Subscribers can find out export and import data of 23 countries by HS code or product’s name. This demo is helpful for market analysis.

According to a survey held among adults in the United States in February 2022, ABC and CBS were considered to be the most credible news sources in the country, with 61 percent of respondents believing the organizations to be very or somewhat credible. Sources which fared less well were MSNBC, Fox News, National Public Radio, and HuffPost, with less than 50 percent of adults agreeing that they found these to be reliable news outlets. The credibility of all the news sources in the ranking was higher in 2022 than in the previous year, though the figures in 2021 were particularly low.

Trust and bias in news Finding trustworthy, impartial news sources can be difficult for audiences in a world where fake news is in constant circulation and bias in news is a growing concern. More than 50 percent of total respondents to a survey held in early 2020 believed that there was a fair amount or great deal of bias in the news sources they used most often. The same study found that close to 70 percent of respondents were more concerned with bias in news that other people may consume than with their own news source.

A report exploring trust in news found that radio, network news, and newspapers were the most trusted news sources in the United States, whereas social media was not considered reliable in this regard. The lack of trust in news on social media has yet to affect consumption – social networks are the most used source of news among many consumers, particularly younger generations. In fact, some news consumers are moving away from official news platforms altogether and getting their updates from influencers rather than journalists.

Subscribers can find out export and import data of 23 countries by HS code or product’s name. This demo is helpful for market analysis.

About this dataset

Context

The dataset tabulates the Good Hope population distribution across 18 age groups. It lists the population in each age group along with the percentage population relative of the total population for Good Hope. The dataset can be utilized to understand the population distribution of Good Hope by age. For example, using this dataset, we can identify the largest age group in Good Hope.

Key observations

The largest age group in Good Hope, IL was for the group of age 20 to 24 years years with a population of 39 (9.82%), according to the ACS 2019-2023 5-Year Estimates. At the same time, the smallest age group in Good Hope, IL was the 70 to 74 years years with a population of 9 (2.27%). Source: U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2019-2023 5-Year Estimates

Content

When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2019-2023 5-Year Estimates

Age groups:

• Under 5 years
• 5 to 9 years
• 10 to 14 years
• 15 to 19 years
• 20 to 24 years
• 25 to 29 years
• 30 to 34 years
• 35 to 39 years
• 40 to 44 years
• 45 to 49 years
• 50 to 54 years
• 55 to 59 years
• 60 to 64 years
• 65 to 69 years
• 70 to 74 years
• 75 to 79 years
• 80 to 84 years
• 85 years and over

Variables / Data Columns

• Age Group: This column displays the age group in consideration
• Population: The population for the specific age group in the Good Hope is shown in this column.
• % of Total Population: This column displays the population of each age group as a proportion of Good Hope total population. Please note that the sum of all percentages may not equal one due to rounding of values.

Good to know

Margin of Error

Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.

Custom data

If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.

Inspiration

Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.

Recommended for further research

This dataset is a part of the main dataset for Good Hope Population by Age. You can refer the same here

Gain a Competitive Edge in the US Government Contracting Landscape with Cosmic Link Data

Empower your business development and government contracting efforts with Cosmic Link Data, the premier source for comprehensive and verified data on US government contractors.

What Makes Our Data Unique?

Verified & Up-to-Date: Our data undergoes rigorous verification processes, ensuring accuracy and reliability.

Real-Time & Historical: Make informed decisions with the latest data feeds, complemented by 60 days of historical data for trend analysis.

Granular Insights: Dive deep into B2B company profiles, NAICS codes, equipment utilized, industries served, certifications, SAM registration status, and precise geolocation for targeted outreach.

How is the Data Sourced?

We cultivate a multi-source approach, combining verified B2B information, industry directories, government databases, and supplier self-reported data. This comprehensive strategy guarantees the most accurate and current picture of the US government contracting landscape.

Primary Use Cases and Verticals:

Business Development: Identify and target qualified government contractors for potential partnerships and collaborations.

Government Contracting: Streamline your bidding process by pinpointing contractors with the specific capabilities and certifications required for government projects.

Cosmic Link Data as Part of Your Broader Strategy:

This data product seamlessly integrates with our broader US manufacturing data offerings. This allows you to gain a holistic view of the entire ecosystem, from raw materials and components to finished goods and distribution channels, with a specific focus on government contracting capabilities.

By leveraging Cosmic Link Data, you can:

Shorten sales cycles: Identify the right leads faster and increase your win rates on government contracts.

Optimize resource allocation: Focus your resources on the most promising opportunities.

Gain a competitive edge: Make data-driven decisions and confidently navigate the dynamic world of US government contracting.

Abstract

Syngenta is committed to increasing crop productivity and to using limited resources such as land, water and inputs more efficiently. Since 2014, Syngenta has been measuring trends in agricultural input efficiency on a global network of real farms. The Good Growth Plan dataset shows aggregated productivity and resource efficiency indicators by harvest year. The data has been collected from more than 4,000 farms and covers more than 20 different crops in 46 countries. The data (except USA data and for Barley in UK, Germany, Poland, Czech Republic, France and Spain) was collected, consolidated and reported by Kynetec (previously Market Probe), an independent market research agency. It can be used as benchmarks for crop yield and input efficiency.

Geographic coverage

National Coverage

Analysis unit

Agricultural holdings

Kind of data

Sample survey data [ssd]

Sampling procedure

A. Sample design Farms are grouped in clusters, which represent a crop grown in an area with homogenous agro- ecological conditions and include comparable types of farms. The sample includes reference and benchmark farms. The reference farms were selected by Syngenta and the benchmark farms were randomly selected by Kynetec within the same cluster.

B. Sample size Sample sizes for each cluster are determined with the aim to measure statistically significant increases in crop efficiency over time. This is done by Kynetec based on target productivity increases and assumptions regarding the variability of farm metrics in each cluster. The smaller the expected increase, the larger the sample size needed to measure significant differences over time. Variability within clusters is assumed based on public research and expert opinion. In addition, growers are also grouped in clusters as a means of keeping variances under control, as well as distinguishing between growers in terms of crop size, region and technological level. A minimum sample size of 20 interviews per cluster is needed. The minimum number of reference farms is 5 of 20. The optimal number of reference farms is 10 of 20 (balanced sample).

