International interdisciplinary research journal Impact Factor 2024-2025 - ResearchHelpDesk - Aayushi International Interdisciplinary Research Journal (AIIRJ) publish articles, research papers etc. in every sphere of education for instance: Teaching-Learning process, Technologies in education and research etc. It publishes articles, research papers etc. in peer reviewed and refereed journal with excellent Impact Factor. The journal emphasis on originality, accuracy and relevance of the work. It ensures a strict vigil on plagiarism. Obviously the access of journal is online which is easy and free for all. It is purely intended for researchers in all discipline. The editorial and regional board members are committed to enhance the scope of interdisciplinary research. Their attempt is to explore innovative researchin education and to offer new direction and wings to the research beneficiaries. THE FEATURES OF AIIRJ World-wide access. Peer review process. Well-known and Experienced Editorial Board Members. Fast publication process. Special Issue for conference, workshops, Symposium, seminars etc. Reasonable and affordable publication charges Facility of On-line Submission. Journal Finder Option allows the researchers to find research paper either by author’s name or title of research article

International interdisciplinary research journal Publication fee - ResearchHelpDesk - Aayushi International Interdisciplinary Research Journal (AIIRJ) publish articles, research papers etc. in every sphere of education for instance: Teaching-Learning process, Technologies in education and research etc. It publishes articles, research papers etc. in peer reviewed and refereed journal with excellent Impact Factor. The journal emphasis on originality, accuracy and relevance of the work. It ensures a strict vigil on plagiarism. Obviously the access of journal is online which is easy and free for all. It is purely intended for researchers in all discipline. The editorial and regional board members are committed to enhance the scope of interdisciplinary research. Their attempt is to explore innovative researchin education and to offer new direction and wings to the research beneficiaries. THE FEATURES OF AIIRJ World-wide access. Peer review process. Well-known and Experienced Editorial Board Members. Fast publication process. Special Issue for conference, workshops, Symposium, seminars etc. Reasonable and affordable publication charges Facility of On-line Submission. Journal Finder Option allows the researchers to find research paper either by author’s name or title of research article

International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research Impact Factor 2024-2025 - ResearchHelpDesk - IJSTR - International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research is an open access international journal from diverse fields in sciences, engineering, and technologies Open Access that emphasizes new research, development, and applications. Papers reporting original research or extended versions of already published conference/journal papers are all welcomed. Papers for publication are selected through peer review to ensure originality, relevance, and readability. IJSTR ensures a wide indexing policy to make published papers highly visible to the scientific community. IJSTR is part of the eco-friendly community and favors e-publication mode for being an online 'GREEN journal'. IJSTR is an international peer-reviewed, electronic, online journal published monthly. The aim and scope of the journal is to provide an academic medium and an important reference for the advancement and dissemination of research results that support high-level learning, teaching, and research in the fields of engineering, science, and technology. Original theoretical work and application-based studies, which contribute to a better understanding of engineering, science, and technological challenges, are encouraged. IJSTR Publication Charges IJSTR covers the costs partially through article processing fees. IJSTR expenses are split among peer review administration and management, production of articles in PDF format, editorial costs, electronic composition and production, journal information system, manuscript management system, electronic archiving, overhead expenses, and administrative costs. Moreover, we are providing research paper publishing in minimum available costing such as there are no charges for rejected articles, no submission charges, and no surcharges based on the figures or supplementary data. IJSTR Publication Indexing IJSTR ​​​​​submit all published papers to indexing partners. Indexing totally depends on the content, indexing partner guidelines, and their indexing procedures. This is the reason sometimes indexing happens immediately and sometimes it takes time. Publication with IJSTR does not guarantee that paper will surely be added indexing partner website. The whole process for including any article (s) in the Scopus database is done by the Scopus team only. Journal or Publication House doesn't have any involvement in the decision whether to accept or reject a paper for the Scopus database and cannot influence the processing time of paper. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research RG Journal Impact: 0.31 * *This value is calculated using ResearchGate data and is based on average citation counts from work published in this journal. The data used in the calculation may not be exhaustive. RG Journal impact history 2018 / 2019 0.31 2017 0.34 2016 0.33 2015 0.36 2014 0.19 Is Ijstr Scopus indexed? Yes IJSTR - International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research Journal is Scopus indexed. please visit for more details - IJSTR Scoups

