19 datasets found
  1. Data from: Are Overall Journal Rankings a Good Mapping for Article Quality...

    • tandf.figshare.com
    pdf
    Updated Jun 1, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Melody Lo; Yong Bao (2023). Are Overall Journal Rankings a Good Mapping for Article Quality in Specialty Fields? [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1306954.v2
    Explore at:
    pdfAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 1, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Taylor & Francishttps://taylorandfrancis.com/
    Authors
    Melody Lo; Yong Bao
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Overall journal rankings, which are generated with sample articles in different research fields, are commonly used to measure the research productivity of academic economists. In this article, we investigate a growing concern in the profession that the use of the overall journal rankings to evaluate scholars’ relative research productivity may exhibit a downward bias toward researchers in some specialty fields if their respective field journals are under-ranked in the overall journals rankings. To address this concern, we constructed new journal rankings based on the intellectual influence of research in 8 specialty fields using a sample consisting of 26,401 articles published across 60 economics journals from 1998 to 2007. We made various comparisons between the newly constructed journal rankings in specialty fields and the traditional overall journal ranking. Our results show that the overall journal ranking provides a considerably good mapping for the article quality in specialty fields. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

  2. r

    Quarterly Journal of Economics Impact Factor 2024-2025 - ResearchHelpDesk

    • researchhelpdesk.org
    Updated Feb 19, 2022
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Research Help Desk (2022). Quarterly Journal of Economics Impact Factor 2024-2025 - ResearchHelpDesk [Dataset]. https://www.researchhelpdesk.org/journal/impact-factor-if/601/quarterly-journal-of-economics
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Feb 19, 2022
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Research Help Desk
    Description

    Quarterly Journal of Economics Impact Factor 2024-2025 - ResearchHelpDesk - The Quarterly Journal of Economics is a peer-reviewed academic journal published by the Oxford University Press for the Harvard University Department of Economics. Its current editors-in-chief are Robert J. Barro, Lawrence F. Katz, Nathan Nunn, Andrei Shleifer, and Stefanie Stantcheva (Harvard University). It is the oldest professional journal of economics in the English language and covers all aspects of the field—from the journal's traditional emphasis on micro theory to both empirical and theoretical macroeconomics. According to the Journal Citation Reports, the journal has a 2015 impact factor of 6.662, ranking it first out of 347 journals in the category "Economics". It is generally regarded as one of the top 5 journals in economics, together with the American Economic Review, Econometrica, the Journal of Political Economy, and the Review of Economic Studies. The Quarterly Journal of Economics is the oldest professional journal of economics in the English language. Edited at Harvard University's Department of Economics, it covers all aspects of the field. QJE is invaluable to professional and academic economists and students around the world. Scope of the Journal The Quarterly Journal of Economics is the oldest professional journal of economics in the English language. Edited at Harvard University's Department of Economics, it covers all aspects of the field-from the journal's traditional emphasis on micro theory, to both empirical and theoretical macroeconomics. QJE is invaluable to professional and academic economists and students around the world. Impact Factor and Ranking Year Impact Factor Ssi: Economics 2020 15.563 1 out of 377 2019 11.375 1 out of 371 2018 11.775 1 out of 363 2017 7.863 1 out of 353 2016 6.662 1 out of 347 2015 5.538 2 out of 344 2014 6.654 1 out of 333 2013 5.966 3 out of 332 2012 5.278 2 out of 332 2011 5.920 2 out of 320 2010 5.940 2 out of 304 2009 5.647 2 out of 245 This information is taken from the Journal Citation Reports™ (Clarivate, 2021). Abstracting & Indexing Services The Quarterly Journal of Economics is covered by the following abstracting and indexing services: ABI-INFORM Book Review Digest Plus CAB Abstracts Coal Abstracts Criminal Justice Abstracts Current Contents: Social & Behavioral Sciences Current Index to Statistics Dietrich's Index Philosophicus Documentation in Public Administration EconLit Emerald Management Reviews Environmental RouteNet Environmental Sciences & Pollution Management Database Expanded Academic ASAP Family Index Historical Abstracts Human Resources Abstracts IBZ: International Bibliography of Periodical Literature Index of Economic Articles in Journals & Collected Volumes Index to Periodical Articles Related to Law International Bibliography of Humanities & Sociological Literature Leisure, Recreation, and Tourism Abstracts Leisure Tourism Database LexisNexis Operations Research - Management Science Peace Research Abstracts ProQuest Central Public Administration Abstracts Quality Control & Applied Statistics RePec Risk Abstracts SCOPUS Social Science Source Social Sciences Citation Index/Social SciSearch Social Sciences Index Social Work Abstracts Wilson Business Abstracts World Agricultural Economics & Rural Sociology Abstracts Zentralblatt MATH

