IRSAD); The Index of Education and Occupation (IEO); The Index of Economic Resources (IER). Each index is a summary of a different subset of Census variables and focuses on a different aspect of socio-economic advantage and disadvantage. This data is ABS data (catalogue number: 2033.0.55.001) used with permission from the Australian Bureau of Statistics. For more information on this data please visit the Australian Bureau of Statistics.

This data is Census Collection Districts (CD) based Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas (SEIFA) Index of Advantage/Disadvantage (IRSAD) - Is a continuum of advantage to disadvantage. Low values indicate areas of disadvantage; and high values indicate areas of advantage. This data is based on the 2006 census and follows the 2006 Australian Standard Geographical Classification (ASGC) boundaries. The Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) has developed indexes to allow ranking of regions/areas, providing a method of determining the level of social and economic wellbeing in that region. There are four indexes included in the SEIFA 2006 product. They relate to socio-economic aspects of geographic areas. Each index summarises a different aspect of the socio-economic conditions in an area. The indexes have been obtained by a technique called principal components analysis. This technique summarises the information from a variety of social and economic variables, calculating weights that will give the best summary for the underlying variables. For the SEIFA indexes, each index uses a different set of underlying variables. All the indexes (including the Index of Relative Socio-Economic Disadvantage) have been constructed so that relatively disadvantaged areas (e.g. areas with many low income earners) have low index values. This data is ABS data (catalogue number: 2033.0.55.001) used with permission from the Australian Bureau of Statistics. For more information on this data please visit the Australian Bureau of Statistics.Please note: AURIN has spatially enabled the original data following the 2006 ASGC.

The Index of Household Advantage and Disadvantage (IHAD) provides a summary measure of relative socio-economic advantage and disadvantage for households, based on the characteristics of dwellings and the people living within them, using 2021 Census data.

All in-scope households are ordered from lowest to highest score. A low score indicates relatively greater disadvantage and a lack of advantage in general. A high score indicates a relative lack of disadvantage and greater advantage in general.

This dataset presents IHAD data in quartiles. The lowest 25% of households are given a quartile number of 1, the next lowest 25% of households are given a quartile number of 2 and so on, up to the highest 25% of households which are given a quartile number of 4. This means that households are divided into four equal sized groups, depending on their score. In practice these groups won’t each be exactly 25% of households as it depends on the distribution of the IHAD scores. The data is grouped by State and Territory (2021). State and Territory boundaries are defined by the Australian Statistical Geography Standard (ASGS) Edition 3.

Key Attributes:

      Field alias
      Field name
      Description


      State and Territory 2021 code
      STATE_CODE_2021
      2021 State and Territory codes from the Australian Statistical Geography Standard (ASGS), Edition 3. The ASGS State and Territory boundaries are a cartographic representation of legally designated boundaries and therefore should not be used for legal purposes. States and Territories consist of one or more Statistical Areas Level 4. In aggregate, they cover Australia without gaps or overlaps.


      State and Territory 2021 name
      STATE_NAME_2021
      2021 State and Territory names from the Australian Statistical Geography Standard (ASGS), Edition 3. The ASGS State and Territory boundaries are a cartographic representation of legally designated boundaries and therefore should not be used for legal purposes. States and Territories consist of one or more Statistical Areas Level 4. In aggregate, they cover Australia without gaps or overlaps.


      Area in square kilometres
      AREA_ALBERS_SQKM
      The area of a region in square kilometres, based on the Albers equal area conic projection.


      IHAD quartile 1
      IHAD_QUARTILE1
      Proportion of in-scope dwellings in the State or Territory that fall into IHAD quartile 1, indicating relatively greater disadvantage and lack of advantage in general.


      IHAD quartile 2
      IHAD_QUARTILE2
      Proportion of in-scope dwellings in the State or Territory that fall into IHAD quartile 2.


      IHAD quartile 3
      IHAD_QUARTILE3
      Proportion of in-scope dwellings in the State or Territory that fall into IHAD quartile 3.


