The database includes information on Russian journals published by Federal universities, National Research universities and Basic universities and covers such aspects as indexing information in different bibliographic databases, volumes of indexed papers in 2018-2022, rankings in different databases, subject categories, geographical locations, numbers of issues per year, list of founders, journals sites, etc. (in total 59 variables).

Here are the data for papers [1,2]. The 1st excel sheet ("theory") has data for Figures 1, 2 of [1]. The 2nd sheet ("JCR data") has data for Figures 3, 4, 5, 6 of [1], and Figure 1 of [2].A. Data in the "theory" sheet:2nd row: Citation count, c, of a single paper published by a journal of Impact Factor f1=10 and biennial size N1. We have chosen c to range from 0 to 1000 in our data. 2nd column: biennial size N1 of journal. We have chosen N1 to range from 10 to 2500 in our data. The data in the cells from C3 to EC283 in the sheet are calculations of the volatility, Δf(c), as defined in Eq. (4) of [1].B. Data in the "JCR data" sheet:The publication and citation data below are from each journal's individual Journal Citation Report for 2017. Impact Factor. These are data from the 2017 Journal Citation Reports (JCR).Journal biennial size, N2Y. This is the number of articles & reviews published in 2015-2016 by each journal.Citation average, f. This is the average number of citations received in 2017 by the articles & reviews published in 2015-2016.Volatility, Δf(c*): This is defined as f - f* (see below for f*)Relative volatility, Δfr(c*): This is defined as (f - f*)/f* (see below for f*)Top-cited paper, c*: This is the citation count of the top-cited paper in each journal, in the year 2017. Citation average excluding top-cited paper, f*: This is the average number of citations received in 2017 by the articles & reviews published in 2015-2016, once we exclude the top-cited paper (article or review). AcknowledgmentThis work uses data, accessed through Columbia University, from the Web of Science and Journal Citation Reports (2017) with explicit consent from Clarivate Analytics.References [1] M. Antonoyiannakis, Impact Factor volatility to a single paper: A comprehensive analysis, Quantitative Science Studies (2020, accepted), https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.02533[2] M. Antonoyiannakis, How a single paper affects the Impact Factor: Implications for Scholarly Publishing, Proceedings of the 17th Conference of the International Society on Scientometrics & Informetrics, vol. II, 2306-2313 (2019), https://arxiv.org/abs/1906.02660

The classification in reproducible and not reproducible models was made by Tiwari et al.

Citations were looked up in Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar.

The following journals had to be excluded, as Journal Impact Factors (JIF) were missing or papers were discontinued: * Experientia was closed 1996 and continued as Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences 1997 * The American journal of physiology – split into fields 1977, further splits in 1980 and 1989 * IFAC Proceedings Volumes – last issue 2014, continued as IFAC-PapersOnLine * Mathematical and Computer Modelling – discontinued as of 2014 * IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering – not a journal but conference proceedings – no impact factor listed * Infectious Disease Modelling – no impact factor found * Jurnal Teknologi – no impact factor found * JCO clinical cancer informatics – no impact factor found * Quantitative biology (Beijing, China) – no impact factor found * Letters in Biomathematics – no impact factor found * Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference – no impact factor found * Haemostasis – discontinued; no impact factor found

It was tried to include as many papers as possible.

As the JIF is calculated every year, an average JIF of the Journal Citation Reports from 2014 to 2021 was calculated and used for the analysis. The results do not differ qualitatively if only the JIF of 2021 was used. As the Journal Impact Factor reports belong to Clarivate the JCR data was not uploaded to the repository.

Version: 6

Date of data collection: May 2025

General description: Publication of datasets according to the FAIR principles could be reached publishing a data paper (and/or a software paper) in data journals as well as in academic standard journals. The excel and CSV file contains a list of academic journals that publish data papers and software papers.

File list:

- data_articles_journal_list_v6.xlsx: full list of 177 academic journals in which data papers or/and software papers could be published
- data_articles_journal_list_v6.csv: full list of 177 academic journals in which data papers or/and software papers could be published
- readme_v6.txt, with a detailed descritption of the dataset and its variables.

