Note: This LCMS CONUS Cause of Change image service has been deprecated. It has been replaced by the LCMS CONUS Annual Change image service, which provides updated and consolidated change data.Please refer to the new service here: https://usfs.maps.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=085626ec50324e5e9ad6323c050ac84dThis product is part of the Landscape Change Monitoring System (LCMS) data suite. It shows LCMS change attribution classes for each year. See additional information about change in the Entity_and_Attribute_Information or Fields section below.LCMS is a remote sensing-based system for mapping and monitoring landscape change across the United States. Its objective is to develop a consistent approach using the latest technology and advancements in change detection to produce a "best available" map of landscape change. Because no algorithm performs best in all situations, LCMS uses an ensemble of models as predictors, which improves map accuracy across a range of ecosystems and change processes (Healey et al., 2018). The resulting suite of LCMS change, land cover, and land use maps offer a holistic depiction of landscape change across the United States over the past four decades.Predictor layers for the LCMS model include outputs from the LandTrendr and CCDC change detection algorithms and terrain information. These components are all accessed and processed using Google Earth Engine (Gorelick et al., 2017). To produce annual composites, the cFmask (Zhu and Woodcock, 2012), cloudScore, and TDOM (Chastain et al., 2019) cloud and cloud shadow masking methods are applied to Landsat Tier 1 and Sentinel 2a and 2b Level-1C top of atmosphere reflectance data. The annual medoid is then computed to summarize each year into a single composite. The composite time series is temporally segmented using LandTrendr (Kennedy et al., 2010; Kennedy et al., 2018; Cohen et al., 2018). All cloud and cloud shadow free values are also temporally segmented using the CCDC algorithm (Zhu and Woodcock, 2014). LandTrendr, CCDC and terrain predictors can be used as independent predictor variables in a Random Forest (Breiman, 2001) model. LandTrendr predictor variables include fitted values, pair-wise differences, segment duration, change magnitude, and slope. CCDC predictor variables include CCDC sine and cosine coefficients (first 3 harmonics), fitted values, and pairwise differences from the Julian Day of each pixel used in the annual composites and LandTrendr. Terrain predictor variables include elevation, slope, sine of aspect, cosine of aspect, and topographic position indices (Weiss, 2001) from the USGS 3D Elevation Program (3DEP) (U.S. Geological Survey, 2019). Reference data are collected using TimeSync, a web-based tool that helps analysts visualize and interpret the Landsat data record from 1984-present (Cohen et al., 2010).Outputs fall into three categories: change, land cover, and land use. Change relates specifically to vegetation cover and includes slow loss (not included for PRUSVI), fast loss (which also includes hydrologic changes such as inundation or desiccation), and gain. These values are predicted for each year of the time series and serve as the foundational products for LCMS. References: Breiman, L. (2001). Random Forests. In Machine Learning (Vol. 45, pp. 5-32). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324Chastain, R., Housman, I., Goldstein, J., Finco, M., and Tenneson, K. (2019). Empirical cross sensor comparison of Sentinel-2A and 2B MSI, Landsat-8 OLI, and Landsat-7 ETM top of atmosphere spectral characteristics over the conterminous United States. In Remote Sensing of Environment (Vol. 221, pp. 274-285). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2018.11.012Cohen, W. B., Yang, Z., and Kennedy, R. (2010). Detecting trends in forest disturbance and recovery using yearly Landsat time series: 2. TimeSync - Tools for calibration and validation. In Remote Sensing of Environment (Vol. 114, Issue 12, pp. 2911-2924). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2010.07.010Cohen, W. B., Yang, Z., Healey, S. P., Kennedy, R. E., and Gorelick, N. (2018). A LandTrendr multispectral ensemble for forest disturbance detection. In Remote Sensing of Environment (Vol. 205, pp. 131-140). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.11.015Foga, S., Scaramuzza, P.L., Guo, S., Zhu, Z., Dilley, R.D., Beckmann, T., Schmidt, G.L., Dwyer, J.L., Hughes, M.J., Laue, B. (2017). Cloud detection algorithm comparison and validation for operational Landsat data products. Remote Sensing of Environment, 194, 379-390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.03.026Gorelick, N., Hancher, M., Dixon, M., Ilyushchenko, S., Thau, D., and Moore, R. (2017). Google Earth Engine: Planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone. In Remote Sensing of Environment (Vol. 202, pp. 18-27). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.06.031Healey, S. P., Cohen, W. B., Yang, Z., Kenneth Brewer, C., Brooks, E. B., Gorelick, N., Hernandez, A. J., Huang, C., Joseph Hughes, M., Kennedy, R. E., Loveland, T. R., Moisen, G. G., Schroeder, T. A., Stehman, S. V., Vogelmann, J. E., Woodcock, C. E., Yang, L., and Zhu, Z. (2018). Mapping forest change using stacked generalization: An ensemble approach. In Remote Sensing of Environment (Vol. 204, pp. 717-728). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.09.029Kennedy, R. E., Yang, Z., and Cohen, W. B. (2010). Detecting trends in forest disturbance and recovery using yearly Landsat time series: 1. LandTrendr - Temporal segmentation algorithms. In Remote Sensing of Environment (Vol. 114, Issue 12, pp. 2897-2910). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2010.07.008Kennedy, R., Yang, Z., Gorelick, N., Braaten, J., Cavalcante, L., Cohen, W., and Healey, S. (2018). Implementation of the LandTrendr Algorithm on Google Earth Engine. In Remote Sensing (Vol. 10, Issue 5, p. 691). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10050691Olofsson, P., Foody, G. M., Herold, M., Stehman, S. V., Woodcock, C. E., and Wulder, M. A. (2014). Good practices for estimating area and assessing accuracy of land change. In Remote Sensing of Environment (Vol. 148, pp. 42-57). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2014.02.015Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., Michel, V., Thirion, B., Grisel, O., Blondel, M., Prettenhofer, P., Weiss, R., Dubourg, V., Vanderplas, J., Passos, A., Cournapeau, D., Brucher, M., Perrot, M. and Duchesnay, E. (2011). Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python. In Journal of Machine Learning Research (Vol. 12, pp. 2825-2830).Pengra, B. W., Stehman, S. V., Horton, J. A., Dockter, D. J., Schroeder, T. A., Yang, Z., Cohen, W. B., Healey, S. P., and Loveland, T. R. (2020). Quality control and assessment of interpreter consistency of annual land cover reference data in an operational national monitoring program. In Remote Sensing of Environment (Vol. 238, p. 111261). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2019.111261U.S. Geological Survey. (2019). USGS 3D Elevation Program Digital Elevation Model, accessed August 2022 at https://developers.google.com/earth-engine/datasets/catalog/USGS_3DEP_10mWeiss, A.D. (2001). Topographic position and landforms analysis Poster Presentation, ESRI Users Conference, San Diego, CAZhu, Z., and Woodcock, C. E. (2012). Object-based cloud and cloud shadow detection in Landsat imagery. In Remote Sensing of Environment (Vol. 118, pp. 83-94). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2011.10.028Zhu, Z., and Woodcock, C. E. (2014). Continuous change detection and classification of land cover using all available Landsat data. In Remote Sensing of Environment (Vol. 144, pp. 152-171). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2014.01.011This record was taken from the USDA Enterprise Data Inventory that feeds into the https://data.gov catalog. Data for this record includes the following resources: ISO-19139 metadata ArcGIS Hub Dataset ArcGIS GeoService For complete information, please visit https://data.gov.

