Facebook
Twitterhttps://spdx.org/licenses/CC0-1.0.htmlhttps://spdx.org/licenses/CC0-1.0.html
Objective: To determine the top 100-ranked (by impact factor) clinical journals' policies toward publishing research previously published on preprint servers (preprints).
Design: Cross sectional. Main outcome measures: Editorial guidelines toward preprints, journal rank by impact factor.
Results: 86 (86%) of the journals examined will consider papers previously published as preprints (preprints), 13 (13%) determine their decision on a case-by-case basis, and 1 (1%) does not allow preprints.
Conclusions: We found wide acceptance of publishing preprints in the clinical research community, although researchers may still face uncertainty that their preprints will be accepted by all of their target journals.
Methods We examined journal policies of the 100 top-ranked clinical journals using the 2018 impact factors as reported by InCites Journal Citation Reports (JCR). First, we examined all journals with an impact factor greater than 5, and then we manually screened by title and category do identify the first 100 clinical journals. We included only those that publish original research. Next, we checked each journal's editorial policy on preprints. We examined, in order, the journal website, the publisher website, the Transpose Database, and the first 10 pages of a Google search with the journal name and the term "preprint." We classified each journal's policy, as shown in this dataset, as allowing preprints, determining based on preprint status on a case-by-case basis, and not allowing any preprints. We collected data on April 23, 2020.
(Full methods can also be found in previously published paper.)
Facebook
TwitterJournal of Accounting Research Impact Factor 2024-2025 - ResearchHelpDesk - The Journal of Accounting Research is a general-interest accounting journal. It publishes original research in all areas of accounting and related fields that utilizes tools from basic disciplines such as economics, statistics, psychology, and sociology. This research typically uses analytical, empirical archival, experimental, and field study methods and addresses economic questions, external and internal, in accounting, auditing, disclosure, financial reporting, taxation, and information as well as related fields such as corporate finance, investments, capital markets, law, contracting, and information economics. The journal publishes four regular issues and one conference issue each year. The conference issue contains papers from the annual accounting research conference held at the University of Chicago. Topics published include: The impact of financial reporting and disclosure on stock prices; The economics of auditing, enforcement and audit oversight; The use of accounting information in contracting in debt, labour, supply, and other markets; The role of accounting in compensation and in corporate governance; The role of managerial accounting on internal decision making such as budgeting, costing, and transfer pricing; The real effects of financial reporting and disclosure (e.g. on firm behaviour); The economics of regulation of financial reporting and disclosure, including bank regulation; International differences in financial reporting and the role of reporting standards in international capital markets; The political economy of standard-setting; The use of accounting information in public finance and macroeconomic statistics; The impact of tax regulation on transaction structuring; The role of transparency in markets and society; Corporate Social Responsibility Keywords Accounting, Finance, Business, Global, Research, Statistical, Historical, Professional, Auditing, Theory, Financial, Management, Social, Environmental, Taxation, Analysis, Journal, Studies, Article, Periodical, Review, Book, Standards, Regulation, Rules, International Abstracting and Indexing Information ABI/INFORM Collection (ProQuest) Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection (ProQuest) Business Abstracts (EBSCO Publishing) Business ASAP (GALE Cengage) Business Premium Collection (ProQuest) CatchWord (Publishing Technology) Current Contents: Social & Behavioral Sciences (Clarivate Analytics) Current Index to Statistics (ASA/IMS) EBSCO Online (EBSCO Publishing) EconLit (AEA) Emerald Management Reviews (Emerald) Expanded Academic ASAP (GALE Cengage) InfoTrac (GALE Cengage) Journal Citation Reports/Social Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics) OmniFile Full Text Mega Edition (HW Wilson) Periodical Index Online (ProQuest) Proquest Business Collection (ProQuest) ProQuest Central (ProQuest) ProQuest Central K-277 ProQuest Politics Collection (ProQuest) ProQuest Sociology Collection (ProQuest) RePEc: Research Papers in Economics Research Library (ProQuest) Research Library Prep (ProQuest) SCOPUS (Elsevier) Social Science Premium Collection (ProQuest) Social Sciences Citation Index (Clarivate Analytics)