Relationship between files: both files have the same information. Two different formats are offered to improve reuse

Type of version of the dataset: final processed version

Versions of the files: 6th version
- Information updated: number of journals (17 were added and 4 were deleted), URL, document types associated to a specific journal.
- Information added: diamond journals were identified.

Version: 5

Authors: Carlota Balsa-Sánchez, Vanesa Loureiro

Date of data collection: 2023/09/05

General description: The publication of datasets according to the FAIR principles, could be reached publishing a data paper (or software paper) in data journals or in academic standard journals. The excel and CSV file contains a list of academic journals that publish data papers and software papers.
File list:

- data_articles_journal_list_v5.xlsx: full list of 162 academic journals in which data papers or/and software papers could be published
- data_articles_journal_list_v5.csv: full list of 162 academic journals in which data papers or/and software papers could be published

Relationship between files: both files have the same information. Two different formats are offered to improve reuse

Type of version of the dataset: final processed version

Versions of the files: 5th version
- Information updated: number of journals, URL, document types associated to a specific journal.
163 journals (excel y csv)

Version: 4

Authors: Carlota Balsa-Sánchez, Vanesa Loureiro

Date of data collection: 2022/12/15

General description: The publication of datasets according to the FAIR principles, could be reached publishing a data paper (or software paper) in data journals or in academic standard journals. The excel and CSV file contains a list of academic journals that publish data papers and software papers.
File list:

- data_articles_journal_list_v4.xlsx: full list of 140 academic journals in which data papers or/and software papers could be published
- data_articles_journal_list_v4.csv: full list of 140 academic journals in which data papers or/and software papers could be published

Relationship between files: both files have the same information. Two different formats are offered to improve reuse

Type of version of the dataset: final processed version

Versions of the files: 4th version
- Information updated: number of journals, URL, document types associated to a specific journal, publishers normalization and simplification of document types
- Information added : listed in the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), indexed in Web of Science (WOS) and quartile in Journal Citation Reports (JCR) and/or Scimago Journal and Country Rank (SJR), Scopus and Web of Science (WOS), Journal Master List.

Version: 3

Authors: Carlota Balsa-Sánchez, Vanesa Loureiro

Date of data collection: 2022/10/28

General description: The publication of datasets according to the FAIR principles, could be reached publishing a data paper (or software paper) in data journals or in academic standard journals. The excel and CSV file contains a list of academic journals that publish data papers and software papers.
File list:

- data_articles_journal_list_v3.xlsx: full list of 124 academic journals in which data papers or/and software papers could be published
- data_articles_journal_list_3.csv: full list of 124 academic journals in which data papers or/and software papers could be published

Relationship between files: both files have the same information. Two different formats are offered to improve reuse

Type of version of the dataset: final processed version

Versions of the files: 3rd version
- Information updated: number of journals, URL, document types associated to a specific journal, publishers normalization and simplification of document types
- Information added : listed in the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), indexed in Web of Science (WOS) and quartile in Journal Citation Reports (JCR) and/or Scimago Journal and Country Rank (SJR).

Erratum - Data articles in journals Version 3:

Botanical Studies -- ISSN 1999-3110 -- JCR (JIF) Q2
Data -- ISSN 2306-5729 -- JCR (JIF) n/a
Data in Brief -- ISSN 2352-3409 -- JCR (JIF) n/a

Version: 2

Author: Francisco Rubio, Universitat Politècnia de València.

Date of data collection: 2020/06/23

General description: The publication of datasets according to the FAIR principles, could be reached publishing a data paper (or software paper) in data journals or in academic standard journals. The excel and CSV file contains a list of academic journals that publish data papers and software papers.
File list:

- data_articles_journal_list_v2.xlsx: full list of 56 academic journals in which data papers or/and software papers could be published
- data_articles_journal_list_v2.csv: full list of 56 academic journals in which data papers or/and software papers could be published

Relationship between files: both files have the same information. Two different formats are offered to improve reuse

Type of version of the dataset: final processed version

Versions of the files: 2nd version
- Information updated: number of journals, URL, document types associated to a specific journal, publishers normalization and simplification of document types
- Information added : listed in the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), indexed in Web of Science (WOS) and quartile in Scimago Journal and Country Rank (SJR)

Total size: 32 KB

Version 1: Description

This dataset contains a list of journals that publish data articles, code, software articles and database articles.