The global Geographic Information System (GIS) market is booming, projected to reach $17.5 billion by 2033 with a 5.8% CAGR. Discover key trends, drivers, and regional insights in this comprehensive market analysis, covering major players and applications.

This project serves as a focal point of capability and expertise for integrating remote sensing, satellite telemetry and GIS. Working collaboratively with other principal investigators, this project applies satellite and software technologies to study spatial and temporal interactions between wildlife populations and their environment. There are three primary objectives: 1) develop optimal structures for wildlife distribution databases with emphasis on satellite tracking data; 2) develop environmental thematic databases with emphasis on Arctic regions; and 3) develop GIS algorithms for integrated data analyses. Commensurate with accelerating advances in remote sensing, satellite telemetry, and geographic information system (GIS) technology, the primary objective of this task is to evaluate and apply these state-of-the-art tools for developing or improving the methodologies used in wildlife and ecosystem research. The need for cost-effective techniques to systematically acquire environmental data for remote or inaccessible areas, and locational data for highly mobile or migratory species, crosses bureau, program and issue boundaries. This is especially true in arctic regions, where numerous fish and wildlife populations often range internationally, across extensive landscapes of tundra, boreal forest, polar sea-ice, and aquatic ecosystems. Remote sensing technologies provide alternatives to traditional sampling methods, which are typically too expensive to implement across large spatial scales or severely compromised by hazardous weather conditions and extended winter darkness. Publications: Douglas, D.C., 2010, Arctic sea ice decline: Projected changes in timing and extent of sea ice in the Bering and Chukchi Seas: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2010-1176, 32 p. Belchansky, G. I., D. C. Douglas, and N. G. Platonov (2005), Spatial and temporal variations in the age structure of Arctic sea ice, Geophys. Res. Lett.,32, L18504, doi:10.1029/2005GL023976 Belchanksy, G. I., D. C. Douglas, I. N. Mordvintsev, and N. G. Platonov (2004), Estimating the time of melt onset and freeze onset over Arctic sea-ice area using active and passive microwave data. Remote Sens. Environ., 92 , 21-39. Belchansky, G. I., D. C. Douglas, and N. G. Platonov (2004), Duration of the Arctic sea ice melt season: Regional and interannual variability, 1979-2001, J. Climate, 17 , 67-80. Belchansky, G. I., D. C. Douglas, I. V. Alpatsky, and N. G. Platonov (2004) , Spatial and temporal multiyear sea ice distributions in the Arctic : A neural network analysis of SSM/I data, 1988-2001, J. Geophys. Res. , 109 (C12), doi:10.1029/2004JC002388. Stone, R. S., D. C. Douglas, G. I. Belchansky, S. D. Drobot, and J. Harris (2005), Cause and effect of variations in western Arctic snow and sea ice cover. 8.3, Proc. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 8 th Conf. on Polar Oceanogr. and Meteorol. , San Diego , CA , 9-13 January. Belchansky, G. I., D. C. Douglas, V. A. Eremeev, and N. G. Platonov (2005), Variations in the Arctic's multiyear sea ice cover: A neural network analysis of SMMR-SSM/I data, 1979-2004. Geophys. Res. Lett. Vol. 32, No. 9, L09605, doi:10.1029/2005GL022395. Stone, R. S., D. C. Douglas, G. I. Belchansky, and S. D. Drobot (2005), Polar climate: Arctic sea ice, Pages 39-41 in D. H. Levinson (ed.), State of the Climate in 2004, Bull. Amer. Meterol. Soc., Vol. 86, No. 6, 86 pp. Stone, R. S., D. C. Douglas, G. I. Belchansky, and S. D. Drobot (2005), Correlated declines in western Arctic snow and sea ice cover. Arctic Res. United States, 19:18-25.

Discover the booming Satellite Remote Sensing Software market! Explore key trends, growth drivers, and regional market shares in our comprehensive analysis. Learn about leading companies and the future of this technology in agriculture, forestry, and beyond. Get the insights you need to make informed decisions.

The booming remote sensing software market is projected to reach $5 billion by 2025, growing at a CAGR of 8% until 2033. Driven by advancements in sensor technology and cloud computing, this market caters to various sectors, including environmental monitoring, urban planning, and defense. Learn about key market trends and leading players.

The Computer Vision in Geospatial Imagery market is experiencing robust growth, driven by increasing demand for accurate and efficient geospatial data analysis across various sectors. Advancements in artificial intelligence (AI), deep learning, and high-resolution imaging technologies are fueling this expansion. The market's ability to extract valuable insights from aerial and satellite imagery is transforming industries such as agriculture, urban planning, environmental monitoring, and defense. Applications range from precision agriculture using drone imagery for crop health monitoring to autonomous vehicle navigation and infrastructure inspection using high-resolution satellite data. The integration of computer vision with cloud computing platforms facilitates large-scale data processing and analysis, further accelerating market growth. We estimate the 2025 market size to be approximately $2.5 billion, exhibiting a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 15% from 2025 to 2033. This growth is expected to continue, driven by increasing adoption of advanced analytics and the need for real-time geospatial intelligence. Several factors contribute to this positive outlook. The decreasing cost of high-resolution sensors and cloud computing resources is making computer vision solutions more accessible. Furthermore, the growing availability of large datasets for training sophisticated AI models is enhancing the accuracy and performance of computer vision algorithms in analyzing geospatial data. However, challenges remain, including data privacy concerns, the need for robust data security measures, and the complexity of integrating diverse data sources. Nevertheless, the overall market trend remains strongly upward, with significant opportunities for technology providers and users alike. The key players listed—Alteryx, Google, Keyence, and others—are actively shaping this landscape through innovative product development and strategic partnerships.

