In financial year 2023, Uttar Pradesh, India's most populated state had over ** percent people living under the poverty line of **** U.S. dollars per day. A decade ago the state had over ** percent of its population living under the threshold. The state of Bihar also witnessed a significant reduction in poverty rates from over ** percent in the financial year 2012 to over ** percent in the financial year 2023.

As of 2022, over ********** children between the ages of 10 to 14 years were affected by poverty. In general, age groups from 0 to 19 years were most impacted by extreme poverty.

The dataset contains All India Yearly Number and Percentage of Population Below Poverty Line from Handbook of Statistics on Indian Economy.

India: Poverty ratio, percent living on less than 5.50 USD a day: The latest value from 2021 is 81.8 percent, a decline from 83 percent in 2020. In comparison, the world average is 25.11 percent, based on data from 71 countries. Historically, the average for India from 1977 to 2021 is 89.86 percent. The minimum value, 80.7 percent, was reached in 2019 while the maximum of 97.8 percent was recorded in 1977.

As per World Bank's thresholds, in 2022, over 23.9 percent of India's population was living on less than 3 U.S. dollars per day. When the 4.20 U.S. dollars per day threshold is considered, the share increased to over 5.3 percent. The poverty line of 4.20 per day is set by the World Bank to be representative of the definitions of poverty adopted in lower-middle-income countries.

Percent of Population Below the Poverty Level (5-year estimate) in Indian River County, FL was 11.40% in January of 2023, according to the United States Federal Reserve. Historically, Percent of Population Below the Poverty Level (5-year estimate) in Indian River County, FL reached a record high of 15.40 in January of 2014 and a record low of 10.30 in January of 2020. Trading Economics provides the current actual value, an historical data chart and related indicators for Percent of Population Below the Poverty Level (5-year estimate) in Indian River County, FL - last updated from the United States Federal Reserve on September of 2025.

According to UN Women, almost *** in *** employed women over 15 years-old in India had been living below the international poverty line as of December 2020. Meanwhile, approximately ***** percent of male employed population in India were registered below the poverty benchmark.

Of the total number of people living under extreme poverty in India in 2021, approximately ** million were females. Females were more affected by extreme poverty in India as opposed to their male counterparts during the same time period.

Graph and download economic data for Percent of Population Below the Poverty Level (5-year estimate) in Indian River County, FL (S1701ACS012061) from 2012 to 2023 about Indian River County, FL; Sebastian; poverty; FL; percent; 5-year; population; and USA.

Looking back 45 years or so, progress against poverty in India has been highly uneven over time and space. It took 20 years for the national poverty rate to fall below—and stay below—its value in the early 1950s. And trend rates of poverty reduction have differed appreciably between states. This research project aimed to understand what influence economy-wide and sectoral factors have played in the evolution of poverty measures for India since the 1950s, and to draw lessons for the future. This database contains detailed statistics on a wide range of topics in India. The data are presented at the state level and at the all-India level separately. The database uses published information to construct comprehensive series in six subject blocks. Period coverage is roughly from 1950 to 1994. The database contains 30 spreadsheets and 89 text files (ASCII) that are grouped into the six subject blocks. The formats and sizes of the 30 spreadsheets vary considerably. The list of variables included: . Expenditures (distribution) . National Accounts . Prices Wages . Population . Rainfall

India Proportion of Population Pushed Below the 60% Median Consumption Poverty Line By Out-of-Pocket Health Expenditure: % data was reported at 2.570 % in 2017. This records a decrease from the previous number of 3.400 % for 2011. India Proportion of Population Pushed Below the 60% Median Consumption Poverty Line By Out-of-Pocket Health Expenditure: % data is updated yearly, averaging 1.930 % from Dec 1995 (Median) to 2017, with 9 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 3.400 % in 2011 and a record low of 1.290 % in 2001. India Proportion of Population Pushed Below the 60% Median Consumption Poverty Line By Out-of-Pocket Health Expenditure: % data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s India – Table IN.World Bank.WDI: Social: Poverty and Inequality. This indicator shows the fraction of a country’s population experiencing out-of-pocket health impoverishing expenditures, defined as expenditures without which the household they live in would have been above the 60% median consumption but because of the expenditures is below the poverty line. Out-of-pocket health expenditure is defined as any spending incurred by a household when any member uses a health good or service to receive any type of care (preventive, curative, rehabilitative, long-term or palliative care); provided by any type of provider; for any type of disease, illness or health condition; in any type of setting (outpatient, inpatient, at home).;Global Health Observatory. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2023. (https://www.who.int/data/gho/data/themes/topics/financial-protection);Weighted average;This indicator is related to Sustainable Development Goal 3.8.2 [https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/metadata/].

