This file contains the lookup between Lower Layer Super Output Areas (LSOA), Local Government Districts (LGD) and Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) scores in Northern Ireland as at 31 December 2017. (File Size - 43 KB)REST URL of Feature Access Service – https://services1.arcgis.com/ESMARspQHYMw9BZ9/arcgis/rest/services/Index_of_Multiple_Deprivation_Dec_2017_Lookup_in_Northern_Ireland_2022/FeatureServer

The English Indices of Deprivation 2010 provide a relative measure of deprivation at small area level across England. Areas are ranked from least deprived to most deprived on seven different dimensions of deprivation and an overall composite measure of multiple deprivation. Most of the data underlying the 2010 Indices are for the year 2008. The domains used in the Indices of Deprivation 2010 are: income deprivation; employment deprivation; health deprivation and disability; education deprivation; crime deprivation; barriers to housing and services deprivation; and living environment deprivation. Each of these domains has its own scores and ranks, allowing users to focus on specific aspects of deprivation. In addition, two supplementary indices measure income deprivation amongst children - the Income Deprivation Affecting Children Index (IDACI) - and older people - the Income Deprivation Affecting Older People Index (IDAOPI).This data was then combined with the LSOA boundaries in ArcGIS. The first data column is the Index of Multiple Deprivation Score. The second data column is the Rank of the Index of Multiple Deprivation Score. The LSOA with a rank of 1 is the most deprived, and 32482 the least deprived, on this overall measure. The IMD 2010 was constructed by combining the seven transformed domain scores, using the following weights: * Income (22.5%) * Employment (22.5%) * Health and Disability (13.5%) * Education, Skills and Training (13.5%) * Barriers to Housing and Services (9.3%) * Crime (9.3%) * Living Environment (9.3%) The the seven domain indices are each presented in separate tables available from the DCLG website. Data sourced from Data.gov.uk: http://data.gov.uk/dataset/index-of-multiple-deprivation and LSOA data from ONS Geoportal: https://geoportal.statistics.gov.uk/geoportal/catalog/main/home.page (the dataset date in this case refers to the date the data was uploaded). GIS vector data. This dataset was first accessioned in the EDINA ShareGeo Open repository on 2013-12-06 and migrated to Edinburgh DataShare on 2017-02-22.

The 2017 Northern Ireland Multiple Deprivation Measures (NIMDM 2017) were published on 23rd November 2017. It provides information for 7 distinct types of deprivation, known as domains, along with an overall multiple deprivation measure (MDM). The NIMDM 2017 comprises of 38 indicators in total.

The NIMDM 2017 provide a mechanism for ranking areas within Northern Ireland in the order of the most deprived to the least deprived. However, they do not quantify the extent to which one area is more or less deprived than another.

The Northern Ireland Multiple Deprivation Measures 2017 report is available at https://www.nisra.gov.uk/publications/nimdm17-results

REST URL of Feature Access Service – https://services1.arcgis.com/ESMARspQHYMw9BZ9/arcgis/rest/services/Index_of_Multiple_Deprivation_Dec_2017_Lookup_in_Northern_Ireland_2022/FeatureServer

Life expectancy (LE), healthy life expectancy (HLE), disability-free life expectancy (DFLE), Slope Index of Inequality (SII) and range by national deprivation deciles using the Index of Multiple Deprivation 2015 for data periods from 2011 to 2013 to 2015 to 2017, and the Index of Multiple Deprivation 2019 for data periods from 2016 to 2018 to 2018 to 2020: England, 2011 to 2013 to 2018 to 2020.

• construct waves of accessible and well-documented panel data;
• provide these data in a convenient and timely fashion to the scientific and policy research community;
• describe health trajectories, disability and healthy life expectancy in a representative sample of the English population aged 50 and over;
• examine the relationship between economic position and health;
• investigate the determinants of economic position in older age;
• describe the timing of retirement and post-retirement labour market activity; and
• understand the relationships between social support, household structure and the transfer of assets.

