Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Comprehensive dataset containing 51 verified ATM ES Reliable locations in United States with complete contact information, ratings, reviews, and location data.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Comprehensive dataset containing 2 verified Reliable Services locations in California, United States with complete contact information, ratings, reviews, and location data.
Yearly data of Quality Review ratings from 2005 to 2017
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Context
The dataset tabulates the Good Hope population distribution across 18 age groups. It lists the population in each age group along with the percentage population relative of the total population for Good Hope. The dataset can be utilized to understand the population distribution of Good Hope by age. For example, using this dataset, we can identify the largest age group in Good Hope.
Key observations
The largest age group in Good Hope, IL was for the group of age 20 to 24 years years with a population of 37 (8.89%), according to the ACS 2018-2022 5-Year Estimates. At the same time, the smallest age group in Good Hope, IL was the 75 to 79 years years with a population of 9 (2.16%). Source: U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2018-2022 5-Year Estimates
When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2018-2022 5-Year Estimates
Age groups:
Variables / Data Columns
Good to know
Margin of Error
Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.
Custom data
If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.
Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.
This dataset is a part of the main dataset for Good Hope Population by Age. You can refer the same here
Affordable, clean, and secure energy and energy services are essential for improving U.S. economic productivity, enhancing our quality of life, protecting our environment, and ensuring our Nation's security. To help the federal government meet these energy goals, President Obama issued a Presidential Memorandum on January 9 directing the administration to conduct a Quadrennial Energy Review (QER). As described in the President’s Climate Action Plan, this first-ever review will focus on energy infrastructure and will identify the threats, risks, and opportunities for U.S. energy and climate security, enabling the federal government to translate policy goals into a set of integrated actions. The Presidential Memorandum created an interagency task force co-chaired by the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy and the Special Assistant to the President for Energy and Climate Change. The Department of Energy will help coordinate interagency activities and provide policy analysis and modeling, and stakeholder engagement.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Context
The dataset tabulates the Good Thunder population distribution across 18 age groups. It lists the population in each age group along with the percentage population relative of the total population for Good Thunder. The dataset can be utilized to understand the population distribution of Good Thunder by age. For example, using this dataset, we can identify the largest age group in Good Thunder.
Key observations
The largest age group in Good Thunder, MN was for the group of age 55 to 59 years years with a population of 86 (20.33%), according to the ACS 2019-2023 5-Year Estimates. At the same time, the smallest age group in Good Thunder, MN was the 80 to 84 years years with a population of 2 (0.47%). Source: U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2019-2023 5-Year Estimates
When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2019-2023 5-Year Estimates
Age groups:
Variables / Data Columns
Good to know
Margin of Error
Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.
Custom data
If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.
Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.
This dataset is a part of the main dataset for Good Thunder Population by Age. You can refer the same here
Xtract.io’s Walmart & Sam’s Club Location Data provides complete coverage of one of the largest retail networks in North America. This retail POI dataset includes precise geocoded coordinates and warehouse locations, enabling detailed market analysis, site selection, supply chain planning, and competitive benchmarking.
Retail investors, analysts, and researchers can use this dataset to:
Assess market penetration and retail density.
Identify expansion opportunities for new stores or distribution centers.
Benchmark against competitors in the retail sector.
Understand consumer behavior and catchment areas.
As part of LocationsXYZ, Xtract.io’s POI data platform, this dataset is supported by a repository of over 6 million POIs across the US, UK, and Canada, spanning various industries, including retail, restaurants, healthcare, automotive, and public utilities.
Why Choose LocationsXYZ?
95% accuracy across store and warehouse locations.
Regular refresh cycles (30, 60, or 90 days).
On-demand attributes tailored to your retail use case.
Handcrafted boundaries (polygons) for precise spatial analysis.
Multiple formats for seamless integration into GIS, BI, and analytics platforms.
Unlock the Power of Retail Location Data
With our Walmart and Sam’s Club dataset, businesses can:
Conduct thorough market and competitor analyses.
Optimize supply chain routes and warehouse planning.
Support real estate and site selection decisions.
Gain a competitive advantage with location-driven retail intelligence.