In 2022, the total male population living in poverty in India was about ** million. By contrast, the number of females in poverty during the same time period was around ** million.

India Poverty Headcount Ratio at Societal Poverty Lines: % of Population data was reported at 33.100 % in 2021. This records a decrease from the previous number of 34.800 % for 2020. India Poverty Headcount Ratio at Societal Poverty Lines: % of Population data is updated yearly, averaging 38.450 % from Dec 1977 (Median) to 2021, with 14 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 63.500 % in 1977 and a record low of 32.400 % in 2018. India Poverty Headcount Ratio at Societal Poverty Lines: % of Population data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s India – Table IN.World Bank.WDI: Social: Poverty and Inequality. The poverty headcount ratio at societal poverty line is the percentage of a population living in poverty according to the World Bank's Societal Poverty Line. The Societal Poverty Line is expressed in purchasing power adjusted 2017 U.S. dollars and defined as max($2.15, $1.15 + 0.5*Median). This means that when the national median is sufficiently low, the Societal Poverty line is equivalent to the extreme poverty line, $2.15. For countries with a sufficiently high national median, the Societal Poverty Line grows as countries’ median income grows.;World Bank, Poverty and Inequality Platform. Data are based on primary household survey data obtained from government statistical agencies and World Bank country departments. Data for high-income economies are mostly from the Luxembourg Income Study database. For more information and methodology, please see http://pip.worldbank.org.;;The World Bank’s internationally comparable poverty monitoring database now draws on income or detailed consumption data from more than 2000 household surveys across 169 countries. See the Poverty and Inequality Platform (PIP) for details (www.pip.worldbank.org).

During 2019 to 2021, almost ** percent of the Indian population were reportedly multidimensionally poor. This reflected a much lower percentage of multidimensionally poor population in India. India has made significant progress in multidimensional poverty over the years. The share of multidimensional poor is expected to decline to around ** percent during 2022 to 2023.

[Disclaimer: This application is a DRAFT and is still under development. Your feedback is welcome.]Data Use: This map visualizes the levels of poverty across various tracts in Dallas, offering a clear picture of the economic challenges faced by different communities. By presenting data on the percentage of residents living below the poverty line, this dashboard helps users identify areas with high economic need. This understanding is vital for directing social services, economic development programs, and community support initiatives to where they are most needed, ultimately aiming to reduce poverty and improve quality of life for vulnerable populations.Data Source: U.S. Census Bureau, "Poverty Status in the Past 12 Months," American Community Survey, ACS 5-Year Estimates Subject Tables, Table S1701, 2022.Variables:S1701_C01_001E: Estimate Total Population for whom poverty status is determinedS1701_C03_001E: Estimate Percent below poverty level Population for whom poverty status is determinedS1701_C03_021E: Estimate Percent below poverty level: White alone, not Hispanic or LatinoS1701_C03_014E: Estimate Percent below poverty level: Black or African American aloneS1701_C03_015E: Estimate Percent below poverty level: American Indian and Alaska Native aloneS1701_C03_016E: Estimate Percent below poverty level: Asian aloneS1701_C03_017E: Estimate Percent below poverty level: Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander aloneS1701_C03_018E: Estimate Percent below poverty level: Some other race aloneS1701_C03_019E: Estimate Percent below poverty level: Two or more racesS1701_C03_020E: Estimate Percent below poverty level: Hispanic or Latino origin (of any race)S1701_C03_010E: Estimate Percent below poverty level: AGE 65 years and overPoverty_Rank: Poverty RankRank Scoring Process: Census tracts were grouped into quintiles based on the percentage of residents living below the poverty line (S1701_C03_001E).The scoring process categorizes each tract as follows:Score of 1: 0.4% - 5% (lowest poverty rates)Score of 2: 5.1% - 9.8%Score of 3: 9.9% - 16.3%Score of 4: 16.4% - 23.4%Score of 5: 23.4% - 80.4% (highest poverty rates)Year: 2022Provider: U.S. Census Bureau

23.90 (%) in 2022. Population below $3.1 a day is the percentage of the population living on less than $3.1 a day at 2005 international prices. As a result of revisions in PPP exchange rates, poverty rates for individual countries cannot be compared with poverty rates reported in earlier editions.