• Primary Data from Wave 8 onwards (SN 8444) includes all the variables in the SL primary dataset (SN 8346) as well as day of birth, combined SIC 2003 code (5 digit), combined SOC 2000 code (4 digit), NS-SEC long version including and excluding unclassifiable and non-workers.
• Pension Age Data from Wave 8 onwards (SN 8445) includes all the variables in the SL pension age data (SN 8375) as well as year reached pension age variable.
• Detailed geographical identifier files for each wave, grouped by identifier held under SN 8423 (Index of Multiple Deprivation Score), SN 8424 (Local Authority District Pre-2009 Boundaries), SN 8438 (Local Authority District Post-2009 Boundaries), SN 8425 (Census 2001 Lower Layer Super Output Areas), SN 8434 (Census 2011 Lower Layer Super Output Areas), SN 8426(Census 2001 Middle Layer Super Output Areas), SN 8435 (Census 2011 Middle Layer Super Output Areas), SN 8427 (Population Density for Postcode Sectors), SN 8428 (Census 2001 Rural-Urban Indicators), SN 8436 (Census 2011 Rural-Urban Indicators).

• either SN 8424 (Local Authority District Pre-2009 Boundaries) or SN 8438 (Local Authority District Post-2009 Boundaries)
• either SN 8425 (Census 2001 Lower Layer Super Output Areas) or SN 8434 (Census 2011 Lower Layer Super Output Areas)
• either SN 8426 (Census 2001 Middle Layer Super Output Areas) or SN 8435 (Census 2011 Middle Layer Super Output Areas)
• either SN 8428 (Census 2001 Rural-Urban Indicators) or SN 8436 (Census 2011 Rural-Urban Indicators)

Der „German Index of Socioeconomic Deprivation“ bildet regionale sozioökonomische Unterschiede auf verschiedenen räumlichen Ebenen ab. Für die Indexbildung werden acht Indikatoren aus den drei Kerndimensionen sozialer Ungleichheit - Bildung, Beruf und Einkommen - herangezogen. Eine höhere sozioökonomische Deprivation findet sich in Teilregionen der neuen Bundesländer, aber auch im Saarland, in Nordrhein-Westfalen und in Niedersachsen. Regionen mit höherer sozioökonomischer Deprivation weisen eine geringere Lebenserwartung, eine höhere Sterblichkeit und eine Häufung von Gesundheitsrisiken auf. Der German Index of Socioeconomic Deprivation ist für Forschung und Gesundheitsberichterstattung auf verschiedenen räumlichen Ebenen und für verschiedene Jahre verfügbar. Die Gesundheitsberichterstattung erschließt durch den Index neue Datenquellen für die Analyse der gesundheitlichen Ungleichheit. Die Konstruktion des GISD wird im Juni 2017 im Rahmen einer Orginalarbeit im Journal of Health Monitoring (JOHM) des Robert Koch-Institutes beschrieben.

Life expectancy (LE), healthy life expectancy (HLE), disability-free life expectancy (DFLE) by national deprivation deciles (IMD15), England: 2011 to 2017.

Utilising a regression analysis we created a correlation matrix utilising a number of demographic indicators from the Local Insight platform. This application is showing the distribution of the datasets that were found to have the strongest relationships, with the base comparison dataset of Indices of Deprivation 2019 adult skills and english language proficiency indicator. This app contains the following datasets: percentage of people who participate in sport and physical activity at least twice in the last 28 days (2016/17), percentage of people who participate in sport and physical activity at least twice in the last 28 days (2017/18), percentage of people who participate in sport and physical activity at least twice in the last 28 days (2018/19), Indices of Deprivation 2019 education, skills and training ranking, modelled estimated percentage of physically inactive adults (2017/18), Indices of Deprivation 2015 education, skills and training ranking, rate of households deprived in two dimensions, proportion of people with ICT multiple choice skills at entry level 1 (2011), proportion of people aged 25 to 34 with no qualifications and modelled estimated percentage of physically active adults (2017/18).

