Performance Measure Definition: Average Call Processing Interval

This metric, mean percent FRID, is a measure of the extent to which contemporary fires (i.e., since 1908) are burning at frequencies similar to the frequencies that occurred prior to Euro-American settlement, with the mean reference FRI as the basis for comparison. Mean PFRID is a metric of fire return interval departure (FRID), and measures the departure of current FRI from reference mean FRI in percent.

Performance Measure Definition: STEMI Alert Call-to-Door Interval

Performance Measure Definition: Stroke Alert Call-to-Door Interval

This dataset is about: (Table 3 core) Interval-mean bedding directions based on core-scan data of core CRP-3. Please consult parent dataset @ https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.485006 for more information.

Supporting documentation on code lists, subject definitions, data accuracy, and statistical testing can be found on the American Community Survey website in the Data and Documentation section...Sample size and data quality measures (including coverage rates, allocation rates, and response rates) can be found on the American Community Survey website in the Methodology section..Although the American Community Survey (ACS) produces population, demographic and housing unit estimates, for 2010, the 2010 Census provides the official counts of the population and housing units for the nation, states, counties, cities and towns. For 2006 to 2009, the Population Estimates Program provides intercensal estimates of the population for the nation, states, and counties..Explanation of Symbols:.An ''**'' entry in the margin of error column indicates that either no sample observations or too few sample observations were available to compute a standard error and thus the margin of error. A statistical test is not appropriate..An ''-'' entry in the estimate column indicates that either no sample observations or too few sample observations were available to compute an estimate, or a ratio of medians cannot be calculated because one or both of the median estimates falls in the lowest interval or upper interval of an open-ended distribution..An ''-'' following a median estimate means the median falls in the lowest interval of an open-ended distribution..An ''+'' following a median estimate means the median falls in the upper interval of an open-ended distribution..An ''***'' entry in the margin of error column indicates that the median falls in the lowest interval or upper interval of an open-ended distribution. A statistical test is not appropriate..An ''*****'' entry in the margin of error column indicates that the estimate is controlled. A statistical test for sampling variability is not appropriate. .An ''N'' entry in the estimate and margin of error columns indicates that data for this geographic area cannot be displayed because the number of sample cases is too small..An ''(X)'' means that the estimate is not applicable or not available..Estimates of urban and rural population, housing units, and characteristics reflect boundaries of urban areas defined based on Census 2000 data. Boundaries for urban areas have not been updated since Census 2000. As a result, data for urban and rural areas from the ACS do not necessarily reflect the results of ongoing urbanization..While the 2006-2010 American Community Survey (ACS) data generally reflect the December 2009 Office of Management and Budget (OMB) definitions of metropolitan and micropolitan statistical areas; in certain instances the names, codes, and boundaries of the principal cities shown in ACS tables may differ from the OMB definitions due to differences in the effective dates of the geographic entities..Occupation codes are 4-digit codes and are based on the Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) 2010. The 2010 Census occupation codes were updated in accordance with the 2010 revision of the SOC. To allow for the creation of 2006-2010 and 2008-2010 tables, occupation data in the multiyear files (2006-2010 and 2008-2010) were recoded to 2010 Census occupation codes. We recommend using caution when comparing data coded using 2010 Census occupation codes with data coded using previous Census occupation codes. For more information on the Census occupation code changes, please visit our website at http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/ioindex/..Data are based on a sample and are subject to sampling variability. The degree of uncertainty for an estimate arising from sampling variability is represented through the use of a margin of error. The value shown here is the 90 percent margin of error. The margin of error can be interpreted roughly as providing a 90 percent probability that the interval defined by the estimate minus the margin of error and the estimate plus the margin of error (the lower and upper confidence bounds) contains the true value. In addition to sampling variability, the ACS estimates are subject to nonsampling error (for a discussion of nonsampling variability, see Accuracy of the Data). The effect of nonsampling error is not represented in these tables..Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2006-2010 American Community Survey