C. Selection procedure The respondents were picked randomly using a “quota based random sampling” procedure. Growers were first randomly selected and then checked if they complied with the quotas for crops, region, farm size etc. To avoid clustering high number of interviews at one sampling point, interviewers were instructed to do a maximum of 5 interviews in one village.

BF Screened from Indonesia were selected based on the following criterion:

(a) Corn growers in East Java - Location: East Java (Kediri and Probolinggo) and Aceh
- Innovative (early adopter); Progressive (keen to learn about agronomy and pests; willing to try new technology); Loyal (loyal to technology that can help them)
- making of technical drain (having irrigation system)
- marketing network for corn: post-harvest access to market (generally they sell 80% of their harvest)
- mid-tier (sub-optimal CP/SE use)
- influenced by fellow farmers and retailers
- may need longer credit

(b) Rice growers in West and East Java - Location: West Java (Tasikmalaya), East Java (Kediri), Central Java (Blora, Cilacap, Kebumen), South Lampung
- The growers are progressive (keen to learn about agronomy and pests; willing to try new technology)
- Accustomed in using farming equipment and pesticide. (keen to learn about agronomy and pests; willing to try new technology) - A long rice cultivating experience in his area (lots of experience in cultivating rice)
- willing to move forward in order to increase his productivity (same as progressive)
- have a soil that broad enough for the upcoming project
- have influence in his group (ability to influence others) - mid-tier (sub-optimal CP/SE use)
- may need longer credit

Mode of data collection

Face-to-face [f2f]

Research instrument

Data collection tool for 2019 covered the following information:

(A) PRE- HARVEST INFORMATION

PART I: Screening PART II: Contact Information PART III: Farm Characteristics a. Biodiversity conservation b. Soil conservation c. Soil erosion d. Description of growing area e. Training on crop cultivation and safety measures PART IV: Farming Practices - Before Harvest a. Planting and fruit development - Field crops b. Planting and fruit development - Tree crops c. Planting and fruit development - Sugarcane d. Planting and fruit development - Cauliflower e. Seed treatment

(B) HARVEST INFORMATION

PART V: Farming Practices - After Harvest a. Fertilizer usage b. Crop protection products c. Harvest timing & quality per crop - Field crops d. Harvest timing & quality per crop - Tree crops e. Harvest timing & quality per crop - Sugarcane f. Harvest timing & quality per crop - Banana g. After harvest PART VI - Other inputs - After Harvest a. Input costs b. Abiotic stress c. Irrigation

See all questionnaires in external materials tab

Cleaning operations

Data processing:

Kynetec uses SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) for data entry, cleaning, analysis, and reporting. After collection, the farm data is entered into a local database, reviewed, and quality-checked by the local Kynetec agency. In the case of missing values or inconsistencies, farmers are re-contacted. In some cases, grower data is verified with local experts (e.g. retailers) to ensure data accuracy and validity. After country-level cleaning, the farm-level data is submitted to the global Kynetec headquarters for processing. In the case of missing values or inconsistences, the local Kynetec office was re-contacted to clarify and solve issues.

B. Quality assurance Various consistency checks and internal controls are implemented throughout the entire data collection and reporting process in order to ensure unbiased, high quality data.

• Screening: Each grower is screened and selected by Kynetec based on cluster-specific criteria to ensure a comparable group of growers within each cluster. This helps keeping variability low.

• Evaluation of the questionnaire: The questionnaire aligns with the global objective of the project and is adapted to the local context (e.g. interviewers and growers should understand what is asked). Each year the questionnaire is evaluated based on several criteria, and updated where needed.

• Briefing of interviewers: Each year, local interviewers - familiar with the local context of farming -are thoroughly briefed to fully comprehend the questionnaire to obtain unbiased, accurate answers from respondents.

• Cross-validation of the answers:

o Kynetec captures all growers' responses through a digital data-entry tool. Various logical and consistency checks are automated in this tool (e.g. total crop size in hectares cannot be larger than farm size) 
o Kynetec cross validates the answers of the growers in three different ways: 
  1. Within the grower (check if growers respond consistently during the interview) 
  2. Across years (check if growers respond consistently throughout the years) 
  3. Within cluster (compare a grower's responses with those of others in the group) 

o All the above mentioned inconsistencies are followed up by contacting the growers and asking them to verify their answers. The data is updated after verification. All updates are tracked.

• Check and discuss evolutions and patterns: Global evolutions are calculated, discussed and reviewed on a monthly basis jointly by Kynetec and Syngenta.

• Sensitivity analysis: sensitivity analysis is conducted to evaluate the global results in terms of outliers, retention rates and overall statistical robustness. The results of the sensitivity analysis are discussed jointly by Kynetec and Syngenta.

• It is recommended that users interested in using the administrative level 1 variable in the location dataset use this variable with care and crosscheck it with the postal code variable.

Data appraisal

Due to the above mentioned checks, irregularities in fertilizer usage data were discovered which had to be corrected:

For data collection wave 2014, respondents were asked to give a total estimate of the fertilizer NPK-rates that were applied in the fields. From 2015 onwards, the questionnaire was redesigned to be more precise and obtain data by individual fertilizer products. The new method of measuring fertilizer inputs leads to more accurate results, but also makes a year-on-year comparison difficult. After evaluating several solutions to this problems, 2014 fertilizer usage (NPK input) was re-estimated by calculating a weighted average of fertilizer usage in the following years.

Snapshot img

Data Center Managed Services Market Size 2024-2028

The data center managed services market size is forecast to increase by USD 57.63 billion at a CAGR of 10.14% between 2023 and 2028.

The market is experiencing significant growth due to increasing demands for advanced computing capabilities and data storage solutions. With budgetary limits driving organizations to outsource IT infrastructure management, there is a rising need for managed services that can effectively manage computing machines, hardware equipment, IT systems, servers, data storage drives, and network equipment. The trend towards edge computing is also expanding the market, as businesses seek to process data closer to the source for faster response times. However, the integration of these services into existing data centers presents complex challenges, requiring expertise in both IT infrastructure and managed services. This market analysis report delves into these growth factors and the complexities of integrating data center-managed services, providing valuable insights for businesses looking to optimize their IT infrastructure.