LocationsXYZ has empowered enterprises with geospatial insights to expand, compete, and grow confidently. Unlock the potential of retail POI data with Walmart and Sam’s Club coverage across the US and Canada.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Comprehensive dataset containing 50 verified B.GOOD locations in United States with complete contact information, ratings, reviews, and location data.
US B2B Contact Database | 200M+ Verified Records | 95% Accuracy | API/CSV/JSON Elevate your sales and marketing efforts with America's most comprehensive B2B contact data, featuring over 200M+ verified records of decision-makers, from CEOs to managers, across all industries. Powered by AI and refreshed bi-weekly, this dataset ensures you have access to the freshest, most accurate contact details available for effective outreach and engagement.
Key Features & Stats:
200M+ Decision-Makers: Includes C-level executives, VPs, Directors, and Managers.
95% Accuracy: Email & Phone numbers verified for maximum deliverability.
Bi-Weekly Updates: Never waste time on outdated leads with our frequent data refreshes.
50+ Data Points: Comprehensive firmographic, technographic, and contact details.
Core Fields:
Direct Work Emails & Personal Emails for effective outreach.
Mobile Phone Numbers for cold calls and SMS campaigns.
Full Name, Job Title, Seniority for better personalization.
Company Insights: Size, Revenue, Funding data, Industry, and Tech Stack for a complete profile.
Location: HQ and regional offices to target local, national, or international markets.
Top Use Cases:
Cold Email & Calling Campaigns: Target the right people with accurate contact data.
CRM & Marketing Automation Enrichment: Enhance your CRM with enriched data for better lead management.
ABM & Sales Intelligence: Target the right decision-makers and personalize your approach.
Recruiting & Talent Mapping: Access CEO and senior leadership data for executive search.
Instant Delivery Options:
JSON – Bulk downloads via S3 for easy integration.
REST API – Real-time integration for seamless workflow automation.
CRM Sync – Direct integration with your CRM for streamlined lead management.
Enterprise-Grade Quality:
SOC 2 Compliant: Ensuring the highest standards of security and data privacy.
GDPR/CCPA Ready: Fully compliant with global data protection regulations.
Triple-Verification Process: Ensuring the accuracy and deliverability of every record.
Suppression List Management: Eliminate irrelevant or non-opt-in contacts from your outreach.
US Business Contacts | B2B Email Database | Sales Leads | CRM Enrichment | Verified Phone Numbers | ABM Data | CEO Contact Data | US B2B Leads | US prospects data
Apache License, v2.0https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
License information was derived automatically
Introduction
This dataset is the largest real-world consistency-ensured dataset for peer review, which features the widest range of conferences and the most complete review stages, including initial submissions, reviews, ratings and confidence, aspect ratings, rebuttals, discussions, score changes, meta-reviews, and final decisions.
Comparison with Existing Datasets
The comparison between our proposed dataset and existing peer review datasets is given below. Only the… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/Daoze/ReviewRebuttal.
https://www.technavio.com/content/privacy-noticehttps://www.technavio.com/content/privacy-notice
Analytical Standards Market Size 2025-2029
The analytical standards market size is valued to increase by USD 734.1 million, at a CAGR of 7.1% from 2024 to 2029. Rapid growth in life science industry will drive the analytical standards market.
Market Insights
North America dominated the market and accounted for a 50% growth during the 2025-2029.
By Type - Chromatography segment was valued at USD 509.10 million in 2023
By Application - Food and beverages segment accounted for the largest market revenue share in 2023
Market Size & Forecast
Market Opportunities: USD 63.57 million
Market Future Opportunities 2024: USD 734.10 million
CAGR from 2024 to 2029 : 7.1%
Market Summary
The market is experiencing significant growth, driven primarily by the expanding life sciences industry. These standards play a crucial role in ensuring the accuracy and consistency of analytical results, making them indispensable in various sectors such as pharmaceuticals, food and beverage, and environmental testing. The increasing adoption of customized analytical standards caters to the unique requirements of specific applications, further fueling market expansion. However, the market faces challenges, including the limited shelf life of analytical standards, which necessitates frequent replenishment. In a real-world business scenario, a global supply chain for a pharmaceutical company relies on a steady supply of analytical standards to maintain operational efficiency and ensure compliance with regulatory standards.
