48 datasets found
  1. Opinion of U.S. adults on Biden's responsibility for inflation rate 2022

    • statista.com
    Updated Aug 12, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2024). Opinion of U.S. adults on Biden's responsibility for inflation rate 2022 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1307099/biden-perceived-responsibility-inflation-rate-us/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Aug 12, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    Jul 9, 2022 - Jul 11, 2022
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    According to a survey conducted between July 9 and July 11, 2022, 45 percent of Americans thought that Joe Biden was highly responsible for the current trend in the inflation rate. This is compared to 26 percent of Americans who said President Biden did not have a lot of responsibility for the current inflation rate.

    Inflation in the U.S. Global events in 2022 had a significant impact on the United States. Inflation rose from 1.4 percent in January 2021 to 9.1 percent in June 2022. Significantly higher prices of basic goods led to increased concern over the state of the economy, and the ability to cover increasing monthly costs with the same income. Low interest rates, COVID-19-related supply constraints, corporate profiteering, and strong consumer spending had already put pressure on prices before Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. Despite rising wages on paper, the rapid growth of consumer prices resulted in an overall decline in real hourly earnings in the first half of 2022.

    How much control does Joe Biden have over inflation? The bulk of economic performance and the inflation rate is determined by factors outside the President’s direct control, but U.S. presidents are often held accountable for it. Some of those factors are market forces, private business, productivity growth, the state of the global economy, and policies of the Federal Reserve. Although high-spending decisions such as the 2021 COVID-19 relief bill may have contributed to rising inflation rates, the bill has been seen by economists as a necessary intervention for preventing a recession at the time, as well as being of significant importance to low-income workers impacted by the pandemic.

    The most important tool for curbing inflation and controlling the U.S. economy is the Federal Reserve. The Reserve has the ability to set, raise, and lower interest rates and determine the wider monetary policy for the United States – something out of the president’s control. In June 2022, the Reserve announced it would raise interest rates 0.75 percent for the second time that year – hoisting the rate to a target range of 2.25 to 2.5 percent – in an attempt to slow consumer demand and balance demand with supply. However, it can often take time before the impacts of interventions by the Federal Reserve are seen in the public’s day-to-day lives. Most economists expect this wave of inflation to pass in a year to 18 months.

  2. U.S. adults economic and political predictions for 2023

    • statista.com
    Updated Aug 9, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2024). U.S. adults economic and political predictions for 2023 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1357896/americans-economic-political-predictions-us/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Aug 9, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    Dec 5, 2022 - Dec 19, 2022
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    According to a poll conducted at the end of 2022, Americans were feeling quite pessimistic about the coming year. 90 percent of Americans felt negatively about the prospect of political conflict in 2023.

    The Economy 2022 was a difficult year for many Americans, as it was for many around the world. After a year of high inflation, record fuel prices, and decreased financial security, the country greeted 2023 with high rates of skepticism and caution. Although the U.S. economy itself has experienced a strong rebound from the pandemic recession compared with other major economies, a sustained decline in consumer spending power thanks to wage growth not keeping pace with inflation has everyday Americans feeling the pinch.

    U.S. political landscape The political scene in the U.S. also had a tumultuous few years in the lead up to 2023. The election of Donald Trump as the 45th President of the United States in 2016 left many voters reeling and the country more divided than ever. The beginning of 2021 was market by the January 6th attack on the Capitol, as well as the inauguration of Joe Biden. Additionally, the country continued to grapple with a politicized response to the COVID-19 pandemic and associated restrictions. 2022 began with the Russian invasion of Ukraine, ushering in the beginning of a global fuel and inflation crisis. In the midst of hardening economic conditions, the Supreme Court overturned its ruling on Roe v. Wade, returning the power to decide abortion restrictions to state legislatures.

    The 2022 midterm elections saw Republicans win enough seats to take back control of the House of Representatives, but saw the GOP ultimately underperform compared to predictions at the time. The first day of the 2023 congressional term was marked by the inability of the Republican Party to unify itself behind one candidate for Speaker of the House, leading to a once in a century multi-round of Speaker elections. With new members of the House not able to be sworn in until a Speaker is elected, 2023 had a difficult start.

