This dataset contains information on the ratio of family income to the federal poverty level at the zip code tabulation area (ZCTA) level. Each column beginning with a "T_" lists the total number of families that fall into each income category. In addition, the dataset contains information on margins of error and the reliability of each estimate, to help guide decisionmakers in more effectively using the data contained in this file. There are approximately 1,000 records in this dataset. ZCTA boundaries are designed to approximate actual zip code boundaries, but are fixed to allow for consistent data analysis (whereas regular zip code boundaries change frequently). Field description metadata is available for download. For more information on poverty data from the Census Bureau, please visit American Factfinder (www.factfinder2.census.gov).

This annual study provides selected income and tax items classified by State, ZIP Code, and the size of adjusted gross income. These data include the number of returns, which approximates the number of households; the number of personal exemptions, which approximates the population; adjusted gross income; wages and salaries; dividends before exclusion; and interest received. Data are based who reported on U.S. Individual Income Tax Returns (Forms 1040) filed with the IRS. SOI collects these data as part of its Individual Income Tax Return (Form 1040) Statistics program, Data by Geographic Areas, ZIP Code Data.

These datasets contain measures of socioeconomic and demographic characteristics by U.S. census tract for the years 1990-2022 and ZIP code tabulation area (ZCTA) for the years 2008-2022. Example measures include population density; population distribution by race, ethnicity, age, and income; income inequality by race and ethnicity; and proportion of population living below the poverty level, receiving public assistance, and female-headed or single parent families with kids. The datasets also contain a set of theoretically derived measures capturing neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage and affluence, as well as a neighborhood index of Hispanic, foreign born, and limited English. The disadvantage variable was incorrectly calculated for the following datasets: DS7 Socioeconomic Status and Demographic Characteristics of Census Tracts (2020 Census), United States, 2018-2022 Data DS8 Socioeconomic Status and Demographic Characteristics of ZIP Code Tabulation Areas (2020 Census), United States, 2018-2022 Data Please refrain from downloading these datasets. The updated datasets are forthcoming and will be made available soon. Users needing these datasets can reach out to nanda-admin@umich.edu.

US Census American Community Survey (ACS) 2020, 5-year estimates of the key economic characteristics of ZIP Code Tabulation Areas geographic level in Orange County, California. The data contains 397 fields for the variable groups E01: Employment status (universe: population 16 years and over, table X23, 7 fields); E02: Work status by age of worker (universe: population 16 years and over, table X23, 36 fields); E03: Commuting to work (universe: workers 16 years and over, table X8, 8 fields); E04: Travel time to work (universe: workers 16 years and over who did not work at home, table X8, 14 fields); E05: Number of vehicles available for workers (universe: workers 16 years and over in households, table X8, 8 fields); E06: Median age by means of transportation to work (universe: median age, workers 16 years and over, table X8, 7 fields); E07: Means of transportation to work by race (universe: workers 16 years and over, table X8, 64 fields); E08: Occupation (universe: civilian employed population 16 years and over, table X24, 53 fields); E09: Industry (universe: civilian employed population 16 years and over, table X24, 43 fields); E10: Class of worker (universe: civilian employed population 16 years and over, table X24, 19 fields); E11: Household income and earnings in the past 12 months (universe: total households, table X19, 37 fields); E12: Income and earnings in dollars (universe: inflation-adjusted dollars, tables X19-X20, 31 fields); E13: Family income in dollars (universe: total families, table X19, 17 fields); E14: Health insurance coverage (universe: total families, table X19, 17 fields); E15: Ratio of income to Poverty level (universe: total population for whom Poverty level is determined, table X17, 8 fields); E16: Poverty in population in the past 12 months (universe: total population for whom Poverty level is determined, table X17, 7 fields); E17: Poverty in households in the past 12 months (universe: total households, table X17, 9 fields); E18: Percentage of families and people whose income in the past 12 months is below the poverty level (universe: families, population, table X17, 8 fields), and; X19: Poverty and income deficit (dollars) in the past 12 months for families (universe: families with income below Poverty level in the past 12 months, table X17, 4 fields). The US Census geodemographic data are based on the 2020 TigerLines across multiple geographies. The spatial geographies were merged with ACS data tables. See full documentation at the OCACS project GitHub page (https://github.com/ktalexan/OCACS-Geodemographics).

This American Community Survey (ACS) dataset identifies poverty status by zip code tabulation areas within the United States, from 2012 through 2016. The poverty characteristics include race, sex, age, educational attainment, employment status, work experience, and poverty level.

A dataset listing the richest zip codes in West Virginia per the most current US Census data, including information on rank and average income.