Facebook
TwitterJournal of Ophthalmology Impact Factor 2024-2025 - ResearchHelpDesk - Journal of Ophthalmology is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research, review, and clinical studies related to the anatomy, physiology and diseases of the eye. Submissions should focus on focusing on new diagnostic and surgical techniques, instrument and therapy updates, as well as clinical trials and research findings. Journal of Ophthalmology is archived in Portico, which provides permanent archiving for electronic scholarly journals, as well as via the LOCKSS initiative. It operates a fully open access publishing model which allows open global access to its published content. This model is supported through Article Processing Charges. The most recent Impact Factor for Journal of Ophthalmology is 1.580 according to the 2018 Journal Citation Reports released by Clarivate Analytics in 2019. The journal’s most recent CiteScore is 1.78 according to the CiteScore 2018 metrics released by Scopus. Journal of Ophthalmology is included in many leading abstracting and indexing databases. Academic OneFile Academic Search Alumni Edition Academic Search Complete Airiti Library Biological Sciences Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) CINAHL Plus with Full Text CNKI Scholar Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) EBSCO Discovery Service EBSCOhost Connection EBSCOhost Research Databases Expanded Academic ASAP Expanded Academic Index Google Scholar Health and Wellness Resource Center Health Reference Center Academic HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme InfoTrac Custom journals J-Gate Portal Journal Citation Reports - Science Edition Open Access Journals Integrated Service System Project (GoOA) Primo Central Index PubMed PubMed Central SafetyLit Science Citation Index Expanded Scopus The Summon Service WorldCat Discovery Services
Facebook
TwitterThe journals’ author guidelines and/or editorial policies were examined on whether they take a stance with regard to the availability of the underlying data of the submitted article. The mere explicated possibility of providing supplementary material along with the submitted article was not considered as a research data policy in the present study. Furthermore, the present article excluded source codes or algorithms from the scope of the paper and thus policies related to them are not included in the analysis of the present article.
For selection of journals within the field of neurosciences, Clarivate Analytics’ InCites Journal Citation Reports database was searched using categories of neurosciences and neuroimaging. From the results, journals with the 40 highest Impact Factor (for the year 2017) indicators were extracted for scrutiny of research data policies. Respectively, the selection journals within the field of physics was created by performing a similar search with the categories of physics, applied; physics, atomic, molecular & chemical; physics, condensed matter; physics, fluids & plasmas; physics, mathematical; physics, multidisciplinary; physics, nuclear and physics, particles & fields. From the results, journals with the 40 highest Impact Factor indicators were again extracted for scrutiny. Similarly, the 40 journals representing the field of operations research were extracted by using the search category of operations research and management.
Journal-specific data policies were sought from journal specific websites providing journal specific author guidelines or editorial policies. Within the present study, the examination of journal data policies was done in May 2019. The primary data source was journal-specific author guidelines. If journal guidelines explicitly linked to the publisher’s general policy with regard to research data, these were used in the analyses of the present article. If journal-specific research data policy, or lack of, was inconsistent with the publisher’s general policies, the journal-specific policies and guidelines were prioritized and used in the present article’s data. If journals’ author guidelines were not openly available online due to, e.g., accepting submissions on an invite-only basis, the journal was not included in the data of the present article. Also journals that exclusively publish review articles were excluded and replaced with the journal having the next highest Impact Factor indicator so that each set representing the three field of sciences consisted of 40 journals. The final data thus consisted of 120 journals in total.
