Brazil Foreign Capital Census: (FDI) Foreign Direct Investment: Equity Capital: Number of Companies: Services: Insurance, Reinsurance, Complementary Social Security & Health Assistance data was reported at 76.000 Unit in 2015. This records a decrease from the previous number of 94.000 Unit for 2010. Brazil Foreign Capital Census: (FDI) Foreign Direct Investment: Equity Capital: Number of Companies: Services: Insurance, Reinsurance, Complementary Social Security & Health Assistance data is updated yearly, averaging 85.000 Unit from Dec 2010 (Median) to 2015, with 2 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 94.000 Unit in 2010 and a record low of 76.000 Unit in 2015. Brazil Foreign Capital Census: (FDI) Foreign Direct Investment: Equity Capital: Number of Companies: Services: Insurance, Reinsurance, Complementary Social Security & Health Assistance data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Central Bank of Brazil. The data is categorized under Brazil Premium Database’s Investment – Table BR.OC007: Foreign Capital Census: FDI: Equity Capital: Number of Companies: by Economic Activity Sector.

Saudi Arabia Number of Social Insurance Establishments: Financial, Insurance, Real Estate & Business Services data was reported at 1,387.000 Unit in 2016. This records an increase from the previous number of 1,352.000 Unit for 2015. Saudi Arabia Number of Social Insurance Establishments: Financial, Insurance, Real Estate & Business Services data is updated yearly, averaging 1,285.000 Unit from Dec 1994 (Median) to 2016, with 23 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 20,197.000 Unit in 2011 and a record low of 701.000 Unit in 2000. Saudi Arabia Number of Social Insurance Establishments: Financial, Insurance, Real Estate & Business Services data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by General Organization for Social Insurance. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Saudi Arabia – Table SA.O006: Number of Social Insurance Establishments: by Industry.

This survey charted Finnish citizens' as well as social and healthcare service professionals' attitudes and views concerning secondary use of health and social care data in research and development of services. The study contained two target groups: (1) persons who suffered or had a close relative or acquaintance who suffered from one or more chronic conditions, diseases or disorders, and (2) social and healthcare service professionals. First, the respondents' opinions on the reliability of a variety of authorities and organisations were examined (e.g. the police, Kela, register and statistics authorities, universities) as well as trust in appropriate handling of personal data. They were also asked which type of information they deemed personal or not (e.g. bank account number and balance, purchase history at a grocery store, web browsing history, patient records, genetic information, social security number, phone number). They were asked to evaluate which principles they considered important in handling personal health data (e.g. being able to access one's personal data and to have inaccurate data rectified, and being able to restrict data processing), and the study also surveyed how interested the respondents were in keeping track of the use of their health data, and how willing they would be to permit the use of anonymous health data and genetic information for a variety of purposes (e.g. medicine and treatment development, development of equipment and services, and operations of insurance companies). Next, it was examined whether the respondents kept track of their physical activity with a smartphone or a fitness tracker, for instance, and if they would be willing to permit the use of anonymous data concerning physical activity for a variety of purposes. In addition, the respondents' attitudes were charted with regard to developing medicine research by combining anonymous health data and patient records with other data on, for instance, physical activity, alcohol use, grocery store purchase history, web browsing history, and social media use. The study also examined the willingness to permit access to personal health data for social and healthcare service professionals in a service situation, as well as for social and healthcare authorities and other authorities outside of a service situation. Finally, it was charted how important the respondents deemed different factors relating to data collection (e.g. being able to decide for which purposes personal data, or even anonymous data, can be used, and increasing awareness on how health data can be utilised in scientific research). The reliability of a variety of authorities and organisations, such as social welfare/healthcare organisations, academic researchers and pharmaceutical companies, was also examined in terms of data security and purposes for using data. Background variables included, among others, mother tongue, marital status, household composition, housing tenure, socioeconomic class, political party preference, left-right political self-placement, gross income, economic activity and occupational status, and respondent group (citizen/healthcare service professional/social service professional).

Foreign Capital Census: FDI: Equity Capital: Number of Companies: Services: Insurance, Reinsurance, Complementary Social Security & Health Assistance在2015达76.000 单位，相较于2010的94.000 单位有所下降。Foreign Capital Census: FDI: Equity Capital: Number of Companies: Services: Insurance, Reinsurance, Complementary Social Security & Health Assistance数据按每年更新，2010至2015期间平均值为85.000 单位，共2份观测结果。该数据的历史最高值出现于2010，达94.000 单位，而历史最低值则出现于2015，为76.000 单位。CEIC提供的Foreign Capital Census: FDI: Equity Capital: Number of Companies: Services: Insurance, Reinsurance, Complementary Social Security & Health Assistance数据处于定期更新的状态，数据来源于Central Bank of Brazil，数据归类于Brazil Premium Database的Investment – Table BR.OC007: Foreign Capital Census: FDI: Equity Capital: Number of Companies: by Economic Activity Sector。