  3. J

    General-interest versus specialty journals: Using intellectual influence of...

    • jda-test.zbw.eu
    • journaldata.zbw.eu
    .g, ods, txt, xls
    Updated Jul 22, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Yong Bao; Melody Lo; Franklin G. Mixon; Yong Bao; Melody Lo; Franklin G. Mixon (2024). General-interest versus specialty journals: Using intellectual influence of econometrics research to rank economics journals and articles (replication data) [Dataset]. https://jda-test.zbw.eu/dataset/generalinterest-versus-specialty-journals-using-intellectual-influence-of-econometrics-research-to-
    Explore at:
    xls(14336), xls(14848), xls(2611200), .g(13082), txt(3227), ods(624465)Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jul 22, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    ZBW - Leibniz Informationszentrum Wirtschaft
    Authors
    Yong Bao; Melody Lo; Franklin G. Mixon; Yong Bao; Melody Lo; Franklin G. Mixon
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    This paper demonstrates the potential problem in using existing economics journal rankings to evaluate the research productivity of scholars by constructing a new ranking of economics journals and articles. Based on 2142 econometrics sample articles published from 2000 to 2005, our ranking results show that the intellectual influence of an econometrics article published in several econometrics/statistics journals is much higher than if it were published in the most prestigious general-interest journal. Given that a study's potential influence is integrated into the submission decision, this suggests a substantial downward bias toward econometricians when existing rankings are used to evaluate their research productivity.

  4. r

    Quarterly Journal of Economics Abstract & Indexing - ResearchHelpDesk

    • researchhelpdesk.org
    Updated Feb 18, 2022
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Research Help Desk (2022). Quarterly Journal of Economics Abstract & Indexing - ResearchHelpDesk [Dataset]. https://www.researchhelpdesk.org/journal/abstract-and-indexing/601/quarterly-journal-of-economics
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Feb 18, 2022
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Research Help Desk
    Description