What will the size of the market be during the forecast period?

Request Free Sample

The market represents a significant segment of the IT infrastructure landscape, providing businesses with essential solutions for maintaining and optimizing their IT infrastructure. This market encompasses a range of offerings, including hardware services, network services, backup maintenance, and fault tolerance solutions, among others. A reliable third-party managed service platform plays a crucial role in ensuring the upkeep and maintenance of an organization's IT infrastructure. By outsourcing these tasks, businesses can focus on their core competencies while ensuring their IT infrastructure remains reliable and efficient. Cloud infrastructure has become a norm in today's business environment, and data center managed services have evolved to meet the demands of this technology.



Furthermore, managed service providers offer expertise in managing complex IT networks, allowing businesses to leverage sophisticated technology without the need for extensive in-house IT resources. IT infrastructure is a foundational element of any growing business, and the need for reliable and efficient data center solutions is paramount. Managed services offer businesses the flexibility to scale their infrastructure as needed, without the logistical limits of managing hardware and software in-house. Network services are a critical component of data center managed services. External networks must be secure and reliable to ensure business continuity. Managed service providers offer solutions for upgrading and patching operating systems, disaster planning, and backup maintenance to mitigate potential risks and minimize downtime.

How is this market segmented and which is the largest segment?

The market research report provides comprehensive data (region-wise segment analysis), with forecasts and estimates in 'USD billion' for the period 2024-2028, as well as historical data from 2018-2022 for the following segments.

End-user

  Retail
  Energy
  BFSI
  Healthcare
  Others


Deployment

  Cloud
  On-premises


Geography

  North America

    US


  Europe

    Germany
    UK


  APAC

    China
    Japan


  South America



  Middle East and Africa

By End-user Insights

The retail segment is estimated to witness significant growth during the forecast period.

The market caters to the management of digital data and computing equipment for various businesses, including those that run web applications and internal applications. This market is witnessing significant growth due to the increasing demand for efficient and reliable IT infrastructure management services. Customers across multiple industries, such as human resources and accounting, are turning to managed services to streamline their operations and focus on their core competencies. Managed services providers offer a range of solutions, including monitoring, maintenance, and security, ensuring that businesses can effectively manage their IT infrastructure and mitigate potential risks.

The integration of advanced technologies, such as artificial intelligence and machine learning, further enhances the value proposition of these services. The market is expected to continue its expansion as more businesses recognize the benefits of outsourcing their IT management needs.

Get a glance at the market report of share of various segments Request Free Sample

The retail segment was valued at USD 15.59 billion in 2018 and showed a gradual increase during the forecast period.

Regional Analysis

North America is estimated to contribute 32% to the growth of the global market during the forecast period.

Technavio's analysts have elaborately explained the regional trends and drivers that

USA Corporate bond Reference data Reference data on more than 150K Corporate USA bonds. Historical data from 2000 onwards. Pay only for the parameters you need. Flexible in customizing our product to the customer's needs. Free test access as long as you need for integration. Reliable sources: issues' documents, disclosure website, global depositories data and other open sources. The cost depends on the amount of required parameters and re-distribution right.

