Facebook
TwitterImproving the quality of water discharged from agricultural watersheds requires comprehensive and adaptive approaches for planning and implementing conservation practices. These measures will need to consider landscape hydrology, distributions of soil types, land cover, and crop distributions in an integrated manner. The two most consistent challenges to these efforts will be consistency and reliability of data, and the capacity to translate conservation planning from watershed to farm and field scales. The translation of scale is required because, while conservation practices can be planned based on a watershed scale framework, they must be implemented by landowners in specific fields and riparian sites that are under private ownership. To support these goals, it has been necessary to develop planning approaches, high-resolution spatial datasets, and conservation practice assessment tools that will allow the agricultural and conservation communities to characterize and mitigate these challenges. The field boundary dataset represents a spatial framework for assembling and maintaining geospatial data to support conservation planning at the scale where conservation practices are implemented. This field boundaries dataset has been assembled to support field-scale agricultural conservation planning using the USDA/ARS Agricultural Conservation Planning Framework (ACPF). The original data used to create this database are the pre-2008 Farm Bill FSA common land unit (CLU) datasets. A portion of metadata found herein pertains to the USDA FSA CLU. The remaining information has been developed to reflect the repurposing of the data in its aggregated form. It is important to note that all USDA programmatic and ownership information that was associated with the original data have been removed. Beyond that, these data has been extensively edited to reflect crop-specific land use consistent with 2009 land cover as derived from 2009 NASS Crop Data Layer datasets and 2009 aerial photography, and no longer reflects discrete ownership patterns. Resources in this dataset:Resource Title: Agricultural land use by field: Iowa 2010-2019. File Name: IA_ACPFfields2019.zipResource Description: This field boundaries dataset has been assembled to support field-scale agricultural conservation planning using the USDA/ARS Agricultural Conservation Planning Framework (ACPF). Resource Software Recommended: ArcGIS,url: https://www.esri.com Resource Title: Iowa ACPF Crop History 2010-2019. File Name: IA_ACPFfields_CropHistory2010_2019.pdfResource Description: Iowa ACPF Crop History 2010-2019Resource Title: Iowa ACPF Land Use 2014-2019. File Name: IA_ACPFfields_LandUse2014_2019.pdfResource Description: Iowa ACPF Land Use 2014-2019Resource Title: Iowa Field Boundaries 2019. File Name: IA_ACPF_fieldBoundaries_2019.pdfResource Description: Iowa Field Boundaries 2019
Facebook
TwitterU.S. Government Workshttps://www.usa.gov/government-works
License information was derived automatically
The measured and simulated data for corn and soybean yields, tileflow, N concentration, and N loading by plot, year, treatment, rotation, tillage and N application from 36 1-acre plots located on the Northeast Research and Demonstration Farm near Nashua, Iowa are presented. The measured data were analyzed with the Root Zone Water Quality Model (RZWQM) Version 1.0.2000.830 and summarized in 8 papers in a special issue of Geoderma (Volume 140, No. 3, pages 217-322). The economic returns associated with each plot year were budgeted using the EconDocs software, since improved and released as DevTreks. Resources in this dataset:Resource Title: Nashua Data Access . File Name: Web Page, url: https://apps.tucson.ars.ag.gov/nashua/ Web site for the Nashua Project, including links to :
graphical presentation of the measured data climate data official soil series information about the Clyde, Floyd, Kenyon, and Readlyn soils interactive Access database of the measured and simulated results spreadsheet detailing all of the operations used on the research plots graphical summary of the simulated vs measured results for corn and soybean yields, tileflow, N concentration, and N loading by plot, year, treatment, rotation, tillage and N application method listing of the RZWQM input files for each plot in each year information on the RZWQM model and its applications spreadsheet detailing all of the costs and returns DevTreks software bibliography of water quality papers based on the Nashua site