Land cover maps are a critical component to make informed policy, development, planning, and resource management decisions. However, technical, capacity, and institutional challenges inhibit the creation of consistent and relevant land cover maps for use in developing regions. Many developing regions lack coordinated capacity, infrastructure, and technologies to produce a robust land cover monitoring system that meets land management needs. Local capacity may be replaced by external consultants or methods which lack long-term sustainability. In this study, we characterize and respond to the key land cover mapping gaps and challenges encountered in the Lower Mekong (LMR) and Hindu Kush-Himalaya (HKH) region through a needs assessment exercise and a collaborative system design. Needs were assessed using multiple approaches, including focus groups, user engagement workshops, and online surveys. Efforts to understand existing limitations and stakeholder needs resulted in a co-developed and modular land cover monitoring system which utilizes state-of-the-art cloud computing and machine learning which leverages freely available Earth observations. This approach meets the needs of diverse actors and is a model for transnational cooperation.

Snow, glaciers and permafrost in cold mountain areas such as the Swiss Alps are especially sensitive to changes in environmental conditions due to their proximity to melting conditions. In addition, mass wasting is most intensive in those mountain areas with high relief energy. Environmental changes in high mountain regions substantially influence the potential for glacial and periglacial hazards. Ice- and moraine-dammed lakes represent a widespread hazard potential closely related to glacier fluctuations. Magnitude and frequency of ice avalanches from steep glaciers - in principle a normal expression of mass exchange under such topographic conditions - are coupled with stability conditions affected by glacier advance/retreat and, hence, with long-term atmospheric impacts. Steep and unstable reservoirs of loose debris, a potential source of debris flows, are often the result of glacier shrinkage. In a similar way, changes in the stress regime due to vanishing glaciers lead to potential destabilization of adjacent valley flanks.

 Since the Alps are among the most densely populated high mountain areas in the
 world, Switzerland is particularly impacted by glacial and periglacial hazards
 but, on the other hand, also has an extensive and well-recognized tradition in
 investigating such processes. A number of specific monitoring and modeling
 studies related to single hazardous situations have been performed, mainly
 based on recent catastrophes or imminent hazard situations. An urgent need
 exists for area-wide modeling of glacier hazard potentials with a view to
 establishing an integrated and adequate information base for planning and
 detailed monitoring, but a corresponding systematic approach is, for the
 present, still lacking.

 The proposed project aims at closing this gap in several ways: Work Package
 (WP) (1): By developing techniques for detection of glacier hazard potentials
 based on optical spaceborne remote sensing data which rarely has been used to
 date in Swiss glacier monitoring; multispectral analyses and multitemporal and
 multiscale fusion will play a major role in this, with a special focus on
 recent or upcoming high resolution sensors. WP (2): By integrating empirical
 models for glacier hazard assessment into geographical information systems
 (GIS) which have proven to be successful for hazard simulation but have not
 been used yet for determining glacier hazard potentials; GIS modeling
 especially allows for the fusion of remote sensing and elevation data for
 spatial (3D) analyses. To ensure high synergy, WPs (1) and (2) will be closely
 related to the ongoing SNF project "The Swiss Glacier Inventory 2000" (SWI
 2000) (no. 21-54073.98) and the international project "Global Land Ice
 Monitoring from Space" (GLIMS). WP (3): By applying the methods from WPs (1)
 and (2), an initial attempt will be undertaken to implement an area-wide model
 for integrating glacier hazard potentials of extensive regions in the Swiss
 Alps following a downscaling strategy with varying resolution and accuracy
 levels, both with respect to data and to models. As hazard management in
 Switzerland is the domain of local and regional authorities, the proposed
 project does not aim at preparing detailed local hazard maps (Gefahrenkarten),
 but rather will provide new remote sensing and modeling techniques for
 decision support. It should demonstrate the usefulness of these techniques for
 overview mapping (Gefahrenhinweiskarten) as a basis for decision-making and for
 scenario simulations in connection with climate change effects. The efforts
 made in this project will contribute to handle economically complex
 mathematical and physical models and represent a decision basis for the
 specific need of further detailed case studies. A further outcome will be a
 documentation of historical glacier catastrophes in the Swiss Alps, which will
 - among others - be used for model calibration and verification.