The European Deprivation Index was developed under the Townsend theorization of deprivation. Using data from the European Union - Statistics on Income and Living Conditions Survey, we obtained an indicator of individual deprivation. This indicator became the gold-standard variable, based on what we selected the variables at aggregate level (census 2001) to be included in the European Deprivation Index, a total of eight. The European Deprivation Index was produced for the smallest area unit possible (n = 16 094, mean/area = 643 inhabitants), parish level and municipality level, and resulted from the weighted sum of the previous variables. It was then classified into quintiles.More details here:Ribeiro, A. I., Mayer, A., Miranda, A., & Pina, M. F. (2017). The Portuguese Version of the European Deprivation Index: An Instrument to Study Health Inequalities. Acta Med Port, 30(1), 17-25. Guillaume, E., Pornet, C., Dejardin, O., Launay, L., Lillini, R., Vercelli, M., . . . Launoy, G. (2016). Development of a cross-cultural deprivation index in five European countries. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 70(5), 493-499. doi:10.1136/jech-2015-205729

Life expectancy (LE), healthy life expectancy (HLE), disability-free life expectancy (DFLE), slope index of inequality (SII) and range at birth and age 65 by national deprivation deciles (IMD15), England, 2011 to 2017.

The updated deprivation measures were released on 23rd November 2017 replacing the NIMDM 2010 as the official measure of deprivation in Northern Ireland and were awarded a prestigious Campion Award for Excellence in Official Statistics by the Royal Statistical Society and the UK Statistics Authority in 2018.The measure ranks each of Northern Ireland's Super Output Areas (SOAs) in order of their deprivation index from most deprived (Rank 1) to least deprived (Rank 890). More information this can be found at the NISRA Website. What can you do with the layer?Visualisation: This layer can be used for visualisation online in web maps and in ArcGIS Desktop.Analysis: This layer can be used in dashboards.Download: The data is downloadable.This layer is part of the Living Atlas of the World that provides access to thousands of beautiful and authoritative layers, web maps, and apps.

Dataset Name: Multiple Deprivation Measure Rank 2010Data Owner: NISRAContact: deprivation@nisra.gov.ukSource URL: https://www.nisra.gov.uk/statistics/deprivation/northern-ireland-multiple-deprivation-measure-2017-nimdm2017Uploaded to SPACE Hub: 31/07/2023Update Frequency: As released by NISRAScale Threshold: N/AProjection : Irish GridFormat: Esri Feature Layer (Hosted) Vector PolygonNotes: Northern Ireland Multiple Deprivation Measure 2010 (NIMDM2010)The Northern Ireland Multiple Deprivation Measure 2017 is the official measure of spatial deprivation for Northern Ireland. Prior to 23 November 2017, the Northern Ireland Multiple Deprivation Measure 2010 was the official measure of spatial deprivation for Northern Ireland. The Northern Ireland Multiple Deprivation Measure (NIMDM) 2010 report was published on 26 May 2010. The NIMDM 2010 replaced the Northern Ireland Multiple Deprivation Measure 2005 as the official measure of spatial deprivation in Northern Ireland.NISRA released the Northern Ireland Multiple Deprivation Measure (NIDMDM) 2010 results on 31st March 2010. The Super Output Area (SOA) level results are available to download. Also available are maps of the SOA multiple deprivation measure and individual domains, a press release and a list of the indicators used in the updated deprivation measure.The Northern Ireland Multiple Deprivation Measure 2010 report (also available in large print) was published on 26 May 2010 along with further deprivation data at Output Area, Electoral Ward, Local Government District and Assembly Area levels. A description of indicators document and a guidance leaflet are available.The NIMDM 2010 is made up from 52 indicators mostly relating to the period 2007-2009. The indicators are grouped into seven types of 'domains' of deprivation weighted as follows:Income Deprivation 25%Employment Deprivation 25%Health Deprivation and Disability 15%Education, Skills and Training Deprivation 15%Proximity to Services 10%Living Environment 5%Crime and Disorder 5%Information on changes to Super Output Areas and the new Small Areas, following the 2011 Census, is available on the NISRA Geography page.In keeping with equality guidelines a policy screening form for the update to the measures has been completed.It is not advised to compare the deprivation measures across the UK as data definitions, collection methods and base populations are not the same across Northern Ireland, England, Scotland and Wales. In November 2010 NISRA produced a recommendations document which sets out the recommendations for future deprivation measures.