‘Public deposition’ refers to a scenario where researcher deposits data to a public repository and thus gives the administrative role of the data to the receiving repository. ‘Scientific sharing’ refers to a scenario where researcher administers his or her data locally and by request provides it to interested reader. Note that none of the journals examined in the present article required that all data types underlying a submitted work should be deposited into a public data repositories. However, some journals required public deposition of data of specific types. Within the journal research data policies examined in the present article, these data types are well presented by the Springer Nature policy on “Availability of data, materials, code and protocols” (Springer Nature, 2018), that is, DNA and RNA data; protein sequences and DNA and RNA sequencing data; genetic polymorphisms data; linked phenotype and genotype data; gene expression microarray data; proteomics data; macromolecular structures and crystallographic data for small molecules. Furthermore, the registration of clinical trials in a public repository was also considered as a data type in this study. The term specific data types used in the custom coding framework of the present study thus refers to both life sciences data and public registration of clinical trials. These data types have community-endorsed public repositories where deposition was most often mandated within the journals’ research data policies.
The term ‘location’ refers to whether the journal’s data policy provides suggestions or requirements for the repositories or services used to share the underlying data of the submitted works. A mere general reference to ‘public repositories’ was not considered a location suggestion, but only references to individual repositories and services. The category of ‘immediate release of data’ examines whether the journals’ research data policy addresses the timing of publication of the underlying data of submitted works. Note that even though the journals may only encourage public deposition of the data, the editorial processes could be set up so that it leads to either publication of the research data or the research data metadata in conjunction to publishing of the submitted work.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Raw data belonged to the study of use and sharing of raw research data in the Journal Citation Reports' Emergency Medicine Category.
Facebook
TwitterJournal of Chemistry Impact Factor 2024-2025 - ResearchHelpDesk - Journal of Chemistry is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles as well as review articles on all aspects of fundamental and applied chemistry. Journal of Chemistry is archived in Portico, which provides permanent archiving for electronic scholarly journals, as well as via the LOCKSS initiative. It operates a fully open access publishing model which allows open global access to its published content. This model is supported through Article Processing Charges. Journal of Chemistry is included in many leading abstracting and indexing databases. For a complete list, click here. The most recent Impact Factor for Journal of Chemistry is 1.727 according to the 2018 Journal Citation Reports released by Clarivate Analytics in 2019. The journal’s most recent CiteScore is 1.32 according to the CiteScore 2018 metrics released by Scopus. Abstracting and Indexing Academic Search Alumni Edition Academic Search Complete AgBiotech Net AgBiotech News and Information AGRICOLA Agricultural Economics Database Agricultural Engineering Abstracts Agroforestry Abstracts Animal Breeding Abstracts Animal Science Database Biofuels Abstracts Botanical Pesticides CAB Abstracts Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) CNKI Scholar Crop Physiology Abstracts Crop Science Database Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) EBSCOhost Connection EBSCOhost Research Databases Elsevier BIOBASE - Current Awareness in Biological Sciences (CABS) EMBIOlogy Energy and Power Source Global Health Google Scholar J-Gate Portal Journal Citation Reports - Science Edition Open Access Journals Integrated Service System Project (GoOA) Primo Central Index Reaxys Science Citation Index Expanded Scopus Textile Technology Index The Summon Service WorldCat Discovery Services
Facebook
TwitterJournal of Diabetes Research Impact Factor 2024-2025 - ResearchHelpDesk - Journal of Diabetes Research is a Open Access, peer-reviewed journal that publishes research articles (Orginal Article), clinical studies and review articles related to type one (1) and type two (2) diabetes. The journal welcomes submissions focusing on the etiology, management, pathogenesis, epidemiology and prevention of diabetes, as well as associated complications, such as diabetic neuropathy, retinopathy and nephropathy. Journal of Diabetes Research is archived in Portico, which provides permanent archiving for electronic scholarly journals, as well as via the LOCKSS initiative. It operates a fully open access publishing model which allows open global access to its published content. This model is supported through Article Processing Charges. The most recent Impact Factor for Journal of Diabetes Research is 2.885 according to the 2017 Journal Citation Reports released by Clarivate Analytics in 2018. The journal’s most recent CiteScore is 3.02 according to the CiteScore 2018 metrics released by Scopus.