  3. President Biden Approval - Inflation

    • realclearpolling.com
    Updated Jul 31, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Real Clear Polling (2025). President Biden Approval - Inflation [Dataset]. https://www.realclearpolling.com/polls/approval/joe-biden/issues/inflation
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 31, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    RealClearPoliticshttps://realclearpolitics.com/
    Authors
    Real Clear Polling
    Description

    President Biden Approval - Inflation | RealClearPolling

  4. IRA funds obligated under Biden administration in the U.S. January 2025, by...

    • statista.com
    Updated Jul 18, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    IRA funds obligated under Biden administration in the U.S. January 2025, by project [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1550495/inflation-reduction-act-funds-obligated-united-states/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 18, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    Before handing over to President Trump, President Biden's administration in the United States obligated the spending of ** percent of the clean energy funds allocated by the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) awarded ** billion U.S. dollars in binding contracts signed as of January 2025.

  5. Replication dataset and calculations for PIIE WP 24-20 The International...

    • piie.com
    Updated Sep 26, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Warwick J. McKibbin; Megan Hogan; Marcus Noland (2024). Replication dataset and calculations for PIIE WP 24-20 The International Economic Implications of a Second Trump Presidency by Warwick McKibbin, Megan Hogan, and Marcus Noland (2024). [Dataset]. https://www.piie.com/publications/working-papers/2024/international-economic-implications-second-trump-presidency
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Sep 26, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Peterson Institute for International Economicshttp://www.piie.com/
    Authors
    Warwick J. McKibbin; Megan Hogan; Marcus Noland
    Description

    This data package includes the underlying data to replicate the charts and calculations presented in The International Economic Implications of a Second Trump Presidency, PIIE Working Paper 24-20.

    If you use the data, please cite as:

    McKibbin, Warwick, Megan Hogan, and Marcus Noland. 2024. The International Economic Implications of a Second Trump Presidency. PIIE Working Paper 24-20. Washington: Peterson Institute for International Economics.

  6. U.S. debt growth 1969-2023, by president

    • statista.com
    Updated Jun 27, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    U.S. debt growth 1969-2023, by president [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1366899/percent-change-national-debt-president-us/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 27, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    Adding to national debt is an inevitable fact of being President of the United States. The extent to which debt rises under any sitting president depends not only on the policy and spending choices they have made, but also the choices made by presidents and congresses that have come before them. Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush President Ronald Reagan increased the U.S. debt by around **** trillion U.S. dollars, or ****** percent. This is often attributed to "Reaganomics," in which Reagan implemented significant supply-side economic policies in which he reduced government regulation, cut taxes, and tightened the money supply. Spending increased under President George W. Bush in light of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. To finance the wars, President Bush chose to borrow the money, rather than use war bonds or increase taxes, unlike previous war-time presidents. Additionally, Bush introduced a number of tax cuts, and oversaw the beginning of the 2008 financial crisis. Barack Obama President Obama inherited both wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and the financial crisis. The Obama administration also did not increase taxes to pay for the wars, and additionally passed expensive legislation to kickstart the economy following the economic crash, as well as the Affordable Care Act in 2010. The ACA expanded healthcare coverage to cover more than ** million more Americans through programs like Medicare and Medicaid. Though controversial at the time, more than half of Americans have a favorable view of the ACA in 2023. Additionally, he signed legislation making the W. Bush-era tax cuts permanent.

  7. f

    Elections, heterogeneity of central bankers and inflationary pressure: The...

    • scielo.figshare.com
    tiff
    Updated Jun 1, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Mauricio S. Bugarin; Fabia A. de Carvalho (2023). Elections, heterogeneity of central bankers and inflationary pressure: The case for staggered terms for the president and the central banker [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.19928010.v1
    Explore at:
    tiffAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 1, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    SciELO journals
    Authors
    Mauricio S. Bugarin; Fabia A. de Carvalho
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Abstract This paper analyzes a signaling model of monetary policy when inflation targets are not set by the monetary authority. The most important implication of the model’s solution is that a higher ex-ante dispersion in central bankers’ preferences, referred to as heterogeneity in policy orientation, increases the signaling cost of commitment to inflation targets. The model allows for a comparison of two distinct institutional arrangements regarding the tenure in office of the central banker and the head of government. We find that staggered terms yield superior equilibria when opportunistic political business cycles can arise from presidential elections. This is a consequence of a reduction of information asymmetry about monetary policy, and gives theoretic support to the observed practice of staggered terms among independent central banks.

  8. Monthly inflation rates in developed and emerging countries 2021-2024

    • statista.com
    • ai-chatbox.pro
    Updated Jun 23, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2025). Monthly inflation rates in developed and emerging countries 2021-2024 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1034154/monthly-inflation-rates-developed-emerging-countries/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 23, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    Jan 2021 - Dec 2024
    Area covered
    Worldwide
    Description

    Of the major developed and emerging economies, China had the lowest inflation rate at *** percent in December 2024. On the other end of the spectrum, the inflation rate in Russia stood at nearly ** percent. The country's inflation rate increased sharply after the country's President, Vladimir Putin, decided to invade Ukraine, declined somewhat in 2023, before increasing slowly again since. The rate of inflation reflects changes in the cost of a specified basket containing a representative selection of goods and services. It is derived from the consumer price index (CPI).