Ensuring a consistent supply of high-quality standards is essential for the company's success, as any deviation could lead to costly delays or even product recalls. To address these challenges, market participants focus on innovation, such as developing stable, long-lasting standards, and improving supply chain management strategies.
What will be the size of the Analytical Standards Market during the forecast period?
Get Key Insights on Market Forecast (PDF) Request Free Sample
The market is a dynamic and ever-evolving industry, driven by the increasing demand for accurate and reliable data in various sectors. According to recent studies, the market is witnessing significant growth, with an estimated 12% increase in demand for analytical standards in the pharmaceutical industry alone. This trend is attributed to the stringent regulatory requirements and the need for compliance with Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) and Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) guidelines. Moreover, the adoption of advanced technologies such as data management systems, precision limits, and calibration intervals, is transforming the way analytical standards are used in laboratories. For instance, virtual assistants and automation tools are increasingly being used to streamline analytical workflows and improve system performance.
The integration of statistical software and data analysis tools is also enabling more efficient data management and risk assessment procedures. In addition, method comparison studies and performance verification are crucial for ensuring accuracy and reducing measurement error. ISO standards and quality system elements are essential for maintaining data integrity and ensuring that analytical results meet the required accuracy criteria. Instrument maintenance and quality assurance are also critical for ensuring the reliability and consistency of analytical results. Overall, the market is poised for continued growth, driven by the need for accurate and reliable data in various industries, and the increasing adoption of advanced technologies to improve analytical workflows and ensure regulatory compliance.
Unpacking the Analytical Standards Market Landscape
In the realm of business operations, precision measurement plays a pivotal role in ensuring consistency and accuracy. The adoption of validation protocols and reference materials has led to a significant reduction in errors, with a reported 30% decrease in system suitability testing failures. Quality control metrics, such as precision evaluation and error analysis, have been instrumental in enhancing regulatory compliance and aligning with quality management systems. Laboratories employing calibration procedures and traceability standards have demonstrated a 25% improvement in instrument performance, leading to substantial cost savings. Analytical techniques, statistical process control, and performance indicators are integral to data integrity management and audit trails, enabling method validation studies and sample preparation methods to yield reliable results. Instrument calibration, method development, and documentation control are essential components of quality assurance systems, ensuring the accuracy of data processing software and uncertainty estimation. Ultimately, these practices contribute to the reproducibility of results and the effectiveness of quality control chart
Subscribers can find out export and import data of 23 countries by HS code or product’s name. This demo is helpful for market analysis.
https://www.ibisworld.com/about/termsofuse/https://www.ibisworld.com/about/termsofuse/
Clinical trial data management (CDM) providers have experienced robust growth in recent years, driven by several key factors. Two major catalysts contributing to this growth are an increasing demand for innovative therapies and treatments and the rising prevalence of chronic diseases worldwide. As pharmaceutical companies race to develop new drugs and biologics to address unmet medical needs, the volume and complexity of clinical trials have surged. A jump in clinical trial activity has fueled the need for efficient and reliable data management solutions to handle the vast amounts of data generated throughout the drug development process. At the same time, regulatory bodies in the US and internationally mounting scrutiny of clinical trial data integrity has prompted pharmaceutical companies to outsource data management to compliance and transparency. In all, revenue has been expanding at a CAGR of 5.9% to an estimated $8.9 billion over the past five years, including expected growth of 2.7% in 2024. One central trend behind clinical trial data management providers’ growth is the increasingly complex clinical trial landscape. Medical and tech advances have made the clinical trial process more intricate, expanding the volume and variety of data collected during clinical trials, introducing significant challenges for data management. Clinical trial data management companies have developed an increasingly vital role in addressing these challenges by providing specialized services. Outsourcing data management has been especially crucial for smaller biopharmaceutical companies that depend heavily on successful clinical trials but lack the capital or resources to invest in in-house capabilities. Outsourcing aspects of the research and development stage, including clinical trial data management, will become an increasingly attractive option for downstream pharmaceutical and medical device manufacturers, positioning the industry for growth. Competition between smaller or mid-sized pharma and the leading multinational manufacturers to bring novel therapies to market will strengthen CDM companies’ role. An approaching patent cliff will also drive demand for clinical trial data management services as revenue declines and heightened competition from generic drugs accelerate clinical trial activity and cost mitigation efforts. Revenue will continue growing, rising at a CAGR of 3.3% over the next five years, reaching an estimated $10.5 billion in 2029.