Tabular data of population by age groups, race and gender, and the poverty by race is attached to the split tract geography to create this split tract with population and poverty data. Split tract data is the product of 2020 census tracts split by 2021 incorporated city boundaries and unincorporated community/countywide statistical areas (CSA) boundaries. The census tract boundaries have been altered and aligned where necessary with legal city boundaries and unincorporated areas, including shoreline/coastal areas. Census Tract:Every 10 years the Census Bureau counts the population of the United States as mandated by Constitution. The Census Bureau (https://www.census.gov/) released 2020 geographic boundaries data including census tracts for the analysis and mapping of demographic information across the United States. City Boundary:City Boundary data is the base map information for the County of Los Angeles. These City Boundaries are based on the Los Angeles County Seamless Cadastral Landbase. The Landbase is jointly maintained by the Los Angeles County Assessor and the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works (DPW). This layer represents current city boundaries within Los Angeles County. The DPW provides the most current shapefiles representing city boundaries and city annexations. True, legal boundaries are only determined on the ground by surveyors licensed in the State of California.Countywide Statistical Areas (CSA): The countywide Statistical Area (CSA) was defined to provide a common geographic boundary for reporting departmental statistics for unincorporated areas and incorporated Los Angeles city to the Board of Supervisors. The CSA boundary and CSA names are established by the CIO and the LA County Enterprise GIS group worked with the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors Unincorporated Area and Field Deputies that reflect as best as possible the general name preferences of residents and historical names of areas. This data is primarily focused on broad statistics and reporting, not mapping of communities. This data is not designed to perfectly represent communities, nor jurisdictional boundaries such as Angeles National Forest. CSA represent board approved geographies comprised of Census block groups split by cities.Data Field:CT20: 2020 Census tractFIP21: 2021 City FIP CodeCITY: City name for incorporated cities and “Unincorporated” for unincorporated areas (as of July 1, 2021) CSA: Countywide Statistical Area (CSA) - Unincorporated area community names and LA City neighborhood names.CT20FIP21CSA: 2020 census tract with 2021 city FIPs for incorporated cities, unincorporated areas and LA neighborhoods. SPA22: 2022 Service Planning Area (SPA) number.SPA_NAME: Service Planning Area name.HD22: 2022 Health District (HD) number: HD_NAME: Health District name.POP21_AGE_0_4: 2021 population 0 to 4 years oldPOP21_AGE_5_9: 2021 population 5 to 9 years old POP21_AGE_10_14: 2021 population 10 to 14 years old POP21_AGE_15_17: 2021 population 15 to 17 years old POP21_AGE_18_19: 2021 population 18 to 19 years old POP21_AGE_20_44: 2021 population 20 to 24 years old POP21_AGE_25_29: 2021 population 25 to 29 years old POP21_AGE_30_34: 2021 population 30 to 34 years old POP21_AGE_35_44: 2021 population 35 to 44 years old POP21_AGE_45_54: 2021 population 45 to 54 years old POP21_AGE_55_64: 2021 population 55 to 64 years old POP21_AGE_65_74: 2021 population 65 to 74 years old POP21_AGE_75_84: 2021 population 75 to 84 years old POP21_AGE_85_100: 2021 population 85 years and older POP21_WHITE: 2021 Non-Hispanic White POP21_BLACK: 2021 Non-Hispanic African AmericanPOP21_AIAN: 2021 Non-Hispanic American Indian or Alaska NativePOP21_ASIAN: 2021 Non-Hispanic Asian POP21_HNPI: 2021 Non-Hispanic Hawaiian Native or Pacific IslanderPOP21_HISPANIC: 2021 HispanicPOP21_MALE: 2021 Male POP21_FEMALE: 2021 Female POV21_WHITE: 2021 Non-Hispanic White below 100% Federal Poverty Level POV21_BLACK: 2021 Non-Hispanic African American below 100% Federal Poverty Level POV21_AIAN: 2021 Non-Hispanic American Indian or Alaska Native below 100% Federal Poverty Level POV21_ASIAN: 2021 Non-Hispanic Asian below 100% Federal Poverty Level POV21_HNPI: 2021 Non-Hispanic Hawaiian Native or Pacific Islander below 100% Federal Poverty Level POV21_HISPANIC: 2021 Hispanic below 100% Federal Poverty Level POV21_TOTAL: 2021 Total population below 100% Federal Poverty Level POP21_TOTAL: 2021 Total PopulationAREA_SQMIL: Area in square milePOP21_DENSITY: Population per square mile.POV21_PERCENT: Poverty percentage.How this data created?The tabular data of population by age groups, by ethnic groups and by gender, and the poverty by ethnic groups is attributed to the split tract geography to create this data. Split tract polygon data is created by intersecting 2020 census tract polygons, LA Country City Boundary polygons and Countywide Statistical Areas (CSA) polygon data. The resulting polygon boundary aligned and matched with the legal city boundary whenever possible. Note:1. Population and poverty data estimated as of July 1, 2021. 2. 2010 Census tract and 2020 census tracts are not the same. Similarly, city and community boundary are not the same because boundary is reviewed and updated annually.