 [Summary provided by Christian Huggel, University of Zurich.]

The Geographic Information System (GIS) market is experiencing robust growth, projected to reach $2979.7 million in 2025 and maintain a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 5.5% from 2025 to 2033. This expansion is driven by several key factors. Increasing urbanization and infrastructure development necessitate sophisticated spatial data management and analysis, fueling demand for GIS solutions across various sectors. The construction industry, for instance, leverages GIS for project planning, site surveying, and resource management, while utilities companies use it for network optimization and asset management. Furthermore, the growing adoption of cloud-based GIS platforms enhances accessibility, scalability, and cost-effectiveness, attracting a wider user base. Precision agriculture, another significant driver, utilizes GIS for efficient land management, crop monitoring, and yield optimization. Technological advancements, particularly in areas like sensor technology (imaging sensors, LIDAR), GNSS/GPS, and improved data analytics capabilities, continuously enhance GIS functionalities and expand its applications. Competitive landscape includes major players like Esri, Hexagon, and Autodesk, driving innovation and fostering market competitiveness. However, the market faces some challenges. The high initial investment required for implementing GIS solutions, along with the need for specialized technical expertise, can be barriers to entry, particularly for smaller businesses. Data security and privacy concerns also remain a significant factor influencing market growth. Despite these restraints, the long-term outlook for the GIS market remains positive, driven by continued technological progress, increasing data availability, and growing awareness of the benefits of spatial data analysis across diverse industries. The market is expected to witness substantial growth in regions like Asia Pacific and North America owing to high adoption rates and increasing investment in infrastructure projects. The consistent improvements in accuracy and cost-effectiveness of GIS technology will continue to open up new application areas, further fueling market expansion throughout the forecast period.

This data was collected from Scopus database. Data is the part of a research article 'A bibliographic trend investigation of GIS research: the global landscape'. The data is useful for GIS and remote sensing domain researchers and practitioners.

The satellite remote sensing market is booming, projected to reach $4911.2 million by 2025, with a 17.9% CAGR. Discover key drivers, trends, and leading companies shaping this dynamic sector, including Airbus, Boeing, and Planet Labs. Explore market size projections and regional breakdowns for informed strategic planning.

Multi-temporal landslide inventories are important information for the understanding of landslide dynamics and related predisposing and triggering factors, and thus a crucial prerequisite for probabilistic hazard and risk assessment. Despite the great importance of these inventories, they do not exist for many landslide prone regions in the world. In this context, the recently evolving global-scale availability of high temporal and spatial resolution optical satellite imagery (RapidEye, Sentinel-2A/B, planet) has opened up new opportunities for the creation of these multi-temporal inventories. To derive such multi-temporal landslide inventories, a semi-automated spatiotemporal landslide mapper was developed at the Remote Sensing Section of the GFZ Potsdam being capable of deriving post-failure landslide objects (polygons) from multi-sensor optical satellite time series data (Behling et al., 2016). The developed approach represents an extension of the original methodology (Behling et al., 2014, Behling and Roessner, 2020) and facilitates the integration of optical time series data acquired by different satellite systems. The goal of combining satellite data originating from variable sensor systems has been the establishment of longest possible time series for retrospective systematic assessment of multi-temporal landslide activity at highest possible temporal and spatial resolution. We applied the developed approach to a 2500 km² study area in Southern Kyrgyzstan using an optical satellite database acquired by the Landsat TM/ETM+, SPOT 1/5, IRS1-C LISSIII, ASTER, and RapidEye sensor systems covering a time period between 1986 and 2013. A multi-temporal landslide inventory from 2009-2013 derived from RapidEye satellite time series data is available as separate publications (Behling et al., 2014; Behling and Roessner, 2020). The resulting systematic multi-temporal landslide inventory being subject of this data publication is supplementary to the article of Behling et al. (2016), which describes the extended spatiotemporal landslide mapper in detail. This multi-sensor approach prioritizes most suitable images within the available multi-sensor satellite time series using parameters, such as spatial resolution, cloud coverage, similarity of sensor characteristics and seasonality related to vegetation characteristics with the goal of establishing a robust back-bone time series for initial detection of possible landslide objects. In a second step, this initial analysis gets more refined in order to achieve the best possible approximation of the date of landslide occurrence. For a more detailed description of the methodology of the extended spatiotemporal landslide mapper, please see Behling et al. (2016). In general, this landslide mapper detects landslide objects by analyzing temporal NDVI-based vegetation cover changes and relief-oriented parameters in a rule-based approach combining pixel- and object-based analysis. Typical landslide-related vegetation changes comprise abrupt disturbances of vegetation cover in the result of the actual failure as well as post-failure revegetation which usually happens at a slower pace compared to vegetation growth in the surrounding undisturbed areas, since the displaced landslide masses are susceptible to subsequent erosion and reactivation processes. The resulting landslide-specific temporal surface cover dynamics in form of temporal trajectories is used as input information to identify freshly occurred landslides and to separate them from other temporal variations in the surrounding vegetation cover (e.g., seasonal vegetation changes or changes due to agricultural activities) and from permanently non-vegetated areas (e.g., urban non-vegetated areas, water bodies, rock outcrops). The data are provided in vector format (polygons) in form of a standard shapefile contained in the zip-file 2020-002_Behling_et-al_2016_landslide_inventory_SouthernKyrgyzstan_1986_2013.zip and are described in more detail in the associated data description.