Jurisdictional Unit, 2022-05-21. For use with WFDSS, IFTDSS, IRWIN, and InFORM.This is a feature service which provides Identify and Copy Feature capabilities. If fast-drawing at coarse zoom levels is a requirement, consider using the tile (map) service layer located at https://nifc.maps.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=3b2c5daad00742cd9f9b676c09d03d13.OverviewThe Jurisdictional Agencies dataset is developed as a national land management geospatial layer, focused on representing wildland fire jurisdictional responsibility, for interagency wildland fire applications, including WFDSS (Wildland Fire Decision Support System), IFTDSS (Interagency Fuels Treatment Decision Support System), IRWIN (Interagency Reporting of Wildland Fire Information), and InFORM (Interagency Fire Occurrence Reporting Modules). It is intended to provide federal wildland fire jurisdictional boundaries on a national scale. The agency and unit names are an indication of the primary manager name and unit name, respectively, recognizing that:There may be multiple owner names.Jurisdiction may be held jointly by agencies at different levels of government (ie State and Local), especially on private lands, Some owner names may be blocked for security reasons.Some jurisdictions may not allow the distribution of owner names. Private ownerships are shown in this layer with JurisdictionalUnitIdentifier=null,JurisdictionalUnitAgency=null, JurisdictionalUnitKind=null, and LandownerKind="Private", LandownerCategory="Private". All land inside the US country boundary is covered by a polygon.Jurisdiction for privately owned land varies widely depending on state, county, or local laws and ordinances, fire workload, and other factors, and is not available in a national dataset in most cases.For publicly held lands the agency name is the surface managing agency, such as Bureau of Land Management, United States Forest Service, etc. The unit name refers to the descriptive name of the polygon (i.e. Northern California District, Boise National Forest, etc.).These data are used to automatically populate fields on the WFDSS Incident Information page.This data layer implements the NWCG Jurisdictional Unit Polygon Geospatial Data Layer Standard.Relevant NWCG Definitions and StandardsUnit2. A generic term that represents an organizational entity that only has meaning when it is contextualized by a descriptor, e.g. jurisdictional.Definition Extension: When referring to an organizational entity, a unit refers to the smallest area or lowest level. Higher levels of an organization (region, agency, department, etc) can be derived from a unit based on organization hierarchy.Unit, JurisdictionalThe governmental entity having overall land and resource management responsibility for a specific geographical area as provided by law.Definition Extension: 1) Ultimately responsible for the fire report to account for statistical fire occurrence; 2) Responsible for setting fire management objectives; 3) Jurisdiction cannot be re-assigned by agreement; 4) The nature and extent of the incident determines jurisdiction (for example, Wildfire vs. All Hazard); 5) Responsible for signing a Delegation of Authority to the Incident Commander.See also: Unit, Protecting; LandownerUnit IdentifierThis data standard specifies the standard format and rules for Unit Identifier, a code used within the wildland fire community to uniquely identify a particular government organizational unit.Landowner Kind & CategoryThis data standard provides a two-tier classification (kind and category) of landownership. Attribute Fields JurisdictionalAgencyKind Describes the type of unit Jurisdiction using the NWCG Landowner Kind data standard. There are two valid values: Federal, and Other. A value may not be populated for all polygons.JurisdictionalAgencyCategoryDescribes the type of unit Jurisdiction using the NWCG Landowner Category data standard. Valid values include: ANCSA, BIA, BLM, BOR, DOD, DOE, NPS, USFS, USFWS, Foreign, Tribal, City, County, OtherLoc (other local, not in the standard), State. A value may not be populated for all polygons.JurisdictionalUnitNameThe name of the Jurisdictional Unit. Where an NWCG Unit ID exists for a polygon, this is the name used in the Name field from the NWCG Unit ID database. Where no NWCG Unit ID exists, this is the “Unit Name” or other specific, descriptive unit name field from the source dataset. A value is populated for all polygons.JurisdictionalUnitIDWhere it could be determined, this is the NWCG Standard Unit Identifier (Unit ID). Where it is unknown, the value is ‘Null’. Null Unit IDs can occur because a unit may not have a Unit ID, or because one could not be reliably determined from the source data. Not every land ownership has an NWCG Unit ID. Unit ID assignment rules are available from the Unit ID standard, linked above.LandownerKindThe landowner category value associated with the polygon. May be inferred from jurisdictional agency, or by lack of a jurisdictional agency. A value is populated for all polygons. There are three valid values: Federal, Private, or Other.LandownerCategoryThe landowner kind value associated with the polygon. May be inferred from jurisdictional agency, or by lack of a jurisdictional agency. A value is populated for all polygons. Valid values include: ANCSA, BIA, BLM, BOR, DOD, DOE, NPS, USFS, USFWS, Foreign, Tribal, City, County, OtherLoc (other local, not in the standard), State, Private.DataSourceThe database from which the polygon originated. Be as specific as possible, identify the geodatabase name and feature class in which the polygon originated.SecondaryDataSourceIf the Data Source is an aggregation from other sources, use this field to specify the source that supplied data to the aggregation. For example, if Data Source is "PAD-US 2.1", then for a USDA Forest Service polygon, the Secondary Data Source would be "USDA FS Automated Lands Program (ALP)". For a BLM polygon in the same dataset, Secondary Source would be "Surface Management Agency (SMA)."SourceUniqueIDIdentifier (GUID or ObjectID) in the data source. Used to trace the polygon back to its authoritative source.MapMethod:Controlled vocabulary to define how the geospatial feature was derived. Map method may help define data quality. MapMethod will be Mixed Method by default for this layer as the data are from mixed sources. Valid Values include: GPS-Driven; GPS-Flight; GPS-Walked; GPS-Walked/Driven; GPS-Unknown Travel Method; Hand Sketch; Digitized-Image; DigitizedTopo; Digitized-Other; Image Interpretation; Infrared Image; Modeled; Mixed Methods; Remote Sensing Derived; Survey/GCDB/Cadastral; Vector; Phone/Tablet; OtherDateCurrentThe last edit, update, of this GIS record. Date should follow the assigned NWCG Date Time data standard, using 24 hour clock, YYYY-MM-DDhh.mm.ssZ, ISO8601 Standard.CommentsAdditional information describing the feature. GeometryIDPrimary key for linking geospatial objects with other database systems. Required for every feature. This field may be renamed for each standard to fit the feature.JurisdictionalUnitID_sansUSNWCG Unit ID with the "US" characters removed from the beginning. Provided for backwards compatibility.JoinMethodAdditional information on how the polygon was matched information in the NWCG Unit ID database.LocalNameLocalName for the polygon provided from PADUS or other source.LegendJurisdictionalAgencyJurisdictional Agency but smaller landholding agencies, or agencies of indeterminate status are grouped for more intuitive use in a map legend or summary table.LegendLandownerAgencyLandowner Agency but smaller landholding agencies, or agencies of indeterminate status are grouped for more intuitive use in a map legend or summary table.DataSourceYearYear that the source data for the polygon were acquired.Data InputThis dataset is based on an aggregation of 4 spatial data sources: Protected Areas Database US (PAD-US 2.1), data from Bureau of Indian Affairs regional offices, the BLM Alaska Fire Service/State of Alaska, and Census Block-Group Geometry. NWCG Unit ID and Agency Kind/Category data are tabular and sourced from UnitIDActive.txt, in the WFMI Unit ID application (https://wfmi.nifc.gov/unit_id/Publish.html). Areas of with unknown Landowner Kind/Category and Jurisdictional Agency Kind/Category are assigned LandownerKind and LandownerCategory values of "Private" by use of the non-water polygons from the Census Block-Group geometry.PAD-US 2.1:This dataset is based in large part on the USGS Protected Areas Database of the United States - PAD-US 2.`. PAD-US is a compilation of authoritative protected areas data between agencies and organizations that ultimately results in a comprehensive and accurate inventory of protected areas for the United States to meet a variety of needs (e.g. conservation, recreation, public health, transportation, energy siting, ecological, or watershed assessments and planning). Extensive documentation on PAD-US processes and data sources is available.How these data were aggregated:Boundaries, and their descriptors, available in spatial databases (i.e. shapefiles or geodatabase feature classes) from land management agencies are the desired and primary data sources in PAD-US. If these authoritative sources are unavailable, or the agency recommends another source, data may be incorporated by other aggregators such as non-governmental organizations. Data sources are tracked for each record in the PAD-US geodatabase (see below).BIA and Tribal Data:BIA and Tribal land management data are not available in PAD-US. As such, data were aggregated from BIA regional offices. These data date from 2012 and were substantially updated in 2022. Indian Trust Land affiliated with Tribes, Reservations, or BIA Agencies: These data are not considered the system of record and are not intended to be used as such. The Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA), Branch of Wildland Fire Management (BWFM) is not the originator of these data. The