    Quarterly Journal of Economics Abstract & Indexing - ResearchHelpDesk - The Quarterly Journal of Economics is a peer-reviewed academic journal published by the Oxford University Press for the Harvard University Department of Economics. Its current editors-in-chief are Robert J. Barro, Lawrence F. Katz, Nathan Nunn, Andrei Shleifer, and Stefanie Stantcheva (Harvard University). It is the oldest professional journal of economics in the English language and covers all aspects of the field—from the journal's traditional emphasis on micro theory to both empirical and theoretical macroeconomics. According to the Journal Citation Reports, the journal has a 2015 impact factor of 6.662, ranking it first out of 347 journals in the category "Economics". It is generally regarded as one of the top 5 journals in economics, together with the American Economic Review, Econometrica, the Journal of Political Economy, and the Review of Economic Studies. The Quarterly Journal of Economics is the oldest professional journal of economics in the English language. Edited at Harvard University's Department of Economics, it covers all aspects of the field. QJE is invaluable to professional and academic economists and students around the world. Scope of the Journal The Quarterly Journal of Economics is the oldest professional journal of economics in the English language. Edited at Harvard University's Department of Economics, it covers all aspects of the field-from the journal's traditional emphasis on micro theory, to both empirical and theoretical macroeconomics. QJE is invaluable to professional and academic economists and students around the world. Impact Factor and Ranking Year Impact Factor Ssi: Economics 2020 15.563 1 out of 377 2019 11.375 1 out of 371 2018 11.775 1 out of 363 2017 7.863 1 out of 353 2016 6.662 1 out of 347 2015 5.538 2 out of 344 2014 6.654 1 out of 333 2013 5.966 3 out of 332 2012 5.278 2 out of 332 2011 5.920 2 out of 320 2010 5.940 2 out of 304 2009 5.647 2 out of 245 This information is taken from the Journal Citation Reports™ (Clarivate, 2021). Abstracting & Indexing Services The Quarterly Journal of Economics is covered by the following abstracting and indexing services: ABI-INFORM Book Review Digest Plus CAB Abstracts Coal Abstracts Criminal Justice Abstracts Current Contents: Social & Behavioral Sciences Current Index to Statistics Dietrich's Index Philosophicus Documentation in Public Administration EconLit Emerald Management Reviews Environmental RouteNet Environmental Sciences & Pollution Management Database Expanded Academic ASAP Family Index Historical Abstracts Human Resources Abstracts IBZ: International Bibliography of Periodical Literature Index of Economic Articles in Journals & Collected Volumes Index to Periodical Articles Related to Law International Bibliography of Humanities & Sociological Literature Leisure, Recreation, and Tourism Abstracts Leisure Tourism Database LexisNexis Operations Research - Management Science Peace Research Abstracts ProQuest Central Public Administration Abstracts Quality Control & Applied Statistics RePec Risk Abstracts SCOPUS Social Science Source Social Sciences Citation Index/Social SciSearch Social Sciences Index Social Work Abstracts Wilson Business Abstracts World Agricultural Economics & Rural Sociology Abstracts Zentralblatt MATH

  5. Rank Correlations for Economics Articles Published in 1999.

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated May 31, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    David I. Stern (2023). Rank Correlations for Economics Articles Published in 1999. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112520.t013
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 31, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOShttp://plos.org/
    Authors
    David I. Stern
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Rank Correlations for Economics Articles Published in 1999.

  6. Best Economics Departments 2018

    • dataandsons.com
    csv, zip
    Updated Aug 22, 2018
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Sean Lux (2018). Best Economics Departments 2018 [Dataset]. https://www.dataandsons.com/data-market/social-sciences/best-economics-departments-2018
    Explore at:
    csv, zipAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Aug 22, 2018
    Dataset provided by
    Authors
    Sean Lux
    License

    Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-SA 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Time period covered
    Jan 1, 2014 - Dec 31, 2017
    Description

    About this Dataset

    Data & Sons recently completed our analysis of top tier economics journal publications from 2014 to 2017 and is pleased to announce the world’s best Economics Departments based on faculty research productivity. We found the best Economics Departments in 2018. The complete list of departments publication totals and all economics publications in the top five economics journals are included. Methodology and Top 20 ranking are available in Documents.

    Category

    Social Sciences

    Keywords

    best economics department,best economics departments

    Row Count

    1647

    Price

    Free

  7. f

    Panel Tobit regressions: Ranking of publications using IDEAS journal...

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jun 21, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Sergey V. Popov (2023). Panel Tobit regressions: Ranking of publications using IDEAS journal rankings. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278320.t004
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 21, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Sergey V. Popov
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Panel Tobit regressions: Ranking of publications using IDEAS journal rankings.

  8. H

    Replication Data for: Data policies of highly-ranked social science journals...

    • dataverse.harvard.edu
    • search.dataone.org
    Updated Jan 13, 2020
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Mercè Crosas; Julian Gautier; Sebastian Karcher; Dessi Kirilova; Gerard Otalora; Abby Schwartz (2020). Replication Data for: Data policies of highly-ranked social science journals [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/CZYY1N
    Explore at:
    CroissantCroissant is a format for machine-learning datasets. Learn more about this at mlcommons.org/croissant.
    Dataset updated
    Jan 13, 2020
    Dataset provided by
    Harvard Dataverse
    Authors
    Mercè Crosas; Julian Gautier; Sebastian Karcher; Dessi Kirilova; Gerard Otalora; Abby Schwartz
    License

    CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Time period covered
    Jan 1, 2003 - Dec 12, 2017
    Dataset funded by
    Sloan Foundation
    Description

    By encouraging and requiring that authors share their data in order to publish articles, scholarly journals have become an important actor in the movement to improve the openness of data and the reproducibility of research. But how many social science journals encourage or mandate that authors share the data supporting their research findings? How does the share of journal data policies vary by discipline? What influences these journals’ decisions to adopt such policies and instructions? And what do those policies and instructions look like? We discuss the results of our analysis of the instructions and policies of 291 highly-ranked journals publishing social science research, where we studied the contents of journal data policies and instructions across 14 variables, such as when and how authors are asked to share their data, and what role journal ranking and age play in the existence and quality of data policies and instructions. We also attempt to compare our results to the results of other studies that have analyzed the policies of social science journals, although differences in the journals chosen and how each study defines what constitutes a data policy limit this comparison. We conclude that a little more than half of the journals in our study have data policies. A greater share of the economics journals have data policies and mandate sharing, followed by political science/international relations and psychology journals. Finally, we use our findings to make several recommendations: Policies should include the terms “data”, “dataset” or more specific terms that make it clear what to make available; policies should include the benefits of data sharing; journals, publishers, and associations need to collaborate more to clarify data policies; and policies should explicitly ask for qualitative data.

  9. Country Socioeconomic Status Scores, Part II

    • kaggle.com
    zip
    Updated Jul 14, 2017
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    sdorius (2017). Country Socioeconomic Status Scores, Part II [Dataset]. https://www.kaggle.com/sdorius/countryses
    Explore at:
    zip(17885 bytes)Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jul 14, 2017
    Authors
    sdorius
    License

    http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/dbcl/1.0/http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/dbcl/1.0/

    Description

    This dataset contains estimates of the socioeconomic status (SES) position of each of 149 countries covering the period 1880-2010. Measures of SES, which are in decades, allow for a 130 year time-series analysis of the changing position of countries in the global status hierarchy. SES scores are the average of each country’s income and education ranking and are reported as percentile rankings ranging from 1-99. As such, they can be interpreted similarly to other percentile rankings, such has high school standardized test scores. If country A has an SES score of 55, for example, it indicates that 55 percent of the countries in this dataset have a lower average income and education ranking than country A. ISO alpha and numeric country codes are included to allow users to merge these data with other variables, such as those found in the World Bank’s World Development Indicators Database and the United Nations Common Database.

    See here for a working example of how the data might be used to better understand how the world came to look the way it does, at least in terms of status position of countries.

    VARIABLE DESCRIPTIONS:

    unid: ISO numeric country code (used by the United Nations)

    wbid: ISO alpha country code (used by the World Bank)

    SES: Country socioeconomic status score (percentile) based on GDP per capita and educational attainment (n=174)

    country: Short country name

    year: Survey year

    gdppc: GDP per capita: Single time-series (imputed)

    yrseduc: Completed years of education in the adult (15+) population

    region5: Five category regional coding schema

    regionUN: United Nations regional coding schema

    DATA SOURCES:

    The dataset was compiled by Shawn Dorius (sdorius@iastate.edu) from a large number of data sources, listed below. GDP per Capita:

    1. Maddison, Angus. 2004. 'The World Economy: Historical Statistics'. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development: Paris. GDP & GDP per capita data in (1990 Geary-Khamis dollars, PPPs of currencies and average prices of commodities). Maddison data collected from: http://www.ggdc.net/MADDISON/Historical_Statistics/horizontal-file_02-2010.xls.

    2. World Development Indicators Database Years of Education 1. Morrisson and Murtin.2009. 'The Century of Education'. Journal of Human Capital(3)1:1-42. Data downloaded from http://www.fabricemurtin.com/ 2. Cohen, Daniel & Marcelo Cohen. 2007. 'Growth and human capital: Good data, good results' Journal of economic growth 12(1):51-76. Data downloaded from http://soto.iae-csic.org/Data.htm

    3. Barro, Robert and Jong-Wha Lee, 2013, "A New Data Set of Educational Attainment in the World, 1950-2010." Journal of Development Economics, vol 104, pp.184-198. Data downloaded from http://www.barrolee.com/

    4. Maddison, Angus. 2004. 'The World Economy: Historical Statistics'. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development: Paris. 13.