This data set contains high-resolution QuickBird imagery and geospatial data for the entire Barrow QuickBird image area (156.15° W - 157.07° W, 71.15° N - 71.41° N) and Barrow B4 Quadrangle (156.29° W - 156.89° W, 71.25° N - 71.40° N), for use in Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and remote sensing software. The original QuickBird data sets were acquired by DigitalGlobe from 1 to 2 August 2002, and consist of orthorectified satellite imagery. Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC)-compliant metadata for all value-added data sets are provided in text, HTML, and XML formats. Accessory layers include: 1:250,000- and 1:63,360-scale USGS Digital Raster Graphic (DRG) mosaic images (GeoTIFF format); 1:250,000- and 1:63,360-scale USGS quadrangle index maps (ESRI Shapefile format); an index map for the 62 QuickBird tiles (ESRI Shapefile format); and a simple polygon layer of the extent of the Barrow QuickBird image area and the Barrow B4 quadrangle area (ESRI Shapefile format). Unmodified QuickBird data comprise 62 data tiles in Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) Zone 4 in GeoTIFF format. Standard release files describing the QuickBird data are included, along with the DigitalGlobe license agreement and product handbooks. The baseline geospatial data support education, outreach, and multi-disciplinary research of environmental change in Barrow, which is an area of focused scientific interest. Data are provided on four DVDs. This product is available only to investigators funded specifically from the National Science Foundation (NSF), Office of Polar Programs (OPP), Arctic Sciences Section. An NSF OPP award number must be provided when ordering this data.

Artificial lighting is strongly associated with urbanisation and is increasing in its extent, brightness and spectral range. Changes in urban lighting have both positive and negative effects on city performance, yet little is known about how its character and magnitude vary across the urban landscape. A major barrier to related research, planning and governance has been the lack of lighting data at the city extent, particularly at a fine spatial resolution. Our aims were therefore to capture such data using aerial night photography and to undertake a case study of urban lighting. We present the finest scale multi-spectral lighting dataset available for an entire city and explore how lighting metrics vary with built density and land-use. We found positive relationships between artificial lighting indicators and built density at coarse spatial scales, whilst at a local level lighting varied with land-use. Manufacturing and housing are the primary land-use zones responsible for the city’s brightly lit areas, yet manufacturing sites are relatively rare within the city. Our data suggests that efforts to address light pollution should broaden their focus from residential street lighting to include security lighting within manufacturing areas.

The booming Geospatial Solutions market is projected to reach $375.8 Billion by 2033, growing at a CAGR of 7.2%. This comprehensive analysis explores market drivers, trends, restraints, and key players across North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific. Discover insights into hardware, software, service segments and applications like utility, transportation, and defense.