      IHAD quartile 4
      IHAD_QUARTILE4
      Proportion of in-scope dwellings in the State or Territory that fall into IHAD quartile 4, indicating a relative lack of disadvantage and greater advantage in general.


      Occupied private dwellings
      OPD_2021
      Dwellings in-scope of the IHAD i.e. classifiable occupied private dwellings.


      SEIFA IRSAD quartile
      IRSAD_QUARTILE
      Index of Relative Socio-economic Advantage and Disadvantage quartile. All States are ordered from lowest to highest score, the lowest 25% of States are given a quartile number of 1, the next lowest 25% of States are given a quartile number of 2 and so on, up to the highest 25% of States which are given a quartile number of 4. This means that States are divided into four equal sized groups, depending on their score. In practice these groups won’t each be exactly 25% of States as it depends on the distribution of SEIFA scores.


      Usual resident population
      URP_2021
      Population counts in this column are based on place of usual residence as reported on Census Night. These include persons out of scope of the IHAD.


      Dwellings
      DWELLING
      Total dwellings at Census time, including dwellings out of scope of the IHAD e.g. unoccupied private dwellings.

Data and geography references

Source data publication: Index of Household Advantage and Disadvantage Geographic boundary information: Australian Statistical Geography Standard (ASGS) Edition 3 Further information: Index of Household Advantage and Disadvantage methodology Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS)

Contact the Australian Bureau of Statistics

Email geography@abs.gov.au if you have any questions or feedback about this web service.
Subscribe to get updates on ABS web services and geospatial products.

Privacy at the Australian Bureau of Statistics Read how the ABS manages personal information - ABS privacy policy.

Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas (SEIFA) is a product developed by the ABS that ranks areas in Australia according to relative socio-economic advantage and disadvantage. The indexes are based on information from the five-yearly Census. SEIFA 2011 is the latest version of this product and consists of four indexes. The Index of Economic Resources (IER) focuses on the financial aspects of relative socio-economic advantage and disadvantage, by summarising variables related to income and wealth. This index excludes education and occupation variables because they are not direct measures of economic resources. It also misses some assets such as savings or equities which, although relevant, could not be included because this information was not collected in the 2011 Census. Data last updated: 28th March 2013. Users of this data are advised to carefully read the accompanying information on the SEIFA web page and in the Technical Paper. SEIFA Homepage SEIFA Technical Paper For further information about these and related statistics, contact the National Information and Referral Services on 1300 135 070. Periodicity: 5-Yearly.

The Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas (SEIFA) rank areas according to their relative socio-economic advantage and disadvantage using 2021 Census data. This layer presents data by Local Government Areas (LGA), 2021. SEIFA 2021 consists of four indexes: The Index of Relative Socio-economic Advantage and Disadvantage (IRSAD) The Index of Relative Socio-economic Disadvantage (IRSD) The Index of Education and Occupation (IEO) The Index of Economic Resources (IER) Each index summarises different subsets of 2021 Census variables and focuses on a different aspect of socio-economic advantage and disadvantage.For detailed information on how to use the SEIFA data, please refer to the SEIFA 2021 Technical Paper.

Made possible by the Digital Atlas of Australia The Digital Atlas of Australia is an Australian Government initiative being led by Geoscience Australia. It will bring together trusted datasets from across government in an interactive, secure, and easy-to-use geospatial platform. The Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) is working in partnership with Geoscience Australia to establish a set of web services to make ABS data available in the Digital Atlas.

Contact the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) If you have questions, feedback or would like to receive updates about this web service, please email geography@abs.gov.au. For information about how the ABS manages any personal information you provide view the ABS privacy policy.

Data and geography references Source data publication: Census of Population and Housing: Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas (SEIFA), Australia Geographic boundary information: Australian Statistical Geography Standard (ASGS) Edition 3 Further information: Census of Population and Housing: Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas (SEIFA), Australia, Data downloads Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS)

Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas (SEIFA) is a product developed by the ABS that ranks areas in Australia according to relative socio-economic advantage and disadvantage. The indexes are based on information from the five-yearly Census. SEIFA 2011 is the latest version of this product and consists of four indexes: The Index of Relative Socio-economic Disadvantage (IRSD); The Index of Relative Socio-economic Advantage and Disadvantage (IRSAD); The Index of Education and Occupation (IEO); The Index of Economic Resources (IER). Each index is a summary of a different subset of Census variables and focuses on a different aspect of socio-economic advantage and disadvantage.

Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas (SEIFA) is a product developed by the ABS that ranks areas in Australia according to relative socio-economic advantage and disadvantage. The indexes are based on information from the five-yearly Census. SEIFA 2011 is the latest version of this product and consists of four indexes. The Index of Economic Resources (IER) focuses on the financial aspects of relative socio-economic advantage and disadvantage, by summarising variables related to income and wealth. This index excludes education and occupation variables because they are not direct measures of economic resources. It also misses some assets such as savings or equities which, although relevant, could not be included because this information was not collected in the 2011 Census. Data last updated: 28th March 2013. Users of this data are advised to carefully read the accompanying information on the SEIFA web page and in the Technical Paper. SEIFA Homepage SEIFA Technical Paper For further information about these and related statistics, contact the National Information and Referral Services on 1300 135 070. Periodicity: 5-Yearly.

This spread sheet shows ABS geographic standards from 2006 across Australia and the % of the 15-64 year old population within each Socio-Economic Indexes for Individuals (SEIFI) IRSAD group. The data used to create this information was the same as used in the research paper “Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas: Getting a handle on individual diversity within areas” by Phillip Wise and Rosalynn Mathews. It is advised that this paper is read to further develop an understanding of the concepts and caveats associated with the analytical output contained in the spreadsheet.] Roughly, the most disadvantaged 10% of the 15–64 year old population falls into group 1, whilst group 10 contains the most advantaged 10%. The smallest group in terms of 15–64 year old population proportion is group 6 with 7.78%, compared to group 7 with the largest percentage at 12% due to clustering at this point in the distribution of scores. Group 1 – Approx. 9.6% of the 15-64 year old population Group 2 – Approx. 10.0% of the 15-64 year old population Group 3 – Approx. 11.5% of the 15-64 year old population Group 4 – Approx. 8.6% of the 15-64 year old population Group 5 – Approx. 11.4% of the 15-64 year old population Group 6 – Approx. 7.8% of the 15-64 year old population Group 7 – Approx. 12.0% of the 15-64 year old population Group 8 – Approx. 9.1% of the 15-64 year old population Group 9 – Approx. 9.5% of the 15-64 year old population Group 10 – Approx. 10.5% of the 15-64 year old population

Index of Relative Socio-economic Advantage and Disadvantage (IRSAD)The Index of Relative Socio-economic Advantage and Disadvantage (IRSAD) summarises information about the economic and social conditions of people and households within an area. This index includes both relative advantage and disadvantage measures.A low score indicates relatively greater disadvantage and a lack of advantage in general. For example, an area could have a low score if there are: many households with low incomes, or many people in unskilled occupations, AND a few households with high incomes, or few people in skilled occupations.A high score indicates a relative lack of disadvantage and greater advantage in general. For example, an area may have a high score if there are: many households with high incomes, or many people in skilled occupations, AND few households with low incomes, or few people in unskilled occupations.IRSAD can be used:as a general measure of advantage and disadvantageto understand disadvantage, and advantageto offset advantage or disadvantage in their analysis.For example, IRSAD may be applicable when the topic being analysed is likely to be affected by both advantage and disadvantage.IRSAD is not recommended for:investigating disadvantage onlycomparing with data that is already included in IRSAD, such as areas with a high proportion of dwellings paying high levels of rent.Index of Relative Socio-economic Disadvantage (IRSD)The Index of Relative Socio-economic Disadvantage (IRSD) is a general socio-economic index that summarises a range of information about the economic and social conditions of people and households within an area. IRSD only includes measures of relative disadvantage.A low score indicates relatively greater disadvantage. For example, an area could have a low score if there are: many households with low income, or many people without qualifications, and many people in low skilled occupations.A high score indicates a relative lack of disadvantage. For example, an area may have a high score if there are: few households with low incomes, few people without qualifications, few people in low skilled occupations.IRSD can be used:to understand an area's relative disadvantage and lack of disadvantageas a broad measure of disadvantage.For example, IRSD may be applicable when a user wants to allocate funds to disadvantaged areas.IRSD is not recommended for:investigating both advantage and disadvantagecomparing with data that is already included in IRSD, such as areas with a high proportion of households with low incomes.Index of Education and Occupation (IEO)The Index of Education and Occupation (IEO) reflects the educational and occupational level of communities. The education variables reflect educational attainment or if further education is being undertaken. The occupation variables are based on the Australian and New Zealand Standard Classification of Occupations (ANZSCO). It classifies the workforce into groups of occupations, skill levels and employment status. Unlike the other indexes IEO does not include any income variables.A low IEO score indicates relatively lower education and occupation levels of people in the area. For example, an area could have a low score if there are: many people without qualifications, or many people in low skilled occupations, or many people unemployed, AND few people with a high level of qualifications or in highly skilled occupations.A high score indicates relatively higher education and occupation status of people in the area in general. For example, an area could have a high score if there are: many people with higher education qualifications or many people in highly skilled occupations, AND few people without qualifications or few people in low skilled occupations.IEO can be used:to understand education and occupation variablesto understand the relationship between income, education, and employment. IEO is not recommended:for investigating disadvantage onlyas a broader measure of advantage and disadvantagefor comparing with data that is already included in IEO, such as unemployment.Index of Economic Resources (IER)The Index of Economic Resources (IER) focuses on the financial aspects of relative socio-economic advantage and disadvantage, by summarising variables related to income and housing. IER excludes education and occupation variables as they are not direct measures of economic resources. It also excludes assets such as savings or equities which, although relevant, cannot be included as they are not collected in the Census.A low score indicates a relative lack of access to economic resources. For example, an area may have a low score if there are: many households with low incomes, or many households paying low rent, AND few households with high income, or few people who own their home.A high score indicates relatively greater access to economic resources. For example, an area may have a high score if there are: many households with high income, or many people who own their home, AND few low-income households, or few households paying low rent.IER is recommended for understanding an area's access to economic resources (e.g. understanding housing as well as income).IER is not recommended:for investigating disadvantage only as this index measures both advantage and disadvantageas a general measure of advantage and disadvantagefor comparing with data that is already included in IER, such as household income.For more information, please visit: Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas (SEIFA), Australia, 2021 | Australian Bureau of Statistics

This data is SA1 based SEIFA data on The Index of Education and Occupation, 2016. Data is based upon 2016 ASGS boundaries. Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas (SEIFA) is an ABS product that ranks areas in Australia according to relative socio-economic advantage and disadvantage. The indexes are based on information from the five-yearly Census of Population and Housing. SEIFA 2016 has been created from Census 2016 data and consists of four indexes: The Index of Relative Socio-economic Disadvantage (IRSD); The Index of Relative Socio-economic Advantage and Disadvantage (IRSAD); The Index of Education and Occupation (IEO); The Index of Economic Resources (IER). Each index is a summary of a different subset of Census variables and focuses on a different aspect of socio-economic advantage and disadvantage. This data is ABS data (catalogue number: 2033.0.55.001) used with permission from the Australian Bureau of Statistics. For more information on this data please visit the Australian Bureau of Statistics.

This data is SA1 based SEIFA data on The Index of Economic Resources, 2016. Data is based upon 2016 ASGS boundaries. Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas (SEIFA) is an ABS product that ranks areas in Australia according to relative socio-economic advantage and disadvantage. The indexes are based on information from the five-yearly Census of Population and Housing. SEIFA 2016 has been created from Census 2016 data and consists of four indexes: The Index of Relative Socio-economic Disadvantage (IRSD); The Index of Relative Socio-economic Advantage and Disadvantage (IRSAD); The Index of Education and Occupation (IEO); The Index of Economic Resources (IER). Each index is a summary of a different subset of Census variables and focuses on a different aspect of socio-economic advantage and disadvantage. This data is ABS data (catalogue number: 2033.0.55.001) used with permission from the Australian Bureau of Statistics. For more information on this data please visit the Australian Bureau of Statistics.

Data source: ABSEPSG: 7855Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas (SEIFA) is an ABS product that ranks areas in Australia according to relative socio-economic advantage and disadvantage. The indexes are based on information from the five-yearly Census of Population and Housing.SEIFA 2016 has been created from Census 2016 data and consists of four indexes: The Index of Relative Socio-economic Disadvantage (IRSD); The Index of Relative Socio-economic Advantage and Disadvantage (IRSAD); The Index of Education and Occupation (IEO); The Index of Economic Resources (IER).Each index is a summary of a different subset of Census variables and focuses on a different aspect of socio-economic advantage and disadvantage.SEIFA indexes1.Index of Relative Socio-economic Advantage / Disadvantage (IRSAD)A composite index where lower scores indicate more disadvantaged areas and higher scores indicate more advantaged areas.This index is constructed using a number of different variables that indicate both advantage (e.g., high income, having a degree qualification) and disadvantage (e.g., unemployment status, low income, number of bedrooms)2.Index of Relative Socio-economic Disadvantage (IRSD)Identifies areas with lower educational attainment, people in low-skilled occupations, low employment and other indicators of disadvantage.This index ranks areas from most disadvantaged to least disadvantaged3.Index of Economic Resources (IER)Includes variables such as rent paid, household income and mortgage payments4.Index of Education and Occupation (IEO)Includes education and occupation variablesSource: SEIFA

The Census 2021 Relative Socio-Economic Index for SA2 data.Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas (SEIFA) in Australia are comprehensive measures that provide insights into the well-being of communities across the country. Developed by the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS), SEIFA indices compile census data to evaluate various socio-economic factors, including income, education, employment, and housing conditions. These indices rank areas in Australia according to their relative socio-economic advantage and disadvantage, offering a detailed snapshot that helps identify the varying levels of social and economic well-being in different regions. This crucial data assists government bodies, policymakers, and community organisations in understanding disparities across different areas, enabling them to tailor services, allocate funding, and develop initiatives that address specific community needs, ultimately aiming to enhance the quality of life and reduce inequalities across different Australian locales.

For further details on how ABS curates these indices please visit: Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas (SEIFA): Technical Paper, 2021 | Australian Bureau of Statistics (abs.gov.au)

Index of Relative Socio-economic Advantage and Disadvantage as determined by Australian Bureau of Statistics http://stat.data.abs.gov.au/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=ABS_SEIFA_LGA#

Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas (SEIFA) is a product developed by the ABS that ranks areas in Australia according to relative socio-economic advantage and disadvantage. The indexes are based on information from the five-yearly Census. SEIFA 2011 is the latest version of this product and consists of four indexes. The Index of Education and Occupation (IEO) is designed to reflect the educational and occupational level of communities. The education variables in this index show either the level of qualification achieved or whether further education is being undertaken. The occupation variables classify the workforce into the major groups and skill levels of the Australian and New Zealand Standard Classification of Occupations (ANZSCO) and the unemployed. This index does not include any income variables. Data last updated: 28th March 2013. Users of this data are advised to carefully read the accompanying information on the SEIFA web page and in the Technical Paper. SEIFA Homepage SEIFA Technical Paper For further information about these and related statistics, contact the National Information and Referral Services on 1300 135 070. Periodicity: 5-Yearly.

This data is Census Collection Districts (CD) based Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas (SEIFA) data based on the 1996 census. The data follows the 1996 Australian Standard Geographical Classification (ASGC) boundaries. The Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) has developed five indexes to allow ranking of regions/areas, providing a method of determining the level of social and economic wellbeing in that region. The five indexes are: Urban Index of Relative Socio-Economic Advantage Rural Index of Relative Socio-Economic Advantage Index of Relative Socio-Economic Disadvantage Index of Economic Resources Index of Education and Occupation These indexes show where the affluent (as opposed to just high income earning) live; where disadvantaged (as opposed to the unemployed) live: and where the highly skilled and educated (as opposed to the tertiary educated people) live.SEIFA 1996 provides information and rankings for a wide range of geographic areas. This data is ABS data (catalogue number: 2033.0.55.001) used with permission from the Australian Bureau of Statistics. For more information on this data please visit the Australian Bureau of Statistics.Please note: AURIN has spatially enabled the original data following the 1996 ASGC.

This data is Statistical Local Areas (SLA) based Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas (SEIFA) data based on the 2001 census. The data follows the 2001 Australian Standard Geographical Classification (ASGC) boundaries. The Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) has developed indexes to allow ranking of regions/areas, providing a method of determining the level of social and economic wellbeing in that region. There are four indexes included in the SEIFA 2001 product. Each index summarises a different aspect of the socio-economic conditions in an area. The indexes have been obtained by a technique called principal components analysis. This technique summarises the information from a variety of social and economic variables, calculating weights that will give the best summary for the underlying variables. For the SEIFA indexes, each index uses a different set of underlying variables. The four indexes are: Index of Disadvantage (IRSD) - focuses on low-income earners, relatively lower educational attainment, high unemployment and variables reflecting disadvantage. Index of Advantage/Disadvantage (IRSAD) - A new index, and is a continuum of advantage to disadvantage. Low values indicate areas of disadvantage; and high values indicate areas of advantage. Index of Economic Resources (IER) - This index includes variables that are associated with economic resources. Variables include rent paid, income by family type, mortgage payments, and rental properties. Index of Education and Occupation (IEO) - This index includes all education and occupation variables only. All the indexes (including the Index of Relative Socio-Economic Disadvantage) have been constructed so that relatively disadvantaged areas (e.g. areas with many low income earners) have low index values. This data is ABS data (catalogue number: 2033.0.55.001) used with permission from the Australian Bureau of Statistics. For more information on this data please visit the Australian Bureau of Statistics.Please note:

AURIN has spatially enabled the original data following the 2001 ASGC.

The relative change in proportion of deficit for three categories of healthcare professions, between the years 2013 and 2021 across 368 rural and remote Australian local government areas, by remoteness area and index of relative socioeconomic advantage and disadvantage (IRSAD).

This data is Census Collection Districts (CD) based Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas (SEIFA) data based on the 1991 census. The data follows the 1991 Australian Standard Geographical Classification …Show full descriptionThis data is Census Collection Districts (CD) based Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas (SEIFA) data based on the 1991 census. The data follows the 1991 Australian Standard Geographical Classification (ASGC) boundaries. The Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) has developed five indexes to allow ranking of regions/areas, providing a method of determining the level of social and economic wellbeing in that region. The five indexes are: Urban Index of Relative Socio-Economic Advantage Rural Index of Relative Socio-Economic Advantage Index of Relative Socio-Economic Disadvantage Index of Economic Resources Index of Education and Occupation These indexes show where the affluent (as opposed to just high income earning) live; where disadvantaged (as opposed to the unemployed) live: and where the highly skilled and educated (as opposed to the tertiary educated people) live. SEIFA 1991 provides information and rankings for a wide range of geographic areas. This data is ABS data (catalogue number: 2033.0.55.001) used with permission from the Australian Bureau of Statistics. For more information on this data please visit the Australian Bureau of Statistics. Please note: AURIN has spatially enabled the original data following the 1991 ASGC. Copyright attribution: Government of the Commonwealth of Australia - Australian Bureau of Statistics, (2006): ; accessed from AURIN on 12/16/2021. Licence type: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)