Facebook
TwitterCC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
License information was derived automatically
Table S1. Top 20 publishers’ imprints referenced by Scopus's classification and the authors’ research
Facebook
TwitterCC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
License information was derived automatically
We identified the hundred highest impact medical journals based on impact factor reported in the Journal Citation Reports published in 2018. Characteristics of each journal in regard to specialty, impact factor, primary journal focus, continent, and open access policy were obtained. Data were collected on the presence of academic degrees following author names in the title page by assessment of multiple original research articles from each journal. Approximately ten articles published in July 2018 and August 2019 were assessed for each journal. If there was any discrepancy between the print and the online version, the print version was use. There were no discrepancies within journals for the two time periods.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Classification Used to Map Journal Citation Report® Categories onto Sub-disciplines in Fisheries and Wildlife.
Facebook
TwitterJournal of Diabetes Research FAQ - ResearchHelpDesk - Journal of Diabetes Research is a Open Access, peer-reviewed journal that publishes research articles (Orginal Article), clinical studies and review articles related to type one (1) and type two (2) diabetes. The journal welcomes submissions focusing on the etiology, management, pathogenesis, epidemiology and prevention of diabetes, as well as associated complications, such as diabetic neuropathy, retinopathy and nephropathy. Journal of Diabetes Research is archived in Portico, which provides permanent archiving for electronic scholarly journals, as well as via the LOCKSS initiative. It operates a fully open access publishing model which allows open global access to its published content. This model is supported through Article Processing Charges. The most recent Impact Factor for Journal of Diabetes Research is 2.885 according to the 2017 Journal Citation Reports released by Clarivate Analytics in 2018. The journal’s most recent CiteScore is 3.02 according to the CiteScore 2018 metrics released by Scopus.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-SA 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
List of Top Journals of Medical Research Reports sorted by citations.
Facebook
TwitterJournal of Diabetes Research Acceptance Rate - ResearchHelpDesk - Journal of Diabetes Research is a Open Access, peer-reviewed journal that publishes research articles (Orginal Article), clinical studies and review articles related to type one (1) and type two (2) diabetes. The journal welcomes submissions focusing on the etiology, management, pathogenesis, epidemiology and prevention of diabetes, as well as associated complications, such as diabetic neuropathy, retinopathy and nephropathy. Journal of Diabetes Research is archived in Portico, which provides permanent archiving for electronic scholarly journals, as well as via the LOCKSS initiative. It operates a fully open access publishing model which allows open global access to its published content. This model is supported through Article Processing Charges. The most recent Impact Factor for Journal of Diabetes Research is 2.885 according to the 2017 Journal Citation Reports released by Clarivate Analytics in 2018. The journal’s most recent CiteScore is 3.02 according to the CiteScore 2018 metrics released by Scopus.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
BackgroundAnesthesiology research is growing at a rapid pace. It is essential to understand the scope and trends over time to identify gaps and future areas for growth. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SRMA) are summaries of the best available evidence to address a specific research question via a comprehensive literature search, in-depth analyses, and synthesis of results. High-quality SRMA are increasingly used and play an essential role in medical research.ObjectiveWe aimed to explore the trends of SRMA in indexed anesthesia journals.MethodsSRMA published in indexed anesthesia journals from 2013 to 2023 were retrieved from the Web of Science database. Data were presented via descriptive statistics. We used CiteSpace 6.1.R6 to analyze countries, institutions, journals, authors, and keywords through visual maps to explore the research hotspots and trends. The journal’s Journal Citation Reports partition, impact factor, annual publications, journals H-index, and a number of highly-cited papers were calculated in the WoS database.ResultsA total of 34 indexed anesthesia journals and 3,004 SRMA were included. The year 2021 was the year with the most SRMA (385/3,004). Out of the 3,004 SRMAs, 36 (0.03%) were highly cited papers, and 22 of the 36 highly cited papers focused on “pain management.” BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA had the highest 5-year impact factor (9.6) in 2022 Journal Citation Reports, the most significant number of publications (268/3,004), the highest total number of citations (13,173/86,145), and the most significant number of SRMAs cited more than 100 (36/160). ANAESTHESIA achieved the highest impact factor in the 2022 Journal Citation Reports (10.7) and the highest average annual citations (58.82). PAIN had the highest number of highly cited papers (15/36). The United States of America was the most productive country, with 823/3,004 SRMAs. University Toronto had the highest number of publications (245/3,004). The most frequent of keywords was the topic “Pain Management” (1,622/29.1%).ConclusionThis present study would be valuable to practitioners, academics, researchers, and students in understanding the dynamics of progress in anesthesiology.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
The Excel file is organized into the following sheets:
SM_Sheet1 - global bibliometric indicators in the sport sciences
SM_Sheet2 - main indicators at country for two different period
SM_Sheet3 - list of 4159 research topics for world science research
SM_Sheet4 - a detailed description of main research topics in sport sciences
SM_Sheet5 - the number of journals included in the Journal Citation Reports (JCR) in the sport science category and the topic distribution according to the Gini Index are as follows
Facebook
TwitterAttribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-SA 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
List of Top Authors of Journal of Scientific Research and Reports sorted by citations.
Facebook
TwitterJournal of Business Ethics Impact Factor 2024-2025 - ResearchHelpDesk - The Journal of Business Ethics publishes only original articles from a wide variety of methodological and disciplinary perspectives concerning ethical issues related to business that bring something new or unique to the discourse in their field. Since its initiation in 1980, the editors have encouraged the broadest possible scope. The term business' is understood in a wide sense to include all systems involved in the exchange of goods and services, whileethics' is circumscribed as all human action aimed at securing a good life. Systems of production, consumption, marketing, advertising, social and economic accounting, labor relations, public relations, and organizational behavior are analyzed from a moral viewpoint. The style and level of dialogue involve all who are interested in business ethics - the business community, universities, government agencies, and consumer groups. Speculative philosophy as well as reports of empirical research are welcomed. In order to promote a dialogue between the various interested groups as much as possible, papers are presented in a style relatively free of specialist jargon. FT 50 - This journal is one of the 50 journals used by the Financial Times in compiling the prestigious Business School research rank Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Reports® Ranking by Category Ethics 2/54 Business 33/147 Abstracted and indexed in ABS Academic Journal Quality Guide Australian Business Deans Council (ABDC) Journal Quality List CNKI Current Contents / Social & Behavioral Sciences EBSCO Book Review Digest Plus EBSCO Business Abstracts with Full Text EBSCO Business Source EBSCO Discovery Service EBSCO Education EBSCO Education Source EBSCO Health Business EBSCO Management Collection EBSCO Nonprofit Organization Reference Center EBSCO OmniFile ECONIS ERIH PLUS Gale Gale Academic OneFile Gale InfoTrac Google Scholar Institute of Scientific and Technical Information of China JSTOR Journal Citation Reports/Social Sciences Edition Naver OCLC WorldCat Discovery Service