Facebook
TwitterFour-year rainfed corn field experiment in Ames, Iowa. This dataset is part of an Agricultural Model Intercomparison and Improvement Project (AgMIP) data node maintained at National Agricultural Library for USDA-AgMIP data. Resources in this dataset:Resource Title: Corn Dataset. File Name: agmip_download.zipResource Description: Direct download, zipped aceb data format file at https://api.agmip.org/cropsitedb/2/dataset/53616eb8-df80-45dd-9c45-d7d81b8e1181
Facebook
TwitterFinancial overview and grant giving statistics of Iowa Agricultural Mitigation Inc
Facebook
TwitterFinancial overview and grant giving statistics of Southeast Iowa Agricultural Research Association
Facebook
TwitterFinancial overview and grant giving statistics of Northeast Iowa Agricultural Experimental Association
Facebook
TwitterBruner Farm Study for Resilient Economic Agricultural Practices in Ames, Iowa Soil P analyzed by Bray P extractant. Soil K analyzed by Ammonium Acetate extractant. For MeasSoilCover estimates: Photos were taken with a Canon, 12.3 megapixel EOS Rebel T3 mounted on a Van-Guard QS-46 large format quick shoe. The monopod that the amera/shoe assembly was attached to is a Wooster Sherlock model R056 telescoping pole. A mounting racket and spirit level (part #’s MSRMB and MSRSLA respectively, available from Cropscan inc. http://www.cropscan.com/mpscs.html) were attached to the pole in a manner so that when the camera is mounted, and the bubble in the spirit level is centered, then the focal plane of the camera is perpendicular to the ground resulting in a nadir image of the ground beneath the camera. The fully extended pole camera assembly was carried diagonally across each plot in field 70/71 an East to West or West to East transect with photos being taken every 9 paces. The unit was angled in such a way that the shadow from the pole and camera was not included in the photo. In the larger plots at the Uthe farm and the Poets facility, 30 to 40 paces were taken between each photo. The self timer on the camera was set for a 10 second delay and the camera was focused before initiating the timer. In most instances, 10 seconds was ample time to maneuver the camera into position for the photo. The cameras motion stabilizer function was turned on and the18mm zoom setting was always used to capture the maximum amount of area in each photo. Cold days, and wind speeds in excess of 30mph present a challenge. Photos were downloaded from the camera with the EOS utility software supplied with the camera and analyzed with sample point version 1.51 with a grid size of 10x10 chosen. A newer version of sample point is available at http://www.samplepoint.org/.
Facebook
TwitterThis dataset includes number of projects, tax credit amount and loan amount for Beginning Farmer Tax Credit Program and Loan Program in FY17 and FY18 break down by County.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://fred.stlouisfed.org/legal/#copyright-public-domainhttps://fred.stlouisfed.org/legal/#copyright-public-domain
Graph and download economic data for Proprietors' Farm Income in Iowa (IAOFAR) from Q1 1948 to Q2 2025 about proprietors, IA, agriculture, income, and USA.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://fred.stlouisfed.org/legal/#copyright-public-domainhttps://fred.stlouisfed.org/legal/#copyright-public-domain
Graph and download economic data for Gross Domestic Product: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting (11) in Iowa (IAAGRNQGSP) from Q1 2005 to Q2 2025 about hunting, forestry, fishing, IA, agriculture, GSP, private industries, private, industry, GDP, and USA.
Facebook
TwitterNotice to Data Users: The documentation for this data set was provided solely by the Principal Investigator(s) and was not further developed, thoroughly reviewed, or edited by NSIDC. Thus, support for this data set may be limited.This data set contains land use classification data for the Walnut Creek watershed area of Ames, Iowa USA. For the Ames study region, the National Agricultural Statistical Service (NASS) Land Cover Estimate was used to represent land cover classes.