Priest Map Series {title at top of page}Data Developers: Burhans, Molly A., Cheney, David M., Emege, Thomas, Gerlt, R.. . “Priest Map Series {title at top of page}”. Scale not given. Version 1.0. MO and CT, USA: GoodLands Inc., Catholic Hierarchy, Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc., 2019.Web map developer: Molly Burhans, October 2019Web app developer: Molly Burhans, October 2019GoodLands’ polygon data layers, version 2.0 for global ecclesiastical boundaries of the Roman Catholic Church:Although care has been taken to ensure the accuracy, completeness and reliability of the information provided, due to this being the first developed dataset of global ecclesiastical boundaries curated from many sources it may have a higher margin of error than established geopolitical administrative boundary maps. Boundaries need to be verified with appropriate Ecclesiastical Leadership. The current information is subject to change without notice. No parties involved with the creation of this data are liable for indirect, special or incidental damage resulting from, arising out of or in connection with the use of the information. We referenced 1960 sources to build our global datasets of ecclesiastical jurisdictions. Often, they were isolated images of dioceses, historical documents and information about parishes that were cross checked. These sources can be viewed here:https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/11ANlH1S_aYJOyz4TtG0HHgz0OLxnOvXLHMt4FVOS85Q/edit#gid=0To learn more or contact us please visit: https://good-lands.org/The Catholic Leadership global maps information is derived from the Annuario Pontificio, which is curated and published by the Vatican Statistics Office annually, and digitized by David Cheney at Catholic-Hierarchy.org -- updated are supplemented with diocesan and news announcements. GoodLands maps this into global ecclesiastical boundaries. Admin 3 Ecclesiastical Territories:Burhans, Molly A., Cheney, David M., Gerlt, R.. . “Admin 3 Ecclesiastical Territories For Web”. Scale not given. Version 1.2. MO and CT, USA: GoodLands Inc., Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc., 2019.Derived from:Global Diocesan Boundaries:Burhans, M., Bell, J., Burhans, D., Carmichael, R., Cheney, D., Deaton, M., Emge, T. Gerlt, B., Grayson, J., Herries, J., Keegan, H., Skinner, A., Smith, M., Sousa, C., Trubetskoy, S. “Diocesean Boundaries of the Catholic Church” [Feature Layer]. Scale not given. Version 1.2. Redlands, CA, USA: GoodLands Inc., Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc., 2016.Using: ArcGIS. 10.4. Version 10.0. Redlands, CA: Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc., 2016.Boundary ProvenanceStatistics and Leadership DataCheney, D.M. “Catholic Hierarchy of the World” [Database]. Date Updated: August 2019. Catholic Hierarchy. Using: Paradox. Retrieved from Original Source.Catholic HierarchyAnnuario Pontificio per l’Anno .. Città del Vaticano :Tipografia Poliglotta Vaticana, Multiple Years.The data for these maps was extracted from the gold standard of Church data, the Annuario Pontificio, published yearly by the Vatican. The collection and data development of the Vatican Statistics Office are unknown. GoodLands is not responsible for errors within this data. We encourage people to document and report errant information to us at data@good-lands.org or directly to the Vatican.Additional information about regular changes in bishops and sees comes from a variety of public diocesan and news announcements.

United Healthcare Transparency in Coverage Dataset

Unlock the power of healthcare pricing transparency with our comprehensive United Healthcare Transparency in Coverage dataset. This invaluable resource provides unparalleled insights into healthcare costs, enabling data-driven decision-making for insurers, employers, researchers, and policymakers.

Key Features:

• Extensive Coverage: Access detailed pricing information for a wide range of medical procedures and services across the United States, covering approximately 76,000 employers.
• Granular Data: Analyze costs at the provider, plan, and employer levels, allowing for in-depth comparisons and trend analysis.
• Massive Scale: Over 400TB of data generated monthly, providing a wealth of information for comprehensive analysis.
• Historical Perspective: Track pricing changes over time to identify patterns and forecast future trends.
• Regular Updates: Stay current with the latest pricing information, ensuring your analyses are always based on the most recent data.

Detailed Data Points:

For each of the 76,000 employers, the dataset includes: 1. In-network negotiated rates for covered items and services 2. Historical out-of-network allowed amounts and billed charges 3. Cost-sharing information for specific items and services 4. Pricing data for medical procedures and services across providers, plans, and employers

Use Cases

For Insurers: - Benchmark your rates against competitors - Optimize network design and provider contracting - Develop more competitive and cost-effective insurance products

For Employers: - Make informed decisions about health plan offerings - Negotiate better rates with insurers and providers - Implement cost-saving strategies for employee healthcare

For Researchers: - Conduct in-depth studies on healthcare pricing variations - Analyze the impact of policy changes on healthcare costs - Investigate regional differences in healthcare pricing

For Policymakers: - Develop evidence-based healthcare policies - Monitor the effectiveness of price transparency initiatives - Identify areas for potential cost-saving interventions

Data Delivery

Our flexible data delivery options ensure you receive the information you need in the most convenient format:

• Custom Extracts: We can provide targeted datasets focusing on specific regions, procedures, or time periods.
• Regular Reports: Receive scheduled updates tailored to your specific requirements.

Why Choose Our Dataset?

1. Expertise: Our team has extensive experience in healthcare data retrieval and analysis, ensuring high-quality, reliable data.
2. Customization: We can tailor the dataset to meet your specific needs, whether you're interested in particular companies, regions, or procedures.
3. Scalability: Our infrastructure is designed to handle the massive scale of this dataset (400TB+ monthly), allowing us to provide comprehensive coverage without compromise.
4. Support: Our dedicated team is available to assist with data interpretation and technical support.

Harness the power of healthcare pricing transparency to drive your business forward. Contact us today to discuss how our United Healthcare Transparency in Coverage dataset can meet your specific needs and unlock valuable insights for your organization.

Altosight | AI Custom Web Scraping Data

✦ Altosight provides global web scraping data services with AI-powered technology that bypasses CAPTCHAs, blocking mechanisms, and handles dynamic content.

We extract data from marketplaces like Amazon, aggregators, e-commerce, and real estate websites, ensuring comprehensive and accurate results.

✦ Our solution offers free unlimited data points across any project, with no additional setup costs.

We deliver data through flexible methods such as API, CSV, JSON, and FTP, all at no extra charge.