  9. N

    President Township, Pennsylvania Median Household Income Trends (2010-2023,...

    • neilsberg.com
    csv, json
    Updated Mar 3, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Neilsberg Research (2025). President Township, Pennsylvania Median Household Income Trends (2010-2023, in 2023 inflation-adjusted dollars) [Dataset]. https://www.neilsberg.com/insights/president-township-pa-median-household-income/
    Explore at:
    json, csvAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Mar 3, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Neilsberg Research
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    President Township, Pennsylvania
    Variables measured
    Median Household Income, Median Household Income Year on Year Change, Median Household Income Year on Year Percent Change
    Measurement technique
    The data presented in this dataset is derived from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2019-2023 5-Year Estimates. It presents the median household income from the years 2010 to 2023 following an initial analysis and categorization of the census data. Subsequently, we adjusted these figures for inflation using the Consumer Price Index retroactive series via current methods (R-CPI-U-RS). For additional information about these estimations, please contact us via email at research@neilsberg.com
    Dataset funded by
    Neilsberg Research
    Description
    About this dataset

    Context

    The dataset illustrates the median household income in President township, spanning the years from 2010 to 2023, with all figures adjusted to 2023 inflation-adjusted dollars. Based on the latest 2019-2023 5-Year Estimates from the American Community Survey, it displays how income varied over the last decade. The dataset can be utilized to gain insights into median household income trends and explore income variations.

    Key observations:

    From 2010 to 2023, the median household income for President township decreased by $3,389 (5.77%), as per the American Community Survey estimates. In comparison, median household income for the United States increased by $5,602 (7.68%) between 2010 and 2023.

    Analyzing the trend in median household income between the years 2010 and 2023, spanning 13 annual cycles, we observed that median household income, when adjusted for 2023 inflation using the Consumer Price Index retroactive series (R-CPI-U-RS), experienced growth year by year for 6 years and declined for 7 years.

    Content

    When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2019-2023 5-Year Estimates. All incomes have been adjusting for inflation and are presented in 2022-inflation-adjusted dollars.

    Years for which data is available:

    • 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 0223

    Variables / Data Columns

    • Year: This column presents the data year from 2010 to 2023
    • Median Household Income: Median household income, in 2023 inflation-adjusted dollars for the specific year
    • YOY Change($): Change in median household income between the current and the previous year, in 2023 inflation-adjusted dollars
    • YOY Change(%): Percent change in median household income between current and the previous year

    Good to know

    Margin of Error

    Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.

    Custom data

    If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.

    Inspiration

    Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.

    Recommended for further research

    This dataset is a part of the main dataset for President township median household income. You can refer the same here

  10. Inflation rate in Egypt 2030

    • statista.com
    Updated May 15, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2025). Inflation rate in Egypt 2030 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/377354/inflation-rate-in-egypt/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    May 15, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Area covered
    Egypt
    Description

    In 2018, the average inflation rate in Egypt amounted to about 20.85 percent, a slight decrease compared to the previous year, when it peaked at 23.53 percent.

    Political unrest

    Egypt has been shaken by political unrest and turmoil for years now, and these events affect the economy as well. On January 25, 2011, Egyptians started protesting police brutality under then-president Hosni Mubarak, demanding an end to his reign. The protests were met with violence by armed forces, resulting in more unrest and looting. In the end, hundreds of Egyptians had lost their lives and over 6,000 were injured. After Mubarak’s subsequent resignation and the Muslim Brotherhood taking power in the country, Mohamed Morsi was elected President in 2012. He also was overthrown a year later after protests and was imprisoned. The current President, Abdel Fattah es-Sisi, was involved in overthrowing Morsi and took office in June 2014. Sisi introduced a number of economic reforms, but they did not succeed in stabilizing Egypt’s economy.

    Economic unrest

    2017 saw the Egyptian inflation rate skyrocket from 10.2 percent in 2016 to more than double that at 23.5 percent. Ever since, inflation has recovered only slowly, although projections today see it levelling off below ten percent in the future. Around the same year, Egypt’s GDP dropped to below 240 billion U.S. dollars, a historical low. Unemployment, another key indicator, has steadily been between 12 to 13 percent - one reason for this is Egypt’s reliance on agriculture, which does not factor into the unemployment rate. National debt has also increased dramatically over the last few years. All in all, the times of economic unrest are not yet over.