The search strategy in DOAJ and Ulrichsweb was the search for the word data in the title of the journals.
Acknowledgements:
Xaquín Lores Torres for his invaluable help in preparing this dataset.

Polymer engineering and science Impact Factor 2024-2025 - ResearchHelpDesk - Polymer engineering and science - Every day, the Society of Plastics Engineers (SPE) takes action to help companies in the plastics industry succeed. How? By spreading knowledge, strengthening skills and promoting plastics. Employing these vital strategies, Polymer engineering and science - SPE has helped the plastics industry thrive for over 60 years. In the process, we've developed a 25,000-member network of leading engineers and other plastics professionals, including technicians, salespeople, marketers, retailers, and representatives from tertiary industries. For more than 30 years, Polymer Engineering & Science has been one of the most highly regarded journals in the field, serving as a forum for authors of treatises on the cutting edge of polymer science and technology. The importance of PE&S is underscored by the frequent rate at which its articles are cited, especially by other publications - literally thousands of times a year. Engineers, researchers, technicians, and academicians worldwide are looking to PE&S for the valuable information they need. There are special issues compiled by distinguished guest editors. These contain proceedings of symposia on such diverse topics as polyblends, mechanics of plastics and polymer welding. Abstracting and Indexing Information Academic ASAP (GALE Cengage) Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database (ProQuest) Applied Science & Technology Index/Abstracts (EBSCO Publishing) CAS: Chemical Abstracts Service (ACS) CCR Database (Clarivate Analytics) Chemical Abstracts Service/SciFinder (ACS) Chemistry Server Reaction Center (Clarivate Analytics) ChemWeb (ChemIndustry.com) Chimica Database (Elsevier) COMPENDEX (Elsevier) Current Contents: Engineering, Computing & Technology (Clarivate Analytics) Current Contents: Physical, Chemical & Earth Sciences (Clarivate Analytics) Expanded Academic ASAP (GALE Cengage) InfoTrac (GALE Cengage) Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics) Materials Science & Engineering Database (ProQuest) PASCAL Database (INIST/CNRS) Polymer Library (iSmithers RAPRA) ProQuest Central (ProQuest) ProQuest Central K-462 Reaction Citation Index (Clarivate Analytics) Research Library (ProQuest) Research Library Prep (ProQuest) Science Citation Index (Clarivate Analytics) Science Citation Index Expanded (Clarivate Analytics) SciTech Premium Collection (ProQuest) SCOPUS (Elsevier) STEM Database (ProQuest) Technology Collection (ProQuest) Web of Science (Clarivate Analytics)

The Expanded Journal List (EJL) contains over 39,000 sources in a list that combines the sources from Journal Citation Report (Web of Science) SCImago Journal Rank (Scopus) and CWTS CORE (OpenAlex).

Research data to accommodate the article "Overlay journals: a study of the current landscape" (https://doi.org/10.1177/09610006221125208)

Identifying the sample of overlay journals was an explorative process (occurring during April 2021 to February 2022). The sample of investigated overlay journals were identified by using the websites of Episciences.org (2021), Scholastica (2021), Free Journal Network (2021), Open Journals (2021), PubPub (2022), and Wikipedia (2021). In total, this study identified 34 overlay journals. Please see the paper for more details about the excluded journal types.

The journal ISSN numbers, manuscript source repositories, first overlay volumes, article volumes, publication languages, peer-review type, licence for published articles, author costs, publisher types, submission policy, and preprint availability policy were observed by inspecting journal editorial policies and submission guidelines found from journal websites. The overlay journals’ ISSN numbers were identified by examining journal websites and cross-checking this information with the Ulrich’s periodicals database (Ulrichsweb, 2021). Journals that published review reports, either with reviewers’ names or anonymously, were classified as operating with open peer-review. Publisher types defined by Laakso and Björk (2013) were used to categorise the findings concerning the publishers. If the journal website did not include publisher information, the editorial board was interpreted to publish the journal.

The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) field of science classification was used to categorise the journals into different domains of science. The journals’ primary OECD field of sciences were defined by the authors through examining the journal websites.

Whether the journals were indexed in the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), Scopus, or Clarivate Analytics’ Web of Science Core collection’s journal master list was examined by searching the services with journal ISSN numbers and journal titles.