― Key Use Cases ―

➤ Price Monitoring & Repricing Solutions

🔹 Automatic repricing, AI-driven repricing, and custom repricing rules 🔹 Receive price suggestions via API or CSV to stay competitive 🔹 Track competitors in real-time or at scheduled intervals

➤ E-commerce Optimization

🔹 Extract product prices, reviews, ratings, images, and trends 🔹 Identify trending products and enhance your e-commerce strategy 🔹 Build dropshipping tools or marketplace optimization platforms with our data

➤ Product Assortment Analysis

🔹 Extract the entire product catalog from competitor websites 🔹 Analyze product assortment to refine your own offerings and identify gaps 🔹 Understand competitor strategies and optimize your product lineup

➤ Marketplaces & Aggregators

🔹 Crawl entire product categories and track best-sellers 🔹 Monitor position changes across categories 🔹 Identify which eRetailers sell specific brands and which SKUs for better market analysis

➤ Business Website Data

🔹 Extract detailed company profiles, including financial statements, key personnel, industry reports, and market trends, enabling in-depth competitor and market analysis

🔹 Collect customer reviews and ratings from business websites to analyze brand sentiment and product performance, helping businesses refine their strategies

➤ Domain Name Data

🔹 Access comprehensive data, including domain registration details, ownership information, expiration dates, and contact information. Ideal for market research, brand monitoring, lead generation, and cybersecurity efforts

➤ Real Estate Data

🔹 Access property listings, prices, and availability 🔹 Analyze trends and opportunities for investment or sales strategies

― Data Collection & Quality ―

► Publicly Sourced Data: Altosight collects web scraping data from publicly available websites, online platforms, and industry-specific aggregators

► AI-Powered Scraping: Our technology handles dynamic content, JavaScript-heavy sites, and pagination, ensuring complete data extraction

► High Data Quality: We clean and structure unstructured data, ensuring it is reliable, accurate, and delivered in formats such as API, CSV, JSON, and more

► Industry Coverage: We serve industries including e-commerce, real estate, travel, finance, and more. Our solution supports use cases like market research, competitive analysis, and business intelligence

► Bulk Data Extraction: We support large-scale data extraction from multiple websites, allowing you to gather millions of data points across industries in a single project

► Scalable Infrastructure: Our platform is built to scale with your needs, allowing seamless extraction for projects of any size, from small pilot projects to ongoing, large-scale data extraction

― Why Choose Altosight? ―

✔ Unlimited Data Points: Altosight offers unlimited free attributes, meaning you can extract as many data points from a page as you need without extra charges

✔ Proprietary Anti-Blocking Technology: Altosight utilizes proprietary techniques to bypass blocking mechanisms, including CAPTCHAs, Cloudflare, and other obstacles. This ensures uninterrupted access to data, no matter how complex the target websites are

✔ Flexible Across Industries: Our crawlers easily adapt across industries, including e-commerce, real estate, finance, and more. We offer customized data solutions tailored to specific needs

✔ GDPR & CCPA Compliance: Your data is handled securely and ethically, ensuring compliance with GDPR, CCPA and other regulations

✔ No Setup or Infrastructure Costs: Start scraping without worrying about additional costs. We provide a hassle-free experience with fast project deployment

✔ Free Data Delivery Methods: Receive your data via API, CSV, JSON, or FTP at no extra charge. We ensure seamless integration with your systems

✔ Fast Support: Our team is always available via phone and email, resolving over 90% of support tickets within the same day

― Custom Projects & Real-Time Data ―

✦ Tailored Solutions: Every business has unique needs, which is why Altosight offers custom data projects. Contact us for a feasibility analysis, and we’ll design a solution that fits your goals

✦ Real-Time Data: Whether you need real-time data delivery or scheduled updates, we provide the flexibility to receive data when you need it. Track price changes, monitor product trends, or gather...

Welcome to the North America Data: Your Gateway to Strategic Connections Across the Americas

In today’s fast-evolving business landscape, having the right data at your fingertips is crucial for success. North America Data offers an unmatched resource designed to empower businesses by providing access to key decision-makers across the vast and diverse markets of North and South America. Our meticulously curated database serves as the cornerstone of your strategic outreach efforts, enabling you to connect with the right people in the right places at the right time.

What Makes Our Data Unique?

Depth and Precision
Our database is more than just a collection of names and contact details—it’s a gateway to deep, actionable insights about the people who shape industries. We go beyond basic data points to offer a nuanced understanding of top executives, owners, founders, and influencers. Whether you're looking to connect with a CEO of a Fortune 500 company or a founder of a dynamic startup, our data provides the precision you need to identify and engage the most relevant decision-makers.

Our Data Sourcing Excellence

Reliability and Integrity
Our data is sourced from a variety of authoritative channels, ensuring that every entry is both reliable and relevant. We draw from respected business directories, publicly available records, and proprietary research methodologies. Each piece of data undergoes a rigorous vetting process, meticulously checked for accuracy, to ensure that you can trust the integrity of the information you receive.

Primary Use-Cases and Industry Verticals

Versatility Across Sectors
The North America Data is a versatile tool designed to meet the needs of a wide range of industries. Whether you're in finance, manufacturing, technology, healthcare, retail, hospitality, energy, transportation, or any other sector, our database provides the critical insights necessary to drive your business forward. Use our data to:

• Expand Market Presence: Identify and connect with key players in new markets.
• Forge Strategic Partnerships: Reach out to potential collaborators and investors.

• Conduct Market Research: Gain a deeper understanding of industry trends and dynamics.

  Seamless Integration with Broader Data Solutions

Comprehensive Business Intelligence
Our North America Data is not an isolated resource; it’s a vital component of our comprehensive business intelligence suite. When combined with our global datasets, it provides a holistic view of the global business landscape. This integrated approach enables businesses to make well-informed decisions, tapping into insights that span across continents and sectors.

