As of 2024, Sustainalytics was the third most popular source for Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) data among institutional investors. Bloomberg ranked second, with ** percent of survey respondents stating they used this source for ESG data. MSCI was the leading source among institutional investors surveyed, with ** percent of investors having a preference for this source.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This table covers investments of institutional investors with a breakdown by type of investment. It enables analysing on a quarterly basis shifts over time in the investment portfolio of institutional investors. This is possible for the total of institutional investors, and for each of the three groups: pension funds, insurance corporations and non-MMF investment funds.
Data available yearly figures from 1996 to 2017, quarterly figures from 2005 to 2017.
Status of the figures: Figures up to 2015 are definitive, figures as from 2016 are provisional. Because this table is discontinued, figures will not be updated anymore.
Changes as of 7 September 2018: None, this table is discontinued.
When will new figures be published? Not applicable anymore. The strategic alliance between Statistics Netherlands (CBS) and the Dutch Central Bank (DNB) has led to a reallocation of tasks between the two institutions. Institutional investors is now part of the dominion of DNB. Publication of tables on institutional investors by the CBS is discontinued. DNB provides the OECD with figures for its statistic Institutional investors. See paragraph 3 for links to the websites of DNB and OECD.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This table consists of the balance sheet of institutional investors. It enables analyzing shifts in the balance sheet of institutional investors. This is possible for the total of institutional investors, and for each of the three groups: pension funds, insurance corporations and investment funds. Data available from 1998 to 2012. Status of the figures: The figures in this table are up to 2010 definitive, figures for 2011 are revised provisional figures and figures for 2012 are provisional. Because this table is discontinued, figures will not be updated anymore. Changes as of 5 February 2015: None, this table is discontinued. When will new figures be published? Not applicable anymore. This table is replaced by table Institutional investors; balance sheet. See paragraph 3.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
China Number of Institutional Investor Account: A Share: New: QFII data was reported at 10.000 Unit in Dec 2016. This records a decrease from the previous number of 18.000 Unit for Nov 2016. China Number of Institutional Investor Account: A Share: New: QFII data is updated monthly, averaging 12.500 Unit from Jan 2011 (Median) to Dec 2016, with 72 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 45.000 Unit in Dec 2013 and a record low of 0.000 Unit in Dec 2011. China Number of Institutional Investor Account: A Share: New: QFII data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by China Securities Depository and Clearing Corporation Limited. The data is categorized under China Premium Database’s Financial Market – Table CN.ZA: China Securities Depository and Clearing: No of Investor Account.
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/
License information was derived automatically
This broad and novel database of 52 countries over 2001–11, allowed a study that assesses the link between financial intermediation and saving. The study finds that the Latin American and Caribbean (LAC) region lags well behind other regions in terms of financial depth, as measured by gross private domestic financial assets. LAC countries also have a larger share of bank deposits and cash in the private sector portfolio, compared to non-bank assets (bonds and shares). Moreover, within the institutional investor industry, pension funds are relatively developed in the region, although they grew out of the compulsory pension systems in several countries that date back to the 1980s and 1990s. The findings also indicate that LAC countries have about 40 percent of gross private financial wealth invested abroad, but just 4 percent of gross private liabilities have that origin, which attests to region’s obstacles in tapping international markets. The countries in general present a small share of household and business saving being intermediated through the financial system. In the specific case of bank deposits, just 5 percent of household saving and 3 percent of business saving are kept in the banking system.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This table consists of changes in the investments of institutional investors in property. It shows which part of the changes is due to purchases and sales, and which part is due to revaluations. Particularly for revaluations it is worth noting that they are based on reports of the investors. Data available yearly figures from 1999 to 2017, quarterly figures from 2003 to 2017. Status of the figures: Figures up to 2015 are definitive, figures as from 2016 are provisional. Because this table is discontinued, figures will not be updated anymore. Changes as of 7 September 2018: None, this table is discontinued. When will new figures be published? Not applicable anymore. The strategic alliance between Statistics Netherlands (CBS) and the Dutch Central Bank (DNB) has led to a reallocation of tasks between the two institutions. Institutional investors is now part of the dominion of DNB. Publication of tables on institutional investors by the CBS is discontinued. DNB provides the OECD with figures for its statistic Institutional investors. See paragraph 3 for links to the websites of DNB and OECD.
This statistic displays the number of institutional investors of alternative assets in Europe as of 2018, by country. The United Kingdom (UK) topped the list for institutional investors with *** as of 2018. Switzerland and Germany finished the top three European countries for number of institutional investors of alternative assets with *** and *** respectively.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
China Number of Institutional Investor Account: A Share: New: Trust data was reported at 1,234.000 Unit in Dec 2016. This records an increase from the previous number of 707.000 Unit for Nov 2016. China Number of Institutional Investor Account: A Share: New: Trust data is updated monthly, averaging 181.000 Unit from Jan 2011 (Median) to Dec 2016, with 72 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 1,977.000 Unit in Jun 2015 and a record low of 0.000 Unit in May 2012. China Number of Institutional Investor Account: A Share: New: Trust data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by China Securities Depository and Clearing Corporation Limited. The data is categorized under China Premium Database’s Financial Market – Table CN.ZA: China Securities Depository and Clearing: No of Investor Account.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This table covers investments of institutional investors from 1950 onwards. It enables analyzing shifts over time in the investment portfolio of institutional investors. This is possible for the total of institutional investors, and for each of the three groups: pension funds, insurance corporations and investment funds.
Data available from 1950 to 2012.
Status of the figures: The figures in this table are up to 2010 definitive, figures for 2011 are revised provisional figures and figures for 2012 are provisional. Because this table is discontinued, figures will not be updated anymore.
Changes as of 18 December 2014: None, this table is discontinued.
When will new figures be published? Not applicable anymore. This table is replaced by table Institutional investors; short-term and long-term investments. See paragraph 3.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This table covers investments of institutional investors in property. It shows that institutional investors nowadays invest more indirectly in property by taking interests in investment funds that invest in property. Furthermore it enables analyses whether there is more or less invested in different types of direct property such as residential buildings.
Data available yearly figures from 1980 to 2016.
Status of the figures: Figures up to 2015 are definitive, figures for 2016 are provisional. Because this table is discontinued, figures will not be updated anymore.
Changes as of 7 September 2018: None, this table is discontinued.
When will new figures be published? Not applicable anymore. The strategic alliance between Statistics Netherlands (CBS) and the Dutch Central Bank (DNB) has led to a reallocation of tasks between the two institutions. Institutional investors is now part of the dominion of DNB. Publication of tables on institutional investors by the CBS is discontinued. DNB provides the OECD with figures for its statistic Institutional investors. See paragraph 3 for links to the websites of DNB and OECD.
Abstract copyright UK Data Service and data collection copyright owner.
In 2024, the leading concern among institutional investors regarding sustainable investing was data availability and consistency. The share of institutional investors who viewed data availability as a concern was over ** percent. Other significant concerns included fluctuating regulatory guidance on sustainable fund disclosures and classifications, as well as greenwashing by corporations or other investees.
We identify temporal investor networks for Nokia stock by constructing networks from correlations between investor-specific net-volumes and analyze changes in the networks around dot-com bubble. The analysis is conducted separately for households, financial, and non-financial institutions. Our results indicate that spanning tree measures for households reflected the boom and crisis: the maximum spanning tree measures had a clear upward tendency in the bull markets when the bubble was building up, and, even more importantly, the minimum spanning tree measures pre-reacted the burst of the bubble. At the same time, we find less clear reactions in the minimal and maximal spanning trees of non-financial and financial institutions around the bubble, which suggests that household investors can have a greater herding tendency around bubbles.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
ABSTRACT Purpose: This paper analyses the viability of stock trading as a mechanism to promote corporate governance, addressing its effects on abnormal returns, information, and firm performance. Originality/value: The study indicates that competition among institutional investors is important to raise stock price efficiency. Policies that allow capital inflow, increase in liquidity, and a link between managers’ salaries and stock performance are beneficial to reinforce the stock market efficiency. Design/methodology/approach: Hypotheses testing using panel data regressions of 233 stocks between December 2009 to December 2017 from Thomson Eikon, Economatica and ComDinheiro. Findings: The results indicate that the number of institutional investors is not related to abnormal returns. On the other hand, the number of institutional investors increases the amount of firm-specific information into stock prices, rising stock market price efficiency. This relationship is stronger among the preferred stocks (PN), but this mechanism is still not valid to increase firms’ operational performance. Despite the possible increase in stock price efficiency, the investors cannot adopt such a mechanism to exercise governance if there is no remuneration linked to performance.
CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
License information was derived automatically
Daily institutional investment data collated and released by NSE. The data is available separately for Foreign Institutional Investors (FIIs) and Domestic Institutional Investors (DIIs). Period April 2007 to May 2017.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This table covers investments of institutional investors from 1950 onwards. It enables analyzing shifts over time in the investment portfolio of institutional investors. This is possible for the total of institutional investors, and for each of the three groups: pension funds, insurance corporations and investment funds.
Data available yearly figures from 1950 to 2016.
Status of the figures: Figures up to 2015 are definitive, figures for 2016 are provisional. Because this table is discontinued, figures will not be updated anymore.
Changes as of 7 September 2018: None, this table is discontinued.
When will new figures be published? Not applicable anymore. The strategic alliance between Statistics Netherlands (CBS) and the Dutch Central Bank (DNB) has led to a reallocation of tasks between the two institutions. Institutional investors is now part of the dominion of DNB. Publication of tables on institutional investors by the CBS is discontinued. DNB provides the OECD with figures for its statistic Institutional investors. See paragraph 3 for links to the websites of DNB and OECD.
CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
License information was derived automatically
The replication package includes a Stata DO file and data files to replicate results reported in the article "Do Institutional Investors Process and Act Upon Information? Evidence from M&A Targets", forthcoming in the Review of Corporate Finance Studies.
https://www.datainsightsmarket.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.datainsightsmarket.com/privacy-policy
The alternative investment platform market is experiencing robust growth, driven by increasing demand for sophisticated investment management tools and the rising adoption of digital technologies within the financial services sector. The market, currently valued at approximately $15 billion in 2025, is projected to witness a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 15% between 2025 and 2033, reaching an estimated $50 billion by 2033. This expansion is fueled by several key factors: the growing preference for cloud-based solutions offering scalability and cost-effectiveness, the increasing need for enhanced data analytics and reporting capabilities to support informed decision-making, and the rising adoption of alternative investment strategies by institutional and high-net-worth investors. The BFSI (Banking, Financial Services, and Insurance) sector is a major driver of market growth, followed by the IT and Telecommunications sectors, which are increasingly adopting these platforms for managing their own investments and streamlining internal processes. Regulatory changes promoting transparency and efficiency in alternative investments further contribute to market expansion. While the market presents significant opportunities, challenges remain. Security concerns related to data management and platform integrity are paramount. The need for integration with legacy systems and the complexities involved in implementing these platforms across diverse organizational structures can also hinder growth. Despite these restraints, the long-term outlook remains positive, with the market poised to benefit from technological advancements in artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning (ML), and blockchain technologies, which further enhance the capabilities of these platforms. The competitive landscape is fragmented, with a mix of established players and emerging startups vying for market share. This dynamic environment fosters innovation and competition, ultimately benefiting investors and end-users.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This dataset encompasses empirical data on the Qualified Foreign Institutional Investors(QFII) on corporate ESG performance (ESG) across A-share listed companies in Shanghai and Shenzhen from 2009 to 2022 as the research sample.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
India Foreign Institutional Investor Investments: USD: Net: Equity data was reported at 671.420 USD mn in 16 May 2025. This records an increase from the previous number of 109.090 USD mn for 15 May 2025. India Foreign Institutional Investor Investments: USD: Net: Equity data is updated daily, averaging 26.605 USD mn from Jan 1999 (Median) to 16 May 2025, with 6430 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 2.600 USD bn in 22 Apr 2015 and a record low of -1.847 USD bn in 04 Oct 2024. India Foreign Institutional Investor Investments: USD: Net: Equity data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by National Securities Depository Limited. The data is categorized under High Frequency Database’s Financial and Futures Market – Table IN.ZA018: Foreign Portfolio Investors (FPI) Investment. The data is compiled on the basis of reports submitted to SEBI by custodians on the reporting date on FII Investment of the previous trading day [COVID-19-IMPACT]
As of 2024, Sustainalytics was the third most popular source for Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) data among institutional investors. Bloomberg ranked second, with ** percent of survey respondents stating they used this source for ESG data. MSCI was the leading source among institutional investors surveyed, with ** percent of investors having a preference for this source.