This dataset identifies selected economic characteristics by zip code tabulation areas within the United States. This dataset resulted from the American Community Survey (ACS) conducted from 2010 through 2014. The economic characteristics include employment status, commuting to work, occupation, class of worker, income and benefits, health insurance coverage, and percentage of families and people whose income in the past 12 months is below the poverty level.

This is a re-symbolization of the data found here: https://dallasgis.maps.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=6fc65a96d79944e093a04cd507a25a34 It allows for a quick look at the poverty rates in and around zipcodes in the Dallas Metro area.The census tract data was obtained for the state of Texas from the Census Bureau's TIGER/Line files and clipped to City of Dallas boundaries. Table S1701 (Poverty Status in the Past 12 Months)ZipCodes: https://dallasgis.maps.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=aca3ce05245c460f88fd7d77be09749e The Postal Service does not publish ZIP codes as you would think of them in a polygonal format. They are merely a collection of carrier routes. Zipcode Mapping is at best an approximation of the carrier routes, and subject to change without notice.National ZipCodes: https://dallasgis.maps.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=0a2fde8aa7404187917488bafcbc77e6

A dataset listing the richest zip codes in New Jersey per the most current US Census data, including information on rank and average income.

A dataset listing the richest zip codes in North Carolina per the most current US Census data, including information on rank and average income.

TIGER, TIGER/Line, and Census TIGER are registered trademarks of the Bureau of the Census. The Redistricting Census 2000 TIGER/Line files are an extract of selected geographic and cartographic information from the Census TIGER data base. The geographic coverage for a single TIGER/Line file is a county or statistical equivalent entity, with the coverage area based on January 1, 2000 legal boundaries. A complete set of Redistricting Census 2000 TIGER/Line files includes all counties and statistically equivalent entities in the United States and Puerto Rico. The Redistricting Census 2000 TIGER/Line files will not include files for the Island Areas. The Census TIGER data base represents a seamless national file with no overlaps or gaps between parts. However, each county-based TIGER/Line file is designed to stand alone as an independent data set or the files can be combined to cover the whole Nation. The Redistricting Census 2000 TIGER/Line files consist of line segments representing physical features and governmental and statistical boundaries. The Redistricting Census 2000 TIGER/Line files do NOT contain the ZIP Code Tabulation Areas (ZCTAs) and the address ranges are of approximately the same vintage as those appearing in the 1999 TIGER/Line files. That is, the Census Bureau is producing the Redistricting Census 2000 TIGER/Line files in advance of the computer processing that will ensure that the address ranges in the TIGER/Line files agree with the final Master Address File (MAF) used for tabulating Census 2000. The files contain information distributed over a series of record types for the spatial objects of a county. There are 17 record types, including the basic data record, the shape coordinate points, and geographic codes that can be used with appropriate software to prepare maps. Other geographic information contained in the files includes attributes such as feature identifiers/census feature class codes (CFCC) used to differentiate feature types, address ranges and ZIP Codes, codes for legal and statistical entities, latitude/longitude coordinates of linear and point features, landmark point features, area landmarks, key geographic features, and area boundaries. The Redistricting Census 2000 TIGER/Line data dictionary contains a complete list of all the fields in the 17 record types.

This study contains measures of neighborhood-school gap for 2009-2010 and 2015-2016. Neighborhood-school gap (NS gap) refers to the discrepancy between the demographics of a public school and its surrounding community. For example, if 60 percent of a school's student body is Black, but 30 percent of the neighborhood population is Black, the school has a positive Black neighborhood-school gap. These datasets measure gaps in race and poverty between elementary school student populations and the census tracts and ZIP code tabulation areas (ZCTAs) that those elementary schools serve. Data is at the census tract and ZCTA level. Supplemental data containing component variables used to calculate NS gap at the school and block group level is also available.

This dataset identifies the poverty status of families by zip code tabulation areas within the United States. This dataset resulted from the American Community Survey (ACS) conducted from 2010 through 2014. The family characteristics include race, age, householder work status, supplemental income, educational attainment, number of related children, number of people, and number of workers in the household.

A dataset listing the richest zip codes in Puerto Rico per the most current US Census data, including information on rank and average income.