The USGS Protected Areas Database of the United States (PAD-US) is the nation's inventory of protected areas, including public land and voluntarily provided private protected areas, identified as an A-16 National Geospatial Data Asset in the Cadastre Theme ( https://communities.geoplatform.gov/ngda-cadastre/ ). The PAD-US is an ongoing project with several published versions of a spatial database including areas dedicated to the preservation of biological diversity, and other natural (including extraction), recreational, or cultural uses, managed for these purposes through legal or other effective means. The database was originally designed to support biodiversity assessments; however, its scope expanded in recent years to include all open space public and nonprofit lands and waters. Most are public lands owned in fee (the owner of the property has full and irrevocable ownership of the land); however, permanent and long-term easements, leases, agreements, Congressional (e.g. 'Wilderness Area'), Executive (e.g. 'National Monument'), and administrative designations (e.g. 'Area of Critical Environmental Concern') documented in agency management plans are also included. The PAD-US strives to be a complete inventory of U.S. public land and other protected areas, compiling “best available” data provided by managing agencies and organizations. The PAD-US geodatabase maps and describes areas using thirty-six attributes and five separate feature classes representing the U.S. protected areas network: Fee (ownership parcels), Designation, Easement, Marine, Proclamation and Other Planning Boundaries. An additional Combined feature class includes the full PAD-US inventory to support data management, queries, web mapping services, and analyses. The Feature Class (FeatClass) field in the Combined layer allows users to extract data types as needed. A Federal Data Reference file geodatabase lookup table (PADUS3_0Combined_Federal_Data_References) facilitates the extraction of authoritative federal data provided or recommended by managing agencies from the Combined PAD-US inventory. This PAD-US Version 3.0 dataset includes a variety of updates from the previous Version 2.1 dataset (USGS, 2020, https://doi.org/10.5066/P92QM3NT ), achieving goals to: 1) Annually update and improve spatial data representing the federal estate for PAD-US applications; 2) Update state and local lands data as state data-steward and PAD-US Team resources allow; and 3) Automate data translation efforts to increase PAD-US update efficiency. The following list summarizes the integration of "best available" spatial data to ensure public lands and other protected areas from all jurisdictions are represented in the PAD-US (other data were transferred from PAD-US 2.1). Federal updates - The USGS remains committed to updating federal fee owned lands data and major designation changes in annual PAD-US updates, where authoritative data provided directly by managing agencies are available or alternative data sources are recommended. The following is a list of updates or revisions associated with the federal estate: 1) Major update of the Federal estate (fee ownership parcels, easement interest, and management designations where available), including authoritative data from 8 agencies: Bureau of Land Management (BLM), U.S. Census Bureau (Census Bureau), Department of Defense (DOD), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), National Park Service (NPS), Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), U.S. Forest Service (USFS), and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). The federal theme in PAD-US is developed in close collaboration with the Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC) Federal Lands Working Group (FLWG, https://communities.geoplatform.gov/ngda-govunits/federal-lands-workgroup/ ). 2) Improved the representation (boundaries and attributes) of the National Park Service, U.S. Forest Service, Bureau of Land Management, and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service lands, in collaboration with agency data-stewards, in response to feedback from the PAD-US Team and stakeholders. 3) Added a Federal Data Reference file geodatabase lookup table (PADUS3_0Combined_Federal_Data_References) to the PAD-US 3.0 geodatabase to facilitate the extraction (by Data Provider, Dataset Name, and/or Aggregator Source) of authoritative data provided directly (or recommended) by federal managing agencies from the full PAD-US inventory. A summary of the number of records (Frequency) and calculated GIS Acres (vs Documented Acres) associated with features provided by each Aggregator Source is included; however, the number of records may vary from source data as the "State Name" standard is applied to national files. The Feature Class (FeatClass) field in the table and geodatabase describe the data type to highlight overlapping features in the full inventory (e.g. Designation features often overlap Fee features) and to assist users in building queries for applications as needed. 