The global publication support services market, valued at $340 million in 2025, is projected to experience robust growth, driven by a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 18.8% from 2025 to 2033. This expansion is fueled by several key factors. The increasing number of academic publications and the growing complexity of the publication process are pushing researchers and institutions to seek professional support. The rising demand for high-quality publications to enhance academic reputation and research impact is further boosting market growth. Specific drivers include the rising adoption of online manuscript submission and peer-review platforms, the need for professional editing and formatting services to meet stringent journal requirements, and the increasing preference for manuscript artwork preparation services to enhance visual appeal and data clarity. The market is segmented by application (schools and enterprises) and service type (journal selection, manuscript submission, peer review & pre-submission, manuscript artwork preparation, and others), providing diverse opportunities for market players. The North American region, particularly the United States, is expected to maintain a significant market share due to robust research funding and a high concentration of academic institutions and pharmaceutical companies. However, growth in Asia-Pacific, driven by increasing research activity in countries like China and India, is poised to challenge North America’s dominance in the coming years. Competitive pressures among the established players, including Enago, Cactus, LetPub, and others, are driving innovation in service offerings and pricing strategies. The projected CAGR indicates substantial market expansion, with the market size exceeding $1 billion by 2033. While precise regional breakdowns are not provided, a reasonable estimation based on typical global market distributions and the identified growth drivers would suggest North America and Asia-Pacific holding the largest market shares. Challenges to growth could include the increasing cost of professional publication services, potentially limiting access for researchers in resource-constrained environments. Nevertheless, the overall trend indicates significant and sustained market growth propelled by the fundamental need for high-quality research dissemination and the associated complexities of modern academic publishing. Companies are likely to explore new avenues like AI-powered editing tools and specialized services catered to specific disciplines, leading to market segmentation and specialization.

Topic Modeling for Research Articles

Researchers have access to large online archives of scientific articles. As a consequence, finding relevant articles has become more difficult. Tagging or topic modelling provides a way to give token of identification to research articles which facilitates recommendation and search process.

Given the abstract and title for a set of research articles, predict the topics for each article included in the test set.

Note that a research article can possibly have more than 1 topic. The research article abstracts and titles are sourced from the following 6 topics:

1. Computer Science
2. Physics
3. Mathematics
4. Statistics
5. Quantitative Biology
6. Quantitative Finance

Data Dictionary

train.csv

What's inside is more than just rows and columns. Make it easy for others to get started by describing how you acquired the data and what time period it represents, too.

test.csv

Evaluation Metric

Submissions are evaluated on micro F1 Score between the predicted and observed topics for each article in the test set

### Public and Private Split Test reviews are further divided into Public (40%) and Private (60%)

Your initial responses will be checked and scored on the Public data. The final rankings would be based on your private score which will be published once the competition is over.

Guidelines for Final Submission

1. Please ensure that your final submission includes the following:
2. Solution file containing the predicted 1/0 for each of the 6 topics for every research article in the test set
3. Code file for reproducing the submission, note that it is mandatory to submit your code for a valid final submission