Geographical Coverage Across the Americas

Pan-American Reach
Our database covers the entirety of North and South America, offering a robust range of contacts across numerous countries, including but not limited to:

• United States
• Canada
• Mexico
• Brazil
• Argentina
• Colombia
• Chile
• Peru
• Venezuela

• And many more

  Extensive Industry Coverage

Tailored to Your Sector
We cater to a vast array of industries, ensuring that no matter your focus, our database has the coverage you need. Key industries include:

• Finance: Access to high-level contacts in banking, investment, and financial services.
• Manufacturing: Connect with decision-makers in production, logistics, and supply chain management.
• Technology: Engage with leaders in software, hardware, and IT services.
• Healthcare: Reach out to executives in hospitals, pharmaceuticals, and biotech.
• Retail: Identify key players in e-commerce, brick-and-mortar stores, and consumer goods.
• Hospitality: Connect with industry leaders in hotels, travel, and leisure.
• Energy: Tap into contacts within oil, gas, renewable energy, and utilities.

• Transportation: Engage with decision-makers in logistics, shipping, and infrastructure.

  Comprehensive Employee Size and Revenue Data

Insights Across Business Sizes
Our database doesn’t just provide contact information—it also includes detailed data on employee size and revenue. Whether you’re targeting small startups, mid-sized enterprises, or large multinational corporations, our database has the depth to accommodate your needs. We offer insights into:

• Employee Size: From small businesses with 1-10 employees to large enterprises with 10,000+ employees.

• Revenue Size: Covering companies ranging from early-stage startups to global giants in the Fortune 500.

  Empower Your Business with Unmatched Data Access

Unlock Opportunities Across the Americas
With the North America Data, you gain access to a powerful resource designed to unlock endless opportunities for growth and success. Whether you’re looking to break into new markets, establish strong business relationships, or enhance your market intelligence, our database equips you with the tools you need to excel.

Explore the North America Data tod...

We offer comprehensive data collection services that cater to a wide range of industries and applications. Whether you require image, audio, or text data, we have the expertise and resources to collect and deliver high-quality data that meets your specific requirements. Our data collection methods include manual collection, web scraping, and other automated techniques that ensure accuracy and completeness of data.

Our team of experienced data collectors and quality assurance professionals ensure that the data is collected and processed according to the highest standards of quality. We also take great care to ensure that the data we collect is relevant and applicable to your use case. This means that you can rely on us to provide you with clean and useful data that can be used to train machine learning models, improve business processes, or conduct research.

We are committed to delivering data in the format that you require. Whether you need raw data or a processed dataset, we can deliver the data in your preferred format, including CSV, JSON, or XML. We understand that every project is unique, and we work closely with our clients to ensure that we deliver the data that meets their specific needs. So if you need reliable data collection services for your next project, look no further than us.

Subscribers can find out export and import data of 23 countries by HS code or product’s name. This demo is helpful for market analysis.

Experience the transformative power of targeted connectivity with ListBuilders' meticulously curated US Library Contact Data. Our dedicated team has manually sourced data from across 46 states, creating an exceptional dataset that provides unrivaled depth and breadth in Library Staff Data within the US.

What sets our data apart is the painstakingly meticulous manual sourcing methods. This process guarantees the accuracy, timeliness, and reliability of every data point. We have compiled an impressive 16,000 records, each one featuring Validated Contact Details. This means that every entry is not only accurate but also actionable. This attention to detail and dedication to quality is what makes our data a valuable asset to businesses and researchers.

Our dataset offers data from a diverse range of library types, including Library Systems Data and Regional Library Systems Data. We have also distinguished between standalone libraries and branches, offering you more granular insights into the library sector landscape. This comprehensive coverage opens up a world of opportunities for creating precision-targeted strategies.

The primary use-cases for our dataset extend across multiple verticals, making it a versatile tool for a variety of industries. Marketing teams can leverage the Library Staff Data for precision-targeted campaigns. In the hands of HR professionals, the data becomes a resource for targeted recruitment drives. Market researchers will find our data invaluable for gaining in-depth understanding and conducting thorough analyses of the US library sector.

As a part of our broader data offering, this US Library Contact Data product exemplifies our commitment to quality and detail. We believe in the transformative power of reliable, accurate data in driving strategic decisions. Our dataset, enriched with Validated Contact Details and comprehensive coverage, provides the competitive edge your business needs, irrespective of your industry.

At ListBuilders, we don't just provide data; we provide reliable, actionable insights. Our commitment to quality is reflected in our validation process. All emails provided in our data have undergone a rigorous Email Verification process, ensuring they are valid, non-role-based, and not associated with free services such as Gmail. This process guarantees that your communications reach the right individuals, enhancing the effectiveness of your outreach efforts.

As we continue to evolve and expand our data offerings, our dedication to quality, accuracy, and actionable insights remains at the core of our mission. We understand that in the age of information, the right data can make all the difference. That's why we strive to provide the best Library Systems Data to meet all your business needs.

Experience the power of precision-targeted outreach with our US Library Contact Data. Uncover new opportunities, enhance your strategies, and achieve your business objectives with data you can trust. Discover the ListBuilders difference today and step into a world of data-driven possibilities.

On March 10, 2023, the Johns Hopkins Coronavirus Resource Center ceased collecting and reporting of global COVID-19 data. For updated cases, deaths, and vaccine data please visit the following sources:Global: World Health Organization (WHO)U.S.: U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)For more information, visit the Johns Hopkins Coronavirus Resource Center.This feature layer contains the most up-to-date COVID-19 cases for the US and Canada. Data sources: WHO, CDC, ECDC, NHC, DXY, 1point3acres, Worldometers.info, BNO, state and national government health departments, and local media reports. This layer is created and maintained by the Center for Systems Science and Engineering (CSSE) at the Johns Hopkins University. This feature layer is supported by the Esri Living Atlas team and JHU Data Services. This layer is opened to the public and free to share. Contact Johns Hopkins.IMPORTANT NOTICE: 1. Fields for Active Cases and Recovered Cases are set to 0 in all locations. John Hopkins has not found a reliable source for this information at the county level but will continue to look and carry the fields.2. Fields for Incident Rate and People Tested are placeholders for when this becomes available at the county level.3. In some instances, cases have not been assigned a location at the county scale. those are still assigned a state but are listed as unassigned and given a Lat Long of 0,0.Data Field Descriptions by Alias Name:Province/State: (Text) Country Province or State Name (Level 2 Key)Country/Region: (Text) Country or Region Name (Level 1 Key)Last Update: (Datetime) Last data update Date/Time in UTCLatitude: (Float) Geographic Latitude in Decimal Degrees (WGS1984)Longitude: (Float) Geographic Longitude in Decimal Degrees (WGS1984)Confirmed: (Long) Best collected count of Confirmed Cases reported by geographyRecovered: (Long) Not Currently in Use, JHU is looking for a sourceDeaths: (Long) Best collected count for Case Deaths reported by geographyActive: (Long) Confirmed - Recovered - Deaths (computed) Not Currently in Use due to lack of Recovered dataCounty: (Text) US County Name (Level 3 Key)FIPS: (Text) US State/County CodesCombined Key: (Text) Comma separated concatenation of Key Field values (L3, L2, L1)Incident Rate: (Long) People Tested: (Long) Not Currently in Use Placeholder for additional dataPeople Hospitalized: (Long) Not Currently in Use Placeholder for additional data