The identified overlay journals were examined from the viewpoint of both qualitative and quantitative journal metrics. The qualitative metrics comprised the Nordic expert panel rankings of scientific journals, namely the Finnish Publication Forum, the Danish Bibliometric Research Indicator and the Norwegian Register for Scientific Journals, Series and Publishers. Searches were conducted from the web portals of the above services with both ISSN numbers and journal titles. Clarivate Analytics’ Journal Citation Reports database was searched with the use of both ISSN numbers and journal titles to identify whether the journals had a Journal Citation Indicator (JCI), Two-Year Impact Factor (IF) and an Impact Factor ranking (IF rank). The examined Journal Impact Factors and Impact Factor rankings were for the year 2020 (as released in 2021).

Conservation and Society Impact Factor 2024-2025 - ResearchHelpDesk - Conservation & Society Aim Conservation & Society is a peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary, open-access journal, dedicated to the advancement of the theory and practice of conservation. It aims to serve as a bridge between conservation practitioners from a wide array of disciplines and therefore seeks to disseminate work presented in an integrative and simple manner that is accessible to individuals from disciplines ranging from the natural and social sciences to the humanities. Conservation & Society Scope The journal draws on both natural and social sciences and covers basic and applied research in areas including but not restricted to political ecology, human-wildlife conflicts, decentralised conservation, conservation policy, ecosystem structure and functioning, systematics, community and species ecology, behavioural ecology, landscape ecology, restoration ecology and conservation biology. Readership The journal is of interest to academics, researchers, teachers, naturalists, policy makers, planners, resource managers and media professionals. About the Journal Conservation & Society (www.conservationandsociety.org) is a peer-reviewed interdisciplinary open access journal dedicated to the advancement of the theory and practice of conservation. The journal draws on both natural and social sciences, and covers basic and applied research in areas including but not restricted to political ecology, environmental history, anthropology and sociology, human ecology, conservation policy and governance, human-wildlife conflicts, ecosystem structure and functioning, systematics, community and species ecology, behavioural ecology, landscape ecology, restoration ecology, and conservation biology. The journal publishes submitted and commissioned articles, debates and discussions, editorials, book reviews, comments and notes, and reader feedback. Conservation & Society is of interest to academics, researchers, teachers, naturalists, policymakers, planners, and resource managers. It aims to serve as a bridge between conservation practitioners from a wide array of disciplines and therefore seeks to disseminate work presented in an integrative and simple manner that is accessible to individuals from disciplines ranging from the natural and social sciences to the humanities. The journal accepts articles addressing conservation issues the world over, with a focus on developing countries. Abstracting and Indexing Information The journal is registered with the following abstracting partners: Baidu Scholar, CNKI (China National Knowledge Infrastructure), EBSCO Publishing's Electronic Databases, Ex Libris – Primo Central, Google Scholar, Hinari, Infotrieve, National Science Library, ProQuest, TDNet, Wanfang Data The journal is indexed with, or included in, the following: DOAJ, Indian Science Abstracts, Scimago Journal Ranking, SCOPUS, Science Citation Index Expanded, Web of Science SJR Report Year SJR 2012 0.263 2013 0.779 2014 0.986 2015 0.815 2016 0.765 2017 0.811 2018 0.797 2019 0.779 2020 1.040 Cites Year Value Self Cites 2007 0 Self Cites 2008 8 Self Cites 2009 4 Self Cites 2010 14 Self Cites 2011 10 Self Cites 2012 15 Self Cites 2013 18 Self Cites 2014 11 Self Cites 2015 12 Self Cites 2016 6 Self Cites 2017 10 Self Cites 2018 10 Self Cites 2019 9 Self Cites 2020 15 Total Cites 2007 0 Total Cites 2008 20 Total Cites 2009 54 Total Cites 2010 135 Total Cites 2011 77 Total Cites 2012 140 Total Cites 2013 161 Total Cites 2014 184 Total Cites 2015 218 Total Cites 2016 163 Total Cites 2017 193 Total Cites 2018 223 Total Cites 2019 261 Total Cites 2020 324 Cites per document Year Value Cites / Doc. (4 years) 2007 0.000 Cites / Doc. (4 years) 2008 0.741 Cites / Doc. (4 years) 2009 1.000 Cites / Doc. (4 years) 2010 1.646 Cites / Doc. (4 years) 2011 1.613 Cites / Doc. (4 years) 2012 1.584 Cites / Doc. (4 years) 2013 1.880 Cites / Doc. (4 years) 2014 2.475 Cites / Doc. (4 years) 2015 2.214 Cites / Doc. (4 years) 2016 1.896 Cites / Doc. (4 years) 2017 2.235 Cites / Doc. (4 years) 2018 2.061 Cites / Doc. (4 years) 2019 2.234 Cites / Doc. (4 years) 2020 2.946 Cites / Doc. (3 years) 2007 0.000 Cites / Doc. (3 years) 2008 0.741 Cites / Doc. (3 years) 2009 1.000 Cites / Doc. (3 years) 2010 1.646 Cites / Doc. (3 years) 2011 0.917 Cites / Doc. (3 years) 2012 1.628 Cites / Doc. (3 years) 2013 1.809 Cites / Doc. (3 years) 2014 2.067 Cites / Doc. (3 years) 2015 2.247 Cites / Doc. (3 years) 2016 1.583 Cites / Doc. (3 years) 2017 1.804 Cites / Doc. (3 years) 2018 2.027 Cites / Doc. (3 years) 2019 2.231 Cites / Doc. (3 years) 2020 2.817 Cites / Doc. (2 years) 2007 0.000 Cites / Doc. (2 years) 2008 0.741 Cites / Doc. (2 years) 2009 1.000 Cites / Doc. (2 years) 2010 0.764 Cites / Doc. (2 years) 2011 1.018 Cites / Doc. (2 years) 2012 1.586 Cites / Doc. (2 years) 2013 1.750 Cites / Doc. (2 years) 2014 1.850 Cites / Doc. (2 years) 2015 1.636 Cites / Doc. (2 years) 2016 0.959 Cites / Doc. (2 years) 2017 1.714 Cites / Doc. (2 years) 2018 2.000 Cites / Doc. (2 years) 2019 2.131 Cites / Doc. (2 years) 2020 3.120 Year International Collaboration 2007 37.04 2008 29.63 2009 32.14 2010 24.14 2011 37.93 2012 58.06 2013 31.03 2014 37.84 2015 37.84 2016 21.21 2017 37.50 2018 45.45 2019 32.26 2020 44.12