US Census American Community Survey (ACS) 2015, 5-year estimates of the key economic characteristics of ZIP Code Tabulation Areas geographic level in Orange County, California. The data contains 397 fields for the variable groups E01: Employment status (universe: population 16 years and over, table X23, 7 fields); E02: Work status by age of worker (universe: population 16 years and over, table X23, 36 fields); E03: Commuting to work (universe: workers 16 years and over, table X8, 8 fields); E04: Travel time to work (universe: workers 16 years and over who did not work at home, table X8, 14 fields); E05: Number of vehicles available for workers (universe: workers 16 years and over in households, table X8, 8 fields); E06: Median age by means of transportation to work (universe: median age, workers 16 years and over, table X8, 7 fields); E07: Means of transportation to work by race (universe: workers 16 years and over, table X8, 64 fields); E08: Occupation (universe: civilian employed population 16 years and over, table X24, 53 fields); E09: Industry (universe: civilian employed population 16 years and over, table X24, 43 fields); E10: Class of worker (universe: civilian employed population 16 years and over, table X24, 19 fields); E11: Household income and earnings in the past 12 months (universe: total households, table X19, 37 fields); E12: Income and earnings in dollars (universe: inflation-adjusted dollars, tables X19-X20, 31 fields); E13: Family income in dollars (universe: total families, table X19, 17 fields); E14: Health insurance coverage (universe: total families, table X19, 17 fields); E15: Ratio of income to Poverty level (universe: total population for whom Poverty level is determined, table X17, 8 fields); E16: Poverty in population in the past 12 months (universe: total population for whom Poverty level is determined, table X17, 7 fields); E17: Poverty in households in the past 12 months (universe: total households, table X17, 9 fields); E18: Percentage of families and people whose income in the past 12 months is below the poverty level (universe: families, population, table X17, 8 fields), and; X19: Poverty and income deficit (dollars) in the past 12 months for families (universe: families with income below Poverty level in the past 12 months, table X17, 4 fields). The US Census geodemographic data are based on the 2015 TigerLines across multiple geographies. The spatial geographies were merged with ACS data tables. See full documentation at the OCACS project github page (https://github.com/ktalexan/OCACS-Geodemographics).

US Census American Community Survey (ACS) 2017, 5-year estimates of the key economic characteristics of ZIP Code Tabulation Areas geographic level in Orange County, California. The data contains 397 fields for the variable groups E01: Employment status (universe: population 16 years and over, table X23, 7 fields); E02: Work status by age of worker (universe: population 16 years and over, table X23, 36 fields); E03: Commuting to work (universe: workers 16 years and over, table X8, 8 fields); E04: Travel time to work (universe: workers 16 years and over who did not work at home, table X8, 14 fields); E05: Number of vehicles available for workers (universe: workers 16 years and over in households, table X8, 8 fields); E06: Median age by means of transportation to work (universe: median age, workers 16 years and over, table X8, 7 fields); E07: Means of transportation to work by race (universe: workers 16 years and over, table X8, 64 fields); E08: Occupation (universe: civilian employed population 16 years and over, table X24, 53 fields); E09: Industry (universe: civilian employed population 16 years and over, table X24, 43 fields); E10: Class of worker (universe: civilian employed population 16 years and over, table X24, 19 fields); E11: Household income and earnings in the past 12 months (universe: total households, table X19, 37 fields); E12: Income and earnings in dollars (universe: inflation-adjusted dollars, tables X19-X20, 31 fields); E13: Family income in dollars (universe: total families, table X19, 17 fields); E14: Health insurance coverage (universe: total families, table X19, 17 fields); E15: Ratio of income to Poverty level (universe: total population for whom Poverty level is determined, table X17, 8 fields); E16: Poverty in population in the past 12 months (universe: total population for whom Poverty level is determined, table X17, 7 fields); E17: Poverty in households in the past 12 months (universe: total households, table X17, 9 fields); E18: Percentage of families and people whose income in the past 12 months is below the poverty level (universe: families, population, table X17, 8 fields), and; X19: Poverty and income deficit (dollars) in the past 12 months for families (universe: families with income below Poverty level in the past 12 months, table X17, 4 fields). The US Census geodemographic data are based on the 2017 TigerLines across multiple geographies. The spatial geographies were merged with ACS data tables. See full documentation at the OCACS project github page (https://github.com/ktalexan/OCACS-Geodemographics).

This data set contains zip code tabulation areas for 5-digit zip codes in New Mexico. It was obtained from the U.S. Census Bureau web page http://www.census.gov/geo/www/cob/zt.html. The metadata at this site is so poor that this metadata record has been created. Technical details are available from the technical documentation at http://www.census.gov/geo/ZCTA/zctatddr.pdf. A ZIP Code tabulation area (ZCTA ) is a statistical geographic entity that approximates the delivery area for a U.S. Postal Service five-digit or three-digit ZIP Code. ZCTAs are aggregations of census blocks that have the same predominant ZIP Code associated with the addresses in the U.S. Census Bureau's Master Address File. Three -digit ZCTA codes are applied to large contiguous areas for which the U.S. Census Bureau does not have five-digit ZIP Code information in its Master Address File. ZCTAs do not precisely depict ZIP Code delivery areas, and do not include all ZIP Codes used for mail delivery. The U.S. Census Bureau has established ZCTAs as a new geographic entity similar to, but replacing, data tabulations for ZIP Codes undertaken in conjunction with the 1990 and earlier censuses.