PhilPapers ProQuest ABI/INFORM ProQuest Art, Design and Architecture Collection ProQuest Arts & Humanities Database ProQuest Arts Premium Collection ProQuest Business Premium Collection ProQuest Central ProQuest Health Research Premium Collection ProQuest Politics Collection ProQuest Psychology Database ProQuest Social Science Collection ProQuest-ExLibris Primo ProQuest-ExLibris Summon PsycINFO Psyndex Research Papers in Economics (RePEc) SCImago SCOPUS Social Science Citation Index Journal of Business Ethics - RG Journal Impact: 1.54 * *This value is calculated using ResearchGate data and is based on average citation counts from work published in this journal. The data used in the calculation may not be exhaustive. RG Journal impact history 2020 Available summer 2021 2018 / 2019 1.54 2017 1.51 2016 1.49 2015 2.63 2014 2.72 2013 2.98 2012 2.79 2011 2.22 2010 2.18 2009 1.76 2008 2.32 2007 1.46 2006 1.23 2005 1.35 2004 1.08 2003 1.11 2002 1.04 2001 0.83 2000 1.12 Additional details of Journal of Business Ethics Cited half-life 7.30 Immediacy index 0.17 Eigenfactor 0.01 Article influence 0.31 Website description Journal of Business Ethics website Other titles Journal of business ethics, JBE, J.B.E., JoBE Publication type Journals ISSN 0167-4544 OCLC 8398838 Coverage 1982-ongoing Material type Periodical, Internet resource Document type Journal / Magazine / Newspaper, Internet Resource Journal of Business Ethics - Scimago Details
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Research data to accommodate the article "Overlay journals: a study of the current landscape" (https://doi.org/10.1177/09610006221125208)
Identifying the sample of overlay journals was an explorative process (occurring during April 2021 to February 2022). The sample of investigated overlay journals were identified by using the websites of Episciences.org (2021), Scholastica (2021), Free Journal Network (2021), Open Journals (2021), PubPub (2022), and Wikipedia (2021). In total, this study identified 34 overlay journals. Please see the paper for more details about the excluded journal types.
The journal ISSN numbers, manuscript source repositories, first overlay volumes, article volumes, publication languages, peer-review type, licence for published articles, author costs, publisher types, submission policy, and preprint availability policy were observed by inspecting journal editorial policies and submission guidelines found from journal websites. The overlay journals’ ISSN numbers were identified by examining journal websites and cross-checking this information with the Ulrich’s periodicals database (Ulrichsweb, 2021). Journals that published review reports, either with reviewers’ names or anonymously, were classified as operating with open peer-review. Publisher types defined by Laakso and Björk (2013) were used to categorise the findings concerning the publishers. If the journal website did not include publisher information, the editorial board was interpreted to publish the journal.
The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) field of science classification was used to categorise the journals into different domains of science. The journals’ primary OECD field of sciences were defined by the authors through examining the journal websites.
Whether the journals were indexed in the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), Scopus, or Clarivate Analytics’ Web of Science Core collection’s journal master list was examined by searching the services with journal ISSN numbers and journal titles.
The identified overlay journals were examined from the viewpoint of both qualitative and quantitative journal metrics. The qualitative metrics comprised the Nordic expert panel rankings of scientific journals, namely the Finnish Publication Forum, the Danish Bibliometric Research Indicator and the Norwegian Register for Scientific Journals, Series and Publishers. Searches were conducted from the web portals of the above services with both ISSN numbers and journal titles. Clarivate Analytics’ Journal Citation Reports database was searched with the use of both ISSN numbers and journal titles to identify whether the journals had a Journal Citation Indicator (JCI), Two-Year Impact Factor (IF) and an Impact Factor ranking (IF rank). The examined Journal Impact Factors and Impact Factor rankings were for the year 2020 (as released in 2021).