    5. United Nations Population Division. 2009.

  10. r

    Journal of Chemistry Acceptance Rate - ResearchHelpDesk

    • researchhelpdesk.org
    Updated Feb 15, 2022
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Research Help Desk (2022). Journal of Chemistry Acceptance Rate - ResearchHelpDesk [Dataset]. https://www.researchhelpdesk.org/journal/acceptance-rate/341/journal-of-chemistry
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Feb 15, 2022
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Research Help Desk
    Description

    Journal of Chemistry Acceptance Rate - ResearchHelpDesk - Journal of Chemistry is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles as well as review articles on all aspects of fundamental and applied chemistry. Journal of Chemistry is archived in Portico, which provides permanent archiving for electronic scholarly journals, as well as via the LOCKSS initiative. It operates a fully open access publishing model which allows open global access to its published content. This model is supported through Article Processing Charges. Journal of Chemistry is included in many leading abstracting and indexing databases. For a complete list, click here. The most recent Impact Factor for Journal of Chemistry is 1.727 according to the 2018 Journal Citation Reports released by Clarivate Analytics in 2019. The journal’s most recent CiteScore is 1.32 according to the CiteScore 2018 metrics released by Scopus. Abstracting and Indexing Academic Search Alumni Edition Academic Search Complete AgBiotech Net AgBiotech News and Information AGRICOLA Agricultural Economics Database Agricultural Engineering Abstracts Agroforestry Abstracts Animal Breeding Abstracts Animal Science Database Biofuels Abstracts Botanical Pesticides CAB Abstracts Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) CNKI Scholar Crop Physiology Abstracts Crop Science Database Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) EBSCOhost Connection EBSCOhost Research Databases Elsevier BIOBASE - Current Awareness in Biological Sciences (CABS) EMBIOlogy Energy and Power Source Global Health Google Scholar J-Gate Portal Journal Citation Reports - Science Edition Open Access Journals Integrated Service System Project (GoOA) Primo Central Index Reaxys Science Citation Index Expanded Scopus Textile Technology Index The Summon Service WorldCat Discovery Services

  11. A

    ‘Country Socioeconomic Status Scores: 1880-2010’ analyzed by Analyst-2

    • analyst-2.ai
    Updated Nov 24, 2018
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Analyst-2 (analyst-2.ai) / Inspirient GmbH (inspirient.com) (2018). ‘Country Socioeconomic Status Scores: 1880-2010’ analyzed by Analyst-2 [Dataset]. https://analyst-2.ai/analysis/kaggle-country-socioeconomic-status-scores-1880-2010-3da0/6156b728/?iid=003-934&v=presentation
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 24, 2018
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Analyst-2 (analyst-2.ai) / Inspirient GmbH (inspirient.com)
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Analysis of ‘Country Socioeconomic Status Scores: 1880-2010’ provided by Analyst-2 (analyst-2.ai), based on source dataset retrieved from https://www.kaggle.com/sdorius/globses on 14 February 2022.

    --- Dataset description provided by original source is as follows ---

    This dataset contains estimates of the socioeconomic status (SES) position of each of 149 countries covering the period 1880-2010. Measures of SES, which are in decades, allow for a 130 year time-series analysis of the changing position of countries in the global status hierarchy. SES scores are the average of each country’s income and education ranking and are reported as percentile rankings ranging from 1-99. As such, they can be interpreted similarly to other percentile rankings, such has high school standardized test scores. If country A has an SES score of 55, for example, it indicates that 55 percent of the world’s people live in a country with a lower average income and education ranking than country A. ISO alpha and numeric country codes are included to allow users to merge these data with other variables, such as those found in the World Bank’s World Development Indicators Database and the United Nations Common Database.