The size of the US Data Center Industry market was valued at USD XX Million in 2023 and is projected to reach USD XXX Million by 2032, with an expected CAGR of 6.00% during the forecast period.A data center is a facility that keeps computer systems and networking equipment housed, processing, and transmitting data. It represents the infrastructure on which organizations carry out their IT operations and host websites, email servers, and database servers. Data centers, therefore, are imperative to any size business: small start-ups or large enterprise since they enable digital transformation, thus making business applications available.The US data center industry is one of the largest and most developed in the world. The country boasts robust digital infrastructure, abundant energy resources, and a highly skilled workforce, making it an attractive destination for data center operators. Some of the drivers of the US data center market are the growing trend of cloud computing, internet of things (IoT), and high-performance computing requirements.Top-of-the-line technology companies along with cloud service providers set up major data center footprints in the US, mostly in key regions such as Silicon Valley and Northern Virginia, Dallas, for example. These data centers support applications such as e-commerce-a manner of accessing streaming services-whose development depends on its artificial intelligence financial service type. As demand increases concerning data center capacity, therefore, the US data centre industry will continue to prosper as the world's hub for reliable and scalable solutions. Recent developments include: February 2023: The expansion of Souther Telecom to its data center in Atlanta, Georgia, at 345 Courtland Street, was announced by H5 Data Centers, a colocation and wholesale data center operator. One of the top communication service providers in the southeast is Southern Telecom. Customers in Alabama, Georgia, Florida, and Mississippi will receive better service due to the expansion of this low-latency fiber optic network.December 2022: DigitalBridge Group, Inc. and IFM Investors announced completing their previously announced transaction in which funds affiliated with the investment management platform of DigitalBridge and an affiliate of IFM Investors acquired all outstanding common shares of Switch, Inc. for USD approximately USD 11 billion, including the repayment of outstanding debt.October 2022: Three additional data centers in Charlotte, Nashville, and Louisville have been made available to Flexential's cloud customers, according to the supplier of data center colocation, cloud computing, and connectivity. By the end of the year, clients will have access to more than 220MW of hybrid IT capacity spread across 40 data centers in 19 markets, which is well aligned with Flexential's 2022 ambition to add 33MW of new, sustainable data center development projects.. Key drivers for this market are: , High Mobile penetration, Low Tariff, and Mature Regulatory Authority; Successful Privatization and Liberalization Initiatives. Potential restraints include: , Difficulties in Customization According to Business Needs. Notable trends are: OTHER KEY INDUSTRY TRENDS COVERED IN THE REPORT.

USA Sovereign Bond Reference data Reference data on more than 2500 Sovereign USA bonds. Historical data from 2000 onwards. Pay only for the parameters you need. Flexible in customizing our product to the customer's needs. Free test access as long as you need for integration. Reliable sources: issues' documents, disclosure website, global depositories data and other open sources. The cost depends on the amount of required parameters and re-distribution right.

This study tests the efficacy of an intervention--Safe Public Spaces (SPS) -- focused on improving the safety of public spaces in schools, such as hallways, cafeterias, and stairwells. Twenty-four schools with middle grades in a large urban area were recruited for participation and were pair-matched and then assigned to either treatment or control. The study comprises four components: an implementation evaluation, a cost study, an impact study, and a community crime study. Community-crime-study: The community crime study used the arrest of juveniles from the NYPD (New York Police Department) data. The data can be found at (https://data.cityofnewyork.us/Public-Safety/NYPD-Arrests-Data-Historic-/8h9b-rp9u). Data include all arrest for the juvenile crime during the life of the intervention. The 12 matched schools were identified and geo-mapped using Quantum GIS (QGIS) 3.8 software. Block groups in the 2010 US Census in which the schools reside and neighboring block groups were mapped into micro-areas. This resulted in twelve experimental school blocks and 11 control blocks which the schools reside (two of the control schools existed in the same census block group). Additionally, neighboring blocks using were geo-mapped into 70 experimental and 77 control adjacent block groups (see map). Finally, juvenile arrests were mapped into experimental and control areas. Using the ARIMA time-series method in Stata 15 statistical software package, arrest data were analyzed to compare the change in juvenile arrests in the experimental and control sites. Cost-study: For the cost study, information from the implementing organization (Engaging Schools) was combined with data from phone conversations and follow-up communications with staff in school sites to populate a Resource Cost Model. The Resource Cost Model Excel file will be provided for archiving. This file contains details on the staff time and materials allocated to the intervention, as well as the NYC prices in 2018 US dollars associated with each element. Prices were gathered from multiple sources, including actual NYC DOE data on salaries for position types for which these data were available and district salary schedules for the other staff types. Census data were used to calculate benefits. Impact-evaluation: The impact evaluation was conducted using data from the Research Alliance for New York City Schools. Among the core functions of the Research Alliance is maintaining a unique archive of longitudinal data on NYC schools to support ongoing research. The Research Alliance builds and maintains an archive of longitudinal data about NYC schools. Their agreement with the New York City Department of Education (NYC DOE) outlines the data they receive, the process they use to obtain it, and the security measures to keep it safe. Implementation-study: The implementation study comprises the baseline survey and observation data. Interview transcripts are not archived.