A comprehensive list of ecology and evolution journals including citations, impact factor, and eigenfactor scores. Data derived from the 2018 Journal Citation Reports bibliometric tools.

Data (tab-delimited file .txt) and R code (.r file) supporting the study:Mammola S, Martínez A (2020) Let research on subterranean habitats resonate! Subterranean biology.The database lists 21,486 research articles focused on caves and other subterranean habitats published between 1991 and 2019. The yearly Impact factor of journals is based on the periodical reports by the Journal Citation Reports of Clarivate. See for further details see:Martínez A, Mammola S (2020) Specialized terminology limits the reach of new scientific knowledge. BioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.20.258996Variable codes:TI = TitleSO = JournalDT = Article typePY = Publication yearcitations = number of citations in Web of ScienceIF = Impact factor of the journal (based on the PY)

This paper introduces a citation-based method to obtain updated and extended information about news coverage of research. ProQuest was used to search for citations to 9,639 Science and 3,412 Social Science journals from eight UK daily newspapers during 2006-2015. Most Science (95%) and Social Science (94%) journals were never cited by these newspapers. Half of the cited Science journals covered medical or health-related topics, whereas 43% of the Social Sciences journals were related to psychiatry or psychology. There was no general trend for news coverage to increase or decrease over time. A content analysis of the citing news stories found that 94% mentioned journals to report research findings. From these, 60% described research extensively and 53% used more than one source. There were variations in the extent to which newspapers reported good or bad news and most news stories had no comments about the quality of the reported research. Finally, a small number of prestigious British journals were cited particularly often. In conclusion, whilst it is challenging to attract press coverage for non-health research, it is less difficult than previously thought for the social sciences and researchers should be encouraged to promote health-related studies and those in prestigious journals.