Tabular data of population by age groups, race and gender, and the poverty by ethnic groups is attached to the split tract geography to create this split tract with population and poverty data. Split tract data is the product of 2010 census tracts split by 2011 incorporated city boundaries and unincorporated community/countywide statistical areas (CSA) boundaries. The census tract boundaries have been altered and aligned where necessary with legal city boundaries and unincorporated areas, including shoreline/coastal areas. Census Tract:Every 10 years the Census Bureau counts the population of the United States as mandated by Constitution. The Census Bureau (https://www.census.gov/) released 2010 geographic boundaries data including census tracts for the analysis and mapping of demographic information across the United States. City Boundary:City Boundary data is the base map information for the County of Los Angeles. These City Boundaries are based on the Los Angeles County Seamless Cadastral Landbase. The Landbase is jointly maintained by the Los Angeles County Assessor and the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works (DPW). This layer represents current city boundaries within Los Angeles County. The DPW provides the most current shapefiles representing city boundaries and city annexations. True, legal boundaries are only determined on the ground by surveyors licensed in the State of California.Countywide Statistical Areas (CSA): The countywide Statistical Area (CSA) was defined to provide a common geographic boundary for reporting departmental statistics for unincorporated areas and incorporated Los Angeles city to the Board of Supervisors. The CSA boundary and CSA names are established by the CIO and the LA County Enterprise GIS group worked with the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors Unincorporated Area and Field Deputies that reflect as best as possible the general name preferences of residents and historical names of areas. This data is primarily focused on broad statistics and reporting, not mapping of communities. This data is not designed to perfectly represent communities, nor jurisdictional boundaries such as Angeles National Forest. CSA represent board approved geographies comprised of Census block groups split by cities.Data Field:CT10: 2010 Census tractFIP11: 2011 City FIP CodeCITY: City name for incorporated cities and “Unincorporated” for unincorporated areas (as of July 1, 2011) CT10FIP11: 2010 census tract with 2011 city FIPs for incorporated cities and unincorporated areas. SPA12: 2012 Service Planning Area (SPA) number.SPA_NAME: Service Planning Area name.HD12: 2012 Health District (HD) number: HD_NAME: Health District name.POP11_AGE_0_4: 2011 population 0 to 4 years oldPOP11_AGE_5_9: 2011 population 5 to 9 years old POP11_AGE_10_14: 2011 population 10 to 14 years old POP11_AGE_15_17: 2011 population 15 to 17 years old POP11_AGE_18_19: 2011 population 18 to 19 years old POP11_AGE_20_44: 2011 population 20 to 24 years old POP11_AGE_25_29: 2011 population 25 to 29 years old POP11_AGE_30_34: 2011 population 30 to 34 years old POP11_AGE_35_44: 2011 population 35 to 44 years old POP11_AGE_45_54: 2011 population 45 to 54 years old POP11_AGE_55_64: 2011 population 55 to 64 years old POP11_AGE_65_74: 2011 population 65 to 74 years old POP11_AGE_75_84: 2011 population 75 to 84 years old POP11_AGE_85_100: 2011 population 85 years and older POP11_WHITE: 2011 Non-Hispanic White POP11_BLACK: 2011 Non-Hispanic African AmericanPOP11_AIAN: 2011 Non-Hispanic American Indian or Alaska NativePOP11_ASIAN: 2011 Non-Hispanic Asian POP11_HNPI: 2011 Non-Hispanic Hawaiian Native or Pacific IslanderPOP11_HISPANIC: 2011 HispanicPOP11_MALE: 2011 Male POP11_FEMALE: 2011 Female POV11_WHITE: 2011 Non-Hispanic White below 100% Federal Poverty Level POV11_BLACK: 2011 Non-Hispanic African American below 100% Federal Poverty Level POV11_AIAN: 2011 Non-Hispanic American Indian or Alaska Native below 100% Federal Poverty Level POV11_ASIAN: 2011 Non-Hispanic Asian below 100% Federal Poverty Level POV11_HNPI: 2011 Non-Hispanic Hawaiian Native or Pacific Islander below 100% Federal Poverty Level POV11_HISPANIC: 2011 Hispanic below 100% Federal Poverty Level POV11_TOTAL: 2011 Total population below 100% Federal Poverty Level POP11_TOTAL: 2011 Total PopulationAREA_SQMIL: Area in square milePOP11_DENSITY: Population per square mile.POV11_PERCENT: Poverty percentage.How this data created?The tabular data of population by age groups, by ethnic groups and by gender, and the poverty by ethnic groups is attributed to the split tract geography to create this data. Split tract polygon data is created by intersecting 2010 census tract polygons, LA Country City Boundary polygons and Countywide Statistical Areas (CSA) polygon data. The resulting polygon boundary aligned and matched with the legal city boundary whenever possible. Note:1. Population and poverty data estimated as of July 1, 2011. 2. 2010 Census tract and 2020 census tracts are not the same. Similarly, city and community boundary are not the same because boundary is reviewed and updated annually.