United States agricultural researchers have many options for making their data available online. This dataset aggregates the primary sources of ag-related data and determines where researchers are likely to deposit their agricultural data. These data serve as both a current landscape analysis and also as a baseline for future studies of ag research data. Purpose As sources of agricultural data become more numerous and disparate, and collaboration and open data become more expected if not required, this research provides a landscape inventory of online sources of open agricultural data. An inventory of current agricultural data sharing options will help assess how the Ag Data Commons, a platform for USDA-funded data cataloging and publication, can best support data-intensive and multi-disciplinary research. It will also help agricultural librarians assist their researchers in data management and publication. The goals of this study were to establish where agricultural researchers in the United States-- land grant and USDA researchers, primarily ARS, NRCS, USFS and other agencies -- currently publish their data, including general research data repositories, _domain-specific databases, and the top journals compare how much data is in institutional vs. _domain-specific vs. federal platforms determine which repositories are recommended by top journals that require or recommend the publication of supporting data ascertain where researchers not affiliated with funding or initiatives possessing a designated open data repository can publish data Approach The National Agricultural Library team focused on Agricultural Research Service (ARS), Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), and United States Forest Service (USFS) style research data, rather than ag economics, statistics, and social sciences data. To find _domain-specific, general, institutional, and federal agency repositories and databases that are open to US research submissions and have some amount of ag data, resources including re3data, libguides, and ARS lists were analysed. Primarily environmental or public health databases were not included, but places where ag grantees would publish data were considered. Search methods We first compiled a list of known _domain specific USDA / ARS datasets / databases that are represented in the Ag Data Commons, including ARS Image Gallery, ARS Nutrition Databases (sub-components), SoyBase, PeanutBase, National Fungus Collection, i5K Workspace @ NAL, and GRIN. We then searched using search engines such as Bing and Google for non-USDA / federal ag databases, using Boolean variations of “agricultural data” /“ag data” / “scientific data” + NOT + USDA (to filter out the federal / USDA results). Most of these results were _domain specific, though some contained a mix of data subjects. We then used search engines such as Bing and Google to find top agricultural university repositories using variations of “agriculture”, “ag data” and “university” to find schools with agriculture programs. Using that list of universities, we searched each university web site to see if their institution had a repository for their unique, independent research data if not apparent in the initial web browser search. We found both ag specific university repositories and general university repositories that housed a portion of agricultural data. Ag specific university repositories are included in the list of _domain-specific repositories. Results included Columbia University – International Research Institute for Climate and Society, UC Davis – Cover Crops Database, etc. If a general university repository existed, we determined whether that repository could filter to include only data results after our chosen ag search terms were applied. General university databases that contain ag data included Colorado State University Digital Collections, University of Michigan ICPSR (Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research), and University of Minnesota DRUM (Digital Repository of the University of Minnesota). We then split out NCBI (National Center for Biotechnology Information) repositories. Next we searched the internet for open general data repositories using a variety of search engines, and repositories containing a mix of data, journals, books, and other types of records were tested to determine whether that repository could filter for data results after search terms were applied. General subject data repositories include Figshare, Open Science Framework, PANGEA, Protein Data Bank, and Zenodo. Finally, we compared scholarly journal suggestions for data repositories against our list to fill in any missing repositories that might contain agricultural data. Extensive lists of journals were compiled, in which USDA published in 2012 and 2016, combining search results in ARIS, Scopus, and the Forest Service's TreeSearch, plus the USDA web sites Economic Research Service (ERS), National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Natural Resources and Conservation Service (NRCS), Food and Nutrition Service (FNS), Rural Development (RD), and Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS). The top 50 journals' author instructions were consulted to see if they (a) ask or require submitters to provide supplemental data, or (b) require submitters to submit data to open repositories. Data are provided for Journals based on a 2012 and 2016 study of where USDA employees publish their research studies, ranked by number of articles, including 2015/2016 Impact Factor, Author guidelines, Supplemental Data?, Supplemental Data reviewed?, Open Data (Supplemental or in Repository) Required? and Recommended data repositories, as provided in the online author guidelines for each the top 50 journals. Evaluation We ran a series of searches on all resulting general subject databases with the designated search terms. From the results, we noted the total number of datasets in the repository, type of resource searched (datasets, data, images, components, etc.), percentage of the total database that each term comprised, any dataset with a search term that comprised at least 1% and 5% of the total collection, and any search term that returned greater than 100 and greater than 500 results. We compared _domain-specific databases and repositories based on parent organization, type of institution, and whether data submissions were dependent on conditions such as funding or affiliation of some kind. Results A summary of the major findings from our data review: Over half of the top 50 ag-related journals from our profile require or encourage open data for their published authors. There are few general repositories that are both large AND contain a significant portion of ag data in their collection. GBIF (Global Biodiversity Information Facility), ICPSR, and ORNL DAAC were among those that had over 500 datasets returned with at least one ag search term and had that result comprise at least 5% of the total collection. Not even one quarter of the _domain-specific repositories and datasets reviewed allow open submission by any researcher regardless of funding or affiliation. See included README file for descriptions of each individual data file in this dataset. Resources in this dataset:Resource Title: Journals. File Name: Journals.csvResource Title: Journals - Recommended repositories. File Name: Repos_from_journals.csvResource Title: TDWG presentation. File Name: TDWG_Presentation.pptxResource Title: Domain Specific ag data sources. File Name: domain_specific_ag_databases.csvResource Title: Data Dictionary for Ag Data Repository Inventory. File Name: Ag_Data_Repo_DD.csvResource Title: General repositories containing ag data. File Name: general_repos_1.csvResource Title: README and file inventory. File Name: README_InventoryPublicDBandREepAgData.txt