    See here for a working example of how the data might be used to better understand how the world came to look the way it does, at least in terms of status position of countries.

    VARIABLE DESCRIPTIONS: UNID: ISO numeric country code (used by the United Nations) WBID: ISO alpha country code (used by the World Bank) SES: Socioeconomic status score (percentile) based on GDP per capita and educational attainment (n=174) country: Short country name year: Survey year SES: Socioeconomic status score (1-99) for each of 174 countries gdppc: GDP per capita: Single time-series (imputed) yrseduc: Completed years of education in the adult (15+) population popshare: Total population shares

    DATA SOURCES: The dataset was compiled by Shawn Dorius (sdorius@iastate.edu) from a large number of data sources, listed below. GDP per Capita: 1. Maddison, Angus. 2004. 'The World Economy: Historical Statistics'. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development: Paris. Maddison population data in 000s; GDP & GDP per capita data in (1990 Geary-Khamis dollars, PPPs of currencies and average prices of commodities). Maddison data collected from: http://www.ggdc.net/MADDISON/Historical_Statistics/horizontal-file_02-2010.xls. 2. World Development Indicators Database Years of Education 1. Morrisson and Murtin.2009. 'The Century of Education'. Journal of Human Capital(3)1:1-42. Data downloaded from http://www.fabricemurtin.com/ 2. Cohen, Daniel & Marcelo Cohen. 2007. 'Growth and human capital: Good data, good results' Journal of economic growth 12(1):51-76. Data downloaded from http://soto.iae-csic.org/Data.htm 3. Barro, Robert and Jong-Wha Lee, 2013, "A New Data Set of Educational Attainment in the World, 1950-2010." Journal of Development Economics, vol 104, pp.184-198. Data downloaded from http://www.barrolee.com/ Total Population 1. Maddison, Angus. 2004. 'The World Economy: Historical Statistics'. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development: Paris. 13.
    2. United Nations Population Division. 2009.

    --- Original source retains full ownership of the source dataset ---

  12. r

    Journal of Chemistry Impact Factor 2024-2025 - ResearchHelpDesk

    • researchhelpdesk.org
    Updated Feb 23, 2022
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Research Help Desk (2022). Journal of Chemistry Impact Factor 2024-2025 - ResearchHelpDesk [Dataset]. https://www.researchhelpdesk.org/journal/impact-factor-if/341/journal-of-chemistry
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Feb 23, 2022
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Research Help Desk
    Description

    Journal of Chemistry Impact Factor 2024-2025 - ResearchHelpDesk - Journal of Chemistry is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles as well as review articles on all aspects of fundamental and applied chemistry. Journal of Chemistry is archived in Portico, which provides permanent archiving for electronic scholarly journals, as well as via the LOCKSS initiative. It operates a fully open access publishing model which allows open global access to its published content. This model is supported through Article Processing Charges. Journal of Chemistry is included in many leading abstracting and indexing databases. For a complete list, click here. The most recent Impact Factor for Journal of Chemistry is 1.727 according to the 2018 Journal Citation Reports released by Clarivate Analytics in 2019. The journal’s most recent CiteScore is 1.32 according to the CiteScore 2018 metrics released by Scopus. Abstracting and Indexing Academic Search Alumni Edition Academic Search Complete AgBiotech Net AgBiotech News and Information AGRICOLA Agricultural Economics Database Agricultural Engineering Abstracts Agroforestry Abstracts Animal Breeding Abstracts Animal Science Database Biofuels Abstracts Botanical Pesticides CAB Abstracts Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) CNKI Scholar Crop Physiology Abstracts Crop Science Database Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) EBSCOhost Connection EBSCOhost Research Databases Elsevier BIOBASE - Current Awareness in Biological Sciences (CABS) EMBIOlogy Energy and Power Source Global Health Google Scholar J-Gate Portal Journal Citation Reports - Science Edition Open Access Journals Integrated Service System Project (GoOA) Primo Central Index Reaxys Science Citation Index Expanded Scopus Textile Technology Index The Summon Service WorldCat Discovery Services