Tabular data of population by age groups, race and gender, and the poverty by race is attached to the split tract geography to create this split tract with population and poverty data. Split tract data is the product of 2010 census tracts split by 2012 incorporated city boundaries and unincorporated community/countywide statistical areas (CSA) boundaries. The census tract boundaries have been altered and aligned where necessary with legal city boundaries and unincorporated areas, including shoreline/coastal areas. Census Tract:Every 10 years the Census Bureau counts the population of the United States as mandated by Constitution. The Census Bureau (https://www.census.gov/) released 2010 geographic boundaries data including census tracts for the analysis and mapping of demographic information across the United States. City Boundary:City Boundary data is the base map information for the County of Los Angeles. These City Boundaries are based on the Los Angeles County Seamless Cadastral Landbase. The Landbase is jointly maintained by the Los Angeles County Assessor and the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works (DPW). This layer represents current city boundaries within Los Angeles County. The DPW provides the most current shapefiles representing city boundaries and city annexations. True, legal boundaries are only determined on the ground by surveyors licensed in the State of California.Countywide Statistical Areas (CSA): The countywide Statistical Area (CSA) was defined to provide a common geographic boundary for reporting departmental statistics for unincorporated areas and incorporated Los Angeles city to the Board of Supervisors. The CSA boundary and CSA names are established by the CIO and the LA County Enterprise GIS group worked with the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors Unincorporated Area and Field Deputies that reflect as best as possible the general name preferences of residents and historical names of areas. This data is primarily focused on broad statistics and reporting, not mapping of communities. This data is not designed to perfectly represent communities, nor jurisdictional boundaries such as Angeles National Forest. CSA represent board approved geographies comprised of Census block groups split by cities.Data Field:CT10: 2010 Census tractFIP12: 2012 City FIP CodeCITY: City name for incorporated cities and “Unincorporated” for unincorporated areas (as of July 1, 2012) CT10FIP12: 2010 census tract with 2012 city FIPs for incorporated cities and unincorporated areas. SPA12: 2012 Service Planning Area (SPA) number.SPA_NAME: Service Planning Area name.HD12: 2012 Health District (HD) number: HD_NAME: Health District name.POP12_AGE_0_4: 2012 population 0 to 4 years oldPOP12_AGE_5_9: 2012 population 5 to 9 years old POP12_AGE_10_14: 2012 population 10 to 14 years old POP12_AGE_15_17: 2012 population 15 to 17 years old POP12_AGE_18_19: 2012 population 18 to 19 years old POP12_AGE_20_44: 2012 population 20 to 24 years old POP12_AGE_25_29: 2012 population 25 to 29 years old POP12_AGE_30_34: 2012 population 30 to 34 years old POP12_AGE_35_44: 2012 population 35 to 44 years old POP12_AGE_45_54: 2012 population 45 to 54 years old POP12_AGE_55_64: 2012 population 55 to 64 years old POP12_AGE_65_74: 2012 population 65 to 74 years old POP12_AGE_75_84: 2012 population 75 to 84 years old POP12_AGE_85_100: 2012 population 85 years and older POP12_WHITE: 2012 Non-Hispanic White POP12_BLACK: 2012 Non-Hispanic African AmericanPOP12_AIAN: 2012 Non-Hispanic American Indian or Alaska NativePOP12_ASIAN: 2012 Non-Hispanic Asian POP12_HNPI: 2012 Non-Hispanic Hawaiian Native or Pacific IslanderPOP12_HISPANIC: 2012 HispanicPOP12_MALE: 2012 Male POP12_FEMALE: 2012 Female POV12_WHITE: 2012 Non-Hispanic White below 100% Federal Poverty Level POV12_BLACK: 2012 Non-Hispanic African American below 100% Federal Poverty Level POV12_AIAN: 2012 Non-Hispanic American Indian or Alaska Native below 100% Federal Poverty Level POV12_ASIAN: 2012 Non-Hispanic Asian below 100% Federal Poverty Level POV12_HNPI: 2012 Non-Hispanic Hawaiian Native or Pacific Islander below 100% Federal Poverty Level POV12_HISPANIC: 2012 Hispanic below 100% Federal Poverty Level POV12_TOTAL: 2012 Total population below 100% Federal Poverty Level POP12_TOTAL: 2012 Total PopulationAREA_SQMIL: Area in square milePOP12_DENSITY: Population per square mile.POV12_PERCENT: Poverty rate/percentage.How this data created?The tabular data of population by age groups, by ethnic groups and by gender, and the poverty by ethnic groups is attributed to the split tract geography to create this data. Split tract polygon data is created by intersecting 2010 census tract polygons, LA Country City Boundary polygons and Countywide Statistical Areas (CSA) polygon data. The resulting polygon boundary aligned and matched with the legal city boundary whenever possible. Note:1. Population and poverty data estimated as of July 1, 2012. 2. 2010 Census tract and 2020 census tracts are not the same. Similarly, city and community boundary are not the same because boundary is reviewed and updated annually.