  11. BIL and IRA Funded Projects, Fiscal Years 2022-2025

    • onemap-bia-geospatial.hub.arcgis.com
    • s.cnmilf.com
    • +2more
    Updated Feb 15, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Bureau of Indian Affairs (2024). BIL and IRA Funded Projects, Fiscal Years 2022-2025 [Dataset]. https://onemap-bia-geospatial.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/BIA-Geospatial::bil-and-ira-funded-projects-fiscal-years-2022-2025
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Feb 15, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Bureau of Indian Affairshttp://www.bia.gov/
    Area covered
    Description

    On November 15, 2021, President Biden signed the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL), which invests more than $13 billion directly in Tribal communities across the country and makes Tribal communities eligible for billions more. For further explanation of the law please visit https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/3684/text. These resources go to many Federal agencies to expand access to clean drinking water for Native communities, ensure every Native American has access to high-speed internet, tackle the climate crisis, advance environmental justice, and invest in Tribal communities that have too often been left behind. On August 16, 2022, President Biden signed the Inflation Reduction Act into law, marking the most significant action Congress has taken on clean energy and climate change in the nation’s history. With the stroke of his pen, the President redefined American leadership in confronting the existential threat of the climate crisis and set forth a new era of American innovation and ingenuity to lower consumer costs and drive the global clean energy economy forward. More information on this can be found here: https://www.whitehouse.gov/cleanenergy/inflation-reduction-act-guidebook/. This dataset illustrates the locations of Bureau of Indian Affairs projects funded by the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law and Inflation Reduction Act in Fiscal Year 2022, 2023, and 2024. The points illustrated in this dataset are the locations of Bureau of Indian Affairs projects funded by the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law and Inflation Reduction Act in Fiscal Year 2022 and 2023. The locations for the points in this layer were provided by the persons involved in the following groups: Division of Water and Power, DWP, Ecosystem Restoration, Irrigation, Power, Water Sanitation, Dam Safety, Branch of Geospatial Support, Bureau of Indian Affairs, BIA.GIS point feature class was created by Bureau of Indian Affairs - Branch Of Geospatial Support (BOGS), Division of Water and Power (DWP), Ecosystem Restoration, Irrigation, Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA), Tribal Leaders Directory: https://www.bia.gov/service/tribal-leaders-directory/tld-csvexcel-dataset, The Department of the Interior | Strategic Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Project: https://www.doi.gov/emergency/shira#main-content

  12. Inflation rate of Iran 2030

    • statista.com
    Updated May 21, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2025). Inflation rate of Iran 2030 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/294320/iran-inflation-rate/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    May 21, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Area covered
    Iran
    Description

    Iran’s inflation rate rose sharply to 34.79 percent in 2019 and was projected to rise another 14 percentage points before slowly starting to decline. Given the recent sanctions by the United States regarding the nuclear deal, this number has both political and economic implications. Political implications President Hassan Rouhani won the 2017 election based on economic promises, many stemming from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), commonly known as the Iran Nuclear Deal. Lifting these sanctions opened the Iranian economy to many opportunities, including the chance to benefit from increased oil exports. The JCPOA was an integral part of the Rouhani campaign, so any economic hardship that is linked to the deal will likely be blamed on the president. Economic implications High inflation leads to high interest rates, which leads to less borrowing. Less borrowing means less investment, which slows economic growth. This slower growth often leads to higher inflation, which is what economists call an inflationary spiral. As such, Iran will have difficulty achieving substantial GDP growth until inflation returns to manageable rates.

  13. Washington Post Poll, June 1988

    • icpsr.umich.edu
    ascii
    Updated Feb 16, 1992
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    The Washington Post (1992). Washington Post Poll, June 1988 [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09065.v1
    Explore at:
    asciiAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Feb 16, 1992
    Dataset provided by
    Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Researchhttps://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/pages/
    Authors
    The Washington Post
    License

    https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/studies/9065/termshttps://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/studies/9065/terms