Dataset from a study aiming to analyze the coverage of Latin American and Caribbean journals in Google Scholar Metrics (GSM). Data from 8,205 journals from 24 countries of the region were downloaded from Latindex database. A Python script was used for automated title search and data extraction (titles, h5-index, h5-median, URLs) in GSM. For the journals not found, a manual search was carried out, with attempts by variations of the title. It was found 3,070 journals indexed in GSM, which corresponds to 37.42% of the Latindex list. The search was performed on the 2021 edition of GSM, which considers articles published between 2016 and 2020 and citations registered until July 2021. The number of all types of documents published (productivity) in the h5-index period (2016-2020) in Scopus, Journal Citation Reports, and SciELO of 1,314 journals was also identified.

The present dataset is the result of this study, which is under peer-review in a scientific journal.

The dataset comprises titles, h5-index; h5-median, URLs of 3,070 publications from Latin America and the Caribbean identified in Google Scholar Metrics, and the respective editorial information of the publications was extracted from Latindex

The original language of the content was kept, mainly Spanish in the case of editorial data from Latindex. The columns descriptors are also shown in English.

The productivity data refer to the number of all types of documents published by the journals in the period 2016-2020. Data were extracted from the InCities Journal Citation Reports, Scopus, and SciELO Citation Index (Web of Science database).

In this version 2, only the productivity data were changed, covering a larger number of journals (1,314) and including all types of documents. Other data are the same as in the first version (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5572873).

Australasian Journal of Educational Technology Impact Factor 2024-2025 - ResearchHelpDesk - The Australasian Journal of Educational Technology is the journal of ASCILITE, the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education. It aims to promote research and scholarship on the integration of technology in tertiary education, promote effective practice, and inform policy. Please see About-Focus and Scope for a more detailed description of the scope of the journal. AJET is indexed in EDITLib, Thomson Reuters Web of Science, Scopus the ACER Blended Online Learning and Distance Education research bankand EBSCOhost Electronic Journals Service. AJET citation statistics appear within the Thomson Reuters ISI Journal Citation Reports (Social Science Citation Index), the Google Scholar Metrics and the Scopus SCImago journal rankings. Prior to Volume 20, 2004, AJET was published under the title Australian Journal of Educational Technology. AJET has no publication charges.

The New England Journal of Medicine Acceptance Rate - ResearchHelpDesk - The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) is the world’s leading medical journal and website. Published continuously for over 200 years, NEJM delivers high-quality, peer-reviewed research and interactive clinical content to physicians, educators, and the global medical community. Our mission is to bring physicians the best research and information at the intersection of biomedical science and clinical practice and to present this information in understandable and clinically useful formats that inform health care delivery and improve patient outcomes. To these ends, the NEJM editorial team employs rigorous: Editorial, peer, and statistical review processes to evaluate manuscripts for scientific accuracy, novelty, and importance. Policies and practices to ensure that authors disclose all relevant financial associations and that such associations in no way influence the content NEJM publishes. A truly global brand, NEJM keeps health care professionals at the leading edge of medical knowledge, helps them to gain broad understanding in their areas of interest, and provides valuable perspectives on the practice of medicine. Today, NEJM is the most widely read, cited, and influential general medical periodical in the world. More than 600,000 people from nearly every country read NEJM in print and online each week. Each year, NEJM receives more than 16,000 research and other submissions for consideration for publication. About 5% of original research submissions achieve publication by NEJM; more than half originate from outside the U.S. NEJM is cited more often in scientific literature than any other medical journal, and has the highest Journal Impact Factor (70.670) of all general medical journals (2018 Journal Citation Reports, Web of Science Group, 2019). NEJM is a Public Access Journal. All original research content is freely available on NEJM.org six months after the date of publication. In addition, qualifying low-income countries are granted free access to all articles on NEJM.org dating back to 1990. The editors may also make certain materials including articles on global health and of public health importance free to all readers immediately upon publication on NEJM.org