Facebook
Twitterhttps://spdx.org/licenses/CC0-1.0.htmlhttps://spdx.org/licenses/CC0-1.0.html
Fundamental changes in the way scientific research is disseminated have inspired the concept of altmetrics, most prominently the Altmetric Attention Score (AAS). The exact relation between the latter and traditional measures of science reception (e.g. citation count) is unknown. In this study, we determined citation counts and AAS as well as the ratio between the two (AAS-to-citation ratio) in 138,339 original research and review articles from 86 neurological journals between 2012 and 2021. The journal impact factor was closely correlated with both citation count (rs = 0.73) and AAS (rs = 0.64), whereas it showed a negative association with the AAS-to-citation ratio (rs = −0.26). Reviews accumulated more citations and a higher AAS than original research, while their AAS-to-citation ratio was significantly lower. Citation count was the only metric significantly associated with the number of publications by country (rs = 0.65). There were notable differences between major neurological subspecialties, with Alzheimer’s disease the article topic having the highest average citation count, AAS, and AAS-to-citation ratio. Our findings suggest that the career of a neurological paper in the academic and public sphere is determined by various and sometimes specific factors. Methods To gain a representative overview of the research in neurology during the decade of interest, we took the top 20 neurology journals by h5 index11 listed on Google Scholar and combined them with the top 50 neurology and clinical neurology journals according to the SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) (https://www.scimagojr.com). Only journals with at least 100 citable documents (i.e. original research or reviews) over the period of interest were considered to avoid potential bias by outliers. Any duplicates were removed. In total, 86 journals were chosen for further analyses. The Web of Science (WoS) Core Collection was used for the identification of articles to be included. Every document from the 86 journals listed as either ‘Article’ or ‘Review’ with a final publication year between 2012 and 2021 was included in the analysis. This timeframe was selected with two reasons in mind: First, the company Altmetric (and with it the AAS) was founded in 2011, so 2012 constitutes the earliest year with full coverage. Second, since the data collection took place in late 2022, the year 2021 was fully covered in the databases and article citations/online dissemination had already been given some time to accumulate. Citation counts and other metadata for each document were retrieved from the WoS Core Collection database. Impact factors for each journal were retrieved through Clarivate’s Journal Citation Reports (2021 being the most recent data available).AAS data were obtained through the Altmetric API using the documents’ unique Digital Object Identifier. All data were collected between the 13th and 15th of November, 2022.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-SA 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
The availability of research data sets is an important milestone since it can enhance the dynamics of research. This study aims to analyze the PubMed Central repository to determine the availability and type of raw data sets in Cell & Tissue Engineering journals indexed in the Journal Citation Reports. The number and types of files were registered. A search of the 21 journals from the Cell & Tissue Engineering category of the 2015 Journal Citation Reports was conducted. Information was collected from October to December 2016. A study of the supplementary material of the original articles published between 2011-2015 was performed through a search in the PubMed Central repository, which is the most used free full-text repository in biomedicine. Only articles with supplementary material were retrieved. The number and types of files were registered. In cases where a compressed file, such as a .zip or .rar file, was found, it was opened to check what kinds of files it contained.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://spdx.org/licenses/CC0-1.0.htmlhttps://spdx.org/licenses/CC0-1.0.html
Objective: To determine the top 100-ranked (by impact factor) clinical journals' policies toward publishing research previously published on preprint servers (preprints).
Design: Cross sectional. Main outcome measures: Editorial guidelines toward preprints, journal rank by impact factor.
Results: 86 (86%) of the journals examined will consider papers previously published as preprints (preprints), 13 (13%) determine their decision on a case-by-case basis, and 1 (1%) does not allow preprints.
Conclusions: We found wide acceptance of publishing preprints in the clinical research community, although researchers may still face uncertainty that their preprints will be accepted by all of their target journals.
Methods We examined journal policies of the 100 top-ranked clinical journals using the 2018 impact factors as reported by InCites Journal Citation Reports (JCR). First, we examined all journals with an impact factor greater than 5, and then we manually screened by title and category do identify the first 100 clinical journals. We included only those that publish original research. Next, we checked each journal's editorial policy on preprints. We examined, in order, the journal website, the publisher website, the Transpose Database, and the first 10 pages of a Google search with the journal name and the term "preprint." We classified each journal's policy, as shown in this dataset, as allowing preprints, determining based on preprint status on a case-by-case basis, and not allowing any preprints. We collected data on April 23, 2020.
(Full methods can also be found in previously published paper.)