  13. r

    Journal of Business Ethics Impact Factor 2024-2025 - ResearchHelpDesk

    • researchhelpdesk.org
    Updated Feb 23, 2022
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Research Help Desk (2022). Journal of Business Ethics Impact Factor 2024-2025 - ResearchHelpDesk [Dataset]. https://www.researchhelpdesk.org/journal/impact-factor-if/546/journal-of-business-ethics
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Feb 23, 2022
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Research Help Desk
    Description

    Journal of Business Ethics Impact Factor 2024-2025 - ResearchHelpDesk - The Journal of Business Ethics publishes only original articles from a wide variety of methodological and disciplinary perspectives concerning ethical issues related to business that bring something new or unique to the discourse in their field. Since its initiation in 1980, the editors have encouraged the broadest possible scope. The term business' is understood in a wide sense to include all systems involved in the exchange of goods and services, whileethics' is circumscribed as all human action aimed at securing a good life. Systems of production, consumption, marketing, advertising, social and economic accounting, labor relations, public relations, and organizational behavior are analyzed from a moral viewpoint. The style and level of dialogue involve all who are interested in business ethics - the business community, universities, government agencies, and consumer groups. Speculative philosophy as well as reports of empirical research are welcomed. In order to promote a dialogue between the various interested groups as much as possible, papers are presented in a style relatively free of specialist jargon. FT 50 - This journal is one of the 50 journals used by the Financial Times in compiling the prestigious Business School research rank Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Reports® Ranking by Category Ethics 2/54 Business 33/147 Abstracted and indexed in ABS Academic Journal Quality Guide Australian Business Deans Council (ABDC) Journal Quality List CNKI Current Contents / Social & Behavioral Sciences EBSCO Book Review Digest Plus EBSCO Business Abstracts with Full Text EBSCO Business Source EBSCO Discovery Service EBSCO Education EBSCO Education Source EBSCO Health Business EBSCO Management Collection EBSCO Nonprofit Organization Reference Center EBSCO OmniFile ECONIS ERIH PLUS Gale Gale Academic OneFile Gale InfoTrac Google Scholar Institute of Scientific and Technical Information of China JSTOR Journal Citation Reports/Social Sciences Edition Naver OCLC WorldCat Discovery Service PhilPapers ProQuest ABI/INFORM ProQuest Art, Design and Architecture Collection ProQuest Arts & Humanities Database ProQuest Arts Premium Collection ProQuest Business Premium Collection ProQuest Central ProQuest Health Research Premium Collection ProQuest Politics Collection ProQuest Psychology Database ProQuest Social Science Collection ProQuest-ExLibris Primo ProQuest-ExLibris Summon PsycINFO Psyndex Research Papers in Economics (RePEc) SCImago SCOPUS Social Science Citation Index Journal of Business Ethics - RG Journal Impact: 1.54 * *This value is calculated using ResearchGate data and is based on average citation counts from work published in this journal. The data used in the calculation may not be exhaustive. RG Journal impact history 2020 Available summer 2021 2018 / 2019 1.54 2017 1.51 2016 1.49 2015 2.63 2014 2.72 2013 2.98 2012 2.79 2011 2.22 2010 2.18 2009 1.76 2008 2.32 2007 1.46 2006 1.23 2005 1.35 2004 1.08 2003 1.11 2002 1.04 2001 0.83 2000 1.12 Additional details of Journal of Business Ethics Cited half-life 7.30 Immediacy index 0.17 Eigenfactor 0.01 Article influence 0.31 Website description Journal of Business Ethics website Other titles Journal of business ethics, JBE, J.B.E., JoBE Publication type Journals ISSN 0167-4544 OCLC 8398838 Coverage 1982-ongoing Material type Periodical, Internet resource Document type Journal / Magazine / Newspaper, Internet Resource Journal of Business Ethics - Scimago Details

  14. Kendall’s rank correlation coefficient between GDP per capita, spending on...

    • figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jun 1, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Sultan Ayoub Meo; Abeer A. Al Masri; Adnan Mahmood Usmani; Almas Naeem Memon; Syed Ziauddin Zaidi (2023). Kendall’s rank correlation coefficient between GDP per capita, spending on R&D, number of universities, indexed journals and total number of research documents, citations per document, H-index in various science and social sciences subjects among Asian countries during the period 1996–2011. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0066449.t004
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 1, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOShttp://plos.org/
    Authors
    Sultan Ayoub Meo; Abeer A. Al Masri; Adnan Mahmood Usmani; Almas Naeem Memon; Syed Ziauddin Zaidi
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    τ (tau) = Kendall’s rank correlation coefficient.p =  p value.

