Over 660 Talk London users took part in the GLA's online health survey during March 2014. This explored people’s experiences of health services, views on health policies and health behaviours. An identical telephone poll with 1000 Londoners also ran between 14 and 16 March. The results will be used by the Mayor’s Health Team and the London Health Commission to inform their recommendations on improving health in London. The infographics summarise the key findings. - - - -

In November 2014, 3,674 Londoners took part in the first London Survey run by Talk London, to tell us what they thought of the city and their neighbourhood. The London Survey enables us to: • Assess Londoners’ priorities across the breadth of Mayoral responsibilities • Understand Londoners’ perceptions of their quality of life • Identify those areas that require improvement, or where we need to improve outcomes for particular groups of people. TECHNICAL DETAILS • Results are based on interviews with 3,674 London residents aged 18+. • Interviews were carried out online via the Talk London community between 3 Oct and 5 Nov. • Interviews were not randomly sampled, but self-selecting via a number of known databases. This achieved a non-representative sample of Londoners. • The data has been weighted by age, gender and ethnicity to reflect that of the London population. • A minimum number of responses were achieved for each key demographic group to maintain a robust sample. • Where results do not sum to 100% this may be due to multiple responses, computer rounding or the exclusion of don’t knows/not stated. • The qualitative analysis of the open-ended questions 36, 37 and 38 was undertaken by SPA Future Thinking. Top level themes and sub themes are reported as a percentage of the overall base number of respondents (3,421 to all three questions). The top three sub themes are presented where available. • This is the first London Survey conducted by Talk London for City Hall. INFOGRAPHICS

2011 Census Infographics

Throughout 2012/13 the GLA carried out a programme of research to explore the impact that the London 2012 Games and the work of the GLA has had on the opinions, behaviour and attitudes of Londoners and visitors to London.

This page is where you can find the results from all of the GLA’s Gamestime research.

Infographics
There are a series of infographics that show the key findings of the London 2012 Gamestime research.

1) To assess any changes in Londoners awareness, perceptions, attitudes and behaviour as a result of the Games.

Research carried out by: TNS London Bus on behalf of the GLA

Method: Four online surveys before during and after the Games

Date of research: 10th – 15th May 2012, 16th – 22nd August 2012, 12th -16th October 2012, 14th – 20th March 2013

Sample: Representative sample of 1,018 Londoners in May 2012 (1,002 in August 2012 & March 2013 and 1,032 in October 2012) over the age of 16 in the Greater London Area

Results: Online Monitoring (.zip)

2) To assess the impact and success of GLA’s event programme, marketing materials, city decorations, Team London Ambassadors and explore sentiment, changes in behaviour and perceptions of the Games legacy on London.

Research carried out by: ICM Research on behalf of the GLA

Method: Face to face research at 10 separate events organised or supported by the Mayor of London during the Olympic and Paralympic Games

Date of research: 31st July – 10th September 2012

Sample: 3,102 people who attended Olympic and Paralympics related events during the Games

Results: Event Research (.zip)

3) To explore Londoners and visitors experiences of London during the Games and the impact this has had on both their perceptions of London and their behaviour.

Research carried out by: GLA Intelligence Unit

Method: Online survey

Date of research: 17th December 2012 –20th January 2013

Sample: 1,230 people who attended events during the Summer and / or are signed up to the Mayor of London presents database

Results: Post Games Online Survey (.zip)

4) To explore the views and experiences of those who volunteered as a Team London Ambassador and see what impact this experience may have had/ have in the future.

Research carried out by: GLA Intelligence Unit

Method: Online survey

Date of research: September 2012

Sample: 2,619 Team London Ambassadors

Results: Team London Ambassador Volunteer Feedback Survey (.zip)

5) To explore the views and experiences of those who engaged with the Team London Ambassadors during their time in London.

Research carried out by: GLA Intelligence Unit

Method: Online survey

Date of research: July – September 2012

Sample: 233 people who spoke to Ambassadors

Results: Team London Ambassador Visitor Feedback Survey (.zip)

6) To understand how people talk about London as a place to live work and visit from a natural perspective and assess how this may have changed as a result of the Games.

Research carried out by: GLA Intelligence Unit

Method: Online survey

Date of research: April – June 2012, Sept – Dec 2012

Sample: Random sample of 14,000 social media comments, 7,000 between April – June 2012 and 7,000 between Sept – Dec 2012. Resulting in a total sample of 3,098 relevant comments, 1,549 between April – June 2012 and 1,549 between Sept - Dec 2012

Results: Social Media Analysis (.zip)

This infographic gives an overview of the burden of social isolation and loneliness in Camden

DATA The results for the Mayoral and Assembly elections down to constituency level are available (including turnout and spoils etc). The full 2012 election results for Mayor and Assembly for: - Wards, Boroughs and Constituencies (includes postal votes data, turnout figures, and first by second Mayoral vote matrices) - Constituencies only (includes percentages) MAPPING The 2000-2012 election data for wards, boroughs, and constituencies in summary format is presented using interactive maps and charts in an InstantAtlas report. - if you have a browser that supports HTML5 check out our Instant Atlas report of the report (Firefox, Chrome, Safari or IE9 support this). This data for all three levels of geography is presented in these reports. This includes interactive map, table, bar chart, and trend chart. SUMMARY The election results in summary format for 2000 to 2012 for: Constituencies only Wards, Boroughs and Constituencies Note: In a few instances the electorate figure has been revised since the initial declared result. This has led to a small change in some turnout figures. The spreadsheets above all contain the correct revised figures. The spreadsheet contains a summary of all the London elections results since 2000. This includes Mayoral, Assembly list and Constituency member election results. In the 2000 election, only data for constituencies was collected, so no borough or ward breakdowns are available for that year. Data shown includes: - the winner in each area (the candidate or party with most votes). This does not include second preference votes in the Mayoral election, - the winning majority (the highest number of votes minus the second highest number of votes), - the percentage turnout figure. (note for wards this is indicative only since all postal votes are registered to borough level only), and - the percentage of votes for each of the major parties. Note that only parties with at least 5 per cent of the vote across London in at least one year of elections are shown. All other parties are aggregated into 'Other'. INFOGRAPHIC The GLA Intelligence Unit has produced this infographic below (London Election Results By Numbers), presenting the key facts from these elections. Access further detail and reports for all elections from the Elections page. Or visit the London Elects website

The results for the Mayoral and Assembly elections down to constituency level are available (including turnout and spoils etc).

Note: In a few instances the electorate figure has been revised since the initial declared result. This has led to a small change in some turnout figures. The spreadsheets above all contain the correct revised figures.

The spreadsheet contains a summary of all the London elections results since 2000. This includes Mayoral, Assembly list and Constituency member election results. In the 2000 election, only data for constituencies was collected, so no borough or ward breakdowns are available for that year.

Data shown includes:

• the winner in each area (the candidate or party with most votes). This does not include second preference votes in the Mayoral election,
• the winning majority (the highest number of votes minus the second highest number of votes),
• the percentage turnout figure. (note for wards this is indicative only since all postal votes are registered to borough level only), and
• the percentage of votes for each of the major parties. Note that only parties with at least 5 per cent of the vote across London in at least one year of elections are shown. All other parties are aggregated into 'Other'.

INFOGRAPHIC

The GLA Intelligence Unit has produced this infographic below (London Election Results By Numbers), presenting the key facts from these elections.

https://cdn.datapress.cloud/london/img/dataset/9c111b77-13eb-4257-908d-aef103615078/_import/Infographic-final-small.jpg" alt="Election 2012 Results" />

Access further detail and reports for all elections from the Elections page.

Or visit the London Elects website

In this project, we aimed to map the visualisation design space of visualisation embedded in right-to-left (RTL) scripts. We aimed to expand our knowledge of visualisation design beyond the dominance of research based on left-to-right (LTR) scripts. Through this project, we identify common design practices regarding the chart structure, the text, and the source. We also identify ambiguity, particularly regarding the axis position and direction, suggesting that the community may benefit from unified standards similar to those found on web design for RTL scripts. To achieve this goal, we curated a dataset that covered 128 visualisations found in Arabic news media and coded these visualisations based on the chart composition (e.g., chart type, x-axis direction, y-axis position, legend position, interaction, embellishment type), text (e.g., availability of text, availability of caption, annotation type), and source (source position, attribution to designer, ownership of the visualisation design). Links are also provided to the articles and the visualisations. This dataset is limited for stand-alone visualisations, whether they were single-panelled or included small multiples. We also did not consider infographics in this project, nor any visualisation that did not have an identifiable chart type (e.g., bar chart, line chart). The attached documents also include some graphs from our analysis of the dataset provided, where we illustrate common design patterns and their popularity within our sample.

Over 660 Talk London brugere deltog i GLA's online helbredsundersøgelse i marts 2014. Her blev folks erfaringer med sundhedstjenester, holdninger til sundhedspolitikker og sundhedsadfærd undersøgt. En identisk telefonafstemning med 1000 londonere fandt også sted mellem den 14. og 16. marts. Resultaterne vil blive brugt af borgmesterens sundhedsteam og London Health Commission til at informere om deres anbefalinger om forbedring af sundheden i London. Infografikken opsummerer de vigtigste resultater.

-

https://londondatastore-upload.s3.amazonaws.com/Experience-of-health-services-GLA-Health-Poll-2014-small.png" alt="">

-

https://londondatastore-upload.s3.amazonaws.com/Shaping-health-policy-GLA-Health-Poll-2014-small.png" alt="">

-

https://londondatastore-upload.s3.amazonaws.com/Healthy-behaviours-GLA-Health-Poll-2014-small.png" alt="">

-