Given the increase in the use and profile of preprint servers – and alternative publishing hybrid platforms such as F1000 Research – in the life sciences, it is increasingly important to identify how many such servers and hybrids exist, to describe their scope in terms of the scientific disciplines they cover, and to compare and contrast their characteristics and policies.

We surveyed forty-four (44) platforms that host preprints relevant to life and biomedical sciences and that were active online and accepting submissions on 25 June 2019. Information on preprint platform policies, features and practices was collected through online research by the authors and by surveying preprint platform representatives directly.

Full data sheets include an additional 5 platforms hosted on OSF Preprints (rows 49-53) to fulfil the wider scope for the ASAPbio project, not in disciplinary scope (biology and medical sciences) for the manuscript with Jamie Kirkham.

Tables 1-5: Data (44 platforms, manuscript) are separated into five main tables of information and a list of preprint platform websites for reference.

Table 1: Scope and ownership of each server Table 2: Content-specific characteristics and information relating to submission, journal transfer options, and external discoverability Table 3: Screening, moderation, and permanence of content Table 4: Usage metrics and other features Table 5: Metadata Preprint platform websites

Data for each platform are listed as ‘Verified’ in the tables if these tables (V1.0 or V2.0) were seen and approved by a platform representative between January 13 and January 27, 2020.

Original online survey: a blank copy of the original survey form used by online researchers (the authors) and supplied pre-filled (or empty, in some cases) to preprint platform representatives for verification (or completion, in some cases).

Final data: survey data is presented in .txt and .xlsx, as follows:

Row 1: Heading (where field is included in manuscript tables, the heading presented here replaces any heading used in original survey. All columns are presented in the order the information was requested on the original survey form, with some supplementary columns added and columns removed (detailed below).

Row 2: Schema or description of field

Row 3: Whether and where included in manuscript tables. For supporting information for table data (e.g. source information, URLs), the table location for supported data is indicated in brackets, e.g. (Table 2) and supporting information is not included in tables. Data included in manuscript tables is presented in its final form, which in some cases is simplified from the original survey data. This simplified version of the data was presented to platform representatives for additional verification (v1.0/v2.0 verification). Data not included in manuscript tables is presented here as verified by platform representatives and/or found online. Some columns from the original survey have been removed due to the information not being informative or useful: specifically, Print ISSN (not reported for any platform); End date (no platforms have an end date; although two platforms stopped accepting submissions after survey completed; Personal contact information for platform representative(s) has been removed).

Rows 4 onwards: data for each preprint platform (44 included in manuscript (rows 4-47), plus 5 additional OSF platforms (rows 48-52)

Columns 3-6 (D-G) report online research and verification information and Column 13 (M) reports an additional data field (number of articles) – these are supplementary to the original survey columns

Verification status: Released V1/V2 data applies to data included in manuscript tables (as indicated in row 3); Online survey data applies to data used for manuscript tables and also to original survey data included here but not included in manuscript tables (‘Not included’ in row 3)

Note that data fields are presented as individual columns in these sheets, while some entries in Tables 1-5 combine several data fields.

