In 2023, Singapore dominated the ranking of the world's health and health systems, followed by Japan and South Korea. The health index score is calculated by evaluating various indicators that assess the health of the population, and access to the services required to sustain good health, including health outcomes, health systems, sickness and risk factors, and mortality rates. The health and health system index score of the top ten countries with the best healthcare system in the world ranged between 82 and 86.9, measured on a scale of zero to 100.

Global Health Security Index  Numerous health and health system indexes have been developed to assess various attributes and aspects of a nation's healthcare system. One such measure is the Global Health Security (GHS) index. This index evaluates the ability of 195 nations to identify, assess, and mitigate biological hazards in addition to political and socioeconomic concerns, the quality of their healthcare systems, and their compliance with international finance and standards. In 2021, the United States was ranked at the top of the GHS index, but due to multiple reasons, the U.S. government failed to effectively manage the COVID-19 pandemic. The GHS Index evaluates capability and identifies preparation gaps; nevertheless, it cannot predict a nation's resource allocation in case of a public health emergency.

Universal Health Coverage Index  Another health index that is used globally by the members of the United Nations (UN) is the universal health care (UHC) service coverage index. The UHC index monitors the country's progress related to the sustainable developmental goal (SDG) number three. The UHC service coverage index tracks 14 indicators related to reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health, infectious diseases, non-communicable diseases, service capacity, and access to care. The main target of universal health coverage is to ensure that no one is denied access to essential medical services due to financial hardships. In 2021, the UHC index scores ranged from as low as 21 to a high score of 91 across 194 countries. 

This dataset provides key performance indicators (KPIs) for healthcare systems across various countries or regions. It includes metrics such as hospital capacity, patient satisfaction, healthcare expenditures, mortality rates, life expectancy, and doctor-to-patient ratios.

The dataset is valuable for researchers, policymakers, and data analysts seeking insights into healthcare efficiency, access, and outcomes. It can be used for comparative analysis, healthcare policy evaluation, predictive modeling, and machine learning applications in the medical field.

Potential Use Cases:

📉 Analyzing healthcare efficiency and resource allocation
🏥 Identifying disparities in healthcare access
📊 Predictive modeling for patient outcomes
💰 Studying the impact of healthcare expenditures on public health
📌 Comparing healthcare systems across countries

In 2023, the health care system in Finland ranked first with a care index score of ****, followed by Belgium and Japan. Care systems index score is measured using multiple indicators from various public databases, it evaluates the capacity of a health system to treat and cure diseases and illnesses, once it is detected in the population This statistic shows the care systems ranking of countries worldwide in 2023, by their index score.

IntroductionPrivate sector healthcare delivery in low- and middle-income countries is sometimes argued to be more efficient, accountable, and sustainable than public sector delivery. Conversely, the public sector is often regarded as providing more equitable and evidence-based care. We performed a systematic review of research studies investigating the performance of private and public sector delivery in low- and middle-income countries. Methods and FindingsPeer-reviewed studies including case studies, meta-analyses, reviews, and case-control analyses, as well as reports published by non-governmental organizations and international agencies, were systematically collected through large database searches, filtered through methodological inclusion criteria, and organized into six World Health Organization health system themes: accessibility and responsiveness; quality; outcomes; accountability, transparency, and regulation; fairness and equity; and efficiency. Of 1,178 potentially relevant unique citations, data were obtained from 102 articles describing studies conducted in low- and middle-income countries. Comparative cohort and cross-sectional studies suggested that providers in the private sector more frequently violated medical standards of practice and had poorer patient outcomes, but had greater reported timeliness and hospitality to patients. Reported efficiency tended to be lower in the private than in the public sector, resulting in part from perverse incentives for unnecessary testing and treatment. Public sector services experienced more limited availability of equipment, medications, and trained healthcare workers. When the definition of “private sector” included unlicensed and uncertified providers such as drug shop owners, most patients appeared to access care in the private sector; however, when unlicensed healthcare providers were excluded from the analysis, the majority of people accessed public sector care. “Competitive dynamics” for funding appeared between the two sectors, such that public funds and personnel were redirected to private sector development, followed by reductions in public sector service budgets and staff. ConclusionsStudies evaluated in this systematic review do not support the claim that the private sector is usually more efficient, accountable, or medically effective than the public sector; however, the public sector appears frequently to lack timeliness and hospitality towards patients. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary

According to a 2021 health care systems ranking among selected high-income countries, the United States came last in the overall ranking of its health care system performance. The overall ranking was based on five performance categories, including access to care, care process, administrative efficiency, equity, and health care outcomes. For the category health care outcomes, which takes into account health outcomes most likely to be responsive to health care, the U.S. was ranked last, while Australia took first place. Outcomes such as infant mortality or preventable mortality were included. This statistic present the health care outcomes rankings of the United States' health care system compared to ten other high-income countries in 2021.

According to the findings of a survey by IPSOS, satisfaction with national health systema varies widely between countries. Respondents from Saudia Arabia and Singapore are the most satisfied with their country's health system. This statistic shows the level of satisfaction with national health systems worldwide as of 2019, by country.

The healthcare ranking reflects the quality of health care and access to health services in different countries. The assessment includes various factors such as life expectancy, access to medical services, healthcare funding, and technologies.

IntroductionThe COVID-19 pandemic disrupted healthcare and societies, exacerbating existing inequalities for women and girls across every sphere. Our study explores health system responses to gender equality goals during the COVID-19 pandemic and inclusion in future policies.MethodsWe apply a qualitative comparative approach, drawing on secondary sources and expert information; the data was collected from March–July 2022. Australia, Brazil, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the USA were selected, reflecting upper-middle and high-income countries with established public health and gender policies but different types of healthcare systems and epidemiological and geo-political conditions. Three sub-goals of SDG5 were analyzed: maternity care/reproductive health, gender-based violence, and gender equality/women's leadership.ResultsWe found similar trends across countries. Pandemic policies strongly cut into women's health, constrained prevention and support services, and weakened reproductive rights, while essential maternity care services were kept open. Intersecting gender inequalities were reinforced, sexual violence increased and women's leadership was weak. All healthcare systems failed to protect women's health and essential public health targets. Yet there were relevant differences in the responses to increased violence and reproductive rights, ranging from some support measures in Australia to an abortion ban in the US.ConclusionsOur study highlights a need for revising pandemic policies through a feminist lens.

Identified Government Efforts towards Improving the Nigerian Healthcare Systems.

There is a growing interest in international comperative health care studies. Much of it is based on the hope that such studies will enable individual systems to improve by learning from the successes and failures of other systems. All such studies must presuppose, however, criteria for evaluating systems. The most widely used criteria are ability to deliver care at resonable cost (efficiency), adequacy of access to care delivered, and quality of care delivered. It is beyond the scope of this paper to develop a complete methodology for international comperative studies, but the project aims to move the process of the development of such a methodology forward. To help this process along, the study compares three health care systems, the Canadian health care system, the Norwegian health care system, and the health care system in the Unites States.

This table shows how health(care) expenditure according to the international definition and health and social care expenditure used by Statistics Netherlands are related. Financing has been chosen as the starting point. Healthcare is delineated according to the international definition of the System of Health Accounts. All healthcare activities count, regardless of whether they take place inside or outside the healthcare sector. Only resident health expenditure counts. Health and social care expenditure covers all care activities, including welfare and childcare, regardless of whether these activities take place as a main or secondary activity. Care can be for residents or non-residents. Care provided in the Netherlands for non-residents (such as tourists) is included in the export of services.

In brief: Health and social care expenditure -/- health-related expenditure, such as domestic care within care for the elderly -/- expenditure on other care and welfare, such as childcare -/- expenditure on education, research and development, other services -/- export, foreign-paid activities = Total current expenditure on health

Data available from: 2021

Status of the figures: The figures for 2024 are provisional. The figures for 2022 and 2023 are revised provisional. The figures for 2021 are final.

Changes as of 8 October 2025: The provisional figures for 2024 have been added. In addition, the figures for 2021–2023 have been partly adjusted, based on the most up-to-date data from various sources, including data from the National Health Care Institute and the CBS business and economic statistics on health care.

When will new figures be published? In spring 2026, the figures for 2022–2024 will be revised. At the end of 2026, provisional figures for 2025 will be published.

Health Care Information System Market Outlook

The global Health Care Information System market size was valued at approximately USD 90 billion in 2023 and is projected to reach USD 190 billion by 2032, growing at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 8.5% during the forecast period. Factors such as the increasing adoption of digital health solutions, rising demand for accurate and timely patient information, and government initiatives promoting the deployment of electronic health records (EHR) are driving this growth.

One of the primary growth drivers for the Health Care Information System market is the increasing adoption of electronic medical records (EMRs) and electronic health records (EHRs). These systems have revolutionized the way patient data is stored, accessed, and analyzed, leading to improved patient outcomes and streamlined healthcare operations. The integration of advanced technologies like AI and machine learning with these systems further enhances their capabilities, enabling predictive analytics and better decision-making in clinical settings.

Another significant factor contributing to market growth is the rising need for efficient healthcare management systems. With an increasing global population and the prevalence of chronic diseases, healthcare providers are under immense pressure to deliver high-quality care while optimizing resources. Health Care Information Systems offer solutions for efficient patient management, billing, scheduling, and resource allocation, thereby enhancing the overall efficiency of healthcare delivery models.

Additionally, governmental policies and incentives aimed at digitizing healthcare infrastructures are playing a crucial role in market expansion. Various governments around the world are implementing regulations and providing financial incentives to encourage the adoption of health care information systems. This regulatory push is particularly strong in regions such as North America and Europe, where governments are focused on improving healthcare quality and patient safety through the use of digital solutions.

From a regional perspective, the Asia Pacific region is expected to witness substantial growth over the forecast period. This growth can be attributed to the rising investments in healthcare infrastructure, increasing awareness about digital health solutions, and the growing focus on improving healthcare services in countries like China and India. Moreover, the region's large population base and the increasing prevalence of lifestyle-related diseases provide a significant market opportunity for health care information systems.

The integration of a Healthcare Decision Support System (HDSS) within health care information systems is becoming increasingly vital. These systems provide clinicians with critical insights derived from patient data, enabling more informed decision-making processes. By leveraging data analytics and evidence-based guidelines, HDSS can assist healthcare providers in diagnosing conditions, selecting appropriate treatments, and managing patient care more effectively. The adoption of HDSS is driven by the need to improve patient outcomes and reduce the incidence of medical errors, which are often attributed to information gaps and cognitive overload among healthcare professionals. As healthcare systems become more complex, the role of decision support systems in ensuring quality care and operational efficiency cannot be overstated.

Component Analysis

The Health Care Information System market can be segmented by components into software, hardware, and services. The software segment is expected to dominate the market due to the increasing adoption of various applications such as EHRs, clinical decision support systems, and practice management software. These software solutions are essential for managing patient data, enhancing clinical workflows, and ensuring compliance with regulatory standards. The rapid advancements in software technologies, including AI and machine learning, are further driving the adoption of health care information systems.

In contrast, the hardware segment, which includes computing devices, storage devices, and networking equipment, plays a crucial role in the deployment and functioning of healthcare information systems. While hardware is essential for the infrastructure, its market share is relatively smaller compared to software due to the higher frequency of software upgrades and updates. However, the d

Suggested Key areas for further Improvement in the Nigerian Healthcare Systems.

The rationale for developing the EU HCCD for use in Health Technology Assessment (HTA) across countries is to provide a common dataset of international costs, which can feed into health economic evaluations carried out by transferring economic evaluation analysis and models across countries. Defining a core dataset of costs for use in HTA across countries enables analyses that try to understand the variation in costs within and across countries (taking into account the differences between the healthcare systems and other factors). Additionally, it makes it easier to carry out multi-country studies and to adapt economic evaluation studies from country to country by saving human resources time (and consequently costs) in the task of looking for healthcare costs.

In 2023, Norway ranked first with a health index score of 83, followed by Iceland and Sweden. The health index score is calculated by evaluating various indicators that assess the health of the population, and access to the services required to sustain good health, including health outcomes, health systems, sickness and risk factors, and mortality rates. The statistic shows the health and health systems ranking of European countries in 2023, by their health index score.

This dataset is compiled from the World Bank Open Data repository and provides a wide range of countrywise health, mortality, and population indicators spanning the years 2000–2025. The aim of creating this dataset is to bring together key global health statistics in a structured format that makes it easier for researchers, policymakers, and students to analyze trends, make comparisons, and draw insights.

The dataset was built to support research in public health, demographics, and sustainable development goals (SDGs). It contains indicators such as immunization coverage, sanitation access, drinking water services, health expenditures, hospital resources, disease incidence, mortality rates, fertility rates, HIV/AIDS data, maternal health, and many more. By providing this data in a single collection, the goal is to help users explore long-term global health patterns, identify disparities between rural and urban populations, and understand how healthcare systems affect life expectancy and mortality over time.

The graph shows the changes in the impact factor of ^ and its corresponding percentile for the sake of comparison with the entire literature. Impact Factor is the most common scientometric index, which is defined by the number of citations of papers in two preceding years divided by the number of papers published in those years.

Healthcare Price Transparency Platforms Market Outlook

According to our latest research, the global healthcare price transparency platforms market size reached USD 1.22 billion in 2024, with a robust compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 18.7% projected through the forecast period. By 2033, the market is anticipated to reach USD 6.22 billion, driven by increasing regulatory mandates, rising consumer demand for price comparison, and the digital transformation of healthcare systems. The primary growth factor underpinning this expansion is the global push for patient empowerment through transparent healthcare pricing, which is reshaping how patients, providers, and payers interact within the healthcare ecosystem.

The surge in adoption of healthcare price transparency platforms is primarily fueled by stringent regulatory requirements in major economies, notably the United States and several European countries. Governments are increasingly mandating hospitals and payers to disclose pricing information, ensuring patients have access to clear, actionable cost data before undergoing medical procedures. This regulatory environment is compelling healthcare organizations to invest in sophisticated software and service solutions that can aggregate, analyze, and present pricing data in user-friendly formats. The growing emphasis on price transparency is also fostering healthy competition among providers, which is anticipated to drive down healthcare costs and improve overall service quality. Furthermore, the proliferation of digital health initiatives and the integration of advanced analytics and artificial intelligence into these platforms are enabling more accurate and personalized cost estimation, further enhancing the value proposition for end-users.

Another significant growth driver is the rising consumer demand for transparency and control over healthcare expenses. Patients are increasingly acting as informed consumers, seeking tools that allow them to compare costs, understand insurance coverage, and anticipate out-of-pocket expenses. This shift is particularly pronounced in regions with high-deductible health plans and growing out-of-pocket healthcare spending. As a result, healthcare price transparency platforms are becoming indispensable for patient engagement and satisfaction. Moreover, these platforms are not only beneficial for patients but also for providers and payers, as they streamline claims management, reduce billing errors, and facilitate compliance with complex regulatory requirements. The integration of real-time data feeds, interoperability with electronic health records (EHR), and mobile accessibility are further enhancing the adoption and effectiveness of these solutions.

The rapid digital transformation of the healthcare sector is also playing a pivotal role in the market’s expansion. The increasing adoption of cloud-based solutions and the shift towards value-based care models are encouraging healthcare organizations to invest in scalable, flexible, and secure price transparency platforms. These platforms enable providers to efficiently manage vast amounts of pricing data, automate compliance processes, and deliver seamless patient experiences. Additionally, the growing prevalence of medical tourism, especially in emerging markets, is driving demand for transparent pricing information to facilitate cross-border healthcare decision-making. The convergence of these factors is expected to sustain the market’s high growth trajectory over the next decade.

From a regional perspective, North America currently dominates the global healthcare price transparency platforms market, accounting for the largest share due to early regulatory adoption, high healthcare expenditure, and a mature digital health ecosystem. However, Asia Pacific is emerging as the fastest-growing region, propelled by increasing healthcare digitization, rising patient awareness, and government initiatives to enhance healthcare affordability and accessibility. Europe also presents significant growth opportunities, particularly in countries with advanced healthcare infrastructure and strong regulatory frameworks supporting transparency. Latin America and the Middle East & Africa are gradually embracing price transparency solutions, driven by the need to improve healthcare efficiency and patient outcomes in resource-constrained environments. Overall, the global market is characterized by dynamic regional trends, with each geography presenting unique growth drivers and challenges.

A 2024 survey found that over half of U.S. individuals indicated the cost of accessing treatment was the biggest problem facing the national healthcare system. This is much higher than the global average of 32 percent and is in line with the high cost of health care in the U.S. compared to other high-income countries. Bureaucracy along with a lack of staff were also considered to be pressing issues. This statistic reveals the share of individuals who said select problems were the biggest facing the health care system in the United States in 2024.

This table contains information on expenditure and financing in current prices on the health care used by residents in the Netherlands in one year. All activities within the area of health care are included, irrespective of whether they are performed within or outside the health care sector. These figures are based on the definition of the System of Health Accounts as used by EUROSTAT, the OECD and the WHO. The figures are derived from the Dutch statistics on health and social care, which cover a broader range of activities (including e.g. child day care, welfare, and social services). Exports are also included. In this table it can be found in the function M1(HC)+ : Other goods, services + exports.

This table also shows how the total figure in accordance with the System of Health Accounts is calculated from the total figure on health and social care:

Total figure on health and social care -/- health-related activities -/- other goods, services and exports (including welfare and children's day care, function M1(HC)+) = Total current expenditure on health

Data available from: 1998

Status of the figures: The figures for 2020 are provisional; the figures for 2018-2019 are revised provisional; the figures for the other years are final.

Changes as of 29 June 2021: The figures for 2020 have been added, the figures for 2017-2019 have been updated.

When will new figures be published? In the second quarter of 2022 the 2018-2020 data will be updated and provisional figures on 2021 will be published.