    Time period covered
    Jun 15, 1988 - Jun 19, 1988
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    This survey focuses on a variety of social and political issues with an emphasis on the Reagan presidency and the drug problem in the United States. Respondents were asked if they approved or disapproved of Reagan's handling of the presidency, what had been Reagan's greatest successes and failures as president, what grade the respondent would give the Reagan administration for it's handling over the past eight years of such problems as unemployment, inflation, poverty, crime, and improving the quality of public education. In addition, respondents were asked if they agreed or disagreed with a series of statements regarding Reagan's policies and performance, and what changes they perceived as a result of the Reagan presidency in areas such as military power, federal spending, and United States influence in the world. Topics covered in the series of questions relating to drugs include legalization of cocaine, the respondent's degree of concern about various problems relating to illegal drugs, if illegal drugs were a problem in the respondent's general neighborhood, high school, and workplace, mandatory drug testing, and various proposed measures to reduce the drug problem. Respondents also were asked their preference for presidential candidates George Bush or Michael Dukakis and the strength of their support. Background information on respondents includes political alignment, 1984 presidential vote choice, education, age, religion, marital status, household composition, labor union membership, race, income, and state/region of residence.

  14. N

    Income Distribution by Quintile: Mean Household Income in President...

    • neilsberg.com
    csv, json
    Updated Jan 11, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Neilsberg Research (2024). Income Distribution by Quintile: Mean Household Income in President Township, Pennsylvania [Dataset]. https://www.neilsberg.com/research/datasets/94e6f03b-7479-11ee-949f-3860777c1fe6/
    Explore at:
    json, csvAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jan 11, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Neilsberg Research
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    President Township, Pennsylvania
    Variables measured
    Income Level, Mean Household Income
    Measurement technique
    The data presented in this dataset is derived from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2017-2021 5-Year Estimates. It delineates income distributions across income quintiles (mentioned above) following an initial analysis and categorization. Subsequently, we adjusted these figures for inflation using the Consumer Price Index retroactive series via current methods (R-CPI-U-RS). For additional information about these estimations, please contact us via email at research@neilsberg.com
    Dataset funded by
    Neilsberg Research
    Description
    About this dataset

    Context

    The dataset presents the mean household income for each of the five quintiles in President Township, Pennsylvania, as reported by the U.S. Census Bureau. The dataset highlights the variation in mean household income across quintiles, offering valuable insights into income distribution and inequality.

    Key observations

    • Income disparities: The mean income of the lowest quintile (20% of households with the lowest income) is 15,484, while the mean income for the highest quintile (20% of households with the highest income) is 160,189. This indicates that the top earners earn 10 times compared to the lowest earners.
    • *Top 5%: * The mean household income for the wealthiest population (top 5%) is 227,969, which is 142.31% higher compared to the highest quintile, and 1472.29% higher compared to the lowest quintile.

    Mean household income by quintiles in President Township, Pennsylvania (in 2022 inflation-adjusted dollars))

    Content

    When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2017-2021 5-Year Estimates.

    Income Levels:

    • Lowest Quintile
    • Second Quintile
    • Third Quintile
    • Fourth Quintile
    • Highest Quintile
    • Top 5 Percent

    Variables / Data Columns

    • Income Level: This column showcases the income levels (As mentioned above).
    • Mean Household Income: Mean household income, in 2022 inflation-adjusted dollars for the specific income level.

    Good to know

    Margin of Error

    Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.

    Custom data

    If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.

    Inspiration

    Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.

    Recommended for further research

    This dataset is a part of the main dataset for President township median household income. You can refer the same here

  15. d

    Data from: Diversionary Cheap Talk: Economic Conditions and US Foreign...

    • search.dataone.org
    • dataverse.harvard.edu
    Updated Nov 22, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Carter, Erin Baggott (2023). Diversionary Cheap Talk: Economic Conditions and US Foreign Policy Rhetoric, 1945-2010 [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/8XUKIH
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 22, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Harvard Dataverse
    Authors
    Carter, Erin Baggott
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    This study explains how the economy affects the foreign policy rhetoric used by American presidents. When economic conditions deteriorate, presidents criticize foreign nations to boost their approval ratings. Presidents use this "diversionary cheap talk" in response to the misery index of unemployment plus inflation, which poses a unique threat to their popularity. They target historical rivals, which make intergroup distinctions most salient. Diversionary cheap talk is most influential for and most frequently used by Democratic presidents, whose non-core constituents prefer hawkish foreign policy but already expect it from Republican presidents. I test the observable implications of the theory with the American Diplomacy Dataset, an original record of 50,000 American foreign policy events between 1851 and 2010 drawn from a corpus of 1.3 million New York Times articles.

  16. N

    President Township, Pennsylvania Median Income by Age Groups Dataset: A...