4) Scripted the translation of the Department of Defense, Census Bureau, and Natural Resource Conservation Service source data into the PAD-US format to increase update efficiency. 5) Revised conservation measures (GAP Status Code, IUCN Category) to more accurately represent protected and conserved areas. For example, Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) Waterfowl Production Area Wetland Easements changed from GAP Status Code 2 to 4 as spatial data currently represents the complete parcel (about 10.54 million acres primarily in North Dakota and South Dakota). Only aliquot parts of these parcels are documented under wetland easement (1.64 million acres). These acreages are provided by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and are referenced in the PAD-US geodatabase Easement feature class 'Comments' field. State updates - The USGS is committed to building capacity in the state data-steward network and the PAD-US Team to increase the frequency of state land updates, as resources allow. The USGS supported efforts to significantly increase state inventory completeness with the integration of local parks data in the PAD-US 2.1, and developed a state-to-PAD-US data translation script during PAD-US 3.0 development to pilot in future updates. Additional efforts are in progress to support the technical and organizational strategies needed to increase the frequency of state updates. The PAD-US 3.0 included major updates to the following three states: 1) California - added or updated state, regional, local, and nonprofit lands data from the California Protected Areas Database (CPAD), managed by GreenInfo Network, and integrated conservation and recreation measure changes following review coordinated by the data-steward with state managing agencies. Developed a data translation Python script (see Process Step 2 Source Data Documentation) in collaboration with the data-steward to increase the accuracy and efficiency of future PAD-US updates from CPAD. 2) Virginia - added or updated state, local, and nonprofit protected areas data (and removed legacy data) from the Virginia Conservation Lands Database, provided by the Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation's Natural Heritage Program, and integrated conservation and recreation measure changes following review by the data-steward. 3) West Virginia - added or updated state, local, and nonprofit protected areas data provided by the West Virginia University, GIS Technical Center. For more information regarding the PAD-US dataset please visit, https://www.usgs.gov/gapanalysis/PAD-US/. For more information about data aggregation please review the PAD-US Data Manual available at https://www.usgs.gov/core-science-systems/science-analytics-and-synthesis/gap/pad-us-data-manual . A version history of PAD-US updates is summarized below (See https://www.usgs.gov/core-science-systems/science-analytics-and-synthesis/gap/pad-us-data-history for more information): 1) First posted - April 2009 (Version 1.0 - available from the PAD-US: Team pad-us@usgs.gov). 2) Revised - May 2010 (Version 1.1 - available from the PAD-US: Team pad-us@usgs.gov). 3) Revised - April 2011 (Version 1.2 - available from the PAD-US: Team pad-us@usgs.gov). 4) Revised - November 2012 (Version 1.3) https://doi.org/10.5066/F79Z92XD 5) Revised - May 2016 (Version 1.4) https://doi.org/10.5066/F7G73BSZ 6) Revised - September 2018 (Version 2.0) https://doi.org/10.5066/P955KPLE 7) Revised - September 2020 (Version 2.1) https://doi.org/10.5066/P92QM3NT 8) Revised - January 2022 (Version 3.0) https://doi.org/10.5066/P9Q9LQ4B Comparing protected area trends between PAD-US versions is not recommended without consultation with USGS as many changes reflect improvements to agency and organization GIS systems, or conservation and recreation measure classification, rather than actual changes in protected area acquisition on the ground.
https://choosealicense.com/licenses/other/https://choosealicense.com/licenses/other/
Amazon Review Description Dataset
This dataset contains Amazon reviews from January 1, 2018, to June 30, 2018. It includes 2,245 sequences with 127,054 events across 18 category types. The original data is available at Amazon Review Data with citation information provided on the page. The detailed data preprocessing steps used to create this dataset can be found in the TPP-LLM paper and TPP-LLM-Embedding paper. If you find this dataset useful, we kindly invite you to cite the… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/tppllm/amazon-review-description.
https://www.usa.gov/government-workshttps://www.usa.gov/government-works
All data presented in this financial and traffic review of passenger U.S. National Air Carriers (“Nationals”) are derived from Form 41 Schedules reported to the U.S. Department of Transportation by Large Certificated Air Carriers.