The National Material and Social Deprivation Indices (MSDI) for all Canadian Census enumeration areas (now called dissemination areas) were downloaded July 21, 2017 by CANUE staff from the INSPQ website. The indices were provided in Excel spreadsheets named TableEquivalenceCompleteCanada1991.xlxs; TableEquivalenceCompleteCanada1996.xlxs; TableEquivalenceCompleteCanada2001.xlxs; TableEquivalenceCompleteCanada2006.xlxs; andTableEquivalenceCompleteCanada2011.xlxs. Data for 2016 were provided directly to CANUE by INSPQ.ArcGIS was used by CANUE staff to associate the single link DMTI Spatial postal codes to the Statistics Canada enumeration/dissemination area boundary file, and then spatially join the MSDI data to DMTI single link postal codes using enumeration or dissemination area as a unique identifier. There may be many postal codes within a single enumeration or dissemination area - these will have the same index values. CANUE staff translated the variable names from French to English and added a distance attribute (maximum distance from postal code centroid to boundary of census area).

Life expectancy (LE), healthy life expectancy (HLE), disability-free life expectancy (DFLE) by national deprivation deciles (WIMD14), Wales: 2011 to 2017.

In this analysis we have combined several data sources around the floods in Bangladesh in August 2017.

Visualization

• See attached map for a map visualization of this analysis.
• See http://bit.ly/2uFezkY for a more interactive visualization in Carto.

Situation

Currently, in Bangladesh many water level measuring stations measure water levels that are above danger levels. This sets in triggers in motion for the partnership of the 510 Data Intitiative and the Red Cross Climate Centre to get into action.

Indicators and sources

In the attached map, we combined several sources:

• Locations of waterlevel stations and their respective excess water levels (cms above danger level) at 14/08/2017 (Source: http://www.ffwc.gov.bd/index.php/googlemap?id=20)
• Population density in Bangladesh to quickly see where many people live in comaprison to these higher water-level stations. (Source: http://www.worldpop.org.uk/data/summary/?doi=10.5258/SOTON/WP00018 >> the People per hectare 2015 UN-adjusted totals file is used.)
• Vulnerability Index: we constructed a Vulnerability Index (0-10) based on two sources. First poverty incidence was collected from Worldpop (Source: http://www.worldpop.org.uk/data/summary/?doi=10.5258/SOTON/WP00020 >> The estimated likelihood of living below $2.50/day). Second, we used a Deprivation Index which is estimated in the report Lagging District Reports 2015 (Source: http://www.plancomm.gov.bd/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/15_Lagging-Regions-Study.pdf > Appendices > Table 20), which combines many socio-economic variables into one Deprivation Index through PCA analysis.

Detailed methodology Vulnerability

• The above-mentioned poverty source file is on a raster level. This raster level poverty was transformed to admin-4 level geographic areas (source: https://data.humdata.org/dataset/bangladesh-admin-level-4-boundaries), by taking a population-weighted average. (Source population also Worldpop).
• The district-level PCA components from abovementioned reports were matched to the geodata based on district names, and thus joined to the admin-4 level areas, which now contain a poverty value as well as Deprivation Index value. Note that all admin-4 areas within one district (admin-2) obviously all have the same value. The poverty rates do differ between all admin-4 areas.
• Lastly, both variables were transformed to a 0-10 score (linearly), and a geomean was taken to calculate the final index of the two. A geomean (as opposed to an arithmetic mean) is often used in calculating composite risk indices, for example in the widely used INFORM-framework (www.inform-index.org).