BackgroundAnesthesiology research is growing at a rapid pace. It is essential to understand the scope and trends over time to identify gaps and future areas for growth. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SRMA) are summaries of the best available evidence to address a specific research question via a comprehensive literature search, in-depth analyses, and synthesis of results. High-quality SRMA are increasingly used and play an essential role in medical research.ObjectiveWe aimed to explore the trends of SRMA in indexed anesthesia journals.MethodsSRMA published in indexed anesthesia journals from 2013 to 2023 were retrieved from the Web of Science database. Data were presented via descriptive statistics. We used CiteSpace 6.1.R6 to analyze countries, institutions, journals, authors, and keywords through visual maps to explore the research hotspots and trends. The journal’s Journal Citation Reports partition, impact factor, annual publications, journals H-index, and a number of highly-cited papers were calculated in the WoS database.ResultsA total of 34 indexed anesthesia journals and 3,004 SRMA were included. The year 2021 was the year with the most SRMA (385/3,004). Out of the 3,004 SRMAs, 36 (0.03%) were highly cited papers, and 22 of the 36 highly cited papers focused on “pain management.” BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA had the highest 5-year impact factor (9.6) in 2022 Journal Citation Reports, the most significant number of publications (268/3,004), the highest total number of citations (13,173/86,145), and the most significant number of SRMAs cited more than 100 (36/160). ANAESTHESIA achieved the highest impact factor in the 2022 Journal Citation Reports (10.7) and the highest average annual citations (58.82). PAIN had the highest number of highly cited papers (15/36). The United States of America was the most productive country, with 823/3,004 SRMAs. University Toronto had the highest number of publications (245/3,004). The most frequent of keywords was the topic “Pain Management” (1,622/29.1%).ConclusionThis present study would be valuable to practitioners, academics, researchers, and students in understanding the dynamics of progress in anesthesiology.

Fundamental changes in the way scientific research is disseminated have inspired the concept of altmetrics, most prominently the Altmetric Attention Score (AAS). The exact relation between the latter and traditional measures of science reception (e.g. citation count) is unknown. In this study, we determined citation counts and AAS as well as the ratio between the two (AAS-to-citation ratio) in 138,339 original research and review articles from 86 neurological journals between 2012 and 2021. The journal impact factor was closely correlated with both citation count (rs = 0.73) and AAS (rs = 0.64), whereas it showed a negative association with the AAS-to-citation ratio (rs = −0.26). Reviews accumulated more citations and a higher AAS than original research, while their AAS-to-citation ratio was significantly lower. Citation count was the only metric significantly associated with the number of publications by country (rs = 0.65). There were notable differences between major neurological subspecialties, with Alzheimer’s disease the article topic having the highest average citation count, AAS, and AAS-to-citation ratio. Our findings suggest that the career of a neurological paper in the academic and public sphere is determined by various and sometimes specific factors. Methods To gain a representative overview of the research in neurology during the decade of interest, we took the top 20 neurology journals by h5 index11 listed on Google Scholar and combined them with the top 50 neurology and clinical neurology journals according to the SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) (https://www.scimagojr.com). Only journals with at least 100 citable documents (i.e. original research or reviews) over the period of interest were considered to avoid potential bias by outliers. Any duplicates were removed. In total, 86 journals were chosen for further analyses. The Web of Science (WoS) Core Collection was used for the identification of articles to be included. Every document from the 86 journals listed as either ‘Article’ or ‘Review’ with a final publication year between 2012 and 2021 was included in the analysis. This timeframe was selected with two reasons in mind: First, the company Altmetric (and with it the AAS) was founded in 2011, so 2012 constitutes the earliest year with full coverage. Second, since the data collection took place in late 2022, the year 2021 was fully covered in the databases and article citations/online dissemination had already been given some time to accumulate. Citation counts and other metadata for each document were retrieved from the WoS Core Collection database. Impact factors for each journal were retrieved through Clarivate’s Journal Citation Reports (2021 being the most recent data available).AAS data were obtained through the Altmetric API using the documents’ unique Digital Object Identifier. All data were collected between the 13th and 15th of November, 2022.

Dataset belonging to the report: Publication cultures and Dutch research output: a quantitative assessment

On the report:

Research into publication cultures commissioned by VSNU and carried out by Utrecht University Library has detailed university output beyond just journal articles, as well as the possibilities to assess open access levels of these other output types. For all four main fields reported on, the use of publication types other than journal articles is indeed substantial. For Social Sciences and Arts & Humanities in particular (with over 40% and over 60% of output respectively not being regular journal articles) looking at journal articles only ignores a significant share of their contribution to research and society. This is not only about books and book chapters, either: book reviews, conference papers, reports, case notes (in law) and all kinds of web publications are also significant parts of university output.

Analyzing all these publication forms and especially determining to what extent they are open access is currently not easy. Even combining some the largest citation databases (Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions) leaves out a lot of non-article content and in some fields even journal articles are only partly covered. Lacking metadata like affiliations and DOIs (either in the original documents or in the scholarly search engines) makes it even harder to analyze open access levels by institution and field. Using repository-harvesting databases like BASE and NARCIS in addition to the main citation databases improves understanding of open access of non-article output, but these routes also have limitations. The report has recommendations for stakeholders, mostly to improve metadata and coverage and apply persistent identifiers.

Endoscopic Ultrasound Impact Factor 2024-2025 - ResearchHelpDesk - Endoscopic Ultrasound, a publication of Euro-EUS Scientific Committee, Asia-Pacific EUS Task Force and Latin American Chapter of EUS, is a peer-reviewed online journal with Bimonthly print on demand compilation of issues published. The journal’s full text is available online at http://www.eusjournal.com. The journal allows free access (Open Access) to its contents and permits authors to self-archive the final accepted version of the articles on any OAI-compliant institutional / subject-based repository. The journal does not charge for submission, processing or publication of manuscripts and even for color reproduction of photographs. Abstracting and Indexing Information The journal is registered with the following abstracting partners: Baidu Scholar, CNKI (China National Knowledge Infrastructure), EBSCO Publishing's Electronic Databases, Ex Libris – Primo Central, Google Scholar, Hinari, Infotrieve, National Science Library, ProQuest, TdNet, Wanfang Data The journal is indexed with, or included in, the following: EMBASE/ Excerpta Medica, Index Copernicus, PubMed Central, Scimago Journal Ranking, SCOPUS, Science Citation Index Expanded, Web of Science Impact Factor® as reported in the 2018 Journal Citation Reports® (Clarivate Analytics, 2019): 2.835

The research life cycle of nanotechnology (NT) and its innovation through grey literature in the form of technical reports in Korea. The changes in the numbers of publications of grey literature and white literature in NT show the process of innovation, as technical reports and journal articles contain research results. Numbers of publications of Korean technical reports on National Discovery for Science Leaders (NDSL) and journal articles on Web of Science Science Citation Index Expended (WoS (SCIE)) are compared year by year. In general, the technical reports were produced at an earlier date than journal articles on the Web of Science. Grey literature contains creative ideas and research output, and reflects the early stage of nanotechnology and thus provides a means of tracing innovation in a specific field of science and technology in Korea.

The New England Journal of Medicine Impact Factor 2024-2025 - ResearchHelpDesk - The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) is the world’s leading medical journal and website. Published continuously for over 200 years, NEJM delivers high-quality, peer-reviewed research and interactive clinical content to physicians, educators, and the global medical community. Our mission is to bring physicians the best research and information at the intersection of biomedical science and clinical practice and to present this information in understandable and clinically useful formats that inform health care delivery and improve patient outcomes. To these ends, the NEJM editorial team employs rigorous: Editorial, peer, and statistical review processes to evaluate manuscripts for scientific accuracy, novelty, and importance. Policies and practices to ensure that authors disclose all relevant financial associations and that such associations in no way influence the content NEJM publishes. A truly global brand, NEJM keeps health care professionals at the leading edge of medical knowledge, helps them to gain broad understanding in their areas of interest, and provides valuable perspectives on the practice of medicine. Today, NEJM is the most widely read, cited, and influential general medical periodical in the world. More than 600,000 people from nearly every country read NEJM in print and online each week. Each year, NEJM receives more than 16,000 research and other submissions for consideration for publication. About 5% of original research submissions achieve publication by NEJM; more than half originate from outside the U.S. NEJM is cited more often in scientific literature than any other medical journal, and has the highest Journal Impact Factor (70.670) of all general medical journals (2018 Journal Citation Reports, Web of Science Group, 2019). NEJM is a Public Access Journal. All original research content is freely available on NEJM.org six months after the date of publication. In addition, qualifying low-income countries are granted free access to all articles on NEJM.org dating back to 1990. The editors may also make certain materials including articles on global health and of public health importance free to all readers immediately upon publication on NEJM.org