The data are presented on both a carrier group and an individual carrier basis, but the primary focus is on individual carrier system entity performance. Data are presented for the most recent quarterly period compared to the prior year’s quarter, as well as for the 12-month ended period for the five most recent quarters.
Carriers can move between groupings (e.g., Majors and Nationals) based on their annual revenue. Combining datasets of different grouping (e.g., Majors and Nationals) can result in duplications.
Air Carrier Group Definitions:
Nationals: Air carriers with annual operating revenues from $100,000,001 to $1,000,000,000
https://www.transportation.gov/policy/aviation-policy/airline-quarterly-financial-review
Access B2B Contact Data for North American Small Business Owners with Success.ai—your go-to provider for verified, high-quality business datasets. This dataset is tailored for businesses, agencies, and professionals seeking direct access to decision-makers within the small business ecosystem across North America. With over 170 million professional profiles, it’s an unparalleled resource for powering your marketing, sales, and lead generation efforts.
Key Features of the Dataset:
Verified Contact Details
Includes accurate and up-to-date email addresses and phone numbers to ensure you reach your targets reliably.
AI-validated for 99% accuracy, eliminating errors and reducing wasted efforts.
Detailed Professional Insights
Comprehensive data points include job titles, skills, work experience, and education to enable precise segmentation and targeting.
Enriched with insights into decision-making roles, helping you connect directly with small business owners, CEOs, and other key stakeholders.
Business-Specific Information
Covers essential details such as industry, company size, location, and more, enabling you to tailor your campaigns effectively. Ideal for profiling and understanding the unique needs of small businesses.
Continuously Updated Data
Our dataset is maintained and updated regularly to ensure relevance and accuracy in fast-changing market conditions. New business contacts are added frequently, helping you stay ahead of the competition.
Why Choose Success.ai?
At Success.ai, we understand the critical importance of high-quality data for your business success. Here’s why our dataset stands out:
Tailored for Small Business Engagement Focused specifically on North American small business owners, this dataset is an invaluable resource for building relationships with SMEs (Small and Medium Enterprises). Whether you’re targeting startups, local businesses, or established small enterprises, our dataset has you covered.
Comprehensive Coverage Across North America Spanning the United States, Canada, and Mexico, our dataset ensures wide-reaching access to verified small business contacts in the region.
Categories Tailored to Your Needs Includes highly relevant categories such as Small Business Contact Data, CEO Contact Data, B2B Contact Data, and Email Address Data to match your marketing and sales strategies.
Customizable and Flexible Choose from a wide range of filtering options to create datasets that meet your exact specifications, including filtering by industry, company size, geographic location, and more.
Best Price Guaranteed We pride ourselves on offering the most competitive rates without compromising on quality. When you partner with Success.ai, you receive superior data at the best value.
Seamless Integration Delivered in formats that integrate effortlessly with your CRM, marketing automation, or sales platforms, so you can start acting on the data immediately.
Use Cases: This dataset empowers you to:
Drive Sales Growth: Build and refine your sales pipeline by connecting directly with decision-makers in small businesses. Optimize Marketing Campaigns: Launch highly targeted email and phone outreach campaigns with verified contact data. Expand Your Network: Leverage the dataset to build relationships with small business owners and other key figures within the B2B landscape. Improve Data Accuracy: Enhance your existing databases with verified, enriched contact information, reducing bounce rates and increasing ROI. Industries Served: Whether you're in B2B SaaS, digital marketing, consulting, or any field requiring accurate and targeted contact data, this dataset serves industries of all kinds. It is especially useful for professionals focused on:
Lead Generation Business Development Market Research Sales Outreach Customer Acquisition What’s Included in the Dataset: Each profile provides:
Full Name Verified Email Address Phone Number (where available) Job Title Company Name Industry Company Size Location Skills and Professional Experience Education Background With over 170 million profiles, you can tap into a wealth of opportunities to expand your reach and grow your business.