This paper considers identification and estimation of a fixed-effects model with an interval-censored dependent variable. In each time period, the researcher observes the interval (with known endpoints) in which the dependent variable lies but not the value of the dependent variable itself. Two versions of the model are considered: a parametric model with logistic errors and a semiparametric model with errors having an unspecified distribution. In both cases, the error disturbances can be heteroskedastic over cross-sectional units as long as they are stationary within a cross-sectional unit; the semiparametric model also allows for serial correlation of the error disturbances. A conditional-logit-type composite likelihood estimator is proposed for the logistic fixed-effects model, and a composite maximum-score-type estimator is proposed for the semiparametric model. In general, the scale of the coefficient parameters is identified by these estimators, meaning that the causal effects of interest are estimated directly in cases where the latent dependent variable is of primary interest (e.g., pure data-coding situations). Monte Carlo simulations and an empirical application to birthweight outcomes illustrate the performance of the parametric estimator.

Performance Measure Definition: Trauma Alert Scene Interval

This dataset identifies all regions in which the full 95% confidence interval is between 4 and 16 �C for all 12 months. The sea surface temperature data includes the mean sea surface temperature per month, the standard deviation and the number of observations used to calculate the mean. Based on these values, the 95% upper and lower confidence levels about the mean for each month have been generated.

This dataset identifies all regions in which the full 95% confidence interval is between 4 and 18 �C for all 12 months. The sea surface temperature data includes the mean sea surface temperature per month, the standard deviation and the number of observations used to calculate the mean. Based on these values, the 95% upper and lower confidence levels about the mean for each month have been generated.

代码和测试数据

Percent FRID (PFRID) quantifies the extent in percentage to which recent fires (i.e., since 1970) are burning at frequencies similar to those that occurred prior to Euro-American settlement, with the mean reference FRI as the basis for comparison. Mean PFRID measures the departure of current FRI from reference mean FRI in percent

No description is available. Visit https://dataone.org/datasets/b5fdc1ea17635240a07a1c29f51df64f for complete metadata about this dataset.

Broad-scale alterations of historical fire regimes and vegetation dynamics have occurred in many landscapes in the U.S. through the combined influence of land management practices, fire exclusion, ungulate herbivory, insect and disease outbreaks, climate change, and invasion of non-native plant species. The LANDFIRE Program produces maps of historical fire regimes and vegetation conditions using the disturbance dynamics model VDDT. The LANDFIRE Program also produces maps of current vegetation and measurements of current vegetation departure from simulated historical reference conditions. These maps support fire and landscape management planning outlined in the goals of the National Fire Plan, Federal Wildland Fire Management Policy, and the Healthy Forests Restoration Act. Data Summary: The Historical Mean Fire Return Interval data layer quantifies the average number of years between fires under the presumed historical fire regime. This data layer is derived from vegetation and disturbance dynamics model VDDT. This layer was created by linking the BpS layer to the Mean Fire Return Interval rulesets. This layer is intended to describe one component of historical fire regime characteristics in the context of the broader historical time period represented by the LANDFIRE Biophysical Settings layer and LANDFIRE Biophysical Settings Model documentation. This geospatial product should display a reasonable approximation of Historical Mean Fire Return Interval, as documented in the Refresh Model Tracker. Historical mean fire return intervals were classified into 22 categories of varying temporal length to preserve finer detail for more frequently burned areas and less detail for rarely burned areas. Additional data layer values were included to represent Water (111), Snow / Ice (112), Barren (131), and Sparsely Vegetated (132). Vegetated areas that never burned during the simulations were included in the category Indeterminate Fire Regime Characteristics (133); these vegetation types either had no defined fire behavior or had extremely low probabilities of fire ignition. Metadata and Downloads

ABSTRACT

The issue of diagnosing psychotic diseases, including schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, in particular, the objectification of symptom severity assessment, is still a problem requiring the attention of researchers. Two measures that can be helpful in patient diagnosis are heart rate variability calculated based on electrocardiographic signal and accelerometer mobility data. The following dataset contains data from 30 psychiatric ward patients having schizophrenia or bipolar disorder and 30 healthy persons. The duration of the measurements for individuals was usually between 1.5 and 2 hours. R-R intervals necessary for heart rate variability calculation were collected simultaneously with accelerometer data using a wearable Polar H10 device. The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) test was performed for each patient participating in the experiment, and its results were attached to the dataset. Furthermore, the code for loading and preprocessing data, as well as for statistical analysis, was included on the corresponding GitHub repository.

BACKGROUND

Heart rate variability (HRV), calculated based on electrocardiographic (ECG) recordings of R-R intervals stemming from the heart's electrical activity, may be used as a biomarker of mental illnesses, including schizophrenia and bipolar disorder (BD) [Benjamin et al]. The variations of R-R interval values correspond to the heart's autonomic regulation changes [Berntson et al, Stogios et al]. Moreover, the HRV measure reflects the activity of the sympathetic and parasympathetic parts of the autonomous nervous system (ANS) [Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology the North American Society of Pacing Electrophysiology, Matusik et al]. Patients with psychotic mental disorders show a tendency for a change in the centrally regulated ANS balance in the direction of less dynamic changes in the ANS activity in response to different environmental conditions [Stogios et al]. Larger sympathetic activity relative to the parasympathetic one leads to lower HRV, while, on the other hand, higher parasympathetic activity translates to higher HRV. This loss of dynamic response may be an indicator of mental health. Additional benefits may come from measuring the daily activity of patients using accelerometry. This may be used to register periods of physical activity and inactivity or withdrawal for further correlation with HRV values recorded at the same time.

EXPERIMENTS

In our experiment, the participants were 30 psychiatric ward patients with schizophrenia or BD and 30 healthy people. All measurements were performed using a Polar H10 wearable device. The sensor collects ECG recordings and accelerometer data and, additionally, prepares a detection of R wave peaks. Participants of the experiment had to wear the sensor for a given time. Basically, it was between 1.5 and 2 hours, but the shortest recording was 70 minutes. During this time, evaluated persons could perform any activity a few minutes after starting the measurement. Participants were encouraged to undertake physical activity and, more specifically, to take a walk. Due to patients being in the medical ward, they received instruction to take a walk in the corridors at the beginning of the experiment. They were to repeat the walk 30 minutes and 1 hour after the first walk. The subsequent walks were to be slightly longer (about 3, 5 and 7 minutes, respectively). We did not remind or supervise the command during the experiment, both in the treatment and the control group. Seven persons from the control group did not receive this order and their measurements correspond to freely selected activities with rest periods but at least three of them performed physical activities during this time. Nevertheless, at the start of the experiment, all participants were requested to rest in a sitting position for 5 minutes. Moreover, for each patient, the disease severity was assessed using the PANSS test and its scores are attached to the dataset.

The data from sensors were collected using Polar Sensor Logger application [Happonen]. Such extracted measurements were then preprocessed and analyzed using the code prepared by the authors of the experiment. It is publicly available on the GitHub repository [Książek et al].

Firstly, we performed a manual artifact detection to remove abnormal heartbeats due to non-sinus beats and technical issues of the device (e.g. temporary disconnections and inappropriate electrode readings). We also performed anomaly detection using Daubechies wavelet transform. Nevertheless, the dataset includes raw data, while a full code necessary to reproduce our anomaly detection approach is available in the repository. Optionally, it is also possible to perform cubic spline data interpolation. After that step, rolling windows of a particular size and time intervals between them are created. Then, a statistical analysis is prepared, e.g. mean HRV calculation using the RMSSD (Root Mean Square of Successive Differences) approach, measuring a relationship between mean HRV and PANSS scores, mobility coefficient calculation based on accelerometer data and verification of dependencies between HRV and mobility scores.

DATA DESCRIPTION

The structure of the dataset is as follows. One folder, called HRV_anonymized_data contains values of R-R intervals together with timestamps for each experiment participant. The data was properly anonymized, i.e. the day of the measurement was removed to prevent person identification. Files concerned with patients have the name treatment_X.csv, where X is the number of the person, while files related to the healthy controls are named control_Y.csv, where Y is the identification number of the person. Furthermore, for visualization purposes, an image of the raw RR intervals for each participant is presented. Its name is raw_RR_{control,treatment}_N.png, where N is the number of the person from the control/treatment group. The collected data are raw, i.e. before the anomaly removal. The code enabling reproducing the anomaly detection stage and removing suspicious heartbeats is publicly available in the repository [Książek et al]. The structure of consecutive files collecting R-R intervals is following:

Phone timestamp	RR-interval [ms]
12:43:26.538000	651
12:43:27.189000	632
12:43:27.821000	618
12:43:28.439000	621
12:43:29.060000	661
...	...

The first column contains the timestamp for which the distance between two consecutive R peaks was registered. The corresponding R-R interval is presented in the second column of the file and is expressed in milliseconds.
The second folder, called accelerometer_anonymized_data contains values of accelerometer data collected at the same time as R-R intervals. The naming convention is similar to that of the R-R interval data: treatment_X.csv and control_X.csv represent the data coming from the persons from the treatment and control group, respectively, while X is the identification number of the selected participant. The numbers are exactly the same as for R-R intervals. The structure of the files with accelerometer recordings is as follows:

Phone timestamp	X [mg]	Y [mg]	Z [mg]
13:00:17.196000	-961	-23	182
13:00:17.205000	-965	-21	181
13:00:17.215000	-966	-22	187
13:00:17.225000	-967	-26	193
13:00:17.235000	-965	-27	191
...	...	...	...

The first column contains a timestamp, while the next three columns correspond to the currently registered acceleration in three axes: X, Y and Z, in milli-g unit.

We also attached a file with the PANSS test scores (PANSS.csv) for all patients participating in the measurement. The structure of this file is as follows:

no_of_person	PANSS_P	PANSS_N	PANSS_G	PANSS_total
1	8	13	22	43
2	11	7	18	36
3	14	30	44	88
4	18	13	27	58
...	...	...	...	..

The first column contains the identification number of the patient, while the three following columns refer to the PANSS scores related to positive, negative and general symptoms, respectively.

USAGE NOTES

All the files necessary to run the HRV and/or accelerometer data analysis are available on the GitHub repository [Książek et al]. HRV data loading, preprocessing (i.e. anomaly detection and removal), as well as the

Performance Measure Definition: Trauma Alert Call-to-Door Interval

In genomic study, log transformation is a common prepossessing step to adjust for skewness in data. This standard approach often assumes that log-transformed data is normally distributed, and two sample t-test (or its modifications) is used for detecting differences between two experimental conditions. However, recently it was shown that two sample t-test can lead to exaggerated false positives, and the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney (WMW) test was proposed as an alternative for studies with larger sample sizes. In addition, studies have demonstrated that the specific distribution used in modeling genomic data has profound impact on the interpretation and validity of results. The aim of this paper is three-fold: 1) to present the Exp-gamma distribution (exponential-gamma distribution stands for log-transformed gamma distribution) as a proper biological and statistical model for the analysis of log-transformed protein abundance data from single-cell experiments; 2) to demonstrate the inappropriateness of two sample t-test and the WMW test in analyzing log-transformed protein abundance data; 3) to propose and evaluate statistical inference methods for hypothesis testing and confidence interval estimation when comparing two independent samples under the Exp-gamma distributions. The proposed methods are applied to analyze protein abundance data from a single-cell dataset.

Supporting documentation on code lists, subject definitions, data accuracy, and statistical testing can be found on the American Community Survey website in the Data and Documentation section...Sample size and data quality measures (including coverage rates, allocation rates, and response rates) can be found on the American Community Survey website in the Methodology section..Although the American Community Survey (ACS) produces population, demographic and housing unit estimates, it is the Census Bureau''s Population Estimates Program that produces and disseminates the official estimates of the population for the nation, states, counties, cities and towns and estimates of housing units for states and counties..Explanation of Symbols:An ''**'' entry in the margin of error column indicates that either no sample observations or too few sample observations were available to compute a standard error and thus the margin of error. A statistical test is not appropriate..An ''-'' entry in the estimate column indicates that either no sample observations or too few sample observations were available to compute an estimate, or a ratio of medians cannot be calculated because one or both of the median estimates falls in the lowest interval or upper interval of an open-ended distribution..An ''-'' following a median estimate means the median falls in the lowest interval of an open-ended distribution..An ''+'' following a median estimate means the median falls in the upper interval of an open-ended distribution..An ''***'' entry in the margin of error column indicates that the median falls in the lowest interval or upper interval of an open-ended distribution. A statistical test is not appropriate..An ''*****'' entry in the margin of error column indicates that the estimate is controlled. A statistical test for sampling variability is not appropriate. .An ''N'' entry in the estimate and margin of error columns indicates that data for this geographic area cannot be displayed because the number of sample cases is too small..An ''(X)'' means that the estimate is not applicable or not available..Estimates of urban and rural population, housing units, and characteristics reflect boundaries of urban areas defined based on Census 2010 data. As a result, data for urban and rural areas from the ACS do not necessarily reflect the results of ongoing urbanization..While the 2013 American Community Survey (ACS) data generally reflect the February 2013 Office of Management and Budget (OMB) definitions of metropolitan and micropolitan statistical areas; in certain instances the names, codes, and boundaries of the principal cities shown in ACS tables may differ from the OMB definitions due to differences in the effective dates of the geographic entities..The 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, and 2013 plumbing data for Puerto Rico will not be shown. Research indicates that the questions on plumbing facilities that were introduced in 2008 in the stateside American Community Survey and the 2008 Puerto Rico Community Survey may not have been appropriate for Puerto Rico..In data year 2013, there were a series of changes to data collection operations that could have affected some estimates. These changes include the addition of Internet as a mode of data collection, the end of the content portion of Failed Edit Follow-Up interviewing, and the loss of one monthly panel due to the Federal Government shut down in October 2013. For more information, see: User Notes.Data are based on a sample and are subject to sampling variability. The degree of uncertainty for an estimate arising from sampling variability is represented through the use of a margin of error. The value shown here is the 90 percent margin of error. The margin of error can be interpreted roughly as providing a 90 percent probability that the interval defined by the estimate minus the margin of error and the estimate plus the margin of error (the lower and upper confidence bounds) contains the true value. In addition to sampling variability, the ACS estimates are subject to nonsampling error (for a discussion of nonsampling variability, see Accuracy of the Data). The effect of nonsampling error is not represented in these tables..Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2013 American Community Survey

This dataset identifies all regions in which the full 95% confidence interval is wholly between 2.5 and 19 �C for all 12 months. The sea surface temperature data includes the mean sea surface temperature per month, the standard deviation and the number of observations used to calculate the mean. Based on these values, the 95% upper and lower confidence levels about the mean for each month have been generated.

Broad-scale alterations of historical fire regimes and vegetation dynamics have occurred in many landscapes in the U.S. through the combined influence of land management practices, fire exclusion, ungulate herbivory, insect and disease outbreaks, climate change, and invasion of non-native plant species. The LANDFIRE Program produces maps of historical fire regimes and vegetation conditions using the disturbance dynamics model VDDT. The LANDFIRE Program also produces maps of current vegetation and measurements of current vegetation departure from simulated historical reference conditions. These maps support fire and landscape management planning outlined in the goals of the National Fire Plan, Federal Wildland Fire Management Policy, and the Healthy Forests Restoration Act.Data Summary: The Historical Mean Fire Return Interval data layer quantifies the average number of years between fires under the presumed historical fire regime. This data layer is derived from vegetation and disturbance dynamics model VDDT. This layer was created by linking the BpS layer to the Mean Fire Return Interval rulesets. This layer is intended to describe one component of historical fire regime characteristics in the context of the broader historical time period represented by the LANDFIRE Biophysical Settings layer and LANDFIRE Biophysical Settings Model documentation. This geospatial product should display a reasonable approximation of Historical Mean Fire Return Interval, as documented in the Refresh Model Tracker. Historical mean fire return intervals were classified into 22 categories of varying temporal length to preserve finer detail for more frequently burned areas and less detail for rarely burned areas. Additional data layer values were included to represent Water (111), Snow / Ice (112), Barren (131), and Sparsely Vegetated (132). Vegetated areas that never burned during the simulations were included in the category Indeterminate Fire Regime Characteristics (133); these vegetation types either had no defined fire behavior or had extremely low probabilities of fire ignition.�Metadata and Downloads