    • neilsberg.com
    csv, json
    Updated Feb 25, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Neilsberg Research (2025). President Township, Pennsylvania Median Income by Age Groups Dataset: A Comprehensive Breakdown of President township Annual Median Income Across 4 Key Age Groups // 2025 Edition [Dataset]. https://www.neilsberg.com/research/datasets/e952c2b7-f353-11ef-8577-3860777c1fe6/
    Explore at:
    csv, jsonAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Feb 25, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Neilsberg Research
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    President Township, Pennsylvania
    Variables measured
    Income for householder under 25 years, Income for householder 65 years and over, Income for householder between 25 and 44 years, Income for householder between 45 and 64 years
    Measurement technique
    The data presented in this dataset is derived from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2019-2023 5-Year Estimates. It delineates income distributions across four age groups (Under 25 years, 25 to 44 years, 45 to 64 years, and 65 years and over) following an initial analysis and categorization. Subsequently, we adjusted these figures for inflation using the Consumer Price Index retroactive series via current methods (R-CPI-U-RS). For additional information about these estimations, please contact us via email at research@neilsberg.com
    Dataset funded by
    Neilsberg Research
    Description
    About this dataset

    Context

    The dataset presents the distribution of median household income among distinct age brackets of householders in President township. Based on the latest 2019-2023 5-Year Estimates from the American Community Survey, it displays how income varies among householders of different ages in President township. It showcases how household incomes typically rise as the head of the household gets older. The dataset can be utilized to gain insights into age-based household income trends and explore the variations in incomes across households.

    Key observations: Insights from 2023

    In terms of income distribution across age cohorts, in President township, the median household income stands at $91,250 for householders within the 45 to 64 years age group, followed by $51,250 for the 25 to 44 years age group. Notably, householders within the 65 years and over age group, had the lowest median household income at $44,250.

    Content

    When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2019-2023 5-Year Estimates. All incomes have been adjusting for inflation and are presented in 2023-inflation-adjusted dollars.

    Age groups classifications include:

    • Under 25 years
    • 25 to 44 years
    • 45 to 64 years
    • 65 years and over

    Variables / Data Columns

    • Age Of The Head Of Household: This column presents the age of the head of household
    • Median Household Income: Median household income, in 2023 inflation-adjusted dollars for the specific age group

    Good to know

    Margin of Error

    Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.

    Custom data

    If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.

    Inspiration

    Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.

    Recommended for further research

    This dataset is a part of the main dataset for President township median household income by age. You can refer the same here

  17. H

    Replication data for: A Two-Level Theory of Presidential Instability

    • dataverse.harvard.edu
    Updated Jan 28, 2014
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Anibal Perez-Linan (2014). Replication data for: A Two-Level Theory of Presidential Instability [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/24529
    Explore at:
    CroissantCroissant is a format for machine-learning datasets. Learn more about this at mlcommons.org/croissant.
    Dataset updated
    Jan 28, 2014
    Dataset provided by
    Harvard Dataverse
    Authors
    Anibal Perez-Linan
    License

    CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Time period covered
    1980 - 2007
    Area covered
    Latin America
    Description

    Data for 532 administration-years, corresponding to 116 presidents in 18 Latin American countries between 1980 (or the year of the transition to democracy) and 2007. Variables include a dummy indicating an interruption of the president's tenure in any given year, five dichotomous indicators capturing the social composition of popular protests (if any: workers , state employees, rural poor, urban poor, and middle class), the size of the president's party in congress, party factionalism, per capita income, growth, inflation, media scandals, and military uprisings.

  18. N

    President Township, Pennsylvania annual median income by work experience and...

    • neilsberg.com
    csv, json
    Updated Feb 27, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Neilsberg Research (2025). President Township, Pennsylvania annual median income by work experience and sex dataset: Aged 15+, 2010-2023 (in 2023 inflation-adjusted dollars) // 2025 Edition [Dataset]. https://www.neilsberg.com/insights/president-township-pa-income-by-gender/
    Explore at:
    json, csvAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Feb 27, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Neilsberg Research
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    President Township, Pennsylvania
    Variables measured
    Income for Male Population, Income for Female Population, Income for Male Population working full time, Income for Male Population working part time, Income for Female Population working full time, Income for Female Population working part time
    Measurement technique
    The data presented in this dataset is derived from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 5-Year Estimates. The dataset covers the years 2010 to 2023, representing 14 years of data. To analyze income differences between genders (male and female), we conducted an initial data analysis and categorization. Subsequently, we adjusted these figures for inflation using the Consumer Price Index retroactive series (R-CPI-U-RS) based on current methodologies. For additional information about these estimations, please contact us via email at research@neilsberg.com
    Dataset funded by
    Neilsberg Research
    Description
    About this dataset

    Context

    The dataset presents median income data over a decade or more for males and females categorized by Total, Full-Time Year-Round (FT), and Part-Time (PT) employment in President township. It showcases annual income, providing insights into gender-specific income distributions and the disparities between full-time and part-time work. The dataset can be utilized to gain insights into gender-based pay disparity trends and explore the variations in income for male and female individuals.