Disclaimer: This application is a DRAFT and is still under development. A look at the Equity Atlas Poverty indicator in Dallas using the methodology described below. Poverty (S1701)

Each scored category represents 20% of the total population of the City of Dallas.

A score of 5 represents that the percentage of people in poverty is between 23.4% - 80.4%..

A score of 4 represents the percentage of people in poverty is between 16.4% - 23.4%.

A score of 3 represents that the percentage of people in poverty is between 9.9% - 16.3%.

A score of 2 represents that the percentage of people in poverty is between 5.1% - 9.8%.

A score of 1 represents the percentage of people in poverty is between 0.4% - 5%.

Parameter

Data Field

Data Source

American Community Survey 5-Year Estimate 2018-2022

POVERTY STATUS IN THE PAST 12 MONTHS

U.S. Census Bureau, Table: S1701

All people that are living in poverty

Estimated percent of all people that are living in poverty as of 2018-2022

U.S. Census Bureau, Table: S1701

White people who lived in poverty

Estimated percent of all White people who lived in poverty between 2018-2022

U.S. Census Bureau, Table: S1701

Black or African American people who lived in poverty

Estimated percent of all Black or African American people who lived in poverty between 2018-2022

U.S. Census Bureau, Table: S1701

Asian people who lived in poverty

Estimated percentage of all Asian people who lived in poverty between 2018-2022

U.S. Census Bureau, Table: S1701

American Indian and Alaskan Native people who lived in poverty

Estimated percent of all American Indian and Alaskan Native people who lived in poverty between 2018-2022

U.S. Census Bureau, Table: S1701

Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander people who were living in poverty

Estimated percent of all Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander people who were living in poverty between 2018-2022

U.S. Census Bureau, Table: S1701

people of Some Other Race living in poverty

Estimated percent of all people of "Some Other Race" living in poverty between 2018-2022

U.S. Census Bureau, Table: S1701

people of two or more races living below the poverty level

Estimated percent of all people of "two or more races" living below the poverty level between 2018-2022

U.S. Census Bureau, Table: S1701

Hispanic or Latino people who were living in poverty

Estimated percentage of all Hispanic or Latino people who were living in poverty between 2018-2022

U.S. Census Bureau, Table: S1701