These data were collected in collaboration and as part of: i. An ASAPbio project, led by Dr Naomi Penfold, to develop an online directory of preprint platforms ii. A research project led by Prof Jamie Kirkham These data are supplementary outputs for both projects.

Data v1.0 were presented during the ASAPbio January 2020 workshop – see Penfold, Naomi C, & Polka, Jessica. (2020, January). ASAPbio Preprint Platform Directory: 2019 data (presentation) (Version 1.0). Zenodo. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3626770.

Version 3.0 updates (December 14, 2020): added new files with updated information about servers from the ASAPbio preprint directory (https://asapbio.org/preprint-servers), provided by Jessica Polka (now included as author).

The University of British Columbia has developed a course-based undergraduate research experience (CURE) that engages students in authentic molecular microbiology research. This capstone course is uniquely built around an open-access online undergraduate research journal entitled Undergraduate Journal of Experimental Microbiology and Immunology (UJEMI). Students work in teams to derive an original research question, formulate a testable hypothesis, draft a research proposal, carry out experiments in the laboratory, and publish their results in UJEMI. The CURE operates in a feed forward manner whereby student-authored UJEMI publications drive research questions in subsequent terms of the course. Progress toward submission of an original manuscript is scaffolded using a series of communication assignments which facilitate formative development. We present a periodic model of our CURE that guides students through a research cycle. We review two ongoing course-based projects to highlight how UJEMI publications prime new research questions in the course. A journal-driven CURE represents a broadly applicable pedagogical tool that immerses students in the process of doing science.

The Journal Review Service market is anticipated to grow with a notable CAGR during the forecast period. This growth is attributed to the increasing demand for high-quality research publications, the growing number of research institutions, and the increasing adoption of online submission systems. The key drivers of the market include the growing emphasis on academic research, the increasing number of research publications, the growing adoption of online submission systems, and the increasing availability of peer review services. However, the high cost of journal review services and the lack of awareness about these services are some of the restraints that are expected to hinder the growth of the market.

Publication Support Services Market Outlook

The global publication support services market size was valued at approximately USD 2.5 billion in 2023 and is projected to reach USD 5.3 billion by 2032, registering a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 8.5% during the forecast period. This impressive growth is driven by increasing demand for quality content and the rising necessity for academic and corporate publications to maintain high standards of accuracy and presentation.

One of the primary growth factors in this market is the escalating volume of research output worldwide. With academic institutions, research organizations, and corporations producing a significant amount of research, there is a growing need for professional support to ensure that publications are clear, accurate, and meet the required standards. Furthermore, the globalization of research and the need for multi-lingual publications have amplified the demand for translation and peer review services, contributing to the marketÂ’s expansion.

Technological advancements have also played a crucial role in propelling the publication support services market. The advent of AI-powered editing tools, advanced formatting software, and digital illustration techniques have enabled service providers to deliver high-quality support efficiently and effectively. These technologies not only enhance the accuracy and quality of publications but also reduce the turnaround time, making it easier for researchers and authors to meet tight deadlines. Additionally, the widespread adoption of online platforms for manuscript submission and peer review processes supports market growth.

The growing emphasis on academic integrity and ethical publishing practices is another significant growth driver. With increased awareness of plagiarism and the importance of original research, there is a greater demand for meticulous editing and peer review services. Institutions and organizations are investing heavily in these services to ensure that their publications uphold high ethical standards, thereby enhancing their reputation and credibility in the academic and corporate world.

The rise of Electronic Publishing has significantly influenced the publication support services market, offering new avenues for content dissemination and accessibility. With the transition from traditional print to digital formats, electronic publishing has enabled faster and more efficient distribution of scholarly works. This shift has not only expanded the reach of academic and corporate publications but also necessitated the adaptation of support services to cater to digital platforms. As a result, service providers are increasingly focusing on enhancing digital formatting, ensuring compatibility with various e-readers and online platforms, and optimizing content for search engines. The evolution of electronic publishing continues to drive innovation in the industry, providing opportunities for service providers to offer specialized solutions tailored to the digital landscape.