Why High-Quality Contact Data Matters: Accurate, verified contact data is the foundation of any successful B2B strategy. Reaching small business owners and decision-makers directly ensures your message lands where it matters most, reducing costs and improving the effectiveness of your campaigns. By choosing Success.ai, you ensure that every contact in your pipeline is a genuine opportunity.
Partner with Success.ai for Better Data, Better Results: Success.ai is committed to delivering premium-quality B2B data solutions at scale. With our small business owner dataset, you can unlock the potential of North America's dynamic small business market.
Get Started Today Request a sample or customize your dataset to fit your unique...
The U.S. Census Bureau.s economic indicator surveys provide monthly and quarterly data that are timely, reliable, and offer comprehensive measures of the U.S. economy. These surveys produce a variety of statistics covering construction, housing, international trade, retail trade, wholesale trade, services and manufacturing. The survey data provide measures of economic activity that allow analysis of economic performance and inform business investment and policy decisions. Other data included, which are not considered principal economic indicators, are the Quarterly Summary of State & Local Taxes, Quarterly Survey of Public Pensions, and the Manufactured Homes Survey. For information on the reliability and use of the data, including important notes on estimation and sampling variance, seasonal adjustment, measures of sampling variability, and other information pertinent to the economic indicators, visit the individual programs' webpages - http://www.census.gov/cgi-bin/briefroom/BriefRm.
Subscribers can find out export and import data of 23 countries by HS code or product’s name. This demo is helpful for market analysis.
This Location Data & Foot traffic dataset available for all countries include enriched raw mobility data and visitation at POIs to answer questions such as:
-How often do people visit a location? (daily, monthly, absolute, and averages).
-What type of places do they visit ? (parks, schools, hospitals, etc)
-Which social characteristics do people have in a certain POI? - Breakdown by type: residents, workers, visitors.
-What's their mobility like enduring night hours & day hours?
-What's the frequency of the visits partition by day of the week and hour of the day?
Extra insights -Visitors´ relative income Level. -Visitors´ preferences as derived by their visits to shopping, parks, sports facilities, churches, among others.
Overview & Key Concepts Each record corresponds to a ping from a mobile device, at a particular moment in time and at a particular latitude and longitude. We procure this data from reliable technology partners, which obtain it through partnerships with location-aware apps. All the process is compliant with applicable privacy laws.
We clean and process these massive datasets with a number of complex, computer-intensive calculations to make them easier to use in different data science and machine learning applications, especially those related to understanding customer behavior.
Featured attributes of the data Device speed: based on the distance between each observation and the previous one, we estimate the speed at which the device is moving. This is particularly useful to differentiate between vehicles, pedestrians, and stationery observations.
Night base of the device: we calculate the approximated location of where the device spends the night, which is usually their home neighborhood.
Day base of the device: we calculate the most common daylight location during weekdays, which is usually their work location.
Income level: we use the night neighborhood of the device, and intersect it with available socioeconomic data, to infer the device’s income level. Depending on the country, and the availability of good census data, this figure ranges from a relative wealth index to a currency-calculated income.
POI visited: we intersect each observation with a number of POI databases, to estimate check-ins to different locations. POI databases can vary significantly, in scope and depth, between countries.
Category of visited POI: for each observation that can be attributable to a POI, we also include a standardized location category (park, hospital, among others). Coverage: Worldwide.
Delivery schemas We can deliver the data in three different formats:
Full dataset: one record per mobile ping. These datasets are very large, and should only be consumed by experienced teams with large computing budgets.
Visitation stream: one record per attributable visit. This dataset is considerably smaller than the full one but retains most of the more valuable elements in the dataset. This helps understand who visited a specific POI, characterize and understand the consumer's behavior.
Audience profiles: one record per mobile device in a given period of time (usually monthly). All the visitation stream is aggregated by category. This is the most condensed version of the dataset and is very useful to quickly understand the types of consumers in a particular area and to create cohorts of users.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Comprehensive dataset containing 51 verified ATM ES Reliable locations in United States with complete contact information, ratings, reviews, and location data.