Dataset Name: Multiple Deprivation Measure Rank 2010Data Owner: NISRAContact: deprivation@nisra.gov.ukSource URL: https://www.nisra.gov.uk/statistics/deprivation/northern-ireland-multiple-deprivation-measure-2017-nimdm2017Uploaded to SPACE Hub: 31/07/2023Update Frequency: As released by NISRAScale Threshold: N/AProjection : Irish GridFormat: Esri Feature Layer (Hosted) Vector PolygonNotes: Northern Ireland Multiple Deprivation Measure 2010 (NIMDM2010)The Northern Ireland Multiple Deprivation Measure 2017 is the official measure of spatial deprivation for Northern Ireland. Prior to 23 November 2017, the Northern Ireland Multiple Deprivation Measure 2010 was the official measure of spatial deprivation for Northern Ireland. The Northern Ireland Multiple Deprivation Measure (NIMDM) 2010 report was published on 26 May 2010. The NIMDM 2010 replaced the Northern Ireland Multiple Deprivation Measure 2005 as the official measure of spatial deprivation in Northern Ireland.NISRA released the Northern Ireland Multiple Deprivation Measure (NIDMDM) 2010 results on 31st March 2010. The Super Output Area (SOA) level results are available to download. Also available are maps of the SOA multiple deprivation measure and individual domains, a press release and a list of the indicators used in the updated deprivation measure.The Northern Ireland Multiple Deprivation Measure 2010 report (also available in large print) was published on 26 May 2010 along with further deprivation data at Output Area, Electoral Ward, Local Government District and Assembly Area levels. A description of indicators document and a guidance leaflet are available.The NIMDM 2010 is made up from 52 indicators mostly relating to the period 2007-2009. The indicators are grouped into seven types of 'domains' of deprivation weighted as follows:Income Deprivation 25%Employment Deprivation 25%Health Deprivation and Disability 15%Education, Skills and Training Deprivation 15%Proximity to Services 10%Living Environment 5%Crime and Disorder 5%Information on changes to Super Output Areas and the new Small Areas, following the 2011 Census, is available on the NISRA Geography page.In keeping with equality guidelines a policy screening form for the update to the measures has been completed.It is not advised to compare the deprivation measures across the UK as data definitions, collection methods and base populations are not the same across Northern Ireland, England, Scotland and Wales. In November 2010 NISRA produced a recommendations document which sets out the recommendations for future deprivation measures.

Urbanisation brings with it rapid socio-economic change with volatile livelihoods and unstable ownership of assets. Yet, current measures of wealth are based predominantly on static livelihoods found in rural areas. We sought to assess the extent to which seven common measures of wealth appropriately capture vulnerability to poverty in urban areas. We then sought to develop a measure that captures the characteristics of one urban area in Nepal. We collected and analysed data from 1,180 households collected during a survey conducted between November 2017 and January 2018 and designed to be representative of the Kathmandu valley. A separate survey of a sub set of households was conducted using participatory qualitative methods in slum and non-slum neighbourhoods. A series of currently used indices of deprivation were calculated from questionnaire data. We used bivariate statistical methods to examine the association between each index and identify characteristics of poor and non-poor. Qualitative data was used to identify characteristics of poverty from the perspective of urban poor communities which were used to construct an Urban Poverty Index that combined asset and consumption focused context specific measures of poverty that could be proxied by easily measured indicators as assessed through multivariate modelling. We found a strong but not perfect association between each measure of poverty. There was disagreement when comparing the consumption and deprivation index on the classification of 19% of the sample. Choice of short-term monetary and longer-term capital approaches accounted for much of the difference. Those who reported migrating due to economic necessity were most likely to be categorised as poor. A combined index was developed to capture these dimension of poverty and understand urban vulnerability. A second version of the index was constructed that can be computed using a smaller range of variables to identify those in poverty. Current measures may hide important aspects of urban poverty. Those who migrate out of economic necessity are particularly vulnerable. A composite index of socioeconomic status helps to capture the complex nature of economic vulnerability.

Life expectancy (LE), healthy life expectancy (HLE), disability-free life expectancy (DFLE) by national deprivation quintiles (WIMD 2019), Wales, 2017 to 2019.