The Remote Sensing Image Processing Platform market is booming, projected to reach $2542 million by 2025, driven by AI, cloud computing, and high-resolution imagery. Explore market trends, key players (ESRI, Hexagon, etc.), and future growth projections in this comprehensive analysis.

The remote sensing interpretation software market is experiencing robust growth, driven by increasing demand for precise geospatial data across diverse sectors. The market's expansion is fueled by technological advancements in satellite imagery, drone technology, and artificial intelligence (AI), enabling more efficient and accurate data analysis. Applications span agriculture (precision farming), urban planning (infrastructure development and monitoring), environmental monitoring (deforestation tracking, pollution detection), defense & security (surveillance and intelligence), and natural resource management. The rising adoption of cloud-based solutions and the growing need for real-time data processing further contribute to market expansion. We estimate the market size in 2025 to be approximately $5 billion, considering the significant investments in R&D and the expanding applications across various sectors. A compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 12% is projected from 2025 to 2033, indicating substantial future growth potential. However, the market also faces challenges. High initial investment costs for software and hardware, the need for specialized expertise in data interpretation, and data security and privacy concerns act as restraints on market growth. Furthermore, the market is characterized by intense competition among established players like Hexagon, Microsoft, and IBM, and emerging technology providers. The market is segmented by software type (cloud-based, on-premise), application (agriculture, urban planning, environmental monitoring), and region. North America and Europe currently hold significant market share, driven by early adoption and established infrastructure. However, the Asia-Pacific region is witnessing rapid growth due to increasing government initiatives and rising investments in infrastructure development. The competitive landscape is dynamic, with mergers and acquisitions, strategic partnerships, and technological innovations shaping the market’s future. The market's trajectory suggests a promising future, but continued innovation and addressal of challenges will be crucial to sustain this growth.

Question Paper Solutions of chapter Database and Coordinate System of GIS & Remote Sensing, 8th Semester , Civil Engineering

The global satellite remote sensing image market is booming, projected to reach $1740 million in 2025 and grow at a 13.9% CAGR through 2033. Discover key trends, drivers, and regional breakdowns in this comprehensive market analysis, including insights into high-resolution imagery, key players, and future growth potential.

This is a landing page. To access the datasets, expand the RELATED DATASETS section below, and follow the link to the dataset you require. \r \r --------------------------------------\r \r The Remote Sensing Organisational Unit as part of the Water Group, within the NSW Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water (NSW DCCEEW) is dedicated to harnessing the power of satellite earth observations, aerial imagery, in-situ data, and advanced modelling techniques to produce cutting-edge remote sensing information products. Our team employs a multi-faceted approach, integrating remote sensing data captured by satellites operating at various temporal and spatial scales with on-the-ground observations and key spatial datasets, including land-use mapping, weather data, and ancillary verification datasets. This synthesis of diverse information sources enables us to derive critical insights that significantly contribute to water resource planning, policy formulation, and advancements in scientific research.\r \r Drawing upon satellite imagery from reputable sources such as NASA, the European Space Agency, and commercial providers like Planet and SPOT, our team places a special emphasis on leveraging Landsat and Sentinel satellite imagery. Renowned for their archived, calibrated, and consistent datasets, these sources provide a significant advantage in our pursuit of delivering accurate and reliable information. To ensure the robustness of our information products, we implement thorough validation processes, incorporating semi-automation techniques that facilitate rapid turnaround times.\r \r Our operational efficiency is further enhanced through strategic interventions in our workflows, including the automation of processes through efficient computing scripts and the utilization of Google Earth Engine for cloud computing. This integrated approach allows us to maintain high standards of data quality while meeting the increasing demand for timely and accurate information.\r \r Our commitment to providing high-quality, professional, and technically accurate Remote Sensing - Geographic Information System (RS-GIS) data packages, maps, and information is underscored by our recognition of the growing role of technology in information transfer and the promotion of information sharing. Moreover, our dedication to ensuring the currency of RS-GIS methods, interpretation techniques, and 3D modelling enables us to continually deliver innovative products that align with evolving client expectations. Through these efforts, our team strives to contribute meaningfully to the advancement of remote sensing applications for improved environmental understanding and informed decision-making.\r \r -----------------------------------\r \r Note: If you would like to ask a question, make any suggestions, or tell us how you are using this dataset, please visit the NSW Water Hub which has an online forum you can join.\r \r \r \r \r