    Key observations: Insights from 2023

    Based on our analysis ACS 2019-2023 5-Year Estimates, we present the following observations: - All workers, aged 15 years and older: In President township, the median income for all workers aged 15 years and older, regardless of work hours, was $33,250 for males and $23,676 for females.

    These income figures indicate a substantial gender-based pay disparity, showcasing a gap of approximately 29% between the median incomes of males and females in President township. With women, regardless of work hours, earning 71 cents to each dollar earned by men, this income disparity reveals a concerning trend toward wage inequality that demands attention in thetownship of President township.

    - Full-time workers, aged 15 years and older: In President township, among full-time, year-round workers aged 15 years and older, males earned a median income of $61,250, while females earned $53,750, resulting in a 12% gender pay gap among full-time workers. This illustrates that women earn 88 cents for each dollar earned by men in full-time positions. While this gap shows a trend where women are inching closer to wage parity with men, it also exhibits a noticeable income difference for women working full-time in the township of President township.

    Interestingly, when analyzing income across all roles, including non-full-time employment, the gender pay gap percentage was higher for women compared to men. It appears that full-time employment presents a more favorable income scenario for women compared to other employment patterns in President township.

    Content

    When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2019-2023 5-Year Estimates. All incomes have been adjusting for inflation and are presented in 2023-inflation-adjusted dollars.

    Gender classifications include:

    • Male
    • Female

    Employment type classifications include:

    • Full-time, year-round: A full-time, year-round worker is a person who worked full time (35 or more hours per week) and 50 or more weeks during the previous calendar year.
    • Part-time: A part-time worker is a person who worked less than 35 hours per week during the previous calendar year.

    Variables / Data Columns

    • Year: This column presents the data year. Expected values are 2010 to 2023
    • Male Total Income: Annual median income, for males regardless of work hours
    • Male FT Income: Annual median income, for males working full time, year-round
    • Male PT Income: Annual median income, for males working part time
    • Female Total Income: Annual median income, for females regardless of work hours
    • Female FT Income: Annual median income, for females working full time, year-round
    • Female PT Income: Annual median income, for females working part time

    Good to know

    Margin of Error

    Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.

    Custom data

    If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.

    Inspiration

    Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.

    Recommended for further research

    This dataset is a part of the main dataset for President township median household income by race. You can refer the same here

  19. Volcker Shock: federal funds, unemployment and inflation rates 1979-1987

    • statista.com
    Updated Sep 2, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2024). Volcker Shock: federal funds, unemployment and inflation rates 1979-1987 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1338105/volcker-shock-interest-rates-unemployment-inflation/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Sep 2, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    1979 - 1987
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    The Volcker Shock was a period of historically high interest rates precipitated by Federal Reserve Chairperson Paul Volcker's decision to raise the central bank's key interest rate, the Fed funds effective rate, during the first three years of his term. Volcker was appointed chairperson of the Fed in August 1979 by President Jimmy Carter, as replacement for William Miller, who Carter had made his treasury secretary. Volcker was one of the most hawkish (supportive of tighter monetary policy to stem inflation) members of the Federal Reserve's committee, and quickly set about changing the course of monetary policy in the U.S. in order to quell inflation. The Volcker Shock is remembered for bringing an end to over a decade of high inflation in the United States, prompting a deep recession and high unemployment, and for spurring on debt defaults among developing countries in Latin America who had borrowed in U.S. dollars.

    Monetary tightening and the recessions of the early '80s

    Beginning in October 1979, Volcker's Fed tightened monetary policy by raising interest rates. This decision had the effect of depressing demand and slowing down the U.S. economy, as credit became more expensive for households and businesses. The Fed funds rate, the key overnight rate at which banks lend their excess reserves to each other, rose as high as 17.6 percent in early 1980. The rate was allowed to fall back below 10 percent following this first peak, however, due to worries that inflation was not falling fast enough, a second cycle of monetary tightening was embarked upon starting in August of 1980. The rate would reach its all-time peak in June of 1981, at 19.1 percent. The second recession sparked by these hikes was far deeper than the 1980 recession, with unemployment peaking at 10.8 percent in December 1980, the highest level since The Great Depression. This recession would drive inflation to a low point during Volcker's terms of 2.5 percent in August 1983.