Regionally, North America dominates the publication support services market, accounting for the largest share due to the presence of leading academic institutions, research organizations, and a high volume of scholarly publications. However, the Asia Pacific region is expected to witness the highest growth rate during the forecast period. This growth is fueled by increasing research activities, government initiatives to promote scientific research, and the rising number of academic institutions in countries such as China and India.

Service Type Analysis

The publication support services market is segmented by service type into editing, formatting, translation, peer review, illustration, and others. The editing segment holds a significant market share as it is essential for ensuring clarity, coherence, and compliance with publication standards. Professional editing services help refine the language, correct grammatical errors, and enhance the overall readability of manuscripts, making them suitable for publication in top-tier journals. The demand for specialized editing services, including technical and scientific editing, is particularly high in the academic and research sectors.

Formatting services also constitute a crucial segment of the publication support services market. Proper formatting ensures that manuscripts adhere to the specific guidelines of journals and publishers, which can be a complex and time-co

This study aimed at analyzing the bibliometric characteristics and content of medical articles from North Korea in PubMed and characterizing the patterns of international cooperation of medical researchers in North Korea. We hypothesized that the number of publications from North Korea in PubMed has increased recently as a result of active cooperation with foreign researchers. PubMed was searched on July 19, 2017 using the search tem ((North Korea [Affiliation]) OR Democratic People's Republic of Korea [Affiliation]) OR DPRK [Affiliation]. The content of medical articles was analyzed and cooperative work with foreign researchers was noted. The number of medical articles in PubMed through July 2017 was 16, of which 2 were by North Korean authors only. From the content of these articles, it was found that researchers in top-notch institutions, including Kim Il Sung University, can access the internet, and that a dental caries prevention program supported by Finland has been in place for more than 10 years. The number of publications from North Korea in PubMed has increased recently, although the amount is still very small. Providing internet access to North Korean researchers will accelerate their submissions to international journals.

Think of your current publishing practices in comparison with practices before the pandemic and tell us to what extent you agree or disagree with each statement (%).

Country differences for change in research time.

What impact has the pandemic had on the time you allocated to research?

Was working from home and/or working remotely a benefit or a hindrance?

How has the pandemic affected your ability to do the following? (%).

International Journal of Global Science Research Impact Factor 2024-2025 - ResearchHelpDesk - International Journal of Global Science Research - IJGSR is Open access, Peer-reviewed, Refereed, Indexed, Biannual, Bilingual, Impacted Academic Journal. IJGSR welcomes the submission of manuscripts via its online for the current issue. Submit your resent Research paper, Short communication, Review, Extended versions of already published in Conference/ Journal papers, Academic article, and Letter to the Editor. IJGSR publishes papers on a broad range of topics in the areas of Environmental Sciences, Environmental Ethics, Environmental Legislation, Environmental Impact Assessment, Environmental Management, Environmental Policies, Environmental Pollution, Natural Resources Conservation, Biosciences, Agricultural Science, Anthropology and Behavioral Sciences, Animal Husbandry, Aquaculture, Biodiversity, Biotechnology, Biochemistry, Bioinformatics, Cell, and Molecular Biology, Fish and Fisheries, Home Sciences, Immunology, Life Sciences, Limnology, Medical Sciences, Microbiology, Nutrition, Plant Sciences, Taxonomy, Tissue Culture, Toxicology, Veterinary Sciences, Wildlife Conservation, Zoology, Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Mineralogy and Wildlife which hold much promise for the future, are also within the scope of International Journal of Global Science Research. The published papers are made highly visible to the scientific community through a wide indexing policy adopted by this online international journal. IJGSR is currently indexed in ISSN Directory, NISCAIR, Road Directory, Google Scholar, INDEX COPERNICUS.

Country differences for publishing practices.

How secure do you feel in your employment situation compared to pre-pandemic times?

Country differences for networking (mean).