Facebook
TwitterThis dataset includes soil health, crop biomass, and crop yield data for a 13-year corn stover harvest trial in central Iowa. Following the release in 2005 of the Billion Ton Study assessment of biofuel sources, several soil health assessments associated with harvesting corn stover were initiated across ARS locations to help provide industry guidelines for sustainable stover harvest. This dataset is from a trial conducted by the National Laboratory for Agriculture and Environment from 2007-2021 at the Iowa State University Ag Engineering and Agronomy farm. Management factors evaluated in the trial included the following. Stover harvest rate at three levels: No, moderate (3.5 ± 1.1 Mg ha-1 yr-1), or high (5.0 ± 1.7 Mg ha-1 yr-1) stover harvest rates. No-till versus chisel-plow tillage. Originally, the 3 stover harvest rates were evaluated in a complete factorial design with tillage system. However, the no-till, no-harvest system performed poorly in continuous corn and was discontinued in 2012 due to lack of producer interest. Cropping sequence. In addition to evaluating continuous corn for all stover harvest rates and tillage systems, a corn-alfalfa rotation, and a corn-soybean-wheat rotation with winter cover crops were evaluated in a subset of the tillage and stover harvest rate treatments. One-time additions of biochar in 2013 at rates of either 9 Mg/ha or 30 Mg/ha were evaluated in a continuous corn cropping system. The dataset includes: 1) Crop biomass and yields for all crop phases in every year. 2) Soil organic carbon, total carbon, total nitrogen, and pH to 120 cm depth in 2012, 2016, and 2017. Soil cores from 2005 (pre-study) were also sampled to 90 cm depth. 3) Soil chemistry sampled to 15 cm depth every 1-2 years from 2007 to 2017. 4) Soil strength and compaction was assessed to 60 cm depth in April 2021. These data have been presented in several manuscripts, including Phillips et al. (in review), O'Brien et al. (2020), and Obrycki et al. (2018). Resources in this dataset:Resource Title: R Script for Phillips et al. 2022. File Name: Field 70-71 Analysis Script_AgDataCommons.RResource Description: This R script includes analysis and figures for Phillips et al. "Thirteen-year Stover Harvest and Tillage Effects on Soil Compaction in Iowa". It focuses primarily on the soil compaction and strength data found in "Field 70-71 ConeIndex_BulkDensityDepths_2021". It also includes analysis of corn yields from "Field 70-71 CornYield_2008-2021" and weather conditions from "PRISM_MayTemps" and "Rainfall_AEA".Resource Software Recommended: R version 4.1.3 or higher,url: https://cran.r-project.org/bin/windows/base/ Resource Title: Field 70-71 ConeIndex_BulkDensityDepths_2021. File Name: Field 70-71 ConeIndex_BulkDensityDepths_2021.csvResource Description: This dataset provides an assessment of soil strength (penetration resistance) and soil compaction (bulk density) to 60 cm depth, in continuous corn plots. Penetration resistance was measured in most-trafficked and least-trafficked areas of the plots to assess compaction from increased traffic associated with stover harvest. This spreadsheet also has associated data, including soil water, carbon, and organic matter content. Data were collected in April 2021 and are described in Phillips et al. (in review, 2022).Resource Title: Field 70-71 CornYield_2008-2021. File Name: Field 70-71 CornYield_2008-2021_ForR.csvResource Description: This dataset provides corn stover biomass and grain yields from 2008-2021. Note that this dataset is just for corn, which were presented in Phillips et al., 2022. Yields for all crop phases, including soybeans, wheat, alfalfa, and winter cover crops, are in the file "Field 70-71 Crop Yield File 2008-2020".Resource Title: PRISM_MayTemps. File Name: PRISM_MayTemps.csvResource Description: Average May temperatures during the study period, obtained from interpolation of regional weather stations using the PRISM climate model (https://prism.oregonstate.edu/). These data were used to evaluate how spring temperatures may have impacted corn establishment.Resource Title: Rainfall_AEA. File Name: Rainfall_AEA.csvResource Description: Daily rainfall for the study location, 2008-2021. Data were obtained from the Iowa Environmental Mesonet (https://mesonet.agron.iastate.edu/rainfall/). Title: Field 70-71 Plot Status 2007-2021. File Name: Field 70-71 Plot Status 2007-2021.xlsxResource Description: This file contains descriptions of experimental treatments and diagrams of plot layouts as they were modified through several phases of the trial. Also includes an image of plot locations relative to NRCS soil survey map units.Resource Title: Field 70-71 Deep Soil Cores 2012-2017. File Name: Field 70-71 Deep Soil Cores 2012-2017.xlsxResource Description: Soil carbon, nitrogen, organic matter, and pH to 120 cm depth in 2012, 2016, and 2017.Resource Title: Field 70-71 Baseline Deep Soil Cores 2005. File Name: Field 70-71 Baseline Deep Soil Cores 2005.csvResource Description: Baseline soil carbon, nitrogen, and pH data from an earlier trial in 2005, prior to stover trial establishment.Resource Title: Field 70-71 Crop Yield File 2008-2020. File Name: Field 70-71 Crop Yield File 2008-2020.xlsxResource Description: Yields for all crops in all cropping sequences, 2008-2020. Some of the crop sequences have not been summarized in publications.Resource Title: Field 70-71 Surface Soil Test Data 2007-2021. File Name: Field 70-71 Surface Soil Test Data 2007-2021.xlsxResource Description: Soil chemistry data, 0-15 cm, collect near-annually from 2007 to 2021. Most analyses were performed by Harris Laboratories (now AgSource) in Lincoln, Nebraska, USA. Resource Title: Iowa Stover Harvest Trial Data Dictionary. File Name: Field 70-71 Data Dictionary.xlsxResource Description: Data dictionary for all data files.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Comprehensive dataset containing 1 verified US Agricultural Research Services locations in Iowa, United States with complete contact information, ratings, reviews, and location data.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Comprehensive dataset containing 14 verified Agricultural association businesses in Iowa, United States with complete contact information, ratings, reviews, and location data.
Facebook
TwitterThis dataset contains model predictions of soil erosion and soil organic carbon (SOC) redistribution caused by agricultural practices such as tillage erosion. Soil erosion diminishes agricultural productivity by driving the loss of SOC. This model addresses a growing need to predict soil organic carbon transport, loss, and deposition. The model was applied to three sites containing paired prairie grassland and field plots in Iowa, and predicts SOC redistribution between 1859 to 2019. The model was developed by incorporating a SOC mixing model with a landscape evolution model that simulates tillage erosion.
Facebook
TwitterFinancial overview and grant giving statistics of Iowa State University Agricultural Endowment
Facebook
TwitterU.S. Government Workshttps://www.usa.gov/government-works
License information was derived automatically
This data release includes sampling location identification and timing data as well as plant and insect pollinator taxonomic information in Conservation Reserve Program fields. Sampling took place during July and August of 2019. Fields were located on private land managed for the U.S.Department of Agriculture Conservation Reserve Program in eastern central Iowa, U.S.A.
Facebook
TwitterCC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
License information was derived automatically
This is the dataset used in the BioScience publication of the same name. More information about this dataset: Interested parties can request data from the Critical Trends Assessment Program, which was the source for the data on natural areas in this study. More information on the program and data requests can be obtained by visiting the program webpage. Critical Trends Assessment Program, Illinois Natural History Survey. http://wwx.inhs.illinois.edu/research/ctap/ These spatial datasets were used for analyses: Illinois Natural History Survey. 2003. Illinois GAP analysis land cover classification 1999-2000, 1:100 000 Scale, Raster Digital Data, Version 2.0. Champaign, IL, USA. Illinois State Geological Survey. 1995. Illinois Landcover Thematic Map Coverage Map 1991-1995. Champaign, IL, USA. Illinois State Geological Survey. 2001. Illinois Landcover Thematic Map Coverage Map 1999-2000. Champaign, IL, USA. USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service Cropland Data Layer. 1999-2015. Published crop-specific data layer [Online]. Available at https://nassgeodata.gmu.edu/CropScape/. USDA-NASS, Washington, DC. Information on agricultural practices and landcover changes were derived from the following U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) resources: USDA Economic Research Service. 2016. Adoption of Genetically Engineered Crops in the U.S. Available at http://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/. USDA-ERS, Washington, DC. USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2015. Summary Report: 2012 National Resources Inventory. https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcseprd396218.pdf. USDA-NRCS, Washington, DC, and Center for Survey Statistics and Methodology, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa.