  15. f

    Number of competitions in which respondents participated in the last 5 years...

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jun 16, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Valentina Diana Rusu; Mihaela Mocanu; Anca-Diana Bibiri (2023). Number of competitions in which respondents participated in the last 5 years by didactic or research rank of the respondents (the didactic and research ranks considered are specific to Romania, because there is no ranking system worldwide recognized). [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272292.t003
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 16, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Valentina Diana Rusu; Mihaela Mocanu; Anca-Diana Bibiri
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Romania
    Description

    Number of competitions in which respondents participated in the last 5 years by didactic or research rank of the respondents (the didactic and research ranks considered are specific to Romania, because there is no ranking system worldwide recognized).

  16. Quantile regression models: Ranking of university or other institution.

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jun 21, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Sergey V. Popov (2023). Quantile regression models: Ranking of university or other institution. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278320.t017
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 21, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOShttp://plos.org/
    Authors
    Sergey V. Popov
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Quantile regression models: Ranking of university or other institution.

  17. f

    Random effects regressions: Ranking of publications omitting unranked...

    • plos.figshare.com
    Updated Jun 21, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Sergey V. Popov (2023). Random effects regressions: Ranking of publications omitting unranked publications. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278320.t007
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 21, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Sergey V. Popov
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Random effects regressions: Ranking of publications omitting unranked publications.

  18. f

    Example of the calculation of the Hamming distance and proximity between to...

    • figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jun 4, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Alexei Kireyev; Andrey Leonidov; Stanislav Radionov; Ekaterina Vasilyeva (2023). Example of the calculation of the Hamming distance and proximity between to different partitions for the two-country the-sector world economy. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264623.t001
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 4, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Alexei Kireyev; Andrey Leonidov; Stanislav Radionov; Ekaterina Vasilyeva
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    World
    Description

    Example of the calculation of the Hamming distance and proximity between to different partitions for the two-country the-sector world economy.

  19. f

    List of factors influencing the land economic density.

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated May 31, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Fangfang Ma; Yiping Hu; Zhiwei Ding (2024). List of factors influencing the land economic density. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0304327.t001
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 31, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Fangfang Ma; Yiping Hu; Zhiwei Ding
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    List of factors influencing the land economic density.

  20. Not seeing a result you expected?
    Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Melody Lo; Yong Bao (2023). Are Overall Journal Rankings a Good Mapping for Article Quality in Specialty Fields? [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1306954.v2
Organization logo

Data from: Are Overall Journal Rankings a Good Mapping for Article Quality in Specialty Fields?

Related Article
Explore at:
pdfAvailable download formats
Dataset updated
Jun 1, 2023
Dataset provided by
Taylor & Francishttps://taylorandfrancis.com/
Authors
Melody Lo; Yong Bao
License

Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically

Description

Overall journal rankings, which are generated with sample articles in different research fields, are commonly used to measure the research productivity of academic economists. In this article, we investigate a growing concern in the profession that the use of the overall journal rankings to evaluate scholars’ relative research productivity may exhibit a downward bias toward researchers in some specialty fields if their respective field journals are under-ranked in the overall journals rankings. To address this concern, we constructed new journal rankings based on the intellectual influence of research in 8 specialty fields using a sample consisting of 26,401 articles published across 60 economics journals from 1998 to 2007. We made various comparisons between the newly constructed journal rankings in specialty fields and the traditional overall journal ranking. Our results show that the overall journal ranking provides a considerably good mapping for the article quality in specialty fields. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu