India: Innovations index (0-100): The latest value from 2025 is 38.2 points, a decline from 38.3 points in 2024. In comparison, the world average is 31.49 points, based on data from 139 countries. Historically, the average for India from 2011 to 2025 is 35.73 points. The minimum value, 31.7 points, was reached in 2015 while the maximum of 38.3 points was recorded in 2024.

In 2022, India climbed to the **** position in the Global Innovation Index (GII), showing an improvement from its previous rank of **. The GII is an annual report that evaluates and assesses the innovation performance of countries worldwide, providing a comprehensive understanding of their innovation capabilities.

In 2021, the union territory of Chandigarh, achieved a score of ***** on the Indian Innovation Index, securing the top position. Delhi and Manipur followed closely, with scores of ** and ***** respectively, on the index.

India's Global Innovation Index data - score and ranking across all sub-indexes, in addition to comparison with global peers.

In 2020, the National Capital Region of Delhi (NCR) topped the state innovation index ranking in India with a score of ****. The union territory of Puducherry scored ***** points in **** rank. The innovation index consists of several indicators in categories like human capital, investment, or knowledge. Most of the states and union territories of India performed very well in 2020 and received more points compared to 2019.

Manipur emerged as the leading performer among all the northeastern (NER) and hill states of India in the Innovation Index 2021, with a score of *****. High research and development (R&D) expenditure as a share of Gross State Domestic Product (GSDP) and increasing concentration of ICT labs in schools were propelling factors. Manipur was followed by the states of Uttarakhand and Meghalaya. As per the 2011 census, about *** percent of India's population resides in NER.

The Global Innovation Index (GII) ranking of 2023 includes 21 countries of the Asia Pacific region. Singapore champions the Asia Pacific region with a GII score of 61.5 followed closely by South Korea with a GII score of 58.6.

Goal 9: Build resilient infrastructure, promote inclusive and sustainable industrialization and foster innovationAbout 2.6 billion people in the developing world are facing difficulties in accessing electricity full time.2.5 billion people worldwide lack access to basic sanitation and almost 800 million people lack access to water, many hundreds of millions of them in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia.1 to 1.5 million people do not have access to reliable phone service.For many African countries, particularly the lower-income countries, infrastructure constraints affect company productivity by around 40%.Manufacturing is an important employer, accounting for around 470 million jobs worldwide in 2009 – or around 16% of the world’s workforce of 2.9 billion. It is estimated that there were more than half a billion jobs in manufacturing in 2013.Industrialization’s job multiplication effect has a positive impact on society. Every one job in manufacturing creates 2.2 jobs in other sectors.In developing countries, barely 30% of agricultural production undergoes industrial processing. In high-income countries, 98% is processed. This suggests that there are great opportunities for developing countries in agribusiness.India’s growth rate averaged at 7.25% in the last 5 years.India’s CO2 emissions per capita are 1.67 (metric tons), one of the lowest in the world, the global average being around 4-5(metric tons). In 2010, per capita annual electricity consumption was 626 kwH compared to the global average of 2977 kwH.This map layer is offered by Esri India, for ArcGIS Online subscribers, If you have any questions or comments, please let us know via content@esri.in.

As of 2021, the Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) index score for industry, innovation, and infrastructure (SDG 9) ranges between ** and ** for Indian states and union territories. The state of Gujarat had the highest score of **.

During the financial year 2021, government spending on the construction of railway projects in the northeastern region of India fell to around ** billion Indian rupees from around ** billion Indian rupees in the previous financial year.

Abstract

Malaria is a serious health threat to the Indian population. The World Bank, through the National Vector Borne Disease Control Program, is assisting the government of India to develop a new national response strategy.

This impact evaluation study was undertaken to test the effectiveness of the new strategies of malaria control in India. These strategies included community-based management of fever and malaria with rapid diagnostic tests and artemisinin-combination therapy, and introduction of long lasting insecticidal treated bed nets. The impact evaluation was conducted in 120 villages in two high endemic districts in Orissa state. It was a three-arm randomized design with one intervention arm receiving supportive supervision of community health workers along with community mobilization, the second intervention arm with only community mobilization, and a third control arm without any intervention.

The baseline data collection was carried out in Dec. 2008 - Jan. 2009, and the endline data collection - in Nov. 2010 - Feb. 2011. Data from endline household questionnaires, the malaria service providers questionnaire and the community questionnaire is documented here.

Geographic coverage

Sundargarh and Mayurbhanj districts in Orissa State

Analysis unit

• households (all family members living together with a common kitchen are defined as a household);
• village-level malaria service providers;
• community leaders and activists.

Kind of data

Sample survey data [ssd]

Sampling procedure

The following information is taken from "Impact Evaluation under India’s National Vector Borne Disease Control Program Summary Note", available in Technical Documents.

"The interventions involving the contracting of local NGOs will be implemented in two districts purposively sampled from the 50 PF endemic districts selected in the first year of the National Vector-Borne Disease Control Program. The two selected districts are Sundargarh and Mayurbhanj in Orissa State. In each of the two districts, the intervention will be implemented in a random selection of villages from two administrative blocks each.

Five to six of the villages in each study block will receive one of the two interventions and six observed control villages will receive the standard government program. This creates a study area of roughly 32 villages in the case management treatment arm, 32 in the prevention treatment arm, and 32 control villages in 6 endemic blocks in the three districts.

In each study village, 20 households will be interviewed and, after a village listing of all recent fever cases (fever within the last 2 weeks), up to 20 recent fever cases (from a second household sample) will also be interviewed. An additional, second, control group from blocks not involved in the study will also be interviewed in order to identify whether any local spill-overs or other externalities from treatment activities affect the outcomes of control villages in the same block as the intervention. This second control group will derive from randomly selected additional endemic blocks in the same districts but not participating in the study and will constitute another 48 villages in total.

These power calculations focus on two main outcomes of interest: the percentage of households correctly utilizing at least one long-lasting insecticidal net (LLIN) - for the prevention intervention - and the percentage of fever cases tested for Pf malaria within 24 hours - for the treatment intervention."

Mode of data collection

Face-to-face [f2f]

Research instrument

Questionnaires were administered to households, village-level malaria service providers, and community leaders.

On the household level, the questions were asked about: - demographic characteristics of household members; - use of mosquito nets/indoor residual spraying; - socio-economic status (caste, religion, perceived wealth, housing conditions, cattle, non-farm microenterprise, farm enterprise, land ownership, crops that the household produced, assets); - malaria (knowledge about malaria, Rapid Diagnostic Test (RDK), blood test, malaria treatment, malaria prevention during pregnancy, visits to doctors and ASHA, fever, symptoms of illness, preference of service providers, treatment expenses, use of medicine); - savings, credits and loans; - height and weight of children under 5 years old, and women 15 to 49 years old; - hemoglobin level test, RDT, fever measurement for children under 5, and women 15 to 49 years old.

On malaria service providers level, the questions were asked about: - background and training; - Malaria Rapid Diagnostic Test (RDT) and Artemisinin-based Combination Therapy (ACT) usage; - services provided (blood tests, treatment, educating people about how to prevent malaria, impregnating/distribution of bed nets, helping with insecticide spray); - malaria-related knowledge, attitude and practices; - maintenance of records; - community involvement in malaria treatment and prevention, use of mosquito nets; - work load, incentives, and supervision.

To community leaders and activists, the questions were asked about: - community characteristics (roads, body of water, public transportation, flooding); - active committees and groups; - temporary migration of workers to and from the community.

Indien hat im Global Innovation Index 2025 einen Indexwert von rund 38,2 Punkten und somit Platz 38 von 139 untersuchten Staaten weltweit erreicht. Diese Statistik zeigt die Bewertung Indiens nach dem Global Innovation Index im Zeitraum 2013 bis 2025. Der Global Innovation Index 2025 untersucht 139 Ökonomien weltweit hinsichtlich ihrer Innovationskraft. Dabei wird anhand von 80 ausgewählten Kriterien ein breites Spektrum unterschiedlicher Themenbereiche in den betreffenden Ländern untersucht, um anhand der Ergebnisse ein Ranking erstellen zu können.

During the financial year 2022, the GDP of the Indian state of Assam grew to **** billion U.S. dollars from ***** billion U.S. dollars in the previous financial year. The state is the largest in India's northeastern region both in terms of geography and size of the economy.

In 2023, Singapore ranked first with a health index score of ****, followed by Japan and South Korea. The health index measures the extent to which people are healthy and have access to the necessary services to maintain good health, including health outcomes, health systems, illness and risk factors, and mortality rates. The statistic shows the health and health systems ranking of countries worldwide in 2023, by their health index score.

The United States is the leading country worldwide in terms of spending on research and development (R&D), with R&D expenditure exceeding *** billion purchasing power parity (PPP) U.S. dollars. China is invested about *** billion U.S. dollars into R&D. Health and technology Overall, health and technology dominate R&D spending globally. In 2022, health constituted nearly ** percent of all R&D spending, while hardware producers accounted for over ***percent and software producers accounted for over ***percent. Tech companies such as Meta, Amazon, and Alphabet contribute massively to tech spending, while spending continues to grow in areas such as medical technology and pharmaceuticals. Other sources of R&D spending Other sources of R&D spending include the automotive industry, chemicals, and manufacturing. Notably, within the automotive industry, the EU leads in spending, contributing nearly ** billion euros to the *** billion euros spent on automotive R&D globally. By company, Volkswagen spent the most at **** billion U.S. dollars, while in the United States, Ford spent the most on R&D at *** billion U.S. dollars.