This dataset was developed by the Research & Analytics Group at the Atlanta Regional Commission using data from the U.S. Census Bureau.For a deep dive into the data model including every specific metric, see the Infrastructure Manifest. The manifest details ARC-defined naming conventions, field names/descriptions and topics, summary levels; source tables; notes and so forth for all metrics.Naming conventions:Prefixes: None Countp Percentr Ratem Mediana Mean (average)t Aggregate (total)ch Change in absolute terms (value in t2 - value in t1)pch Percent change ((value in t2 - value in t1) / value in t1)chp Change in percent (percent in t2 - percent in t1)s Significance flag for change: 1 = statistically significant with a 90% CI, 0 = not statistically significant, blank = cannot be computed Suffixes: _e19 Estimate from 2014-19 ACS_m19 Margin of Error from 2014-19 ACS_00_v19 Decennial 2000, re-estimated to 2019 geography_00_19 Change, 2000-19_e10_v19 2006-10 ACS, re-estimated to 2019 geography_m10_v19 Margin of Error from 2006-10 ACS, re-estimated to 2019 geography_e10_19 Change, 2010-19The user should note that American Community Survey data represent estimates derived from a surveyed sample of the population, which creates some level of uncertainty, as opposed to an exact measure of the entire population (the full census count is only conducted once every 10 years and does not cover as many detailed characteristics of the population). Therefore, any measure reported by ACS should not be taken as an exact number – this is why a corresponding margin of error (MOE) is also given for ACS measures. The size of the MOE relative to its corresponding estimate value provides an indication of confidence in the accuracy of each estimate. Each MOE is expressed in the same units as its corresponding measure; for example, if the estimate value is expressed as a number, then its MOE will also be a number; if the estimate value is expressed as a percent, then its MOE will also be a percent. The user should also note that for relatively small geographic areas, such as census tracts shown here, ACS only releases combined 5-year estimates, meaning these estimates represent rolling averages of survey results that were collected over a 5-year span (in this case 2015-2019). Therefore, these data do not represent any one specific point in time or even one specific year. For geographic areas with larger populations, 3-year and 1-year estimates are also available. For further explanation of ACS estimates and margin of error, visit Census ACS website.Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Atlanta Regional CommissionDate: 2015-2019Data License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC by 4.0)Link to the manifest: https://www.arcgis.com/sharing/rest/content/items/3d489c725bb24f52a987b302147c46ee/data

This layer was developed by the Research & Analytics Group of the Atlanta Regional Commission, using data from American Community Survey 5-year estimates for 2011-2015 to show poverty status and rates, by age category, by zip code in the Atlanta region.

The user should note that American Community Survey data represent estimates derived from a surveyed sample of the population, which creates some level of uncertainty, as opposed to an exact measure of the entire population (the full census count is only conducted once every 10 years and does not cover as many detailed characteristics of the population). Therefore, any measure reported by ACS should not be taken as an exact number. ACS data presented here represent combined 5-year estimates, meaning these estimates represent rolling averages of survey results that were collected over a 5-year span (in this case 2011-2015). Therefore, these data do not represent any one specific point in time or even one specific year. For further explanation of ACS estimates and methodology, click here.

Attributes:

ZIP = Zip code (text)

ZIP_dbl = Zip code (numeric)

Total_Population_2010 = Total Population, 2010 Census

Total_Population_2011_2015_ACS = Total Population, 2011-2015 American Community Survey (ACS)

Pop_PovertyStatus_Determined = #, Population for whom poverty status is determined

Population_in_poverty = #, Population in poverty

Percent_Population_in_poverty = %, Population in poverty

Pop_under18_PovStatusDetermined = #, Population under 18 years for whom poverty status is determined

Pop_under18_in_Poverty = #, Population under 18 years in poverty

Pct_Pop_under18_in_Poverty = %, Population under 18 years in poverty

Pop_18_64_PovStatus_Determined = #, Population 18 to 64 years for whom poverty status is determined

Pop_18_64_Years_in_Poverty = #, Population 18 to 64 years in poverty

Pct_Pop_18_64_Years_in_Poverty = %, Population 18 to 64 years in poverty

Pop_65older_PovStatusDetermined = #, Population 65 years and over for whom poverty status is determined

Pop_65older_in_Poverty = #, Population 65 years and over in poverty

Pct_Pop_65older_in_Poverty = %, Population 65 years and over in poverty

last_edited_date = Last date the feature was edited by ARC

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Atlanta Regional Commission

Date: 2011-2015