Facebook
TwitterThis dataset contains daily estimates of carbon fluxes in croplands derived from the "ecosys" model covering a portion of the Midwestern US (Illinois, Indiana, and Iowa) at county-level resolution from 2001-2018. Ecosys simulates water, energy, carbon, and nutrient cycles simultaneously for various ecosystems, including agricultural systems at up to hourly resolution. Estimates include: gross primary productivity (GPP), net primary productivity (NPP), autotrophic respiration (Ra), heterotrophic respiration (Rh), or net ecosystem exchange (NEE). Data were generated by the ecosys model constrained by observational data, including USDA crop yield from USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service, and a remote-sensing-based SLOPE GPP product. Model performance was evaluated using observations from AmeriFlux towers at agricultural sites within the study area. Agriculture in the US Midwest produces significant quantities of corn and soybeans, which are key elements to the global food supply. The data are provided in shapefile format.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://fred.stlouisfed.org/legal/#copyright-public-domainhttps://fred.stlouisfed.org/legal/#copyright-public-domain
Graph and download economic data for Gross Domestic Product: Farms (111-112) in Iowa (IAFARMNGSP) from 1997 to 2024 about hunting, forestry, fishing, IA, agriculture, GSP, private industries, private, industry, GDP, and USA.
Facebook
TwitterImproving the quality of water discharged from agricultural watersheds requires comprehensive and adaptive approaches for planning and implementing conservation practices. These measures will need to consider landscape hydrology, distributions of soil types, land cover, and crop distributions in an integrated manner. The two most consistent challenges to these efforts will be consistency and reliability of data, and the capacity to translate conservation planning from watershed to farm and field scales. The translation of scale is required because, while conservation practices can be planned based on a watershed scale framework, they must be implemented by landowners in specific fields and riparian sites that are under private ownership. To support these goals, it has been necessary to develop planning approaches, high-resolution spatial datasets, and conservation practice assessment tools that will allow the agricultural and conservation communities to characterize and mitigate these challenges. The field boundary dataset represents a spatial framework for assembling and maintaining geospatial data to support conservation planning at the scale where conservation practices are implemented. This field boundaries dataset has been assembled to support field-scale agricultural conservation planning using the USDA/ARS Agricultural Conservation Planning Framework (ACPF). The original data used to create this database are the pre-2008 Farm Bill FSA common land unit (CLU) datasets. A portion of metadata found herein pertains to the USDA FSA CLU. The remaining information has been developed to reflect the repurposing of the data in its aggregated form. It is important to note that all USDA programmatic and ownership information that was associated with the original data have been removed. Beyond that, these data has been extensively edited to reflect crop-specific land use consistent with 2009 land cover as derived from 2009 NASS Crop Data Layer datasets and 2009 aerial photography, and no longer reflects discrete ownership patterns. Resources in this dataset:Resource Title: Agricultural land use by field: Iowa 2010-2019. File Name: IA_ACPFfields2019.zipResource Description: This field boundaries dataset has been assembled to support field-scale agricultural conservation planning using the USDA/ARS Agricultural Conservation Planning Framework (ACPF). Resource Software Recommended: ArcGIS,url: https://www.esri.com Resource Title: Iowa ACPF Crop History 2010-2019. File Name: IA_ACPFfields_CropHistory2010_2019.pdfResource Description: Iowa ACPF Crop History 2010-2019Resource Title: Iowa ACPF Land Use 2014-2019. File Name: IA_ACPFfields_LandUse2014_2019.pdfResource Description: Iowa ACPF Land Use 2014-2019Resource Title: Iowa Field Boundaries 2019. File Name: IA_ACPF_fieldBoundaries_2019.pdfResource Description: Iowa Field Boundaries 2019