    The legacy of the Volcker Shock

    By the end of Volcker's terms as Fed Chair, inflation was at a manageable rate of around four percent, while unemployment had fallen under six percent, as the economy grew and business confidence returned. While supporters of Volcker's actions point to these numbers as proof of the efficacy of his actions, critics have claimed that there were less harmful ways that inflation could have been brought under control. The recessions of the early 1980s are cited as accelerating deindustrialization in the U.S., as manufacturing jobs lost in 'rust belt' states such as Michigan, Ohio, and Pennsylvania never returned during the years of recovery. The Volcker Shock was also a driving factor behind the Latin American debt crises of the 1980s, as governments in the region defaulted on debts which they had incurred in U.S. dollars. Debates about the validity of using interest rate hikes to get inflation under control have recently re-emerged due to the inflationary pressures facing the U.S. following the Coronavirus pandemic and the Federal Reserve's subsequent decision to embark on a course of monetary tightening.

  20. U

    Harris 1972 Presidential Election and Economic Outlook Survey, study no....

    • dataverse-staging.rdmc.unc.edu
    • dataverse.unc.edu
    Updated May 2, 2008
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    UNC Dataverse (2008). Harris 1972 Presidential Election and Economic Outlook Survey, study no. 2235 [Dataset]. https://dataverse-staging.rdmc.unc.edu/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=hdl:1902.29/H-2235
    Explore at:
    application/x-sas-transport(3629040), tsv(901613), pdf(1151938), bin(1514880), text/x-sas-syntax(88386), application/x-spss-por(931356)Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 2, 2008
    Dataset provided by
    UNC Dataverse
    License

    https://dataverse-staging.rdmc.unc.edu/api/datasets/:persistentId/versions/1.0/customlicense?persistentId=hdl:1902.29/H-2235https://dataverse-staging.rdmc.unc.edu/api/datasets/:persistentId/versions/1.0/customlicense?persistentId=hdl:1902.29/H-2235

    Description

    Pre-election survey investigates reasons for preferences for Richard Nixon or George McGovern for president.Additional questions focus on the economy, inflation, recession, unemployment, Wage-Price Control Board, break-in at Democratic National Headquarters, and legitimacy of wiretapping.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Statista (2024). Opinion of U.S. adults on Biden's responsibility for inflation rate 2022 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1307099/biden-perceived-responsibility-inflation-rate-us/
Organization logo

Opinion of U.S. adults on Biden's responsibility for inflation rate 2022

Explore at:
Dataset updated
Aug 12, 2024
Dataset authored and provided by
Statistahttp://statista.com/
Time period covered
Jul 9, 2022 - Jul 11, 2022
Area covered
United States
Description

According to a survey conducted between July 9 and July 11, 2022, 45 percent of Americans thought that Joe Biden was highly responsible for the current trend in the inflation rate. This is compared to 26 percent of Americans who said President Biden did not have a lot of responsibility for the current inflation rate.

Inflation in the U.S. Global events in 2022 had a significant impact on the United States. Inflation rose from 1.4 percent in January 2021 to 9.1 percent in June 2022. Significantly higher prices of basic goods led to increased concern over the state of the economy, and the ability to cover increasing monthly costs with the same income. Low interest rates, COVID-19-related supply constraints, corporate profiteering, and strong consumer spending had already put pressure on prices before Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. Despite rising wages on paper, the rapid growth of consumer prices resulted in an overall decline in real hourly earnings in the first half of 2022.

How much control does Joe Biden have over inflation? The bulk of economic performance and the inflation rate is determined by factors outside the President’s direct control, but U.S. presidents are often held accountable for it. Some of those factors are market forces, private business, productivity growth, the state of the global economy, and policies of the Federal Reserve. Although high-spending decisions such as the 2021 COVID-19 relief bill may have contributed to rising inflation rates, the bill has been seen by economists as a necessary intervention for preventing a recession at the time, as well as being of significant importance to low-income workers impacted by the pandemic.

The most important tool for curbing inflation and controlling the U.S. economy is the Federal Reserve. The Reserve has the ability to set, raise, and lower interest rates and determine the wider monetary policy for the United States – something out of the president’s control. In June 2022, the Reserve announced it would raise interest rates 0.75 percent for the second time that year – hoisting the rate to a target range of 2.25 to 2.5 percent – in an attempt to slow consumer demand and balance demand with supply. However, it can often take time before the impacts of interventions by the Federal Reserve are seen in the public’s day-to-day lives. Most economists expect this wave of inflation to pass in a year to 18 months.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu